Introduction Narrowing down the search Overview Assessment Detailed site assessments Summary and Recommendations...

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Introduction... 3. Narrowing down the search... 5. Overview Assessment... 14. Detailed site assessments... 16. Summary and Recommendations..."

Transcription

1

2

3 Contents Introduction... 3 Narrowing down the search... 5 Overview Assessment Detailed site assessments Summary and Recommendations Figures Figure 1: Map of sites in the Driffield to Bridlington area of need... 6 Figure 2: Map of sites in the Cottingham to Beverley area of need... 7 Figure 3: Summary Table

4 Introduction The consultation exercise The Council is undertaking a complementary consultation exercise to look for sites for traveller pitches which will run alongside the Local Plan consultation. This is being done on the basis that during the potential & preferred sites stage of the Local Plan consultation, no Gypsy and Traveller sites were submitted to the Council for consideration. Therefore there has been no public consultation so far on how and where these sites should be located, this consultation exercise seeks to address this situation by: 1. Defining the approach to the search and assessment of Gypsy sites; 2. Putting forward a range of potential sites for assessment; and 3. Suggesting preferred options for allocating Gypsy sites in the Local Plan The two sites at Carnaby, south of Moor Lane and Cottingham, Eppleworth Road, shown as preferred sites in the Allocations document, will be included in this exercise and comments will be invited on these sites. 1 The response to this exercise (and any alternative sites proposed) will be considered in drawing up the next 'Publication' draft of the Local Plan. Questions have been asked throughout this paper (shown in italics in the yellow boxes) which seek your views on how we have addressed the 3 main points above. Please could you register your responses to these questions, as well as any other comments you have at our website: Alternatively you can send your comments to: Forward Planning East Riding of Yorkshire Council County Hall Beverley HU17 9BA Telephone: forward.planning@eastriding.gov.uk The consultation period will run 6 weeks from the 25th of March to the 6th of May 2013 Background to this assessment The Council is required in preparing the Local Plan to have regard to meeting the needs of the gypsy and traveller community, this principally involves identifying a specific and suitable supply of sites to accommodate the need for pitches in the first 5 years of the plan period. Needs arising thereafter over the plan period also need to be addressed in the Local Plan but this can be done through a criteria based policy (as opposed to specific land allocations). A copy of the draft traveller policy is included in Appendix A of this paper. Failure to identify a 5 year supply of specific and suitable sites in the Plan could seriously impact on the 'soundness' of the Plan i.e. whether or not it is approved by a Planning Inspector. In addition, it will undermine the Council's ability to enforce against unauthorised development with the 1 The site area of both of these draft allocations is now considered to be too large. The site area of these allocations and all other potential allocations included in this document have been reduced to 0.5ha. 3

5 associated risk of such development being granted approval on appeal - potentially in locations which would be considered entirely inappropriate for such use. In order to identify a 5 year supply of specific and suitable sites the level of need has to be determined. The Council commissioned consultants to undertake a Gypsy and Traveller Needs Assessment (GTNA) in the autumn of The council already had a GTNA from 2008, the reason for undertaking a new needs assessment was based on recent evidence from other parts of the country highlighting the fact that out of date GTNA's (from around the same time period as 2008) being a cause of plans failing their soundness test. The GTNA was reported to Cabinet on the 11 th of December and outlined a need for 25 additional pitches over the initial 5 year period of the plan and 29 for the remainder of the plan period. The assessment also highlighted the broad locations where such new pitches should be provided, these being the Beverley to Cottingham area and the Driffield to Bridlington area. The assessment stated that pitches were needed in each of these areas of need in the first 5 years of the plan ( ). Having identified the level of need and the broad areas where it was needed, the GTNA then gave three options for how to address this need: 1. Develop an approach based on sites that are known to be viable and deliverable for Gypsies and Travellers; 2. Utilising an approach which identifies sites that are within good proximity to services and facilities; and 3. Focusing on identifying sites in proximity to existing Gypsy and Traveller populations. The first approach is focussed around finding land that was put forward by developers for Gypsy use or available land that is in the Council s ownership. Having a willing land owner in place is likely to increase the chance of the site being brought forward within the required timescale to meet the Gypsy and Traveller needs. Potential sites would need to be judged against criteria to ensure that they have access to an appropriate range of services and amenities. If this is not the case this could raise challenges of sites not being in the right locations to meet the needs and demands of existing Gypsy and Traveller communities. The second approach would focus provision into or near those larger settlements where there is a greater concentration of services and amenities. This would enable the communities to access these resources. This approach would be broadly consistent with the settlement network established in the draft Local Plan. Drawbacks of this approach may be that it may not focus the additional pitches where Gypsy and Traveller communities want them to be. There also may not be any deliverable land in these locations. The third approach is predicated on the fact that the main driver of demand for additional pitches in the East Riding is concealed households resulting from overcrowding. Therefore within this approach additional pitches should be sought in proximity to existing Gypsy and Traveller communities in the district. This could include options to extend existing sites where it is practicable to do so. This approach would mean that additional pitches would be provided where these communities are already established. This could be beneficial for families and extended families by causing less disruption. It is recognised that there may be some opposition to this option on the basis that it would exacerbate existing problems in such areas and that future need should be addressed elsewhere. In relation to extending existing sites consideration would also have to be given to the Designing Gypsy and Traveller Sites Good Practice Guide (2008) which suggests that a maximum of 15 pitches is conducive to providing a comfortable environment which is easy to manage. Expansion of any of the council s 3 sites would exceed this number. Taking the advantages and disadvantages of each approach into account, the council has decided to adopt a hybrid approach which incorporates positive aspects of all 3 of the approaches above. When 4

6 searching for new sites, land in the Council's ownership will be preferred wherever possible; this helps to ensure the deliverability of the sites proposed within the first 5 years of the plan period. Proximity to existing sites will be considered a positive factor when assessing sites, as this enables the travelling community to be close to relatives and ensures minimal disruption. The search and assessment of sites will also consider the proximity of services and facilities; this is an important consideration because traveller sites in remote areas are unlikely to be used by travellers if they are too far from essential services such as schools and healthcare. Consideration has also been given to using land in appropriate locations in other ownerships. To date no such land has been offered to the Council for such use. The proposed approach does however allow for such land to be identified where other land in Council ownership is either not available or deemed suitable or deliverable. In such circumstances the council acknowledges that there will be a requirement to reach an agreement with the landowner over such a use and/or to acquire such land on a voluntary basis or through a Compulsory Purchase Order. Question 1: Do you agree with the councils approach to the provision of gypsy and traveller sites? Narrowing down the search The scope for the wider search for Gypsy sites has been shaped by three parameters. The first and foremost of these were the areas of need for traveller pitch provision outlined in the GTNA, these being the Beverley to Cottingham area and the Driffield to Bridlington area. Sites outside of these two broad areas were not considered. Given the clear message provided in the 2012 GTNA regarding most need being from within the area, the Council has also been keen to explore opportunities to extend existing authorised sites to meet needs arising. The second important parameter relate to the sustainability of the site and planning considerations. The factors considered relate to the main points outlined in section 11 of the National Planning Policy for traveller sites (included as Appendix B in this paper). These include locating Gypsies and Travellers near to health and education services and areas of employment, avoiding areas of high flood risk and considering the environmental quality of the sites. Any sites which did not comply with the National Guidance were considered to be unviable and were not considered or were discounted at the overview assessment stage. The third parameter was the ownership of the land, in order to show that a site is suitable it has to be deliverable, i.e. the owner of the land is willing to allow the land to be sold and or used for accommodating Gypsies and Travellers. No private sites have been submitted to the Council despite a call for sites in two rounds of public consultation for the local plan and a call for sites to the local Gypsy and Traveller community, in the first instance therefore the Council has had to consider land in its own ownership in the areas of need. Question 2: Are these the correct parameters to use? Can you suggest any others? Under these three parameters 16 sites (including the two sites shown as preferred options in the Allocations DPD) were chosen in a variety of locations within the two areas of search (shown in figures 1&2). Most of the sites are situated on agricultural fields and most are considered to be within a reasonable distance from essential services including healthcare, employment and education. 5

7 All the sites have been drawn up at around half a hectare in area, as this is considered to be the optimal size (according to current design standards) to accommodate the 12 to 13 pitches to be provided in each area of need. Question 3: What are your views on the range of sites shown? Can you suggest any other potential Gypsy and Traveller sites to those shown? Figure 1: Map of sites in the Driffield to Bridlington area of need 6

8 Figure 2: Map of sites in the Cottingham to Beverley area of need 7

9 The above key relates to the Draft Policies shown on the maps shown above and below. 8

10 BRID47 Land at White Hill, Scarborough Road, Bridlington. This site is owned by the Council, it comprises part of an agricultural field. The land slopes gently upwards to the west and there is an existing tree and hedgerow screening on the eastern edge of the site. Access can be taken from a track that leads to White Hill Close. BRID48 Land east of North Mount, Bempton Lane, Bridlington. This site is owned by the Council, it comprises part of an agricultural field. The site is flat with long views of the surrounding area, there is little existing screening on site. Access can be obtained from Bempton Lane. BRID49 Land north of County Farm, Scarborough Road, Bridlington. This site is owned by the Council, it comprises part of an agricultural field on the edge of Bridlington. The land slopes gently upwards to the west and there is an existing tree and hedgerow screening on the eastern edge of the site. 9

