Secure Futures, LLC. Center for Geospatial Information Technology

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Secure Futures, LLC. Center for Geospatial Information Technology"

Transcription

1 Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Request for Information Response Solar Energy Development submitted by Secure Futures, LLC in collaboration with the Center for Geospatial Information Technology March 13, 2015 Secure Futures, LLC 11 E. Beverley Street, Suite 19, Staunton, VA (877) Center for Geospatial Information Technology 2060 Torgersen Hall, Virginia Tech, Backsburg, VA (540) Page 290

2 General 1. What relevant qualifications and experience does the respondent have in developing and delivering large (>100kW) solar energy projects? Secure Futures has established itself as the market leader in Virginia for third-party owned and financed solar: First company to deploy commercial scale solar in Virginia, in 2010, under a PPA. First company to sign a PPA under Dominion Power s 2013 legislation for distributed renewable generation. Pioneered the use of the Customer Self-Generation Agreement within the Commonwealth. Won the 2014 Innovation Award from the Maryland, DC, and Virginia Solar Energy Industry Association for achievement in advanced solar project financing. Experience working with Investor Owned Utilities, Electric Cooperatives and Non- Jurisdictional Utilities to seamlessly apply for grid interconnection agreements. Building brand status/pr through public awareness and education programs coordinated with our customers and communities. Secure Futures, LLC has experience with a number of third-party financing arrangements, including Power Purchase Agreements (PPA), Secure Futures proprietary and confidential Solar Customers Self-Generation Agreements (CSGA ) and Lease Agreements. In all, Secure Futures currently owns and operates over 610 kilowatts of solar in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and has signed contracts or letters of intent for up to an additional 2 MW to be constructed in The following projects were developed, financed, installed, owned and operated by Secure Futures: Customer Size Project Location Utility Territory Eastern Mennonite University 104 kw Harrisonburg, VA Harrisonburg Electric Commission Form of Contract PPA Washington and Lee University 444 kw Lexington, VA Dominion Virginia Power Lease Park View Mennonite Church Creation Care 20 kw Harrisonburg, VA Harrisonburg Electric Commission CSGA United Church of Christ 4 kw Chesterfield, VA Dominion Virginia Power CSGA Harrisonburg Redevelopment & Housing Authority 35 kw Harrisonburg, VA Harrisonburg Electric Commission CSGA SECURE FUTURES 2 Page 291

3 University of Richmond 204 kw to be installed 2015 Richmond, VA Dominion Virginia Power PPA Eastern Mennonite University 510 kw to be installed 2015 Harrisonburg, VA Harrisonburg Electric Commission CSGA Insurance Institute of Highway Safety 255 kw to be installed 2015 Greene County, VA Rappahannock Electric Cooperative CSGA The Center for Geospatial Information Technology ( CGIT ) at Virginia Tech collaborated with Secure Futures on this RFI to address spatial data and decision support strategies for site assessment related to solar energy projects. CGIT has experience working with the Town of Blacksburg on the assessment of properties for solar project installations and participated in the Virginia Distributed Solar Generation and Net Metering Stakeholder Group, as convened and facilitated by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy. 2. What specific experience does the respondent have in third-party financing of solar energy projects completed or underway on publicly-owned property, especially ROW property? Please provide contact information for the public agencies for which these projects were developed. In addition to the Harrisonburg Housing Authority project we completed, we are currently working with four other public agencies on solar projects. We were selected by the Albemarle County Public Schools (ACPS) and another public entity as the top bidder in each of their competitive RFP processes and contract negotiations are currently underway with each of those customers. In addition, the City of Lexington Public Schools is in discussions with Secure Futures about a potential solar project. We anticipate financing to close on these projects by the end of Q CGIT has experience with multiple statewide datasets for inventory and assessment of public properties including ROWs through current and past projects for statewide broadband mapping and assessment (inventory and analysis of ROWs from local governments, VDOT and DGS), Virginia s Statewide Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment coordinated through Virginia Department of Emergency Management for an all hazards analysis using Virginia Agency Property Assessment System (VAPS), and with Virginia Department of Transportation through CGIT s support of the Department of Motor Vehicles crash record mapping and analysis. Contact information for Secure Futures references is provided below: Reference Contact Information SECURE FUTURES 3 Page 292

4 Harrisonburg Redevelopment & Housing Authority Washington & Lee University Eastern Mennonite University Park View Mennonite Church Department of Mines, Minerals & Energy City National Bank Michael Wong, Executive Director (540) Ken Ruscio, President (540) Steve McAllister, Vice President for Finance/Treasurer (540) Scott Beebe, Director of Energy Initiatives (540) Loren Swartzendruber, President (540) Daryl Bert, Vice President for Finance (540) Eldon Kurtz, Physical Plant Director (540) Jim Leaman, PVMC Creation Care Committee (540) Ken Jurman, Division of Energy - Solar & Wind Programs ken.jurman@dmme.virginia.gov (804) Paul Martin, Vice President paul.martin@bankatcity.com (540) Are there any particular concerns with any of the information that has been provided in this RFI? Please explain those concerns and provide proposed solutions or mitigations to address those concerns. In order to determine which state-owned facilities would make good host locations for rooftop solar projects we would require additional information: Electricity rate information for the facility Usage data for the facilities main electrical meters including total usage (kwh) and demand profile (kw) on a daily and annual cycle Whether the facility has gas or electric heat Roof type and year installed We understand that some of the relevant data regarding state managed properties is already housed in the VAPS (Virginia Agency Property Assessment System database. If access were granted for solar energy assessment, CGIT would be able to analyze the State-owned property inventory using Secure Futures parameters to determine facilities that would be appropriate for rooftop solar. SECURE FUTURES 4 Page 293

5 4. Do you foresee state or federal legislative issues that would hinder the feasibility of the Project? If so, then what are they and how could they be resolved? Expiration of the federal business energy investment tax credit at the end of 2016 will significantly reduce the economic value associated with a solar project perhaps making it economically unviable. This issue can be resolved by ensuring the projects are contracted by Q so that equipment can be ordered and installed by the end of 2016 (we expect there will be a high demand for equipment in 2016 so lead times for equipment will likely be longer than usual). Project Structure and Development Delivery Method 5. What delivery methods are available for this Project? What are the advantages of each delivery method? What are the disadvantages of each delivery method? Which delivery method does the respondent prefer and why? We see two main avenues for the development of solar projects on State-owned land: Method A: Developer installs solar project on State-owned property (rooftop or ground mount) and the State consumes the solar-generated electricity to offset its purchase of electricity from the grid. The developer sells the State solar services or solar-generated electricity under a Customer Self-Generation Agreement (CSGA TM ) or a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) depending on utility territory. One significant advantage of Method A is the ability of the State to purchase solar services through a Cooperative Purchasing Agreement (CPA) following on another public RFP issued on behalf of other public bodies in Virginia pursuant to Virginia Code Section This procurement process would significantly expedite procurement time and decrease total project cost. Secure Futures is in the process of negotiating contracts with multiple public entities that will be subject to Cooperative Purchasing upon contract execution (expected April 2015). Method B: Developer installs solar project on State-owned property (likely ground mount sites, over 1 MW) and sells the solar-generated electricity to the utility company. The State would receive a lease payment from the developer in exchange for use of the land for the project. The State will likely see a higher economic return with Method A. But the amount of total installed solar could be larger with Method B. Secure Futures prefers Method A as it yields higher economic benefits for the customer, but we are open to working with the State on either option. The carport type projects described in the High-Level Screening Report could work with either Method A or B but the additional cost of the carport structures is significant compared the SECURE FUTURES 5 Page 294

6 rooftop or ground mount type installations so the economic benefits to the State would be reduced. 6. What are the key success factors facilitating and barriers impeding success that would make delivering a solar energy project more or less likely in Virginia? The following issues act as barriers to the successful delivery of solar in Virginia: Currently third-party PPAs are permitted only in Dominion territory under a pilot program. Secure Futures has developed the proprietary and confidential CSGA agreement that can and has been deployed by Secure Futures for areas of Virginia outside of Dominion territory to provide third-party ownership option for solar. But project financing would be easier if PPAs could be used throughout the State since this is a more standard agreement with which investors are already familiar. Low electricity prices in the State make it harder for solar to be economically competitive. Without any state tax incentives the Virginia solar market is at a disadvantage compared to neighboring states. A Virginia State Investment Tax Credit for Renewable Energy Generating Equipment could be developed to be revenue neutral for the State (decrease in revenues from State corporate income tax offset by increased revenues from personal income tax following expanded solar industry within the state and growth of in-state solar workforce). Since there is no VA RPS requirement, utilities are less motivated to support the growth of in-state solar. The instability of the REC market means there is potential economic value that gets significantly discounted by investors; this erodes project economics. Virginia does not require utilities to allow virtual net metering (neither for facilities of a single owner, nor for facilities adjacent to each other). Virtual net metering would enable development of larger, more economical projects that could serve multiple facilities. The Virginia Small Business Finance Authority provides loan guarantees for up to $500,000. It would help developers obtain lower cost project financing if this loan guarantee cap were increased to $2,000, What are the advantages and disadvantages of one large singular site versus multiple sites packaged together into one project? Focusing on larger projects will improve the economics for the State through improved economies of scale. The advantages of multiple sites (rather than one large site) is that you are likely to run into fewer development approval issues. Once you ve identified smaller sites that are well-suited to solar, you are less likely to run into issues related to viewshed concerns, permitting requirements, environmental reviews, etc. It is also more likely that a smaller site will SECURE FUTURES 6 Page 295

