Contents. Acknowledgments
|
|
|
- Basil Sutton
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Contents Foreword Acknowledgments vii xiii Chapter 1: The Federal Government As A Civil Litigant THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS A PRIMARY ACTOR BEFORE THE CIVIL COURTS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (a) Introduction: Centralized Control Of Federal Government Litigation (b) The Attorney General And Centralized Litigation Authority (c) The Structure Of The Department Of Justice (d) The Litigating Divisions (d)(1) Introduction To The Litigating Divisions (d)(2) The Environment And Natural Resources Division (d)(3) The Civil Division (e) The United States Attorneys (f) The Solicitor General THE GOVERNMENT LAWYER: NATURE OF WORK, THE GOVERNMENT CLIENT AND PUBLIC INTEREST, AND ETHICS (a) The Nature Of The Government Lawyer s Work (b) The Government As Client, The Public Interest, And The Moral Conscience Of The Government Lawyer 20 xix
2 xx Litigation With The Federal Government 1.03(c) The Ethical Responsibilities Of The Government Litigator THE PRIVATE PRACTITIONER AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND JUSTICIABILITY SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DISCOVERY AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (a) Introduction: How Discovery Is The Same And How It Is Different With The Federal Government (b) General Rules Of Discovery And The Federal Government (c) Availability Of The Freedom Of Information Act To Obtain Information For Civil Litigation (d) Federal Government Privileges And Work Product Protection (d)(1) Introduction To Federal Government Privileges (d)(2) Executive Communication Privileges (d)(3) State Secrets Doctrine (d)(4) Other Government Privileges (e) Work Product Protection THE GENERAL RULE OF NO JURY TRIALS IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CIVIL CASES SETTLEMENT OF GOVERNMENT CASES (a) Negotiating Settlement With The Federal Government (a)(1) Frequency Of Settlement Of Government Cases (a)(2) Likely Outcome Of Case And Costs As Considerations In Settlement (a)(3) Special Governmental Considerations In Settlement (a)(4) Initiating Settlement Discussion And Offer (a)(5) Internal Settlement Approval Process 57
3 Contents xxi 1.09(b) Government Authority To Settle (b)(1) Allocation Of Settlement Authority In Department Of Justice (b)(2) Unauthorized Settlements Are Unenforceable (b)(3) Court Settlement Conferences And Settlement Authority (c) The Federal Government And Alternative Dispute Resolution (d) Payment By The Government After Settlement PAYMENT OF JUDGMENTS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES AND INTEREST ON JUDGMENTS (a) The Judgment Fund For Payment Of Final Judgments (b) Setoff Against Judgment For Debts To United States (c) Interest On Judgments Against The Federal Government 70 Chapter 2: The Doctrine Of Federal Sovereign Immunity INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY THE HISTORY OF FEDERAL SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY (a) The Early Historical Origins Of Federal Sovereign Immunity In The United States (b) The Evolution Of The Doctrine Of Federal Sovereign Immunity In The Supreme Court (b)(1) Introduction To Federal Sovereign Immunity In The Supreme Court (b)(2) United States v. Lee (b)(3) Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp (b)(4) Malone v. Bowdoin (b)(5) Summary Of The Current Doctrine Of Sovereign Immunity And Direct Officer Suits 88
