What Would Yale Do If It Were Taxable?
|
|
|
- Jemima Webb
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 What Would Yale Do If It Were Taxable? Patrick Geddes Lisa Goldberg Stephen Bianchi Aperio Group, LLC Three Harbor Drive, Suite 315 Sausalito, CA Copyright 2014 Aperio Group LLC Aperio v. [Latin] to make clear, to reveal the truth
2 A Much-Admired Asset Allocation 1
3 The Yale Endowment Model Developed and popularized by maverick investor David Swensen, CIO of the Yale endowment Widely envied, widely emulated by other endowments, pensions, and individual investors Predicated on: Diversification Equity bias Alternative (illiquid) investments 2
4 The Yale Endowment Model Source: 2013 Yale Endowment ( 3
5 Swensen Speaks to Investors In Pioneering Portfolio Management: An Unconventional Approach to Institutional Investing, Swensen provides a brief history of endowment funds and explains the purpose of endowment accumulation and the goals for institutional portfolios. He distinguishes between traditional and alternative asset classes, looks at performance evaluation issues and tools, and considers the investment decisionmaking process. Source: Amazon.com 4
6 Swensen Speaks to Investors In Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investment, Swensen reveals why the mutual fund industry as a whole does a disservice to the individual investor. Soft money, 12b-1 fees, overtrading, market timing, and other management practices lower performance and virtually guarantee that most mutual fund returns will fall short of their benchmark. Source: Amazon.com 5
7 Don t Try This at Home Swensen counsels individual investors to avoid the alternative asset classes for which he is so famous Trendy investors often pursue the cocktail-partychatter benefits of commitments to the promise, seldom filled, of actively managed alternatives. Sensible investors avoid the non-core asset classes. David Swensen, Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investing (New York, Simon & Schuster, 2005), 93. Cites inability of individual investors to access top managers 6
8 What Would Yale Do If It Were Taxable? Sea change: emergence of the New Institutionals, who are ultra high net worth investors with access to Yale-level managers Problem: adapt the Yale model for a taxable investor Challenges: Tax treatment varies across taxable investors Identification of reasonable proxies for asset classes Lack of reporting of after-tax returns 7
9 Swenson on Taxes In an industry guilty of many crimes against investors, ignoring the tax consequences of portfolio transactions ranks among the most grievous. David Swensen, Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investing (New York, Simon & Schuster, 2005), 93. 8
10 Another Great Thinker on Taxes Although it is clear to everyone in the industry that after-tax returns are what economically matter to taxable investors, many firms continue to take the view that we can ignore taxes entirely as long as our competitor managers do the same. In our view, this position of intentionally providing less than the best available services to separate account clients is unsustainable in the long run, and borders on a breach of fiduciary responsibility. Dan dibartolomeo, Northfield News, September 2010, p
11 Adapting the Yale Asset Allocation for a Taxable Investor 10
12 Adjusting Expected Returns for Taxes Focus on ultra high net worth investors Assume the highest tax bracket Identify the component of return that is realized Decompose into short- and long-term gains, dividends, ordinary income Apply the relevant tax haircuts Calculate after-tax returns 11
13 Adjusting Expected Returns for Taxes Pre-Tax Weights + Pre-Tax Covariance Matrix Implied Pre-Tax Returns Apply Tax Haircut to Implied Pre-Tax Returns Implied After-Tax Returns Implied After-Tax Returns + Pre-Tax Covariance Matrix After-Tax Weights 12
14 Deriving Implied Expected Returns Inputs Outputs Optimization Returns + Covariance Weights Reverse Optimization Weights + Covariance Returns Based on William F. Sharpe s Imputing Expected Security Returns from Portfolio Composition, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, June 1974 Aperio study 1. Use pre-tax weights to calculate pre-tax returns (reverse optimization) 2. Apply tax haircut to derive after-tax returns 3. With new after-tax returns, use optimizer to calculate new after-tax weights, using standard mean-variance optimization Purpose of reverse optimization: avoid controversy over return expectations 13
15 Asset-Class Weights and Implied Returns for Yale Asset Class Benchmark Yale Pre-Tax Weight Implied Pre- Tax Return Absolute Return DJ Credit Suisse Hedge Fund 17.8% 2.2% World Public Equity MSCI All Country World 15.7% 9.7% Bonds Barclays Aggregate 4.9% 1.5% Natural Resources Goldman Sachs Natural Resources 7.9% 10.7% Real Estate DJ US Real Estate 20.2% 12.3% Private Equity Russell % 11.7% Cash US Treasury Bills 0-3 Month 1.5% 1.5% Sources: Weights from annual report of the Yale Endowment as of December 31, 2013; returns calculated by Aperio Group using reverse optimization. Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. The performance above is hypothetical and does not represent actual performance of the Endowment or any portfolio. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 14
16 Asset-Class Weights and Implied Returns for Yale Asset Class Benchmark Yale Pre-Tax Weight What s going on here? Implied Pre- Tax Return Absolute Return DJ Credit Suisse Hedge Fund 17.8% 2.2% World Public Equity MSCI All Country World 15.7% 9.7% Bonds Barclays Aggregate 4.9% 1.5% Natural Resources Goldman Sachs Natural Resources 7.9% 10.7% Real Estate DJ US Real Estate 20.2% 12.3% Private Equity Russell % 11.7% Cash US Treasury Bills 0-3 Month 1.5% 1.5% Sources: Weights from annual report of the Yale Endowment as of December 31, 2013; returns calculated by Aperio Group using reverse optimization. Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. The performance above is hypothetical and does not represent actual performance of the Endowment or any portfolio. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 15