7 be able to be sited adjacent to a State facility in which case the electricity generated by the project could directly offset the State s usage of grid electricity (see description of Method A above). 8. If multiple sites were packaged together, then what are the possible packaging options? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each option? Which option does your firm prefer? Some possible packaging options may include: Total project capacity as single award Bidding blocks (e.g., with each respondent proposing a minimum of 1MW) Allow bidders to cherry pick the list Quote each facility/site separately Group into blocks by system types and sizes, by building types & sizes, by financing mechanism, by geography, etc. Include a minimum system size (e.g., 100 kw or 250kW) We suggest the following options for packaging projects: 1. Use Cooperative Procurement for a subset of sites; this could be a pre-determined capacity goal (e.g. 20 MW) with developer to select feasible sites that will provide the State with maximum financial benefits. In addition to 1, Or 2. Issue an RFQ to select preferred bidders based on proposed development approach, contractual approach, indicative pricing, experience, qualifications, and recommendations. Following selection of preferred bidders, the State can apportion potential sites between the preferred bidders. Sites could be apportioned by geography, type of site, or otherwise. Then the State could work with each of the selected bidders to finalize project scopes (location(s) and size(s)) and allow selected bidders to provide project specific pricing based on preliminary engineering. Then the State could move forward to finalize contracts for any final offers that meet the State s economic and capacity goals for solar projects. 3. Issue an RFP that is specific to a small number of sites from the State s property inventory list (such as one property that has potential as a groundmount site and one property that has potential for a rooftop project). Once winning bidders are selected through the RFP, the State can apportion all potential sites between the selected bidders (by geography, type of site, etc.). Then the State can work with the winning bidders to define each bidder s total project scope as needed to meet the State s goals. Regardless of packaging method used, we suggest the following additional characteristics be weighed in the evaluation of bids: Preference for companies headquartered in Virginia Preference for companies with employees based in Virginia SECURE FUTURES 7 Page 296

8 Preference for SWaM companies Consider selecting multiple bidders to work with on multiple projects Specify bidders use Tier 1 equipment to ensure projects are financeable and will have highest long-term production Project Site 9. Based upon the information provided in this RFI, what type of site defined by location, size and other relevant characteristics presents the best opportunity for placement of a solar energy project in Virginia and why? For Method A, the preferred facility site would have the following characteristics: Summer daytime peak demand (kw). Utility tariff that has a high demand charge and/or a demand ratchet. Sufficient facility annual electricity usage (kwh) to justify a 100 kw project (preferably 300 kw). If rooftop solar, at least 40,000 square feet available space on a flat ballasted or membrane roof that is less than 5 years old or a metal, standing seam roof that is less than 20 years old. If ground mount solar, a minimum 2 acre site within 500 yards of the facility, with flat terrain and limited shading. For Method B, the preferred site would be land with the following characteristics: Minimum of 25 acres (ideally 100 acres) available land with flat terrain and limited shading. Easy access to interconnection with a three-phase power line. Within the territory of a utility that is interested in procuring solar-generated electricity under a PPA. 10. What type of site offers the best opportunity for replication on other sites in Virginia? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this type of site? For Method A, replication will be enabled by setting specific criteria for the projects (size threshold, minimum operating savings, regional goals, etc.) that can be used by developer to narrow down list of potential locations quickly. For Method B, the best approach to replication would be to find utility(ies) that are interested in purchasing solar through PPAs and to work with them to identify their preferred sites so that SECURE FUTURES 8 Page 297

9 multiple projects can be developed that would have the same utility offtaker (known pricing and contract terms for multiple projects will lead to development efficiencies). 11. How should sites be pre-qualified for bid without the time and expense of detailed engineering at each site? What site assessment tools or qualifiers should be utilized? Because there are such a large number of potential State properties to consider, the process of pre-qualifying sites should be part of the developers scope following selection of the preferred vendors (as selected under process described in response to Question #6 above). Secure Futures proposes to work with CGIT to analyze the State properties in order to prequalify sites for solar development. Secure Futures would use the following data in its prequalification process depending on the type of solar development (Method A or B): For Method A: o o o Minimum annual kwh used Minimum actual peak demand (kw) Maximum actual peak demand (kw) o Minimum annual utility bill ($) o o o o Tariff type Available roof square footage General description of building type and usage hours (office building, 24 hours operation center, warehouse space, whether climate-controlled or not) Heat source at building elec. or other For Method B: o o o o o o o Minimum acreage Gradient Ground cover Development restrictions (wetlands, protected areas, etc.) Soil type Distance to three-phase power Utility territory SECURE FUTURES 9 Page 298

10 Working with CGIT and using the best available data sets and analysis we believe we can offer the State an efficient, stream-lined sorting of preferred solar locations for both rooftop and ground-mounted systems on State-owned properties. In 2014, a new statewide digital terrain model (DTM) and digital surface model (DSM) were made available through the statewide broadband mapping efforts for use in radio frequency propagation modeling. These high resolution elevation datasets, totaling over 19 terabytes of information, provide a sound basis for solar radiation modeling, site assessment and related analyses as outlined in the presentation by Peter Sforza at Virginia Distributed Solar Generation and Net Metering Stakeholder Group convened by DMME and DCR. The presentation highlights potential science based strategies for solar energy in Virginia, including relevant datasets for representation and analysis, and relevant statewide site assessment tools that have been developed for broadband planning and deployment ( agricultural site assessment ( The presentation can be accessed from the DDME website at What information would a private developer require in order to facilitate project development? Identification of tariff rates for various State facilities. Description of building type for different listed real estate holdings. Actual utility bills (12 months) for facilities (including rate type, kwh, kw and breakdown of various charges). Following review of the above data for the pre-qualified sites, we would propose site visits for those sites identified as having the highest potential for solar development in addition to review of 12-months of electric bills for any facilities being considered under Method A. Commercial and Financial Structure 13. Based upon the delivery methods identified above, who would own the assets, equipment and capital plant in each delivery method? What are the essential terms of the contract for these delivery methods, including the optimal concession period? Method A: Agreements have a 20-year term with an early purchase option in year 7 Assets and equipment are owned by developer (unless and until purchased by the State under early purchase option or at end of contract term) Developer sells solar services or electricity to State depending on contract type (PPA or CSGA) Customer enjoys electricity (kwh) and demand (kw) savings, at below grid-rate. SECURE FUTURES 10 Page 299

11 Method B: 20-year lease term with developer option to extend for 15 years Assets and equipment are owned by developer State receives lease payments in exchange for allowing developer to install and operate a solar project on State property Developer sells electricity to the utility company at a wholesale rate 14. What financing structure is the most feasible and would provide the best value for Virginia? Both Methods will provide the State net benefits. The best value will be determined on a project by project basis (some projects developed using Method A will provide the State with more value than some projects under Method B, and vice versa). 15. Do you anticipate public or utility (other than adopted tariffs) funding or incentives being available for the Project? If so, then what would be the anticipated source of these funds or incentives and how do they add value to the Project? USDA REAP grant funds are currently available to support renewable energy projects located in rural areas. These funds would help to offset developer s cost to construct the project(s), thereby increasing the potential economic benefits for the State. If the project(s) are installed prior to the end of 2016 they would qualify for the Federal renewable energy tax credit and accelerated depreciation. These benefits would accrue to the project owner rather than to the State directly, but they would have a significant impact in improving the overall project economics for the State. 16. Is a solar energy project installation and operation possible without a public subsidy, and if not, what specific subsidies would be required, from whom and why? At this time, it is unlikely that a project could be economically viable without one or both of the benefits described in the response to Question #15, most particularly, placing the project in service prior to December Given the anticipated crush of demand for solar panels and labor nationwide to meet this deadline in 2016, and in order to avoid the expected spike in prices for equipment, the State would need to execute contracts not later than December 2015, to allow another one to two months to secure financing. Assuming a critical path of at least 6 months from RFQ to contract, we suggest issuing RFQ s or awards under Cooperative Purchase Agreement not later than June, SECURE FUTURES 11 Page 300

12 17. What threshold financial arrangements would be necessary or other critical factors resolved to successfully complete the Project? Please outline in order of relative importance. The following arrangements are critical to successful completion of the Project: Contractual commitment from the State including agreement on pricing, terms and scope of project(s) Project financing (to be obtained by developer) For Method B, commitment from utility company on PPA terms (to be obtained by developer) Project Schedule and Solicitation Schedule 18. What major steps are needed from Notice of Award for the Project to full operation of the Project? What are the approximate elapsed times associated with these identified steps? What are the key decision points in the process (including go/no go decisions) and why? For any portion of the Project which the State elects to procure under Cooperative Purchasing (see response #8 above), we anticipate the following timeline: Elapsed Time Activity Between Activities - Notice of Award 1 day State provides developer with number of kws to be developed under Cooperative Purchasing contract 1 week Execute a Non-Binding Letter of Intent which will stipulate the following: the parties intend to enter into a CSGA or PPA (as appropriate) for approximately x kws of solar projects, Secure Futures agrees to identify preferred sites and indicative pricing for x kws of solar projects, Secure Futures agrees to complete site identification within 1-2 months (depends on quantity of kws desired) The State will make a nominal down payment in exchange for Secure Futures completion of the site identification process Execute Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement 1-2 months Secure Futures provides State with list of proposed project sites, sizes, and pricing 1 week The State reviews proposal and elects which (if any) project(s) it wants to move forward with; Secure Futures provides the State with definitive contract for review based on the Cooperative Purchasing requirements SECURE FUTURES 12 Page 301

13 1 day Secure Futures initiates project financing discussions with investors and lenders 2 weeks Secure Futures completes preliminary engineering, updates pricing offer as needed The State reviews definitive contract 3 days Parties finalize and execute contract During the following 3 to 6 months Secure Futures closes project financing, orders long-lead equipment (modules and inverters), selects an EPC contractor, constructs the project, commissions the project For a total of 5-9 months from notice of award to project completion. Preferred timeline would be to issue RFQ or award contracts under Cooperative Purchase Agreement not later than June 2015, as noted above. For projects not procured under Cooperative Purchasing, we would anticipate additional time for RFQ or RFP process (2 months) and negotiation of definitive agreements (1 month) for a total duration of 8-12 months from notice of award to project completion. Given the upcoming expiration of the Investment Tax Credit we anticipate there will be a significant increase in demand for the purchase of solar modules in Q3 and Q that could cause significant delays in receiving equipment. In order to meet the end of 2016 deadline for the ITC we believe equipment orders should be placed by Q which means the State would need to have made contractual commitments prior to Q in order for developers to order equipment. 19. What are the critical path items for the procurement for this Project and why? Make contractual commitments by Q so that developer(s) are able to a) secure financing, and b) execute contracts for Engineering, Procurement, and Engineering (EPC), to include order solar modules and inverters so that projects can be placed in service prior to December 2016, in time for ITC deadline. 20. The currently available federal incentives require an expedited time frame due to expiration December 31, Does this constraint pose a threat to utilizing these incentives for the Project? Yes. Solicitation 21. Looking ahead, would the respondent be interested in submitting a committed proposal for the development of the Project? Are there any particular concerns that may prevent the respondent from engaging in the project development? How might those concerns be resolved? SECURE FUTURES 13 Page 302

