THE SUPPORTING NETWORK: TECHNOLOGIES AND PEOPLE TOWARD NEW PARADIGMS

Transcription

1 THE SUPPORTING NETWORK: TECHNOLOGIES AND PEOPLE TOWARD NEW PARADIGMS DOWNLOAD

2 POPULATION 01 POPULATION, Source: UN-DESA (United Nation - Department of Economic and Social Affairs) World Population Prospect: The 2012 Revision (2013) ,53 x ,7 x ,2 x ,1 x ,6 x 10 9

3 POPULATION 02 POPULATION AGE, 2013 Source: UN-DESA (United Nation - Department of Economic and Social Affairs) World Population Prospect: The 2012 Revision (2013) LESS DEVELOPED REGION MORE DEVELOPED REGION 29% 18% 44% < % > 60 16% 12% 49% < % > 60

4 POPULATION 03 POPULATION AGE, Source: UN-DESA (United Nation - Department of Economic and Social Affairs) World Population Prospect: The 2012 Revision (2013) LESS DEVELOPED REGION 0-24 DEPENDING ON FERTILITY EDUCATION PROGRAMS ,6 x ,7 x ,1 x10 9 > ,5 x ,6 x ,5 x10 9 MORE DEVELOPED REGION, ,2 x ,2 x10 9 0,2 x ,2 x ,1 x10 9 0,1 x ,6 x ,5 x10 9 0,5 x10 9 > ,3 x10 9 0,4 x10 9 0,4 x10 9

5 POPULATION 04 URBAN POPULATION OF THE, Source: UN-DESA(United Nation - Department of Economic and Social Affairs) World Urbanization Prospect: The 2011Revision (2012) URBAN ,75 x ,35 x ,63 x ,98 x 10 9 RURAL ,79 x ,34 x ,34 x ,34 x ,25 x ,05 x 10 9

6 RESOURCES 05 MATERIAL EXTRACTED AND USED, Source: UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme) GEO-5 (Global Environmental Outlook-5) (2012) Source: EEA (European Envirionmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Material Resources and Waste (2010) x 10 9 t 100 x 10 9 t MATERIAL EXTRACTED AND USED BY CONTINENT, 2007 Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Material Resources and Waste (2010) OCEANIA AFRICA LATIN AMERICA EUROPE NORTH AMERICA ASIA

7 RESOURCES EUROPE 06 EU MATERIALS CONSUMPTION, 2007 Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Material Resources and Waste (2010) ,2 x 10 9 t/year EU MATERIALS CONSUMPTION BY TYPOLOGY, 2007 Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Material Resources and Waste (2010) 52% 23% 21% 04% MINERALS FOSSIL FUELS BIOMASS METALS FOR INDUSTRIAL AND CONSTRUCTION USE

8

9 RESOURCES EUROPE 08 EU PHYSICAL TRADE BALANCE WITH THE REST OF THE, 2008 Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Material Resources and Waste (2010) EXPORTS IMPORTS EXPORTS BIOMASS 126 X 10 6 t MANUFACTURES 207 X 10 6 t FUELS/MINING PRODUCTS 203 X 10 6 t TOTAL TRADE FROM EU TO RoW 397 x 10 6 t (1999) FROM RoW TO EU 1340 x 10 6 t (1999) FROM EU TO RoW 536 x 10 6 t (2008) FROM RoW TO EU 1798 x 10 6 t (2008) IMPORTS BIOMASS 193 X 10 6 t MANUFACTURES 221 X 10 6 t FUELS/MINING PRODUCTS 1384 X 10 6 t

10 WASTE EUROPE 09 EU WASTE GENERATION, 2006 Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Material Resources and Waste (2010) x 10 9 t/year EU WASTE GENERATION BY SOURCE, 2006 Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Material Resources and Waste (2010) 33% 24% 13% CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MINING AND QUARRYING WASTE MANUFACTURING WASTE 08% HOUSHOLDS WASTE 22% OTHER WASTES RESOURCES CONTAINED IN ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT PUT ON THE MARKET IN 2005: 450 X 10 3 t OF COPPER 7 t OF GOLD 1,8 X 10 3 t OF CFCs