11 BRID50 Land north of Woldgate, Bridlington. This site is part of a wider area of land owned by the council to the north of Woldgate, all of which lies on top of a former land fill site. Part of this site was the location of a former gypsy site which was moved to the southern side of Woldgate. The reason for this relocation was directly related to contamination from the land fill site. BRID51 Land south of Woldgate, Bridlington. This site is agricultural land which is in private ownership. It is adjacent to the existing site on Woldgate. The site has minimal screening and has an upward gradient to the south. CAR20 Land south of Moor Lane, Carnaby. This site is owned by the Council, it comprises part of an agricultural field south of the Carnaby Industrial Estate. This site was chosen as a preferred site in the Draft Local Plan. The site is flat with some hedgerow screening on its western edge. Access can be obtained from the lane adjacent to the sites western edge. 10

12 CAR23 Land east of Wilsthorpe Roundabout, Carnaby. This site is owned by the Council, it comprises part of an agricultural field. The proposed site has been set back from the lane to avoid the flood risk area. The site is flat with substantial tree and hedgerow screening on its western edge. Access can be obtained from the lane on its northern boundary. CAR24 Land east of Sticks Farm, Carnaby This site is owned by the Council, it comprises part of a flat agricultural field. There is some screening for the site from the trees along the main road. Access can be obtained from Kingsgate. COT54 Land at Eppleworth Road, Cottingham. The land is owned by the Council and was chosen as a preferred site in the Draft Local Plan. It is located adjacent to an existing Gypsy site and access would have to be obtained through here. The site comprises an agricultural field which slopes upwards to the south. There is existing hedgerow screening on the northern edge of the site. 11

13 COT55 Land west of Woodhill Way, Cottingham. The land is owned by the Council and comprises part of an agricultural field which slopes upwards to the south. The site is in close proximity to an existing gypsy and traveller site to the east of Woodhill Way. Access can be obtained from Woodhill Way. DRF41 Land west of Green Lane, Driffield. The land is owned by the Council and comprises part of an agricultural field. The site has long views of the surrounding area, there is no existing screening on site. Gaining an access directly from the A164 may prove difficult. LISS1 Depot at Mill Hill, New Cut, Lissett. The land is owned by the Council and is comprised of an aggregates depot. Piles of aggregates are present on site, a patchy screening of trees is present around the edge of the site. Access can be obtained from New Court. 12

14 KIL17 Land north of Back Lane, Kilham. The land is owned by the Council and comprises part of an agricultural field which slopes upwards to the north. Access can be obtained from Back Lane. The site has existing hedgerow screening on its eastern and southern boundaries. SKID7 Land south of Westfield Road, Skidby. The land is owned by the Council and comprises part of an agricultural field. The site is set back from the road to avoid an area of high flood risk. The site has little existing screening and slopes upwards to the south. Access can be obtained from Westfield Road. SKR1 Land at Meggison s Turnpike, Skerne. The land is owned by the Council and comprises part of an agricultural field. The site is flat and has a screening of mature trees on its northern boundary. Access can be obtained from Driffield Road. 13

15 WOOD29 Land at Beverley Parks Crossing, Long Lane, Woodmansey. The land is owned by the Council and comprises part of an agricultural field. The site is placed to avoid the area of high flood risk along the Beverley Parks Sewer. The site is flat with long views of the surrounding area, there is little existing screening on site. Access can be taken from Long Lane or Shepherds Lane. Overview Assessment The above sites have been subjected to an overview assessment which considers the merits and negatives of each. The factors considered relate to the main points outlined in section 11 of the National Planning Policy, regarding guidance for planning for traveller sites (see appendix B). These include locating Gypsies and Travellers near to health and education services, avoiding areas of high flood risk and considering the environmental quality of the sites. Unless otherwise stated, all sites are in the ownership of the Council and are considered as being available and deliverable for the proposed use. Due to the limited scale of development proposed, it is not considered that there will be any adverse effect on existing services or infrastructure in relation to any of the proposed allocations to the extent that proposed allocations are discounted at this stage. Further consideration of this and other site specific matters is included the detailed site assessment score. Any sites which did not comply with the National Guidance were considered to be unviable and were discounted at stage one, those that had no major constraints were to be assessed in detail with the Council s Site Assessment Methodology in stage two. Stage One Overview Assessment Table Site Merits Constraints Outcome BRID47 No known constraints on site. Very remote from services and facilities Discounted BRID48 No known constraints on site. Very remote from services and facilities Discounted BRID49 No known constraints on site. Close to services and facilities. Through to stage 2 BRID50 Close to services and facilities. Close proximity to existing Gypsy and Traveller site. Former landfill site, very high contamination risk. Discounted 14

16 BRID51 Close to services and facilities. Close proximity to existing Gypsy and Traveller site. Not council owned land Through to stage 2 CAR20 No known constraints on site. Close to the employment opportunities at the Carnaby Industrial Estate. Remote from some services and facilities Through to stage 2 CAR23 No known constraints on site. Close to the employment opportunities at the Carnaby Industrial Estate. Remote from some services and facilities Through to stage 2 CAR24 No known constraints on site. Remote from some services and facilities. Possible access constraints. Through to stage 2 COT54 Close proximity to existing Gypsy and Traveller site. No known constraints on site. Through to stage 2 COT55 No known constraints on site. Close proximity to existing Gypsy and Traveller site. Through to stage 2 DRF41 No known constraints on site. Very remote from services and facilities. Possible access constraints. Discounted KIL17 No known constraints on site. Very remote from services and facilities. Discounted LISS1 Very remote from any services or facilities. Former landfill site, high contamination risk. Discounted SKR1 No known constraints on site. Very remote from any services or facilities Discounted SKID7 No known constraints on site. Very remote from any services or facilities, Discounted WOOD29 No known constraints on site. Remote from some services and facilities Through to stage 2 Question 4: Do you agree with the sites that have been discounted/taken through to stage 2? 15

17 Detailed site assessments 8 sites were assessed in detail by the Site Assessment Methodology (SAM), which has 33 questions designed to assess the impact of a proposed development site. Question 5: Do you have any views on the ways the sites have been assessed in the SAM? Figure 3 provides an overall summary of the assessment proposal for all of the potential sites. This results in 3 sites out of the 8 being considered as suitable for future use as a traveller site. The remaining 5 sites are not considered suitable for a range of reasons. Detailed site assessments for each site are set out after the summary table. 16

18 Figure 3: Summary Table BRID49 BRID51 CAR20 CAR23 CAR24 COT54 COT55 WOOD29 Question STAGE 1 Initial Assessment & Site Exclusion Conformity with Settlement Network (1) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Biodiversity and Geological Value (2) No No No No No No No No Flood Risk & Coastal Change (3) No No No No No No No No Heritage Assets (4) No No No No No No No No STAGE 2 Initial Ranking Greenfield & Brownfield Land (5) Accessibility by Public Transport (6) Accessibility by Walking & Cycling (7) Flood Risk (8) STAGE 3 Detailed Site Specific Considerations Settlement Vision (9) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Biodiversity and Geological Value (10) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) Wildlife & Natural Environment (11) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Heritage Assets (12) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Built Character (13) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Landscape Character (14) (---) (-) (-) (-) (---) (-) (---) (---) Air Quality (15) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Agricultural Land (16) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) Groundwater (17) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (-) (0) (0) Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses (18) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Contaminated Land (19) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) +++ (0) (0) Mineral Resources (20) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Renewable and Low Carbon Energy (21) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Publicly Accessible Open Space (22) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) School Capacity (23) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (0) (0) (-) Utilities Infrastructure Capacity (24) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) Highway Network Capacity (25) (0) (0) (0) (-) (0) (0) (0) (0) Wider Non-Road Transport Network (26) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Community Facilities (27) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Town Centre Vitality and Viability (28) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Regeneration or Economic Benefits (29) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Affordable Housing (30) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A STAGE 4 Deliverability Insumountable Constraints (31) No No No No No No No No Ownership and Market Constraints (32) No No No No No No No No Deliverability (33) Not considered 0-5 years 0-5 years Not considered Not considered 0-5 years Not considered Not considered suitable for allocation suitable for allocation suitable for allocation suitable for allocation suitable for allocation 17