14 Yes, Secure Futures would submit a proposal. Our only concern is with regard to type of solicitation issued by the State. If firm price offers are required on a large number of project sites in order to participate in the solicitation that would cause a large burden on the developers to risk the financial capital and time to develop a firm price without any certainty regarding a contract award. We would prefer the State select developers to work with (either through RFQ, Cooperative Purchase Agreement, or RFP bid on a single site as described in response #8) and then work with each selected developer to have them identify preferred project sites, project sizes and pricing. If the State wants to work with multiple developers they could split the possible sites geographically and let selected developers each have a region to work within; and/or the State could separate by type of contracting method (Method A or B). 22. What are the key elements of a RFQ for a solar energy project? Please provide references to other RFQs that have effectively elicited innovative proposals for solar energy projects on publicly-owned property and resulted in successfully completed projects. Secure Futures has a template RFQ that is can make available to the State for review. The Harrisonburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority ( HRHA ) procured a solar project through an RFQ issued March 7, Following an RFQ response from Secure Futures, HRHA proceeded to enter into a CSGA with Secure Futures. Secure Futures installed a 35 kw project on the HRHA rooftop in Through this project, HRHA has been able to reduce its purchase of electricity from the grid and reduce its overall electricity costs. 23. What is the minimum amount of time that your firm requires for developing and submitting a Statement of Qualifications ( SOQ ) for the Project after issuance of a potential RFQ? 1 week 24. What are the key elements of a RFP for a solar energy project? Please provide references to other RFPs that have effectively elicited innovative proposals for solar energy projects on publicly-owned property and resulted in successfully completed projects Need sufficient site information to develop pricing and a reasonable scope that would not require bidders to provide firm pricing on a large number of sites in order to participate in the RFP. Secure Futures is more than happy to contract for a large number of sites if selected as the preferred vendor, but producing firm price offers for many sites is very labor intensive and costly to the company and is hard to justify this time and expense without any indication of commitment from the customer first. SECURE FUTURES 14 Page 303

15 Albemarle County Public Schools issued an RFP July 24, 2014 that has effectively elicited proposals for publicly-owned property. They have executed an LOI with Secure Futures for 1.2MW of solar projects to be installed at 9 school locations. This RFP offers an effective model for other public RFP s, including the equipment specifications for Tier 1 equipment. Tier 1 solar equipment represents bankable equipment. 25. What is the minimum amount of time required by the respondent for developing and submitting a committed detailed proposal for the Project after issuance of a potential RFP? 3 weeks or longer, depending on the scope of the RFP. Additional Considerations 26. Please provide any comments on other creative project scope ideas, procurement options, technical considerations, etc. that VAP3 should take into account. Included above. 27. What are the top risks for successful delivery of this Project and why? What potential impact could the identified risks have? What potential mitigation strategies could be employed to decrease the identified risks? The main risk is that delays in developer selection, project scoping, and contract negotiation will delay procurement of PV modules and inverters too late in 2016 so that the project(s) are not able to qualify for the Federal Investment Tax Credit by the time they are constructed and brought online. 28. In the respondent s experience, what type of public benefit and economic development could a large solar energy project (>100kW) foster in terms of new businesses and job creation If the State specifies the use of Virginia developers and EPC firms there will be a direct economic benefit to the State from the development of projects of any size. Secure Futures is a SWaM-certified, Virginia business. We are working with CGIT (at Virginia Tech) and we partner with a team of Virginia-based EPC companies to complete project procurement and construction. SECURE FUTURES 15 Page 304

16 29. What challenges related to communication with local officials, communities and business does the respondent foresee and what strategies are suggested to be employed to maintain open and transparent relationships? We have not run into communication issues with our previous projects. We encourage our project partners to consider selecting a local, in-state developer who will use equipment manufactured by U.S. companies and who will engage a local, in-state BOP contractor. By meeting these guidelines the projects typically receive robust community support; especially if our partners get the story out with regard to the operational cost-savings and green attributes that the project will generate. We maintain contact with local officials involved in the project to ensure everyone understands status and schedule. The projects are not typically impactful to the communities so the main point of communication is announcement of the project upon contract award, contract execution, start of construction, and/or ribbon cutting. Typically these announcements have garnered strong, positive community response towards the institution involved in the project. 30. Other than the answers already provided, what information would help the respondent make the business decision to engage in the development of the Project? Other than what is covered above, we would expect the State to provide a streamlined procurement process, with a single Point of Contact (POC) who could facilitate access to facilities, help with any permitting issues, and serve as a champion for the project. SECURE FUTURES 16 Page 305

17 3/4/15 Alexandra Lauzon VA Office of Public Private Partnerships 600 E. Main St., Suite 2120 Richmond, VA Dear Alexandra, Sigora Solar is excited to submit the following information in response to the Request for Information issued by the Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships in coordination with the Virginia Department of Mines Minerals and Energy. Please contact us with any questions you may have about the information provided. We are more than happy to clarify any questions the organization may have. We have responded to the RFI in the order the questions were posed: General 1. What relevant qualifications and experience does the respondent have in developing and delivering large (>100kW) solar energy projects. Sigora Solar has not developed any projects greater than 100kW. With that said, Sigora Solar has proven itself as a leader in community scale distributed generation projects as selected installers in both the Solarize Charlottesville and Solarize Harrisonburg Program, which resulted in more than 650kW of residential and small commercial installations scheduled in a short period of time (less than one year). Sigora s largest single project in Virginia is the 64.9kW solar installation on the CFA Institute in Charlottesville, VA. Sigora s largest PV project is the in-progress 96.46kW Van Ness East rooftop system located in D.C. This project is being developed by Nextility and designed and installed by Sigora Solar. Nextility is a third party solar energy development company working with investors and design/installation companies to provide no-upfront cost PPA arrangements for solar PV and thermal projects. Page 306

18 Sigora Solar is also the developer of Virginia s largest rooftop solar thermal system on the state-owned Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Facility, Duffield County. 2. What specific experiences does the respondent have in third- party financing of solar energy projects completed or underway on publicly- owned property, especially ROW property? Please provide contact information for the public agencies for which these projects were developed. Sigora has not completed third-party projects on public property. We have completed a direct ownership project on the Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Facility located in Duffield County. Contact: Facilities Manager Rick (270) Are there any particular concerns with any of the information that has been provided in this RFI? Please explain those concerns and provide proposed solutions or mitigations to address those concerns. The RFI appears reasonable and appropriate for this level of investigation. More detail is needed on potential projects before we can be more detailed in our response and pricing structures. 4. Do you foresee state or federal legislative issues that would hinder the feasibility of the Project? If so, then what are they and how could they be resolved? There are a number of legislative issues on both the state and federal side that could potentially affect the outcome of this Project. First and foremost is the expiration of the Federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC) set for December 31, This 30% tax credit is a critical component to the success of third-party owned solar systems. Without extension of the credit, there will likely need to be a substitute incentive or policy to stimulate investment in third-party ownership of renewable energy systems. There were a number of bills introduced in the 2015 legislative session that had potential to stimulate the renewable sector in Virginia as well as this Project. Bills such as HB 1728 or HB 1650 would have provided a state tax credit or grant to supplement or replace the federal ITC. If this Project seeks Page 307

19 to expand PPA-type developments on state-owned buildings and ROW, legislation will be needed to expand the current PPA pilot program in Dominion territory to other utility territories such as APCo, the second largest investor-owned utility operating in Virginia. Legislation seeking to do this (HB 1926, SB 1160) did not pass this year. Another common barrier in solar energy development for this Project may be finding adequate end-users of large-scale system development. With current net-metering rules, utilities are only required to provide retail credit for energy production up to 100% of a building s annual consumption. In other words, an oversized system on a building will not yield an attractive economic return. At the same time, many properties not suitable for solar energy systems would greatly benefit from having access to solar energy. Community Net Metering would allow multiple sites to access the energy from one centrally located PV array, therefore, allowing end-users (properties) that may not otherwise be suitable for solar systems to access the benefits of solar energy. Large system hosts may also allow other end-users to subscribe to a portion of their system s energy and, therefore, have more incentive to fully utilize their optimal roof/ground space without fear of oversizing systems. HB 1636 introduced Community Net Metering but failed to pass. Community net metering may be a particularly great option for state owned property where all stakeholders can benefit. State owned property, such as large rooftops, open parks, right-of-ways, wastewater treatment plants, and other public property could be leased to project developers hosting solar PV arrays located close to a utility interconnection point. The developer will also recruit subscribers (public or private buildings) who pay for the electricity produced by the system. The utility may also benefit if given the opportunity to help designate preferred project sites for interconnection. These community solar projects will increase utility efficiencies by potentially providing distributed energy in areas that are distant from centralized plants, thus, lessening substantial transmission losses. One of the biggest drivers for PPA arrangements and third-party owned solar energy systems, is state mandated Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) and the subsequent SREC market that follows. Investors are far more likely to invest in a solar energy system knowing there will not only be economic return from utility savings/payments, the federal tax credit, and depreciation, but also high value SRECs. Currently, Virginia PV system owners can only sell their SRECs in the oversupplied Pennsylvania market for values far below those of neighboring states. HB 2075 and HB 0881 sought to advance an RPS and SREC registry, however, neither passed. Page 308

20 Project Structure and Development Delivery Method 5. What delivery methods are available for this Project? What are the advantages of each delivery method? What are the disadvantages of each delivery method? Which delivery method does the respondent prefer and why? Lease Buy Back Sigora Solar recommends the Lease Buy Back delivery method in considering no upfront cost PPA options for systems located on public property. This option utilizes a PV system lease to own agreement between a project integrator and a third party investor. The Lease Buy Back is also designed to Page 309

