CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE
|
|
|
- Madeleine Fowler
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1 Introduction 3 2 Scope 3 3 Abbreviations 4 4 Definitions Medical device Investigational medical device Adverse event Intensity Serious adverse event Adverse device effect Serious adverse device effect Anticipated serious adverse device effect Unanticipated serious adverse device effect Adverse event categorisation Causality 7 5 Responsibilities and reporting process R&I responsibilities Investigator responsibilities in the event of an 8 AE/ADE/SAE/USADE Recording adverse events Investigator review of laboratory reports For all events For non-serious events For serious events SADE Reporting Reporting to the Sponsor Reporting to the Regulatory Authority Reporting to the research ethics Committee 11 6 Follow on reporting Follow on action required from MHRA 12 investigation 6.2 Trust reportable incidents 12 Appendix 1- flow diagram Appendix 2 NUH Medical Device Reporting Form Serious Adverse Device Effects Appendix 3 NRES Safety Reporting Form Appendix 4 confirmation of receipt notification Appendix 5 Medical Device Serious Adverse Device Effect / (U) SADE Follow-up Form. Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 1 Effective date 12/09/12
3 1. INTRODUCTION 2. SCOPE In order to comply with Medical Devices Regulations 2002, ISO/FDIS 14155:2011 and Standards for Good Clinical Practice (GCP), it is important that all researchers are aware of the different definitions related to adverse events in research and how to record, report and review each of these specific occurrences. It is essential that all adverse events which occur during the course of a study are recorded and reported appropriately in order to ensure that patient safety is maintained. Adverse events are reportable from the time of study enrolment. For medical device trials the time of enrollment is defined as the time at which, following recruitment, a subject signs and dates the informed consent form. Adverse events relating to trials involving medical devices can be classified in to different categories (Further information on these categories is provided in section 4): Adverse events (AE) Adverse Device Effect (ADE) Serious Adverse Device Effect(SADE) Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Anticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (ASADE) Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) Investigator assessment of causality and expectedness is of particular importance. This SOP is applicable to all researchers undertaking projects that fall within Medical Devices Regulations 2002 that are sponsored by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust where the study involves Non-CE marked devices or CE marked devices that are being used outside the intended use(s) covered by the CE marking. The principles within this document must be followed, however, if applicable, and only with prior agreement with the sponsor the content may be modified to be study specific and meet the needs of individual studies. For the purpose of this guidance and based on the definitions in section 4, the following events are considered reportable events: Any SAE, Any Investigational Medical Device Deficiency that might have led to a SAE if; a) Suitable action had not been taken or, b) Intervention had not been made or, c) If circumstances had been less fortunate Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 2 Effective date 12/09/12
4 3. Abbreviations 4. Definitions Admin R&I Administrator AE Adverse Event ADE Adverse Device Effect ASADE Anticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect CI Chief Investigator CIB Clinical investigation Brochure CIP Clinical Investigation Plan NUH Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust MHRA Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency PI Principal Investigator QA Quality Assurance R&I Research and Innovation SAE Serious Adverse Event SADE Serious Adverse Device Effect TMF Trial Master File USADE Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect 4.1 Medical device A medical device is any instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, appliance, implant, software, material, or other similar or related article: a) Intended by the manufacturer to be used, alone or in combination, for human beings for one or more of the specific purpose(s) of: 1) Diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease, 2) Diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of, or compensation for, an injury, 3) Investigation, replacement, modification, or support of the anatomy or of a physiological process, 4) Supporting or sustaining life, 5) Control of conception, 6) Disinfection of medical devices, and b) Which does not achieve its primary intended action in or on the human body by pharmacological, immunological or metabolic means, but which may be assisted in its intended function by such means N.B: The term medical device is usually defined by national regulations. For the purposes of this International Standard, this definition does not list in vitro diagnostic medical devices (see ISO 13485:2003, definition 3.7[1]). 4.2 Investigational medical device An investigational medical device is a medical device being assessed for safety or performance in a clinical investigation. This includes medical devices already on the market that are being evaluated for new intended uses, new populations, new materials or design changes. Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 3 Effective date 12/09/12
5 4.3 Adverse Event (AE) An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury or any untoward clinical signs in a subject enrolled in a clinical trial, including occurrences which are not necessarily caused by or related to the medical device/intervention. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including abnormal lab results), symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of the medical device/intervention, whether or not considered to be related to the medical device/intervention. For medical device trials the time of enrolment is defined as the time at which, following recruitment, a subject signs and dates the informed consent form. 4.4 Intensity: The intensity of an adverse event will initially be assessed according to the following definitions: Intensity Description Mild An event easily tolerated by the patient, causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with everyday activities Moderate An event sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal everyday activities Severe An event that prevents normal everyday activities 4.5 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) An adverse event is defined by the ISO14155:2011 guidelines for medical device trials as serious if it: a). Results in death or b). Is a life-threatening illness or injury or c). Requires hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation or d). Results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity or e) Medical or surgical intervention required to prevent any of the above f). Leads to foetal distress, foetal death or consists of a congenital anomaly or birth defect or g). Is otherwise considered medically significant by the investigator. Life threatening in the definition of an SAE refers to an event in which the subject was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event that hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe. Medical judgement should be exercised in deciding whether an SAE is serious in other situations. Important: AE s that are not immediately life-threatening or do not result in death or hospitalisation but may jeopardise the subject or may require intervention to prevent one or the other outcomes listed, should be considered serious A planned hospitalization for a pre-existing condition, or a procedure required by the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP), without a serious deterioration in health, is not considered to be a serious adverse event. Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 4 Effective date 12/09/12
