Field/Customer FAQs. What is the SAFETY Act?
|
|
|
- Melina Richard
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Field/Customer FAQs On April 22, 2015, FireEye, Inc. was issued Certification under the SAFETY Act for its Multi-Vector Virtual Execution (MVX) Engine and Cloud Platform by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Below, please find answers to the most frequently asked questions about this important award: What is the SAFETY Act? The SAFETY Act is a 2002 federal law that created a liability management program for providers of anti-terrorism technologies. The Act creates certain liability limitations for "claims arising out of, relating to, or resulting from an Act of Terrorism" where anti-terrorism products have been deployed. Under the SAFETY Act, certain security product and service providers may apply for liability protections in the form of a SAFETY Act award from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). If awarded SAFETY Act protections, the provider is entitled to specific protections from third-party liability stemming from the use of that product or service in relation to an Act of Terrorism and those liability protections associated with this award flow down to the buyers of these technologies. View the DHS Safety Act website: What is SAFETY Act Certification? SAFETY Act protections can only be earned after successfully completing a comprehensive and rigorous review process administered by DHS. There are two levels of awards available under the SAFETY Act: Designation and Certification. The awards correspond with different levels of liability protection. Certification is the highest level award available under the SAFETY Act. In order for a product or service to become SAFETY Act Certified, the provider must prove to DHS that the product is not only effective, but also that it performs as intended, conforms to set specifications, and is safe for use. What is the practical effect of this SAFETY Act award for FireEye and its customers?
2 There may be significant legal claims and potential liabilities arising from a cyberattack. Should a cyber-attack take place and tort claims be filed against FireEye (as the manufacturer of the product) or our customers (as the user of the product) relating to the use, performance, design etc. of the MVX Engine or Cloud Platform, SAFETY Act certification provides a strong defense up to and potentially including dismissal of such claims. The MVX Engine is a core component of FireEye s appliances and most of FireEye s appliances are designed to connect with its Cloud Platform. Both of these technologies are now SAFETY Act Certified, and FireEye will receive numerous benefits, including: The MVX Engine and Cloud Platform are on the DHS Approved Products List, which is an exclusive roster of highly effective security products and services. When the SAFETY Act is triggered by the DHS Secretary following a cyber-attack, FireEye is entitled to liability and procedural defenses, including: o Exclusive federal jurisdiction; and o A rebuttable presumption of immediate dismissal of all third-party claims based on the alleged failure of the MVX Engine or Cloud Platform that arise out of or relate to the cyber-attack in question. Indeed, the only way to defeat that presumption of dismissal is to show fraud or willful misconduct in the submission of the SAFETY Act application to DHS. And, even if for some reason fraud or willful misconduct is shown, FireEye still receives liability protections that include a maximum cap on damages, a bar on punitive damages and prejudgment interest, a bar on joint and several liability, and a reduction in any award to plaintiffs equal to amounts they receive from other parties (such as victim compensation funds, life insurance policies, etc.). o FireEye s customers, suppliers, vendors, and all others in its supply chain are immune from third-party claims related to any alleged 2
3 failure, or negligent design or implementation of the MVX Engine or Cloud Platform. In other words, FireEye s customers cannot be sued for buying such FireEye products or any alleged failure of these products in a cyber-terrorist attack. o FireEye receives an official seal that it may use on all its marketing material indicating that it has received the Certification award. That s too good to be true. What s the catch? There is no catch per se, but the SAFETY Act may only be invoked in certain circumstances: First, the DHS Secretary has to declare that the cyber-attack in question is an Act of Terrorism. However, under the law, Act of Terrorism is broadly defined. The attack only needs to be 1) unlawful, 2) cause harm, including economic harm in the United States, and 3) the attacker has to use a weapon or other items that are intended to cause such harm. There is no need to demonstrate terrorist motivations or connections to terrorist groups. As such, the SAFETY Act can apply to a broad range of attacks, including state-sponsored or criminal cyber-attacks. Second, the SAFETY Act protections only apply to the products running on the MVX Engine and Cloud technology. This means that if you, as the customer, so materially change FireEye s products that they are no longer the same product that DHS reviewed, the SAFETY Act award may no longer be applicable. It also means that claims unrelated to these certified products are not protected. Third, FireEye s award only protects those MVX Engine and Cloud Platform products purchased from July 1, 2008 and the act of terrorism/cyberattack must have occurred on or after April 22, Lastly, the SAFETY Act only provides for dismissal of third-party claims regulatory and other types of claims can still proceed. What if the DHS Secretary refuses to declare that the SAFETY Act applies after a cyber-attack? 3