21 provide a lower than utility rate PPA for the designated host with future options to prepay or purchase the system at designated time periods. Compared to the traditional PPA option, this delivery method transfers a large portion of the risk from investor to project integrator. This delivery method provides suitable benefits to each party involved and is therefore a viable option. In a traditional PPA, the investor relies on the 30% federal tax credit, depreciation, SRECs, and utility payments. Because the investor seeks a high rate of return, this often leads to a utility payment from the host that is higher than current utility payments in the Virginia market. In other states, incentives for the investor (SRECs, state rebates, etc.) and higher electricity prices mitigate this problem. The Lease Buy Back model allows the investor to lock in a fixed and guaranteed lease payment, which will be higher than the utility payment and therefore lessens the risk and shortens the payback period of the investment. This method is still attractive for the project integrator who receives upfront capital at market value (third party assessed) for the project and over time pays for ownership of the system. While the lease payment is higher than the PPA utility payment, over the life of the system or agreement, the utility payment and SRECs still make this an attractive investment. Lastly, the host benefits from a no upfront cost solar energy system with a PPA rate lower than that of the utility. The host is typically provided an option to prepay the PPA, purchase the system at fair market value, or renew the PPA at the end of the designated agreement period. Page 310

22 Traditional PPA Traditional PPAs operate differently than the Lease Buy Back method in that the investor retains ownership of the system and negotiates a PPA directly with the host. The project integrator s role is to engage in a contract with the investor to design, install, and possibly maintain the system. Unfortunately, with a lack of incentives within the Commonwealth, these agreements are rare and often economically ineffective. Without the support of high value SRECs or state rebates/tax credits, the investor s PPA price of energy needed to charge to the host, to compensate for the lack of incentives, is likely to be unattractive to the host (higher than current utility rate). Conversely, if the investor creates an attractive PPA price of energy below the host s existing rate, the investor s rate of return may be inadequate. Page 311

23 Direct Ownership Sigora Solar believes this is the most attractive option for Commonwealth buildings; however, it requires significant upfront capital and cannot make use of the federal tax credit. Solar PV energy systems are proven to not only pay for themselves well before the end of their useful lifespan but also provide significant additional economic return post payback period. In other words, the long-term benefits of owning a system far outweigh the cost. For this reason, we believe direct ownership may be the best model when possible. With economies of scale, the project integrator s price can be low enough to compensate for the lack of federal tax credit. The Commonwealth may also have access to inexpensive capital to finance these projects. 6. What are the key success factors facilitating and barriers impeding success that would make delivering a solar energy project more or less likely in Virginia? Incentive / Policy Structure: Many of the incentives and policies mentioned in response to question 4 should be considered factors facilitating or barriers impeding success of solar energy development in Virginia. Presence of Neighboring State Incentives: Page 312

24 Large investors with familiarity in renewables are more likely to work in states with policies and incentives designed to advance development of solar energy projects. The close proximity of states like Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York, North Carolina, and the District of Columbia, which have these policies and incentives, make it particularly difficult to attract experienced investors. Compounding this barrier, organizations looking to invest in Virginia often do not have the experience or renewable investment literacy, which other investors more experienced in third-party PPA arrangements do have. State Permitting Regulations: Larger installations, particularly ground mounts, can incur costs related to environmental site development regulations. The development of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and other state-administered environmental reviews are a critical function of state government as they protect our undeveloped lands from undue human harm. We fully support this regulatory framework but recognize that costs could be minimized for all parties if the Commonwealth uses its own resources to investigate and satisfy the various permitting requirements imposed by other branches of state government. Likewise, the Commonwealth s participation in utility interconnection discussions will be an important factor in the cost-effective success of this program. 7. What are the advantages and disadvantages of one large singular site versus multiple sites packaged together into one project? Singular Site: Sigora Solar is capable of designing and installing solar PV energy systems on both large singular sites (roof or ground) as well as multiple sites packaged together. Advantages of one large singular site include: 1. Increased design and installation efficiencies 2. Fewer permitting and interconnection costs 3. Increased publicity for large, visible projects Disadvantages of one large singular site include: 1. Potential grid instability (depending on size, electrical configuration, transformers, etc.) Page 313

25 2. Additional costs associated with working at length with utility engineering department 3. Limitations on system size suitable for site (no incentive to overproduce annually) Multiple Sites: Advantages of multiple sites packaged into one project include: 1. Quicker permitting and interconnection per site. 2. More distributed impact on grid 3. Geographically increased visibility 4. More competitive bidding process (attracts project integrators that may otherwise be unqualified for large scale projects) Disadvantages of multiple sites packaged into one project include: 1. Potential higher costs and longer timelines 2. Potentially less optimal design (less-than-perfect roof, heat, angle, orientation, etc.) 8. If multiple sites were packaged together, then what are the possible packaging options? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each option? Which option does your firm prefer? There are many options for packaging multiple sites. The Project Organizer could bundle sites and release RFP/RFQs based on geographic area, individual system sizes, bundled systems sizes, only roof mounts, only ground mounts, and many other options. By releasing multiple RFP/RFQs based on various aggregate/bundled system sizes, there may be more competition from contractors who specialize in certain system size ranges or types. Most of the advantages and disadvantages depend on scale and are the same as referenced in Question 7. Sigora Solar feels comfortable bidding on a broad range of projects and does not have a strong preference. Project Site 9. Based upon the information provided in this RFI, what type of site defined by location, size and other relevant characteristics presents the best opportunity for placement of a solar energy project in Virginia and why? Page 314

26 Ideal site characteristics include: 1. Open land of acre or more, unobstructed by shade 2. Large, low sloped rooftops, reasonably free of obstructions (sq. ft. of usable roof space affects system size 100sq. ft. per 1 kw) 3. Large pitched asphalt shingle or standing seem rooftops facing south, reasonably free of obstructions. Another important characteristic to take into account will be the property s energy appetite. Without adequate annual energy consumption, the PV system will have little economic value in our current net metering framework. One example would be the Park and Ride sites, which need community net metering (virtual hosts) or an RPS to incentive utility to finance. Natural solar resources also vary throughout the country and state as seen in the National Renewable Energy Laboratory s (NREL) Photovoltaic Solar Resource map below. While the difference is not dramatic enough to make solar ineffective in certain areas, studies show that PV systems will perform more productively in certain areas (warmer colors are better PV resource areas). Page 315

27 10. What type of site offers the best opportunity for replication on other sites in Virginia? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this type of site? See Question How should sites be pre- qualified for bid without the time and expense of detailed engineering at each site? What site assessment tools or qualifiers should be utilized? There are a wide variety of solar energy analysis and remote assessment tools that are available on the market today. Commonly used remote assessment tools for pre-qualifying sites include Google Earth, Helioscope, and Pictometry. Typical features taken into consideration during a remote site assessment are roof size, orientation, and potential obstructions. After site characteristics have been considered, production analysis tools such as PVsyst or HOMER should be utilized to accurately assess the solar production potential of a given site and design. The Project Organizer should expect that many roof-mounted sites will require structural engineering reviews and ground mounted systems will require geotechnical reports prior to installation. 12. What information would a private developer require in order to facilitate project development Sigora Solar would seek information pertaining to the number of projects, size of projects, as well as available site info. Site info should include each property s physical address, primary use, roof type, utility usage history, and electrical service/provider. With this information, Sigora would have the opportunity to research the sites, begin preliminary system designs, and potentially engage with investors interested in a third-party financing model. It is also beneficial to provide any key components that must be met for a successful project, such as desired ownership models, financial thresholds, and project deadlines. Commercial and Financial Structure Page 316

28 13. Based upon the delivery methods identified above, who would own the assets, equipment and capital plant in each delivery method? What are the essential terms of the contract for these delivery methods, including the optimal concession period? Please see question 5 for more details pertaining system ownership. 14. What financing structure is the most feasible and would provide the best value for Virginia? Please see question 5 for more details pertaining to project model feasibility. 15. Do you anticipate public or utility (other than adopted tariffs) funding or incentives being available for the Project? If so, then what would be the anticipated source of these funds or incentives and how do they add value to the Project? Sigora Solar does not anticipate or require any additional funding or incentives to be available for this project, however, we have outline several throughout this RFI that would help facilitate the expansion and success of this Project. 16. Is a solar energy project installation and operation possible without a public subsidy, and if not, what specific subsidies would be required, from whom and why? Sigora Solar believes this Project is feasible with the federal Investment Tax Credit but without additional public subsidy. However, without additional subsidies, individual projects using third-party ownership models will need to be implemented before the federal tax credit expiration on December 31, What threshold financial arrangements would be necessary or other critical factors resolved to successfully complete the Project? Please outline in order of relative importance. If this Project seeks to implement a third-party ownership and finance model, there are a number of financial thresholds and critical factors that need to be met for each party listed below. Host: The PPA cost of energy must deliver better value than utility rate over the life of the system. This is difficult without state or utility incentives such as Page 317

29 high value SREC, tax credit, utility rebate, etc. Without community/virtual net metering, the host must have adequate energy appetite (system production should not exceed annual consumption). Investor: Lease or PPA payment to investor must deliver adequate rate of return within a reasonable time period. The investor needs the tax appetite and an adequate market value of system to obtain an attractive tax benefit and depreciation value. Project Integrator: If using Lease Buy Back model, the PPA value of energy must deliver adequate rate or return (likely to be less than lease payment but carried out over longer period of time). Project Schedule and Solicitation Schedule 18. What major steps are needed from Notice of Award for the Project to full operation of the Project? What are the approximate elapsed times associated with these identified steps? What are the key decision points in the process (including go/no go decisions) and why? The specifics of project steps and timelines will only become evident with the issuance of a detailed RFP. 19. What are the critical path items for the procurement for this Project and why? The specific procurement and implementation timelines for this project will only become evident with the issuance of a detailed RFP. 20. The currently available federal incentives require an expedited time frame due to expiration December 31, Does this constraint pose a threat to utilizing these incentives for the Project? The expiration of the federal tax credit may be the biggest obstacle in this Project as project integrators seek to place systems into service prior to December 31, The 30% federal tax credit is a key component in attracting investors for third- party solar energy development projects. Without introduction of a state tax credit, direct Page 318

