Biennial Budget Board of Public Defense
|
|
- Christopher Moore
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Biennial Budget Board of Public Defense Change Item Title: Workloads and Staffing Expenditures $2,822 $5,773 $5,773 $5,773 xxx Fund (specify the fund) $2,822 $5,773 $5,773 $5,773 The Governor recommends funding to maintain existing staff, to start bring caseloads closer to national standards, and a modest increase in funding for the public defense corporations. Funding to maintain staffing would include compensation increases, and partial funding for employee health insurance. Minnesota s Office of the Legislative Auditor concluded in its 2010 Evaluation Report of public defense that: High public defender workloads have created significant challenges for Minnesota s criminal justice system. Public defense, as seen in the Report, needs to be better funded and better staffed to be a functional part of the criminal justice system of Minnesota. From 2008 to 2010 the public defender offices lost more than 15% of their FTE attorney positions, or more than100, 000 hours of attorney time. Based on calendar year 2011case numbers, the Board is operating on approximately 57% of the number of attorneys recommended by state and national standards, 66% of the recommended investigator staff, 57% of the recommended paralegal staff, and 57% of the recommended dispositional advisor staff. Lack of resources has made public defense the prime source of delay in the courts. Inadequate numbers of lawyers often results in public defenders scheduled in two different court rooms (many times in two different counties) at the same time which results in public defenders not being available or not being prepared to proceed on cases. In these instances, victims, witnesses, law enforcement and court personnel sit idle waiting for public defenders. On the appellate level staff reductions have meant significant delays in the state s appellate courts. Staff shortages have caused delays in sentencing appeal cases and appeals of plea withdrawal and conditional release. As has occurred in other states, the delay in appellate services could lead to the courts ordering release of prisoners who have been on the waiting list too long. In 2009 the Legislature requested that the Minnesota Supreme Court consider imposing a fee on attorney licenses to help fund the public defender system. The Court approved a fee increase but only temporarily through June 30, The fee revenue amounts to $1.9 million per year and supports FTE attorney positions. Without this fee revenue, a significant portion of what the governor is recommending will need to go to filling this funding gap. The Board has petitioned the Court to continue the attorney registration fee funding for the purpose improving the efficiency of the justice system by developing an electronic case management system. The Board must create an electronic case management system that will be able to accommodate electronic disclosure by and to the prosecution. The Board currently does not have the resources (funding or staffing) to create and manage a system of this magnitude. Without additional funding this project will be delayed pdf
2 Biennial Budget Board of Public Defense With the loss of the revenue from the attorney registration fee, funding personnel cost increases will likely take up most of the first year s recommendation, and a significant portion of the second year s recommended funding. Assuming a modest increase in caseloads, additional funding the second year could be used to begin to fill vacant positions and at least maintain caseloads. Base Budget and Governor's Recommendation All Funds Gov's Recs Budget Items Fund FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base GF $65,976 $65,976 $65,976 Replace Atty. Regis. Fee GF n/a $0 $0 Staffing and Workloads GF n/a $2,822 $5,733 IT Staffing* GF n/a $0 $0 Atty. Regis. Fee SR $1,900 $0 $0 Total GF $65,976 $68,798 $71,709 Total Special Revenue SR $1,900 $0 $0 Total All Funds $67,876 $68,798 $71,709 Total All Funds +/- $922 $3,833 Statutory Change: Not Applicable. Page 2
3 Biennial Budget Corrections Change Item Title: Provide Funding for Cost Increases in Employee Compensation Expenditures 16,400 21,600 21,600 21,600 xxx Fund (specify the fund) 16,400 21,600 21,600 21,600 The Governor recommends $ million in FY2014 and $21,600 million in FY2015 to maintain staffing levels for the Department of Corrections that ensure a base level of public, staff and offender safety. This recommendation represents a 4% increase to the agency s general fund base budget and equates to 273 fulltime-equivalent positions (FTEs) by FY2015. Public safety is a core responsibility of state government. Compensation costs rise each year due to negotiated contract settlements and increased costs for health insurance, pension obligations (annual statutory increases from FY2008 through FY2011), fringe and other benefits. Funding for these costs has not been adequate, resulting in ongoing agency deficits. This recommendation includes funding for a 2% across-the-board (ATB) increase effective January 2, 2013 for all bargaining units (per tentative agreements with AFSCME and MAPE), employer-paid health insurance increases of 9% each year and negotiated step increases. This recommendation does NOT include ATB increases that may be negotiated for the FY biennium. The agency s base budget is not sufficient to fund 273 existing FTEs by the end of the biennium. Without funding layoffs would be unavoidable and public safety would be compromised. This proposal will maintain basic agency operations including offender incarceration and community supervision. Retention of existing staff will also help avoid reductions to offender programming areas that are proven to reduce recidivism such as chemical dependency and sex offender treatment, education, work, reentry and mental health services. The recidivism rate (percentage of offenders convicted of a new felony) is expected to remain stable at 37% with this proposal. Any reduction in staff and/or programming would likely result in an increased recidivism rate and increase the need for state prison beds. Statutory Change: Not Applicable.
4 Biennial Budget Court of Appeals J58 Change Item Title: Maintain Core Justice Operations Expenditures Fund (specify the fund) Use information contained in the change item report within your agency budget book for the table above. In order to maintain core justice operations in the Court of Appeals, the Governor recommends an increase of $413,000 in FY 2014 and $795,000 in FY 2015 to increase the base pay of its judges and employees, to address a funding deficiency in the Judge Pension Fund, and to fund unavoidable health insurance premium increases. This request represents a 5.9% increase to the Court of Appeals biennial base budget. For the FY biennium, the Court of Appeals requests additional funding to increase the base pay of its judges and employees. For the past four fiscal years, the Judicial Branch has negotiated zero acrossthe-board adjustments to the salary range and zero merit and step increases for its employees. Court of Appeals employees therefore continue to fall behind other public sector employees who, even in these difficult economic times, have received pay increases. The salaries for the judges similarly have not increased over this same period. As a result, Minnesota judges now rank near the bottom third nationally in judge pay. The Court of Appeals also requests funding to shore up the Judge Pension Fund. Based upon input from the Minnesota State Retirement System (MSRS), legislation will be introduced during the 2013 legislative session to increase the employer contribution to the Plan by 2%, effective July 1, This request includes funding to pay for this increased employer contribution. Finally, the Court of Appeals requests funding for unavoidable health insurance increases. Health insurance premium costs were estimated to increase by 9.0% in FY13, by 9.9% in FY 2014 and by 9.9% in FY These estimates are a placeholder due to the fact the Executive Branch s labor contracts affecting the current biennium have not yet been approved. As a result, the Court of Appeals reserves the right to submit a revised request, if circumstances warrant. In order to maintain core justice operations, the Court of Appeals requested $1.208 million in the FY biennium to increase the base pay of its judges and employees, to address a funding deficiency in the Judge Pension Fund, and to fund unavoidable health insurance premium increases. This request is sought to support the core mission and services of the Court of Appeals and to allow the Court to continue to undertake initiatives designed to increase efficiency, reduce costs and improve public services. Failure to fund base pay increases for judges and employees will compromise the Court of Appeal s ability to attract and retain the qualified, skilled, and motivated workers that are needed to take full advantage of the technological advances it is implementing. Failure to fund unavoidable health insurance and employer pension contribution increases will be tantamount to a budget cut and will result in staffing reductions. Any reductions to the Court of Appeal s budget will undermine its ability to provide the type of justice Minnesotans expect and deserve, and erode the public s confidence in the fairness and competence of their government to deliver justice. The Court of Appeals is obligated to fulfill its constitutional mandate to adjudicate and resolve cases promptly and without delay. MN Const., art I, Sec. 8.