17 Estimation of Tax Penalty Across Asset Classes Asset Class Ord. Income % of Total Return from Realized Short Gains Realized Long Gains Unrealized Gains Dividend Return Tax Benefit Absolute Return 0% 23% 47% 30% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Active* 0% 23% 47% 30% 2.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed* 0% 0% 0% 100% 2.0% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv.* 0% 0% 0% 100% 2.0% 1.9% Taxable Bonds 100% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% Municipal Bonds 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% Nat. Resources 0% 10% 20% 70% 0.0% 0.0% Real Estate 30% 0% 0% 70% 0.0% 0.0% Private Equity* 0% 0% 30% 70% 2.0% 0.0% Cash 100% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% *For equity strategies, % of Total Return applies to only the non-dividend portion of total return, i.e., gains. For all public and private equity strategies, dividends are assumed to be taxed at qualified dividend rates applied to a constant 2.0% dividend yield. The above estimates are hypothetical and are not based on specific individual investments. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 16
18 Estimation of Tax Penalty Across Asset Classes Asset Class Ord. Income % of Total Return from Realized Short Gains Realized Long Gains Unrealized Gains Dividend Return Tax Benefit Absolute Return 0% 23% 47% 30% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Active* 0% 23% 47% 30% 2.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed* 0% 0% 0% 100% 2.0% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv.* 0% 0% 0% 100% 2.0% 1.9% Taxable Bonds 100% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% Municipal Bonds 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% Nat. Resources 0% 10% 20% 70% 0.0% 0.0% Real Estate 30% 0% 0% 70% 0.0% 0.0% Private Equity* 0% 0% 30% 70% 2.0% 0.0% Cash 100% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% *For equity strategies, % of Total Return applies to only the non-dividend portion of total return, i.e., gains. For all public and private equity strategies, dividends are assumed to be taxed at qualified dividend rates applied to a constant 2.0% dividend yield. The above estimates are hypothetical and are not based on specific individual investments. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 17
19 After-Tax Weights for Yale (low correlation hedge fund index) Returns Weights Yale P/T Yale A/T Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Implied Implied Yale Tax Yale P/T Active Indexed Tax-Adv. Asset Class Return Return Haircut Weight Equity Equity Equity Absolute Return 2.2% 1.7% -0.5% 17.8% 0.0% 0.0% 11.9% Equity, Active 9.7% 7.5% -2.2% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed 9.7% 9.2% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 45.6% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 9.7% 11.1% +1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.4% Bonds* 1.5% 0.9% -0.7% 4.9% 35.0% 25.8% 14.5% Nat. Resources 10.7% 9.7% -1.0% 7.9% 12.2% 0.0% 5.2% Real Estate 12.3% 10.7% -1.6% 20.2% 13.9% 9.0% 2.8% Private Equity 11.7% 10.4% -1.3% 32.0% 38.9% 19.6% 39.1% Cash 1.5% 0.8% -0.7% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 18
20 After-Tax Weights for Yale (low correlation HF index) Assets with the worst tax haircut drop to nothing Returns Weights Yale P/T Yale A/T Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Implied Implied Yale Tax Yale P/T Active Indexed Tax-Adv. Asset Class Return Return Haircut Weight Equity Equity Equity Absolute Return 2.2% 1.7% -0.5% 17.8% 0.0% 0.0% 11.9% Equity, Active 9.7% 7.5% -2.2% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed 9.7% 9.2% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 45.6% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 9.7% 11.1% +1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.4% Bonds* 1.5% 0.9% -0.7% 4.9% 35.0% 25.8% 14.5% Nat. Resources 10.7% 9.7% -1.0% 7.9% 12.2% 0.0% 5.2% Real Estate 12.3% 10.7% -1.6% 20.2% 13.9% 9.0% 2.8% Private Equity 11.7% 10.4% -1.3% 32.0% 38.9% 19.6% 39.1% Cash 1.5% 0.8% -0.7% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 19
21 After-Tax Weights for Yale (low correlation HF index) Looks like a 1960s pension allocation Returns Weights Yale P/T Yale A/T Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Implied Implied Yale Tax Yale P/T Active Indexed Tax-Adv. Asset Class Return Return Haircut Weight Equity Equity Equity Absolute Return 2.2% 1.7% -0.5% 17.8% 0.0% 0.0% 11.9% Equity, Active 9.7% 7.5% -2.2% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed 9.7% 9.2% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 45.6% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 9.7% 11.1% +1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.4% Bonds* 1.5% 0.9% -0.7% 4.9% 35.0% 25.8% 14.5% Nat. Resources 10.7% 9.7% -1.0% 7.9% 12.2% 0.0% 5.2% Real Estate 12.3% 10.7% -1.6% 20.2% 13.9% 9.0% 2.8% Private Equity 11.7% 10.4% -1.3% 32.0% 38.9% 19.6% 39.1% Cash 1.5% 0.8% -0.7% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 20
22 After-Tax Weights for Yale (low correlation HF index) Tax losses allow for more alternatives Returns Weights Yale P/T Yale A/T Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Implied Implied Yale Tax Yale P/T Active Indexed Tax-Adv. Asset Class Return Return Haircut Weight Equity Equity Equity Absolute Return 2.2% 1.7% -0.5% 17.8% 0.0% 0.0% 11.9% Equity, Active 9.7% 7.5% -2.2% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed 9.7% 9.2% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 45.6% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 9.7% 11.1% +1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.4% Bonds* 1.5% 0.9% -0.7% 4.9% 35.0% 25.8% 14.5% Nat. Resources 10.7% 9.7% -1.0% 7.9% 12.2% 0.0% 5.2% Real Estate 12.3% 10.7% -1.6% 20.2% 13.9% 9.0% 2.8% Private Equity 11.7% 10.4% -1.3% 32.0% 38.9% 19.6% 39.1% Cash 1.5% 0.8% -0.7% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% The alts can really prove their value as sources of diversification once the tax problem is solved. *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 21
