Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding."

Transcription

1 UNITED STA TES p A TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO ,304 12/10/2004 Mary J. Bossard SHE /07/2016 NEKT AR THERAPEUTICS 455 Mission Bay Blvd., South, Suite 100 San Francisco, CA EXAMINER FUBARA, BLESSING M ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 1613 MAILDATE DELIVERY MODE 07/07/2016 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)

2 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte MARY J. BOSSARD 1 Appeal Technology Center 1600 Before DONALD E. ADAMS, MELANIE L. McCOLLUM, and ULRIKE W. JENKS, Administrative Patent Judges. McCOLLUM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. 134 involving claims to a composition and to a method for its administration. The Examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated and/or obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. 6(b). We reverse. 1 Appellant identifies the real party in interest as N ektar Therapeutics (Br. 1 ).

3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE Claims 1, 4--36, , 45, 46, 52, and 57 are on appeal (Br. 5; Final Act. 2-3). 2 Claim 1 is illustrative and reads as follows: 1. A composition comprising: a first population of polymer-active agent conjugates, wherein each polymer in the first population of polymer-active agent conjugates has a weight average molecular weight; and a second population of polymer-active agent conjugates, wherein each polymer in the second population of polymer-active agent conjugates has a weight average molecular weight, wherein the weight average molecular weight of each polymer in the first population is in the range of from about 100 Daltons to less than 20,000 Daltons, and the weight average molecular weight of each polymer in the second population is in the range of from greater than 100 Daltons to about 120,000 Daltons, wherein the weight average molecular weight of each polymer in the first population is different from the weight average molecular weight of each polymer in the second population. Claims 1, 21-26, 28-36, 39, 40, 42, 43, 45, 52, and 57 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as anticipated by Nakamura et al. (EP 1,333,036 Al, Aug. 6, 2003) (Ans. 2). Claims 1, 4--20, 22-24, 27, , and 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as obvious over Nakamura (Ans. 3). 1. Nakamura discloses: FINDINGS OF FACT The inventors of the present invention have now prepared a PEGconjugated EPO by reacting recombinant human EPO [( erythropoietin)] with a polyethylene glycol (PEG) derivative having an active ester at one end, such as a methoxy-pegsuccinimidyl lower fatty acid ester. This PEG-conjugated EPO 2 Claims 37, 38, 44, 47-51, and are also pending but have been withdrawn from consideration (Final Act. 1; Br ). 2

4 comprises a composition of conjugates having 1 to 3 linear PEG molecules per rhepo molecule. (Nakamura i-f 13.) (Id. i-f 15.) 2. In addition, Nakamura discloses: [T]he inventors of the present invention further prepared a monomethoxy PEG-EPO (mono-mpeg-epo) conjugate having one linear PEG molecule of 5 kda, 10 kda, 15 kda, 20 kda or 30 kda per native EPO molecule, [and] a di-methoxy PEG-EPO (di-mpeg-epo) conjugate having two linear PEG molecules of 5 kda, 10 kda, 15 kda, 20 kda or 30 kda per native EPO molecule. 3. Nakamura also discloses that the "PEG-conjugated EPO composition... may... comprise... a PEG-conjugated EPO where PEG conjugation occurs on two or more amino acid residues in native EPO" (id.,-r 23). 4. In addition, Nakamura discloses: "The molecular weight of PEG used for conjugation can be changed as appropriate for the degree of sustained efficacy required by the resulting PEG-conjugated EPO, the degree of decreased EPO activity, etc. The molecular weight of one PEG molecule is 5 to 40 kda." (Id. i-f 25.) 5. In particular, Nakamura discloses: EPO... was added to mpeg5k-sp A.... [T]he solution was purified... to collect three potential fractions predominantly rich in mono-mpeg5k-epo, di-mpeg5k-epo and a mixture thereof. Each fraction was concentrated... and subjected... to gel filtration... to separate mono-mpeg5k-epo and dimpeg5k-epo fractions, which were then respectively combined for each conjugate to give mono-mpeg5k-epo... and di-mpeg5k-epo. 3

