8) Mechanism for international Criminal Tribunals Date:
|
|
|
- Thomas Miller
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UNITED NATIONS MICT ( ) 447 ZS Case No.: 8) Mechanism for international Criminal Tribunals Date: Original: MICT April 2015 English THE PRESIDENT OF THE MECHANISM Before: Registrar: Decision of: Judge Theodor Meron, President Mr. John Hocking 8 April 2015 PROSECUTOR v. BERNARD MUNYAGISHARI PUBLIC DECISION ON THIRD REQUEST FOR REVOCATION OF AN ORDER REFERRING A CASE TO THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA The Office of the Prosecutor: Hassan Bubacar JaIlow James J. Arguin Francois X. Nsanzuwera Chelsea Fewkes Bernard Munyagishari: Natacha Fauveau Ivanovic Received by the Registry Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals 08/ :17 ~~-r.
2 446 I, THEODOR MERON, President of the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals ("Mechanism"); NOTING that a chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (" ICTR") referred the case of Mr. Bernard Munyagishari to the authorities of the Republic of Rwanda ("Rwanda") for trial before the High Court of Rwanda,' and thatthe Appeals Chamber of the ICTR, inter alia, affirmed the referral of Mr. Munyagishari's case to Rwanda.' NOTING the first request for revocation of the order referring Mr. Munyagishari' s case to Rwanda submitted by Mr. Munyagishari, acting pro se, and filed on 30 August 2013,3 and the second request for revocation of the order referring Mr. Munyagishari's case to Rwanda submitted by Mr. Munyagishari's former eo-counsel before the ICTR, acting on a pro bono basis, and filed on 21 May 2014,4 which were both dismissed on 13 March 2014 and 26 June 2014, without prejudice to the filing of a new request for revocation, including a request based on issues raised in the First and Second Revocation Requests;" NOTING the third request for revocation of the order referring Mr. Munyagishari's case to Rwanda, submitted by Mr. Munyagishari's former eo-counsel before the ICTR, acting on a pro bono basis, and filed on 3 March 2015,6 in which it is alleged that revocation is warranted because: (i ) Mr. Munyagishari's defence counsel in Rwanda have not been paid;? (ii) the funds Rwandan authorities are offering for conducting Mr. Munyagishari's defence are insufficient.f (iii) the I The Prosecutor v. Bern ard Munyagishari, Case No. ICTR R11bis, Decision on the Prosecutor's Request for Referral of the Case to the Republic of Rwanda, 6 June ("Referral Decision"), pp The referral chamber designated under Rule 1Ibis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ICTR ("Referral Chamber") rendered this decision. 2 Bernard Muny ag ishari v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR AR11 bis, Decision on Bemard Munyagishari's Third and Fourth Motions for Admission ofadditional Evidence and on the Appeals Against the Decision on Referral Under Rule I I bis, 3 May 2013 ("Appeal Decision"), p. 44. See also Bernard Munya gishari v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR AR I Ibis, Decision on Bemard Munyagishari' s Motion for Reconsideration of the Decision on Appeals Against Referral Decision, 8 July 2013; Bern ard Munyagishari v. The Prosecut or, Case No. ICTR AR II bis, Decision on l3emard Munyagishari's Motion for Reconsideration of the 8 July 2013 Decision and for Replacement of Counsel and on the Prosecution's Motion to Strike, 19 July 2013; Bernard Munyagishari v. The Prosecu tor, Case No. ICTR AR 11 bis, Decision on Bernard Munyagishari's Motion for Reconsideration of Prior Reconsideration Decisions, 24 July Requ ete de dessais}sseme nt du transfer: de B. Munyagishari pour violation grave des droits fonda menta ux, filed on 30 August 2013, English translation filed on 26 September (" First Revocation Request"). 4 Requ ete de Bern ard Muny ag ish ari QlIX fins d 'obt enir l 'annulation de l 'ordonnance de renvoi, filed on 21 May 2014, English translation filed on 4 June 2014 (public with confidential annexes) ("Second Revocation Request"). 5 Decision on Request for Revocation of an Order Referring a Case to the Republic of Rwanda, 13 March 2014, p. 3; Decision on Second Request for Revocation of an Order Referr ing a Case to the Republic of Rwanda, 26 June ("Second Revocation Request Decision"), p Requ ete de Bernard Muny agish ari aux fins d 'obtenir T'annulation de I 'ordonnance de renvoi, filed on 3 March 2015, English translation filed on 17 March 2015 ("Third Revocation Request"). A" references herein are to the English translation of the Third Revocation Request. 7 Third Revocation Request, paras. 8, 10, 14,28. See also Third Revocation Request, paras. 6, 9, Third Revocation Request, paras. / Case No. MICT April 20 15
