More changes to private health insurance Australia
|
|
- Luke Blair
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 More changes to private health insurance Australia Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (12) 2008 Author(s): Marion Haas Health Policy Issues: Role Private Sector Current Process Stages Idea Pilot Policy Paper Legislation Implementation Evaluation Change 1. Abstract The Australian government has proposed changes to the Medicare levy surcharge. Since 1997 high-income Australians have faced a 1% tax penalty if they did not purchase private health insurance. The proposal has been the subject of much debate in the media and a parliamentary inquiry. It faces opposition in the Senate where the government does not have a majority. 2. Purpose of health policy or idea The objective of the goverment's proposal is to raise the income thresholds at which individuals and couples without private health insurance (PHI) face a surcharge equal to 1% of their income. The proposal is to increase the thresholds from $AUS50,000 to $AUS100,000 for singles and from $AUS100,000 to $AUS 150,000 for couples. The expected outcomes of the policy are that some individuals and families may choose to drop their PHI cover, thus effectively saving money and increasing their disposable income. If the pool of privately insured young and healthy people drops, PHI premiums are likely to rise. Any substantial drop in membership may place smaller PHI companies under financial pressure, increasing the likelihood that they will merge with or be taken over by larger companies. Some commentators have claimed that the policy will also place additional pressure on the public hospital system as those without PHI are more likely to use the public system. Main objectives The objective is to raise the income thresholds at which individuals and couples without private health insurance (PHI) face a surcharge equal to 1% of their income. The surcharge was initially introduced to encourage higher income earners to take out PHI. In the years since its introduction, incomes have risen but the thresholds have remained static. The new government claims that the income threshold now place an additional and unacceptable tax burden on middle income earners, not just those on high incomes. When the Medicare Levy Surcharge was introduced it affected the top 12% of income earners
2 Type of incentives The policy is likely to create incentives for some individuals and couples (most likely young, healthy people) to drop PHI cover. It may also create incentives for PHI premiums to rise and for some PHI companies to go out of business (ie to be taken over by or merge with another company). It may also create incentives for individuals to increase their utilisation of the public hospital system. Groups affected Individuals and couples with incomes affected by the proposed changes, PHI companies, Public and private hospitals 3. Characteristics of this policy Degree of Innovation traditional innovative Degree of Controversy consensual highly controversial Structural or Systemic Impact marginal fundamental Public Visibility very low very high Transferability strongly system-dependent system-neutral This is an amendment to an existing policy. Although it has created a great deal of debate, its actual effect is unlikely to be significant, in terms of government savings or expenditure. It is controversial because the government does not have a majority in the Senate and the political mileage and media coverage is thus magnified. It has high public visibility because of the media coverage but also because of its potential impacts on individual's incomes and PHI premiums. The public-private mixed system in Australia is unique and one of its most unique features is the extent of publicly funded support for the private sector, including the PHI industry. Therefore, this policy is unlikely to be replicated elsewhere. 4. Political and economic background This policy has been proposed by the Labor government which was elected to office in November As part of its election policy, the Labor party promised to increase funding for health, in particular for the public health system. The Medicare levy surcharge was initially introduced to encouraged higher income earners to take out PHI. In the years since its introduction, incomes have risen and the new government claims that the issue it is attempting to address is one of fairness - the income thresholds now place an additional burden on middle income earners, not just those on high incomes. The surcharge was introduced by the previous Liberal (conservative) government as part of a raft of policies designed to encourage Australians to take out PHI cover - as a result the government at that time was perceived as a strong supporter of the PHI industry. Any changes to such policies will be perceived as reduced government support for the industry. Change of government The new Labor goverment claims that the change is necessary because the current income thresholds no longer limits the surcharge to those on high incomes
3 5. Purpose and process analysis Idea Pilot Policy Paper Legislation Implementation Evaluation Change Origins of health policy idea The proposed changes were introduced as part of the first budget of the Labor Government in May The main purpose of the policy is to raise the threshold at which a surcharge is applied to the income of singles and couples (equal to 1% of their income) if they do not have PHI cover. This is an amendment of previous policy. The effect of the surcharge has been to provide an incentive for individuals and couples with incomes above the threshold to purchase PHI cover. Legislation will be needed for the proposed changes to be implemented. Thus, the effect of the proposed changes will be to provide an incentive for some singles and couples to drop their PHI cover; it has been estimated that this may save singles up to $1000 and couples $1500 per year. The government is the main driver of the policy. Initiators of idea/main actors Government: The government has proposed the policy and has