5 Biennial Budget Court of Appeals J58 Further performance measure information can be located on the Minnesota Judicial Branch website: NAL.pdf Statutory Change: Not Applicable. Page 2
6 Biennial Budget Trial Courts J33 Change Item Title: Maintain Core Justice Operations Expenditures Fund (specify the fund) Use information contained in the change item report within your agency budget book for the table above. In order to maintain core justice operations in the Trial Courts, the Governor recommends an increase of $9.756 million in FY 2014 and $ million in FY 2015 to increase the base pay of its judges and employees, to address a funding deficiency in the Judge Pension Fund, and to fund unavoidable health insurance premium increases. This request represents a 6.2% increase to the Trial Court biennial base budget. For the FY biennium, the Trial Courts request additional funding to increase the base pay of its judges and employees. For the past four fiscal years, the Judicial Branch has negotiated zero across-theboard adjustments to the salary range and zero merit and step increases for its employees. Trial Court employees therefore continue to fall behind other public sector employees who, even in these difficult economic times, have received pay increases. The salaries for the judges similarly have not increased over this same period. As a result, Minnesota judges now rank near the bottom third nationally in judge pay. The Trial Courts also request funding to shore up the Judge Pension Fund. Based upon input from the Minnesota State Retirement System (MSRS), legislation will be introduced during the 2013 legislative session to increase the employer contribution to the Plan by 2%, effective July 1, This request includes funding to pay for this increased employer contribution. Finally, the Trial Courts request funding for unavoidable health insurance increases. Health insurance premium costs were estimated to increase by 9.0% in FY 2013, by 9.9% in FY 2014 and by 9.9% in FY These estimates are a placeholder due to the fact the Executive Branch s labor contracts affecting the current biennium have not yet been approved. As a result, the Trial Courts reserve the right to submit a revised request, if circumstances warrant. In order to maintain core justice operations, the Trial Courts requested $ million in the FY biennium to increase the base pay of its judges and employees, to address a funding deficiency in the Judge Pension Fund, and to fund unavoidable health insurance premium increases. This request is sought to support the core mission and services of the Trial Courts and to allow the Courts to continue to undertake initiatives designed to increase efficiency, reduce costs and improve public services. Failure to fund base pay increases for judges and employees will compromise the Trial Court s ability to attract and retain the qualified, skilled, and motivated workers that are needed to take full advantage of the technological advances they are implementing. Failure to fund unavoidable health insurance and employer pension contribution increases will be tantamount to a budget cut and will result in staffing reductions. Any reductions to the Trial Court s budget will undermine its ability to provide the type of justice Minnesotans expect and deserve, and erode the public s confidence in the fairness and competence of their government to deliver justice. The Trial Courts are obligated to fulfill their constitutional mandate to adjudicate and resolve cases promptly and without delay. MN Const., art I, Sec. 8. Further performance measure information can be located on the Minnesota Judicial Branch website:
7 Biennial Budget Trial Courts J33 NAL.pdf Statutory Change: Not Applicable. Page 2
8 Biennial Budget Guardian ad Litem Board Change Item Title: Maintain Core Functions of the Guardian ad Litem Board Expenditures The Governor recommends additional funding to maintain current guardian ad litem operations, including compensation increases for GAL program staff and partial funding of anticipated cost increases for health insurance. The funding will allow the GAL Board to maintain core functions and the current number of full time equivalent positions necessary to perform mandated duties in juvenile and family cases. Any increases to employer paid insurance costs or compensation changes cannot be absorbed within the current agency base budget unless cuts are made to the services currently provided. Of the total budget, 70% goes to providing direct services to children and families. Other costs include administration, training, recruitment and attorney representation of the guardian ad litem. The Guardian ad Litem Board is committed to ensuring the level of representation does not decrease and the recommended increases will assist in that regard. The program is federally mandated to provide representation in abuse and neglect cases in juvenile court and by state law in abuse and neglect cases in family and juvenile courts. The proposed change covers unavoidable employer cost increases for health insurance and compensation changes for GAL program staff. Funding will allow the GAL program to continue to represent children in over 6500 family and juvenile cases. The State Guardian ad Litem Board contributes to the statewide outcome of strong and stable families by giving abused and neglected children a strong and independent voice in our court system and working to provide better outcomes for children. The program is expected to maintain close to 100% compliance with state and federal mandates to appoint a guardian ad litem. Compliance in previous years was at 99% with current year compliance at 99.91%. Statutory Change: Not Applicable
9 Biennial Budget Human Rights Change Item Title: Ensure Good Faith Efforts of State Vendors through Contract Compliance Expenditures The Governor recommends adding two Enforcement Officers exclusively dedicated for Contract Compliance. This activity will review and audit all state contracts over $100,000 for compliance with required affirmative action plans. Adding the two additional positions will increase the base funding each fiscal year by $129,000 and increase the FTE by 2.0. With the current staffing complement of one Manager, three Enforcement Officers and one administrative staff support, Contract Compliance is limited to reviewing only a handful of additional projects. Adding two additional Enforcement Officers in Contract Compliance will provide the staff needed to conduct more on-site audits including the People s Stadium, the St. Croix Lift Bridge and Light Rail projects; ensure workforce opportunities occur and contract procurement opportunities are provided consistent with the Minnesota Human Rights Act. The implementation of adding the two positions will be effective July 1, IT Related Proposals: Not Applicable The department will be able to assure compliance on both large and small contracts with the state in a timely manner. Statutory Change: Not Applicable
10 Biennial Budget Human Rights Change Item Title: Modify Certificate of Compliance Fee and Renewal Period Special Revenue Fund Revenues (55) (55) (55) (55) The Governor recommends changes to the Certificate of Compliance fee and collection period. The current $75 fee is charged every two years for firms doing more than $100,000 business with the state. The change would double the fee to $150, but it would be collected every four years instead of every two. Firms would only have to apply for the Certificate of Compliance once every four years. This initiative would allow the Department to utilize more of its resources to activities that more positively impact the employment opportunities of historically disenfranchised groups. The renewal period for certificates of compliance issued by the Department would be extended from two years to four years. The Department would collect $150 instead of $75. While the certificate of compliance will now be good for four years, the Department will continue to review the affirmative action plans of businesses on an annual basis. Effective implementation date would be July 1, IT Related Proposals: Not Applicable The Department will be able to streamline and reduce its administrative processes to focus more of its resources on activities that positively impact the employment opportunities of historically disenfranchised groups. Statutory Change: Minn. Stat.363A.36, Subdivison 1. Page 2