4 xxii Litigation With The Federal Government 2.03 JUDICIAL CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTORY WAIVERS OF FEDERAL SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY 93 Chapter 3: Specific Statutory Waivers Of Sovereign Immunity CATEGORIZATION OF STATUTORY WAIVERS OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY: SPECIFIC AND GENERAL 101 Part A: The Federal Tort Claims Act INTRODUCTION TO THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT PREREQUISITES TO SUIT UNDER THE FTCA (a) The Administrative Claim Requirement (a)(1) Nature, Purpose, And Timing Of The Administrative Claim (a)(2) Presenting The Claim To The Appropriate Federal Agency (a)(3) Proper Notice In The Administrative Claim (a)(4) Statement Of Sum-Certain Amount Of Damages (a)(5) Evidence Of Authorization To Represent Claimant (b) The Two-Year Statute Of Limitations (b)(1) General Statute Of Limitations Rule (b)(2) The Discovery Rule (b)(3) Tolling Of FTCA Statute Of Limitations COMMENCEMENT OF SUIT UNDER THE FTCA (a) Timing Of FTCA Action (b) Jurisdiction And Venue In FTCA Suit (c) United States As Proper Party In FTCA Action (d) Joining Non-Federal Parties To FTCA Suit (e) Third-Party Claims And Counterclaims STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LIABILITY UNDER THE FTCA (a) Outline Of Elements For Imposing Liability Under The FTCA 124
5 Contents xxiii 3.05(b) The State Law Liability Standard (b)(1) Identifying The State And Choice Of Law Rules (b)(2) Excluding Federal Law As The Basis For FTCA Claims (c) The Private Person Analogy (c)(1) The Private Person Analogy: Liability And Limitation (c)(2) Indian Towing v. United States: Liability Under Like Circumstances (c)(3) The Private Person Analogy In The Lower Federal Courts (c)(4) The Good Samaritan Doctrine In The Context Of Government Regulation (d) Liability For Wrongful Acts Or Omissions (Excluding Strict Liability) (e) The Scope-Of-Employment Requirement EXCEPTIONS TO LIABILITY UNDER THE FTCA (a) Introduction To FTCA Exceptions (b) The Discretionary Function Exception (b)(1) Introduction To The Discretionary Function Exception (b)(2) Dalehite v. United States (b)(3) United States v. Varig Airlines (b)(4) Berkovitz v. United States (b)(5) United States v. Gaubert And The Current State Of The Law (c) The Misrepresentation Exception (d) The Intentional Tort Exception (d)(1) Introduction To The Intentional Tort Exception (d)(2) The Breadth Of The Intentional Tort Exception (d)(3) The Intentional Tort Exception And Claims For Negligent Hiring, Training, Or Supervision 161
6 xxiv Litigation With The Federal Government 3.06(e) The Foreign Country Exception (f) Other Exceptions To The FTCA DAMAGES UNDER THE FTCA CLAIMANTS EXCLUDED FROM RECOVERY UNDER THE FTCA (a) Introduction On Eligible Claimants Under The FTCA (b) Exclusion Of Federal Civilian Employees Injured On The Job (Federal Employees Compensation Act) (b)(1) Federal Employees Compensation Act Is Exclusive Remedy For Injuries On The Job (b)(2) General Unreviewability Of Secretary s Determinations Under The Federal Employees Compensation Act (b)(3) Stating The Problem: The Interrelationship Of The Federal Employees Compensation Act And The Federal Tort Claims Act (b)(4) Judicial Management Of The Intersection Of The Federal Employees Compensation Act And The Federal Tort Claims Act (b)(5) Advising clients Regarding Claims Under The Federal Employees Compensation Act And The Federal Tort Claims Act (c) Exclusion off Military Servicemembers Injured Incident To Service (The Feres Doctrine) (c)(1) Introduction To The Feres Doctrine (c)(2) Feres v. United States: Creation Of The Doctrine (c)(3) United States v. Johnson: Feres Revisited And Reaffirmed (c)(4) Feres, The FTCA, And The Veterans Benefits Act 182