4 No official or automatic protections would apply. However, customers will still be able to demonstrate that when the attack occurred, they were using a product that was thoroughly tested and reviewed by DHS, and found to be so useful and effective that it was Certified under the SAFETY Act. This may provide powerful evidence to rebut any claims that they were negligent in the selection of vendors or the design of their security program. Has the SAFETY Act been tested in court? No, the SAFETY Act has never been tested in court. Until recently, the vast majority of SAFETY Act awards were issued for physical security products (like x-ray machines), and we as a nation have fortunately not experienced an event to trigger the SAFETY Act for such products during past years. However, the SAFETY Act is premised on the government contractor defense, a well-established common law defense. The Supreme Court has reviewed and affirmed the government contractor defense, and the SAFETY Act simply represents a codification of these basic principles. Thus, if the SAFETY Act is tested, there is very high confidence that the SAFETY Act will be upheld in federal court. What if the attack originates from or occurs overseas? Could the SAFETY Act protections apply in those situations? Yes, the SAFETY Act can apply even when an attack originates from or actually occurs outside the United States. So long as the attack impacts the United States (either physically or economically) and the ensuing litigation is being decided under U.S. law, both U.S. and international customers may take advantage of the defenses of the SAFETY Act. As a FireEye customer, do I need to do anything to enjoy these SAFETY Act protections? That s the best part you don t! If you are using the MVX Engine or Cloud technologies, the SAFETY Act protections automatically flow down to you, the customer. Are any other cybersecurity products or services SAFETY Act Certified? 4
5 FireEye s MVX Engine and Cloud Platform are the first and only true cybersecurity technologies to be deemed so useful and effective by DHS that they are SAFETY Act Certified. Once again, FireEye has broken new ground with its products. Currently, the following product offerings run on the MVX Engine and Cloud Platform: Network Threat Prevention (NX Series) Threat Prevention (EX Series) Threat Prevention Cloud (ETP) Content Threat Prevention (FX Series) Malware Analysis Platform (AX Series) Mobile Threat Prevention (MTP) This award also applies to older products running the MVX engine, such as MPS. I have more questions! Who can I contact at FireEye? Alexa King, General Counsel: [email protected] Reena Paraguya, Commercial Counsel: [email protected] 5
The Cybersecurity Framework and the SAFETY Act a Primer for Temple Business School
The Cybersecurity Framework and the SAFETY Act a Primer for Temple Business School MARCH 31, 2014 2013 Venable LLP 1 EO 13636: Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Directs to NIST to develop
The SAFETY Act: Providing Critical Liability Protections for Cyber and Physical Security Efforts
white paper APRIL 2014 The SAFETY Act: Providing Critical Liability Protections for Cyber and Physical Security Efforts VENABLE LLP ON CYBERSECURITY LAW CALIFORNIA DELAWARE MARYLAND NEW YORK VIRGINIA WASHINGTON,
Liability Management Evolving Cyber and Physical Security Standards and the SAFETY Act
Liability Management Evolving Cyber and Physical Security Standards and the SAFETY Act JULY 17, 2014 2013 Venable LLP 1 Agenda 1. Security Risks affecting the Maritime Transportation System (MTS) 2. The
Big Data As a Threat? An Alternative Approach to Cybersecurity
Big Data As a Threat? An Alternative Approach to Cybersecurity February 11, 2015 Brian Finch, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Brian Fox, PwC Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Data Breaches and Cyber
NC General Statutes - Chapter 99B 1
Chapter 99B. Products Liability. 99B-1. Definitions. When used in this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) "Claimant" means a person or other entity asserting a claim and, if said claim
Defense of State Employees: LIABILITY AND LAWSUITS. UNCW Office of General Counsel January 2010
Defense of State Employees: LIABILITY AND LAWSUITS UNCW Office of General Counsel January 2010 COMMON CAUSES OF ACTION (or what could we be sued for) Tort claims Contract claims Discrimination/Harassment
trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.