11 Biennial Budget Judicial Standards, Board on Change Item Title: Deficiency Costs for Formal Disciplinary Hearing and Disability Matter Expenditures The Governor recommends funding be made immediately available to this agency for costs incurred in connection with three matters - a continuing public disciplinary hearing and two continuing confidential disability matters. The expenses will exceed the current appropriations to the agency, including funds previously dedicated to a special revolving account created specifically to defray costs for investigations and public hearings. In the disciplinary case, the subject judicial officer is alleged to have engaged in serious judicial misconduct. The disability matters will determine whether or not the subject judicial officers have physical or mental conditions that seriously interfere with their capacity to perform judicial duties. When, as now, the board is presently involved in three formal judicial disciplinary and/or disability matters, formal investigations and public hearings are required by the Board s rules. The rules require that the board justify any proposed contested discipline or disability by clear and convincing evidence before a specially appointed threeperson panel. The hearings also provide the judicial officer who is subject to the complaint the opportunity to adduce evidence, as well as produce and cross-examine witnesses. The decision of the hearing panel is then presented to the Supreme Court for final resolution. Other than the revolving fund account, costs for formal hearings are typically not included in the agency s appropriations request because the number and scope of these hearings cannot be anticipated or determined in advance. The duty to conduct a public hearing is dependent solely on what information is brought to the board s attention in any given budgetary period. Hearings require the board to provide and pay for all aspects of the proceedings, including court reporter fees, investigative costs, lawyer s fees and fees for expert witnesses such as medical service providers. In disability cases, the board s rules require it to retain and pay the lawyer representing the subject judicial officer. The board estimates that all public proceedings will be completed before the close of the fiscal year. The board s basic operating appropriation is insufficient to completely supplement the costs for this extra activity. The request will not affect the board s base budget and is a one-time request. The costs estimates are based on previous disciplinary proceedings and lawyer estimates. Costs have already been expended in these matters. The funds will cover costs that have already been incurred, as well as future costs, for the disciplinary hearing and the two disability matters referenced in the Recommendation section. The costs for these actions include fees for medical experts, court reporters, investigative services and attorney fees. IT Related Proposals: Not Applicable. Key Goals and Measures The legislature created the board to ensure that the public maintains confidence and public trust in the Minnesota judiciary. The board is the only agency that monitors judicial conduct and it is the core activity of the board. The board s duty is to investigate charges of alleged judicial misconduct or disability and to make recommendations to the Supreme Court as set out in the board s rules. The board needs these funds to proceed and complete these matters. A delay will result in harm to the public and unfairness to the judge. The public s confidence in an efficient judicial system will be reduced. Delays not only interfere with the due process of the judge, but are
12 Biennial Budget Judicial Standards, Board on detrimental to the entire judiciary. The ability of the agency to perform its statutory mission and comply with canons of ethics is significantly hampered if funds are not available when necessary. The board strives to: Promptly process and investigate complaints efficiently Provide due process to judges Adhere to the timetable set out in the Rules of the BJS to timely proceed with disciplinary proceedings There is no alternative to funding. The board is dependent solely on legislative appropriation. Because of the unique mission of this agency, and to avoid even the perception of a conflict of interest, no other funding mechanism is available. Statutory Change: Not Applicable. Page 2
13 Biennial Budget Sentencing Guidelines Commission Change Item Title: Electronic Worksheet Redesign Expenditures The Governor recommends one-time funding to enhance the electronic sentencing worksheet system. The current system is operated on a server that is being eliminated, and existing worksheets, about 17,000 per year, have a nearly 25% error rate. The new system is estimated to reduce processing time by minutes from the current 1.5 hours. This project will re-write the Electronic Worksheet System (EWS) module (currently hosted in the classic Statewide Supervision System (S3) site) to make it compatible with the new S3 site. In this process, the new EWS module will include several enhancements, which will improve data integrity for EWS and the data entry process for the EWS users. Some of the enhancements will include: 1. The ability to get basic court information from MNCIS so that probation officers will not have to retype this information and to eliminate data entry errors. 2. The ability to copy criminal history from previously completed worksheets to save time and eliminate data entry errors. 3. Automatic checks to alert probation officers to mandatory decay periods, juvenile history application issues, mandatory minimums, and conditional release terms. 4. Automatic calculation of the presumptive sentence based on severity level and criminal history score and any applicable mandatory minimums or sentence modifiers. 5. notification to probation officers when a worksheet has been reviewed or contains an error that requires attention. IT Related Proposals: Minn. Stat directs that a sentencing worksheet must be completed for every felony sentence. This system is integral to the purpose of the Sentencing Guidelines Commission. The total cost of the project is $500,000. $200,000 of the project is funded collaboratively from current biennium funds of the Sentencing Guidelines Commission, the Department of Corrections, and the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Information System Task Force. There are no additional ongoing operating costs. The Sentencing Guidelines Commission does not currently have IT staff. This project will be completed using an outside contractor. The final product will be housed in the Statewide Supervision System at the Department of Corrections; DOC MN.IT staff will assist in the selection of a contractor and oversee development. Number of electronic worksheets reviewed by staff: Previous 15,771; Current 16,109 Trend: Increased The Commission estimates that there is a 25% error rate on sentencing worksheets. The Commission has begun tracking the actual rate to establish a baseline for this as a new performance measure. Statutory Change: None applicable.