7 Contents xxv 3.08(c)(5) The Meaning Of Incident To Service And The Scope Of The Feres Doctrine (c)(6) A Critique Of The Feres Doctrine And The Current State Of The Law 186 Part B: The Suits In Admiralty Act MARITIME CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES: THE SUITS IN ADMIRALTY ACT THE JURISDICTIONAL SCOPE OF THE SUITS IN ADMIRALTY ACT, THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT, AND THE PUBLIC VESSELS ACT IMPLYING THE DISCRETIONARY FUNCTION EXCEPTION INTO THE SUITS IN ADMIRALTY ACT 192 Part C: Employment Discrimination Claims FEDERAL SECTOR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION STATUTES TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF THE AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION 198 Part D: Open Government And Privacy Laws OPEN GOVERNMENT AND PRIVACY LAWS (a) The Freedom Of Information Act (b) The Privacy Act (c) The Government-In-The-Sunshine Act 202 Part E: The Social Security Act DISABILITY LITIGATION UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 202 Part F: Environmental Protection Statutes SUITS AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATUTES 205 Part G: The Veterans Benefits Act THE VETERANS BENEFITS ACT 208 Part H: The Religious Freedom Restoration Act 213
8 xxvi Litigation With The Federal Government 3.20 THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT 213 Part I: The Patent And Copyright Infringement Act THE PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT ACT 215 Part J: Agencies With Sue-And-Be-Sued Clauses And Government Corporations AGENCIES WITH SUE-AND-BE-SUED CLAUSES GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS EXCEPTIONS TO SCOPE OF SUE-AND-BE-SUED CLAUSES 222 Chapter 4: General Statutory Waivers Of Sovereign Immunity CATEGORIZATION OF STATUTORY WAIVERS OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY: SPECIFIC AND GENERAL 225 Part A: The Tucker Act And Related Non-Tort Money Claims TRIAL COURT JURISDICTION THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (a) The United States Court Of Federal Claims (a)(1) The Origins Of The Court Of Claims (a)(2) The Modern Reconstitution Of The Court Of Claims Into The Court Of Federal Claims (a)(3) The Article I Status Of The Court Of Federal Claims (a)(4) The Varied Jurisdiction Of The Court Of Federal Claims (b) The Tucker Act As A Jurisdictional Statute (c) Concurrent Little Tucker Act Jurisdiction Of The United States District Court (d) Section 1500 And Claims Pending Simultaneously In The Court Of Federal Claims And Another Court (d)(1) Introducing The Problem Of Simultaneous Pending Claims In Different Courts 239
9 Contents xxvii 4.02(d)(2) The Origin Of Section 1500 As The Response To A Peculiar Historical Problem (d)(3) Section 1500 And The Prior-Filed Suit Scenario (d)(4) Section 1500 And The Later-Filed Suit Scenario (d)(5) Defining The Same Claim For Purposes Of Section (d)(6) Proposals To Repeal Section (e) Relief Available Under the The Tucker Act And In The Court Of Federal Claims (f) Six-Year Statute Of Limitations For Claims In The Court Of Federal Claims (g) Counterclaims By The Government In The Court Of Federal Claims APPELLATE JURISDICTION THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT (a) The Historical Origin And Nature Of The Federal Circuit (b) The Federal Circuit s General And Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Tucker Act Appeals (c) The Federal Circuit s Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Appeals In Mixed Cases With Both Little Tucker Act And Other Claims (d) The Federal Circuit s Non-Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Appeals From Final District Court Judgments In Disguised Big Tucker Act Cases (e) The Federal Circuit s Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Interlocutory Appeals From District Courts In Disguised Big Tucker Act Cases (f) The Federal Circuit s Appellate Jurisdiction Over Non-Tucker Act Matters THE TUCKER ACT AND STATUTORY MONEY CLAIMS (a) The Tucker Act As A Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity For Money Claims 256