RESULTS Appellate Court upholds decision that malpractice action barred September 2, 2015 The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently upheld a summary judgment obtained by David Overstreet and Mike McCall
Section 304 - What it Means to the United States Government
Guidance for the Healthcare Community Concerning Section 304 of the Homeland Security Act Manufacturers of smallpox vaccine and those healthcare entities under whose auspices the vaccine would be administered
CYBERSECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT
CYBERSECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT Evan Wolff Maida Lerner Peter Miller Kate Growley 233 Roadmap Cybersecurity Risk Overview Cybersecurity Trends Selected Cybersecurity Topics Critical Infrastructure DFARS
PASSIVE SELLER IMMUNITY FROM PRODUCT LIABILITY ACTIONS. House Bill 4 significantly impacted most areas of Texas Tort Law. In the
PASSIVE SELLER IMMUNITY FROM PRODUCT LIABILITY ACTIONS House Bill 4 significantly impacted most areas of Texas Tort Law. In the traditional products liability arena, tort reform affected three major changes:
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. ANSWER ) Defendant. ) )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANS (NAME) (ADDRESS) (CITY, STATE, ZIP) (TELEPHONE) Defendant Pro Se DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ) ) Case No.: Plaintiff,
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY RENEWAL APPLICATION
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. (herein called the Insurer ) LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY RENEWAL APPLICATION NOTICE THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR INSURANCE WRITTEN ON A CLAIMS
Second Annual Conference September 16, 2015 to September 18, 2015 Chicago, IL
Second Annual Conference September 16, 2015 to September 18, 2015 Chicago, IL Using Insurance Coverage to Mitigate Cybersecurity Risks To Warranty and Service Contract Businesses Barry Buchman, Partner
LOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS
LOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS The Concept of Negligence If you have been injured, only an experienced Louisiana personal injury accident attorney can evaluate the unique facts and circumstances
Regulating and Monitoring Private Military and Security Companies in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations. Stephen Mathias 1
Regulating and Monitoring Private Military and Security Companies in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Stephen Mathias 1 Introduction The nature of United Nations (UN) peace operations means that
Personal injury claim" does not include a claim for compensatory benefits pursuant to worker s compensation or veterans benefits.
Wisconsin AB 19 (2013) (a) Personal injury claim" means any claim for damages, loss, indemnification, contribution, restitution or other relief, including punitive damages, that is related to bodily injury
STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION Registration of Crowdfunding Intermediary Application (Form FL-INT) Pursuant to Section 517.12, Florida Statutes GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS An intermediary of
Products Liability: Putting a Product on the U.S. Market. Natalia R. Medley Crowell & Moring LLP 14 November 2012
Products Liability: Putting a Product on the U.S. Market Natalia R. Medley Crowell & Moring LLP 14 November 2012 Overview Regulation of Products» Federal agencies» State laws Product Liability Lawsuits»
2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE DRH11149-TG-5 (12/01) Short Title: Tort Reform Act of 2011. (Public)
H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH-TG- (/01) D Short Title: Tort Reform Act of. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Blust and Daughtry (Primary Sponsors). 1 A BILL TO BE
NOT ACTUAL PROTECTION: ACTUAL INNOCENCE STANDARD FOR CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS IN CALIFORNIA DOES NOT ELIMINATE ACTUAL LAWSUITS AND ACTUAL PAYMENTS
NOT ACTUAL PROTECTION: ACTUAL INNOCENCE STANDARD FOR CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS IN CALIFORNIA DOES NOT ELIMINATE ACTUAL LAWSUITS AND ACTUAL PAYMENTS By Celeste King, JD and Barrett Breitung, JD* In 1998
Defendant has a duty to act as a reasonable person would in like or similar circumstances to avoid causing unreasonable risk of harm to others.
NEGLIGENCE (Heavily Tested) (Write On the Bar): In order for Plaintiff to recover in Negligence, she or he must plead and prove: DUTY, BREACH OF DUTY, ACTUAL CAUSATION, PROXIMATE CAUSATION, AND DAMAGES.
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
NEGLIGENCE: ELEMENT I: DUTY CHAPTER 13
NEGLIGENCE: ELEMENT I: DUTY CHAPTER 13 General Rule on Duty What is a duty? A duty is an obligation or a requirement to conform to a standard of conduct prescribed by law. Consider the following questions.
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL HEALTH SCIENCES PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY PROGRAM OF SELF-INSURANCE Blanket Information Policy Statement for University: Physicians Surgeons Dentists
Unintentional Torts - Definitions
Unintentional Torts - Definitions Negligence The failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise that results in the proximate cause of actual harm to an innocent person.