6 4.6 Adverse Device Effect (ADE) An ADE is an adverse event related to the use of an investigational medical device. This includes any adverse event resulting from insufficiencies or inadequacies in the instructions for use, the deployment, the implantation, the installation, the operation, or any malfunction of the investigational medical device. An ADE includes any event that is a result of use error or intentional misuse. Use error refers to an act or omission of an act that results in a different device response than intended by the manufacturer or expected by the user. An unexpected physiological response of the subject does not in itself constitute a use error. 4.7 Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) A SADE is an adverse device effect that has resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of a serious adverse event (refer to section 4.5). This includes device deficiencies that might have led to a serious adverse event if: Suitable action had not been taken or Intervention had not been made or If circumstances had been less fortunate 4.8 Anticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (ASADE) A serious adverse device effect which by its nature, incidence, severity or outcome has been previously identified in the risk analysis report or Clinical Investigation Brochure. 4.9 Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) Serious adverse device effect which by its nature, incidence, severity or outcome has not been identified in the current version of the risk analysis report or Clinical Investigation Brochure Adverse event categorisation Adverse events Nonserious Serious Non-device related Adverse Event (AE) Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Device or procedure related Adverse Device Effect (ADE) Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) Anticipated Unanticipated Anticipated Serious Device Effect (ASADE) Unanticipated Serious Device Effect (USADE) Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 5 Effective date 12/09/12
7 4.11 Causality The relationship between the investigational medical device and the occurrence of each adverse event will be assessed and categorised. The investigator will use clinical judgement to determine the relationship. Alternative causes, such as natural history of the underlying diseases, concomitant therapy, other risk factors etc. will be considered. The Investigator will also consult the current version of the risk analysis report and/or investigator brochure where available. Causality assessments; Relationship Description Not related: No relationship with investigational device. Other factor(s) certainly or probably causative. Related: Temporal relationship of the onset of the event, relative to use of the device, is reasonable and there is no other cause to explain the event. 5. Responsibilities and Reporting Process There are a number of responsibilities when managing adverse events. Below is a list of responsibilities for the Investigator and R&I. The responsibilities described follow the life cycle of a study. Please refer to flow diagram (appendix 1). 5.1 R&I responsibilities: As soon as a trial for which R&I is acting on behalf of NUH as Sponsor; receives Notification of Acceptance from the MHRA, the R&I Administrator (or delegated individual) will ensure that the trial is appropriately registered on DOCUMAS. The trial should be flagged on DOCUMAS as pending until Final NHS permission to commence recruitment is granted. Upon issuing the final NHS Permission, the trial status should be changed to active Prior to commencing study recruitment investigators and study personnel will receive training relating to their responsibilities for adverse event reporting for NUH sponsored studies as part of the site initiation visit conducted by R&I. For further information please refer to NUH SOP 45 -Site initiation, available on the R&I website The R&I fax machine and the [email protected] box will be checked twice daily for any reports received by one of the R&I administration team(admin) according to a rota set up with agreement of all individuals involved, allowing for absence and leave cover. Upon checking both routes of contact, a rota form will be signed/dated and the time documented. Admin staff will also ensure the fax machine is maintained.. Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 6 Effective date 12/09/12
8 5.2 Investigator responsibilities in the event of an AE/ADE/SAE/ (U)SADE: Recording Adverse Events For the avoidance of doubt, ALL AE/SAEs should be collected for all trial subjects from the time of their enrolment into the study. For medical device trials the time of enrolment is defined as the time at which, following recruitment, a subject signs and dates the informed consent form. The Investigator must ensure that the dignity, rights, safety and well being of subjects are given priority at all times and must take appropriate action to ensure the safety of all staff and patients in the study. The Investigator will consider what actions, if any, are required and in what timeframe. In the event of an adverse event, the investigator (or delegated member of the research team) must review all documentation (e.g., hospital notes, laboratory and diagnostic reports) relevant to the event. The event and relevant comments must then be recorded in the subject s medical notes (or source data where this is not the medical notes). Except where the protocol states otherwise, all adverse events should be recorded in detail on a case record form or equivalent to allow analysis at a later stage Investigator review of laboratory reports: The Investigator will review all laboratory reports and comment on any clinically important out of range values. All clinically important abnormal laboratory tests occurring during the trial will be repeated at appropriate intervals until they either return to baseline or to a level deemed acceptable by the Investigator and the Sponsor (or its designated representative), or until a diagnosis that explains them is made. *Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities should be reported as adverse events.* Out of range values that are not clinically significant should be marked NCS on the laboratory report and the report should be signed and dated by the investigator or delegated individual For all events: When an AE/ADE occurs in a trial sponsored by NUH the PI, or delegated individual, makes an assessment as to whether it is defined as serious, using the definitions in section 4.0 and in consultation with both the Clinical Investigational Plan (CIP) and Clinical Investigation Brochure (CIB) where available For non-serious events: If the event is defined as not serious, it should be recorded in the medical records, or source data, where this is not the medical records ie CRF. Minimal information recorded should include; Concomitant medication Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 7 Effective date 12/09/12
9 Causal relationship to device as per definitions in section 4.4 Intensity as per definitions in section For serious events: If the event is defined as serious - a SAE or device deficiency that could have led to (U)SADE: If a serious event occurs the Investigator must quarantine the device as soon as possible Until the MHRA has been given the opportunity to carry out an investigation, the device should not be: discarded repaired returned to the manufacturer All material evidence, i.e. devices/parts removed, replaced or withdrawn from use following an incident, instructions for use, records of use, repair and maintenance records, packaging materials, or other means of batch identification must be: clearly identified and labelled stored securely. Evidence should not be interfered with in any way except for safety reasons or to prevent its loss. Where appropriate, a record should be made of all readings, settings and positions of switches, valves, dials, gauges and indicators, together with any photographic evidence and eyewitness reports. N.B: Consideration should be given to the practicality and implications of quarantining the device; for example if the device is an implantable device all further local supplies of the device should be quarantined as a precaution until further advice is sought SADE Reporting: Investigator responsibilities: For ALL serious adverse events related to an investigational medical device the investigator is responsible for notifying: the Sponsor (NUH) and the Research Ethics Committee (REC) Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 8 Effective date 12/09/12
