CPU Scheduling. Dr. Yingwu Zhu

Transcription

1 CPU Scheduling Dr. Yingwu Zhu

2 Overview In discussing process/threads management and synchronization, we talked about context switching among processes/threads on the ready queue But we have not glossed over the details of exactly which thread is chosen from the ready queue Making this decision is called scheduling In this lecture, we ll look at: The goals of scheduling Starvation Various well-known scheduling algorithms Standard Unix scheduling algorithm

3 Multiprogramming In a multiprogramming system, we try to increase CPU utilization and job throughput by overlapping I/O and CPU activities Doing this requires a combination of mechanisms and policy We have covered the mechanisms Context switching, how and when it happens Process queues and process states Now we ll look at the policies Which process (thread) to run, for how long, etc. We ll refer to schedulable entities as jobs (standard usage) could be processes, threads, etc.

4 Basic Concepts Maximize CPU utilization by multiprogramming CPU I/O Burst Cycle Process execution consists of a cycle of CPU execution and I/O wait CPU burst distribution

5 Alternating Sequence of CPU And I/O Bursts

6 Histogram of CPU-burst Times 1. A large number of short CPU bursts 2. A small number of long CPU bursts

7 CPU Scheduler Selects from among the processes in the ready queue, and allocates the CPU to one of them CPU scheduling decisions may take place when a process: 1. Switches from running to waiting state 2. Switches from running to ready state 3. Switches from waiting to ready 4. Terminates Scheduling under 1 and 4 is nonpreemptive All other scheduling is preemptive (interrupt a running process)

8 Dispatcher Dispatcher module gives control of the CPU to the process selected by the short-term scheduler; this involves: switching context switching to user mode jumping to the proper location in the user program to restart that program Dispatch latency time it takes for the dispatcher to stop one process and start another running

9 Scheduling Criteria CPU utilization keep the CPU as busy as possible Throughput # of processes that complete their execution per time unit Turnaround time amount of time to execute a particular process (from the time of submission to the time of completion) Waiting time amount of time a process has been waiting in the ready queue CPU scheduling does not affect the amount of time during which a process executes or does I/O Response time amount of time it takes from when a request was submitted until the first response is produced, not output (for time-sharing environment/interactive systems)

10 Optimization Criteria Max CPU utilization Max throughput Min turnaround time Min waiting time Min response time Question: Is average good? In some cases, minimizing the maximum response time is better

11 Starvation Starvation is a scheduling non-goal : Starvation is a situation where a process is prevented from making progress because some other process has the resource it requires Resource could be the CPU, or a lock (in readers/writers) Starvation usually a side effect of the scheduling algorithm A high priority process always prevents a low priority process from running on the CPU One thread always beats another when acquiring a lock Starvation can be a side effect of synchronization

12 First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) Scheduling Process Burst Time P 1 24 P 2 3 P 3 3 Suppose that the processes arrive at time 0 in the order: P 1, P 2, P 3 The Gantt Chart for the schedule is: P 1 P 2 P 3 0 Waiting time for P 1 = 0; P 2 = 24; P 3 = 27 Average waiting time: ( )/3 = 17 Nonpreemptive sheduling

13 FCFS Scheduling (Cont.) Suppose that the processes arrive in the order P 2, P 3, P 1 The Gantt chart for the schedule is: P 2 P 3 P Waiting time for P 1 = 6; P 2 = 0 ; P 3 = 3 Average waiting time: ( )/3 = 3 Much better than previous case Convoy effect short process waiting for long process to get off CPU One big CPU-bound process Many I/O-bound processes Lower CPU and device utilization

14 Shortest-Job-First (SJR) Scheduling Associate with each process the length of its next CPU burst. Use these lengths to schedule the process with the shortest time FCFS breaks the tie if two processes have same next CPU burst Two schemes: nonpreemptive once CPU given to the process it cannot be preempted until completes its CPU burst preemptive if a new process arrives with CPU burst length less than remaining time of current executing process, preempt. This scheme is know as the Shortest-Remaining-Time-First (SRTF) SJF is optimal gives minimum average waiting time for a given set of processes

15 Example of Non-Preemptive SJF Process Arrival Time Burst Time P P P P SJF (non-preemptive) P 1 P 3 P 2 P Average waiting time = ( )/4 = 4

16 Example of Preemptive SJF: SRTF Process Arrival Time Burst Time P P P P SJF (preemptive) P 1 P 2 P 3 P 2 P 4 P Average waiting time = ( )/4 = 3

17 Priority Scheduling A priority number (integer) is associated with each process The CPU is allocated to the process with the highest priority (smallest integer highest priority) Preemptive nonpreemptive SJF is a priority scheduling where priority is the predicted next CPU burst time Problem Starvation low priority processes may never execute Solution Aging as time progresses increase the priority of the process

18 Round Robin (RR) Each process gets a small unit of CPU time (time quantum), usually milliseconds. After this time has elapsed, the process is preempted and added to the end of the ready queue. If there are n processes in the ready queue and the time quantum is q, then each process gets 1/n of the CPU time. No process waits more than (n-1)q time units. Note: If a process has a CPU burst of less than 1 time quantum, the process itself will release the CPU voluntarily. The scheduler will then proceed to the next process in the ready queue Performance q large FCFS q small q must be large with respect to context switch, otherwise overhead is too high

19 Time Quantum and Context Switch Time

20 Example of RR with Time Quantum = 20 Process Burst Time P 1 53 P 2 17 P 3 68 P 4 24 The Gantt chart is: P 1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 1 P 3 P 4 P 1 P 3 P Typically, higher average turnaround than SJF, but better response