30 ownership may be the only attractive delivery method for solar on publicly owned property. Solicitation 21. Looking ahead, would the respondent be interested in submitting a committed proposal for the development of the Project? Are there any particular concerns that may prevent the respondent from engaging in the project development? How might those concerns be resolved? Sigora Solar would be very interested in developing a proposal for this Project or multiple subsets of this project (i.e. distributed blocks of solar development). However, in order for our company to offer the Lease Buy Back or traditional PPA delivery method, there must be adequate federal or state tax incentives to attract investors (at minimum the existing federal tax credit). We are currently forming partnerships for PPA projects within Virginia and have successfully implemented PPA projects outside of Virginia. Sigora Solar would also be interested in developing a proposal for this Project if the direct ownership delivery method is chosen. We feel confident that with scale, our projects will be an attractive investment for the Commonwealth. 22. What are the key elements of a RFQ for a solar energy project? Please provide references to other RFQs that have effectively elicited innovated proposals for solar energy projects on publicly- owned property and resulted in successfully completed projects. Please see question 12 for information pertaining to key RFQ elements. 23. What is the minimum amount of time that your firm requires for developing and submitting a Statement of Qualifications ( SOQ ) for the Project after issuance of a potential RFQ? Once presented with a more defined scope, Sigora can submit a detailed Statement of Qualifications within approximately one month. 24. What are the key elements of a RFP for a solar energy project?? Please provide references to other RFPs that have effectively elicited innovated proposals for solar energy projects on publicly- owned property and resulted in successfully completed projects. Sigora Solar previously responded to the Albemarle County Public Schools RFP for Solar Power Purchase Agreements Services, however, we were not Page 319

31 asked to negotiate an official contract nor has any official contract been awarded to any party at this time. Key elements of this RFP included: 1. Purpose 2. Background 3. Statement of Needs 4. Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions 5. Evaluation and award Criteria 6. Reporting and Delivery Instructions 7. General Terms and Conditions Despite not being awarded this project, Sigora Solar found the RFP process to be beneficial in securing third-party investors for future projects and better understanding the limitations of traditional PPA agreements. In part due to our experiences with this RFP, we have sought out a better way to arrange similar projects in the form of the Lease Buy Back option described in the Project Deliver section. 25. What is the minimum amount of time required by the respondent for developing and submitting a committed detailed proposal for the Project after issuance of a potential RFP? Additional Considerations 26. Please provide any comments on other creative project scope ideas, procurement options, technical considerations, etc. that VAP3 should take into account. Our pertinent ideas, options, and considerations have all been listed elsewhere in this statement of information. 27. What are the top risks for successful delivery of this Project and why? What potential impact could the identified risks have? What potential mitigation strategies could be employed to decrease the identified risks? 28. In the respondent s experience, what type of public benefit and economic development could a large solar energy project (>100kW) foster in terms of new businesses and job creation? New large- scale solar development is a huge employment opportunity. Our company employs 23 professionals, most of who were not involved in the solar industry before being hired and trained by Sigora. Solar is an economically Page 320

32 advantageous source of energy, but it is also the most labor- intensive source of energy available. A state- wide governmental solar development project would result in a more robust, competitive solar industry in the Commonwealth. If Sigora obtained large- scale work through this Project, we would hire at minimum ten new employees, possibly as many as What challenges related to communication with local officials, communities and business does the respondent foresee and what strategies are suggested to be employed to maintain open and transparent relationships? One advantage of working directly with the Commonwealth is that normal hurdles to successful implementation such as utility interconnection and local business relationships would be less critical with Virginia governmental involvement. 30. Other than the answers already provided, what information would help the respondent make the business decision to engage in the development of the Project? We look forward to the next stage of the project, namely a detailed RFP with site information, project specifics, and a defined scope and timeline. This information will allow us to furnish a high-quality, extremely competitive bid to help Virginia go solar. Respectfully, Andy Bogdan Bindea Founder and President Cell: Bogdan.Bindea@SigoraSolar.com Page 321

33 March 13th, 2015 Telamon Corporation 1000 E. 116 th Street Carmel, IN Prepared for: Virginia Public- Private partnerships Page 322

34 Information Requested General 1. What relevant qualifications and experience does the respondent have in developing and delivering large (>100kW) solar energy projects? Telamon Project Information: Indianapolis Airport: Location: Indianapolis Airport Size: 12.5 MW Type: Ground Mount Development Cost: $35-40 million Financing methods: Equity and Debt financing Current Status: 1 year since commissioning Indianapolis airport Phase 1(12.5 MW) and Phase 2 (7.5 MW) project sites. Ohio State Transportation Center, Columbus Ohio: Location: Columbus, Ohio Type: Rooftop Current Status: 1 year since commissioning Size: 600 KW Page 323

35 This project was a joint venture between Telamon Corporation and GES Corp. Telamon served as Project Manager & Project Coordinator. Telamon Corporation, 1000 E. 116 th St. Carmel: Location: Carmel, Indiana Type: Rooftop Current Status: 2 year since commissioning Size: 50 KW Telamon served in all capacities. 2. What specific experience does the respondent have in third-party financing of solar energy projects completed or underway on publicly-owned property, especially ROW property? Please provide contact information for the public agencies for which these projects were developed. Telamon Corporation partnered with the Indianapolis Airport Authority (IAA), the City of Indianapolis, and Indianapolis Power & Light Company (IPL) to build the largest solar farm on airport real estate in North America. The solar energy produced is sold to IPL through a 15-year power purchase program and feed into the grid of existing surface transmission lines that connect the airport terminal to the IPL substation west of the airport. Telamon served as the Project Manager and Project Coordinator and worked with Cenergy Power on this project. Telamon s expertise and financial strength, with revenues over $780 million, provided the basis for the project s development. Telamon was the first company to build a utility scale solar project in Indiana which became the largest airport solar project in the US. Telamon took the lead in obtaining FAA approval, contracting an EPC and providing management and financial resources. Telamon provided the capital to procure $2,500,000 in solar modules to safe-harbor the federal 1603 grant. As the responsible party we secured all necessary construction funding to facilitate an on time and under budget completion of the project. Our project was the first utility scale solar project to interconnect to Indianapolis Power and Light (IPL). The Telamon team installed over 1,700 solar modules in a day during the project that totaled 44,128. During the construction phase, there were up to 140 temporary positions filled and 12 permanent positions created to manage and maintain the panels. The solar farm is expected to generate more than 16.5 million kilowatt hours of electric energy annually, enough to power more than 1,800 average American homes annually. The project security and access to the area was restricted and maintained by our management team. The team had onsite 24/7 security and access verification. Page 324

36 Reference Company Owner s Contact Name Title Address Phone Number address Indianapolis Airport Authority Kent Ebbing GM 7800 Col. H. Weir Cook Memorial Drive Indianapolis, IN kebbing@inzone.org 3. Are there any particular concerns with any of the information that has been provided in this RFI? Please explain those concerns and provide proposed solutions or mitigations to address those concerns. Have a person that is well informed on screening of the project sites understanding the value proposition in being a real developer and not a consultant, one that puts his own money at risk. Staying away from known properties types that are difficult to develop. Do not built carport structures unless the structure would be built anyway. Complexity adds cost; construction bonding, insurances, delays, bureaucracy, tax complexity, multiple agency and hierarchy, bank funding, private equity, developer funding, utility interconnection complexity and forms that require answers to questions that are not necessary or needed. The best solution would be that the state own the projects and have a bond fund to build 1 GW of power that is a must take by the utility company. This would eliminate multiple issues. Use part of it for roof top projects and the government would provide a fixed lease rate to owners. Page 325

Solar Financing for Municipalities

Solar Financing for Municipalities Solar Financing for Municipalities Providing Opportunities to Reduce Electricity Costs & Generate Resilient Local Economies Anthony E. Smith, PhD President/CEO Secure Futures, LLC About Secure Futures

More information

Solar Purchase Power Agreements Brief Sheet

Solar Purchase Power Agreements Brief Sheet Solar Purchase Power Agreements Brief Sheet The Essentials A Power Purchase Agreement is a contract between multiple parties, one who generates electricity for the purpose of sale (the seller) and one

More information

SMALL SOLAR. 2014 Nebraska Wind and Solar Conference and Exhibition. Guy C. Smith October 29, 2014

SMALL SOLAR. 2014 Nebraska Wind and Solar Conference and Exhibition. Guy C. Smith October 29, 2014 SMALL SOLAR 2014 Nebraska Wind and Solar Conference and Exhibition Guy C. Smith October 29, 2014 TYPES OF SOLAR PROJECTS Concentrated Solar Projects (CSP) Systems generate solar power using mirrors or

More information

Report on the Status of Net Energy Metering In the State of Maryland. Prepared by The Public Service Commission of Maryland

Report on the Status of Net Energy Metering In the State of Maryland. Prepared by The Public Service Commission of Maryland Report on the Status of Net Energy Metering In the State of Maryland Prepared by The Public Service Commission of Maryland Prepared for the General Assembly of Maryland Under Public Utilities Article 7-306(h)

More information

Leasing Residential PV Systems BY MICHAEL RUTBERG; ANTONIO BOUZA, ASSOCIATE MEMBER ASHRAE

Leasing Residential PV Systems BY MICHAEL RUTBERG; ANTONIO BOUZA, ASSOCIATE MEMBER ASHRAE This article was published in ASHRAE Journal, December 2013. Copyright 2013 ASHRAE. Posted at www.ashrae.org. This article may not be copied and/or distributed electronically or in paper form without permission

More information

Comments of the Edison Electric Institute Net Benefits and Costs of Distributed Solar Energy and Innovative Solar Deployment Models, DOE-EERE

Comments of the Edison Electric Institute Net Benefits and Costs of Distributed Solar Energy and Innovative Solar Deployment Models, DOE-EERE Comments of the Edison Electric Institute Net Benefits and Costs of Distributed Solar Energy and Innovative Solar Deployment Models, DOE-EERE Category 2 - Innovative Solar Deployment Models Edward H. Comer,

More information

2016 Santee Cooper Solar Home & Solar Share Home Program Manual

2016 Santee Cooper Solar Home & Solar Share Home Program Manual 2016-17 2016 Santee Cooper Solar Home & Solar Share Home Program Manual Version 03232016 This Program Manual is intended to serve as a reference for Santee Cooper s residential Customers that are interested

More information

Residential Consumer Guide to Solar Power

Residential Consumer Guide to Solar Power Residential Consumer Guide to Solar Power 505 9 th Street NW Suite 800 Washington DC 20004 202.682.0556 www.seia.org Table of Contents Residential Consumer Guide to Solar Power... 2 Introduction... 2 How

More information

NESEMC Top Solar Policies

NESEMC Top Solar Policies ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT NESEMC Top Solar Policies Connecticut This document was produced with the help of the Pace Energy and Climate Center s team of student researchers. The vast majority of the information

More information

PPA v. Lease. What is a PPA?