3 445 Rwanda Bar Association ("RBA") has declined to take responsibility for the payment of his appointed defence counsel in Rwanda, passing this responsibility to the Rwandan Ministry of Justice, a non-neutral party with its own interests in the case; 9 (iv) Article 6 of the draft contract on legal aid proposed by the Rwandan Ministry of Justice to Mr. Munyagishari's defence counsel ("Draft Contract") hinders the work of defence counsel and contravenes their freedom of speech;10 and (v) the principle of equality of arms has been violated because the means available to the Rwandan prosecutors are far greater than those available to the defence, such that a fair trial in Rwandaa is IS impossible; 11 NOTI NG that the Office ofthe Prosecutor (" Prosecution") filed a submission on 17 March 2015,12 opposing the Third Revocation Request because: (i) revocation is a remedy of last resort, and the matters raised are still the subject of ongoing negotiations with the Rwandan authorities;13 (i i) the RBA continues to administer the appointment of counsel in legal aid cases and continues to be invested in the contract negotiations with the Rwandan Ministry of Justice, but funding therefor falls within the budgetary competence ofthe Rwandan Ministry of Justice;" and (iii) there has been no violation of the equality of arms and, in any event, there has been no showing that such a violation could not be remedied in the Rwandan courts;" NOTING that Mr. Munyagishari' s former eo-counsel before the ICTR, acting on a pro bono basis, filed a reply on 23 March 20 15,16 in which Mr. Munyagishari reiterates his submissions in the Third Revocation Request and underscores his assertion that revocation is warranted because the situation remains unchanged since the issuance of the Second Revocation Request Decision;17 9 Third Revocation Request, paras Mr. Munyagishari argues specifically that the Rwandan Ministry of Justice is issuing threats of removal of his defence counsel, which threats were substantiated in the case against Mr. Jean Uwinkindi, and which constitute a form of undue intimidation and interference in Mr. Munyagishari's defence case. See Third Revocation Request, para Third Revocation Request, paras. 22. See also Third Revocation Request, para \ Third Revocation Request, paras /2 Prosecutor's Opposition to Bernard Munyagishari' s Third Request for Revocation of Referral Order, 17 March 2015 ("Response"). 13 Response, paras. 2, 4, 6, 8, 15-17, 25-26, 30. See also Response, para. 3, Annex B. The Prosecutor submits that Mr. Munyagishari's claims regarding the language proposed in Article 6 of the Draft Contract are moot because the Draft Contract is still under negotiation; the RBA objected to Article 6 of the Draft Contract prompting the Rwanda Ministry of Justice to remove the contentious language. Response, paras. 2 ' -22, Annex A. 14 Response, paras Response. paras Replique de Bernard Muny agishari a la reponse du Procureur relative a la troisieme requete aux fins d' obtenir I'annulation de I'ordonnance de renvoi, filed on 23 March 2015 (" Reply"). 17 Reply, paras. 5, 7-10, 12. See also Reply, paras Mr. Munyagishari submits that the Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (January 20 J5), 26 February ("January 2015 Monitoring Report") is not yet available on the Mechanism website, and therefore his former eo-counsel before the ICTR, acting on a pro bono basis, has not as yet seen it. Reply, para Case No. MICT-J April 20 15
4 444 NOTING the monitoring reports filed between June 2014 and February 2015 In Mr. M unyagis. hari an s case; 18 relation to RECALLING that the Referral Chamber granted Mr. Munyagishari standing to seek revocation of the order referring his case to Rwanda; 19 CONSIDERING that Rule 14(C) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the Mechanism grants the President of the Mechanism discretion to assign a Trial Chamber to decide, pursuant to Article 6(6) of the Statute of the Mechanism ("Statute"), whether to revoke an order of referral and make a formal request for deferral; CONSIDEIUNG that the gravamen of the Third Revocation Request concerns the funding of Mr. Munyagishari's defence team and its investigations, and certain matters corollary theretor" CONSIDEIUNG that insofar as the funding issues raised by Mr. Munyagishari could impact, infer alia, the adequacy of time and facilities for the preparation of his defence, these are matters of concern to the Mechanism ;" CONSIDEIUNG that insofar as Mr. Munyagishari makes submissions in the Third Revocation Request