5 (Id. ii 70.) 6. Nakamura discloses that the following results were obtained: mtmo-mpegma=o-fa~o ds!itptgsmm-e PO 3410:0 3&200 S:J8QO i1400d Hl10=00 (Id. ii 75.) ANTICIPATION The Examiner finds that "Nakamura describes combining the fractions of mono-mpeg5k-epo and di-mpeg5kepo (paragraph [0070]) with the mono- and di-mpeg5k having different average molecular weight by virtue of the mono- and the di -, thus meeting claim 1" (Ans. 2). In particular, the Examiner finds "mono-mpeg5k-epo is a first population and di-mpeg5k EPO is a second population" (id.). Analysis Nakamura discloses a composition comprising a mixture of a monompeg5k-epo and a di-mpeg5k-epo (Finding of Fact (FF) 5). We recognize that the di-mpeg5k-epo would weigh more than the monompeg5k-epo due to the presence of a second PEG (FF 2 & 6). In addition, we are aware of no reason why mono-mpeg5k-epo and dimpeg5k-epo cannot each be considered a polymer. However, neither of these polymers have a weight average molecular weight of from about 100 Daltons to less than 20,000 Daltons (id.), as required by the first population of claim 1. 4

6 Instead, the Examiner appears to be interpreting the term "polymer" in claim 1 to read on only the PEG portion of the conjugate (Ans. 3 & 5---6). We are aware of no reason it is unreasonable to interpret the term "polymer" in claim 1 to refer to the PEG portion of the conjugate. However, we do find it unreasonable to interpret the term "polymer" to refer to two PEG polymers that are separated in a conjugate by an EPO molecule (see FF 3). In addition, the Examiner has not provided any basis to assume that, in the dimpeg5k-epo, a PEG5K attaches to a second PEG5K to form a PEG lok. The Examiner also failed to establish an evidentiary basis on this record to support a finding that Nakamura discloses the use of PEG molecules having two different molecular weights in a single composition. Thus, we agree with Appellant that the Examiner has not set forth a prima facie case that Nakamura discloses first and second populations, wherein the weight average molecular weight of each polymer in the first population is different from the weight average molecular weight of each polymer in the second population. Instead, we agree with Appellant that Nakamura teaches two populations in which each PEG polymer has the same molecular weight (Br. 6), although the di-mpeg5k-epo contains twice the number of PEG polymers per conjugate (FF 1---6). Conclusion The Examiner has not set forth a prima facie case that Nakamura anticipates claim 1. We therefore reverse the anticipation rejection of claim 1 and of claims 21-26, 28-36, 39, 40, 42, 43, 45, 52, and 57, which directly or indirectly depend from claim 1 (Br ). 5

7 OBVIOUSNESS In the obviousness rejection, the Examiner finds that Nakamura anticipates claim 1 (Ans. 3). The Examiner also finds: Nakamura... teaches that the molecular weight of the PEG used can be changed as appropriate for the degree of sustained release efficacy desired for the PEG-EPO conjugate and the degree of activity desired for the EPO; Nakamura suggests that the molecular weight of PEG conjugated EPO in aqueous medium ranges from 100 to 900 kda and the average molecular weight of the PEG is from 5-40kDa. Thus the mixture of mono-mpeg EPO and di-mpeg-epo is an exemplification. Nakamura does not prescribe that the PEG in the second PEG-EPO further added to initial PEG-EPO should have the same molecular weight as that in the first PEG-EPO. What is required in Nakamura is that the molecular weight of the PEG in either the initial PEG-EPO or the further added PEG-EPO be within the range o [ f] 5-40 kda. (Id. at 4.) The Examiner concludes that "it is within the ordinary capabilities of the artisan to use molar amounts of the individual polymer conjugated erythropoietin that would provide the desired sustained activity" (id. at 3). Analysis As noted by the Examiner (Ans. 4), Nakamura discloses a range of PEG molecular weights and exemplifies a molecular weight of 5 kda (FF 4-- 5). We understand that this example teaches a composition containing two populations of conjugates (FF 5). However, the Examiner has not set forth a prima facie case that this composition anticipates claim 1 for the reasons discussed above. In addition, Nakamura discloses that these populations are subsequently separated (id.). We agree with Appellant that the Examiner does not adequately explain why it would have been obvious to instead 6

8 combine populations containing PEG polymers of different molecular weights (Br. 8). Conclusion The Examiner has not set forth a prima facie case that Nakamura suggests the composition of claim 1. We therefore reverse the obviousness rejection of claim 1 and of claims 4--20, 22-24, 27, , and 46, which directly or indirectly depend from claim 1 (Br ). REVERSED 7

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/958,191 10/04/2004 Ruth E. Bauhahn 151P11719USU1 1458

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/958,191 10/04/2004 Ruth E. Bauhahn 151P11719USU1 1458 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.

Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. UNITED STA TES p A TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/001,772 10/31/2001 Anand Subramanian 03485/100H799-US1 4306

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/001,772 10/31/2001 Anand Subramanian 03485/100H799-US1 4306 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 11/751,277 05/21/2007 Larry Bert Brenner AUS920070464US1 1721

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 11/751,277 05/21/2007 Larry Bert Brenner AUS920070464US1 1721 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 11/331,558 01/15/2006 Hui Hu 2713

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 11/331,558 01/15/2006 Hui Hu 2713 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO.

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/748,316 12/30/2003 Jeffrey Robert Roose 1671-0286 8025

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/748,316 12/30/2003 Jeffrey Robert Roose 1671-0286 8025 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO.

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/425,695 04/28/2003 Rajesh John RSTN-031 5202

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/425,695 04/28/2003 Rajesh John RSTN-031 5202 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.

Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. UNITED STA TES p A TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.

Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. UNITED STA TES p A TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 95/002,355 09/14/2012 8181992 104538.

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 95/002,355 09/14/2012 8181992 104538. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 11/335,056 01/18/2006 Richard James Casler JR.

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 11/335,056 01/18/2006 Richard James Casler JR. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 09/982,337 10/18/2001 Todd Ouzts MFCP.

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 09/982,337 10/18/2001 Todd Ouzts MFCP. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte ROBERT WEBER and NISHITH PATEL

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte ROBERT WEBER and NISHITH PATEL UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte ROBERT WEBER and NISHITH PATEL Appeal 2012-002460 Technology Center 1600 Before DONALD E. ADAMS, LORA M. GREEN,

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte BRUCE D. LAWREY, ROBERT F. REBELLO, ROGER DALE LANE and W. BRENT SMITH Appeal 2009-002289 Technology

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/304,776 11/26/2002 Jouni Ylitalo 800.0882.

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/304,776 11/26/2002 Jouni Ylitalo 800.0882. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 11/588,111 10/26/2006 Frank N. Mandigo 6113B-002728/US/COA 1211

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 11/588,111 10/26/2006 Frank N. Mandigo 6113B-002728/US/COA 1211 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte FRANZ LECHNER and HELMUT STEFFENINI

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte FRANZ LECHNER and HELMUT STEFFENINI UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte FRANZ LECHNER and HELMUT STEFFENINI Appeal 2012-012349 1 Technology Center 3700 Before STEFAN STAICOVICI, EDWARD

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte JOEL E. SHORT, FREDERIC DELLY, MARK F. LOGAN, and DANIEL TOOMEY Appeal 2009-002481 1 Technology Center

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte IAN D. FAULKNER, and THOMAS J.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte IAN D. FAULKNER, and THOMAS J. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte IAN D. FAULKNER, and THOMAS J. ROGERS Appeal 2009-002547 Technology Center 3700 Decided: 1 July 1,

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte RUDIGER MUSCH, JAN MAZANEK, HERMANN PERREY, and KNUT PANSKUS Appeal 2009-002558 Technology Center

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte XAVIER DELANNAY, DENNIS J. DUNPHY, FERNANDO GAITAIN-GAITAIN, and THOMAS P. JURY Appeal 2010-002236

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte BRYAN KEITH FELLER and MATTHEW JOSEPH MACURA

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte BRYAN KEITH FELLER and MATTHEW JOSEPH MACURA UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte BRYAN KEITH FELLER and MATTHEW JOSEPH MACURA Appeal 2009-002682 Technology Center 3700 Decided: 1

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte FANG-JWU LIAO

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte FANG-JWU LIAO UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte FANG-JWU LIAO Appeal 2009-002699 Technology Center 2800 Decided: August 7, 2009 Before BEVERLY A.

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte VINCENT HOLTZ and JEAN SIEFFERT

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte VINCENT HOLTZ and JEAN SIEFFERT UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte VINCENT HOLTZ and JEAN SIEFFERT Appeal 2011-005241 Technology Center 3600 Before JAMES P. CALVE, SCOTT A. DANIELS,

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte DWIGHT D. RILEY Appeal 2009-013823 1 Technology Center 2400 Before GREGORY J. GONSALVES, JASON V.