19 BRID49 Question Outcome Reasoning Basic Information Land bid number Site area (ha) 0.47 Proposed use Gypsy and Traveller Site Date received Additional information STAGE 1 Initial Assessment & Site Exclusion Conformity with Settlement Network (1) Yes Located within the Driffield to Bridlington Area of Search identified in Strategy Document Policy H3 Biodiversity and Geological Value (2) No No effect on International or National site of biological or geological interest (subject confirmation as a result of Habitats Regulations Screening Report). Flood Risk & Coastal Change (3) No Not in functional floodplain or affected by coastal erosion. Heritage Assets (4) No No substantial harm to any nationally designated asset. STAGE 2 Initial Ranking Greenfield & Brownfield Land (5) 1 100% Greenfield land Accessibility by Public Transport (6) 4 Accessibility by Walking & Cycling (7) 0 Flood Risk (8) 6 Highly vulnerable use within flood zone 1 STAGE 3 Detailed Site Specific Considerations Settlement Vision (9) (0) Little impact on vision or sub-area policy. Biodiversity and Geological Value (10) (--) Legally protected species recorded within 500m of this site. Wildlife & Natural Environment (11) (0) No significant effect. Low hedgerow and indiviual trees on road frontage but these are capable of being Heritage Assets (12) (0) No harm to any heritage assets. Built Character (13) (0) The site is remote from the main built form of the settlement and therefore has little impact on it. Landscape Character (14) (---) Located within the highest quality Yorkshire Wolds Important Landscape Area which is extremely sensitive to development. The site is detached from the settlement and likely to have a significant impact on landscape Air Quality (15) (0) Air quality acceptable. Proposed use is not likely to adversely affect this. Agricultural Land (16) (-) Minor loss of best and most versatile agricultural land (Grade 3a) Groundwater (17) (0) Development would not affect public drinking water supply. Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses (18) (0) Housing would be compatible with surrounding agricultural land uses. Contaminated Land (19) (0) Development is not on land likely to be contaminated. Mineral Resources (20) (0) Not within a relevant safeguarding or preferred area or area of search. Renewable and Low Carbon Energy (21) (0) No information submitted to demonstrate use of renewable, very low carbon energy or to reduce greenhouse gas emissions above that required by the Strategy policies. Publicly Accessible Open Space (22) (0) No effect on existing publicly accessible open space or PROW or any obvious potential/opportunity for provision of new open space above that required by the Strategy Document. School Capacity (23) (-) The Infrastructure Delivery Plan identifies there may be a need to increase the capacity of the primary Utilities Infrastructure Capacity (24) (-) Additional investment in the extra high voltage electricity distribution network will be required to serve developments in the area. The existing waste water treatment works has sufficient capacity to accommodate Highway Network Capacity (25) (0) No highway issues anticipated Wider Non-Road Transport Network (26) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. Community Facilities (27) (0) No proposed new or loss of existing facilities. Town Centre Vitality and Viability (28) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. Regeneration or Economic Benefits (29) (0) No effect on a recognised regeneration strategy or a deprived area. Affordable Housing (30) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. STAGE 4 Deliverability Insurmountable Constraints (31) No No known constraints Ownership and Market Constraints (32) No No known constraints. Deliverability (33) Not considered suitable for allocation The site is within the Yorkshire Wolds Important Landscape Area and the proposed development would have a significantly detrimental effect on the highly sensitive and very open and rural character of the area. 18

20 BRID51 Question Outcome Reasoning Basic Information Land bid number Site area (ha) 0.53 Proposed use Gypsy and Traveller Site Date received Additional information STAGE 1 Initial Assessment & Site Exclusion Conformity with Settlement Network (1) Yes Located within the Driffield to Bridlington Area of Search identified in Strategy Document Policy H3 Biodiversity and Geological Value (2) No No effect on International or National site of biological or geological interest (subject confirmation as a result of Habitats Regulations Screening Report). Flood Risk & Coastal Change (3) No Not in functional floodplain or affected by coastal erosion. Heritage Assets (4) No No substantial harm to any nationally designated asset. STAGE 2 Initial Ranking Greenfield & Brownfield Land (5) 1 100% Greenfield land Accessibility by Public Transport (6) 6 - Accessibility by Walking & Cycling (7) 1 - Flood Risk (8) 6 Highly vulnerable use within flood zone 1 STAGE 3 Detailed Site Specific Considerations Settlement Vision (9) (0) Little impact on vision or sub-area policy. Biodiversity and Geological Value (10) (--) Legally protected species recorded within 500m of this site. Within 1km of a Local Wildlife Site. Wildlife & Natural Environment (11) (0) No significant effect or existing features can be retained Heritage Assets (12) (0) Unlikely to result in harm to any heritage assets Built Character (13) (0) The site is remote from the main built form of the settlement and therefore has little impact on it. Landscape Character (14) (-) LCA assesses area as ordinary landscape quality. It is decribed as having a relatively high capacity for outdoor recretional activities that would provide opportunities to better integrate the urban edge with the rural landscape. It is also adjacent to t Air Quality (15) (0) Air quality acceptable and not adversely effected. Agricultural Land (16) (-) Loss of best and most versatile agricultural land (Grade 2/3a) Groundwater (17) (0) Development would not affect public drinking water supply Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses (18) (0) Development would be compatible with adjacent uses Contaminated Land (19) (0) Development is not on land likely to be contaminated. Mineral Resources (20) (0) Not within a relevant safeguarding or preferred area or area of search. Renewable and Low Carbon Energy (21) (0) No information submitted to demonstrate use of renewable, very low carbon energy or to reduce greenhouse gas emissions above that required by the Strategy policies. Publicly Accessible Open Space (22) (0) No effect on existing publicly accessible open space or PROW or any obvious potential/opportunity for provision of new open space above that required by the Strategy Document. School Capacity (23) (-) The Infrastructure Delivery Plan identifies there may be a need to increase the capacity of the primary school(s) serving this settlement. Utilities Infrastructure Capacity (24) (-) Additional investment in the extra high voltage electricity distribution network will be required to serve developments in the area. The existing waste water treatment works has sufficient capacity to accommodate proposed growth. Bridlington is connected Highway Network Capacity (25) (0) No highway issues anticipated Wider Non-Road Transport Network (26) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. Community Facilities (27) (0) No proposed new or loss of existing facilities. Town Centre Vitality and Viability (28) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. Regeneration or Economic Benefits (29) (0) No effect on a recognised regeneration strategy or a deprived area. Affordable Housing (30) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. STAGE 4 Deliverability Insurmountable Constraints (31) No No known constraints Ownership and Market Constraints (32) No No known constraints. Deliverability (33) 0-5 years Location adjacent to exisitng site is logical and less prominent than other options 19

21 Question Outcome Reasoning Basic Information Land bid number Site area (ha) 0.50 Proposed use Date received Additional information STAGE 1 Initial Assessment & Site Exclusion Gypsy and Traveller Site 20/11/2012 CAR20 Conformity with Settlement Network (1) Yes Located within the Driffield to Bridlington Area of Search identified in Strategy Document Policy H3 Biodiversity and Geological Value (2) No No effect on International or National site of biological or geological interest (subject confirmation as a result of Habitats Regulations Screening Report) Flood Risk & Coastal Change (3) No Not in functional floodplain or affected by coastal erosion Heritage Assets (4) No No substantial harm to any nationally designated asset STAGE 2 Initial Ranking Greenfield & Brownfield Land (5) 1 100% Greenfield land Accessibility by Public Transport (6) 3 Accessibility by Walking & Cycling (7) 0 Flood Risk (8) 6 Highly vulnerable use in Flood Zone 1. STAGE 3 Detailed Site Specific Considerations Settlement Vision (9) (0) Little impact on vision or sub-area policy Biodiversity and Geological Value (10) (--) Site is within 1KM of Carnaby Covert Local Wildlife Site. 1 Legally protected species, Whiskered Bat (Myotis mystacinus) recorded within 500m of this site. Wildlife & Natural Environment (11) (0) No significant effect- no features important to wildlife on site. Heritage Assets (12) (0) No harm to any heritage assets Built Character (13) (0) The site is remote from the main built form of the settlement and therefore has little impact on it. Landscape Character (14) (-) Not within the Yorkshire Wolds Important Landscape Area. Currently very open and rural site where develoment would significantly affect character. However the site could be screened from the main road A165 with substantial planting/mounding. Air Quality (15) (0) Air quality acceptable. Proposed use is not likely to adversely affect this. Agricultural Land (16) (-) Minor loss of best and most versatile agricultural land (Grade 2/3a) Groundwater (17) (0) Development would not affect public drinking water supply Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses (18) (0) Development would be generally compatible with adjacent uses. Site is seperated from nearby uses by open fields. Contaminated Land (19) (0) No contamination on site Mineral Resources (20) (0) Not within a relevant safeguarding or preferred area or area of search. Renewable and Low Carbon Energy (21) (0) No information submitted to demonstrate use of renewable, very low carbon energy or to reduce greehouse gas emissions Publicly Accessible Open Space (22) (0) No effect on existing publicly accessible open space or PROW or any obvious potential/opportunity for provision of new open space above that required by the Core Strategy policy. School Capacity (23) (-) The Infrastructure Delivery Plan identifies there may be a need to increase the capacity of the primary school(s) serving this Utilities Infrastructure Capacity (24) (-) Additional investment in the extra high voltage electricity distribution network will be required to serve developments in the area. The existing waste water treatment works has sufficient capacity to accommodate proposed growth. Carnaby parish is not con Highway Network Capacity (25) (0) No significant highways issues anticipated. Wider Non-Road Transport Network (26) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. Community Facilities (27) (0) No proposed new or loss of existing facilites Town Centre Vitality and Viability (28) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. Regeneration or Economic Benefits (29) (0) No effect on a recognised regeneration strategy or a deprived area Affordable Housing (30) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. STAGE 4 Deliverability Insurmountable Constraints (31) No No known constraints Ownership and Market Constraints (32) No No known constraints. Deliverability (33) 0-5 years Less vialually prominent than other sites subject to suitable additional screening from A

