Internal Evaluation. Aims:

Transcription

1 Aims: Internal Evaluation Continuous quality assurance Optimizing the range of studies, quality of teaching and counselling Planning of long-term strategic development Profile formation of the university Raising transparency in studies and teaching, counselling and mentoring

2 Internal Evaluation Target groups: 1. First-year students (study entrance) 2. Courses 3. Advanced students (3rd and 5th semester) 4. Graduates ~ 5. Lecturers ~ 6. Students who drop out ~ 7. Counselling and mentoring services. ~ = completed / ~ = in progress

3 1. Paper-pencil-survey of first-year students 1. Development of the questionnaire (Aug. 2006) 2. Coordination with the faculties (Aug./Sept. 2006) 3. Survey in the orientation week ( Oct. 2006) 4. Data input (Oct./ Nov. 2006) 5. Analysis (Nov. 2006) 6. Presentation of the results (Nov./Dec. 2006)

4 1. Paper-pencil-survey of first-year students Questionnaire Topics: 1. General information 2. Reasons for choosing the university 3. Support by different information services 4. Reasons for choosing the study programme 5. Expectations regarding the study programme 6. Goals upon completion of the study programme 7. Financing the study 8. Personal comments

5 1. Paper-pencil-survey of first-year students Main results: 1,452 students participated of which 950 Double-Major Bachelor and 461 Single-Major Bachelor students Good job perspectives are important for the choice of the study programme A good structure of the curriculum is important 669 students plan to take part in a Master of Education programme afterwards

6 2. Evaluation of Courses Online survey 1. Development and coordination of the questionnaire 2. Execution of two pilot phases (Stud.IP): 1. Elective courses of faculty III and V ( ) 2. Elective courses of faculty II ( ) 3. Implementation of the Online-Evaluation for the whole university ( ) 4. Feedback of the results to the lecturers 5. Lecturers are able to present the results to their students 6. Global analysis of the data (Nov. 2006) 7. Presentation of the results (Nov./Dec. 2006)

7 2. Evaluation of Courses Online survey Questionnaire Topics: 1. General Data 2. Lecturers Engagement Interaction Support 3. Courses Structure Depth 4. Students Interest / motivation Participation

8 2. Evaluation of Courses Online-questionnairy Main results: 4,415 responses by 1,306 students ( ) Since the lectures have been able to see the results of their courses if at least 4 students had participated In 351 courses the necessary number of 4 participants was reached 163 results were published by the lectures to their students who participated in the evaluation 21 lecturers commented on their results

9 3. Paper-pencil-survey of the advanced students Development of the questionnaire (Dec. 2006) Coordination with the faculties (Jan. 2007) Survey in the last weeks of January (22. Jan. 02. Febr. 2007) Data input (Febr. 2007) Analysis (Febr. 2007) Result presentation (Febr. 2007)

10 3. Paper-pencil-survey of the advanced students Questionnaire Topics: 1. General information 2. Satisfaction with the support by different information services 3. Expectations regarding the study programme 4. Goals upon completion of the study programme 5. Financing the study 6. Personal comments

11 3. Paper-pencil-survey of the advanced students Main results: 523 students of the 3rd semester participated 221 students of the 5th semester participated of which 563 Double-Major Bachelor and 173 Single-Major Bachelor students The students ask for more internships and practical courses Most of the students spend 21 to 30 hours at the university 622 students plan to take part in a Master of Education programme afterwards

12 Thank you for your attention!