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte MARTIN JAN SOUKUP, ANOOP NANNRA, and MARTIN MEIER

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte MARTIN JAN SOUKUP, ANOOP NANNRA, and MARTIN MEIER 0 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte MARTIN JAN SOUKUP, ANOOP NANNRA, and MARTIN MEIER Appeal 0-00 Application /, Technology Center 00 Before MURRIEL

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte JOHANNES HENRICUS VAN BIJNEN and PETER HUMPHREY DE LA RAMBELJE Appeal 2009-002284 1 Technology Center

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte RICHARD J TITMUSS, CAROLINE AM LEBRE, and JAMES L TAYLOR Appeal 2009-000930 Technology Center 2400

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte CHRISTOPHER JAMES DAWSON, VINCENZO VALENTINO DI LUOFFO, CRIAG WILLIAM FELLENSTEIN, and RICK ALLEN

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte VINOD SHARMA and DANIEL C. SIGG

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte VINOD SHARMA and DANIEL C. SIGG UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte VINOD SHARMA and DANIEL C. SIGG Appeal 2012-000284 Technology Center 1600 Before ERIC GRIMES, FRANCISCO C. PRATS,

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte CHRISTOPHER N. DEL REGNO, HOWARD H. CHIU, DONALD PITCHFORTH, JR., TERRY W. MCGINNIS, and RONALD DENNIS DAY Appeal

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte SHERI L. MCGUIRE, THOMAS E. TAYLOR, and BRIAN EMANUEL Appeal 2009-002177 Technology Center 1700 Decided:

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte JOHN M. GAITONDE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte JOHN M. GAITONDE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte JOHN M. GAITONDE Appeal 2009-002456 Technology Center 1700 Decided: 1 May 27, 2009 Before BRADLEY

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte TATSUO NAKAJIMA, ARITO MATSUI, TAKASHI NISHIMOTO, GO ITOHYA, HAJIME ASAI, and TSUNEO TAKANO Appeal

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte JORDI ALBORNOZ

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte JORDI ALBORNOZ UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte JORDI ALBORNOZ Appeal 2009-012862 Technology Center 3600 Before, JAMES D. THOMAS, ANTON W. FETTING

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte ROBERT PARSONS, WARREN ADELMAN, MICHAEL CHADWICK and ERIC WAGNER Appeal 2012-004664 Technology Center 2400 Before

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte CHRISTOPHER H. ELVING and ARVIND SRINIVASAN

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte CHRISTOPHER H. ELVING and ARVIND SRINIVASAN UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte CHRISTOPHER H. ELVING and ARVIND SRINIVASAN Appeal 2009-007359 1 Technology Center 2400 Decided:

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte KEVIN MUKAI and SHANKAR CHANDRAN

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte KEVIN MUKAI and SHANKAR CHANDRAN UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte KEVIN MUKAI and SHANKAR CHANDRAN Appeal 2009-002624 Technology Center 1700 Decided: 1 June 01, 2009

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte ERIC CASPOLE, JOSEPH COHA, ASHISH KARKARE, YANHUA LI, and VENKATESH RADHAKRISHNAN Appeal 2008-002717

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte NIRMAL MUKUND KARI, SCOTT WILLIAM PETRICK, and CHRISTOPHER UNGER Appeal 2011-002161 Technology Center 2600 Before

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte RONALD W. HALL, DARYL T. BURKHARD, and HARRY B. TAYLOR Appeal 2010-002475 Technology Center 2600

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte GRIGORY L. ARAUZ and STEVEN E.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte GRIGORY L. ARAUZ and STEVEN E. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte GRIGORY L. ARAUZ and STEVEN E. BUCHANAN Appeal 2010-002331 Technology Center 3600 Before: MICHAEL

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte HUBERTUS BUTTNER, MARCUS VAN HEYDEN, MARKUS DEUTEL, and ALFONS VOLLMUTH Appeal 2009-002387 1 Technology

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte BRIAN P. RICE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte BRIAN P. RICE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte BRIAN P. RICE Appeal 2009-002761 Application 11/166,056 Technology Center 2800 Decided: March 25,

More information

IN THE UNITED ST A TES PA TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Blight, et al. Confirmation No.: 1241. Filed: December 13, 2004 Examiner: Welter, Rachael E.