22 Question Outcome Reasoning Basic Information Land bid number Site area (ha) 0.48 Proposed use Date received Additional information STAGE 1 Initial Assessment & Site Exclusion Conformity with Settlement Network (1) Yes Located within the Driffield to Bridlington Area of Search identified in Strategy Document Policy H3 Biodiversity and Geological Value (2) No No effect on International or National site of biological or geological interest (subject confirmation as a result of Habitats Regulations Screening Report) Flood Risk & Coastal Change (3) No Not in functional floodplain or affected by coastal erosion Heritage Assets (4) No No substantial harm to any nationally designated asset STAGE 2 Initial Ranking Greenfield & Brownfield Land (5) 1 100% Greenfield land Accessibility by Public Transport (6) 3 Accessibility by Walking & Cycling (7) 0 Flood Risk (8) 6 Highly vulnerable use in Flood Zone 1. (site access would be across Flood Zone 3a) STAGE 3 Detailed Site Specific Considerations Settlement Vision (9) (0) Little impact on vision or sub-area policy Biodiversity and Geological Value (10) (--) Site is within 1km of Carnaby Covert Local Wildlife Site. 1 Legally protected species, Whiskered Bat (Myotis mystacinus) recorded within 500m of this site. Wildlife & Natural Environment (11) (0) No significant effect - no wildlife features effected. Heritage Assets (12) (0) No harm to any heritage assets Built Character (13) (0) The site is remote from the main built form of the settlement and therefore has little impact on it. Landscape Character (14) (-) Not within the Yorkshire Wolds Important Landscape Area. However, very open, flat and rural site and in a prominent position on a main entrance road to the town where development would significantly affect landscape character. No existing natural Air Quality (15) (0) Air quality acceptable. Proposed use is not likely to adversely affect this. Agricultural Land (16) (-) Minor loss of best and most versatile agricultural land (Grade 2/3a) Groundwater (17) (0) Development would not affect public drinking water supply Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses (18) (0) Development would be generally compatible with adjacent uses. Site is seperated from nearby uses by open fields. Contaminated Land (19) (0) No contamination on site Mineral Resources (20) (0) Not within a relevant safeguarding or preferred area or area of search. Renewable and Low Carbon Energy (21) (0) No information submitted to demonstrate use of renewable, very low carbon energy or to reduce greehouse gas emissions Publicly Accessible Open Space (22) (0) No effect on existing publicly accessible open space or PROW or any obvious potential/opportunity for provision of new open space above that required by the Core Strategy policy. School Capacity (23) (-) The Infrastructure Delivery Plan identifies there may be a need to increase the capacity of the primary school(s) serving this Utilities Infrastructure Capacity (24) (-) Additional investment in the extra high voltage electricity distribution network will be required to serve developments in the area. The existing waste water treatment works has sufficient capacity to accommodate proposed growth. Carnaby parish is not con Highway Network Capacity (25) (-) Access along relatively long and narrow track. Wider Non-Road Transport Network (26) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. Community Facilities (27) (0) No proposed new or loss of existing facilites Town Centre Vitality and Viability (28) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. Regeneration or Economic Benefits (29) (0) No effect on a recognised regeneration strategy or a deprived area Affordable Housing (30) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. STAGE 4 Deliverability Insurmountable Constraints (31) No No known constraints Ownership and Market Constraints (32) No No known constraints. Deliverability (33) Gypsy and Traveller Site 20/11/2012 Not considered suitable for allocation CAR23 The site is in a sensitive area of very open and flat farmland and close to an important entrance route to the town. Development would be very prominent and detrimental to the otherwise very open and rural aspect and character. Access along single width t 21

23 Question Outcome Reasoning Basic Information Land bid number Site area (ha) 0.50 Proposed use Date received Additional information STAGE 1 Initial Assessment & Site Exclusion Conformity with Settlement Network (1) Yes Located within the Driffield to Bridlington Area of Search identified in Strategy Document Policy H3 Biodiversity and Geological Value (2) No No effect on International or National site of biological or geological interest (subject confirmation as a result of Habitats Regulations Screening Report) Flood Risk & Coastal Change (3) No Not in functional floodplain or affected by coastal erosion Heritage Assets (4) No No substantial harm to any nationally designated asset STAGE 2 Initial Ranking Greenfield & Brownfield Land (5) 1 100% Greenfield land Accessibility by Public Transport (6) 3 Accessibility by Walking & Cycling (7) 0 Flood Risk (8) 6 Highly vulnerable use in Flood Zone 1. STAGE 3 Detailed Site Specific Considerations Settlement Vision (9) (0) Little impact on vision or sub-area policy Biodiversity and Geological Value (10) (--) Site is within 1KM of Carnaby Covert Local Wildlife Site. 1 Legally protected species, Whiskered Bat (Myotis mystacinus) recorded within 500m of this site. Wildlife & Natural Environment (11) (0) No significant effect- no features important to wildlife on site. Heritage Assets (12) (0) No harm to any heritage assets Built Character (13) (0) The site is remote from the main built form of the settlement and therefore has little impact on it. Landscape Character (14) (---) Whilst the site is not located within the Yorkshire Wolds Important Landscape Area, the site is close to the road within a very flat and relatively open situation. The site is partially screened from the main road A165 by some tree planting along the road Air Quality (15) (0) Air quality acceptable. Proposed use is not likely to adversely affect this. Agricultural Land (16) (-) Minor loss of best and most versatile agricultural land (Grade 2) Groundwater (17) (0) Development would not affect public drinking water supply Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses (18) (0) Development would be generally compatible with adjacent uses. Site is seperated from nearby uses by open fields. Contaminated Land (19) (0) No contamination on site Mineral Resources (20) (0) Not within a relevant safeguarding or preferred area or area of search. Renewable and Low Carbon Energy (21) (0) No information submitted to demonstrate use of renewable, very low carbon energy or to reduce greehouse gas emissions Publicly Accessible Open Space (22) (0) No effect on existing publicly accessible open space or PROW or any obvious potential/opportunity for provision of new open space above that required by the Core Strategy policy. School Capacity (23) (-) The Infrastructure Delivery Plan identifies there may be a need to increase the capacity of the primary school(s) serving this Utilities Infrastructure Capacity (24) (-) Additional investment in the extra high voltage electricity distribution network will be required to serve developments in the area. The existing waste water treatment works has sufficient capacity to accommodate proposed growth. Carnaby parish is not con Highway Network Capacity (25) (0) No significant highways issues anticipated. Access would have to be taken straight from the A165. Wider Non-Road Transport Network (26) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. Community Facilities (27) (0) No proposed new or loss of existing facilites Town Centre Vitality and Viability (28) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. Regeneration or Economic Benefits (29) (0) No effect on a recognised regeneration strategy or a deprived area Affordable Housing (30) N/A Not relevant for Gypsy and Traveller use. STAGE 4 Deliverability Insurmountable Constraints (31) No No known constraints Ownership and Market Constraints (32) No No known constraints. Deliverability (33) Gypsy and Traveller Site 20/11/2012 Not considered suitable for allocation CAR24 The site is in a very sensitive and highly visible situation and on an important entrance route to the town. Any development would be very prominent and detrimental to the otherwise very open and rural aspect and character. 22

24 COT 54 Question Outcome Reasoning Basic Information Land bid number Site area (ha) 0.5 Proposed use Gypsy and Traveller Site Date received Additional information STAGE 1 Initial Assessment & Site Exclusion Conformity with Settlement Network (1) Yes Located within the Cottingham to Beverley Area of Search identified in Strategy Document Policy H3 Biodiversity and Geological Value (2) No No effect on International or National site of biological or geological interest (subject confirmation as a result of Habitats Regulations Screening Report) Flood Risk & Coastal Change (3) No Not in functional floodplain or affected by coastal erosion Heritage Assets (4) No No substantial harm to any nationally designated asset STAGE 2 Initial Ranking Greenfield & Brownfield Land (5) 1 100% Greenfield land Accessibility by Public Transport (6) 5 Accessibility by Walking & Cycling (7) 0 Flood Risk (8) 6 Highly vulnerable use in Flood Zone 1. STAGE 3 Detailed Site Specific Considerations Settlement Vision (9) (0) Little impact on vision or sub-area policy Biodiversity and Geological Value (10) (--) Legally protected species recorded within 500m of this site. Site is adjacent to a Local Wildlife Site. Wildlife & Natural Environment (11) (0) No significant effect or existing features can be retained. Heritage Assets (12) (0) No heritage assets effected. Built Character (13) (0) The site is remote from the main built form of the settlement and therefore has little impact on it. Landscape Character (14) (-) Site is located in the Wolds Area of High Landscape Value and is assessed to have a high sensitivity to development. The site is on a steep slope and substantial excavation of the chalk escarpment would be required in order to avoid excessive Air Quality (15) (0) Air quality acceptable and not degraded by development. Agricultural Land (16) (-) Minor loss of the best and most versatile agricultural land Groundwater (17) (-) SPZ Zone 3 impacts can be mitigated. Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses (18) (0) Compatible with adjoining uses. Contaminated Land (19) +++ Possible landfill in the centre of the site. The potentially contaminated land is likely to be remediated through appropriate planning conditions and/or suitable design/layout. Mineral Resources (20) (0) Not within a relevant safeguarding or preferred area or area of search. Renewable and Low Carbon Energy (21) (0) No information submitted to demonstrate use of renewable, very low carbon energy or to reduce greehouse gas emissions Publicly Accessible Open Space (22) (0) No effect on existing publicly accessible open space or PROW or any obvious potential/opportunity for provision of new open space above that required by the Core Strategy policy. School Capacity (23) (0) The Infrastructure Delivery Plan does not identify a need to increase the capacity of the schools serving this settlement. Utilities Infrastructure Capacity (24) (-) Additional investment in the extra high voltage electricity distribution network will be required to serve developments in the area. The existing waste water treatment works has sufficient capacity to accommodate proposed growth. Cottingham is connected t Highway Network Capacity (25) (0) No significant highways issues anticipated Wider Non-Road Transport Network (26) N/A Not relevant for housing use. Community Facilities (27) (0) No community facility lost or proposed. Town Centre Vitality and Viability (28) N/A Not relevant for housing use. Regeneration or Economic Benefits (29) (0) No effect on a recognised regeneration strategy or a deprived area Affordable Housing (30) N/A Not relevant for a Gypsy and Traveller site. STAGE 4 Deliverability Insurmountable Constraints (31) No No known constraints. Ownership and Market Constraints (32) No No known constraints. Deliverability (33) 0-5 years Depends on the site being excavated in order to to reduce landscape impact on sensitive landscpe but extension to exsiting site would be logical and less prominent than other options. 23