10 xxviii Litigation With The Federal Government 4.04(b) The Requirement Of A Money-Mandating Provision For Tucker Act Claims Founded Upon Statute CIVILIAN EMPLOYMENT CLAIMS (a) The Tucker Act As The Former Means For Judicial Review Of Civilian Employment Claims (b) The Civil Service Reform Act As The Exclusive Means For Judicial Review Of Most Civilian Employment Claims (c) The Back Pay Act And Judicial Review Of Personnel Actions (d) Civilian Employment Matters Outside The Exclusive Coverage Of The Civil Service Reform Act MILITARY EMPLOYMENT CLAIMS (a) Military Pay Act Claims Under The Tucker Act (b) The Availability Of The Administrative Procedure Act As An Alternative To The Tucker Act For Relief In Military Employment Cases INDIAN MONEY CLAIMS (a) Indian Claims, The Tucker Act, And The Indian Tucker Act (b) The Mitchell Decisions (c) The Navajo Nation And White Mountain Apache Decisions (c)(1) The Navajo Nation Decision (c)(2) The White Mountain Apache Decision (d) The Role Of The Indian Trust Doctrine In Inferring A Substantive Right To Monetary Relief (e) Factors In Finding An Actionable Indian Trust Relationship (e)(1) Express Statutory Denomination Of Trust (e)(2) Role Of Trust Relationship And General Common Law Of Trust (e)(3) Control Of Indian Resources By Government 292
11 Contents xxix 4.07(e)(4) The Counter-Factor Of A Statutory Purpose To Encourage Indian Self-Determination (f) Indian Trust Claims Outside Of The Tucker Act THE TUCKER ACT, THE CONTRACT DISPUTES ACT, AND CONTRACT CLAIMS (a) Introduction To Government Contract Claims (b) The Contract Disputes Act (b)(1) Scope Of The Contract Disputes Act (b)(2) Administrative Submission Of A Claim Under The Contract Disputes Act (b)(3) Review By The Court Of Federal Claims Or The Board Of Contract Appeals (b)(4) Relief Available Under The Contract Disputes Act And The Bar On Specific Performance (b)(5) Bid Protest Litigation (c) Contracts Outside The Scope Of The Contract Disputes Act (d) Implied Contracts Under The Tucker Act (e) Governing Law For Federal Contracts (f) The Sovereign Acts Doctrine Or Defense THE TUCKER ACT CLAIMS FOUNDED UPON THE CONSTITUTION (a) Introduction To Constitutional Claims Under The Tucker Act (b) Fifth Amendment Takings Claims Under The Tucker Act (c) Other Constitutional Claims Under The Tucker Act 330 Part B: The Administrative Procedure Act And Claims For Specific Relief 331
12 xxx Litigation With The Federal Government 4.10 THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT (a) Introduction To The Administrative Procedure Act (b) The History Of Sovereign Immunity And The Administrative Procedure Act (c) Judicial Review Under The Administrative Procedure Act 335 Part C: The Relationship Between The Administrative Procedure Act And The Tucker Act THE UNEASY BORDER BETWEEN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT AND THE TUCKER ACT BLURRING THE LINES: THE SUPREME COURT S DECISION IN BOWEN v. MASSACHUSETTS (a) The Supreme Court s Decision In Bowen v. Massachusetts (b) A Summary Of The Critique And The Impact Of Bowen v. Massachusetts RECENT JUDICIAL CLARIFICATIONS REGARDING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT AND THE TUCKER ACT (a) Supreme Court Decisions After Bowen v. Massachusetts (b) Federal Circuit Decisions After Bowen v. Massachusetts 346 Chapter 5: Suits Against Federal Officers Or Employees INTRODUCTION TO SUITS AGAINST FEDERAL OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES 353 Part A: Suits Far Specific Or Equitable-Type Relief Against Federal Officers NON-STATUTORY SUITS AGAINST FEDERAL OFFICERS THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT MANDAMUS 357