IN THE UNITED ST A TES PA TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Blight, et al. Confirmation No.: 1241. Filed: December 13, 2004 Examiner: Welter, Rachael E. Docket No. 127304.02601 IN THE UNITED ST A TES PA TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE In re Application of: Blight, et al. Confirmation No.: 1241 Serial No. 111010,828 Group Art Unit: 1611 Filed: December 13, 2004

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte KAZUNORI UKIGAWA and HIROKI YAMASHITA

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte KAZUNORI UKIGAWA and HIROKI YAMASHITA UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte KAZUNORI UKIGAWA and HIROKI YAMASHITA Appeal 2009-007620 Technology Center 3600 Decided: November

More information

CANADA Patent Rules as amended by SOR/2007-90

CANADA Patent Rules as amended by SOR/2007-90 CANADA Patent Rules as amended by SOR/2007-90 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SHORT TITLE 2. INTERPRETATION PART I RULES OF GENERAL APPLICATION 3. Fees 3.01 3.02 3.1 4. 5. Communications 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Entry

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte XINTIAN MING and STEPHEN J.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte XINTIAN MING and STEPHEN J. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte XINTIAN MING and STEPHEN J. ROTHENBURGER Appeal 2010-002172 Technology Center 1700 Before CHUNG K.

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/900,831 07/28/2004 Thomas R. Schrunk 5038.

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/900,831 07/28/2004 Thomas R. Schrunk 5038. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte ELIZABETH G. PAVEL, MARK N. KAWAGUCHI, and JAMES S. PAPANU Appeal 2009-002463 Technology Center 1700

More information

PATENT LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR PEGYLATED INTERFERON ALFA 2A & 2B

PATENT LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR PEGYLATED INTERFERON ALFA 2A & 2B PATENT LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR PEGYLATED INTERFERON ALFA 2A & 2B February 2013 Initiative for Medicines, Access & Knowledge (I- MAK) 432 Park Avenue South, 4 th Floor, New York, New York, 10016, USA Tel:

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte KEITH C. HONG, HUSNU M. KALKANOGLU, and MING L. SHIAO Appeal 2009-005841 Technology Center 1700 Decided:

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte AMITAVA SENGUPTA, LINUS I. HOLSTEIN, and E. WAYNE BOULDIN Appeal 2009-002199 Technology Center 1700

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte GEORGE LIN

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte GEORGE LIN UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte GEORGE LIN Appeal 2009-002331 Technology Center 3700 Decided: 1 June 18, 2009 Before WILLIAM F. PATE,

More information

Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Ethics and Computing Chapter 8 Summer 2001 CSE 4317: Intellectual Property 1 Motivation Most new ideas in the computer field involve intellectual property Intellectual property must

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte B. REILLY BARRY, MARK A. CHODORONEK, ERIC DEROSE, CAROL Y. DEVINE, MARK N. STUDNESS, ANGELA R. JAMES,

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte PHILIP KNEISL, LAWRENCE A. BEHRMANN, and BRENDEN M. GROVE Appeal 2010-002777 Technology Center 3600

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte NOEL WAYNE ANDERSON

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte NOEL WAYNE ANDERSON UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte NOEL WAYNE ANDERSON Appeal 2010-002383 Technology Center 2100 Before ALLEN R. MacDONALD, ROBERT E.

More information

Maine Cernota & Rardin, Registered Patent Attorneys 547 Amherst St., 3 rd Floor, Nashua, NH 03063 603-886-6100 info@mcr-ip.com

Maine Cernota & Rardin, Registered Patent Attorneys 547 Amherst St., 3 rd Floor, Nashua, NH 03063 603-886-6100 info@mcr-ip.com Glossary of IP Terms Term Abstract of the Disclosure (AKA Abstract) America Invents Act (AKA the AIA) Application (patent) Application Number (patent) Assignment Claims Continuation in Part (CIP) Definition

More information

COMMENTARY. Amending Patent Claims in Inter Partes Review Proceedings

COMMENTARY. Amending Patent Claims in Inter Partes Review Proceedings SEPTEMBER 2015 COMMENTARY Amending Patent Claims in Inter Partes Review Proceedings The inter partes review ( IPR ) statute authorizes a patent owner ( PO ) to file, after an IPR has been instituted, one

More information

Why is FTO important?