14 Biennial Budget Supreme Court Operations J65 Change Item Title: Maintain Core Justice Operations Expenditures Fund (specify the fund) Use information contained in the change item report within your agency budget book for the table above. In order to maintain core justice operations in the Supreme Court, the Governor recommends an increase of $873,000 in FY 2014 and $1.780 million in FY 2015 to increase the base pay of its justices and employees, to address a funding deficiency in the Judge Pension Fund, and to fund unavoidable health insurance premium increases. This request represents a 4.3% increase to the Supreme Court biennial base budget. For the FY biennium, the Supreme Court requests additional funding to increase the base pay of its justices and employees. For the past four fiscal years, the Judicial Branch has negotiated zero acrossthe-board adjustments to the salary range and zero merit and step increases for its employees. Supreme Court employees therefore continue to fall behind other public sector employees who, even in these difficult economic times, have received pay increases. The salaries for the justices similarly have not increased over this same period. As a result, Minnesota judges now rank near the bottom third nationally in judge pay. The Supreme Court also requests funding to shore up the Judge Pension Fund. Based upon input from the Minnesota State Retirement System (MSRS), legislation will be introduced during the 2013 legislative session to increase the employer contribution to the Plan by 2%, effective July 1, This request includes funding to pay for this increased employer contribution. Finally, the Supreme Court requests funding for unavoidable health insurance increases. Health insurance premium costs were estimated to increase by 9.0% in FY 2013, by 9.9% in FY 2014 and by 9.9% in FY These estimates are a placeholder due to the fact the Executive Branch s labor contracts affecting the current biennium have not yet been approved. As a result, the Supreme Court reserves the right to submit a revised request, if circumstances warrant. In order to maintain core justice operations, the Supreme Court requested $2.653 million in the FY biennium to increase the base pay of its judges and employees, to address a funding deficiency in the Judge Pension Fund, and to fund unavoidable health insurance premium increases. This request is sought to support the core mission and services of the Supreme Court and to allow the Court to continue to undertake initiatives designed to increase efficiency, reduce costs and improve public services. Failure to fund base pay increases for justices and employees will compromise the Supreme Court s ability to attract and retain the qualified, skilled, and motivated workers that are needed to take full advantage of the technological advances it is implementing. Failure to fund unavoidable health insurance and employer pension contribution increases will be tantamount to a budget cut and will result in staffing reductions. Any reductions to the Supreme Court s budget will undermine its ability to provide the type of justice Minnesotans expect and deserve, and erode the public s confidence in the fairness and competence of their government to deliver justice. The Supreme Court is obligated to fulfill its constitutional mandate to adjudicate and resolve cases promptly and without delay. MN Const., art I, Sec. 8.
15 Biennial Budget Supreme Court Operations J65 Further Supreme Court performance measure information can be located on the Minnesota Judicial Branch website: NAL.pdf Statutory Change: Not Applicable. Page 2
16 Biennial Budget Civil Legal Services J65 Change Item Title: Civil Legal Services (CLS) for Low-Income Minnesotans Expenditures Fund (specify the fund) Use information contained in the change item report within your agency budget book for the table above. The Governor recommends an increase of $500,000 in FY 2014 and $500,000 in FY 2015 for the grant to Civil Legal Services (CLS) made through the Supreme Court. Grants will be used to provide services to low-income Minnesotans for resolving civil legal matters. This is a 4.5% increase to CLS. Minnesota faces a widening justice gap. Since 2008, the number of low-income Minnesotans eligible for CLS services increased by 20.6% to 1.4 million people. During the same period CLS financial resources decreased by 16%. In 2009, the CLS network served only one of every two eligible clients seeking help. Today, CLS meets the need of only one of every three eligible clients seeking help. Additional funding will help narrow this justice gap by enabling CLS to serve additional families and individuals: providing safety for victims of domestic violence; preventing homelessness; helping seniors and people with disabilities live independently; and, meeting other basic human needs. For the FY biennium, the CLS requested $4.2 million to provide increased funding for the grant to Civil Legal Services made through the Supreme Court. These grants will provide services to low-income Minnesotans for resolving civil legal matters. Civil Legal Services grants will provide assistance to at least 100 additional families/individuals faced with eviction or foreclosure; at least 100 additional women and children who are victims of domestic violence will achieve safety; and at least 500 additional families/individuals will meet the basic human needs for safety, shelter, health, and income. Statutory Change: Not Applicable. Page 3
17 Biennial Budget Minnesota Tax Court Change Item Title: New Funding for Additional Staff and Resources Expenditures xxx Fund (specify the fund) The Governor recommends increasing the Court s budget by $161,000 annually to fund the hiring of two full-time judicial law clerks, to purchase access to Westlaw (an electronic legal research database), and to fund specialized continuing legal education for the Court s three judges. Except for appeals to the Minnesota Supreme Court, the Tax Court is the sole, exclusive, and final authority in all questions of law and fact arising under the state s tax laws. Since 2000, the Court s caseload has more than quadrupled: in recent years, annual filings have increased to approximately 5,400 cases (1,800 cases per judge). Written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and supporting memoranda are required in every case heard, which are fact- and document-intensive. In addition, the Court must address complex issues of statutory construction, procedure, and constitutional interpretation. Finally, more than 98% of the Court s caseload involves disputes over of the value, classification, or exemption from taxes of real property ranging from personal residences to vast industrial complexes in which the parties present the Court with lengthy and detailed analyses of property usage, comparable sales, replacement costs, and the income-producing potential of the property. The Court has never had law clerks. (By comparison, Minnesota s district court judges typically have 1 or 2 law clerks.) The Governor recommends increasing the Court s budget to fund the hiring of two full-time judicial law clerks to improve the efficiency of the Court by: handling routine scheduling matters; preparing cases for hearings and trials; conducting legal research; assisting in drafting findings of fact and conclusions of law; and checking the Court s decisions for factual and legal accuracy. Nor has the Court had access to modern electronic legal research tools, even to research its own prior rulings. The Governor recommends increasing the Court s budget to fund access to Westlaw, an electronic database of state and federal cases and statutes that because of its efficiency and accuracy is essential to the proper operation of any court. Finally, deciding valuation cases requires understanding and correctly evaluating complex analyses of market-driven value. The Governor recommends increasing the Court s budget to fund continuing legal education for the Court s judges specific to the highly technical issues facing the Court and commensurate with that of the expert appraisers who regularly testify before the Court. Such specialized education is available from only a handful of providers nationwide. Because the addition of law clerks will allow the Court to process cases more promptly and efficiently, the principal performance measure of these funding increases will be the average age of the cases on the Court s docket. There may be no metric by which to measure the specific benefit of access to electronic legal research or specialized continuing education, but it is anticipated that the Court s decisions will be also more fair and accurate as a result. Statutory Change: Not applicable.