been involved in negotiations with the opposition parties in the Senate about the legislation needed for it to be implemented. Private Sector or Industry: Private health insurance companies are strongly opposed to the policy as it is likely to have a negative effect on their business Opinion Leaders: Australian Nurses Association is a supporter of the policy whilst the AMA is opposed - the doctors' association is traditionally a strong supporter of the private health sector Approach of idea The approach of the idea is described as: amended: Legislation covering the Medicare levy surcharge Stakeholder positions There has been widespread media debate about the policy since the budget was introduced in May In a parliamentary inquiry into the issue various estimates of the effects of the policy have been aired. For example, the PHI companies have claimed that, if the policy is implemented, appoximately 400,000 people will drop their PHI cover, the industry will suffer a fall of 20% in profits which in turn will result in a rise in premiums of 10-11%. The Treasury has estimated that more than 500,000 people may drop their PHI cover while the AMA says it may be 1 million. There is also disagreement about the extent to which PHI premiums will rise; the PHI companies claim the rise will be in the vicinity of 10%, the AMA is claiming they will rise by 5% and the Treasury, while accepting that premiums will rise, is not prepared to name a figure. There is no agreement about the effect the policy will have on utilisation of the public hospital system. PHI companies are using the issue to forecast mergers and company failures as well as steep increases in premiums. The State and Territory governments are using the issue to lobby for large increases in health funding from the Federal government, on the grounds that there will be a rise in the use of public hospitals, which are funded by the States and Territories on the basis of health care agreements negotiated between them and the Federal government. The opposition parties in the Senate are using the issue as an opportunity to flex their muscles and to lobby for either amendments to the proposed policy or support from the government for other issues in return for their support for this policy. Actors and positions Description of actors and their positions Government - 3 -
4 Government very supportive strongly opposed Opposition parties in the Senate very supportive strongly opposed Private Sector or Industry PHI companies very supportive strongly opposed Opinion Leaders Australian Nurses Association very supportive strongly opposed Australian Medical Association very supportive strongly opposed Influences in policy making and legislation To win support in the Senate for the policy, the government will need the support of either the Liberal/National party coalition or a number of senators outside the major parties such as independents or members of the Green or Family First parties. The opposition Liberal/National party coalition is unlikely to support any policy as it was in government when the policy was introduced. The Greens may support it if the government agrees to future indexation of increases in the income threshold, a review of the effect of the policy on PHI companies and the private health sector and if they will guarantee that any savings would be earmarked for the public health system. Some independent senators are lobbying for a decrease in the proposed new income thresholds on the grounds that the ones proposed will encourage too many people to drop their PHI cover, resulting in rises in premiums and increased pressure on the public hospital system. The government has estimated that it will lose approximately $600milion over 4 years due to cuts in taxation revenue as the number of people paying the surcharge declines. But government expenditure will also fall by about $1billion because of the decrease in PHI members receiving the 30% rebate on their premiums. The government has announced that it is prepared to increase the income threshold for singles to $75,000 rather than the $100,000 originally proposed and to keep the threshold for couples at $150,000. As yet, it is not clear if this compromise will be successful as far as having the legislation passed in the Senate. Legislative outcome pending Actors and influence Description of actors and their influence Government Government very strong none Opposition parties in the Senate very strong none Private Sector or Industry PHI companies very strong none Opinion Leaders Australian Nurses Association very strong none Australian Medical Association very strong none Positions and Influences at a glance - 4 -
5 Adoption and implementation If adopted, the proposed changes will be implemented through the taxation system. Monitoring and evaluation It is not clear if the results of the proposed changes will be formally monitored and reviewed, although this may occur if some proposed changes to the legislation are accepted by the government. However, it will be possible to monitor the major outcomes of the policy ie the changes in membership numbers of individual PHI companies, the changes in PHI premiums, any changes to the number of PHI companies in Australia (including mergers and take-overs) and the impact on utilisation of the public health system. PHI: More services to substitute fewer customers The Health Minister has offered to partially compensate PHI companies for the proposed changes by considering easing existing regulatory barriers that prevent the companies from broadening their product range eg being able to offer cover for lifestyle benefits such as gym fees, running shoes, therapeutic music CDs etc. 6. Expected outcome Increase in funding for public health sector The government has estimated that it will lose approximately $600milion in income over 4 years due to cuts in taxation - 5 -