11 WASTE EUROPE 10 FINAL DESTINATION OF TOTAL EU WASTE, 2006 Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Material Resources and Waste (2010) 51,5% 43,6% 04,9% LANDFILL RECYCLING INCINERATION

12 LAND 11 LAND-USE Source: UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme) GEO-5 (Global Environmental Outlook-5) (2012) LAND ADDRESSED TO AGRICULTURE 37% TOTAL DRYLAND PASTURE 33 x 10 6 km 2 CROPLAND 15 x 10 6 km 2 LAND ADDRESSED TO FOREST 31% TOTAL DRYLAND 40 x 10 6 km 2

13 LAND EUROPE 12 EU LAND-USE Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Land use (2010) 42% 35% 4,0% 19% AGRICOLTURE FOREST ARTIFICIAL SURFACES OTHERS AGRICOLTURE km 2 FOREST km 2 ARTIFICIAL SURFACES km 2

14 WATER 13 WATER OF THE Source: UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme) GEO-5 (Global Environmental Outlook-5) (2012) 95,7% 02,5% SALT WATER FROZEN MAINLY GREYWATER AND GREENWATER FRESHWATER 66,6% 33,3%

15 WATER 14 WATER-USE, 2010 Source: UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme) GEO-5 (Global Environmental Outlook-5) (2012) 3000 km 3 /year 2000 km 3 /year 800 km 3 /year DOMESTIC INDUSTRY AGRICULTURE GLOBAL WATER CONSUMPTION Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Water resources - quantity and flows (2010) m 3 /year/person

16 WATER EUROPE 15 EU WATER-USE, 2007 Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Water resources - quantity and flows (2010) 45% 22% 21% 12% COOLING IN ENERGY PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY INDUSTRY SOUTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE AGRICULTURE ACCOUNTS FOR MORE THAN A HALF COOLING IN ENERGY PRODUCTION ACCOUNTS FOR MORE THAN A HALF

17 WATER EUROPE 16 EU REAL AND VIRTUAL WATER-USE, 2007 Source: EEA (European Environmental Agency) The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Water resources - quantity and flows (2010) REAL WATER 150 l / day / person VIRTUAL WATER l / day / person

18 TOTAL PRIMARY ENERGY SUPPLY 17 FROM 1971 TO 2011 BY FUEL (Mtoe) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS OTHER 1% BIOFUELS AND WASTE 10% HYDRO 2,3% NUCLEAR 5,1% NATURAL GAS 21,3% OIL 31,5% COAL / PEAT 28,8%

19 TOTAL PRIMARY ENERGY SUPPLY OECD 18 FROM 1971 TO 2011 BY FUEL (Mtoe) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS OTHER 1,5% BIOFUELS AND WASTE 5,2% HYDRO 2,3% NUCLEAR 9,7% NATURAL GAS 25,7% OIL 36,1% COAL / PEAT 19,5%

20 TOTAL FINAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION 19 FROM 1971 TO 2011 BY FUEL (Mtoe) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS OTHER 3,4% ELECTRICITY 17,7% BIOFUELS AND WASTE 12,5% NATURAL GAS 15,5% OIL 40,8% COAL / PEAT 10,1%

21 TOTAL FINAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION OECD 20 FROM 1971 TO 2011 BY FUEL (Mtoe) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS OTHER 1,8% ELECTRICITY 22% BIOFUELS AND WASTE 5% NATURAL GAS 20,0% OIL 47,8% COAL / PEAT 3,4%

22 TOTAL FINAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION 21 FROM 1971 TO 2011 BY REGION (Mtoe) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS BUNKERS 4,0% AFRICA 5,9% NON-OECD AMERICAS 5,1% ASIA 12,5% CHINA 18,4% NON-OECD EUROPE AND EURASIA 8,3% MIDDLE EAST 4,8% OECD 41,0%

23 TOTAL FINAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION OECD 22 FROM 1971 TO 2011 BY REGION (Mtoe) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS OECD EUROPE 33,5% OECD ASIA OCEANIA 15,9% OECD AMERICAS 50,6%