23 After-Tax Weights for Yale (low correlation HF index) Bonds drop since alts now can reduce risk Returns Weights Yale P/T Yale A/T Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Implied Implied Yale Tax Yale P/T Active Indexed Tax-Adv. Asset Class Return Return Haircut Weight Equity Equity Equity Absolute Return 2.2% 1.7% -0.5% 17.8% 0.0% 0.0% 11.9% Equity, Active 9.7% 7.5% -2.2% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed 9.7% 9.2% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 45.6% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 9.7% 11.1% +1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.4% Bonds* 1.5% 0.9% -0.7% 4.9% 35.0% 25.8% 14.5% Nat. Resources 10.7% 9.7% -1.0% 7.9% 12.2% 0.0% 5.2% Real Estate 12.3% 10.7% -1.6% 20.2% 13.9% 9.0% 2.8% Private Equity 11.7% 10.4% -1.3% 32.0% 38.9% 19.6% 39.1% Cash 1.5% 0.8% -0.7% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 22
24 Correlations Matter 23
25 The Only Free Lunch of Investing Diversification is one of the main attractions of hedge funds and other alternatives The presumption is that alternatives are uncorrelated with core asset classes Is that true? 24
26 Equity/Hedge Fund Correlations Index Benchmark for Absolute Return (hedge funds) Correlation with Equities (MSCI ACWI) DJ Credit Suisse Hedge Fund (low correlation) 0.14 HFRI Fund Weighted Composite (high correlation)
27 Equity/Hedge Fund Correlations Index Benchmark for Absolute Return (hedge funds) Correlation with Equities (MSCI ACWI) DJ Credit Suisse Hedge Fund (low correlation) 0.14 HFRI Fund Weighted Composite (high correlation) 0.88 Alternatives can be correlated with core asset classes 26
28 After-Tax Weights for Yale (high correlation HF index) Returns Weights Yale P/T Yale A/T Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Implied Implied Yale Tax Yale P/T Active Indexed Tax-Adv. Asset Class Return Return Haircut Weight Equity Equity Equity Absolute Return 4.2% 3.3% -0.9% 17.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Active 9.2% 7.1% -2.1% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed 9.2% 8.7% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 45.6% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 9.2% 10.6% +1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% Bonds* 1.5% 0.9% -0.7% 4.9% 35.0% 25.8% 25.6% Nat. Resources 10.2% 9.2% -1.0% 7.9% 12.2% 0.0% 5.8% Real Estate 11.4% 9.9% -1.5% 20.2% 13.9% 9.0% 2.3% Private Equity 11.0% 9.8% -1.2% 32.0% 38.9% 19.6% 41.3% Cash 1.5% 0.8% -0.7% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 27
29 After-Tax Weights for Yale (high correlation HF index) Returns Weights Correlated hedge funds don t add value after tax Yale P/T Yale A/T Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Implied Implied Yale Tax Yale P/T Active Indexed Tax-Adv. Asset Class Return Return Haircut Weight Equity Equity Equity Absolute Return 4.2% 3.3% -0.9% 17.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Active 9.2% 7.1% -2.1% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed 9.2% 8.7% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 45.6% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 9.2% 10.6% +1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% Bonds* 1.5% 0.9% -0.7% 4.9% 35.0% 25.8% 25.6% Nat. Resources 10.2% 9.2% -1.0% 7.9% 12.2% 0.0% 5.8% Real Estate 11.4% 9.9% -1.5% 20.2% 13.9% 9.0% 2.3% Private Equity 11.0% 9.8% -1.2% 32.0% 38.9% 19.6% 41.3% Cash 1.5% 0.8% -0.7% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 28
30 After-Tax Weights for Yale (low correlation HF index) This is what we had before Returns Weights Yale P/T Yale A/T Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Yale A/T: Implied Implied Yale Tax Yale P/T Active Indexed Tax-Adv. Asset Class Return Return Haircut Weight Equity Equity Equity Absolute Return 2.2% 1.7% -0.5% 17.8% 0.0% 0.0% 11.9% Equity, Active 9.7% 7.5% -2.2% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed 9.7% 9.2% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 45.6% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 9.7% 11.1% +1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.4% Bonds* 1.5% 0.9% -0.7% 4.9% 35.0% 25.8% 14.5% Nat. Resources 10.7% 9.7% -1.0% 7.9% 12.2% 0.0% 5.2% Real Estate 12.3% 10.7% -1.6% 20.2% 13.9% 9.0% 2.8% Private Equity 11.7% 10.4% -1.3% 32.0% 38.9% 19.6% 39.1% Cash 1.5% 0.8% -0.7% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 29
31 Volatilities Matter Too: Adjusting a Covariance Matrix for Taxes 30
32 Risk and Expected Return Taxes generate a return penalty But taxes also lead to a smoother (less volatile) return series In the previous examples, we penalized tax-inefficient asset classes with lower return but we did not reward them with lower risk In the examples that follow, we tax-adjust the covariance matrix 31
33 Adjusting a Covariance Matrix for Taxes Pre-Tax Weights + Pre-Tax Covariance Matrix Implied Pre-Tax Returns Apply Tax Haircut to Implied Pre-Tax Returns Implied After-Tax Returns Implied After-Tax Returns + After-Tax Covariance Matrix After-Tax Weights 32
34 Adjusting a Covariance Matrix for Taxes Assume that pre-tax returns of tax-inefficient asset classes and tax haircuts are normally distributed with positive correlation ρ Higher correlation means smoother after-tax returns Sample from the distribution of tax haircuts (conditional on pre-tax returns) Simulate the after-tax return series Estimate the after-tax covariance matrix based on the simulated after-tax return series 33
35 After-Tax Volatilities (low correlation HF index) Change in Annualized Volatilities using A/T Covariance Matrix Asset Class With P/T Covariance Matrix ρ = 0.25 ρ = 0.50 ρ = 0.75 ρ = 1.00 Absolute Return 6.0% -0.3% -0.7% -1.0% -1.3% Equity, Active 17.2% -1.0% -1.9% -2.8% -3.8% Equity, Indexed 17.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 17.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bonds* 4.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Nat. Resources 23.5% -0.6% -1.1% -1.7% -2.2% Real Estate 23.9% -0.8% -1.6% -2.4% -3.2% Private Equity 20.6% -0.4% -0.8% -1.2% -1.5% Cash 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 34
36 After-Tax Volatilities (low correlation HF index) Greater risk reduction in active equity and real estate Change in Annualized Volatilities using A/T Covariance Matrix Asset Class With P/T Covariance Matrix ρ = 0.25 ρ = 0.50 ρ = 0.75 ρ = 1.00 Absolute Return 6.0% -0.3% -0.7% -1.0% -1.3% Equity, Active 17.2% -1.0% -1.9% -2.8% -3.8% Equity, Indexed 17.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 17.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bonds* 4.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Nat. Resources 23.5% -0.6% -1.1% -1.7% -2.2% Real Estate 23.9% -0.8% -1.6% -2.4% -3.2% Private Equity 20.6% -0.4% -0.8% -1.2% -1.5% Cash 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 35