6 revenue as the number of people paying the surcharge declines. But government expenditure will also fall by about $1billion because of the decrease in PHI members receiving the 30% rebate on their premiums. If the policy is introduced, there is no doubt that some people will drop their PHI cover. However, it is not clear how many will do this and what the overall effect will be, although some commentators are predicting not just an exodus of young people immediately but a slowdown in the rate at which young people take up PHI; if these people have been the drivers of the recent increase in PHI membership then this may have a long lasting effect on the PHI industry. However, research has shown that the extent to which people take up and drop PHI depends on their motivation for purchasing PHI and the value of the product to them. Those who do drop their cover will have lower costs but those remaining in the PHI system will face premium rises, as the overall pool of insured will be smaller. However, such premium rises are an annual occurence in Australia - premiums have risen by around 5% per year for the last 3 years, driven by higher claims, in particular higher benefits per day. The reasons that benefits have been increased is a combination of technological advances (more complex and more expensive procedures), higher rates of procedures and higher fees paid to providers. Once again, the extent to which premiums will rise is an empirical question; young healthy people tend to purchase relatively cheap policies with high deductibles and there may be little impact on the premiums of policies which offer higher levels of cover unless these policies are cross-subsidised by revenue from young healthy policy holders. Accelerating mergers on the PHI market While there may be a reduction in the number of PHI companies due to mergers and takeovers, the large number of companies is an unusual feature of the Australian PHI context and may be the result of long-term government financial support as well as the existence of regional companies with relatively small market shares. There is evidence that changes are already taking place in the PHI market, prior to the proposed changes to the surcharge. Thus a shake-up may have occured without any changes to the Medicare levy surcharge. There is no evidence that the change in policy will have an adverse impact on the viability of either the PHI or the private hospital sector overall. Another area of contention is the extent to which the changes will impact on the public health system ie by forcing some people who would have been treated in a private hospital to be treated in a public hospital. For example, Catholic Health Australia has estimated that 247,444 people in NSW and the ACT would drop their PHI cover resulting in an additional 73,400 requiring public hospital procedures in the foreseeable future. The same organisation has forecast that this will translate into an Australia-wide increase of 200,000 procedures in a 12 month period, costing public hospitals an additonal $400m. Extra burden for public hospitals? However, the relationship between PHI cover and utilisation of private and public hospitals is not straightforward. Analysis of utilisation data before and after the last round of PHI reforms (in the late 1990s) indicates that admissions to acute public hospitals rose at the same rate before and after the reforms, while length of stay declined before the reforms and rose after they were introduced. Government spending on public hospitals increased 8% during and 8.9% during after a 42 % increase in PHI coverage. Over 50% of elective surgery is performed in private hospitals; those who are most likely to require this are also those least likely to drop their PHI cover. The young and healthy who are most likely to drop their cover (because they took it out in response to the financial incentives) are also least likely to require a procedure. Therefore, it is not clear that a drop in PHI coverage will have a catastrophic effect on public hospitals, as forecast by some private sector commentators. Slowing the brain-drain from public to private? There is some evidence that the increased government funding provided by the previous Federal government may have resulted in health care professionals moving into the private sector. Thus, there is a possibility that this policy, particularly if it is accompanied by an increase in funding to the public sector, may encourage more professionals to work in the public sector, thus increasing its capacity to provide high quality services. Quality of Health Care Services marginal fundamental - 6 -
7 Level of Equity system less equitable system more equitable Cost Efficiency very low very high As the impact of the proposed change to policy on the utilisaton of health care services, whether in the private or public sectors, is likely to be very small, the proposed change in policy is not likely to have any significant effect on the quality of care, equity or efficiency. However, if the policy is accompanied by an increase in funding for the public health sector, the quality of services provided may rise and equity of access may increase. As there is also evidence that the proportion of costs used for adminstration are higher in PHI companies than in the public insurer Medicare (10% for PHI versus 3% for Medicare), a significant decrease in the use of PHI may also increase efficiency. 7. References Sources of Information Private health insurance- Medicare levy surcharge Franklin M, Ryan S. Rudd forced to tone down Medicare surcharge reform. The Australian 16th September 2008 Shanahan L. Greens stymie Medicare levy bill. The Age, 28th August 2008 Ryan S. Labor bid to offset health fund exodus. The Australian 14th August 2008 Shanahan L. Medicare change to raise private health fees - premiums predicted to surge 10%. The Age, August 13th, 2008 Metherall M. Insurance decline to hit public hospitals. The Sydney Morning Herals, August 4th, 2008 Ryan S. Levey change "will cost health funds a million members". The Australian, July 29th, Yong J, Time to review health insurance policy. The Australian 21st July, Shanhan L. Treasury in dark on effects of levy change. The Age, July 15th, Franklin M. Nurses back PM on health insurance. The Australian, 14th July, 2008 Franklin M. Levy plan to "hurt poorest". The Australian July 14th Franklin M. States to rebel on health changes. The Australian, July 14th, 2008 Davidson K. Private cover means public gain. THe Age, June 12th, 2008 Steketee M. Subsidy-addicted, semi-public system in all but name. The Australian, May 22nd, 2008 Ryan S. States want cash for Medicare change. The Australian May 13th, 2008 Metherall M, Pollard R. Health fund fees to soar "young to lead insurance exodus". The Sydney Morning Herald, May 12th, Savage E. Submission to the Senate Inquiry into Tax Laws Amendment (Medicare Levy Surcharge Thresholds) Bill Buchmeuller T, Fiebig D, Jones G, Savage E. Advantageous selection in private health insurance: the case of Australia. CHERE Working Paper 2008/2, CHERE, Sydney, Ellis R, Savage E. Run for cover now or later? The impact of premiums, threats and deadlines on supplementary - 7 -