24 CO EMISSIONS 23 FROM 1971 TO 2011 BY REGION (Mt of CO 2 ) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS BUNKERS 3,6% MIDDLE EAST 5,1% NON-OECD EUROPE AND EURASIA 8,7% CHINA 25,5% ASIA 11,1% NON-OECD AMERICAS 3,5% AFRICA 3,1% OECD 39,4%

25 ELECTRICITY GENERATION 24 FROM 1971 TO 2011 BY FUEL (TWh) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS OTHER 4,5% HYDRO 15,8% NUCLEAR 11,7% FOSSIL THERMAL 68% COAL 41,3% GAS 21,9% OIL 4,8%

26 ELECTRICITY GENERATION 25 FROM 1971 TO 2011 BY REGION (TWh) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS AFRICA 3,1% NON-OECD AMERICAS 5,0% ASIA 9,9% CHINA 21,5% NON-OECD EUROPE AND EURASIA 7,8% MIDDLE EAST 3,8% OECD 48,9%

27 TOTAL FINAL ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION 26 FROM 1971 TO 2011 BY SECTOR (Mtoe) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS OTHER 55,8% TRANSPORT 1,6% INDUSTRY 42,6%

28 TOTAL FINAL ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION BY REGION (TWh) Source: IEA (International Energy Agency) - Key World Energy STATISTICS OECD CHINA ASIA NON-OECD MIDDLE EAST AFRICA EUROPE AND EURASIA NON-OECD AMERICAS

29 ICT DEVELOPMENT INDEX (IDI) 28 ICT TRENDS ICT DEVELOPMENTS ARE MATURING IN ALL PARTS OF THE Source: Measuring the Information Society, MIS MILLION HOUSEHOLDS CONNECTED 6.8 BILLION MOBILE-CELLULAR SUBSCRIPTIONS 50% OF POPULATION LIVES WITHIN REACH OF A 3G NETWORK 2 BILLION MOBILE-BROADBAND SUBSCRIPTIONS 2.7 BILLION PEOPLE ONLINE 40%

30 ICT DEVELOPMENT INDEX (IDI) 29 IDI TOP TEN ECONOMIES WITH THE HIGHEST 2012 IDI VALUE Source: Measuring the Information Society, MIS2013 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 REPUBLIC OF KOREA SWEDEN ICELAND DENMARK FINLAND NORWAY NETHERLANDS UK LUXEMBOURG HONG KONG IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE % MOBILE-BROADBAND PENETRATION 97% HOUSEHOLDS CONNECTED 6 OF THE TOP 10 ARE FROM NORTHERN EUROPE #11 AUSTRALIA #12 JAPAN #17 U.S.A. #20 CANADA

31 ICT DEVELOPMENT INDEX (IDI) 30 IDI DYNAMIC COUNTRIES ECONOMIES WITH THE GREATEST IDI RANK/VALUE INCREASE Source: Measuring the Information Society, MIS2013 ESTONIA +6% GROWTH 75% HOUSEHOLDS WITH COMPUTER AND INTERNET ACCESS AT HOME LEBANON +136% GROWTH 12% FIXED-BROADBAND PENETRATION ALBANIA +109% GROWTH 18% WIRELESS-BROADBAND PENETRATION UAE WENT UP 12 PLACES FROM RANK 45 TO RANK 33

32 ICT DEVELOPMENT INDEX (IDI) 31 LEAST CONNECTED COUNTRIES (LCCs) ECONOMIES WITH THE LOWEST IDI VALUES Source: Measuring the Information Society, MIS2013 #119 #121 #129 #148 #157 SUDAN INDIA PAKISTAN MOZAMBIQUE NIGER IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE IDI VALUE THE 39 LCCs REPRESENT A TOTAL POPULATION OF 2.4 BILLION WHICH IS MORE THAN A THIRD OF THE TOTAL POPULATION