37 After-Tax Weights for Yale (low volatility) Weight shifts to active equity and real estate Change in Weights using A/T Covariance Matrix: Tax-Advantaged Equity Asset Class With P/T Covariance Matrix ρ = 0.25 ρ = 0.50 ρ = 0.75 ρ = 1.00 Absolute Return 11.9% -0.2% -0.6% -3.2% -6.2% Equity, Active 0.0% 0.0% +3.6% +11.3% +20.9% Equity, Indexed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 26.4% -0.2% 1.0% +3.9% +7.6% Bonds* 14.5% -2.5% -5.4% -8.4% -12.2% Nat. Resources 5.2% +0.9% +0.5% -1.3% -3.6% Real Estate 2.8% +3.0% +6.1% +9.7% +13.8% Private Equity 39.1% -1.3% -5.3% -12.2% -20.4% Cash 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 36
38 After-Tax Weights for Yale (low volatility) Tax-advantaged equity is more important than ever Change in Weights using A/T Covariance Matrix: Tax-Advantaged Equity Asset Class With P/T Covariance Matrix ρ = 0.25 ρ = 0.50 ρ = 0.75 ρ = 1.00 Absolute Return 11.9% -0.2% -0.6% -3.2% -6.2% Equity, Active 0.0% 0.0% +3.6% +11.3% +20.9% Equity, Indexed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 26.4% -0.2% 1.0% +3.9% +7.6% Bonds* 14.5% -2.5% -5.4% -8.4% -12.2% Nat. Resources 5.2% +0.9% +0.5% -1.3% -3.6% Real Estate 2.8% +3.0% +6.1% +9.7% +13.8% Private Equity 39.1% -1.3% -5.3% -12.2% -20.4% Cash 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 37
39 Conclusions 38
40 Conclusions Since 2005, when David Swensen counseled individual investors to avoid alternatives, a class of ultra high net worth New Institutional investors has emerged Perhaps the New Institutional investors have access to top managers but unlike the Yale endowment, their gains are still taxable The impact of taxes on asset allocation is dramatic 39
41 Conclusions It may be possible to design an after-tax asset allocation that incorporates the diversification benefits and liquidity premiums of the Yale endowment. However: After-tax investing principles must be incorporated Diversification is essential and cannot be assumed Tax-efficient equity can facilitate the inclusion of diversifying tax-inefficient alternatives regardless of whether after-tax returns are smoother than pre-tax returns 40
42 Thank You 41
43 Appendix 42
44 Asset-Class Correlations Proxy # Asset Class Index Benchmark 1 Low Corr. Absolute Return DJ Credit Suisse Hedge Fund USD 2 High Corr. Absolute Return HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index 3 World Equity - Active MSCI ACWI NR USD 4 World Equity - Tax Neutral MSCI ACWI NR USD 5 World Equity Tax-Advantaged MSCI ACWI NR USD 6 Fixed Income Barclays Aggregate Bond TR 7 Municipal Bonds Barclays Municipal 8 Natural Resources Goldman Sachs Natural Resources 9 Private Equity Russell 2000 TR 10 Real Estate DJ US Real Estate TR USD 11 Cash ML US Treasury Bills 0-3 Mon TR USD Source: Return data from Morningstar Principia for all indices except for proxy #2, from HFRI. For more information on HFRI indices, see Correlations were calculated from monthly pre-tax total return data through
45 Impact of Tax-Adjusted Covariance Matrix on Asset Allocation 44
46 After-Tax Covariance Matrix for Yale (low correlation HF index) Change in Weights using A/T Covariance Matrix: Active Equity Asset Class With P/T Covariance Matrix ρ = 0.25 ρ = 0.50 ρ = 0.75 ρ = 1.00 Absolute Return 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Active 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% +3.2% Equity, Indexed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bonds* 35.0% -3.1% -6.6% -10.4% -15.6% Nat. Resources 12.2% +1.0% +2.2% +3.4% +4.0% Real Estate 13.9% +2.8% +6.1% +9.9% +14.0% Private Equity 38.9% -1.0% -1.7% -3.0% -5.6% Cash 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 45
47 After-Tax Covariance Matrix for Yale (low correlation HF index) Change in Weights using A/T Covariance Matrix: Indexed Equity Asset Class With P/T Covariance Matrix ρ = 0.25 ρ = 0.50 ρ = 0.75 ρ = 1.00 Absolute Return 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Active 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Equity, Indexed 45.6% -8.8% -19.5% -30.6% -42.4% Equity, Tax-Adv. 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bonds* 25.8% -0.6% -1.6% -3.3% -5.7% Nat. Resources 0.0% +2.6% +6.6% +11.0% +15.9% Real Estate 9.0% +3.6% +7.9% +12.9% +18.7% Private Equity 19.6% +3.2% +6.6% +10.0% +13.5% Cash 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 46
48 Advisor Allocation 47
49 After-Tax Weights for Advisor (low correlation HF index) Returns Weights Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Advisor Advisor Sample Sample Advisor Advisor Advisor P/T A/T Advisor Advisor A/T: A/T: A/T: Implied Implied Tax P/T Active Indexed Tax-Adv. Asset Class Return Return Haircut Weight Equity Equity Equity Absolute Return 2.5% 1.9% -0.5% 25.0% 13.8% 11.3% 24.5% Equity, Active 10.9% 8.4% -2.5% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.4% Equity, Indexed 10.9% 10.4% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 51.0% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 10.9% 12.3% +1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.6% Bonds* 1.7% 0.9% -0.7% 20.0% 42.3% 34.1% 23.2% Nat. Resources 12.0% 10.8% -1.1% 5.0% 13.1% 0.0% 5.7% Real Estate 12.9% 11.2% -1.7% 10.0% 8.0% 2.5% 0.0% Private Equity 12.1% 10.8% -1.3% 10.0% 22.9% 1.1% 17.5% Cash 1.5% 0.8% -0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 48
50 After-Tax Weights for Advisor (low correlation HF index) Returns Weights Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Advisor Advisor Sample Sample Advisor Advisor Advisor P/T A/T Advisor Advisor A/T: A/T: A/T: Tax- Implied Implied Tax P/T Active Indexed Adv. Asset Class Return Return Haircut Weight Equity Equity Equity Absolute Return 2.5% 1.9% -0.5% 25.0% 13.8% 11.3% 24.5% Equity, Active 10.9% 8.4% -2.5% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.4% Equity, Indexed 10.9% 10.4% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 51.0% 0.0% Equity, Tax-Adv. 10.9% 12.3% +1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.6% Bonds* 1.7% 0.9% -0.7% 20.0% 42.3% 34.1% 23.2% Nat. Resources 12.0% 10.8% -1.1% 5.0% 13.1% 0.0% 5.7% Real Estate 12.9% 11.2% -1.7% 10.0% 8.0% 2.5% 0.0% Private Equity 12.1% 10.8% -1.3% 10.0% 22.9% 1.1% 17.5% Cash 1.5% 0.8% -0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *Bonds are assumed to be taxable for the pre-tax allocation and tax-exempt municipals for the after-tax portfolios. All distributions from taxexempt bonds are assumed to be tax-exempt, i.e., possible capital gains are ignored. Note: P/T = Pre-Tax, A/T = After-Tax. The above weights and returns are hypothetical and are not based on actual investments. Cash has been constrained in optimization to show a weight of zero. Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 49