8 private health insurance in Australia. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics (accepted February 2008). Fiebig D, Savage E. Viney R. Does the reason for buying health insurance influence behaviour? CHERE Working Paper 2007/1. CHERE, Sydney, Author/s and/or contributors to this survey Marion Haas Suggested citation for this online article Marion Haas. "More changes to private health insurance Australia". Health Policy Monitor, September Available at -
How To Sell Medibank Private
Sale of Medibank Private Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (8)2006 Author(s): Marion Haas Health
More informationHealth & the economic crisis: the Australian case
Health & the economic crisis: the Australian case Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (14) 2009
More informationUniversal Dental Health Scheme
Universal Dental Health Scheme Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (13) 2009 Author(s): Gallego,
More informationAccess to dental care in Australia
Access to dental care in Australia Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (5)2005 Author(s): Marion
More informationPrivate Health Insurance: more products
Private Health Insurance: more products Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (8)2006 Author(s):
More informationMelbourne Institute Policy Briefs Series Policy Brief No. 3/13
Melbourne Institute Policy Briefs Series Policy Brief No. 3/13 Does Reducing Rebates for Private Health Insurance Generate Cost Savings? Terence C. Cheng THE MELBOURNE INSTITUTE IS COMMITTED TO INFORMING
More informationIdea Pilot Policy Paper Legislation Implementation Evaluation Change
Medical Indemnity Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (1)2003 Author(s): Marion Haas Health Policy
More informationTax Laws Amendment (Medicare Levy Surcharge Thresholds) Bill 2008. Contents. Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services BILLS DIGEST
Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information analysis and advice for the Parliament BILLS DIGEST 4 June 2008, no. 121, 2007 08, ISSN 1328-8091 Tax Laws
More informationHealth financing reform idea: health fund
Health financing reform idea: health fund Country: Germany Partner Institute: Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh Survey no: (7)2006 Author(s): Melanie Zimmermann, reviewers: Reinhard Busse, Sophia Schlette
More informationSubmission to the Private Health Insurance
Submission to the Private Health Insurance Consultations 2015-16 The AMA welcomes the opportunity to provide a submission to the Private Health Insurance Consultations 2015-16. The Review will no doubt
More informationPRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE Presentation by Paul Collins to 26 March 2009 Disclaimer: The view expressed in this presentation are the views of the author and may not reflect the views of PHIAC Outline of
More informationfinding the balance between public and private health the example of australia
finding the balance between public and private health the example of australia By Zoe McKenzie, Senior Researcher This note provides an overview of the principal elements of Australia s public health system,
More informationGeneric substitution of prescription drugs
Generic substitution of prescription drugs Country: Finland Partner Institute: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki Survey no: (2)2003 Author(s): Ilmo Keskimäki and Lauri Vuorenkoski
More informationMandatory deductible in basic health insurance
Mandatory deductible in basic health insurance Country: Netherlands Partner Institute: University of Maastricht, Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics (BEOZ) Survey no: (11)2008 Author(s):
More informationROYAL AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE ECONOMICS COMMITTEE JULY 2008
ROYAL AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE ECONOMICS COMMITTEE JULY 2008 1. Overview The level of private health insurance membership (PHI) in Australia has a direct effect on the
More informationRisk equalizing schemes - the next chapter
Risk equalizing schemes - the next chapter Country: Slovenia Partner Institute: Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana Survey no: (7)2006 Author(s): Tit Albreht Health Policy
More informationMunicipal co-payment for health care services
Municipal co-payment for health care services Country: Denmark Partner Institute: University of Southern Denmark, Odense Survey no: (10)2007 Author(s): Ankjær-Jensen, Anni and Terkel Christiansen Health
More informationImplementing work accident and illness insurance
Implementing work accident and illness insurance Country: Estonia Partner Institute: PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies, Tallinn Survey no: (10)2007 Author(s): Agris Koppel, Ain Aaviksoo Health Policy Issues:
More informationSubmission to the Inquiry into the. Tax Laws Amendment. (Medicare Levy Surcharge Thresholds) Bill 2008 AUGUST 2008
Submission to the Inquiry into the Tax Laws Amendment (Medicare Levy Surcharge Thresholds) Bill 2008 AUGUST 2008 Gerardine (Ged) Kearney Federal Secretary Lee Thomas Assistant Federal Secretary Australian
More informationWho benefits from private health insurance in Australia?
THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE Who benefits from private health insurance in Australia? March 2005 Richard Denniss The Federal Government strongly encourages increased reliance on private health insurance to
More informationThe State Of Electronic Health Records: A Strategic Plan For Ails You
Implementing Electronic Health Records: An Update Country: USA Partner Institute: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management Survey no: (10)2007 Author(s):
More informationaustralian nursing federation
australian nursing federation Submission to Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives Bill 2009 and two related Bills; and Health Insurance Amendment (Extended Medicare Safety Net) Bill 2009 July 2009
More informationHow To Increase Hospital Insurance Premium In Nsw
06 August 2009 Mr David Kalisch Commissioner, Hospital Studies Productivity Commission Locked Bag 2, Collins Street East Melbourne Vic 8003 Australian Unity s Submission: Productivity Commission Issues
More informationHealth insurance tax rort
THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE Health insurance tax rort November 2002 This report concludes that private health insurance funds are facilitating and, in some cases, encouraging tax avoidance by providing products
More informationThe Costs of Claytons Health Insurance Products
Journal of Economic and Social Policy Volume 8 Issue 2 Article 5 1-1-2004 The Costs of Claytons Health Insurance Products Clive Hamilton Australian National University, ACT Richard Denniss Australian National
More informationCoalition Senators' Dissenting Report
Summary Coalition Senators' Dissenting Report It is clear from the evidence that the Lifetime Health Cover initiative has been successful in encouraging people to purchase hospital cover earlier in life
More informationPrivate Health Insurance Consultations 2015 2016
Submission to Private Health Insurance Consultations 2015 2016 November 2015 Lee Thomas Federal Secretary Annie Butler Assistant Federal Secretary Australian Nursing & Midwifery Federation PO Box 4239
More informationPrivate Health Insurance Incentives Amendment Bill 2004
Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament BILLS DIGEST 3 December 2004, no. 70, 2004 05, ISSN 1328-8091 Private
More informationThe specific objectives the ADA feels obligated and competent to comment upon are:
14-16 Chandos Street St Leonards NSW 2034 All Correspondence to: PO Box 520 St Leonards NSW 1590 30 January, 2014 Mr John Edge First Assistant Secretary Medibank Sale Taskforce Department of Finance John
More informationHIRMAA SUBMISSION. to the. Review of Australia s future tax system
HIRMAA SUBMISSION to the Review of Australia s future tax system Health Insurance Restricted Membership Association of Australia Level 2, 826 Whitehorse Road, Box Hill, Victoria, 3128 Telephone : 03 9896
More informationRe: Inquiry into the Private Health Insurance Legislation Amendment (Base Premium) Bill 2013
Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committees on Community Affairs PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Email: community.affairs.sen@aph.gov.au Dear Dr Holland Re: Inquiry into the Private Health
More informationChapter 11 SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCING OPTION (4) VOLUNTARY PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE. Voluntary Private Health Insurance as Supplementary Financing
Chapter 11 SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCING OPTION (4) VOLUNTARY PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE Voluntary Private Health Insurance as Supplementary Financing 11.1 Voluntary private health insurance includes both employer
More informationIndependent treatment centers in the Netherlands
Independent treatment centers in the Netherlands Country: Netherlands Partner Institute: University of Maastricht, Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics (BEOZ) Survey no: (11)2008 Author(s):
More informationSubmission to the National Commission of Audit (Health and related expenditure) December 2013
Submission to the National Commission of Audit (Health and related expenditure) December 2013 Introduction Private Healthcare Australia is the industry association representing the 23 leading private health
More informationUHI Explained. Frequently asked questions on the proposed new model of Universal Health Insurance
UHI Explained Frequently asked questions on the proposed new model of Universal Health Insurance Overview of Universal Health Insurance What kind of health system does Ireland currently have? At the moment
More informationElectronic prescriptions and patient records
Electronic prescriptions and patient records Country: Finland Partner Institute: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki Survey no: (9)2007 Author(s): Lauri Vuorenkoski, STAKES Health
More information2014 FEDERAL BUDGET SUMMARY
2014 FEDERAL BUDGET SUMMARY Corner Lime & Cuthbert Streets King Street Wharf Sydney NSW Phone: (02) 9249 7600 email@bellpartners.com www.bellpartners.com CEO Message The words promise and commitment have
More informationTurning Logic and Evidence on it Head: Australia's Subsidy to Private Insurance
Turning Logic and Evidence on it Head: Australia's Subsidy to Private Insurance Jeremiah Hurley Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Department of Economics McMaster University Thank Jamie Daw
More informationAccountable Care Organizations and Health Reform
Accountable Care Organizations and Health Reform Country: USA Partner Institute: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management Survey no: (16)2010 Author(s):
More informationHealth Human Resources & Foreign Medical Graduates
Health Human Resources & Foreign Medical Graduates Country: Canada Partner Institute: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton Survey no: (15) 2010 Author(s): Michel
More informationPrivate Health Insurance (PHI)
Private Health Insurance (PHI) Proposed means testing not consistent with Community Rating 12 July 2011 On 7 July 2011, the Commonwealth government introduced legislation into Parliament to establish a
More informationPre-existing condition coverage post-health reform
Pre-existing condition coverage post-health reform Country: USA Partner Institute: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management Survey no: (16)2010 Author(s):