Federal Securities Law Disclosure Obligations Regarding Governmental Investigations
Federal Securities Law Disclosure Obligations Regarding Governmental Investigations Jared S. Richardson Associate General Counsel & Secretary Trinity Industries, Inc. W. Scott Wallace Partner Haynes and
STATE OF OREGON TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW
STATE OF OREGON TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW Rodney L. Umberger, Jr. Marc M. Carlton Williams Kastner 888 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204 Phone: (503) 228 7967 Email: [email protected]
Negligence: Element III: Proximate Cause. Chapter 15
Negligence: Element III: Proximate Cause Chapter 15 Introduction Proximate Cause. 1) the causation question (cause in fact): Did the defendant cause the plaintiff s injury? 2) The policy question ( a cut-off
Cyber Insurance and Your Data Ted Claypoole, Partner, Womble Carlyle and Jack Freund, PhD, InfoSec Mgr, TIAA-CREF
Cyber Insurance and Your Data Ted Claypoole, Partner, Womble Carlyle and Jack Freund, PhD, InfoSec Mgr, TIAA-CREF October 9, 2013 1 Cyber Insurance Why? United States Department of Commerce: Cyber Insurance
EXECUTIVE ORDER (Language Services in the Courts)
SUPREME COURT No. 2012-05 EXECUTIVE ORDER (Language Services in the Courts) Pursuant to the authority granted to the Chief Justice of the Rhode Island Supreme Court by 8-15-2 of the Rhode Island General
Anti-Bribery and Books & Records Provisions of. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Current through Pub. L. 105-366 (November 10, 1998)
[As of July 22, 2004] Anti-Bribery and Books & Records Provisions of The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Current through Pub. L. 105-366 (November 10, 1998) UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 15. COMMERCE AND TRADE
Cyber-Insurance Metrics and Impact on Cyber-Security
Cyber-Insurance Metrics and Impact on Cyber-Security Sometimes we can... be a little bit more vigorous in using market-based incentives, working with the insurance industry, for example... DHS Secretary
Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994
Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Act No. 68 of 1994 Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Section PART 1 PRELIMINARY TABLE OF PROVISIONS Division 1 Title and commencement Page 1 Short
Discovery in Bad Faith Insurance Claims: State of the Law, Successful Strategies. Teleconference Program Wednesday, March 29, 2006
Discovery in Bad Faith Insurance Claims: State of the Law, Successful Strategies Teleconference Program Wednesday, March 29, 2006 Topic III A. Who is suing? Does it matter? 1. Whether suit is brought by
TABLE OF CONTENTS INSURANCE BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN COLORADO. Exhibit 1A Bad Faith Case Outcomes 2.1 INSURED S REMEDIES LIMITED UNDER CONTRACT LAW
TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 INSURANCE BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN COLORADO Exhibit 1A Bad Faith Case Outcomes Chapter 2 TORT VERSUS CONTRACT REMEDIES 2.1 INSURED S REMEDIES LIMITED UNDER CONTRACT LAW 2.2 EXPANDED
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED and DECREED this is SO ORDERED. The party obtaining this order is responsible for noticing it pursuant to Local Rule 0-1. Dated: September, 0 1 In re: Mortgages Ltd., IN THE UNITED
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association Enacted November 18, 2015 Preamble and Purpose 1.) Background. Under Rule V, Section 5 of the
SAMPLE RETURN POLICY
DISCLAIMER The sample documents below are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is at your own risk, and you should not use any of these sample documents
Terms of Use The Human Face of Big Data Website
Terms of Use The Human Face of Big Data Website Effective Date: September 12 th, 2012 Welcome to The Human Face of Big Data, a project of Against All Odds Productions ( AAOP ). The Human Face of Big Data
Amy S. Harris Shareholder
Shareholder Amy Harris joined Macdonald Devin in 1989 and represents clients in state and federal trial and appellate courts, primarily in insurance defense litigation and insurance coverage. She has served
Paralegal Pitfalls Employment Practices
Paralegal Pitfalls By Mireya A.R. Llaurado Practice Center, The Recorder, May 30, 2007 Employment Practices Most sizable companies and organizations not just law firms understand that paralegals are essential
The New Role of Hospital Boards in the Face of Increased Compliance Risks ------------------ NCHA Trustee Institute
The New Role of Hospital Boards in the Face of Increased Compliance Risks ------------------ NCHA Trustee Institute Matthew Roberts Chair, Health Care Practice Group Nexsen Pruet, LLC [email protected]
Preparing a Federal Case
Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Preparing a Federal Case If you are reading this, you are probably proceeding on your own in court without the help of an attorney. This is often called
Sharing Cybersecurity Threat Info With the Government -- Should You Be Afraid To Do So?