Table of Contents 2014-15 Revised Budget - Public Defense Board
Table of Contents 2014-15 Revised Budget - Public Defense Board Agency Profile - Board of Public Defense... 1 Current, Base and Governor's Recommended Expenditures - Rev... 3 Sources and Uses... 4 Governor's
More informationAt A Glance. Contact. Two Year State Budget: $122 million - General Fund
Background PUBLIC DEFENSE BOARD Agency Profile Agency Purpose The Board of Public Defense is a judicial branch agency whose purpose is to provide quality criminal defense services to indigent defendants
More informationSENATE BILL 1486 AN ACT
Senate Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Forty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session 0 SENATE BILL AN ACT AMENDING SECTION -, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY LAWS 00, CHAPTER, SECTION ; AMENDING
More informationSENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE TO H.B. 750 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE TO H.B. 750 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT To amend an Act making and providing appropriations for the State Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2015, and ending June
More informationCITY OF MAPLE VALLEY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION R-12-899
CITY OF MAPLE VALLEY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION R-12-899 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLE VALLEY, WASHINGTON ADOPTING STANDARDS FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES PROVIDED TO THE CITY OF MAPLE
More informationCourt of Claims. House Transportation and Justice Subcommittee. Jamie L. Doskocil, Senior Budget Analyst Legislative Service Commission
Court of Claims House Transportation and Justice Subcommittee Jamie L. Doskocil, Senior Budget Analyst Legislative Service Commission March 29, 2007 Additional copies are available on our web site at www.lsc.state.oh.us
More informationOLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT:
OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of the Olmsted County Attorney to pursue all domestic abuse allegations with zealous, yet discretionary prosecution
More informationGuidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court
Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court Preamble The following are guidelines for attorneys and non-lawyer volunteers appointed as guardians ad litem for children in most family
More informationBENTON COUNTY OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE
BENTON COUNTY OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS JUVENILE DEFENSE CONTRACTS Summary Application deadline is March 25, 2016 but Benton County reserves the right to review and evaluate applications
More informationCONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2055
SESSION OF 2015 CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2055 As Agreed to May 18, 2015 Brief* HB 2055 would amend law related to battery against a law enforcement officer, determination of criminal
More informationCampaign for Justice 403 Seymour, Suite 201 Lansing, MI 48933 info@mijustice.org www.mijustice.org
ELEVEN PRINCIPLES of a Public Defense Delivery System Adopted by the State Bar of Michigan Representative Assembly, April 2002 State Bar of Michigan www.michbar.org Michigan Public Defense Taskforce www.mipublicdefense.org
More information[New] Standard 1. Compensation. Standard 2. Duties and Responsibilities of Counsel. Standard 3. Caseload Limits and Types of Cases
STANDARDS FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE [New] Preamble The Washington Supreme Court adopts the following Standards to address certain basic elements of public defense practice related to the effective assistance
More informationcourt. However, without your testimony the defendant might go unpunished.
Office of State Attorney Michael J. Satz VICTIM RIGHTS BROCHURE YOUR RIGHTS AS A VICTIM OR WITNESS: CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS The stages of the criminal justice system are as follows: We realize that for
More informationCriminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions
Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Accused: Acquittal: Adjudication: Admissible Evidence: Affidavit: Alford Doctrine: Appeal:
More informationCITY OF EDMONDS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE ATTORNEYS. The City of Edmonds ( City ), Washington, is requesting proposals from well
CITY OF EDMONDS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE ATTORNEYS The City of Edmonds ( City ), Washington, is requesting proposals from well qualified attorneys interested in providing legal representation
More informationRESOLUTION NO. 424 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
RESOLUTION NO. 424 A RESOLUTION OF THE WOODINVILLE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING PUBLIC DEFENSE STANDARDS, DIRECTING STAFF TO BEGIN A PROCESS TO EVALUATE CASELOAD COUNTS, REVIEW STANDARDS, AND POTENTIAL ADDITIONS
More informationFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief David L. Perry
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief David L. Perry 830 West Jefferson Street 850-644-1234 VICTIMS' RIGHTS BROCHURE YOUR RIGHTS AS A VICTIM OR WITNESS: ------- We realize that for many persons,
More informationLegislative Fiscal Office
Legislative Fiscal Office Ken Rocco Legislative Fiscal Officer Larry Niswender Deputy Legislative Fiscal Officer Budget Information Report 900 Court Street NE H-178 State Capitol Salem, Oregon 97301 Phn:
More informationCalifornia Judges Association OPINION NO. 56. (Issued: August 29, 2006)
California Judges Association OPINION NO. 56 (Issued: August 29, 2006) ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS WHEN A JUDGE OR A MEMBER OF A JUDGE S FAMILY HAS BEEN ARRESTED OR IS BEING PROSECUTED FOR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
More informationColorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE and LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst:
Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE and LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT Drafting Number: Prime Sponsor(s): LLS 15-0042 Rep. Saine; McCann Sen. Cooke; Johnston Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: House
More informationSexual Assault & The Juvenile Court Process A Guide for Victims/Survivors & Their Families
Sexual Assault & The Juvenile Court Process A Guide for Victims/Survivors & Their Families A publication of Connecticut Sexual Assault Crisis Services, Inc. 96 Pitkin Street v East Hartford, CT v 06108
More informationHow To Fund A Mental Health Court
Mental Health Courts: A New Tool By Stephanie Yu, Fiscal Analyst For fiscal year (FY) 2008-09, appropriations for the Judiciary and the Department of Community Health (DCH) include funding for a mental
More informationATTORNEY. City Attorney. Deputy Criminal Division. Deputy Civil Division. Administration. Admin. Support. Administrative Analysis
ATTORNEY MISSION The City Attorney s mission is to enhance public safety, serve justice and vigorously represent the interests of the City of Minneapolis and its residents by holding criminal offenders
More informationA BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
Page 1 of 24 03 HB 770/AP House Bill 770 (AS PASSED HOUSE AND SENATE) By: Representatives Coleman of the 118 th, Porter of the 119 th, Fleming of the 79 th, Smyre of the 111 th, Skipper of the 116 th,
More informationThe NH Court System excerpts taken from http://www.courts.state.nh.us/press/030608guide.pdf
The NH Court System excerpts taken from http://www.courts.state.nh.us/press/030608guide.pdf NH court system: The modern trial and appellate court system in New Hampshire took shape in 1901, when the legislature
More informationCity Attorney. Deputy Criminal Division. Deputy Civil Division. Administration. Admin. Support. Supervising Attorney. Administrative Analysis