More informationRestricting supplemental insurance services
Restricting supplemental insurance services Country: Israel Partner Institute: The Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem Survey no: (10)2007 Author(s): Gross, Revital and Shuli Brammli-Greenberg Health
More informationImpact of Private Health Insurance on the Choice of Public versus Private Hospital Services
Impact of Private Health Insurance on the Choice of Public versus Private Hospital Services Preety Srivastava & Xueyan Zhao Centre for Health Economics Monash University 3 June 2008 Background Australian
More informationActuaries Institute submission to the Private Health Insurance Review
7 December 2015 The Hon Sussan Ley MP Minister for Health Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Email: PHIconsultations2015-16@health.gov.au Dear Minister Actuaries Institute submission to the Private Health
More information11 August 2014. Review of Australia s Welfare System CANBERRA ACT 2600. Dear Sir/Madam. Welfare Review Submission
11 August 2014 Review of Australia s Welfare System CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Sir/Madam Welfare Review Submission The Financial Services Council (FSC) represents Australia's retail and wholesale funds management
More information4 May, 2011. Mr Tony Windsor MP Member for New England PO Box 6022 House of Representatives Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600.
4 May, 2011 Mr Tony Windsor MP Member for New England PO Box 6022 House of Representatives Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Mr Windsor I am writing to you regarding the Federal Government s intended
More informationNew health insurance system
New health insurance system Country: Netherlands Partner Institute: Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam Survey no: (4)2004 Author(s): Jos Holland and André den Exter,
More informationRegulation impact statement Unincorporated small business tax discount
Regulation impact statement Unincorporated small business tax discount Contents Background... 1 1. The problem... 1 2. Case for government action/objective of reform... 2 3. Policy options... 3 Option
More informationUpdate on the Integrated Hospital-Community EMR
Update on the Integrated Hospital-Community EMR Country: Israel Partner Institute: The Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem Survey no: (12) 2008 Author(s): Nirel, Nurit and Revital Gross Health Policy
More informationAustralian. Introductionn. History. over 65). people aged. The changes. rises. Single. earners who
18 August 2011 Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association Position paper Private Health Insurance (Rebate and Medicare Levy Surcharge) Introductionn The Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
More informationACHPER NSW. PDHPE HSC Enrichment Day 2009. Core 1
ACHPER NSW PDHPE HSC Enrichment Day 2009 Core 1 Health Priorities in Australia Concept map of syllabus What role do health care facilities & services play in achieving better health for all Australians?
More information2. The stable patient case - in case when the circumstances of their health condition are neither sudden nor urgent (causing emergency).
Criteria to choose patients from waiting lists Country: Poland Partner Institute: Institute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow Survey no: (6)2005 Author(s): Iwona Kowalska
More informationPerformance Payment for Family Physicians
Performance Payment for Family Physicians Country: Estonia Partner Institute: PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies, Tallinn Survey no: (6)2005 Author(s): Ain Aaviksoo Health Policy Issues: Remuneration / Payment
More informationAN EXCISE TAX ON INSURERS OFFERING HIGH-COST PLANS CAN HELP PAY FOR HEALTH REFORM Would Also Help Slow Growth in Health Costs by Paul N.
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org August 7, 2009 AN EXCISE TAX ON INSURERS OFFERING HIGH-COST PLANS CAN HELP PAY FOR HEALTH
More informationHow fair is health spending? The distribution of tax subsidies for health in Australia. Julie Smith
The distribution of tax subsidies for health in Australia Julie Smith Number 43 October 2001 THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE The distribution of tax subsidies for health in Australia Julie Smith Senior Research
More informationInquiry into the out-of-pocket costs in Australian healthcare
Submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Community Affairs - References Committee Inquiry into the out-of-pocket costs in Australian healthcare May 2014 Out-of-pocket costs in Australian healthcare
More informationPublic insurance for dental care for chidren
Public insurance for dental care for chidren Country: Israel Partner Institute: The Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem Survey no: (16)2010 Author(s): Nir Kaidar, Tuvia Horev and Bruce Rosen Health
More informationRebate Indexation Increases Public Health Sector Costs
tht 11 th June 2013 Rebate Indexation Increases Public Health Sector Costs Government legislation to index the Private Health Insurance Rebate to the CPI will result in a decline in membership, higher
More informationAn economic assessment. of the Private Health Insurance system. Prepared by. Econtech Pty Ltd. September 2008 ACHR
An economic assessment of the Private Health Insurance system Prepared by Econtech Pty Ltd September 2008 ACHR AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR HEALTH RESEARCH AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR HEALTH RESEARCH LTD ABN 87 116
More informationMr John Hawkins Secretary Senate Economics Committee Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600. Dear Mr Hawkins
Mr John Hawkins Secretary Senate Economics Committee Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Mr Hawkins On behalf of the Australian Private Hospitals Association (APHA), I attach a submission to the Senate
More informationTax expenditures and public health financing in Australia. Julie Smith
Tax expenditures and public health financing in Australia Julie Smith Number 33 September 2000 2 THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE Tax expenditures and public health financing in Australia Julie Smith Acknowledgements
More informationThe facts. Private health insurance.