PPA v. Lease. What is a PPA? 2016 Government Practice Seminar Solar Power Purchase Agreements 9:00 a.m. 9:45 a.m. Presented by Rachel Rowley BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue,Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA 50309-2510 Telephone: 515-242-2417

More information

ON-SITE SOLAR GENERATION AT METRO OPPORTUNITIES & IMPLEMENTATION

ON-SITE SOLAR GENERATION AT METRO OPPORTUNITIES & IMPLEMENTATION ON-SITE SOLAR GENERATION AT METRO OPPORTUNITIES & IMPLEMENTATION CONTENTS Introduction...3 Why go solar?...4 What type of solar is best?...6 Where should solar be developed?...8 Implementation...10 Disclaimer:

More information

For companies that own or lease commercial property whether retail, industrial or office buildings

For companies that own or lease commercial property whether retail, industrial or office buildings Solar Analytics and Procurement Making the Business Case for Commercial Solar This paper provides a straightforward process to make the business case for specific cost-effective solar projects in your

More information

Making the Business Case for Solar Power on Commercial Properties

Making the Business Case for Solar Power on Commercial Properties Making the Business Case for Solar Power on Commercial Properties A Sample Internal Presentation to Corporate Decision-Makers Created by Alta Energy for companies that own or lease commercial property

More information

NESEMC Top Solar Policies

NESEMC Top Solar Policies ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT NESEMC Top Solar Policies Massachusetts This document was produced with the help of the Pace Energy and Climate Center s team of student researchers. The vast majority of the information

More information

Residential Consumer Guide to Solar Power June 2015

Residential Consumer Guide to Solar Power June 2015 Residential Consumer Guide to Solar Power 505 9 th Street NW Suite 800 Washington DC 20004 202.682.0556 www.seia.org SEIA RESIDENTIAL CONSUMER GUIDE TO SOLAR POWER Introduction How Solar Works Panels (or

More information

Virginia Solar Co-op FAQs

Virginia Solar Co-op FAQs Solar Basics How do solar panels work? Photovoltaic cells convert the energy from the sun into electricity and are arranged together to form solar panels. The inverters then convert the electricity generated

More information

VEDA Commercial Energy Loan Application

VEDA Commercial Energy Loan Application 9-24-13 58 East State Street Montpelier, VT 05602 802-828-5627 www.veda.org VEDA Commercial Energy Loan Application 1. APPLICANT(S)/BORROWERS(S) NAMES AND CONTACT INFORMATION Provide the name(s) and addresses

More information

FINANCING SCENARIOS FOR SOLAR

FINANCING SCENARIOS FOR SOLAR FINANCING SCENARIOS FOR SOLAR Jaimes Valdez March 31, 2015 Comparative Financing Models of Solar Energy Systems in Washington State Introduction The solar energy marketplace is rapidly evolving, and a

More information

RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENTS

RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENTS RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENTS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS SOLAR PV What are photovoltaics (PV)? First used in about 1890, the word photovoltaic has two parts; photo derived from the Greek for light, and

More information

Umass Research Farm, South Deerfield 70 panel, 16.45 kw project installed in 2010. Grafton Solar Forum. August 22, 2012

Umass Research Farm, South Deerfield 70 panel, 16.45 kw project installed in 2010. Grafton Solar Forum. August 22, 2012 Umass Research Farm, South Deerfield 70 panel, 16.45 kw project installed in 2010 Grafton Solar Forum August 22, 2012 Solar Industry Solar installations at the end of 2010 Globally 18,200 MW United States

More information

Solar Power in Schools: Opportunities. Marta Tomic Solar Clean Energy Program Manager

Solar Power in Schools: Opportunities. Marta Tomic Solar Clean Energy Program Manager Solar Power in Schools: Opportunities Marta Tomic Solar Clean Energy Program Manager Site Specific Nature of Solar Solar photovoltaic (PV) pricing depends on site selection Roof mount vs ground mount Orientation

More information

10 Questions to Ask Before Installing Solar Power on Agency Facilities

10 Questions to Ask Before Installing Solar Power on Agency Facilities Page 1 of 5 Send to printer Close window 10 Questions to Ask Before Installing Solar Power on Agency Facilities BY EVA SPIEGEL Eva Spiegel is communications director for the League and can be reached at

More information

Solar Power Cost Effects on Customers

Solar Power Cost Effects on Customers Austin s Solar Tool Box Value of Solar, Community Solar and Solar Leasing Kaiba White kaibawhite@gmail.com Value of Solar Tariff Value of solar (VoS) is available to residential customers for solar installations

More information

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY UNDOCKETED: SOLAR ENERGY IN FLORIDA STAFF S REQUEST FOR COMMENTS INTRODUCTION PAGE 1 OF 1 FILED: JUNE 23, 2015.

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY UNDOCKETED: SOLAR ENERGY IN FLORIDA STAFF S REQUEST FOR COMMENTS INTRODUCTION PAGE 1 OF 1 FILED: JUNE 23, 2015. INTRODUCTION PAGE 1 OF 1 Introduction Solar power is an important part of Florida s energy future and can provide a number of benefits to Florida and its citizens by generating power without emissions

More information

Harnessing Solar Energy for Broiler Production

Harnessing Solar Energy for Broiler Production Harnessing Solar Energy for Broiler Production University of Delaware Photovoltaic Poultry House Project Robin Morgan March 17, 2008 Biofuels Research Biomass genomics will facilitate the use of woody

More information

Rooftop Revenues. How Your Business Can Profit from Solar Energy.

Rooftop Revenues. How Your Business Can Profit from Solar Energy. Rooftop Revenues How Your Business Can Profit from Solar Energy. White Paper Introduction The decision to implement a solar PV system, once dismissed as an overly expensive investment, can now be backed

More information

ReVision Energy. Community Solar Farms (CSFs) & Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)

ReVision Energy. Community Solar Farms (CSFs) & Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) ReVision Energy Community Solar Farms (CSFs) & Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) Who is ReVision Energy? Engineers: NABCEP: Solar Certifications: College Degree: Projects: Brown, Dartmouth, MIT, UNH 8 Certifications

More information

Community Solar Iowa Economic Development Community Efficient and Renewable Energy Workshop

Community Solar Iowa Economic Development Community Efficient and Renewable Energy Workshop Community Solar Iowa Economic Development Community Efficient and Renewable Energy Workshop Warren McKenna -- Farmers Electric Cooperative wmckenna@feckalona.com FEC - The Vision 25x25 25% reduction of

More information

Community Solar Roof Guide

Community Solar Roof Guide Community Solar Roof Guide Installing a community owned solar roof has become a reality in the UK since the introduction of the Feed-in-Tariff in April 2010, which pays renewable energy generators a premium

More information

Duke Energy Florida. Solar Energy in Florida FPSC Request for Comments. Enhancing the development of solar technologies in Florida

Duke Energy Florida. Solar Energy in Florida FPSC Request for Comments. Enhancing the development of solar technologies in Florida 2015 Duke Energy Florida Solar Energy in Florida FPSC Request for Comments Enhancing the development of solar technologies in Florida INTRODUCTION Duke Energy is committed to providing safe, reliable,

More information

Overcoming the First Cost Barrier to Ground Source Heat Pump Technology: The Utility Ground Loop Service Provider Concept

Overcoming the First Cost Barrier to Ground Source Heat Pump Technology: The Utility Ground Loop Service Provider Concept Overcoming the First Cost Barrier to Ground Source Heat Pump Technology: The Utility Ground Loop Service Provider Concept 1 Overcoming the First Cost Barrier to Ground Source Heat Pump Technology: The

More information

Community Solar Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities Energy 2013 Conference

Community Solar Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities Energy 2013 Conference Community Solar Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities Energy 2013 Conference Warren McKenna -- Farmers Electric Cooperative wmckenna@feckalona.com Solar Energy Paradigm Shift FERC Chair Jon Wellinghoff:

More information

DATE: April 14, 2014 REPORT NO. PW2014-024. Chair and Members Committee of the Whole Operations and Administration

DATE: April 14, 2014 REPORT NO. PW2014-024. Chair and Members Committee of the Whole Operations and Administration PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION DATE: April 14, 2014 REPORT NO. PW2014-024 TO: FROM: Chair and Members Committee of the Whole Operations and Administration Geoff Rae, MBA, P.Eng. General Manager, Public Works

More information

TOWN OF BERLIN REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

TOWN OF BERLIN REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS TOWN OF BERLIN REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Notice is hereby given that qualifications will be received by the Town of Berlin, Maryland for: RFQ # 2015 4 Community Solar Garden: Design, Build, Finance, Operate

More information

The Environmental Commission and the Department of Public Utilities or Engineering Department should lead and be involved with this tool.

The Environmental Commission and the Department of Public Utilities or Engineering Department should lead and be involved with this tool. Solar Energy Demonstration Project For more information, see www.sustainablejersey.com The sun s rays are a 100% clean and renewable source of energy, and solar (along with wind), are the two fastest-growing

More information

City of North Adams Solar Project: All of the City s Electricity needs from the Sun for Years to Come

City of North Adams Solar Project: All of the City s Electricity needs from the Sun for Years to Come City of North Adams Solar Project: All of the City s Electricity needs from the Sun for Years to Come Drury HS Harriman & West Airport E Street Landfill Old Waste Water Treatment Plant BlueWave Capital

More information

MAKING SOLAR ENERGY COST-EFFECTIVE TODAY IS A SNAP

MAKING SOLAR ENERGY COST-EFFECTIVE TODAY IS A SNAP MAKING SOLAR ENERGY COST-EFFECTIVE TODAY IS A SNAP Dr. James A. White, P.E. Senior Energy Services Engineer Chelan County Public Utility District P.O. Box 1231 Wenatchee, Washington 98807 jamesa@chelanpud.org

More information

SOLAR POWER IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY MARKETS AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS

SOLAR POWER IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY MARKETS AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS SOLAR POWER IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY MARKETS AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PLANNING OFFICE APRIL 2010 1 FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PAPER OR SANTA CLARA COUNTY S PV PROGRAM, CONTACT KATJA

More information

Solar Power HourSM. Solar educa on for your community.