51 Disclosure The performance reflected in the tables and charts in this report are hypothetical, show n for illustrative purposes only, and not based on actual investments. Furthermore, they do not reflect the deduction of any management fees or transaction costs, w hich w ould low er performance returns. Hypothetical performance has inherent limitations, and investors may experience investment results materially different from those portrayed. Any forw ard-looking statements or estimates are based on assumptions, and actual returns are expected to vary from any such statements or estimates. No reliance should be placed on any such statements or forecasts w hen making any investment decision. The assumptions and projections displayed are estimates, hypothetical in nature, and meant to serve solely as a guideline. The results and analysis are not guarantees of future results because they are derived from mathematical modeling techniques of the economic and financial markets that may or may not reflect actual conditions and events. The information contained w ithin this presentation w as carefully compiled from sources Aperio believes to be reliable, but w e cannot guarantee accuracy. We provide this information w ith the understanding that w e are not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or tax services. In particular, none of the examples should be considered advice tailored to the needs of any specific investor, and nothing herein is intended to be investment advice. There is risk of loss from an investment in securities, including the risk of loss of principal. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment w ill be profitable or suitable for a particular investor's financial situation or risk tolerance. Asset allocation and portfolio diversification cannot assure or guarantee better performance and cannot eliminate the risk of investment losses. Accordingly, you should not rely solely on the information contained in these materials in making any investment decision, and w e recommend that all investors seek out the services of competent professionals in any of the aforementioned areas Aperio's investment advisory fees are described in Part 2A of its Form ADV. Aperio's investment advisory fees and any other expenses that may be incurred in the management of any account w ill reduce performance results of Aperio clients. The Monte Carlo results do not include management fees. A difference in fees betw een a separate account and an ETF or other strategy could lead to a return benefit low er than those show n. With respect to the description of any investment strategies, simulations, or investment recommendations, w e cannot provide any assurances that they w ill perform as expected and as described in our materials. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Every investment program has the potential for loss as w ell as gain. The value added from the tax-advantaged equity strategy reflect Monte Carlo simulations based on the follow ing assumptions: Time Horizon 10 years Individual Stock Volatility 41% Dividend Yield 2.0% Bid/Ask Spread (round-trip) 0.08% Annual Delisting from Index 4.0% Per-share Commissions $0.01 Expected Market Return 7.0% Due to the complexity of tax law, not every single taxpayer w ill face the situations described herein exactly as calculated or stated, i.e., the examples and calculations are intended to be representative of some but not all taxpayers. Since each investor s situation may be different in terms of income tax, estate tax and asset allocation, there may be situations in w hich the recommendations w ould not apply. Please discuss any individual situation w ith tax and investment advisors first before proceeding. Taxpayers paying low er tax rates than those assumed or w ithout taxable income w ould earn smaller tax benefits from taxadvantaged indexing or even none at all compared to those described. 50
WHAT WOULD YALE DO IF IT WERE TAXABLE?
THE APERIO DIFFERENCE Authors WHAT WOULD YALE DO IF IT WERE TAXABLE? The phenomenal success of Yale's endowment has been an inspiration to many investors. However, if Yale s endowment had to pay the same
Concentrated Stock Diversification Analysis
Concentrated Stock Diversification Analysis Example analysis Three Harbor Drive, Suite 315 Sausalito, CA 94965 (415) 339-4300 www.aperiogroup.com Copyright 2013 Aperio Group LLC Aperio v. [Latin] to make
The Role of Alternative Investments in a Diversified Investment Portfolio
The Role of Alternative Investments in a Diversified Investment Portfolio By Baird Private Wealth Management Introduction Traditional Investments Domestic Equity International Equity Taxable Fixed Income
Indexed ETFs vs. Indexed Separately Managed Accounts: A User s Guide
Indexed ETFs vs. Indexed Separately Managed Accounts: A User s Guide Authors Patrick Geddes, Chief Executive Officer Robert Tymoczko, Head of Portfolio Trading & Analytics Exchange traded funds (ETFs)
Today s bond market is riskier and more volatile than in several generations. As
Fixed Income Approach 2014 Volume 1 Executive Summary Today s bond market is riskier and more volatile than in several generations. As interest rates rise so does the anxiety of fixed income investors
Investment Policy Statement
Investment Policy Statement Prepared on: February 04, 2013 Prepared for: Sample Individual Client 432 Elm St Chicago IL 60630 Executive Summary Client Name: Sample Individual Client Client Type: Individual
John and Katie Winters
John and Katie Winters 360 WEALTH MANAGEMENT -LIFE INS. ASSET December 03, 2012 PREPARED BY: William Wilkinson, CFP ChFC, CLU, CASL, AIF 28170 N. Alma School Parkway Suite 208 Scottsdale, AZ 85262 (480)
IRAs: Four Facts You Should Know