25 COT 55 Question Outcome Reasoning Basic Information Land bid number Site area (ha) 0.47 Proposed use Gypsy and Traveller Site Date received Additional information STAGE 1 Initial Assessment & Site Exclusion Conformity with Settlement Network (1) Yes Located within the Cottingham to Beverley Area of Search identified in Strategy Document Policy H3 Biodiversity and Geological Value (2) No No effect on International or National site of biological or geological interest (subject confirmation as a result of Habitats Regulations Screening Report) Flood Risk & Coastal Change (3) No Not in functional floodplain or affected by coastal erosion Heritage Assets (4) No No substantial harm to any nationally designated asset STAGE 2 Initial Ranking Greenfield & Brownfield Land (5) 1 100% Greenfield land Accessibility by Public Transport (6) 4 Accessibility by Walking & Cycling (7) 0 Flood Risk (8) 6 Highly vulnerable use in Flood Zone 1. STAGE 3 Detailed Site Specific Considerations Settlement Vision (9) (0) Little impact on vision or sub-area policy Biodiversity and Geological Value (10) (--) Legally protected species recorded within 500m of this site. Site adjacent to a Local Wildlife Site. Wildlife & Natural Environment (11) (0) No significant effect or existing features can be retained. Heritage Assets (12) (0) No harm to any heritage assets Built Character (13) (0) The site is remote from the main built form of the settlement and therefore has little impact on it. Landscape Character (14) (---) Whilst not within the Imprtant Landscape Area, the site is part of a very open and gently sloping agricultural field which is highly visible from the A164 and therefore extremely sensitive to development. Development of the site would significantly impact Air Quality (15) (0) Air quality acceptable and not degraded by development. Agricultural Land (16) (-) Minor loss of best and most versatile agricultural land (Grade 2) Groundwater (17) (0) Site within Zone II (outer protection). Mitigation measures may be needed to protect groundwater supply. Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses (18) (0) Compatible with adjacent land uses Contaminated Land (19) (0) Development is not located on land that is likely to be contaminated. Mineral Resources (20) (0) Site falls within a sand and gravel safeguarding area. Can be pre-extracted - not withing a preferred area or area of search. Renewable and Low Carbon Energy (21) (0) No information submitted to demonstrate use of renewable, very low carbon energy or to reduce greehouse gas emissions Publicly Accessible Open Space (22) (0) No effect on existing publicly accessible open space or PROW or any obvious potential/opportunity for provision of new open space above that required by the Strategy policy. School Capacity (23) (0) The Infrastructure Delivery Plan does not identify a need to increase the capacity of the schools serving this settlement. Utilities Infrastructure Capacity (24) (-) Additional investment in the extra high voltage electricity distribution network will be required to serve developments in the area. The existing waste water treatment works has sufficient capacity to accommodate proposed growth. Cottingham is connected t Highway Network Capacity (25) (0) No junction/highway improvements would be required Wider Non-Road Transport Network (26) N/A Not relevant to proposed use. Community Facilities (27) (0) No community facility lost or proposed. Town Centre Vitality and Viability (28) N/A Not relevant for housing use. Regeneration or Economic Benefits (29) (0) No effect on a recognised regeneration strategy or a deprived area Affordable Housing (30) N/A Within area where ratio of average house price is under 8 times the average income. STAGE 4 Deliverability Insurmountable Constraints (31) No No known constraints. Ownership and Market Constraints (32) No No known constraints. Deliverability (33) Not considered suitable for allocation Whilst not within the Imprtant Landscape Area, the site is part of a very open and gently sloping agricultural field which is highly visible from the A164 and therefore extremely sensitive to development. Development of the site would significantly impact 24

Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners

Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners Action the COI Table Of Contents Introduction... 3 Benefit of carrying out a site assessment... 4 How to carry out a site assessment

More information

Draft New Museums Site Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL SCREENING REPORT

Draft New Museums Site Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL SCREENING REPORT Draft New Museums Site Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL SCREENING REPORT MAY 2015 1 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 DRAFT NEW MUSEUMS SITE SPD 4 3 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL

More information

There are access points readily available into the site.

There are access points readily available into the site. Site Name Reference Number Settlement Land at Broughton Atterbury U4 Size (Ha) 4. Broughton Planning history/context This section provides a brief overview of any significant planning history on the site

More information

Development proposals will require to demonstrate, according to scale, type and location, that they:-

Development proposals will require to demonstrate, according to scale, type and location, that they:- Appendix 2 : Relevant Development Plan Policies Angus Local Plan Review 2009 Policy S1 : Development Boundaries (a) Within development boundaries proposals for new development on sites not allocated on

More information

The achievement of all indicators for policies in the whole plan collectively contribute to the delivery of Policy 1

The achievement of all indicators for policies in the whole plan collectively contribute to the delivery of Policy 1 Cornwall Local Plan 2010-2030: Proposed Monitoring Framework Part 1: Strategic Policies Policy 1: Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development Policy 2: Spatial Strategy Policy 2a Key Targets Job provision

More information

Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Beech Lane, Kislingbury. Persimmon Homes Midlands March 2015

Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Beech Lane, Kislingbury. Persimmon Homes Midlands March 2015 Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Beech Lane, Kislingbury Persimmon Homes Midlands March 2015 Contents Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Beech Lane, Kislingbury 1.INTRODUCTION 1.1

More information

LEWES DISTRICT AND SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY LEWES DISTRICT JOINT CORE STRATEGY INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION

LEWES DISTRICT AND SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY LEWES DISTRICT JOINT CORE STRATEGY INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION 1 LEWES DISTRICT AND SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY LEWES DISTRICT JOINT CORE STRATEGY INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION STATEMENT BY CROUDACE STRATEGIC LIMITED ISSUES 7 AND 8 STRATEGIC SITES (POLICIES SP5/SP6)

More information

approval of matters specified in conditions; and The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013

approval of matters specified in conditions; and The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013 Application for: planning permission; planning permission in principle; further applications; approval of matters specified in conditions; and mineral workings (if the planning authority do not have a

More information

Site Alternative Deliverability Report. SALT 034 Ty Nant, Groesffordd Resubmission: Deliverable. Local Development Plan

Site Alternative Deliverability Report. SALT 034 Ty Nant, Groesffordd Resubmission: Deliverable. Local Development Plan Local Development Plan Site Alternative Deliverability Report Brecon Beacons National Park Authority SALT 034 Ty Nant, Groesffordd Resubmission: Deliverable SALT 034 Ty Nant Groesffordd (Llanfrynach) Existing

More information

THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 Grant of Planning Permission

THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 Grant of Planning Permission Civic Offices Havant Hampshire PO9 2AX Tel (023)9247 4174 Fax(023)9244 6588 DX50005 Havant www.havant.gov.uk To: ADP Architects Ltd Richmond Court 94 Botley Road Park Gate Southampton, Hants SO311BA For:

More information

(Part 2 of 2) February 2016. 50511/JG/AJk

(Part 2 of 2) February 2016. 50511/JG/AJk Kirklees Local Plan Representations in Support of site at Windy Bank Lane, Hightown (H596) (Part 2 of 2) KeyLand Developments Ltd February 2016 50511/JG/AJk Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners 3rd Floor 15

More information

The Roaches Asset Management Review. Draft Objectives for External Consultation. Fundamental Principles

The Roaches Asset Management Review. Draft Objectives for External Consultation. Fundamental Principles The Roaches Asset Management Review Draft Objectives for External Consultation Fundamental Principles the area of land under review is the Roaches Estate and Gradbach Car Park as shown on the attached

More information

Stowmarket Area Action Plan (AAP) Examination

Stowmarket Area Action Plan (AAP) Examination Stowmarket Area Action Plan (AAP) Examination Main Matters, Issues and Questions Matter 3 - Employment (Appendix) This contains additional information in support of the Hearing Statement and relates to

More information

St Albans Local Development Framework. Core Strategy: Spatial Strategy Options

St Albans Local Development Framework. Core Strategy: Spatial Strategy Options Centre for Sustainability St Albans Local Development Framework Core Strategy: Spatial Strategy Options Sustainability Appraisal (incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment) Working Note September

More information

Assessment of Site Deliverability in the Market Towns

Assessment of Site Deliverability in the Market Towns East Cambridgeshire District Council of Site Deliverability in the Market Towns August 2014 Annex 1 to the Site Results Technical Background Paper (February 2013) 0 Contents: 1. Introduction 1.1 Role of

More information

City Plan Part 1 Sustainability Appraisal Summary February 2012

City Plan Part 1 Sustainability Appraisal Summary February 2012 City Plan Part 1 Sustainability Appraisal Summary February 2012 1.0 Introduction The Council is in the process of preparing its new Local Plan in consultation with the public, developers, landowners and

More information

Coventry Development Plan 2016 Appendix 89. Glossary of Key Terms

Coventry Development Plan 2016 Appendix 89. Glossary of Key Terms Coventry Development Plan 2016 Appendix 89 Glossary of Key Terms Area Action Plan A Development Plan Document which focuses upon a specific location or an area subject to significant change. Affordable

More information

What do we already know about Bradford-on-Avon community area?