Solar Power HourSM. Solar educa on for your community. Solar Power HourSM Solar educa on for your community. 1 Contents About. 1 Commonly Asked Questions.. 2-3 The Solar Site Assessment.. 3-4 Selecting a Solar Installer. 5-7 Certified Installers by State.

More information

State Solar Incentives News from DSIRE

State Solar Incentives News from DSIRE Excerpt from: IREC 2006: pdates & Trends, Interstate Renewable Energy Council, October 2006 State Solar Incentives News from DSIRE Report by Susan Gouchoe Over the past year, we ve seen a number of states

More information

Solar Leasing. Introduction. Background of Solar Leasing in Texas

Solar Leasing. Introduction. Background of Solar Leasing in Texas Solar Leasing Introduction A relatively new option for homeowners looking to add solar to their home is the solar lease. At present, the solar lease option can be found in California, Arizona, Texas, Colorado,

More information

MICHIGAN MARKET BRIEF: CORPORATE RENEWABLE ENERGY PURCHASING

MICHIGAN MARKET BRIEF: CORPORATE RENEWABLE ENERGY PURCHASING ADVANCED ENERGY ECONOMY the business voice of advanced energy MICHIGAN MARKET BRIEF: CORPORATE RENEWABLE ENERGY PURCHASING Based on Analysis by Meister Consultants Group January, 2016 Overview A growing

More information

Solar Power Frequently Asked Questions

Solar Power Frequently Asked Questions General information about solar power 1. How do I get solar power? Solar Power Frequently Asked Questions Many companies install solar power systems including some electricity retailers. It is worth comparing

More information

How To Run A Solar Power Plant

How To Run A Solar Power Plant PROFITABLE SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH SOLAR MEETING A GENDA Introduction Solar & Cold Storage Solar Service Models POLICY Financial Benefits Representative Projects Facility Considerations Market Review Heartland

More information

Sunrun project policies guidebook

Sunrun project policies guidebook Sunrun project policies guidebook a handy guide about the projects we want (and the ones we don t) CSLB #969975; NJ #13VH07020300 Project Policies Guidebook Sunrun and our partner network put in service

More information

Banking on Renewables

Banking on Renewables RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE BRIEFINGS Banking on Renewables These Briefings showcase different facets of the rural infrastructure industries: power, energy, and utilities; water utilities; and communications.

More information

Solar Photovoltaic Frequently Asked Questions

Solar Photovoltaic Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents 1. What is Solar Energy?... 2 2. What are the basic component of a Solar PV system?.2 3. What are the different types of PV systems ATL offers?...2 4. What is the difference between mono-crystalline

More information

Solar Power Purchase Agreements & Leases

Solar Power Purchase Agreements & Leases Solar Power Purchase Agreements & Leases Angela Lipanovich, Esq. March 7, 2012 Copyright 2012, Estriatus Law. All rights reserved. Conditions of Usage and Disclaimer 1 Estriatus Law grants the following

More information

Clean State Energy Actions 2011 Update. colorado

Clean State Energy Actions 2011 Update. colorado Energy Efficiency Building Energy Codes Utility Demand-Side-Management Energy Savings Targets/Energy Efficiency Resource Standards Residential: 2003 IECC, required in jurisdictions with a building code

More information

Developing Solar Photovoltaic for Competitively Priced Energy

Developing Solar Photovoltaic for Competitively Priced Energy 66 Cogeneration and Distributed Generation Journal Developing Solar Photovoltaic for Competitively Priced Energy Rose A. Hanzlik CEM Constellation Energy ABSTRACT Parker Hannifin Corporation ( Parker ),

More information

Commercial & Industrial

Commercial & Industrial 0 Commercial & Industrial 1 Cut the cord on rising energy costs Looking for a way to reduce your operating expenses and increase profits? Install a solar energy system and generate your own clean, renewable

More information

Solar Power Purchase Agreements & Other Learnings Brian Millberg Energy Manager, City of Minneapolis Gayle Prest l Sustainability Director, City of

Solar Power Purchase Agreements & Other Learnings Brian Millberg Energy Manager, City of Minneapolis Gayle Prest l Sustainability Director, City of Solar Power Purchase Agreements & Other Learnings Brian Millberg Energy Manager, City of Minneapolis Gayle Prest l Sustainability Director, City of Minneapolis Minneapolis Solar Installations Solar Thermal:

More information

A Guide to State and Federal Solar Electric Incentives for Boston Affordable Housing Developers

A Guide to State and Federal Solar Electric Incentives for Boston Affordable Housing Developers A Guide to State and Federal Solar Electric Incentives for Boston Affordable Housing Developers Prepared by The Solar Boston Initiative and the Green Affordable Housing Program City of Boston Department

More information

Wholesale Renewable Energy Generation Feasibility Presented to Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District Board June 27, 2013

Wholesale Renewable Energy Generation Feasibility Presented to Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District Board June 27, 2013 Wholesale Renewable Energy Generation Feasibility Presented to Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District Board June 27, 2013 Clean Energy Solutions Overview of the Feasibility Study Site Characteristics and

More information

SOLON. Solar Solutions for Wastewater Treatment Plants EN. SOLON Solar Solutions for Wastewater Treatment Plants.

SOLON. Solar Solutions for Wastewater Treatment Plants EN. SOLON Solar Solutions for Wastewater Treatment Plants. SOLON. Solar Solutions for Wastewater Treatment Plants EN SOLON Solar Solutions for Wastewater Treatment Plants. 3 Solar power pays off for the environment. Purchasing solar energy today will save up to

More information

Solar PV For Surrey Schools - Information Pack

Solar PV For Surrey Schools - Information Pack Solar PV For Surrey Schools - Information Pack Solar PV for Surrey Schools: Summary of options and key considerations School interested in solar PV OPTION 1 Own investment: School is responsible for the

More information

Before the Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 ) ) ) ) ) ) NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy

Before the Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 ) ) ) ) ) ) NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Before the Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy )

More information

CANADIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICIES. Matthew H. Brown InterEnergy Solutions 2007

CANADIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICIES. Matthew H. Brown InterEnergy Solutions 2007 CANADIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICIES Matthew H. Brown InterEnergy Solutions 2007 The following offers an overview of Canadian federal and provincial policies that promote renewable energy. It is excerpted

More information

RE-Powering America s Land Initiative Management Plan

RE-Powering America s Land Initiative Management Plan RE-Powering America s Land Initiative Management Plan EPA launched RE-Powering America s Land: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine Sites to encourage the siting of renewable

More information

PAYBACK ON RESIDENTIAL PV SYSTEMS WITH PERFORMANCE BASED INCENTIVES AND RENEWABLE ENERGY CERTIFICATES

PAYBACK ON RESIDENTIAL PV SYSTEMS WITH PERFORMANCE BASED INCENTIVES AND RENEWABLE ENERGY CERTIFICATES PAYBACK ON RESIDENTIAL PV SYSTEMS WITH PERFORMANCE BASED INCENTIVES AND RENEWABLE ENERGY CERTIFICATES Andy Black OnGrid Solar Energy Systems 4175 Renaissance Dr #4 San Jose, CA 95134, USA e-mail: andy@ongridnet

More information

Thanks for your interest in going solar at one of our group off-site solar farms.

Thanks for your interest in going solar at one of our group off-site solar farms. Page 1 of 15 September 2015 Dear : Group Solar Farm Panel Purchase and License Quote Thanks for your interest in going solar at one of our group off-site solar farms. If you are a Green Mountain Power

More information

Distributed Generation: Frequently Asked Questions

Distributed Generation: Frequently Asked Questions Distributed Generation: Frequently Asked Questions 1) What is distributed generation (DG)? Generating technologies located close to where the electricity is being used that are connected to the electric

More information

Exploration of Solar Power for the Modern Poultry Farm

Exploration of Solar Power for the Modern Poultry Farm Exploration of Solar Power for the Modern Poultry Farm Dennis Brothers, Jess Campbell, Jeremiah Davis, Gene Simpson, Jim Donald National Poultry Technology Center, May 2016 The ever evolving modern poultry

More information

Solar Energy Update. Transportation & Environment Committee Presentation June 11, 2012

Solar Energy Update. Transportation & Environment Committee Presentation June 11, 2012 Solar Energy Update Transportation & Environment Committee Presentation June 11, 2012 1 Background Purpose: Update from February 13, 2012 briefing Feasible Projects Convention Center Solar Farm(s) DPD/DFD

More information

Solar Leasing for Residential Photovoltaic Systems

Solar Leasing for Residential Photovoltaic Systems Solar Leasing for Residential Photovoltaic Systems Introduction In the past year, the residential solar lease has received significant attention in the solar marketplace, primarily for its ability to leverage

More information

WELCOME! SAME Energy and Sustainability Committee Cracking the Contracting Code for Large-Scale Solar Webinar

WELCOME! SAME Energy and Sustainability Committee Cracking the Contracting Code for Large-Scale Solar Webinar WELCOME! SAME Energy and Sustainability Committee Cracking the Contracting Code for Large-Scale Solar Webinar Committee Chair: Col. John Mogge, RA, F.SAME, USAF (Ret.), CH2M HILL Committee Vice Chair:

More information

Solar Energy Regulation

Solar Energy Regulation Solar Energy Regulation Overview 2 What is solar energy? Examples Benefits Planning Regulatory options Access and siting Incentives 1 3 Solar or Photovoltaic (PV) What is solar/pv? 4 Technology that converts

More information

CUMBERLAND COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY

CUMBERLAND COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY CUMBERLAND COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY 333 Water Street BRIDGETON, NEW JERSEY 08302 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO: Provide Turnkey Design-build Services For Photovoltaic (Solar) Generation System September 2009

More information

PG&E and Renewable Energy. Chuck Hornbrook Senior Manager Solar and Customer Generation

PG&E and Renewable Energy. Chuck Hornbrook Senior Manager Solar and Customer Generation PG&E and Renewable Energy Chuck Hornbrook Senior Manager Solar and Customer Generation PG&E and our Business What we do: Deliver safe, reliable, and environmentally responsible gas and electricity to approximately

More information

Solar barriers to entry for low and middle Income Marylanders: Identifying roadblocks and proposing solutions