33 MEASURING THE COST AND AFFORDABILITY OF BROADBAND 32 FIXED BROADBAND PRICES GOING DOWN, MINIMUM SPEEDS GOING UP Source: Measuring the Information Society, MIS2013 MINIMUM ADVERTISED SPEED IN 2012, PERCENTAGE OF COUNTRIES: Mbit/s Mbit/s Mbit/s Mbit/s Mbit/s Mbit/s FROM 2008 TO 2012 FIXED-BROADBAND PRICES DROPPED: 82% FROM 2008 TO 2012 SPEEDS HAVE GONE UP: FROM 9% TO 27% COUNTRIES OFFERING MINIMUM FIXED-BROADBAND SPEED OF 2 Mbit/s OR ABOVE 7% 14% 16% 18% 21% 20%

34 MEASURING THE COST AND AFFORDABILITY OF BROADBAND 33 FIXED-BROADBAND PRICE DIVIDE LARGE REGIONAL DIFFERENCES PERSIST Source: Measuring the Information Society, MIS2013 FIXED-BROADBAND PRICES AS A PERCENTAGE OF GNI PER CAPITA, 2012: MOST AFFORDABLE, EUROPE 1.5% OF GNI P.C. AVERAGE, 22.1% OF GNI P.C. LEAST AFFORDABLE, AFRICA 64.3% OF GNI P.C. U.S.A. HAS ONE OF THE MOST AFFORDABLE FIXED-BROADBAND PRICES IN THE 0.4% OF GNI P.C. CUBA HAS THE LEAST AFFORDABLE FIXED-BROADBAND PRICE IN THE 386.9% OF GNI P.C.

35 MEASURING THE S DIGITAL NATIVES 34 WHO ARE THE DIGITAL NATIVES? Source: Measuring the Information Society, MIS2013 OUT OF A POPULATION OF 7 BILLION, 363 MILLION ARE DIGITAL NATIVES WHICH CORRESPONDS TO ONLY 5.2% OF THE POPULATION 30% OF THE S YOUTH (15-24 YEAR OLDS) HAVE BEEN ONLINE FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS 5.2%

36 MEASURING THE S DIGITAL NATIVES 35 DIGITAL NATIVES TOP FIVE TOP 5 COUNTRIES WITH THE LARGEST NUMBER/PERCENTAGE OF DIGITAL NATIVES Source: Measuring the Information Society, MIS2013 LARGEST NUMBER OF DIGITAL NATIVES (DN) CHINA U.S.A. 41 ML INDIA 23 ML BRAZIL 20 ML JAPAN 12 ML 75 ML DN AS A % OF TOTAL POPULATION ICELAND 13.9% NEW ZEALAND 13.6% KOREA REP. 13.5% MALAYSIA 13.4% LITHUANIA 13.2% DN AS A % OF YOUTH POPULATION KOREA REP. JAPAN NETHERLANDS FINLAND LATVIA 99.6% 99.5% 98.4% 98.3% 97%

37 MEASURING THE S DIGITAL NATIVES 36 YOUNG AND CONNECTED YOUTH ARE MORE CONNECTED ESPECIALLY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Source: Measuring the Information Society, MIS2013 RATIO OF YOUTH (15-24) INTERNET USAGE TO OVERALL INTERNET USAGE: DEVELOPING 2.0 DEVELOPED THE AMERICAS 1.8 EUROPE 1.3 ARAB STATES 1.8 AFRICA 2.3 CIS 1.8 ASIA & PACIFIC 1.9

38 MEASURING THE S DIGITAL NATIVES 37 FUTURE TRENDS THE NUMBER OF DIGITAL NATIVES IS ON THE RISE Source: Measuring the Information Society, MIS2013 TODAY, GLOBALLY, 56% OF YOUNG INTERNET USERS ARE DIGITAL NATIVES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES LESS THAN ONE IN TWO YOUNG INTERNET USERS ARE DIGITAL NATIVE (47%) IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES 86% OF YOUNG INTERNET USERS ARE DIGITAL NATIVE OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS THE PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS HAS DOUBLED; OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS THE NUMBER OF DIGITAL NATIVES WILL MORE THAN DOUBLE 56%