What do we already know about Bradford-on-Avon community area? What do we already know about Bradford-on-Avon community area? Bradford-on-Avon is one of the smaller market towns in Wiltshire. It has good public transport connectivity and functions as a popular tourist

More information

10.1 WILL HEY FARM WATFORD LANE NEW MILLS RETENSION OF NEW STABLE BLOCK, SAND PADDOCK AND ASSOCIATED EARTHWORKS AND LANDSCAPING (FULL - MINOR)

10.1 WILL HEY FARM WATFORD LANE NEW MILLS RETENSION OF NEW STABLE BLOCK, SAND PADDOCK AND ASSOCIATED EARTHWORKS AND LANDSCAPING (FULL - MINOR) HPK/2012/0207 03/04/2012 WILL HEY FARM WATFORD LANE NEW MILLS MR & MRS M WILSON KIRSTY WILSON EQUINE AND WILL HEY FARM BED & BREAKFAST RETENSION OF NEW STABLE BLOCK, SAND PADDOCK AND ASSOCIATED EARTHWORKS

More information

22.01 SETTLEMENT 24/04/2014 C73

22.01 SETTLEMENT 24/04/2014 C73 22.01 SETTLEMENT 24/04/2014 C73 22.01-1 Urban Growth and Development 24/04/2014 C73 This policy applies to the urban areas and fringes of Portland, Heywood, Casterton, Dartmoor, Nelson, Cape Bridgewater,

More information

AGENT(S) / APPLICANT(S): AGENT Dave Dickerson, DK Architects. APPLICANT Halton Housing Trust. DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOCATION: Greenspace.

AGENT(S) / APPLICANT(S): AGENT Dave Dickerson, DK Architects. APPLICANT Halton Housing Trust. DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOCATION: Greenspace. APPLICATION NO: 14/00168/FUL LOCATION: Land to the west of 19 Crow Wood Lane, Widnes. PROPOSAL: Proposed erection of 10 no. 1 bedroom apartments with individual access doors arranged in 2no. 2 storey height

More information

COPCUT RISE COPCUT RISE DROITWICH SPA CONSULTATION STATEMENT. November 2010. Prepared by Capita Lovejoy on behalf of William Davis Limited

COPCUT RISE COPCUT RISE DROITWICH SPA CONSULTATION STATEMENT. November 2010. Prepared by Capita Lovejoy on behalf of William Davis Limited COPCUT RISE DROITWICH SPA CONSULTATION STATEMENT COPCUT RISE November 2010 Prepared by Capita Lovejoy on behalf of William Davis Limited Copcut Rise Land north of Copcut Lane, Droitwich Spa: Consultation

More information

AGRICULTURAL BUILDING WITH PHOTOVOLTARIC SOLAR PANELS TO SOUTH FACING ROOF

AGRICULTURAL BUILDING WITH PHOTOVOLTARIC SOLAR PANELS TO SOUTH FACING ROOF DC/2015/00494 AGRICULTURAL BUILDING WITH PHOTOVOLTARIC SOLAR PANELS TO SOUTH FACING ROOF LAND AT ONEN, ADJACENT TO B4233, NP25 5EN. RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE Case Officer: Elizabeth Bennett Date Registered:

More information

SUBJECT: Housing Development Proposals Outside of Local Development Plan (LDP) Development Boundaries.

SUBJECT: Housing Development Proposals Outside of Local Development Plan (LDP) Development Boundaries. Appendix 1 Denbighshire County Council PLANNING STRATEGY DEVELOPER GUIDANCE NOTE November 2015 SUBJECT: Housing Development Proposals Outside of Local Development Plan (LDP) Development Boundaries. Context

More information

Sustainability Appraisal of the Lichfield Local Plan: Strategy

Sustainability Appraisal of the Lichfield Local Plan: Strategy Lichfield District Council Sustainability Appraisal of the Lichfield Local Plan: Strategy Post Adoption Statement February 2015 U R S U S C O N S U L T I N G L T D Quality Management URSUS Consulting Ltd

More information

Living & Working Managing Natural Resources and Waste

Living & Working Managing Natural Resources and Waste Living & Working Managing Natural Resources and Waste 5.13 Managing Natural Resources and Waste Background 5.13.1 This chapter focuses on how we manage resources within the AONB. It includes renewable

More information

Site Alternative Deliverability Report. SALT 033 Former Mid Wales Hospital, Talgarth Resubmission: Undeliverable. Local Development Plan

Site Alternative Deliverability Report. SALT 033 Former Mid Wales Hospital, Talgarth Resubmission: Undeliverable. Local Development Plan Local Development Plan Site Alternative Deliverability Report Brecon Beacons National Park Authority SALT 033 Former Mid Wales Hospital, Talgarth Resubmission: Undeliverable SALT 033 Former Mid Wales Hospital

More information

Planning Policy Statement 2015

Planning Policy Statement 2015 Planning Policy Statement 2015 Introduction It is just over 50 years since national planning legislation was first implemented in Ireland. The Government wishes to reaffirm its strong belief in the value

More information

Chapter 2 Spatial Portrait

Chapter 2 Spatial Portrait 15 November 2013 Dear Julie Fylde Local Plan to 2030 Part 1 Preferred Options Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you on 9 October in respect of the above mentioned document. As discussed at the

More information

1 Welcome. The exhibition comprises a series of boards which provide some background information to show you our initial ideas for the site.

1 Welcome. The exhibition comprises a series of boards which provide some background information to show you our initial ideas for the site. 1 Welcome Thank you for taking the time to attend this public exhibition of our proposals for residential development on Land at Daws Farm, Back Road, Writtle (site shown opposite). The exhibition comprises

More information

FIRST STREET NORTH CREATING PLACES FOR PEOPLE

FIRST STREET NORTH CREATING PLACES FOR PEOPLE About This Consultation Manchester City Council and Ask Property Developments are seeking to develop First Street North, a 2.2 acre site to the north of the Number One Building, within the 20 acre First

More information

Relating to Supplementary Guidance Rural Development (RD) 1 and Special Types of Rural Land (STRL) type 2.

Relating to Supplementary Guidance Rural Development (RD) 1 and Special Types of Rural Land (STRL) type 2. PLANNING ADVICE 13/2012 HOUSING AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTRYSIDE AND GREENBELT Relating to Supplementary Guidance Rural Development (RD) 1 and Special Types of Rural Land (STRL) type 2. CONTENTS

More information

Paragraph 9 Exemption The reclamation or improvement of land

Paragraph 9 Exemption The reclamation or improvement of land The reclamation or improvement of land 1 INTRODUCTION This document provides guidance, definitions, operational policy and strategy with regard registering a paragraph 9 exemption under Schedule 1 of the

More information

Key Facts. Passenger growth at the airport is projected to grow to approximately 3 million passengers per annum by 2030.

Key Facts. Passenger growth at the airport is projected to grow to approximately 3 million passengers per annum by 2030. Bournemouth Airport & Business Park 7 7 Bournemouth Airport & Business Park Introduction 7.1 Bournemouth Airport is a key asset for the region, one of the UK s fastest growing regional airports and is

More information

The NSS - Rural Development and Rural Settlement

The NSS - Rural Development and Rural Settlement The NSS - Rural Development and Rural Settlement Spatial Planning Unit, Department of the Environment and Local Government, February 2003 Introduction. This paper has three main parts that outline: (1)

More information

APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION FOR A SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY AT KINGS CLIFFE LANDFILL SITE, STAMFORD, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE

APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION FOR A SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY AT KINGS CLIFFE LANDFILL SITE, STAMFORD, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION FOR A SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY AT KINGS CLIFFE LANDFILL SITE, STAMFORD, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Report Reference: AU/KC/SPH/1449/01/D&A/FIN Baddesley

More information

Carmarthenshire LDP Site Assessment Proforma

Carmarthenshire LDP Site Assessment Proforma Carmarthenshire LDP Site Assessment Proforma 1. Site Details Ref: SC1/h1 Site Ref (where applicable): Location: Parc Puw, Drefach Felindre Site Area (Ha): Eisting Use* *if candidate site as proposed by

More information

WELCOME PROPOSALS FOR PENTAVIA RETAIL PARK WELCOME TO OUR EXHIBITION WHICH SETS OUT OUR PLANS TO DEVELOP THE PENTAVIA RETAIL PARK SITE.

WELCOME PROPOSALS FOR PENTAVIA RETAIL PARK WELCOME TO OUR EXHIBITION WHICH SETS OUT OUR PLANS TO DEVELOP THE PENTAVIA RETAIL PARK SITE. WELCOME WELCOME TO OUR EXHIBITION WHICH SETS OUT OUR PLANS TO DEVELOP THE PENTAVIA RETAIL PARK SITE. The purpose of the exhibition is to provide the community with the opportunity to view our initial ideas

More information

Digital Communications

Digital Communications National Assembly for Wales Election Manifesto 2016 Digital Communications Digital growth is key to driving the Welsh economy forward, which is why innovative policies are needed to meet the increasing

More information

understanding Sustainable Landscaping & Tree Preservation Standards

understanding Sustainable Landscaping & Tree Preservation Standards understanding Sustainable Landscaping & Tree Preservation Standards Purpose To promote landscaping around development that is compatible with the existing environment, and which reduces greenhouse gas

More information

Rural dwellings including bed and breakfast accommodation

Rural dwellings including bed and breakfast accommodation MORNINGTON PENINSULA SHIRE COUNCIL - INTERIM POLICY - JUNE 2011 Rural dwellings including bed and breakfast accommodation This policy applies to the use and development of land for a dwelling, including

More information

Mount Browne (Surrey Police Head Quarters), Sandy Lane, Guildford Vision Statement. November 2013. with

Mount Browne (Surrey Police Head Quarters), Sandy Lane, Guildford Vision Statement. November 2013. with Mount Browne (Surrey Police Head Quarters), Sandy Lane, Guildford Vision Statement November 2013 with Tibbalds Planning & Urban Design 19 Maltings Place 169 Tower Bridge Road London SE1 3JB Telephone 020

More information

PLANNING APPLICATION: 12/00056/APP

PLANNING APPLICATION: 12/00056/APP PLANNING APPLICATION: 12/00056/APP In the event that a recommendation on this planning application is overturned the Committee is reminded of the advice contained on the front page of the agenda for Reports

More information

Reference: 05/00928/FUL Officer: Mr David Jeanes

Reference: 05/00928/FUL Officer: Mr David Jeanes DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD 5 January 2006 Reference: 05/00928/FUL Officer: Mr David Jeanes Location: Proposal: Applicant: Whiffens Farm Clement Street Sutton-At-Hone Kent BR8 7PQ Retrospective application

More information

3.0 Table of Development Note: This table must be read in conjunction with the explanation provided in Part 5, Division 1, Chapter 2 Using Domains.