Why is FTO important? Antibodies, Patents and Freedom to Operate: The Monoclonal Maze Timothy J. Shea, Jr. Director Tracy Muller Associate Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 4 th Annual Antibody Therapeutics Conference

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Appellant v. GOOGLE, INC., Appellee 2014-1351 Appeal from the United States Patent

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte MARTIN FREEBORN and VINCE BURKHART

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Ex parte MARTIN FREEBORN and VINCE BURKHART UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte MARTIN FREEBORN and VINCE BURKHART Appeal 2013-002790 1 Technology Center 1700 Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, ROMULO

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit IN RE: HANI KAYYALI, CRAIG A. FREDERICK, CHRISTIAN MARTIN, ROBERT N. SCHMIDT, BRIAN M. KOLKOWSKI, Appellants

More information

PATENTS ACT 1977. IN THE MATTER OF Application No. GB 9808661.4 in the name of Pintos Global Services Ltd DECISION. Introduction

PATENTS ACT 1977. IN THE MATTER OF Application No. GB 9808661.4 in the name of Pintos Global Services Ltd DECISION. Introduction PATENTS ACT 1977 IN THE MATTER OF Application No. GB 9808661.4 in the name of Pintos Global Services Ltd DECISION Introduction 1. Patent application number GB 9808661.4 entitled, A system for exchanging

More information

The USPTO: Patent Application and Examination Processes

The USPTO: Patent Application and Examination Processes The USPTO: Patent Application and Examination Processes Ram Shukla Supervisory Patent Examiner 571-272-0735 Ram.shukla@uspto.gov Jeanne Clark Patent Examination Policy Advisor, MPEP 571-272-7714 Jeanne.Clark@uspto.gov

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte DIANE K. STEWART, J. DAVID CASEY, JR., JOHN BEATY, CHRISTIAN R. MUSIL, STEVEN BERGER, SYBREN J. SIJBRANDIJ,

More information

IB Chemistry 1 Mole. One atom of C-12 has a mass of 12 amu. One mole of C-12 has a mass of 12 g. Grams we can use more easily.

IB Chemistry 1 Mole. One atom of C-12 has a mass of 12 amu. One mole of C-12 has a mass of 12 g. Grams we can use more easily. The Mole Atomic mass units and atoms are not convenient units to work with. The concept of the mole was invented. This was the number of atoms of carbon-12 that were needed to make 12 g of carbon. 1 mole

More information

Introduction to Patents. Angela Lyon, MSc, Registered Patent Agent (US & CA)

Introduction to Patents. Angela Lyon, MSc, Registered Patent Agent (US & CA) Introduction to Patents Angela Lyon, MSc, Registered Patent Agent (US & CA) What is a Patent Agent? Patent Attorney? Scientific Education and Good Writing Skills Bachelor of Science & Law degrees; and

More information

SANTA CLARA COUNTY COUNSEL CITY ATTORNEY OF SAN FRANCISCO NEWS RELEASE

SANTA CLARA COUNTY COUNSEL CITY ATTORNEY OF SAN FRANCISCO NEWS RELEASE Media Contacts: SANTA CLARA COUNTY COUNSEL CITY ATTORNEY OF SAN FRANCISCO NEWS RELEASE Miguel Márquez County Counsel Phone: (408) 299-5902 County of Santa Clara Office of the County Counsel 70 W. Hedding

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte LUCAS SAXE and PATRICK DOUGLAS

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte LUCAS SAXE and PATRICK DOUGLAS UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte LUCAS SAXE and PATRICK DOUGLAS Appeal 2005-002600 Technology Center 3600 Decided: April 6, 2010 Before

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit EDWARD TOBINICK, Appellant, v. KJELL OLMARKER AND BJORN RYDEVIK, Appellees. 2013-1499 Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte HEATHER E. MCCULLOH, PATRICK MCCARTHY, STEVEN J. ADLER, and HENRY G. PROSACK, JR. Appeal 2009-002258

More information

Trials@uspto.gov Paper 26 571-272-7822 Date: June 11, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Trials@uspto.gov Paper 26 571-272-7822 Date: June 11, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Trials@uspto.gov Paper 26 571-272-7822 Date: June 11, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD IDLE FREE SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner, v. BERGSTROM, INC. Patent

More information

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) (PCT) Done at Washington on June 19, 1970, amended on September 28, 1979, modified on February 3, 1984, and on October 3, 2001 Editor s Note: For details concerning amendments and modifications to the

More information

Regulations for the Doctor Philosophiae (dr. philos.) degree at NHH

Regulations for the Doctor Philosophiae (dr. philos.) degree at NHH Regulations for the Doctor Philosophiae (dr. philos.) degree at NHH Adopted by the Executive Board of NHH on 16 October 2003. Changed by the Executive Board on 8 December 2005 pursuant to Act of 1 April

More information

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO.