10 5.2.7 Reporting to the sponsor: If the event is classified as an SADE the NUH medical device reporting form for serious adverse device effects.(appendix 2) should be used and is available on the Research and Innovation web site: The completed form must be sent to R&I within 24hrs of any member of the research team becoming aware of the event either by: to: or Fax to: The Chief Investigator must be copied in on the notification. NB: If the PI is unavailable to sign the SADE form the study team should not delay in sending the SADE report to R&I. A copy of the original submitted form signed by the PI must be forwarded to R&I as soon as possible. Investigator & R&I responsibility: R&I will acknowledge receipt of the SADE notification by noon of the following working day; either to the fax machine or address, from which the initial notification was received (appendix 4). If acknowledgement of the SADE is not received by the person sending the notification within 24 hours, then it is the responsibility of the Investigator (or delegated member of the research team) to contact R&I immediately Reporting to the regulatory authority: R&I responsibilities: Incidents should be reported to the regulatory authority as soon as possible, via the MHRA online reporting system accessed from the reporting adverse incidents involving medical devices section of the MHRA website available from: FAB1A E6150?edit NUH R&I will inform the device manufacturer of the event. The device should not be returned to the manufacturer until the MHRA have completed their investigation. NUH R&I will inform the medical device liaison officer at NUH, this is the Head of Clinical Engineering. If the study is multicentre NUH R&I will inform all Principal Investigators involved in the study about the event. Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 9 Effective date 12/09/12
11 5.2.9 Reporting to the research ethics committee: Investigator responsibilities: If the event is classified as an SAE the investigator must report to the research ethics committee (REC) using the NRES safety reporting form for all studies except clinical trials of investigational products (Appendix 3). Available from: A copy of the completed REC form should be sent to R&I either by: to: [email protected] or Fax to: R&I responsibilities NUH R&I on behalf of the sponsor will confirm receipt of the event report to the study team (appendix 4),, to either the account or fax from which the report was received- R&I will review the information provided and record the information on DOCUMAS. If this confirmation of receipt from R&I is not received to either the account or fax to which the original report was sent, then the Investigator should contact the R&I office to confirm the receipt of the report. 6.0 Follow on Reporting Investigator: After the initial report the investigator is required to actively follow up the subject until either: a) The SAE/USADE resolves, or b) Until 30 days after the discontinuation of use of the medical device. This decision must be documented in the TMF (for NUH sponsored studies) & Site file. Investigators (or delegated persons) will provide follow-up information, each time new information is available. Where NUH is Sponsor the NUH R&I Research Related SAE/USADE Followon Report Form (appendix 5) available on the R&I website will be completed and should be submitted ensuring the report includes the unique reference report allocated by R&I to either the: R&I fax (Fax: ). or to [email protected] R&I: The QA manager, or delegated individual, will liaise with the investigator to gain an update regarding the progress of the SADE/USADE every two weeks until either:. a) The SADE/USADE resolves, or b) Until 30 days after the discontinuation of use of the medical device. Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 10 Effective date 12/09/12
12 6.1 Follow on action required from the MHRA investigation. The investigator and NUH R&I will undertake any requirements outlined in the MHRA investigation and follow up as instructed. 6.2 Trust Reportable Incidents In the same way that adverse incidents, including clinical, non-clinical and near misses can involve patients, staff and visitors during routine care, adverse incidents can also occur during research related activities. An adverse incident can be defined as "an event or circumstance that could have or did lead to unintended or unexpected harm, loss or damage" It is important that research related adverse incidents are treated in the same way as non-research related adverse incidents. Research related adverse incidents must therefore be reported in accordance with the Trusts own Adverse Incident Reporting Procedures. An example of a research related adverse incident may be lost drugs. This is not an AE but should be reported as an AI. t_an_incident.aspx Events that are both Adverse Incidents and Adverse Events MUST be reported independently following both processes/procedures. SOP REVIEW PERIOD This procedure will be reviewed by the owner on a biennial basis, unless new local, national and/or international recommendations force an earlier review Appendix 1 Flow Diagram Appendix 2 NUH Medical Device Reporting Form.Serious Adverse Device Effects Appendix 3 NRES reporting form Appendix 4 NUH Standard of receipt of report Appendix 5 NUH Medical Device Serious Adverse Device Effects/ (U)SADE Follow-up Form Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 11 Effective date 12/09/12
13 Appendix 1 AE or ADE (if causal relationship to device identified) occurs Appendix 1 Investigator Responsibilities Sponsor responsibilities Is AE/ADE serious? No Log AE in medical records, or source data where this is not the medical records ie CRF Record con meds. Investigator to assess; a) Causal relationship b) Severity. SAE or device deficiency that could have led to (U)SADE Yes If SAE; e- mail rdsae@nuh. nhs.uk or fax If (U)SADE; Report immediately to REC within 24 hours of becoming aware of the event; safety reporting form (non-ctimp) hs.uk/applications/after -ethicalreview/safetyreports/sa fety-reports-for-allother-research/ & copy in [email protected] or fax QUARANTINE DEVICE Has receipt of SAE/SADE confirmed by R&I? NUH Sponsored studies only Inform manufacturer Inform medical device liaison = Head of Clinical Engineering Report to MHRA If SADE or USADE SAE/SADE received- receipt acknowledged to study team Log SAE/SADE on DOCUMAS and in TMF. If multicentre, inform all PIs No Contact R&I immediately Yes Follow up until resolution or until 30 days after discontinuation of use of medical device Await outcome of MHRA Receive, file and log follow up reports until SAE/SADE resolved or until 30 days after discontinuation of use of medical device In addition the Investigator will review all laboratory reports and comment on any clinically important out of range values. All clinically important abnormal laboratory tests occurring during the trial will be repeated at appropriate intervals until they either return to baseline or to a level deemed acceptable by the Investigator and the Sponsor (or its designated representative), or until a diagnosis that explains them is made. *Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities should be reported as adverse events* Out of range values that are not clinically significant should be marked NCS on the laboratory report. The investigator must sign and date all laboratory reports. Generate reports of SAE/SADEs for as required. Reporting of Adverse Events for NUH sponsored Medical Device Trials Page 12 Effective date 12/09/12
14 1. Project Identifiers: Site Number: Investigator s name: Project Title: 2. Site details: Reported By: Print name: Contact details: Tel: Subject Identifiers: Initials: Participant ID: Date of Birth: Sex: Male Female 4. Event/Effect Information: Date of Onset: Event / Effect: Description of Event/Effect: Further information e.g. Lab Tests/Results, Signs & Symptoms related to Diagnosis 5. Action Taken Regarding Study Device: None Removed/ Discontinued Other (specify) Detail treatment given: 6. Serious Criteria (tick all that apply) Death Life threatening illness or injury Hospitalisation or prolonged of hospitalisation Permanent impairment of body structure or body function Medical or surgical intervention required to prevent any of the above Led to foetal distress, foetal death or congenital anomaly or birth defect Other (maybe protocol specific) - Specify: 7. Causality: Detail all possible and suspected causes:
15 8. Relationship of the Event/Effect to the Device? Related Not Related 9. Event/Effect anticipated? Anticipated Unanticipated 10. Classification of SAE/SADE: Device Related Anticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect - (ASADE) Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect - (USADE) Not related to device Serious Adverse Event (SAE) 11. Investigational Medical Device Information Detail all devices: Device Start date of device utilisation End Date of device utilisation 12. Event Outcome: 1) Recovered: Yes: No: If yes, date of recovery: 3) Ongoing: Yes: No: If yes, details: 4) Recovered with sequelae: Yes: No: If yes, date: Details: 5) Subject Died: Yes: No: If yes, date of death: 13. Principal Investigator Investigator Signature: Date: / / REPORTING INSTRUCTIONS
16 Send Copy to R&D within 24hrs from becoming aware of the event by either: 1. Hand-deliver a copy of this form to: Research & Innovations Nottingham Integrated Clinical Research Centre, C floor, South Block, Queens Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH or 2. a copy to [email protected], or 3. Fax a copy to: and phone Research & Innovations Dept on or ext or to confirm arrival. Any queries please contact a member of staff in the Research & Innovations department: Telephone: or ext or Retain this form in the Trial Master File For Internal Use Medical Monitor/Chief Investigator Medical Monitor or CI: Confirm Classification: Yes No if no state reason and re-classify: Signature: Date: / /
17 REPORT OF SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT (SAE) (For all studies except clinical trials of investigational medicinal products) The Chief Investigator should report any SAE that is both related to the research procedures and is unexpected. Send the report to the Research Ethics Committee that gave a favourable opinion of the research within 15 days of the CI becoming aware of the event. 1. Details of Chief Investigator Name: Address: Telephone: Fax: 2. Details of study Full title of study: Name of main REC: Main REC reference number: Research sponsor: Sponsor s reference for this report: (if applicable) 3. Type of event Please categorise this event, ticking all appropriate options: Death Life threatening Hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalization
18 Persistent or significant disability or incapacity Congenital anomaly or birth defect Other 4. Circumstances of event Date of SAE: Location: Describe the circumstances of the event: (Attach copy of detailed report if necessary) What is your assessment of the implications, if any, for the safety of study participants and how will these be addressed? 5. Declaration Signature of Chief Investigator: Print name: Date of submission: 6. Acknowledgement of receipt by main REC (please insert name): The [ ] Research Ethics Committee acknowledges receipt of the above. Signed: Name: Position on REC:
19 Date: Signed original to be sent back to Chief Investigator (or other person submitting report) Copy to be kept for information by main REC.
20 NUH R&I sponsor ref: udy Title: incipal Investigator: onsor: Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust This confirms receipt of the above SAE/(U)SADE by this R&I office acting on behalf of NUH as project sponsor. The event has been allocated the reference number of XXXX, please quote this reference on communications relating to this event and on all follow on reports. Kind regards, Research and Innovation NICRC C-Floor Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Queens Medical Centre Campus Nottingham NG7 2UH Direct Dial: ext Fax: For further information about R&D and a comprehensive list of SOPs and processes please visit our new website: the url to Please consider the environment before printing this
21 FAX NOTICE Queens Medical Centre Campus Dear xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, NUH R&I sponsor ref: Study Title: Principal Investigator: Research and Innovation Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust NINRC-C Floor Derby Road Nottingham NG7 2UH Tel: Fax: Sponsor: Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust This fax letter confirms receipt of the above SAE/(U)SADE by this R&I office acting on behalf of NUH as project sponsor. The event has been allocated the reference number of XXXX, please quote this reference on communications relating to this event and on all follow on reports. Kind regards, Queens Medical Centre Campus Nottingham NG7 2UH Direct Dial: ext Fax: For further information about R&D and a comprehensive list of SOPs and processes please visit our new website: the url to
22 1. Project Identifiers: Site Number: Investigator s name: Project Title: 2. Site details: Reported By: Print name: Contact details: Tel: 3. Subject Identifiers: Initials: Participant ID: Date of Birth: Sex: Male Female 4. Additional details of SAE/(U)SADE since initial report: Signs & Symptoms related to Diagnosis, Lab or other test results, relevant to assessment of case: 5. Additional Action taken since initial report: None Removed/ Discontinued Device Other (specify) Detail further action/treatment given:
23 6. Outcome: 1) Recovered: Yes: No: If yes, date of recovery: 3) Ongoing: Yes: No: If yes, details: 4) Recovered with sequelae: Yes: No: If yes, date: Details: 5) Subject Died: Yes: No: If yes, date of death: Give cause and PM details if available: Did the patient continue on the study as per protocol? Yes: No: Was the patient withdrawn from the study? Yes: No: 7. Concomitant Medication: Concomitant Medication Dose Route Start date of administration End Date of Administration 8. Principal Investigator: Name of Principal Investigator at reporting site: Signature: Date: / / Send Copy to R&I by either: 1. a copy to: [email protected]
24 or 2. Fax a copy to: and phone Research & Innovations Dept on or ext or to confirm arrival. Any queries please contact a member of staff in the Research & Innovations department: Telephone: or ext or A copy should also be sent to the Chief Investigator & Retain form in the Investigator Site File For Internal Use Medical Monitor/Chief Investigator Chief Investigator: Comments: Signature: Date: / /
GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Consumer, Environmental and Health Technologies Health technology and Cosmetics MEDDEV 2.7/3 revision 3 May 2015 GUIDELINES ON
GENERAL INFORMATION. Adverse Event (AE) Definition (ICH GUIDELINES E6 FOR GCP 1.2):
Make copies of the blank SAE report form as needed. Retain originals with confirmation of all information faxed to DMID Pharmacovigilance Group Clinical Research Operations and Management Support (CROMS
ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014
ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014 1. Introduction The St. Michael s Hospital (SMH) REB
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for: Reporting of Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol sponsored CTIMP s. Lisa Austin, Research Manager
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for: Reporting of Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol sponsored CTIMP s Author: Lisa Austin, Research Manager Purpose and Objective: To identify and standardise
Guidance Notes for Applicants of the Certificate for Clinical Trial on Medical Device
Guidance Notes for Applicants of the Certificate for Clinical Trial on Medical Device List of Contents Page 1. Introduction 1.1 The Medical Device Administrative Control System and the 3 proposed legislation
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. 2. Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or Study Protocol
Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS FT Research & Development APPROVED STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH 2. Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or Study Protocol
PHARMACY AND POISONS ORDINANCE (Cap. 138) APPLICATION FOR A CLINICAL TRIAL/MEDICINAL TEST CERTIFICATE
PHARMACY AND POISONS ORDINANCE (Cap. 138) APPLICATION FOR A CLINICAL TRIAL/MEDICINAL TEST CERTIFICATE PART A: TRIAL INFORMATION A1. Title of Clinical Trial (as stated in proposed Protocol) Protocol No.