The facts. Private health insurance. Fact. The rebate on private health insurance reduces pressure on public health spending. Private healthcare is funded through a combination of private health insurance
More informationCOMPETITION IN THE AUSTRALIAN PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE MARKET
PHIAC Discussion Paper: COMPETITION IN THE AUSTRALIAN PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE MARKET Submission by TUH - January 2013 General comments TUH believes that competition is generally good for consumers and
More informationPrivate health insurance premium increases an overview
Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament BACKGROUND NOTE www.aph.gov.au/library Private health insurance premium
More informationElectricity network services. Long-term trends in prices and costs
Electricity network services Long-term trends in prices and costs Contents Executive summary 3 Background 4 Trends in network prices and service 6 Trends in underlying network costs 11 Executive summary
More informationCORPORATE NEWSLETTER
CORPORATE NEWSLETTER Summer 2014 Page 2 Corporate Newsletter - Summer 2014 CORPORATE NEWSLETTER - SUMMER 2014 Dear Reader, Welcome to our quarterly newsletter which will provide updates and reminders of
More informationHow To Improve Health Care In California
The Expert Patient Programme in Catalonia Country: Spain Partner Institute: University of Barcelona Survey no: (16)2010 Author(s): María González Ortega Health Policy Issues: System Organisation/ Integration
More informationProgram of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly
Program of AllInclusive Care for the Elderly Country: USA Partner Institute: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management Survey no: (13) 2009 Author(s):
More informationAustralian workers earning over $80,000 set to feel debt tax pain
NEWS Australian workers earning over $80,000 set to feel debt tax pain TERRY MCCRANN, LIAM QUINN AND AAP HERALD SUN APRIL 29, 2014 3:51PM Play video Terry McCrann explains Tony Abbott's deficit level facing
More informationEXPLANATORY STATEMENT. Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Health and Ageing. Private Health Insurance Act 2007
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Health and Ageing Private Health Insurance Act 2007 Private Health Insurance (Complying Product) Rules 2007 Section 333-20 of the Private
More informationHealth reform - one year after implementation
Health reform one year after implementation Country: Netherlands Survey no: (9)2007 Reported by: University of Maastricht, Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics (BEOZ) Health Policy Issues:
More informationSUBMISSION Submission to the Federal Government s Private Health Insurance Review
SUBMISSION Submission to the Federal Government s Private Health Insurance Review December 2015 National Secretariat Level 2, 15 National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 PO Box 7036, Canberra Business Centre
More informationECONOMICS FOR HEALTH POLICY
ECONOMICS FOR HEALTH POLICY HEALTH INSURANCE SOME BASIC CONCEPTS IN HEALTH INSURANCE 1 THE PRINCIPLE OF INSURANCE IN ALL ITS SIMPLICITY... The principle of insurance is familiar: Suppose that, out of a
More informationRecycling Unused Cancer Drugs
Recycling Unused Cancer Drugs Country: USA Partner Institute: Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University Survey no: (13) 2009 Author(s): Elena
More information2014 Federal Budget Analysis
For adviser use only. Not for public distribution. 2014 Federal Budget Analysis In one of the more highly anticipated Federal Budgets, the Government announced major changes that should be discussed with
More informationRisk sharing in the Australian private health insurance market
A Risk sharing in the Australian private health insurance market 04 Research Paper 4 June 2015 1 About PHIAC The Private Health Insurance Administration Council (PHIAC) is an independent statutory authority
More informationUsing cheap private health insurance to avoid the Medicare Levy Surcharge What is the cost to taxpayers?
Using cheap private health insurance to avoid the Medicare Levy Surcharge What is the cost to taxpayers? Research Paper No. 46 July 2007 Andrew Macintosh 1 Summary The Medicare Levy Surcharge (MLS) aims
More informationIncrease of the Income Tax Thresholds for the Medicare levy Surcharge
Department of Health and Ageing Increase of the Income Tax Thresholds for the Medicare levy Surcharge September 2011 Table of contents: PURPOSE OF THE POST-IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...