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. NOTICE Pursuant to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Standard Operating Procedure 2, the PTAB designates the Decision on Appeal in Ex parte Mewherter (Appeal 2012-007692) Precedential as to the

More information

European Patenting Practice... with a view on USPTO Differences. Michael Schneider European Patent Attorney Eversheds, Munich

European Patenting Practice... with a view on USPTO Differences. Michael Schneider European Patent Attorney Eversheds, Munich European Patenting Practice... with a view on USPTO Differences Michael Schneider European Patent Attorney Eversheds, Munich »Patents add the fuel of interest to the fire of genius«abraham Lincoln 2 Overview

More information

CASE 0:11-cv-00412-MJD-FLN Document 96 Filed 07/11/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:11-cv-00412-MJD-FLN Document 96 Filed 07/11/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:11-cv-00412-MJD-FLN Document 96 Filed 07/11/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re Mirapex Products Liability Litigation Case No. 07-MD-1836 (MJD/FLN) This document

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO) PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter US Page 1 US UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO) AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL PHASE SUMMARY

More information

Consolidated Patent Rules - November 2015 Update

Consolidated Patent Rules - November 2015 Update Consolidated Patent Rules - November 2015 Update Title 37 - Code of Federal Regulations Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights CHAPTER I UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SUBCHAPTER

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte JOHN N. GROSS

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte JOHN N. GROSS UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte JOHN N. GROSS Appeal 2009-002646 Technology Center 3600 Decided: September 29, 2009 Before, MURRIEL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF ) TECHNOLOGY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) 15-10374-FDS ) MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ) APPLE, INC.; ELPIDA

More information

Norway Advokatfirmaet Grette

Norway Advokatfirmaet Grette This text first appeared in the IAM magazine supplement Patents in Europe 2008 April 2008 Norway By Amund Brede Svendsen and Svein Ruud Johansen, Advokatfirmaet Grette, Oslo 1. What options are open to

More information

U. S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE

U. S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE U. S. TRADEMARK LAW FEDERAL STATUTES U. S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE November 25, 2013-1- November 25, 2013 TRADEMARK ACT OF 1946, AS AMENDED TITLE I - THE PRINCIPAL REGISTER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 (15 U.S.C.

More information

AUTHENTICATION AND PRESERVATION OF STATE ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIALS ACT

AUTHENTICATION AND PRESERVATION OF STATE ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIALS ACT D R A F T FOR DISCUSSION ONLY AUTHENTICATION AND PRESERVATION OF STATE ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIALS ACT NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS March, 0 Committee Meeting Draft Without

More information

Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation

Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation by charlene m. morrow and dargaye churnet 1. Who enforces a patent? The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office grants a patent. Contrary to popular belief, a patent

More information

CHAPTER 8: CHEMICAL COMPOSITION

CHAPTER 8: CHEMICAL COMPOSITION CHAPTER 8: CHEMICAL COMPOSITION Active Learning: 1-4, 6-8, 12, 18-25; End-of-Chapter Problems: 3-4, 9-82, 84-85, 87-92, 94-104, 107-109, 111, 113, 119, 125-126 8.2 ATOMIC MASSES: COUNTING ATOMS BY WEIGHING

More information

Scuola di dottorato in Scienze molecolari Information literacy in chemistry 2015. Patents

Scuola di dottorato in Scienze molecolari Information literacy in chemistry 2015. Patents Patents a patent is a right granted by a government to an inventor for a limited time inventions become public domain after 20 years to be patentable an invention must meet the following criteria: usefulness:

More information

6 Characterization of Casein and Bovine Serum Albumin

6 Characterization of Casein and Bovine Serum Albumin 6 Characterization of Casein and Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) Objectives: A) To separate a mixture of casein and bovine serum albumin B) to characterize these proteins based on their solubilities as a function

More information

Nanotechnology-Related Issues at the United States Patent and Trademark Office

Nanotechnology-Related Issues at the United States Patent and Trademark Office Nanotechnology-Related Issues at the United States Patent and Trademark Office Charles R. Eloshway Patent Attorney, Office of International Relations USPTO 571-272-9300 Charles.Eloshway@uspto.gov 1 USPTO

More information