CITY ATTORNEY MISSION Our mission is to enhance public safety, serve justice and vigorously represent the interests of the City of Minneapolis and its residents by holding criminal offenders accountable
More informationThe City Attorney s Office has two business lines. They are as follows:
CITY ATTORNEY MISSION Our mission is to enhance public safety, serve justice and vigorously represent the interests of the City of Minneapolis and its residents by holding criminal offenders accountable
More informationSubchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court
Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court Rule 6.610 Criminal Procedure Generally (A) Precedence. Criminal cases have precedence over civil actions. (B) Pretrial. The court, on its own initiative
More informationGeneral District Courts
General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance
More informationThe Texas Judicial System. Criminal Appeals, in Courts of Appeals, in District Courts, in County Courts, in
The Texas Judicial System The judicial power of the State of Texas is derived from Article 5, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution, which provides: The judicial power of this State shall be vested in one
More informationMaryland Courts, Criminal Justice, and Civil Matters
Maryland Courts, Criminal Justice, and Civil Matters Presentation to the New Members of the Maryland General Assembly Department of Legislative Services Office of Policy Analysis Annapolis, Maryland December
More informationThe Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court
The Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court I. General Information The juvenile and domestic relations district court handles cases involving: Juveniles accused of delinquent acts, traffic infractions
More informationCrR 3.1 STANDARDS FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE. [New] Standard 1. Compensation. [Reserved.] Standard 2. Duties and Responsibilities of Counsel
CrR 3.1 STANDARDS FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE [New] Preamble The Washington Supreme Court adopts the following Standards to address certain basic elements of public defense practice related to the effective assistance
More informationCLASS SPECIFICATION DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES/LABOR RELATIONS
CLASS SPECIFICATION Class Code: 17225 Date Est: 10/2011 Last Rev: Last Title Chg: FLSA: Exempt DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES/LABOR RELATIONS DEFINITION Under administrative direction, plans, directs and
More informationJudicial Branch Overview
Judicial Branch Overview Kristina Pickering, Chief Justice James Hardesty, Justice Senate Judiciary Committee February, 2013 Staff Contact: John McCormick 775-687-9813 jmccormick@nvcourts.nv.gov 1 Judicial
More informationPurpose of the Victim/Witness Unit
Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit The Victim/Witness Assistance Division of the Lake County State s Attorney s Office was formed to serve the needs of people like you. The division is meant to ensure
More informationCriminal Justice Study Consensus Questions
1 Criminal Justice Study Consensus Questions Questions correspond to the sections of the study materials. Each question should be answered on the Likert scale of 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3
More informationMINNESOTA S EXPERIENCE IN REVISING ITS JUVENILE CODE AND PROSECUTOR INPUT IN THE PROCESS September 1997
MINNESOTA S EXPERIENCE IN REVISING ITS JUVENILE CODE AND PROSECUTOR INPUT IN THE PROCESS September 1997 In 1991, Minnesota began a major effort to substantially revise the laws governing our juvenile justice
More informationSupreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway New York, New York 10006 (212) 401-0800 (212) 287-1045 FAX
Departmental Disciplinary Committee Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway (212) 401-0800 (212) 287-1045 FAX HOW TO FILE A COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION When you hire a lawyer
More informationSANTA CRUZ COUNTY CRIMINAL DEFENSE CONFLICTS PROGRAM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CRIMINAL DEFENSE CONFLICTS PROGRAM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OVERVIEW The Office of County Counsel administers the County s Criminal Defense Conflicts Program. The Program Administrator
More informationHow To Write A Law In Oklahoma
OKLAHOMA INDIGENT DEFENSE ACT 22 O.S.2001, 1355 A. Sections 1355 through 1369 of this title shall be known and may be cited as the Indigent Defense Act. B. The Oklahoma Indigent Defense System is hereby
More informationMODEL CRIMINAL DEFENSE MENTORING PROGRAM Utah State Bar New Lawyer Training Program
MODEL CRIMINAL DEFENSE MENTORING PROGRAM Utah State Bar New Lawyer Training Program The following is submitted as a Model Mentoring Plan for the criminal defense practice field. It was prepared by an experienced
More informationJuvenile Delinquency Proceedings and Your Child. A Guide for Parents and Guardians
Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings and Your Child A Guide for Parents and Guardians NOTICE TO READER This brochure provides basic information about family court procedures relating to juvenile delinquency
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES 1. Description. The Superior Court of California, County of Orange (Court), offers a voluntary civil mediation program for
More informationMASON COUNTY INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS SUPERIOR AND JUVENILE COURT
MASON COUNTY INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS SUPERIOR AND JUVENILE COURT Ordinance No. ~~q- 09:> WHEREAS, the Washington Legislature mated in RCW 10.101.030 that counties adopt stards for the delivery of public
More informationMAYWOOD, IL JANUARY 30, 2007
TESTIMONY OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS BEFORE THE COOK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGAINST BUDGET CUTS FOR THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER MAYWOOD, IL JANUARY 30, 2007 Martin
More informationTESTIMONY ROBERT M. A. JOHNSON ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY ANOKA, MINNESOTA JUNE 4, 2009 INDIGENT REPRESENTATION: A GROWING NATIONAL CRISIS
TESTIMONY OF ROBERT M. A. JOHNSON ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY ANOKA, MINNESOTA JUNE 4, 2009 ON INDIGENT REPRESENTATION: A GROWING NATIONAL CRISIS TESTIMONY OF ROBERT M.A. JOHNSON FOR THE HOUSE JUDICIARY SUBCOMMITTEE
More informationTitle 15 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -Chapter 23 ALABAMA CRIME VICTIMS Article 3 Crime Victims' Rights
Section 15-23-60 Definitions. As used in this article, the following words shall have the following meanings: (1) ACCUSED. A person who has been arrested for committing a criminal offense and who is held
More informationCHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985
CHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985 Subchapter 6.000 General Provisions Rule 6.001 Scope; Applicability of Civil Rules; Superseded Rules and Statutes (A) Felony Cases. The rules
More informationA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM
A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM HISTORY Michigan s system for attorney discipline has existed in its current form since 1978. With the creation of the State Bar of Michigan
More informationDISTRICT CODE: 211 CRIMINAL OR CIVIL ACTION AGAINST SCHOOL DISTRICT, SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER, EMPLOYEE, OR STUDENT
SCHOOL POLICIES HOPKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT 270 1001 HIGHWAY 7 HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55305 DISTRICT CODE: 211 CRIMINAL OR CIVIL ACTION AGAINST SCHOOL DISTRICT, SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER, EMPLOYEE, OR STUDENT I. PURPOSE
More informationCIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...