Sharing Cybersecurity Threat Info With the Government -- Should You Be Afraid To Do So? Bruce Heiman K&L Gates September 10, 2015 [email protected] (202) 661-3935 Why share information? Prevention
Cyber-insurance: Understanding Your Risks
Cyber-insurance: Understanding Your Risks Cyber-insurance represents a complete paradigm shift. The assessment of real risks becomes a critical part of the analysis. This article will seek to provide some
WILLIS SPECIAL REPORT: 10K DISCLOSURES HOW TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOM COMPANIES DESCRIBE THEIR CYBER LIABILITY EXPOSURES
WILLIS SPECIAL REPORT: 10K DISCLOSURES HOW TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOM COMPANIES DESCRIBE THEIR CYBER LIABILITY EXPOSURES This special report examines the cyber risk disclosures made by the technology and telecommunications
Policy Options: Limiting Employer Liability When Hiring Individuals Formerly Incarcerated
Policy Options: Limiting Employer Liability When Hiring Individuals Formerly Incarcerated Employers in Philadelphia require skilled and dedicated workers in order to be successful. Returning citizens (those
Minnesota Personal Injury Law: Car Accidents
2009 Minnesota Car Accidents Laws/Statutes Statutes are laws that apply to all citizens and cover a variety of topics, including the following: the legislature, the executive branch, state departments,
MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.
,5SEPV Wl0: 3ii /"'LCD JCOURT MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY Robert Jacobsen, -vs- Allstate Insurance Company, Plaintiff, Defendant. Cause No.: ADV-03-201(d) Final Order Approving
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 14-60087 Document: 00512938717 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2015 SUPERIOR
Suzanne Kupsch. Dawson Chambers Room 5, 405 Little Bourke Street Melbourne Victoria T: + 61 3 9229 5022 List Y: +61 3 9225 6777
Suzanne Kupsch Dawson Chambers Room 5, 405 Little Bourke Street Melbourne Victoria T: + 61 3 9229 5022 List Y: +61 3 9225 6777 Admission Admitted to practice as a barrister & solicitor on 6 March 2000
EX PARTE PETITION FOR ORDER TO RELEASE MEDICAL RECORDS
EX PARTE PETITION FOR ORDER TO RELEASE MEDICAL RECORDS PR 2 The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501 EX PARTE PETITION FOR ORDER TO RELEASE MEDICAL
Chapter 7 Tort Law and Product Liability
Chapter 7 Tort Law and Product Liability Chapter Outline 1. Introduction 2. The Basis of Tort Law 3. Intentional Torts 4. Negligence 5. Cyber Torts: Defamation Online 6. Strict Liability 7. Product Liability
Lawyer Liability for Assisting in Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Privilege or Peril?
Fall 2006 Oregon State Bar Litigation Journal Lawyer Liability for Assisting in Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Privilege or Peril? By Mark J. Fucile Fucile & Reising LLP On September 8, the Oregon Supreme Court
Settling a False Claims Act Case: Practicalities and Pitfalls
Settling a False Claims Act Case: Practicalities and Pitfalls Brian A. Hill [email protected] Jeffrey M. Hahn [email protected] Overview Because the vast majority of FCA cases are settled, every FCA practitioner
Workplace Related Injuries
Workplace Related Injuries A Discussion of the Relevant Provisions of New York State Labor Law By: WARREN S. KOSTER, ESQ. CALLAN, REGENSTREICH, KOSTER & BRADY ONE WHITEHALL STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10004
Professional Services Agreement
BY ORDERING OR ACCEPTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FROM TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC. (TASER) YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THIS AGREEMENT AND YOU ACCEPT AND AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE FOLLOWING TERMS
Torts Copyright July, 2006 State Bar of California
Torts Copyright July, 2006 State Bar of California After paying for his gasoline at Delta Gas, Paul decided to buy two 75-cent candy bars. The Delta Gas store clerk, Clerk, was talking on the telephone,
PROTECTING CRITICAL CONTROL AND SCADA SYSTEMS WITH A CYBER SECURITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
PROTECTING CRITICAL CONTROL AND SCADA SYSTEMS WITH A CYBER SECURITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Don Dickinson Phoenix Contact USA P.O. Box 4100 Harrisburg, PA 17111 ABSTRACT Presidential Executive Order 13636 Improving
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
GUIDELINES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF INSURANCE AGENTS - 2010
GUIDELINES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF INSURANCE AGENTS - 2010 PART I - PRELIMINARY Purpose and Authorisation 1. These Guidelines are intended to provide the framework and procedure for the licencing and
INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees
INTRODUCTION INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees By: Maureen S. Binetti, Esq. Christopher R. Binetti, Paralegal Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. When can the investigation which may
Global Guide to Competition Litigation Japan
Global Guide to Competition Litigation Japan 2012 Table of Contents Availability of private enforcement in respect of competition law infringement and jurisdiction... 1 Conduct of proceedings and costs...