concerning the payment of his defence team and the Draft Contract, these matters are sti11 the focus of ongoing negotiations and may be subject to further review by the competent Rwandan authorities, including the Rwandan Ministry ofjustice and the RBA,22 and are, accordingly, not ripe for consideration as a basis for revocation pursuant to Article 6(6) of the Statute ;23 18 Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (February 2015), 26 March 2015 ("February 2015 Monitoring Report"); January 2015 Monitoring Report; Second Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (December 2014), 27 January ("Second December 2014 Monitoring Report"); Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (December 2014), 13 January 2015; Second Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (November 2014), 17 December 2014 ("Second November 2014 Monitoring Report"); Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (November 2014), 19 November ("November Monitoring Report"); Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (October 2014), 18 November 20 J4 ("October 2014 Monitoring Report"); Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (September 2014),2 October 2014 ("September 2014 Monitoring Report"); Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (August 2014), 8 September 2014; Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (July 2014), 28 August 2014; Monitoring Report for the Munyagishari Case (June 2014), 16 July 2014 ("June 2014 Monitoring Report"). 19 Referral Decision, p Third Revocation Request, paras See, e.g., Second Revocation Request Decision, p. 3; The Pros ecutor v. Jean Uwinkindi, Case No. MICT-12-25, Decision on Request for Revocation of an Order Referring a Case to the Republic of Rwanda, 12 March 2014, p. 3; Appeal Decision, para. 84; J ean Uwinkindi v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR ARllbis, Decision on Uwinkindi' s Appeal Against the Referral of His Case to Rwanda and Related Motions, 16 December 2011, para. 52. Se e generally Article 6(6) of the Statute. 22 See Third Revocation Request, paras. 6, 10, 15, 22; Reply, paras. 4, 8-9. S ee also Third Revocation Request, paras , Annex 3; Response, paras. 2, 4, 8-12, 15-16, 20-22, 25, Annex A; Reply, para. 7; February 20 J5 Monitoring Report, paras , 43, 59-60; January 2015 Monitoring Report, paras. 6-9, 11-\3, 25-27; Second December 2014 Monitoring Report, paras. 12, 14, 20-25, 29-31; Second November 2014 Monitoring Report, paras. 19, 22, 3 I; Case No. MICT April2015
5 443 NOTING, however, that ] am concerned by the long delay in concluding an agreement on remuneration for Mr. Munyagishari's counsel, and consider that should such a delay continue for a significant period it could give rise to fair trial concerns; FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS, DISMISS the Third Revocation Request, without prejudice to the filing of a new request for revocation, including a request based on issues raised in the Third Revocation Request, should circumstances warrant. Done in English and French, the English version being authoritative. Done this 8th day ofapril 2015, At The Hague, The Netherlands. ~V""- ~ ~ Judge Theodor Meron President (Seal of the MechanismJ November 2014 Monitoring Report, paras. 10, 14, 16; October 2014 Monitoring Report, para. 22; September 2014 Monitoring Report, para. 12; June 20 J4 Monitoring Report, paras. 21,40. Se e also Monitoring Report for the Uwinkindi Case (February 2015), 17 March 2015, paras. 38,40-41,80; Monitoring Report for the Uwinkindi Case (January 2015), 26 February 2015 ("Uwinkindi January 2015 Monitoring Report"), paras. 16, 36-37, 39, note that the Monitoring Reports for the Munyagishari and Uwinkindi Cases indicate that the amount of funding in the Draft Contract is non-negotiable. See, e.g., January 2015 Monitoring Report, para. 27; Uwinkindi January 2015 Monitoring Report, para. 37; Second November 2014 Monitoring Report, para. 22; November 2014 Monitoring Report, para. 6. However neither Mr. Munyagishari's nor the Prosecution's submissions in the Third Revocation Request and Response, respectively, indicate that any portion of the contract is not open to negotiations, and indeed Mr. Munyagishari's submissions imply that the contract is still under discussion. See Third Revocation Request, paras. 6, 10, 15,22; Reply, paras. 4, 8-9. See also Third Revocation Request, paras ; Response, paras. 2, 8-12, 15-16,20 22,25, Annex A; Reply, para Case No. M1CT April 2015