CIVIL TRIAL RULES of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS Addendum to Local Rules Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...2 Rule 1.11 Annual Calendar...3
More informationA Summary of Virginia s Crime Victim and Witness Rights Act
A Summary of Virginia s Crime Victim and Witness Rights Act Your Rights and Responsibilities Department of Criminal Justice Services Victims Services Section December 2008 www.dcjs.virginia.gov Table of
More informationCollin Juvenile Board Plan
Collin Juvenile Board Plan Preamble 10/31/2013 To implement the Texas Fair Defense Act (FDA, Acts 2001,77th Leg.), the following Local Rules of Administration are adopted under Texas Local Government code
More informationBattered Women's Legal Advocacy Project, Inc.
Battered Women's Legal Advocacy Project, Inc. Filing Complaints Against Judges This technical assistance packet addresses the problem of how and when to file a complaint against a judge. It is meant to
More informationPlacer County Criminal Justice Policy Committee Criminal Justice Master Planning Project Objectives and Recommendations FINAL - February 10, 2015
s and s # Rec'd # - Text - Background 1.1 The completion of the interior of the courtroom shell attached to the South Placer Adult Complete construction of a courtroom for Correctional facility would result
More informationHOUSE BILL 1305. State of Washington 64th Legislature 2015 Regular Session
H-0.1 HOUSE BILL State of Washington th Legislature 0 Regular Session By Representatives Walkinshaw, Rodne, Jinkins, Kagi, Moscoso, Gregerson, Ormsby, and Riccelli Read first time 01/1/. Referred to Committee
More informationSenate Calendar FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 05, 2016 SENATE CONVENES AT: 11:30 A.M. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Senate Calendar FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 05, 2016 SENATE CONVENES AT: 11:30 A.M. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACTION CALENDAR CONSIDERATION POSTPONED TO WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2016 Page No. H. 187 An act relating to absence
More informationStandards for Indigent Defense Services [With amendments and format updates as of September 22, 2011]
Washington State Bar Association Standards for Indigent Defense Services [With amendments and format updates as of September 22, 2011] STANDARD ONE: Compensation Public defense attorneys and staff should
More informationExternal Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015
External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015 1. There seems to be an extended wait from disposition to sentence where defendants are in jail awaiting the completion of the pre-sentence report. How many
More informationThis chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Alyce Griffin Clarke Drug Court Act.
9-23-1. Short title This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Alyce Griffin Clarke Drug Court Act. HISTORY: SOURCES: Laws, 2003, ch. 515, 1, eff from and after July 1, 2003. 9-23-3. Legislative
More information... North Carolina s Criminal Justice System. A Comparison of Prosecution and Indigent Defense Resources. N.C. Office of Indigent Defense Services
N.C. Office of Indigent Defense Services North Carolina s Criminal Justice System A Comparison of Prosecution and Indigent Defense Resources.......... April 2011 Office of Indigent Defense Services 123
More informationSub. H.B. 9 * 126th General Assembly (As Reported by H. Civil and Commercial Law)
Aida S. Montano Bill Analysis Legislative Service Commission Sub. H.B. 9 * 126th General Assembly (As Reported by H. Civil and Commercial Law) Reps. Oelslager, Flowers, Buehrer, White, Trakas BILL SUMMARY
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction 3 Overview 4 Key Results 5 Performance Plan Results 7 Resource Reallocations 8 Agency Contacts 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Introduction 3 Overview 4 Key Results 5 Performance Plan Results 7 Resource Reallocations 8 Agency Contacts 9 2 INTRODUCTION This report pursuant to Department of Management
More informationTable of Contents 2014-15 Governors Budget - Attorney General. Agency Profile. - Attorney General... 1
Table of Contents 2014-15 Governors Budget - Attorney General Agency Profile. - Attorney General... 1 Current, Base and Governor's Recommended Expenditures... 3 Sources and Uses... 4 All Funds FTE by Activity...
More informationTable of Contents 2016-17 Biennial Budget Attorney General
Table of Contents 2016-17 Biennial Budget Attorney General Agency Profile Attorney General... 1 Administrative Law Section... 2 State Services Section... 3 Public Services Section... 4 Regulatory Law Section...