IRAs: Four Facts You Should Know Overview: The decision between contributing to a traditional 2007 IRA and a Roth IRA depends on many factors. The following discusses some of the key concepts to consider
seic.com/institutions
Nonprofit Management Research Panel Liquidity Pool Management for U.S. Colleges and Universities Gain a better understanding of your school s financial risks and the benefits of integrating the investment
The Two Different Benefits of Tax-Loss Harvesting: Direct and Deferred
APERIO RESEARCH The Two Different Benefits of Tax-Loss Harvesting: Direct and Deferred Lisa Goldberg, Pete Hand, and Alan Cummings KEY TAKE-AWAYS Tax-loss harvesting provides benefits through both immediate
Modernizing Portfolio Theory & The Liquid Endowment UMA
Modernizing Portfolio Theory & The Liquid Endowment UMA Michael Featherman, CFA Director of Portfolio Strategies November 2012 Modern Portfolio Theory Definition and Key Concept Modern Portfolio Theory
SAMPLE INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT
SAMPLE INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT 2003 Prepared by: Jay D. Ahlbeck, CLU, ChFC JDA & Associates Securities and Advisory Services offered through Mutual Service Corporation, a Registered Investment Advisor,
Interest Rates and Inflation: How They Might Affect Managed Futures
Faced with the prospect of potential declines in both bonds and equities, an allocation to managed futures may serve as an appealing diversifier to traditional strategies. HIGHLIGHTS Managed Futures have
Robert and Mary Sample
Comprehensive Financial Plan Sample Plan Robert and Mary Sample Prepared by : John Poels, ChFC, AAMS Senior Financial Advisor February 11, 2009 Table Of Contents IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION 1-7 Presentation
CalPERS 457 Plan Target Retirement Date Funds
CalPERS 457 Plan Target Retirement Date s September 30, 2015 Overview Target Retirement Date s (the "" or "s") are a series of diversified funds, each of which has a predetermined underlying asset mix
Federal Tax and Capital Gains: Rates Over Time
Preparing for a World of Higher Taxes Are You Ready? Presented by: Matt Sommer, CFP, CPWA, AIF Director and Senior Retirement Specialist, Retirement Strategy Group C-0610-114 4-30-11 Federal Tax and Capital
Risk-Adjusted Benchmarks Measuring Portfolio Risk Against Return
Risk-Adjusted Benchmarks Measuring Portfolio Risk Against Return In-depth Look at the Science Behind Our Benchmarks If the industry professional presenting this material is associated with a broker dealer
Portfolio Implications of Triple Net Returns. Journal of Wealth Management Forthcoming. Abstract
Portfolio Implications of Triple Net Returns Journal of Wealth Management Forthcoming Peter Mladina Director of Research Waterline Partners 6701 Center Drive West, Suite 955 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310.256.2576
Asset Management Portfolio Solutions Disciplined Process. Customized Approach. Risk-Based Strategies.
INSTITUTIONAL TRUST & CUSTODY Asset Management Portfolio Solutions Disciplined Process. Customized Approach. Risk-Based Strategies. As one of the fastest growing investment managers in the nation, U.S.
Choosing tax-efficient investments
Choosing tax-efficient investments Managing your portfolio to help control your tax bill Investors need to consider many factors in the process of choosing investments. One at the top of many investors
Alternative Investing
Alternative Investing An important piece of the puzzle Improve diversification Manage portfolio risk Target absolute returns Innovation is our capital. Make it yours. Manage Risk and Enhance Performance
RETIREMENT PLANNING GUIDE. Getting you on the right track
RETIREMENT PLANNING GUIDE Getting you on the right track Table of Contents Why is a retirement plan important? 2 How much will you need? 4 How can your retirement plan help? 6 Where should you invest?
Insurance Investment Comparison
Insurance Investment Comparison An Illustration That Compares the Wealth Accumulation Potential Associated with a Universal Life Insurance Policy with a ''Buy-Term-and-Invest-the-Difference'' Approach
Market Risk Capital Disclosures Report. For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2013
MARKET RISK CAPITAL DISCLOSURES REPORT For the quarter ended March 31, 2013 Table of Contents Section Page 1 Morgan Stanley... 1 2 Risk-based Capital Guidelines: Market Risk... 1 3 Market Risk... 1 3.1
MACKENZIE PRIVATE WEALTH COUNSEL
MACKENZIE PRIVATE WEALTH COUNSEL PORTFOLIO ARCHITECTURE SERVICE INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY Mackenzie Private Wealth Counsel Portfolio Architecture Service Investment Philosophy THE IMPORTANCE OF ASSET ALLOCATION
Investment Advisory Agreement
Investment Advisory Agreement For: John Sample IRA Portfolio: Long-Term Growth Financial Advisor: Advisor Name Company Name 307-673-5675 January 10, 2013 ACCOUNT Client Name(s): Title of the Account: John
Assessing Risk Tolerance for Asset Allocation
Contributions Droms Assessing Risk Tolerance for Asset Allocation by William G. Droms, DBA, CFA, and Steven N. Strauss, CPA/PFS William G. Droms, DBA, CFA, is the Powers Professor of Finance in the McDonough
Understanding the taxability of investments
Understanding the taxability of investments Managing your portfolio to help control your tax bill Investors need to consider many factors in the process of choosing investments. One at the top of many
De-Risking Solutions: Low and Managed Volatility
De-Risking Solutions: Low and Managed Volatility NCPERS May 17, 2016 Richard Yasenchak, CFA Senior Vice President, Client Portfolio Manager, INTECH FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE C-0416-1610 12-30-16 AGENDA
PERFORMING DUE DILIGENCE ON NONTRADITIONAL BOND FUNDS. by Mark Bentley, Executive Vice President, BTS Asset Management, Inc.
PERFORMING DUE DILIGENCE ON NONTRADITIONAL BOND FUNDS by Mark Bentley, Executive Vice President, BTS Asset Management, Inc. Investors considering allocations to funds in Morningstar s Nontraditional Bond
Why is Life Insurance a Popular Funding Vehicle for Nonqualified Retirement Plans?
Why is Life Insurance a Popular Funding Vehicle for Nonqualified Retirement Plans? By Peter N. Katz, JD, CLU ChFC This article is a sophisticated analysis about the funding of nonqualified retirement plans.
CMG Managed High Yield Bond Program. 2015 CMG Capital Management Group, Inc.