13 Contents xxxi Part B: Suits For Damages Against Federal Officers INTRODUCTION TO SUIT FOR DAMAGES AGAINST FEDERAL OFFICERS COMMON-LAW CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AND IMMUNITY OF FEDERAL OFFICERS (a) Common-Law Claims Against Federal Officers (b) Judicial Precursors To Immunity For Federal Officers From Common-Law Suits (c) Statutory Immunity For Federal Officers From Common-Law Suits (The Westfall Act) (c)(1) Introduction To The Westfall Act (c)(2) The Legal Effect Of Officer Immunity And Substitution Of The United States As Defendant (c)(3) Attorney General Certification And Judicial Review Of Scope Of Employment (c)(4) Governing Law And Factual Determination Of Scope Of Employment Question (c)(5) Removal To Federal Court In Westfall Act Cases (c)(6) Exceptions To Westfall Act Immunity CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AGAINST FEDERAL OFFICERS BIVENS SUITS (a) Introduction To Constitutional Damages Claims (b) Judicial Implication Of A Cause Of Action For Damages For Constitutional Violations Against Federal Officers Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents (c) Limitations On Implying A Cause Of Action For Damages For Constitutional Violations (d) Immunity Of Federal Officers Against Constitutional Suits For Damages (d)(1) Introduction To Immunity In Bivens Cases 382
14 xxxii Litigation With The Federal Government 5.07(d)(2) Adoption And Definition Of Qualified Immunity For Federal Officers Against Constitutional Suits For Damages (d)(3) Determining The Objective Reasonableness Of Official Conduct For Qualified Immunity Purposes (d)(4) Resolving The Qualified Immunity Question At Early Stage (e) Representation Of Federal Officers Against Constitutional Claims (f) Implying A Constitutional Claim For Damages Against The United States (g) The Choice Between Imposing Liability On The Employee And Imposing Liability Upon The Government For Constitutional Violations 394 Chapter 6: Binding The Federal Government 399 Part A: Unauthorized Representations By Government Employees Equitable Estoppel INTRODUCTION TO THE QUESTION OF EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST ESTOPPEL OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE PROHIBITION ON ESTOPPEL OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN STATUTORY MONEY CASES A CRITIQUE OF GOVERNMENTAL ESTOPPEL LAW THE CONTINUED AVAILABILITY OF ESTOPPEL AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT? 407 Part B: Prior Adjudication: Preclusion And Stare Decisis INTRODUCTION TO PRIOR ADJUDICATION AND PRECLUSION THE UNAVAILABILITY OF NONMUTUAL PRECLUSION AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT 411
15 Contents xxxiii 6.08 PRECLUSION AND SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY STARE DECISIS AND GOVERNMENTAL NONACQUIESCENCE IN LOWER COURT PRECEDENT 418 Chapter 7: Attorney s Fees: Limitations And Awards INTRODUCTION TO ATTORNEY S FEES IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT LITIGATION 427 Part A: Limitations On Private Attorney s Fee Contracts In Federal Government Cases INTRODUCTION TO LIMITATIONS ON FEE CONTRACTS LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY S FEES IN FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT CASES (a) The Basic Statutory Limitation On Fees (b) Calculating The Fee When Recovery Involves Future Payments Or Non-Monetary Benefits LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY S FEES IN SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS CASES (a) The Purpose Of The Limitation On Fees And Judicial Review (b) The Previous Debate On Proper Measurement Of Fees (c) The Supreme Court s Standard For Measuring Fees (d) Refunding the The Contingency Fee To The Client In Fee-Shifting Situations 434 Part B: Awards Of Attorney s Fees In Federal Government Cases INTRODUCTION TO FEE-SHIFTING IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CASES SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND THE AMERICAN RULE ON ATTORNEY S FEES BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR AWARDING ATTORNEY S FEES (a) Introduction To Awards Of Attorney s Fees (b) Eligibility For A Fee Award Prevailing Party Status 438