6 TRANSMISSION SHEET FOR FILING OF DOCUMENTS WITH THE MECHANISM FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNALS/ FICHE DE TRANSMISSION POUR LE DEPOT DE DOCUMENTS DEVANT LE MECANISME POUR LES TRIBUNAUX PENAUX INTERNATIONAUX 1- FILING INFORMATION / INFORMATIONS GENERALES Tol A: MICT Registryl Greffe du MTPI [8J Arushal Arusha o The Haguel La Haye Froml [8J Chambersl o Defencel o Prosecutionl o Otherl Autre : De: Chambre Detense Bureau du Procureur Case Namel Prosecutor v, Bernard Munyagishari Case Numberl MICT Affaire: Affaire n": Date Createdl 08 April 2015 Date transmittedl 08 April 2015 No. of Pagesl 5 Date du : Transmis le : Nombre de pages : Original Language I [8J Englishl o Frenchl o Kinyarwanda o B/C/S o Other/Autre Langue de I'original : Anglais Franr;ais (specifylpreciser) : Title of Documentl Titre du document: Decision on third request for revocation of an order referring a case to the Republic of Rwanda Classification Level/ I25J Unclass ifiedl o Ex Parte Defence excludedl Detense exclue Categories de Non classifie o Ex Parte Prosecution excludedl Bureau du Procureur exclu classification: o Confident ial! o Ex Parte R86(H) applicant excludedl Art. 86 H) requerent exclu Confidentiel o Strictly Confidential l Ex Parte Amicus Curiae excludedl Amicus curiae exclu o Ex Parte other exclusionl autre(s) partie(s) exclue(s) Strictement confidentiel (specifylpreciser) : Document typel o Motionl o Submission from partiesl o Indictmentl Type de document: Requete Ecritures deposees par des parties Acte d 'accusation I25J Decisionl o Submission from non-partiesl o Warrantl Decision Ecriiures oeposees par des tiers Mandat o Orderl o Book of Authoritiesl o Notice of Appeall Ordonnance Recueil de sources Acte d'appel o Judqement/ Jugemen tlarret o Affidavitl Declaration sous serment 11- TRANSLATION STATUS ON THE FILING DATE/ ETAT DE LA TRADUCTION AUJOUR DU DEPOT o Translat ion not requiredl La traduction n'est pas requise I25JFiling Party hereby submits only the original, and requests the Registry to translatel La partie tieposente ne soumet que I'original et sollicite que le Greffe prenne en charge la traduction : (Word version of the document is attachedl La version Word est jointe) o Englishl Anglais I25J Frenchl I25J Kinyarwanda o B/C/S o Other/Autre Franr;ais (specifylpreciser) : o Filing Party hereby submits both the original and the translated version for filing, as followsl La partie aeposeote soumet I'original et la version traduite aux fins de depot, comme suit : Original! o Englishl o Frenchl o Kinyarwanda o B/C/S o OtherlAutre Original en Anglais Franr;ais (specifylpreciser) : Translationl o Englishl o Frenchl o Kinyarwanda o B/C/S o OtherlAutre Traduction en Anglais Franr;ais (specifylp reciser) : o Filing Party will be submitting the translated version(s) in due course in the following language(s)1 La partie aeposente soumettra la (Ies) version(s) traduite(s) sous peu, dans la (les) langue(s) suivante(s) : o Englishl Anglais o Frenchl o Kinyarwanda o B/C/S o Other/Autre Franr;ais (specifylpreciser) : Send com plete d transmission shee t to/ Veuillez soumett re cette fiche dument remplie a: lud jciaifilingsary sh [email protected] 0 R/OU!ydiciaIFilingsHagye@un. org Re ~ApriI /R 6~ : A v rii
MICT-12-14-PT 07-05-2014 (734-731) SINGLE JUDGE. Judge Vagn Joensen, Single Judge. Mr. John Hocking THE PROSECUTOR ALOYS NDIMBATI
MICT-12-14-PT 07-05-2014 (734-731) 734 JN UNITED NATIONS Case No. MICT-12-14-PT _ Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals Date: 7 May 2014 ~ Original: English SINGLE JUDGE Before: Registrar: Judge
MICT-12-29-A 06-03-2014 3345 (3345-3342) ZS. Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals Date: IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER
UNITED NATIONS MICT-12-29-A 06-03-2014 3345 (3345-3342) ZS Case No. Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals Date: On gi nut: MICT-12-29-A 5 March 2014 English IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge
MICT-12-21 -PT 07-05-2014 (18-15)
MICT-12-21-PT 07-05-2014 (18-15) 18 ZS UNITED NATIONS Case No. MICT-12-21 -PT _ - Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals Date: 7 May 2014 OriginaL Engli sh SINGLE JUDGE Before: Registrar: Judge
SINGLE JUDGE. III Re. Prosecutor v. Theoneste BAGOSORA et al. Prosecutor v. Protais ZIGIRANY}RAZO
UNITED NATIONS... _._... _--- M I e-f - 12- Z b,2.1-01-2013 ('30 '2 b) Cases No. MICT-12-26 MICT-12-27 30 ~ Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals Datc: 21 January 2013 Original: English SINGLE
MlcT-12-20 06-06-2014 (236-233)
$rlnio N{n{)Ys x^noss s*t6s MlcT-12-20 06-06-2014 (236-233) lnternational Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal P6nal lnternational pour le Rwanda Arusha lnle natiofi al Contarenc Centre P.O. Bgr 6016.
TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Geoffrey Henderson, Presiding Judge Judge Cuno Tarfusser Judge Olga Herrera Carbuccia
ICC-02/11-01/11-711-Red 29-10-2014 1/11 NM T Cour Pénale Internationale ^. International Criminal Court Original: English No.: ICC-02/11-01/11 Date: 29 October 2014 TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Geoffrey
IN TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Bakone Justice Moloto Judge Christoph FIiigge. Mr John Hocking. 1 November 2012 PROSECUTOR
UNITED NATIONS (I) ~ International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since
PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Cuno Tarfusser Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert
ICC-01/05-01/13-680 22-09-2014 1/6 NM PT Original: English No.: ICC-01/05-01/13 Date: PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Cuno Tarfusser Judge Christine Van
DECISION ON DEFENCE MOTION FOR TESTIMONY OF DGH-042 TO BE HEARD VIA VIDEO-CONFERENCE LINK
IT-04-75-T 19198 D19198 - D19194 10 October 2014 MR UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in
TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Geoffrey Henderson, Presiding Judge Judge Olga Herrera Carbuccia Judge Bertram Schmitt
ICC-02/11-01/15-349 27-11-2015 1/26 NM T Cour Pénale Internationale é/yt7\\l International Criminal Court Original: English No.: ICC-02/11-01/15 Date: 27 November 2015 TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Geoffrey
IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER PROSECUTOR DU[KO TADIC APPEAL JUDGEMENT ON ALLEGATIONS OF CONTEMPT AGAINST PRIOR COUNSEL, MILAN VUJIN
UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991
119th Session Judgment No. 3451
Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 119th Session Judgment No. 3451 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the fifth
Guide for applicants to the ICC List of Counsel and Assistants to Counsel
Guide for applicants to the ICC List of Counsel and Assistants to Counsel Please note: It is of utmost importance to fully understand and properly follow the instructions provided in the present guide,
NEW LUMP SUM SYSTEM FOR THE REMUNERATION OF DEFENCE TEAMS AT ICTR
UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal Pénal International pour le Rwanda Arusha International Conference Centre P.O.Box 6016, Arusha, Tanzania - B.P. 6016, Arusha,
Information and Observations on the Scope and Application of Universal Jurisdiction. Resolution 65/33 of the General Assembly
United Nations General Assembly Sixty-seventh Session Sixth Committee Information and Observations on the Scope and Application of Universal Jurisdiction Resolution 65/33 of the General Assembly pursuant
The Challenges of National Prosecutions for International Crimes Canada
The Challenges of National Prosecutions for International Crimes Canada By Joseph Rikhof 1 Introduction In order to explain the challenges of prosecutions for international crimes in Canada, it would be
Regulations of the Office of the Prosecutor ICC-BD/05-01-09. Date of entry into force: 23 th April 2009. Official Journal Publication
Regulations of the Office of the Prosecutor ICC-BD/05-01-09 Date of entry into force: 23 th April 2009 Official Journal Publication 1 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS... 6 Regulation 1 Adoption of these Regulations...6
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATING DISPUTES BETWEEN TWO STATES
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATING DISPUTES BETWEEN TWO STATES 39 OPTIONAL ARBITRATION RULES TWO STATES CONTENTS Introduction 43 Section I. Introductory Rules 45 Scope of Application
8 July 2015 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (Victims of Crime) BILL 2015 GENERAL SCHEME CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY. PART 2 Information for Victims
1 P a g e 8 July version Preamble Head 8 July 2015 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (Victims of Crime) BILL 2015 GENERAL SCHEME 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Expenses CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY
Rules of Procedure and Evidence* **
Rules of Procedure and Evidence* ** * Explanatory note: The Rules of Procedure and Evidence are an instrument for the application of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, to which they
Section 17: Offenses against the Administration of Justice
399 Section 17: Offenses against the Administration of Justice General Very often, the legislation of post-conflict states lacks adequate administration-ofjustice offenses. This section is a relatively
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING October Term, A.D. 2014 In the Matter of the Amendments to the ) Rules of the Supreme Court of Wyoming ) ORDER AMENDING THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF WYOMING
Measuring Policing Complexity: A Research Based Agenda
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject
MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 19 - ATTORNEYS CHAPTER 200 - ADMISSION TO THE BAR. Rule 15.1. SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FOR MILITARY SPOUSE ATTORNEYS
MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 19 - ATTORNEYS CHAPTER 200 - ADMISSION TO THE BAR ADD new Rule 15.1, as follows: Rule 15.1. SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FOR MILITARY SPOUSE ATTORNEYS (a) Definition As used
IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER. Judge Theodor Meron Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti Judge Patrick Robinson Judge William H. Sekule Judge Burton Hall
UNITED NATIONS Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals Case No. Date: Original: MICT-13-51 21 May 2014 English IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Registrar: Decision of: Judge Theodor Meron Judge Jean-Claude
Germany Allemagne Deutschland. Report Q189. in the name of the German Group by Jochen EHLERS, Thorsten BAUSCH and Martin KÖHLER
Germany Allemagne Deutschland Report Q189 in the name of the German Group by Jochen EHLERS, Thorsten BAUSCH and Martin KÖHLER Amendment of patent claims after grant (in court and administrative proceedings,
RÉPONSE DE ÉNERGIE LA LIÈVRE S.E.C. ET D ÉNERGIE BROOKFIELD MARKETING INC. À LA DEMANDE DE RENSEIGNEMENT N o 1 DE LA RÉGIE DE L ÉNERGIE («RÉGIE»)
RÉGIE DE L ÉNERGIE DOSSIER : R-3625-2007 RÉPONSE DE ÉNERGIE LA LIÈVRE S.E.C. ET D ÉNERGIE BROOKFIELD MARKETING INC. À LA DEMANDE DE RENSEIGNEMENT N o 1 DE LA RÉGIE DE L ÉNERGIE («RÉGIE») Page 2 de 7 Question
Case 1:11-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :
Case 111-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- 6/8/15 X In re SHENGDATECH,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL Document 437 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.
Standards of professional responsibility and statement of the essential duties and rights of prosecutors
Standards of professional responsibility and statement of the essential duties and rights of prosecutors adopted by the International Association of Prosecutors on the twenty third day of April 1999 Foreword
NATIONS UNIES HAUT COMMISSARIAT DES NATIONS UNIES AUX DROITS DE L HOMME UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
NATIONS UNIES HAUT COMMISSARIAT DES NATIONS UNIES AUX DROITS DE L HOMME PROCEDURES SPECIALES DU CONSEIL DES DROITS DE L HOMME UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12
Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER
IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) DECISION
SAINT LUCIA IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. SLUHCV2008/0172 BETWEEN: LEN ISHMAEL Claimant And TIMOTHY POLEON RADIO CARIBBEAN 1982 LTD Defendants Appearances:
Archived Content. Contenu archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Davies et al v. Attorney General of the United States et al Doc. 35 JEFF DAVIES and MANUELA DAVIES, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION -vs- Case No. 6:10-cv-1622-Orl-31GJK
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Petitioner/Defendant, v. Case No.: SC09-1045 Lower Case Nos.:4D08-3090; 07-10734 CF10B STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent/Plaintiff. / PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE CONDUCT OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BY THE PROSECUTION AND THE DEFENCE
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE CONDUCT OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BY THE PROSECUTION AND THE DEFENCE A. INTRODUCTION 1. This document lays down the Code of Practice ( Code ) for the conduct of criminal proceedings
INDIANA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT
INDIANA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT PREAMBLE The Indiana Paralegal Association ("IPA") is a professional organization comprised of individual
Negotiated Relationship Agreement between the International Criminal Court and the United Nations. Preamble
Negotiated Relationship Agreement between the International Criminal Court and the United Nations Preamble The International Criminal Court and the United Nations, Bearing in mind the Purposes and Principles
: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In re: ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES GOVERNING : MEDIATION OF MATTERS AND THE
Written Response to Questions from Chairwoman Linda Sanchez for. Heather E. Williams
Written Response to Questions from Chairwoman Linda Sanchez for Heather E. Williams First Assistant Federal Public Defender District of Arizona - Tucson 4 August, 2008 Follow-up to Testimony before the
Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se
Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se Only members of the bar of this Court may appear as counsel in civil cases. Only individuals who are parties in civil cases may represent themselves.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2011
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2011 JON AGEE and SUSAN AGEE, Appellants, v. ROGER L. BROWN, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF HERBERT G. BIRCK and
Archived Content. Contenu archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject
to counsel was violated because of the conflict of interest that existed with his prior attorney
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS: CRIMINAL TERM PART 24 -----------------------------------------------------------------x THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK DECISION AND ORDER Indictment
2016 PA Super 29 OPINION BY JENKINS, J.: FILED FEBRUARY 09, 2016. Michael David Zrncic ( Appellant ) appeals pro se from the judgment
2016 PA Super 29 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MICHAEL DAVID ZRNCIC Appellant No. 764 MDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence March 30, 2015 in the
Archived Content. Contenu archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject
Case 1:09-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A
Case 109-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x FORT WORTH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly
Archived Content. Contenu archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject
Archived Content. Contenu archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject
ANNEX 1. Le Greffe. The Registry
ICC-01/04-01/10-102 -Anx1-Red 24-05-2011 1/5 FB PT Le Greffe The Registry ANNEX 1 Maanweg 174, 2516 AB The Hague, The Netherlands Maanweg 174, 2516 AB La Haye, Pays Bas Telephone Téléphone +31(0)70 515
Naime Ahmeti A DEFENDANT RIGHTS OF THE DEFENDANT IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
Naime Ahmeti A DEFENDANT RIGHTS OF THE DEFENDANT IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS ABSTRACT Rights of the defendant in criminal proceedings are guaranteed by the Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Code of Kosovo,
Archived Content. Contenu archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject
Resolution ICC-ASP/4/Res.1
Resolution ICC-ASP/4/Res.1 Adopted at the 3 rd plenary meeting on 2 December 2005, by consensus ICC-ASP/4/Res.1 Code of Professional Conduct for counsel The Assembly of State Parties, Having regard to
Complying with the FCPA- An Exploration of Ethical Issues Raised by Recent Cases Are the Professional Conduct Rules Any Different?
Complying with the FCPA- An Exploration of Ethical Issues Raised by Recent Cases Are the Professional Conduct Rules Any Different? By Roseann B. Termini, Esq. [email protected] www.fortipublications.com
A. Accredited law school means a law school either provisionally or fully approved and accredited by the American Bar Association.
Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court 38(d) (d) Clinical Law Professors and Law Students 1. Purpose. This rule is adopted to encourage law schools to provide clinical instruction of varying kinds and to facilitate
Administered Arbitration Rules
22 00 11 33 Administered Arbitration Rules HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE ADMINISTERED ARBITRATION RULES Introduction These Rules have been adopted by the Council of the Hong Kong International
Offering Defense Witnesses to New York Grand Juries. Your client has just been held for the action of the Grand Jury. Although you
Offering Defense Witnesses to New York Grand Juries By: Mark M. Baker 1 Your client has just been held for the action of the Grand Jury. Although you have a valid defense, you do not want your client to
THE FIFTH ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL REGION OF TEXAS
THE FIFTH ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL REGION OF TEXAS APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL AS QUALIFIED COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES To be filled in by Region only: Application No. - Received on: By: I,, State Bar Card
Rules of Procedure and Evidence* **
Rules of Procedure and Evidence* ** * Explanatory note: The Rules of Procedure and Evidence are an instrument for the application of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, to which they
HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW CONFÉRENCE DE LA HAYE DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ
HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW CONFÉRENCE DE LA HAYE DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ CONVENTION ON THE SERVICE ABROAD OF JUDICIAL AND EXTRAJUDICIAL DOCUMENTS IN CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL MATTERS
Archived Content. Contenu archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject
Title - Sujet A&E-Carleton Martello Tower Repairs. Solicitation No. - N de l'invitation EC373-162588/A
1 1 RETURN BIDS TO: RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: Bid Receiving Public Works & Government Services Canada/Réception des souissions Travaux publics et Services gouvernementaux Canada 1713 Bedford Row Halifax,
Court of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Bartlett v. Redford, 2012-Ohio-2775.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97606 DIANE BARTLETT PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. LANA REDFORD,
LAW ON MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
LAW ON MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS I GENERAL PROVISIONS Subject and Application of the Law Article 1 This Law shall govern mutual assistance in criminal matters (hereinafter: mutual assistance)
International Criminal Law Services. and
International Criminal Law Services and INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW TRAINING MATERIALS FOR THE EXTRAORDINARY CHAMBERS IN THE COURTS OF CAMBODIA Copyright 2009 by International Criminal Law Services and
Archived Content. Contenu archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject
Veritas Storage Foundation 5.0 Software for SPARC
Veritas Storage Foundation 5.0 Software for SPARC Release Note Supplement Sun Microsystems, Inc. www.sun.com Part No. 819-7074-10 July 2006 Submit comments about this document at: http://www.sun.com/hwdocs/feedback
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR, a Colorado non-profit corporation; COLORADO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM COALITION, a Colorado
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No. 14-0420 Filed May 20, 2015. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Jeffrey A.