Solar barriers to entry for low and middle Income Marylanders: Identifying roadblocks and proposing solutions Solar barriers to entry for low and middle Income Marylanders: Identifying roadblocks and proposing solutions While Maryland ranks 14 th in the nation is solar capacity installed and the state has established

More information

Financing Renewable Energy in New Jersey

Financing Renewable Energy in New Jersey Financing Renewable Energy in New Jersey Renewable Energy Procurement Workshop Sustainable Jersey and the Atlantic County Utilities Authority Presenters Douglas J. Bacher, Managing Director Dianna C. Geist,

More information

Something New Under the Sun: Competition and Consumer Protection Issues in Solar Power A Federal Trade Commission Workshop

Something New Under the Sun: Competition and Consumer Protection Issues in Solar Power A Federal Trade Commission Workshop Something New Under the Sun: Competition and Consumer Protection Issues in Solar Power A Federal Trade Commission Workshop The Federal Trade Commission will hold a one-day workshop to explore competition

More information

Western Australian Feed-In Tariff Discussion Paper

Western Australian Feed-In Tariff Discussion Paper Western Australian Feed-In Tariff Discussion Paper OVERVIEW In September 2008, the incoming State Government announced its intention to introduce a feed-in tariff as part of the Liberal Plan for Environmental

More information

Energy Savings through Solar Energy for Municipalities

Energy Savings through Solar Energy for Municipalities Energy Savings through Solar Energy for Municipalities September 2014 2014 Sunvestment Group www.sunvestmentgroup.com Topics to Cover Who We Are RER Energy Group Sunvestment Group Why Now for Solar Energy

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. VIVINT SOLAR, INC. PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. VIVINT SOLAR, INC. PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Docket No. VIVINT SOLAR, INC. PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING I. Introduction Pursuant to N.H. Code Admin. R. Ann. PUC 203

More information

Energy Benefits Yolo Program: Solar FAQ

Energy Benefits Yolo Program: Solar FAQ Energy Benefits Yolo Program: Solar FAQ Please visit www.mygroupenergy.com/yolo Program Questions What is Energy Benefits Yolo? The Energy Benefits program is an effort of the Yolo Climate Compact and

More information

Net Energy Metering and the Future of Distributed Generation

Net Energy Metering and the Future of Distributed Generation Net Energy Metering and the Future of Distributed Generation Vishal C. Patel, P.E. Manager - Distribution Resource Interconnections April 28, 2015 What is Net Energy Metering (NEM)? NEM is a tariffed program

More information

[SOLAR SUCCESS] Customer Benefits

[SOLAR SUCCESS] Customer Benefits [Solar power Smarter, cleaner, brighter] [SOLAR SUCCESS] Customer Overview The General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Building is a four-story building in the heart of downtown Sacramento, CA. The

More information

Maryland Solar Co-op FAQs

Maryland Solar Co-op FAQs Solar Basics How do solar panels work? Photovoltaic cells convert the energy from the sun into electricity and are arranged together to form solar panels. The inverters then convert the electricity generated

More information

Corporate Renewable Energy Procurement: Industry Insights

Corporate Renewable Energy Procurement: Industry Insights Corporate Renewable Energy Procurement: Industry Insights June 2016 AMERICAN COUNCIL ON RENEWABLE ENERGY ACORE is a national non profit organization dedicated to advancing the renewable energy sector through

More information

MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY NANTUCKET ELECTRIC COMPANY NET METERING PROVISION

MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY NANTUCKET ELECTRIC COMPANY NET METERING PROVISION Sheet 1 Applicability The following tariff provisions shall be applicable to a Host Customer, as defined herein, that requests net metering services from the Distribution Company, with the exception of

More information

Who is Belmont Goes Solar?

Who is Belmont Goes Solar? Who is Belmont Goes Solar? 200 Group of environmentally conscious citizens that support solar in Belmont: Supported by the Board of Selectmen Belmont Energy Committee Mothers Out Front Sustainable Belmont

More information

Evaluating Renewable Energy Opportunities THE APACHE POWDER SUPERFUND SITE, BENSON, ARIZONA

Evaluating Renewable Energy Opportunities THE APACHE POWDER SUPERFUND SITE, BENSON, ARIZONA Evaluating Renewable Energy Opportunities THE APACHE POWDER SUPERFUND SITE, BENSON, ARIZONA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund Redevelopment Initiative February 2011 Table of Contents This

More information

Renewable Choice Energy

Renewable Choice Energy Catawba College Table of Contents About Renewable Choice The Problem: Electricity Production Today The Solutions: Renewable Energy Sources Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) Who can participate in Renewable

More information

Retail Licence Exemptions for Solar Power Purchase Agreement Providers. Department of Finance Public Utilities July 2015

Retail Licence Exemptions for Solar Power Purchase Agreement Providers. Department of Finance Public Utilities July 2015 2/164 Balcatta Rd, Balcatta WA 6021 1300 897 441 www.carbonfootie.com.au Retail Licence Exemptions for Solar Power Purchase Agreement Providers Carbon Footie Submission to Draft Recommendations Report

More information

Renewable Energy System Permit Fees in Oregon. Prepared by Brien Sipe July 20, 2006 On behalf of

Renewable Energy System Permit Fees in Oregon. Prepared by Brien Sipe July 20, 2006 On behalf of Renewable Energy System Permit Fees in Oregon Prepared by Brien Sipe July 20, 2006 On behalf of Contents 1. Executive Summary... 3 1.1 Key Findings... 4 1.2 Observations... 4 2. Introduction... 5 2.1 Background...

More information

Plumas Sierra Solar Rebate Program Guidebook 2015

Plumas Sierra Solar Rebate Program Guidebook 2015 Plumas Sierra Solar Rebate Program Guidebook 2015 Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative (PSREC) is offering rebates to encourage the installation of high quality solar photovoltaic (PV) systems in 2015.

More information

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. Sacramento Convention Center Room 309. Workshop # 52

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. Sacramento Convention Center Room 309. Workshop # 52 C.A.S.H. 32 ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON SCHOOL FACILITIES YOUR CHALLENGES, YOUR SOLUTIONS, YOUR CONFERENCE! Wednesday, February 23, 2011 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. Sacramento Convention Center Room 309 Workshop

More information

The Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a National Grid

The Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a National Grid The Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a National Grid Rhode Island Renewable Energy Growth Program Solicitation and Enrollment Process Rules for Small-Scale Solar Projects Effective Date: April 1, 2015

More information

Marketing Methodology of Solar PV Power Packs

Marketing Methodology of Solar PV Power Packs Marketing Methodology of Solar PV Power Packs Somasekhar. G, Bharathi.G, and GirijaEureka.M* Department of Management Studies Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science Post Box No: 14, Angallu, Madanapalle-

More information

PV Farms Solar Electric Power for Wholesale Distribution

PV Farms Solar Electric Power for Wholesale Distribution PV Farms Solar Electric Power for Wholesale Distribution UC ENERGY WEEK 2010 California Solar Energy Workshop UC Davis Energy Institute Davis, California Larry Asera Chairman/CEO Asera Group, Inc. May

More information

Solar Benefits Colorado:! Solar & EV made simple!! September 2015

Solar Benefits Colorado:! Solar & EV made simple!! September 2015 Solar Benefits Colorado:! Solar & EV made simple!! September 2015 Perceived Barriers to Solar & EV! Range anxiety High upfront cost Marketing & customer acquisition Customer confusion Information overload

More information

Request for Proposal. Solar Power Purchase Agreement

Request for Proposal. Solar Power Purchase Agreement Request for Proposal Solar Power Purchase Agreement Solicitation The Town of Carbondale, Colorado is soliciting proposals from a qualified Contractor/Vendor to design, fabricate, deliver, install, operate,

More information

February 23, 2016. Paul Helstrom Minnesota Power Renewable Program Lead. Stacy Miller Minnesota Department of Commerce Solar Policy Specialist

February 23, 2016. Paul Helstrom Minnesota Power Renewable Program Lead. Stacy Miller Minnesota Department of Commerce Solar Policy Specialist February 23, 2016 Paul Helstrom Minnesota Power Renewable Program Lead Stacy Miller Minnesota Department of Commerce Solar Policy Specialist Agenda Overview of Solar Energy Markets in the US Overview

More information

Tax Credit Incentives for Residential Solar Photovoltaic in Hawai i

Tax Credit Incentives for Residential Solar Photovoltaic in Hawai i Tax Credit Incentives for Residential Solar Photovoltaic in Hawai i February 11, 2013 The typical residential solar PV investment has an internal rate of return of 9% even without state tax credits. With

More information

Solar and Wind Energy for Greenhouses. A.J. Both 1 and Tom Manning 2

Solar and Wind Energy for Greenhouses. A.J. Both 1 and Tom Manning 2 Solar and Wind Energy for Greenhouses A.J. Both 1 and Tom Manning 2 1 Associate Extension Specialist 2 Project Engineer NJ Agricultural Experiment Station Rutgers University 20 Ag Extension Way New Brunswick,

More information

Combined Heat and Power (CHP) En Banc Hearing October 7, 2014, University of Pittsburgh

Combined Heat and Power (CHP) En Banc Hearing October 7, 2014, University of Pittsburgh Combined Heat and Power (CHP) En Banc Hearing October 7, 2014, University of Pittsburgh Thomas G. Bourgeois Deputy Director (914) 422 4013 tbourgeois@pace.edu CHP in the Northeast States CT, MA, NY recognize

More information

Residential Solar Service Agreement (RSSA) Customer Sited Solar Photovoltaic Systems

Residential Solar Service Agreement (RSSA) Customer Sited Solar Photovoltaic Systems Residential Solar Service Agreement (RSSA) Customer Sited Solar Photovoltaic Systems This Agreement is made and entered into this day of, 20, ( Effective Date ) by and between the Orlando Utilities Commission

More information

African firms identify two major obstacles to business: finance and electricity

African firms identify two major obstacles to business: finance and electricity FINANCING C&I SOLAR INTRODUCTION African firms identify two major obstacles to business: finance and electricity Biggest obstacle to business identified by firms in Sub-Saharan Africa Electricity Access

More information

Renewable Energy Roadmap Overview

Renewable Energy Roadmap Overview Renewable Energy Roadmap Overview Curt Maxey with assistance from many Renewable Energy Roadmap Overview Discussion of renewable resources Electric energy consumption and mandates Utility scale solar Green

More information