3.0 Table of Development Note: This table must be read in conjunction with the explanation provided in Part 5, Division 1, Chapter 2 Using Domains. Part 5 Division 2 Chapter 2 Domains Domains Park Living 1.0 Intent The purpose of this domain is to provide a variety of opportunities for low density residential activity within areas of semi-rural landscapes,

More information

Site Deliverability Statement Alternative Site at: Bridge Road, Old St Mellons

Site Deliverability Statement Alternative Site at: Bridge Road, Old St Mellons Site Deliverability Statement Alternative Site at: Bridge Road, Old St Mellons Representor Number 1135 AS(N)4 Persimmon Homes 9 th February 2015 Contents Site Deliverability Statement Alternative Site

More information

Appendix 6- Key Employment Sites Deliverability and Timescales

Appendix 6- Key Employment Sites Deliverability and Timescales Appendix 6- Key Employment Sites Deliverability and Timescales Site Ross-on-wye Model Farm 10 ha Model Farm is in Herefordshire Council s ownership. A hybrid planning permission for site infrastructure

More information

Decision Due Date: 18 April 2015

Decision Due Date: 18 April 2015 App.No: 150195 Decision Due Date: 18 April 2015 Ward: Devonshire Officer: Richard Elder Site visit date: 8 May 2015 Site Notice(s) Expiry date: 27 March 2015 Neighbour Con Expiry: 27 March 2015 Press Notice(s):

More information

Planning, Design & Access Statement

Planning, Design & Access Statement Planning, Design & Access Statement Hazell House, Burnthurst Lane, Princethorpe Client: Warwickshire & Northamptonshire Air Ambulance IG Land & Planning 1 Thornton Close, Crick, Northants, NN6 7GE Tel/Fax

More information

National Planning Policy for Waste

National Planning Policy for Waste National Planning Policy for Waste October 2014 Department for Communities and Local Government Crown copyright, 2014 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this

More information

Redland City Council. 1. Recommendation. 2. Local government metrics. The Commission recommends:

Redland City Council. 1. Recommendation. 2. Local government metrics. The Commission recommends: 1. Recommendation The Commission recommends: (i) the existing local government area of Redland Shire Council remains unchanged; (ii) the local government be renamed Redland City Council; (iii) the local

More information

Construction of a pedestrian footbridge between Chiswick Business Park and Bollo Lane/Colonial Drive.

Construction of a pedestrian footbridge between Chiswick Business Park and Bollo Lane/Colonial Drive. planning report D&P/2857b/01 30 November 2015 Bollo Lane, Chiswick Business Park and Colonial Drive, Chiswick in the London Borough of Ealing planning application no. PP/2015/5442 Strategic planning application

More information

Report to Planning applications committee Item Date 6 March 2014 Head of planning services

Report to Planning applications committee Item Date 6 March 2014 Head of planning services Report to Planning applications committee Item Date 6 March 2014 Report of Head of planning services 4(7) Subject 13/02051/F Former Wellesley First School Wellesley Avenue North Norwich NR1 4NT Description:

More information

PLANNING & REGULATION COMMITTEE 16 JANUARY 2012

PLANNING & REGULATION COMMITTEE 16 JANUARY 2012 Division(s): Sutton Courtenay & Harwell Contact Officer: John Duncalfe (john.duncalfe@oxfordshire.gov.uk) Tel: 01865 815356 PLANNING & REGULATION COMMITTEE 16 JANUARY 2012 TO CRUSH, SCREEN, BLEND AND STOCK

More information

K M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU

K M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU Application No: 11/2196N Location: Proposal: Applicant: Expiry Date: K M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU Extension and New Store Mr Dan Mellor 17-Aug-2011 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Approve

More information

Key Themes for Langham s Neighbourhood Plan

Key Themes for Langham s Neighbourhood Plan 2014 Key Themes for Langham s Neighbourhood Plan What is a Neighbourhood Plan? The concept of a Neighbourhood Plan was introduced via the Localism Act of 2011. It gives communities the right to shape the

More information

Development Brief for New Lodge, Bank Mill Lane Berkhamsted. Adopted November 2007

Development Brief for New Lodge, Bank Mill Lane Berkhamsted. Adopted November 2007 Development Brief for New Lodge, Bank Mill Lane Berkhamsted Adopted November 2007 This publication seeks your opinions about the design, layout and requirements for new housing development at New Lodge,

More information

DEVELOPMENT BRIEF FOR LAND AT ALLOA ROAD, TULLIBODY

DEVELOPMENT BRIEF FOR LAND AT ALLOA ROAD, TULLIBODY DEVELOPMENT BRIEF FOR LAND AT ALLOA ROAD, TULLIBODY 1.0 Introduction and Purpose 1.1 Clackmannanshire Council is seeking to dispose of a site at Alloa Road, Tullibody for redevelopment. The site extends

More information

Kirklees Draft Local Plan Development Plan Document

Kirklees Draft Local Plan Development Plan Document Development Plan Representation - Kirklees Draft Local Plan Development Plan Document On behalf of Taylor Wimpey (Penistone Road, Shelley Site H169) January 2016 1. Introduction Spawforths have been instructed

More information

Site No 17 Former Weston Vinyls Site, Frome Location

Site No 17 Former Weston Vinyls Site, Frome Location Location Former Weston Vinyls site is situated on the A362 Vallis Road in the Western Part of Frome. The surrounding uses are primarily residential with residential to the North East and West. The Vallis

More information

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results SURVEY BACKGROUND The 2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey was distributed in September in an effort to obtain feedback about the level of support for various priorities identified in the draft Comprehensive

More information

KENCOT HILL SOLAR PARK, OXFORDSHIRE PLANNING BRIEFING DOCUMENT. on behalf of MR TAD CZAPSKI FEBRUARY 2011

KENCOT HILL SOLAR PARK, OXFORDSHIRE PLANNING BRIEFING DOCUMENT. on behalf of MR TAD CZAPSKI FEBRUARY 2011 KENCOT HILL SOLAR PARK, OXFORDSHIRE PLANNING BRIEFING DOCUMENT on behalf of MR TAD CZAPSKI FEBRUARY 2011 Prepared by: ROBINSON & HALL LLP Land & Property Consultants 118 Bromham Road Bedford MK40 2QN 01234

More information

Site Specific Policies Local Plan

Site Specific Policies Local Plan A N E W V I S I O N F O R D E V E L O P I N G W A K E F I E L D D I S T R I C T Site Specific Policies Local Plan Local Development Framework www.wakefield.gov.uk/ldf Site Specific Policies Local Plan

More information

FLOOD RISK STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE CONNECTING HERNE BAY AREA ACTION PLAN PREFERRED OPTIONS DOCUMENT

FLOOD RISK STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE CONNECTING HERNE BAY AREA ACTION PLAN PREFERRED OPTIONS DOCUMENT FLOOD RISK STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE CONNECTING HERNE BAY AREA ACTION PLAN PREFERRED OPTIONS DOCUMENT Canterbury City Council January 2008 1 APPLICATION OF THE PPS25 SEQUENTIAL AND EXCEPTION TESTS 1.0

More information

London Borough of Waltham Forest LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. Summary Document

London Borough of Waltham Forest LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. Summary Document LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Summary Document October 2013 Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary 1 Introduction 2 Partner responsibilities 3 What do we know about flooding in the borough?

More information

The Green Belt A Guide for Householders

The Green Belt A Guide for Householders The Green Belt A Guide for Householders Introduction Much of Mole Valley lies within the Metropolitan Green Belt. This leaflet outlines the purpose, importance and characteristics of the Green Belt and

More information

A new Garden Neighbourhood for West Guildford An opportunity for Smart Growth. university of surrey November 2013

A new Garden Neighbourhood for West Guildford An opportunity for Smart Growth. university of surrey November 2013 A new Garden Neighbourhood for West Guildford An opportunity for Smart Growth university of surrey November 2013 A new Garden Neighbourhood for West Guildford Preface Since the County and Borough Councils

More information

Corporate Director Environment and Community Services

Corporate Director Environment and Community Services CABINET Meeting date: 27 November 2014 From: Corporate Director Environment and Community Services RESPONSE TO SOUTH LAKELAND DISTRICT COUNCILS COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY REGULATION 16 CONSULTATION

More information

Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Bridgnorth Road, Much Wenlock. Persimmon Homes October 2013

Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Bridgnorth Road, Much Wenlock. Persimmon Homes October 2013 Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Bridgnorth Road, Much Wenlock Persimmon Homes October 2013 Contents Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Bridgnorth Road, Much Wenlock. 1.INTRODUCTION

More information

PLANNING POLICY 3.3.5

PLANNING POLICY 3.3.5 PLANNING POLICY 3.3.5 CHILD CARE PREMISES 1. Introduction A Child Care Premises is used to provide a child care service within the meaning of the Child Care Services Act 2007, but does not include a Family

More information

Draft Winchester District Local Plan Part 2. Recommended Responses to Issues Raised WALTHAM CHASE