16 xxxiv Litigation With The Federal Government 7.07(c) Entitlement To A Fee Award (d) Measurement Of A Fee Award (d)(1) The Road To The Lodestar Approach (d)(2) The Lodestar Hours Reasonably Expended (d)(3) The Lodestar A Reasonable Hourly Rate (d)(4) Upward Adjustments To The Lodestar (Multipliers) (d)(5) Downward Departures Based Upon Degree Of Success (d)(6) Compensation For Delay In Receipt Of Fees (d)(7) Fees For Fees (e) Calculation Of Fees In Federal Government Cases (f) Timing And Procedure For Fee Applications ATTORNEY S FEE AWARDS IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT (a) Fee Awards Under Title VII Of The Civil Rights Act Of (b) Fee Awards Under Age Discrimination In Employment Act (c) Fee Awards In Disability Discrimination Cases ATTORNEY S FEE AWARDS UNDER OPEN GOVERNMENT AND PRIVACY LAWS (a) Availability Of Fees (b) Eligibility For A Fee Award (c) Entitlement to To A Fee Award ATTORNEY S FEE AWARDS UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATUTES (a) Introduction To Awards Of Fees Under Environmental Statutes (b) Awards Of Fees As Appropriate And The Prevailing Requirement 468
17 Contents xxxv 7.10(c) Awards Of Fees As Appropriate And The Catalyst Theory (d) Awards Of Fees In Environmental Cases Against The Government (e) Concluding Thoughts On Success In Environmental Cases THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (a) History, Purposes, And Overview Of The Equal Access To Justice Act (a)(1) Introduction To The EAJA (a)(2) Legislative History Of The EAJA (a)(3) Overview Of The EAJA (a)(4) Purposes Of The EAJA (b) EAJA Subsection (b) General Waiver For Fees (b)(1) Subsection (b) As A General Waiver For Fees (b)(2) Common-Law Fee-Shifting Awards (b)(3) Statutory Fee-Shifting Awards (c) EAJA Subsection (d) Fees For Unreasonable Government Conduct (c)(1) Subsection (d) Scope (c)(2) Subsection (d) Eligibility For A Fee Award (c)(3) Subsection (d) Entitlement To A Fee Award (Substantial Justification Standard) (c)(4) Subsection (d) Measurement Of Fee (Rate Ceiling) (c)(5) Subsection (d) Measurement Of Fee (Cost Of Living Adjustment) (c)(6) Subsection (d) Measurement Of Fee (Special Factor Enhancement) (c)(7) Subsection (d) Timing Of Application For Fees 500
18 xxxvi Litigation With The Federal Government Chapter 8: The United States As Plaintiff INTRODUCTION TO THE UNITED STATES AS PLAINTIFF 503 Part A: Power To Sue GOVERNMENT POWER TO FILE SUIT: GENERALLY THE POWER OF THE UNITED STATES TO SUE IN THE ABSENCE OF STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION (a) Whether The United States Has Inherent Power To Sue (b) United States v. City Of Philadelphia (c) Other Decisions Denying Inherent Power To Sue (d) In re Estelle (e) Scholarly Commentary On Government Power To Sue RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: GOVERNMENT SUITS AGAINST TOBACCO AND FIREARMS MANUFACTURERS (a) The Power To Sue Controversy Continues (b) The Federal Government s Lawsuit Against Tobacco Companies (c) The Federal Government Declines To Sue Handgun Manufacturers DEBT COLLECTION CIVIL FORFEITURE CLAIMS BY THE UNITED STATES (a) Civil Forfeiture As A Special Example Of The United States As Plaintiff (b) The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act Of (c) Forfeiture, Notice, Contest, Pleading, And Judicial Review (d) Burden Of Proof On Government To Justify Forfeiture (e) The Innocent Owner Defense 523