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT- DO NOT COPY STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. STH Investigator
Research Department STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE STH Investigator Archiving of Essential Documentation Generated During Clinical Research SOP Number A127 Version Number V1.3 Effective Date Author Zoe Whiteley
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Reporting Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board Reporting Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others Introduction This policy details the Institutional Review Board
Vigilance Reporting. Vicky Medley - Head of QMS, Medical Devices. September 2015. Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved.
Vigilance Reporting Vicky Medley - Head of QMS, Medical Devices September 2015 2 Why? 3 protecting and improving public health https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/medicines-and-healthcareproducts-regulatory-agency/about
ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND DELEGATION OF DUTIES IN CLINICAL TRIALS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS
ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND DELEGATION OF DUTIES IN CLINICAL TRIALS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO SOP 09 DATE RATIFIED 4/7/13 NEXT REVIEW DATE 4/7/14 POLICY STATEMENT/KEY OBJECTIVES:
A New Standard for Medical Device Adverse Event Classification
Vol. 5, No. 12, December 2009 Can You Handle the Truth? A New Standard for Medical Device Adverse Event Classification By Nancy J. Stark Adverse events are defined and managed differently in the device
Adverse Events in Clinical Trials: Definitions and Documentation
Clinical and Translational Science Institute / CTSI at the University of California, San Francisco Welcome to Online Training for Clinical Research Coordinators Adverse Events in Clinical Trials: Definitions
INTERIM SITE MONITORING PROCEDURE
INTERIM SITE MONITORING PROCEDURE 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this SOP is to describe the interim monitoring procedures conducted at Institution, according to GCP and other applicable local regulations.
Laurie Shaker-Irwin, Ph.D., M.S. Co-Leader, Regulatory Knowledge and Research Ethics UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Laurie Shaker-Irwin, Ph.D., M.S. Co-Leader, Regulatory Knowledge and Research Ethics UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute Understand the protocol completely Recognize institutional polices
Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)
1 2 20 February 2012 EMA/876333/2011 3 4 Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP) Annex I - Definitions Draft finalised by the Agency in collaboration with Member States 7 February 2012 Definitions
Marie-Claire Rickard, GCP & Governance Manager Rachel Fay, GCP & Governance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Operations Manager
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for: Monitoring SOP 28 Version 7.0 Number: Number: Effective Date: 29 th November 2015 Review Date: 6 th January 2017 Author: Reviewer: Reviewer: Authorisation: Name
Managing Risk in Clinical Research. Dr Martha J Wrigley R&D Manager Senior Visiting Fellow University of Surrey
Managing Risk in Clinical Research Dr Martha J Wrigley R&D Manager Senior Visiting Fellow University of Surrey Aim of the session To explore the risks associated with clinical research and understand how
Quality Monitoring Checklist
Quality Monitoring Checklist Instructions: For each task below, the Quality Monitor indicates in the appropriate column if the Monitor accomplished the task by using the following codes Yes No N/A = Monitor
Archiving of Research Documentation
Suspension, Termination & Completion Standard Operating Procedure VERSION / REVISION: 2.0 EFFECTIVE DATE: 28 05 12 REVIEW DATE: 28 05 14 AUTHOR(S): CONTROLLER: APPROVED BY: Clinical Trials Manager; Recruitment
This SOP may also be used by staff from other NHS areas, or organisations, with prior agreement.