Draft Winchester District Local Plan Part 2. Recommended Responses to Issues Raised WALTHAM CHASE Draft Winchester District Local Plan Part 2 Recommended Responses to Issues Raised WALTHAM CHASE 1. A summary of all the representations on the draft Local Plan directly relating to Waltham Chase was presented

More information

Proposal for a Demonstration Exemplar at British Sugar, York

Proposal for a Demonstration Exemplar at British Sugar, York Executive 21 July 2009 Report of the Director of City Strategy URBAN ECO SETTLEMENT Proposal for a Demonstration Exemplar at British Sugar, York Summary 1. This paper outlines a proposal for funding a

More information

Relaxation of planning rules for change of use from commercial to residential

Relaxation of planning rules for change of use from commercial to residential Relaxation of planning rules for change of use from commercial to residential Summary of consultation responses and the Government s response to the consultation Relaxation of planning rules for change

More information

Shaping Whanganui. Have your say, korero mai

Shaping Whanganui. Have your say, korero mai Shaping Whanganui Have your say, korero mai Outer Commercial Design Guidelines Discussion Document Background The Outer Commercial zone of the District Plan sits on the outside of the central shopping

More information

REPORTS SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENT 11 MAY 2015 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING OF COUNCIL

REPORTS SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENT 11 MAY 2015 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING OF COUNCIL REPORT NO: 0.0 REPORT TITLE: SOURCE: DIVISION: FILE NO: POLICY: - STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Planning Scheme Amendment C202: 140-204 Western Avenue, Westmeadows Gareth Edgley, Senior Strategic Planner City Sustainability

More information

Manchester City Council Item 6 Planning and Highways Committee 8 May 2014

Manchester City Council Item 6 Planning and Highways Committee 8 May 2014 Application Number 104843/FO/2014/N1 Date of Appln 28th Feb 2014 Committee Date 8th May 2014 Ward Moston Ward Proposal Location Applicant Agent Change of use of ground floor to a hot food takeaway (Fish

More information

CHANGE OF USE FROM AGRICULTURE TO A USE FOR CARAVAN STORAGE COMPOUND AND OPERATIONAL DEVELOPMENT.

CHANGE OF USE FROM AGRICULTURE TO A USE FOR CARAVAN STORAGE COMPOUND AND OPERATIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2014/1898 BIRMINGHAM ROAD MERIDEN Application No: Ward/Area: Location: 2014/1898/S MERIDEN BIRMINGHAM ROAD MERIDEN Date Registered: 21/11/2014 Applicant: Proposal: MR VAUGHN WILLIAMS CHANGE OF USE FROM

More information

4 Alternatives and Design Evolution

4 Alternatives and Design Evolution 4 Introduction 4.1 This Chapter describes the considerations and constraints influencing the siting, layout and massing of the Development. It also describes the main alternatives to the Development that

More information

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

NOTICE OF PREPARATION PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF SUNNYVALE P.O. BOX 3707 SUNNYVALE, CA 94088-3707 NOTICE OF PREPARATION TO: Responsible, Trustee, and Other Interested Public Agencies FROM: Sunnyvale Community Development 456

More information

Camden Development Policies

Camden Development Policies Camden Local Development Framework Camden Development Policies Adoption version 2010 1 CAMDEN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CAMDEN DEVELOPMENT POLICIES Camden Development Policies 2010 Introduction 1. Location

More information

Healthcare and New Housing Development

Healthcare and New Housing Development Healthcare and New Housing Development Supplementary Guidance SG11 Consultative Draft SG11 SG11 Supplementary Guidance A suite of supplementary guidance (SGs) is currently being produced by the Council.

More information

AGENDA LARIMER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, April 20, 2016/6:30 P.M./Commissioners' Hearing Room

AGENDA LARIMER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, April 20, 2016/6:30 P.M./Commissioners' Hearing Room AGENDA LARIMER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, April 20, 2016/6:30 P.M./Commissioners' Hearing Room A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE COUNTY LAND USE CODE D. PUBLIC

More information

Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 18 March 2009 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager

Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 18 March 2009 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 18 March 2009 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager 4(9) 09/161 Alteration and Extension to Existing Public House to Provide a New Bookmakers

More information

Rural Residential Buildable Lands Inventory

Rural Residential Buildable Lands Inventory The Dalles Periodic Review, May 2013 Rural Residential Lands Inventory Contents Introduction and Summary... 1 Concerns related to the 2007 Analysis... 2 Rural Residential Capacity Summary... 2 Methodology...

More information

Welcome Welcome to the public exhibition for development at Bowman Field. This exhibition provides an overview of the proposals for the site.

Welcome Welcome to the public exhibition for development at Bowman Field. This exhibition provides an overview of the proposals for the site. Welcome Welcome to the public exhibition for development at Bowman Field. This exhibition provides an overview of the proposals for the site. Background & Planning Context The Site The site is an area

More information

Prior Notification of Proposed Demolition Validation Checklist

Prior Notification of Proposed Demolition Validation Checklist Prior Notification of Proposed Demolition Validation Checklist Introduction Submitting your application can be made easier by ensuring you have submitted all of the necessary information. Should important

More information

Pre-Application Planning Advice

Pre-Application Planning Advice Pre-Application Planning Advice Guidance Note and Schedule of Fees Regeneration and Planning (Development Management) December 2014 The Development Management Service is responsible for the determination

More information

23.1 RENEWABLE ENERGY

23.1 RENEWABLE ENERGY Proposed Hastings District Plan as Amended 23.1 Renewable Energy 23.1 RENEWABLE ENERGY 23.1.1 INTRODUCTION The use of energy is of fundamental importance to the function and development of our society.

More information

Planning application process improvements

Planning application process improvements Planning application process improvements Government response to consultation January 2015 Department for Communities and Local Government Crown copyright, 2015 Copyright in the typographical arrangement

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION...1 Purpose of a Comprehensive Plan...1 McKenzie County Comprehensive Plan...1 Definitions...2 Goal...2 Vision...

TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION...1 Purpose of a Comprehensive Plan...1 McKenzie County Comprehensive Plan...1 Definitions...2 Goal...2 Vision... MCKENZIE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 Purpose of a Comprehensive Plan...1 McKenzie County Comprehensive Plan...1 Definitions...2 Goal....2 Vision...3 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT...4

More information

Relevant Planning History P/2006/1070: Demolition of building and construction of supermarket and 14 2 bed flats. Withdrawn.

Relevant Planning History P/2006/1070: Demolition of building and construction of supermarket and 14 2 bed flats. Withdrawn. P/2010/1404/MPA St Marychurch Ward Former G A Insurance Buildng, Greenway Road/St Marychurch Road, St Marychurch Torquay Demolition of former G A building; formation of up to 7 retail units for purposes

More information

Introduction. Two storey & first floor rear extensions. two storey rear 1

Introduction. Two storey & first floor rear extensions. two storey rear 1 Introduction This advice leaflet has been produced to help in the planning of your house extension, by identifying the main points to consider, in order to achieve an acceptable proposal. This leaflet

More information

National and Major Developments

National and Major Developments National and Major Developments An Agency Joint Statement on Pre-application Engagement A Joint Statement by Architecture and Design Scotland, Forestry Commission Scotland, Historic Scotland, Scottish

More information

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, 2015 1512-SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, 2015 1512-SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24 Petition Number: Subject Site Address: Petitioner: Request: East side of Oak Road, north of 151 st Street Langston Development Co. Primary Plat and Overall Development Plan amendment review for Mapleridge

More information

Planning Policy Statement 8 (PPS 8) Open Space, Sport and Outdoor Recreation

Planning Policy Statement 8 (PPS 8) Open Space, Sport and Outdoor Recreation Planning Policy Statement 8 (PPS 8) Open Space, Sport and Outdoor Recreation Planning Policy Statements (PPSs) set out the policies of the Department of the Environment on particular aspects of land-use

More information

Subject: APPLICATION 10/02650/CA. DEMOLITION OF YOUTH CLUB, DEEPDALE LANE, BOSTON SPA, WETHERBY.

Subject: APPLICATION 10/02650/CA. DEMOLITION OF YOUTH CLUB, DEEPDALE LANE, BOSTON SPA, WETHERBY. Originator: Victoria Hinchliff Walker Tel: 39 51343 Report of the Chief Planning Officer PLANS PANEL EAST Date: 28 th October 2010 Subject: APPLICATION 10/02650/CA. DEMOLITION OF YOUTH CLUB, DEEPDALE LANE,

More information

COUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO.

COUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO. COUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO. 6 RENEWABLE ENERGY Image Source: (Word Clip Art Stock Photo, 2011) Date: May, 2015 BACKGROUND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 789

More information

Development Layout Design

Development Layout Design Development Layout Design General Design Considerations for Adoptable Highways Version 1 June 2012 Transportation, Waste and Environment Service Issue and Revisions Record Revision Date Originator Purpose

More information

4.4 ECOCITY Tampere - Vuores

4.4 ECOCITY Tampere - Vuores 4.4 ECOCITY Tampere - Vuores Figure 4.4.1 Location of the Vuores area 4.4.1 General information The Vuores case area is a typical greenfield development in a woodland area to the south of the city of Tampere.

More information

BIDFORD PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Consultation Document on Draft Policies 25th May 2015 6th July 2015

BIDFORD PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Consultation Document on Draft Policies 25th May 2015 6th July 2015 BIDFORD ON-AVON PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN Consultation Document on Draft Policies 25th May 2015 6th July 2015 www.bidfordonavon-pc.gov.uk PLEASE FEEL FREE TO MAKE YOUR COMMENTS

More information