More informationNew guidelines on aesthetic treatment
New guidelines on aesthetic treatment Country: Singapore Partner Institute: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, National University of Singapore Survey no: (12) 2008 Author(s): Lim Meng Kin Health
More informationAN EXAMINATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE FAMILY TAX INITIATIVE. Gillian Beer
AN EXAMINATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE FAMILY TAX INITIATIVE Gillian Beer Policy Papers No. 3 September 1996 National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling Faculty of Management University of Canberra
More informationElectronic medical records
Electronic medical records Country: France Partner Institute: Institut de Recherche et Documentation en Economie de la Santé (IRDES), Paris Survey no: (8)2006 Author(s): Chantal Cases, Philippe Le Fur
More informationLevy Consultation 2010/11. Accident Compensation Corporation. Work Levy Rates for Employers and Self-Employed People
Levy Consultation 2010/11 Accident Compensation Corporation Work Levy Rates for Employers and Self-Employed People Your chance to have your say on what you pay Deadline for Submissions 5.00 pm, 10 November
More informationRURAL DOCTORS ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA. Submission to the Private Health Insurance Consultation
RURAL DOCTORS ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA Submission to the Private Health Insurance Consultation Via email: PHI Consultations 2015-16 Contact for RDAA: Jenny Johnson Chief Executive Officer Email: ceo@rdaa.com.au
More informationFIRST REVIEW OF THE COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY
Submission No 12 FIRST REVIEW OF THE COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY INSURANCE SCHEME Organisation: Date received: 20 May 2016 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons NSW REVIEW OF THE COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY INSURANCE
More informationActuaries Institute Submission
29 May 2015 Tax White Paper Task Force The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 Email: bettertax@treasury.gov.au Dear Sir/Madam Actuaries Institute Submission The Actuaries Institute welcomes the
More informationAustralian Health Insurance Association
COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE Australian Health Insurance Association Economic Impact Assessment of the Proposed Reforms to Private Health Insurance Final Report 28 April 2011 COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE About
More informationPolicy to Deliver Lower Prices by Scrapping the Carbon Tax
1 olicy to Deliver Lower Prices by Scrapping the Carbon Tax September 2013 2 Key Points The Coalition will abolish the carbon tax. We will create a special unit within the Australian Competition and Consumer
More informationUS Health Reform - What s happened, and does it matter to Australian health insurers?
US Health Reform - What s happened, and does it matter to Australian health insurers? The Australian media have provided a great deal of coverage of US health reforms without really explaining what is
More informationThe Denia Project: Concession for integrated HC
The Denia Project: Concession for integrated HC Country: Spain Partner Institute: Centre de Recerca en Economia i Salut (CRES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Survey no: (6)2005 Author(s): Dr. Fidel
More informationProductivity Commission inquiry into a long term disability care and support scheme. Avant Mutual Group submission
Productivity Commission inquiry into a long term disability care and support scheme Background Avant Mutual Group submission Avant Mutual Group Limited (Avant) is Australia's largest medical defence organisation
More informationContemporary Issues in Private Health Insurance. Andrew Gale Ben Ooi David Watson
Contemporary Issues in Private Health Insurance Andrew Gale Ben Ooi David Watson 1 Membership trends, financial results & price increases Reports & inquiries into health financing and costs Cost pressures
More informationCommunity Rating More Trouble Than Its Worth?
Community Rating More Trouble Than Its Worth? Prepared by Jamie Reid, Ashish Ahluwalia and Sonia Tripolitano Presented to the Actuaries Institute Actuaries Summit 20-21 May 2013 Sydney This paper has been
More informationA Health Insurance Exchange in Maryland
A Health Insurance Exchange in Maryland A Presentation before the Joint Committee on Health Care Delivery and Financing June 14, 2007 Rex Cowdry, M.D. Executive Director MHCC Study MHCC has been asked
More informationHealth Commission Final Report - Major Changes for Private Health Insurers
Health Commission Final Report - Major Changes for Private Health Insurers The National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHHRC) recently produced its final report. While much of the content of the
More informationFederal Budget 2014. What the Federal Budget means Health sector
Federal Budget 2014 What the Federal Budget means Health sector About NAB Health NAB Health s market leading team of specialist bankers work exclusively with businesses and professionals in the healthcare
More informationProduct Rationalisation Managed Investment Schemes and Life Insurance Products
Product Rationalisation of Managed Investment Schemes and Life Insurance Products Proposals Paper Commonwealth of Australia 2009 ISBN 978-0-642-74544-6 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted
More information