CMG Managed High Yield Bond Program About CMG CMG is a Registered Investment Advisor located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania founded in 1992 by Stephen Blumenthal. Since our inception, CMG has embraced
Fixed Income Liquidity in a Rising Rate Environment
Fixed Income Liquidity in a Rising Rate Environment 2 Executive Summary Ò Fixed income market liquidity has declined, causing greater concern about prospective liquidity in a potential broad market sell-off
Wealth Management Solutions
Wealth Management Solutions Invest in the Future Life has significant moments. Making sure you re prepared for them is important. But what can you do when the pace of your life leaves you little time to
Dimensional vs. ETF After-Tax Comparison
Dimensional vs. ETF After-Tax Comparison Data as of March 31, 2014 This information is provided for institutional investors and registered investment advisors, and is not intended for public use. Dimensional
Your model to successful individual retirement investment plans
Your model to successful individual retirement investment plans Tim Noonan Managing Director, Capital Markets Insights Russell Investments WWW.RISYMPOSIUM.COM Presented by: Important Information Please
Absolute return investments in rising interest rate environments
2014 Absolute return investments in rising interest rate environments Todd White, Head of Alternative Investments Joe Mallen, Senior Business Analyst In a balanced portfolio, fixed-income investments have
Susan & David Example
Personal Retirement Analysis for Susan & David Example Asset Advisors Example, LLC A Registered Investment Advisor 2430 NW Professional Drive Corvallis, OR 97330 877-421-9815 www.moneytree.com IMPORTANT:
An Alternative to Fixed Rate Bonds
An Alternative to Fixed Rate Bonds Voya Senior Loans Suite offered by Aston Hill Financial Seeks to pay high income in various rate environments One of the world s largest dedicated senior loan teams Five
Taxes and Transitions
Taxes and Transitions THE NEW FRONTIER FOR RETIREMENT PLANNING Wealthy individuals have been hit with their first major tax increase in more than 20 years, with tax hikes on ordinary income, dividends
When rates rise, do stocks fall?
PRACTICE NOTE When rates rise, do stocks fall? The performance of equities and other return-seeking assets in rising and falling interest rate scenarios, January 1970 through September 2013 William Madden,
McKinley Capital U.S. Equity Income Prospects for Performance in a Changing Interest Rate Environment
March 25, 2014 McKinley Capital U.S. Equity Income Prospects for Performance in a Changing Interest Rate Environment This paper analyzes the historic performance of the McKinley Capital Management, LLC
May 1, 2015 as amended June 1, 2015
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR May 1, 2015 as amended June 1, 2015 DATE TARGET FUNDS MyDestination 2005 Fund MyDestination 2015 Fund MyDestination 2025 Fund MyDestination 2035 Fund MyDestination 2045 Fund MyDestination
Enjoy the Benefits of Professional Wealth Management Quantitative InnovationsSM Investment Advisory Program
Enjoy the Benefits of Professional Wealth Management Quantitative InnovationsSM Investment Advisory Program As an individual investor, you have access to more investment options than ever. With these choices,
The IRA opportunity: To Roth or not to Roth?
The IRA opportunity: To Roth or not to Roth? Vanguard research July 2011 Executive summary. The year 2010, which may well go down in IRA history as the year of the Roth, saw three notable legislative changes
Unified Managed Accounts An Investor s Guide
Briefing Unified managed accounts provide a consolidated approach to asset allocation, investment selection, account administration and performance reporting. Unified Managed Accounts An Investor s Guide
Navellier Tactical U.S. Equity Sector Plus
Navellier Tactical U.S. Equity Sector Plus B-063014/NCD-14-846 www.navellier.com Tactical Series 1 U.S. Equity Sector Plus Navellier Tactical U.S. Equity Sector Plus Model a hypothetical example Hypothetical
Investment Portfolio Management and Effective Asset Allocation for Institutional and Private Banking Clients
Investment Portfolio Management and Effective Asset Allocation for Institutional and Private Banking Clients www.mce-ama.com/2396 Senior Managers Days 4 www.mce-ama.com 1 WHY attend this programme? This
TAX-MANAGED SMAS: BETTER THAN ETFS?
September 2015 Rey Santodomingo, CFA Director of Investment Strategy Tax Managed Equities Tim Atwill, Ph.D., CFA Head of Investment Strategy TAX-MANAGED SMAS: BETTER THAN ETFS? Exchange traded funds, or
Single Manager vs. Multi-Manager Alternative Investment Funds
September 2015 Single Manager vs. Multi-Manager Alternative Investment Funds John Dolfin, CFA Chief Investment Officer Steben & Company, Inc. Christopher Maxey, CAIA Senior Portfolio Manager Steben & Company,
Tax-smart ways to save and invest. TIAA-CREF Financial Essentials
Tax-smart ways to save and invest TIAA-CREF Financial Essentials Today s agenda: 1. Finding funds for saving 2. Tax law provisions promoting saving 3. TIAA-CREF savings opportunities 4. TIAA-CREF can help
CONSIDERATIONS WHEN CONSTRUCTING A FOREIGN PORTFOLIO: AN ANALYSIS OF ADRs VS ORDINARIES
THE APERIO DIFFERENCE. Authors Michael Branch, CFA Ran Leshem CONSIDERATIONS WHEN CONSTRUCTING A FOREIGN PORTFOLIO: AN ANALYSIS OF ADRs VS ORDINARIES U.S. investors can capture international equity exposure
Mutual Fund Investing Exam Study Guide
Mutual Fund Investing Exam Study Guide This document contains the questions that will be included in the final exam, in the order that they will be asked. When you have studied the course materials, reviewed
Retirement Balanced Fund
SUMMARY PROSPECTUS TRRIX October 1, 2015 T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund A fund designed for retired investors seeking capital growth and income through investments in a combination of T. Rowe Price
Personal Financial Plan. John & Mary Sample
For Prepared by Donald F. Dempsey Jr. PO Box 1591 Williston, VT 05495 802-764-5815 This presentation provides a general overview of some aspects of your personal financial position. It is designed to provide
Business Owner s Bonus Plan. Producer Guide. For agent/registered representative use only. Not for public distribution.
Business Owner s Bonus Plan Producer Guide For agent/registered representative use only. Not for public distribution. Business Owner s Bonus Plan Producer Guide The Business Owner s Bonus Plan is a personally
Is Your Financial Plan Worth the Paper It s Printed On?
T e c h n o l o g y & P l a n n i n g Is Your Financial Plan Worth the Paper It s Printed On? By Patrick Sullivan and Dr. David Lazenby, PhD www.scenarionow.com 2002-2005 ScenarioNow Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How To Create A Low Correlation Portfolio
The Power of Low-Correlation Investing Wealth Strategies How to think about the core building blocks of your portfolio Smart Investing Begins with Planning Effective investment planning is concrete problem-solving.