21 Turnaround Time Varies With The Time Quantum

22 Multilevel Queue Ready queue is partitioned into separate queues: foreground (interactive) background (batch) Each queue has its own scheduling algorithm foreground RR background FCFS Scheduling must be done between the queues Fixed priority scheduling; (i.e., serve all from foreground then from background). Possibility of starvation. Time slice each queue gets a certain amount of CPU time which it can schedule amongst its processes; i.e., 80% to foreground in RR 20% to background in FCFS

23 Multilevel Queue Scheduling

24 Multilevel Feedback Queue A process can move between the various queues; aging can be implemented this way Multilevel-feedback-queue scheduler defined by the following parameters: number of queues scheduling algorithms for each queue method used to determine when to upgrade a process method used to determine when to demote a process method used to determine which queue a process will enter when that process needs service

25 Example of Multilevel Feedback Queue Three queues: Q 0 RR with time quantum 8 milliseconds Q 1 RR time quantum 16 milliseconds Q 2 FCFS Scheduling A new job enters queue Q 0 which is served FCFS. When it gains CPU, job receives 8 milliseconds. If it does not finish in 8 milliseconds, job is moved to queue Q 1. At Q 1 job is again served FCFS and receives 16 additional milliseconds. If it still does not complete, it is preempted and moved to queue Q 2.

26 Multilevel Feedback Queues

27 Real-Time Scheduling Hard real-time systems required to complete a critical task within a guaranteed amount of time Soft real-time computing requires that critical processes receive priority over less fortunate ones

28 Thread Scheduling Local Scheduling How the threads library decides which thread to put onto an available LWP Global Scheduling How the kernel decides which kernel thread to run next

29 Pthread Scheduling API #include <pthread.h> #include <stdio.h> #define NUM_THREADS 5 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int i; pthread_t tid[num_threads]; pthread_attr t attr; /* get the default attributes */ pthread_attr_init(&attr); /* set the scheduling algorithm to PROCESS or SYSTEM */ pthread_attr setscope(&attr, PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM); /* set the scheduling policy - FIFO, RT, or OTHER */ pthread attr setschedpolicy(&attr, SCHED_OTHER); /* create the threads */ for (i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; i++) pthread create(&tid[i],&attr,runner,null);

30 Pthread Scheduling API /* now join on each thread */ for (i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; i++) pthread join(tid[i], NULL); } /* Each thread will begin control in this function */ void *runner(void *param) { printf("i am a thread\n"); pthread exit(0); }

31 Operating System Examples Unix scheduling

32 Unix Scheduling The canonical Unix scheduler uses a MLFQ 3-4 classes spanning ~170 priority levels Timesharing: first 60 priorities System: next 40 priorities Real-time: next 60 priorities Interrupt: next 10 (Solaris) Priority scheduling across queues, RR within a queue The process with the highest priority always runs Processes with the same priority are scheduled RR Processes dynamically change priority Increases over time if process blocks before end of quantum Decreases over time if process uses entire quantum

33 Motivation of Unix Scheduler The idea behind the Unix scheduler is to reward interactive processes over CPU hogs Interactive processes (shell, editor, etc.) typically run using short CPU bursts They do not finish quantum before waiting for more input Want to minimize response time Time from keystroke (putting process on ready queue) to executing keystroke handler (process running) Don t want editor to wait until CPU hog finishes quantum This policy delays execution of CPU-bound jobs But that s ok

34 Java Thread Scheduling JVM Uses a Preemptive, Priority-Based Scheduling Algorithm FIFO Queue is Used if There Are Multiple Threads With the Same Priority

35 Java Thread Scheduling (cont) JVM Schedules a Thread to Run When: 1. The Currently Running Thread Exits the Runnable State 2. A Higher Priority Thread Enters the Runnable State * Note the JVM Does Not Specify Whether Threads are Time-Sliced or Not

36 Time-Slicing Since the JVM Doesn t Ensure Time-Slicing, the yield() Method May Be Used: while (true) { // perform CPU-intensive task... Thread.yield(); } This Yields Control to Another Thread of Equal Priority

37 Thread Priorities Priority Thread.MIN_PRIORITY Thread Priority Thread.MAX_PRIORITY Priority Thread.NORM_PRIORITY Comment Minimum Maximum Thread Default Thread Priority Priorities May Be Set Using setpriority() method: setpriority(thread.norm_priority + 2);

38 In-class Exercise 1 Consider the following set of processes, with the length of the CPU-burst time given in milliseconds: Process Burst Time Priority P P2 1 1 P3 2 3 P4 1 4 P5 5 2 The processes are assumed to have arrived in the order P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, all at time 0. a. Draw four Gantt charts illustrating the execution of these processes using FCFS, SJF, a nonpreemptive priority (a smaller priority number implies a higher priority), and RR (quantum = 1) scheduling. b. What is the turnaround time of each process for each of the scheduling algorithms in part a? c. What is the waiting time of each process for each of the scheduling algorithms in part a? d. Which of the schedules in part a results in the minimal average waiting time (over all processes)?

39 In-class Exercise 2 Which of the following scheduling algorithms could result in starvation? a. First-come, first-served b. Shortest job first c. Round robin d. Priority

40 In-class Exercises Consider a system running ten I/O-bound tasks and one CPU-bound task. Assume that the I/O-bound tasks issue an I/O operation once for every millisecond of CPU computing and that each I/O operation takes 10 milliseconds to complete. Also assume that the context switching overhead is 0.1millisecond and that all processes are long-running tasks. What is the CPU utilization for a round-robin scheduler when: a. The time quantum is 1 millisecond b. The time quantum is 10 milliseconds

41 CPU Scheduling Simulator