Standard Operating Procedure: SOP Number: SOP-QA-32 Version No: 1 Author: Date: (Gary Cooper, Named Sponsor Archivist, NHS Grampian and University of Aberdeen) 1-9-15 Approved by: Date: 1-9-15 (Professor
Essential Documentation and the Creation and Maintenance of Trial Master Files
This is a controlled document. The master document is posted on the JRCO website and any print-off of this document will be classed as uncontrolled. Researchers and their teams may print off this document
Standard Operating Procedure for the Recording, Management and Reporting of Adverse Events by Investigators
ASR\INV_S05_SOP for AE_SAE_Reporting by Inv_V06.doc Page 1 of 19 Standard Operating Procedure for the Recording, Management and Reporting of Adverse Events by Investigators SOP Number: Effective Date:
Standard Operating Procedure on Training Requirements for staff participating in CTIMPs Sponsored by UCL
Page 1 of 10 Standard Operating Procedure on Training Requirements for staff participating in CTIMPs Sponsored by UCL SOP ID Number: Effective Date:01/08/2012 Version Number & Date of Authorisation: V02,
Data Management in Clinical Trials
Data Management in Clinical Trials Introduction to the Principles and Practice of Clinical Research February 19, 2013 Diane St. Germain, RN, MS Nurse Consultant Division of Cancer Prevention National Cancer
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. Management of Essential Documents and Trial Folders
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH Management of Essential Documents and Trial Folders Author Linda Ward Author s Job Title QA Coordinator Division Department Version number 2 Ref SOP/CLN/001/2
Subject: No. Page PROTOCOL AND CASE REPORT FORM DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW Standard Operating Procedure
703 1 of 11 POLICY The Beaumont Research Coordinating Center (BRCC) will provide advice to clinical trial investigators on protocol development, content and format. Upon request, the BRCC will review a
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,
L 121/34 DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to
Document Title: Project Management of Papworth Sponsored Studies
Document Title: Project Management of Papworth Sponsored Studies Document Number: SOP009 Staff involved in development: Job titles only Document author/owner: Directorate: Department: For use by: RM&G
This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2001L0020 EN 07.08.2009 002.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
TRIAL MASTER FILE- SPONSORED
gsop-06-04 - Management of TMF for ENHT/ WHHT Sponsored CTIMPs Page 1 of 16 Hertfordshire Hospitals R&D Consortium Incorporating West Herts Hospitals NHS Trust and East & North Herts NHS Trust TRIAL MASTER
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office Title of SOP: Undertaking Risk Assessment of a Research and Development Project SOP Number: 33 Version Number: 1.0 Supercedes: N/A Effective
The Study Site Master File and Essential Documents
The Study Site Master File and Essential Documents Standard Operating Procedure Office of Health and Medical Research Queensland Health SOP reference: 002 Version number: 1 Effective date: 01 June 2010
Medical Software Development. International standards requirements and practice
Medical Software Development International standards requirements and practice Food and Drug Administration What? A public health agency Why? Protect American consumers How? By enforcing the Federal Food,
Page 191 TITLE 21 FOOD AND DRUGS 355 1
Page 191 TITLE 21 FOOD AND DRUGS 355 1 APPEALS TAKEN PRIOR TO OCTOBER 10, 1962 Section 104(d)(3) of Pub. L. 87 781 made amendments to subsec. (h) of this section inapplicable to any appeal taken prior
Topics for today. Issues: Regulatory Obligations Post-marketing Adverse Event Reporting; MDRs and Safety Reports. Post-marketing Submissions
Issues: Regulatory Obligations Post-marketing Adverse Event Reporting; MDRs and Safety Reports Martha A. Feldman, RAC Drug & Device Development Co., Inc. Topics for today Post-approval requirements for
Document Title: Trust Approval and Research Governance
Document Title: Trust Approval and Research Governance Document Number: SOP034 Staff involved in development: Job titles only Document author/owner: Directorate: Department: For use by: RM&G Manager, R&D
SOP Number: SOP-QA-20 Version No: 1. Author: Date: 1-9-15 (Patricia Burns, Research Governance Manager, University of Aberdeen)
Standard Operating Procedure: SOP Number: SOP-QA-20 Version No: 1 Author: Date: 1-9-15 (Patricia Burns, Research Governance Manager, University of Aberdeen) Approved by: Date: 1-9-15 (Professor Julie Brittenden,
Dorset Research Consortium. Research Governance: A handbook for Researchers in Dorset
Dorset Research Consortium Research Governance: A handbook for Researchers in Dorset DRC Version 1 dated 25 th July 2012 Research Governance: The Basics... 4 What is Research Governance?... 4 The Research
Trial Delivery SOP 05 Trial Archiving
Gloucestershire Research and Development Consortium Standard Operating Procedure R&D SOP TD 05Trial Archiving Trial Delivery SOP 05 Trial Archiving IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ALL USERS OF THIS SOP TO
ICH Topic E 2 A Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting. Step 5
European Medicines Agency June 1995 CPMP/ICH/377/95 ICH Topic E 2 A Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting Step 5 NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON CLINICAL SAFETY DATA MANAGEMENT:
The Monitoring Visit. Denise Owensby, CCRP Sr. Clinical Research Coordinator Clinical & Translational Science Center University of California, Davis
The Monitoring Visit Denise Owensby, CCRP Sr. Clinical Research Coordinator Clinical & Translational Science Center University of California, Davis Disclosure The information herein is not intended to
Study Start-Up SS-204.01. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Site Initiation Visit (SIV)
Study Start-Up SS-204.01 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Site Initiation Visit (SIV) Approval: Nancy Paris, MS, FACHE President and CEO 08 March 2012 (Signature and Date) Approval: Frederick M. Schnell,
Vertex Investigator-Initiated Studies Program Overview
Vertex Investigator-Initiated Studies Program Overview Our Goal To support independent, investigator-initiated research designed to advance scientific knowledge of disease states, patient populations,
Tracy Walker, RN, BSN, CCRP Research Nurse OHSU Knight Cancer Institute. 503-346-1183 [email protected]
Tracy Walker, RN, BSN, CCRP Research Nurse OHSU Knight Cancer Institute 503-346-1183 [email protected] Exercise Questions to Keep in Mind Is there an adverse event? What is the severity? What is the relationship
TEMPLATE DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN
TEMPLATE DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN ICRIN (QM sub group) Version: XX Date: XXXXXXX Page 1 of 6 1.0 Document Ownership The Data Management Plan (DMP) will be initiated and subsequently owned by the Data Manager
Clinical Trials - Insurance and Indemnity
Policy Directive Clinical Trials - Insurance and Indemnity Document Number PD2011_006 Publication date 25-Jan-2011 Functional Sub group Corporate Administration - Governance Clinical/ Patient Services