CHARLES EDWARD DAVIS, Applicant-Appellant, vs. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-0420 Filed May 20, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE
[Doc. No. 91] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil No. 04-1512 (RBK) v. EQUITY FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC,
NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 17 1
SUBCHAPTER III. CRIMINAL PROCESS. Article 17. Criminal Process. 15A-301. Criminal process generally. (a) Formal Requirements. (1) A record of each criminal process issued in the trial division of the General
Local Rules of the District Courts of Montgomery County, Texas
Local Rules of the District Courts of Montgomery County, Texas Purpose The Local Rules of the District Courts of Montgomery County have as their primary purpose the management of the court dockets sensibly,
NOTICE OF APPEAL., Defendant/Appellant appeals to the Fourth. District Court of Appeal the judgment and sentence entered by the Honorable,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY. CRIMINAL DIVISION: CASE NO: Plaintiff/Appellee, Defendant/Appellant / NOTICE OF APPEAL NOTICE IS GIVEN that,
Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED 2015 May-27 AM 10:35 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
DIRECTIVE ON ACCOUNTABILITY IN CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FOR PUBLIC BODIES. An Act respecting contracting by public bodies (chapter C-65.1, a.
DIRECTIVE ON ACCOUNTABILITY IN CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FOR PUBLIC BODIES An Act respecting contracting by public bodies (chapter C-65.1, a. 26) SUBJECT 1. The purpose of this directive is to establish the
4. LSS may direct that a case enter CCM where factors of the case suggest the need for case management.
CCM Procedures Procedure 1 The Case Management Spectrum 1. LSS provides Criminal Case Management (CCM) for any case anticipated to exceed 20 half days of trial. The level of administration required to
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER ) NOE RODRIGUEZ, ) Complainant, ) 8 U.S.C. 1324b Proceeding ) v. ) OCAHO Case
Travaux publics et Services gouvernementaux Canada. Title - Sujet PROJECT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT. Solicitation No. - N de l'invitation HT396-111411/A
Public Works and Government Services Canada RETURN BIDS TO: RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des soumissions - TPSGC 11 Laurier St. / 11, rue Laurier Place du Portage, Phase
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN 1. AUTHORITY Pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act of 1964 as amended (CJA), Section 3006A of Title 18, United
NO. COA10-1178 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 September 2011. 1. Bail and Pretrial Release bond forfeiture motion to set aside bail agent
NO. COA10-1178 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 6 September 2011 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA EX REL THE GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff, v. Guilford County No. 05 CR 40144 THEODORE DOUGLAS
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) ) v. ) Cr.A. No. 1202020644 ) BRYAN SCHOENBECK, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: December 4, 2014 Decided:
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-4037
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-4037 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. REGGIE ANDRE BECKTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States
Filed to: Trial Chamber Original Language: English. ftfitiluul:/public
00899652 E2361V4/4 BEFORE THE TRIAL CHAMBER EXTRAORDINARY CHAMBERS IN THE COURTS OF CAMBODIA FILING DETAILS Case No: 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC Party Filing: Co-Prosecutors Filed to: Trial Chamber Original