19 Contents xxxvii 8.06(f) Right To Legal Counsel In Forfeiture Cases (g) Remedies To Successful Claimants 524 Part B: Time Limitations Statute Of Limitations And Laches INTRODUCTION TO TIME LIMITATIONS ON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EXPRESS STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS ON GOVERNMENT SUITS TIME LIMITATIONS ON GOVERNMENT SUITS IN THE ABSENCE OF A FEDERAL STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS THE APPLICABILITY OF THE EQUITABLE DOCTRINE OF LACHES TO THE UNITED STATES TIME LIMITATIONS WHEN THE GOVERNMENT IS ASSIGNED PRIVATE RIGHTS OR ACTS IN A NON-SOVEREIGN CAPACITY 531 Part C: Counterclaims Against The United States WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY NECESSARY FOR COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST UNITED STATES SET-OFFS AGAINST UNITED STATES 536 Table Of Cases 539 Table Of Statutes 565 Table Of Books And Journals 579 Index Of Subjects 597
20
Contents. About This Book How To Use This Book Foreword Acknowledgments About the Author
Contents About This Book How To Use This Book Foreword Acknowledgments About the Author vii ix xi xiii xv Chapter 1 Initial Client Engagement 5 Topical Index 1 1.01 Nature of Federal Tax Law 5 1.02 Role
TITLE 2 - RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER 2-2 CIVIL ACTIONS, LIMITATIONS AND LIABILITY CIVIL ACTIONS
TITLE 2 - RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER 2-2 2-2-1 Availability of Civil Actions CIVIL ACTIONS (a) Civil actions are those causes, within the jurisdiction of the Tribal Court, originating in: (1) Tribal law,
Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark
Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark Section I Summary of findings There is no special legislation concerning damages for breach of EC or national competition law in Denmark,
LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001
1 LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE OBJECTIVES OF THE LEGISLATION The purpose of this Bill is to address the impact of the decision of the High
TABLE OF CONTENTS INSURANCE BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN COLORADO. Exhibit 1A Bad Faith Case Outcomes 2.1 INSURED S REMEDIES LIMITED UNDER CONTRACT LAW
TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 INSURANCE BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN COLORADO Exhibit 1A Bad Faith Case Outcomes Chapter 2 TORT VERSUS CONTRACT REMEDIES 2.1 INSURED S REMEDIES LIMITED UNDER CONTRACT LAW 2.2 EXPANDED
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
Technical Help Desk Terms of Service
Technical Help Desk Terms of Service This esecuritel Technical Help Desk Terms of Service (the Agreement ) is provided in connection with the eligible tablet enrolled in either the Advanced Protection
Recommendation 84-7 Administrative Settlement of Tort and Other Monetary Claims Against the Government
Recommendation 84-7 Administrative Settlement of Tort and Other Monetary Claims Against the Government (Adopted December 7, 1984) In the Federal Tort Claims Act and dozens of other statutes, 1 Congress
ALEXANDER ALEC R. ROTHROCK Born Evanston, Illinois 1959
CURRICULUM VITAE ALEXANDER ALEC R. ROTHROCK Born Evanston, Illinois 1959 Burns, Figa & Will, P.C. Plaza Tower One, Suite 1000 6400 South Fiddler s Green Circle Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Telephone: (303)
3 Specific Statutory Waivers Of Sovereign Immunity
3 Specific Statutory Waivers Of Sovereign Immunity 3.01 CATEGORIZATION OF STATUTORY WAIVERS OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY: SPECIFIC AND GENERAL As introduced by the preceding chapter of this treatise, the concept
Construction Defect Action Reform Act
COLORADO REVISED STATUTES Title 13. Courts and Court Procedure Damages Regulation of Actions and Proceedings Article 20. Actions Part 8. Construction Defect Actions for Property Loss and Damage Construction
FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1
13-20-801. Short title Colorado Revised Statutes Title 13; Article 20; Part 8: CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ACTIONS FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1 This part 8 shall be known and may be cited as the Construction
Darryl S. Weiman, M.D., J.D.