SCOTT & WHITE RETIREMENT/401(K) PLAN Plan Number 090337 Plan Information as of 05/16/2015
SCOTT & WHITE RETIREMENT/401(K) PLAN Plan Number 090337 Plan Information as of 05/16/2015 This legally required notice includes important information to help you compare the investment options under your
BRINKER CAPITAL OVERVIEW. Helping You Invest with Confidence
BRINKER CAPITAL OVERVIEW Helping You Invest with Confidence PARTIALLY INVESTED PERIODIC INVESTMENT FULLY INVESTED Unwavering Focus on Investment Excellence For more than 25 years, Brinker Capital has been
Unconstrained Fixed Income
Unconstrained Fixed Income A Dynamic and Flexible Approach to Fixed Income Investing 26th ANNUAL TEXPERS CONFERENCE Global Fixed Income & Liquidity Management March 2015 This material is provided for educational
Mutual Fund Basics. Types of mutual funds. What are the benefits of investing in a mutual fund?
EBNY Financial, LLC Kevin Kautzmann, CFP Certified Financial Planner 80 Fifth Avenue #1403 New York, NY 212-269-2625 [email protected] www.ebnyfinancial.com Mutual Fund Basics Page 1 of 5, see disclaimer
INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT Valued Client
INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT Valued Client August 17, 2010 PREPARED BY: John Ohl Bay Colony Advisors 91 Main St STE 308 Concord, Massachusetts 01742 (978) 369-7200 [email protected] www.baycolonyadvisors.com
Skyline Advisors Wrap Fee Program. Skyline Advisors, Inc. 405 32nd Street, Suite 201 Bellingham, WA 98225
Item 1: Cover Page for Part 2A Appendix 1 of Form ADV: Wrap Fee Program Brochure May 2015 Skyline Advisors Wrap Fee Program Sponsored By: Skyline Advisors, Inc. 405 32nd Street, Suite 201 Bellingham, WA
The Master Statement of Investment Policies and Objectives of The Lower Colorado River Authority Retirement Plan and Trust. Amended June 16, 2015
The Master Statement of Investment Policies and Objectives of The Lower Colorado River Authority Retirement Plan and Trust Amended June 16, 2015 Introduction The Lower Colorado River Authority ( LCRA )
The Michigan Tech Fund STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
The Michigan Tech Fund STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY APPROVED JULY 31,2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 2 Introduction and Purpose... 3 Scope of Policy... 4 Delegation of Responsibilities...
Important Information about your Annuity Investment
Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated Important Information about your Annuity Investment What is an Annuity Contract? An annuity is a contract between you and an insurance company, under which you make a
With Scholar s Edge, New Mexico s 529 College Savings Plan,
With Scholar s Edge, New Mexico s 529 College Savings Plan, You Can Get an Edge When You Save for College Table of Contents 1 3 EDGE 1 A 529 Plan that s almost as smart as your child EDGE 2 Potentially
REIT QUICK FACTS GUIDE
REIT QUICK FACTS GUIDE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS Guidelines for Strategic Portfolio Diversification FINRA-Reviewed Fact Sheets on Stock Exchange-Listed Equity REITs Additional References for Advisors THERE
The Coming Volatility
The Coming Volatility Lowell Bolken, CFA Vice President and Portfolio Manager Real estate Securities June 18, 2015 www.advantuscapital.com S&P 500 Percent Daily Change in Price September 2008 to April
Contents. 1 Asset allocation 2 Sub-asset allocation 3 Active/passive combinations 4 Asset location
ETF Strategies Contents Why ETFs? Strategic uses for ETFs 1 Asset allocation 2 Sub-asset allocation 3 Active/passive combinations 4 Asset location Tactical uses for ETFs 1 Portfolio completion 2 Cash
Roth IRA Conversion and Roth 401(k) Contributions - To Convert or Not?
Roth IRA Conversion and Roth 401(k) Contributions - To Convert or Not? For those that haven't already been inundated by communication regarding this year's one time Roth conversion opportunity, here is
Global Equity Portfolio Construction. Fall 2012
Global Equity Portfolio Construction Fall 2012 INTRODUCTION Investors should thoughtfully construct an equity portfolio by: Identifying the objective Taking a global approach Expanding away from long only
(a) Apply generally accepted investment theories that take into account the historic returns of different asset classes over defined periods of time;
Yes. Since 1998, Financial Engines has provided online advice to individuals in defined contribution plans, and since 2001, we have provided advice on all tax-deferred and taxable account types (including
Part 2A of Form ADV: Firm Brochure
Part 2A of Form ADV: Firm Brochure Item 1 Cover Page ADVISORY PROGRAM BROCHURE For CROWN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC 15851 Dallas Parkway, Suite 600 Addison, TX 75001 (972) 272-2000 www.crowncm.com This brochure
Cash Flow and Asset Analysis
Jim and Sally Sample for: Jim and Sally Sample 04/21/2015 $1,600,000 Assets + Estimated Entry Fee Refund $1,200,000 $800,000 $400,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Total assets at the end of each year Estimated
A Better Approach to Target Date Strategies
February 2011 A Better Approach to Target Date Strategies Executive Summary In 2007, Folio Investing undertook an analysis of Target Date Funds to determine how these investments might be improved. As
Understanding the 2013 Year-End Distributions Table
Understanding the 2013 Year-End Distributions Table Year-end distribution overview Q. What is Fidelity doing this year with regard to providing information on mutual fund distributions to Fidelity fund
Diversified Alternatives Index
The Morningstar October 2014 SM Diversified Alternatives Index For Financial Professional Use Only 1 5 Learn More [email protected] +1 12 84-75 Contents Executive Summary The Morningstar Diversified
Assessing the Risks of a Yield-Tilted Equity Portfolio
Engineered Portfolio Solutions RESEARCH BRIEF Summer 2011 Update 2014: This Parametric study from 2011 is intended to illustrate common risks and characteristics associated with dividendtilted equity portfolios,
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MEMPHIS, INC. INVESTMENT GUIDELINES FOR MONEY MARKET POOL
INVESTMENT GUIDELINES FOR MONEY MARKET POOL discretionary Money Market Pool is expected to pursue their stated investment strategy and follow the investment guidelines and objectives set forth herein.
T. Rowe Price Target Retirement 2030 Fund Advisor Class
T. Rowe Price Target Retirement 2030 Fund Advisor Class Supplement to Summary Prospectus Dated October 1, 2015 Effective February 1, 2016, the T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund and the T. Rowe Price Small-Cap