Guidance notes. for Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance in Patient Support Programmes
Guidance notes for Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance in Patient Support Programmes 9 May 2011 Approval Status Authors The ABPI Pharmacovigilance Expert Network Change History N/A Approval Date 9 May
GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE: CONSOLIDATED GUIDELINE
ICH E6 GCP: Consolidated Guideline: Investigator 1/7 Institutional Review Board Services ICH HARMONIZED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE E6: GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE: CONSOLIDATED GUIDELINE 4. INVESTIGATOR 4.1 Investigator's
POST-APPROVAL SAFETY DATA MANAGEMENT: DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS FOR EXPEDITED REPORTING E2D
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE POST-APPROVAL SAFETY DATA MANAGEMENT: DEFINITIONS
Guidance on Reviewing and Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Guidance on Reviewing and Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events
Act of 26 February 1998, containing rules on medical research involving human subjects (Medical Research (Human Subjects) Act)
[This is an unofficial translation and is provided for reference purposes only. It is not certified and it has not been authorised by the Dutch government; persons using this translation do so entirely
Health Products and Food Branch. www.hc-sc.gc.ca
Health Products and Food Branch 1 HEALTH CANADA PART C DIVISION 5 - DRUGS FOR CLINICAL TRIALS INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS Part C - Division 5 2 Part A: Part B: Part C: Part D: Part E: Part G: Part J: Administration
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Risk Assessment of STH sponsored CTIMPs
Research Department STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE of STH sponsored CTIMPs SOP History None SOP Number C118 Created STH Research Department (EW) Reviewed STH Research Department (EW) Superseded Version 1.0,
GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Consumer, Environmental and Health Technologies Health technology and Cosmetics MEDDEV 2.7/2 revision 2 September 2015 GUIDELINES
Web Meeting 12./13.12.2013: Study Close-out Procedures
SiLVER Study A prospective, randomized, open-labeled trial comparing sirolimuscontaining versus mtor-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
Serious Breaches. Ian Gravenor. Senior Clinical Project Manager Novo Nordisk Ltd
Serious Breaches Ian Gravenor Senior Clinical Project Manager Novo Nordisk Ltd Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol Agenda Why report? The legislation MHRA Guidance document Timelines Actions
JRO RMG RSS SOP 12. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Study Closedown and Archiving Royal Free site specific SOP
Office Location: 1 st Floor Maple House 149 Tottenham Court Road London W1T 7DN Joint Research Office Tel No. 0845 1555 000 Web-sites: www.uclh.nhs.uk; www.ucl.ac.uk/jro Postal Address: UCL, Gower Street
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT. Uncontrolled Copy. RDS014 Research Related Archiving. University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust CONTROLLED DOCUMENT RDS014 Research Related Archiving CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION: PURPOSE Controlled Document Number: Version Number: 1 Controlled Document
Medicine Safety Glossary
The following definitions are provided as a resource to supplement the information provided in the Medicine Safety Education section of the Pfizer.com Web site; they are not intended as a comprehensive
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT GAINING NHS RESEARCH PERMISSION FROM CARDIFF AND VALE UHB - GUIDANCE FOR RESEARCHERS. Research Governance Group
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT GAINING NHS RESEARCH PERMISSION FROM CARDIFF AND VALE UHB - GUIDANCE FOR RESEARCHERS Reference No: UHB 074 Version No: 5 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No: N/A Documents to read alongside
CDISC Data Standards Can Facilitate Composition of Adverse Event Narratives
CDISC Data Standards Can Facilitate Composition of Adverse Event Narratives Anisa Scott, Ph.D. and Richard C. Zink, Ph.D. JMP Life Sciences SAS Institute, Inc. [email protected] Copyright 2010 SAS Institute
CONDUCTING GLOBAL CLINICAL RESEARCH TRIALS:
CONDUCTING GLOBAL CLINICAL RESEARCH TRIALS: COMPARING AND CONTRASTING FDA MEDICAL DEVICE REGULATIONS FOR CLINICAL INVESTIGATORS WITH ISO 14155:2011 Introduction Today s clinical research landscape for
A Guide to Pharmacy Documentation For Clinical Trials
A Guide to Pharmacy Documentation For Clinical Trials Roy Sinclair Clinical Trials Pharmacist St. George s Hospital (to Sep 2007) Lecturer Kingston University January 2008 A Guide to Pharmacy Documentation
Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving Essential Documentation relating to Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products (CTIMPs)
archiving\spon_s21_sop_for_archiving V02.doc Page 1 of 13 Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving Essential Documentation relating to Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products (CTIMPs) SOP
Guidance for Handling Defective Medicinal Products
QUALITY CONTROL WEST MIDLANDS Guidance for Handling Defective Medicinal Products Version 1 March 2006 Wayne Goddard - Laboratory Manager Mitch Phillips - Lead QA Pharmacist, West Midlands SHAs A Guide
SOP Number: SOP-QA-34 Version No: 1. Version Description of Changes Date Effective. Change of number for Q-Pulse (Replaces UoA-NHSG-SOP-051 V1)
Standard Operating Procedure: SOP Number: SOP-QA-34 Version No: 1 Author: Date: 1-9-15 (Carole Edwards, Lead Research Nurse, NHS Grampian) Approved by: Date: 1-9-15 (Professor Julie Brittenden, R&D Director,
DESCRIPTION OF THE MEDICINES FOR HUMAN USE (CLINICAL TRIALS) REGULATIONS 2004
DESCRIPTION OF THE MEDICINES FOR HUMAN USE (CLINICAL TRIALS) REGULATIONS 2004 Page 1 of 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 PUBLIC HEALTH BENEFITS 5 Good clinical practice 5 Good manufacturing
Health Canada s GCP Compliance Program Part 2. GCP Information Sessions November 2010
Your Health and Safety... Our priority Votre santé et votre Securité notre priorité Health Canada s GCP Compliance Program Part 2 GCP Information Sessions November 2010 Inspection Program Main objectives
Guidance on the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directive 98/79/EC
Guidance on the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directive 98/79/EC August 2013 Contents 1 Introduction...3 2 Scope of the directive...3 2.1 What is an in vitro diagnostic medical device?... 3 2.2 Specimen
Guidance on legislation. Clinical investigations of medical devices guidance for manufacturers
Clinical investigations of medical devices guidance for manufacturers November 2013 Contents Clinical investigation in the UK: requirements of the legislation... 3 Is a clinical investigation required:
Research Study Close-down and Archiving Procedures
Title: Outcome Statement: Research Study Close-down and Archiving Procedures To inform researchers of the process for closing down research studies, retaining and storing research materials in the Trust.