More informationVirginia Courts In Brief
Virginia Courts In Brief Virginia has the oldest judicial system in America. The judiciary is an indispensable and integral part of our democratic form of government. As John Marshall, a distinguished
More informationAugust 2014 Report No. 14-705
John Keel, CPA State Auditor A Report on Executive Compensation at State Agencies Report No. 14-705 A Report on Executive Compensation at State Agencies Overall Conclusion The decisions of state agencies
More informationProsecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia Transition Into Prosecution Program
Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia Transition Into Prosecution Program Office: Name of Beginning Lawyer: Bar No. Name of Mentor: Bar No. MODEL MENTORING PLAN OF ACTIVITIES AND EXPERIENCES FOR STATE
More informationMARYLAND STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR COURT-APPOINTED LAWYERS REPRESENTING CHILDREN IN CUSTODY CASES
MARYAND JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON FAMILY LAW CUSTODY SUBCOMMITTEE HON. MARCELLA HOLLAND, CHAIR MARYLAND STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR COURT-APPOINTED LAWYERS REPRESENTING CHILDREN IN CUSTODY CASES TEXT
More informationCOMMONWEALTH COURT COLLECTIONS REVIEW APRIL 2013
COMMONWEALTH COURT COLLECTIONS REVIEW APRIL 2013 Review Summary Over the past five years the Commonwealth of Virginia has failed to collect a significant portion of Circuit and District Court fines and
More informationUsing Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics
Using Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics John Scalia, Jr. Statistician Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Federal criminal case processing
More informationMISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2003 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 2605
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2003 By: Senator(s) Hyde-Smith, King, Walden, Chaney, Williamson, Dearing, Posey, Frazier, Turner, Walls To: Judiciary; Appropriations COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE
More informationCHAPTER 2. COLORADO COURT SYSTEM Updated by Honorable Julie E. Anderson
CHAPTER 2 COLORADO COURT SYSTEM Updated by Honorable Julie E. Anderson THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN COLORADO The Colorado Constitution defines the structure and gives the power to the three units that comprise
More informationSeptember 2005 Report No. 06-009
An Audit Report on The Health and Human Services Commission s Consolidation of Administrative Support Functions Report No. 06-009 John Keel, CPA State Auditor An Audit Report on The Health and Human Services
More informationSUBJECT: Department Policy Concerning Charging Criminal Offenses, Disposition of Charges, and Sentencing
TO: FROM: All Federal Prosecutors John Ashcroft Attorney General SUBJECT: Department Policy Concerning Charging Criminal Offenses, Disposition of Charges, and Sentencing INTRODUCTION The passage of the
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson
UNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson What is the Criminal Justice System? The criminal justice system is the system we have in the United States for addressing situations where it is believed
More informationOffice of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Complaints and Investigations Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility 1500 Landmark Towers 345 St. Peter Street St. Paul, MN 55102-1218 (651) 296-3952
More informationSECTION V GOVERNOR S RECOMMENDATIONS BY FUNCTION
SECTION V GOVERNOR S RECOMMENDATIONS BY FUNCTION This section includes a report by budget account of the Governor s recommended level of spending by funding source. In each budget, the recommendation for
More information(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *
House Proposal of Amendment S. 292 An act relating to term probation, the right to bail, medical care of inmates, and a reduction in the number of nonviolent prisoners, probationers, and detainees. The
More informationGETTING THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
GETTING THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ARREST An ARREST starts the criminal justice process. It is called an arrest whether the police officer hands you a summons or puts handcuffs on you and takes
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2012 WI 123 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thomas E. Bielinski, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Thomas
More informationCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND
33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND PART I. (A) No attorney will be assigned to defend any indigent person in a criminal case unless his or her name appears on one of the approved trial counsel lists
More informationDepartment of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2015 Session
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2015 Session HB 1187 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE House Bill 1187 Judiciary (Delegates Carter and Anderson) Public Safety - Law Enforcement Officers
More informationWhat you don t know can hurt you.
What you don t know can hurt you. Why you need a defense lawyer if you are charged with a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor conviction is SERIOUS A misdemeanor is not a minor crime. If you are convicted of a
More informationColorado Revised Statutes 2014 TITLE 20
TITLE 20 DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ARTICLE 1 District Attorneys PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 20-1-101. Bond and oath of district attorney and staff. (1) Every district attorney, before entering upon the duties of
More informationYour Criminal Justice System
Your Criminal Justice System Helpful Information for the Victims and Witnesses of Crime Provided by Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt Victims Services Division 120 SW 10th Ave, 2nd Floor Topeka, KS
More informationCOURT SCHEDULING ISSUES
COURT SCHEDULING ISSUES North Carolina Courts Commission September 23, 2014 Michael Crowell UNC School of Government There are a number of ways in which a court calendar may be disrupted, resulting in
More informationOffice of Personnel Management. Policy Policy Number: Definitions. Communicate: To give a verbal or written report to an appropriate authority.
Citation: Arkansas Code Annotated 21-1-601 through 608, 21-1-610; 21-1-123 and 124 Office of Personnel Management Policy 1 Forms: Fraud Reporting Complaint Form Definitions Adverse action: To discharge,
More informationHON. GEORGE E. PATAKI, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, et al.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE, AND SAMUEL POE, individually and on behalf of all other persons
More informationSTUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER NINE
Multiple Choice Questions STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER NINE 1. Which of the following is a type of case that is often heard by lower level courts? a. Breach of contract b. Federal appeals c. Maritime claims
More informationPLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013.
PLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013. TOYOTA ASSOCIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ( T-ADR ): Summary Description
More informationPUBLIC DEFENDER EXCESSIVE CASELOAD LITIGATION IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
PUBLIC DEFENDER EXCESSIVE CASELOAD LITIGATION IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA I. INTRODUCTION Parker D. Thomson Julie E. Nevins Hogan & Hartson LLP 1. In the past 18 months, the Public Defender for the Eleventh
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LOCAL RULES: ENTRY The following local rules are adopted to govern the practice and procedures of this Court, subject
More information[As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No. 351. By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 1-11
Session of 00 [As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No. By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight - 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure;
More informationPart 3 Counsel for Indigents
Part 3 Counsel for Indigents 77-32-301 Minimum standards for defense of an indigent. (1) Each county, city, and town shall provide for the legal defense of an indigent in criminal cases in the courts and
More informationAN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:
ENROLLED Regular Session, 1997 HOUSE BILL NO. 2412 BY REPRESENTATIVE JACK SMITH AN ACT To enact Chapter 33 of Title 13 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 13:5301 through 5304,
More informationChild Abuse, Child Neglect. What Parents Should Know If They Are Investigated
Child Abuse, Child Neglect What Parents Should Know If They Are Investigated Written by South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center with editing and assistance from the Children s Law Center and the
More informationFAMILY LAW SECTION, STATE BAR OF NEVADA THE STANDARDS FOR BOARD CERTIFIED SPECIALIZATION IN FAMILY LAW
FAMILY LAW SECTION, STATE BAR OF NEVADA THE STANDARDS FOR BOARD CERTIFIED SPECIALIZATION IN FAMILY LAW 1.0 DURATION OF BOARD CERTIFICATION OF SPECIALIZATION IN FAMILY LAW 1.1 Board Certification of Specialization
More informationAdvocates Role in the Criminal Justice System ~~~~~ Presented by: Sandi Matheson
Advocates Role in the Criminal Justice System ~~~~~ Presented by: Sandi Matheson Advocates Role in the Criminal Justice System OBJECTIVES: Upon completion of this module participant will be able to: Understand
More information