Clinical Investigator Inspections and FDA-483 Observations
Clinical Investigator Inspections and FDA-483 Observations Nancy A. Bellamy, Investigator Bioresearch Specialist/ BIMO Coordinator FDA Detroit District Office October 2, 2013 Objectives Background on FDA
National Decontamination Guidance on Loan Medical Devices (Reusable): Roles & Responsibilities GUID 5002
National Decontamination Guidance on Loan Medical Devices (Reusable): Roles & Responsibilities GUID 5002 July 2015 Contents Page 1.0 Executive summary... 3 2.0 Background... 4 3.0 Objective... 5 4.0 Scope...
2002 No. 618 CONSUMER PROTECTION. The Medical Devices Regulations 2002
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2002 No. 618 CONSUMER PROTECTION The Medical Devices Regulations 2002 Made - - - - - 20th May 2002 Laid before Parliament 21st May 2002 Coming into force - - 13th June 2002 ARRANGEMENT
R&D Administration Manager. Research and Development. Research and Development
Document Title: Document Number: Patient Recruitment SOP031 Staff involved in development: Job titles only Document author/owner: Directorate: Department: For use by: RM&G Manager, R&D Administration Manager,
RD SOP17 Research data management and security
RD SOP17 Research data management and security Version Number: V2 Name of originator/author: Dr Andy Mee, R&I Manager Name of responsible committee: R&I Committee Name of executive lead: Medical Director
PREP Course #27: Medical Device Clinical Trial Management
PREP Course #27: Medical Device Clinical Trial Management Presented by: Evelyn Huang Jeffrey Revello Office of Research Compliance North Shore-LIJ Health System CME Disclosure Statement The North Shore
Guide for Custom-Made Dental Device Manufacturers on Compliance with European Communities (Medical Devices) Regulations, 1994
Guide for Custom-Made Dental Device Manufacturers on Compliance with European Communities (Medical SUR-G0014-1 12 NOVEMBER 2013 This guide does not purport to be an interpretation of law and/or regulations
No. 706. Page 1 of 5. Issue Date 4/21/2014
Subject: ROUTINE MONITORING VISITS Standard Operating Procedure Prepared By: Beaumont Research Coordinating Center, Research Institute PURPOSE Prior Issue Date 8/15/2011 No. 706 Issue Date 4/21/2014 Page
US & CANADA: REGULATION AND GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL SOFTWARE AND APPS OR
US & CANADA: REGULATION AND GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL SOFTWARE AND APPS OR A MEDICAL DEVICE IS A MEDICAL DEVICE IS A MEDICAL DEVICE AHWP Medical SW Workshop Taipei, Taiwan November 3, 2012 John G. Abbott,
Policy Flowchart. Policy Title: Research Governance, Conduct and Management Policy. Reference and Version No: IG6 Version 5
Policy Title: Research Governance, Conduct and Management Policy Reference and Version No: IG6 Version 5 Author and Job Title: J Greenaway Research and Development Manager Executive Lead Medical Director
HOW TO; Report a Serious Incident Requiring Investigation (SIRI) or a Significant Event (SEA) to the Surrey and Sussex Area Team
HOW TO; Report a Serious Incident Requiring Investigation (SIRI) or a Significant Event (SEA) to the Surrey and Sussex Area Team Quality & Safety Team, Nursing Directorate. HOW TO. Report a serious incident
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Cancer Drug and Biological Products Clinical Data in Marketing Applications U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and
DRAFT FORMULA TO DETERMINE THE QUANTUM OF COMPENSATION IN CASE OF CLINICAL TRIAL RELATED INJURY (OTHER THAN DEATH)
DRAFT FORMULA TO DETERMINE THE QUANTUM OF COMPENSATION IN CASE OF CLINICAL TRIAL RELATED INJURY (OTHER THAN DEATH) The Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 provides under Rule 122DAB that in the case of clinical
Safety Alerts Management Policy
Safety Alerts Management Policy Version Number 1.1 Version Date February 2014 Policy Owner Author First approval or date last reviewed Staff/Groups Consulted Director of Nursing and Clinical Governance
Data Management & Case Report Form Development in Clinical Trials. Introduction to the Principles and Practice of Clinical Research.
Data Management & Case Report Form Development in Clinical Trials Introduction to the Principles and Practice of Clinical Research February 3, 2015 Marge Good, RN, MPH, OCN Nurse Consultant Division of
MEDICAL DEVICES INTERIM REGULATION
Issued by the Saudi Food and Drug Authority Board of Directors decree number 1-8-1429 and dated 27 December 2008 The Interim was published in Umm Al-QURA Journal year 86 Issue No:4249 dated in 17 April
Standard Operating Procedure. Clinical Trial Authorisation
Standard Operating Procedure for Clinical Trial Authorization Scope This SOP has been written to describe the procedure undertaken to apply for Clinical Trial Authorisation from Competent Authorities in
Reporting Adverse Events and Concerns at Stroger Hospital
Reporting Adverse Events and Concerns at Stroger Hospital Case Pt on coumadin comes in for community acquired pneumonia and is started on levaquin After several days, you note a lot of bruising.. You realize
DATA MANAGEMENT IN CLINICAL TRIALS: GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCHERS
Reference Number: UHB 139 Version Number: 2 Date of Next Review: 14 Apr 2018 Previous Trust/LHB Reference Number: N/A DATA MANAGEMENT IN CLINICAL TRIALS: GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCHERS Introduction and Aim
12.0 Investigator Responsibilities
v. 5.13.13 12.0 Investigator Responsibilities 12.1 Policy Investigators are ultimately responsible for the conduct of research. Research must be conducted according to the signed Investigator statement,
MRC. Clinical Trials. Series MRC GUIDELINES FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS. Medical Research Council
MRC Clinical Trials Series MRC GUIDELINES FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS 1998 Medical Research Council MRC GUIDELINES FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS 1998 MRC GUIDELINES FOR
Principal Investigator and Sub Investigator Responsibilities
Principal Investigator and Sub Investigator Responsibilities I. Purpose To define the roles and responsibilities of Principal Investigators conducting research at GRU. II. Definition The term Principal
Joint Research Office
Office Location: 1 st Floor Maple House 149 Tottenham Court Road London W1T 7DN Joint Research Office Postal Address: UCL, Gower Street London WC1E 6BT Email: [email protected] Tel No. 020