By Darryl S. Weiman, M.D., J.D. Federal Tort Claims Act Passed by Congress in 1946 to reduce the negative impacts of the doctrine of sovereign immunity Designed to eliminate the practice of congressman
2016 IL App (1st) 152359-U. SIXTH DIVISION June 17, 2016. No. 1-15-2359 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2016 IL App (1st 152359-U SIXTH DIVISION June 17, 2016 No. 1-15-2359 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
Section 304 - What it Means to the United States Government
Guidance for the Healthcare Community Concerning Section 304 of the Homeland Security Act Manufacturers of smallpox vaccine and those healthcare entities under whose auspices the vaccine would be administered
RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES
RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES (a) Illegal, Prohibited, or Clearly Excessive Fees and Costs. [no change] (b) Factors to Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Fees and Costs. [no change]
Oklahoma Supreme Court Declares Oklahoma s Lawsuit Reform Act of 2009 Unconstitutional
Oklahoma Supreme Court Declares Oklahoma s Lawsuit Reform Act of 2009 Unconstitutional On June 4, 2013, the Oklahoma Supreme Court issued two opinions invalidating as unconstitutional numerous Oklahoma
ARBITRATION ADVISORY 1997-03 FEE ARBITRATION ISSUES INVOLVING CONTINGENCY FEES. August 22, 1997
ARBITRATION ADVISORY 1997-03 FEE ARBITRATION ISSUES INVOLVING CONTINGENCY FEES August 22, 1997 Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the Committee on Mandatory Fee Arbitration.
The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas
The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas NIGHTMARE ON MEDIATION STREET You mediate a case where the Plaintiff is suing
LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY By Peter L. Ostermiller
LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY By Peter L. Ostermiller Occasionally, a defendant, while incarcerated and apparently having nothing better to do, will file a Motion under RCr. 11.42,
CHAPTER 246 HOUSE BILL 2603 AN ACT
House Engrossed State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-second Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER HOUSE BILL 0 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, CHAPTER, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE
SUMMARY OF CONTENTS. C o m m o n R e p re s e n t a t i o n C o n f l i c t s
SUMMARY OF CONTENTS Contents Preface vii xix Part I Introductory Materials 1 Chapter 1 Introduction 3 Chapter 2 Disqualification Motion Procedure 17 Chapter 3 Grounds for Disqualification 41 P a r t I
SYLLABUS FOR MARITIME PERSONAL INJURY AND DEATH
SYLLABUS FOR MARITIME PERSONAL INJURY AND DEATH Spring 2016 PROFFESSOR JOHN F. UNGER 1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES The objectives of this course are to teach the substantive law of the subject matter integrated
The Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION PROCEDURES: A REFERENCE GUIDE
Responses submitted by: Name: Roddy Bourke Law Firm/Company: McCann FitzGerald Location: Dublin, Ireland 1. Would your jurisdiction be described as a common law or civil code jurisdiction? The Republic
FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE
33 U.S.C. 3729-33 FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE 31 U.S.C. 3729. False claims (a) LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN ACTS. (1) IN GENERAL. Subject to paragraph (2), any person who (A) knowingly presents, or causes
Liens: Workers' Compensation, Medicare, Medicaid, ERISA & DPW
Liens: Workers' Compensation, Medicare, Medicaid, ERISA & DPW Presented by: Daniel J. Siegel, Esquire Law Offices of Daniel J. Siegel, LLC Integrated Technology Services, LLC 66 West Eagle Road Suite 1
CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT OF 2005
PUBLIC LAW 109 2 FEB. 18, 2005 CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT OF 2005 VerDate 14-DEC-2004 04:23 Mar 05, 2005 Jkt 039139 PO 00002 Frm 00001 Fmt 6579 Sfmt 6579 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL002.109 BILLW PsN: PUBL002 119 STAT.
Sample Arbitration Clauses with Comments
Sample Arbitration Clauses with Comments BRIEF DESCRIPTION Arbitrations are creatures of contract. Thus, the parties can shape an arbitration proceeding to a great extent in their arbitration agreements.
1 (5) The state and its agencies and subdivisions shall be liable for tort claims in the
768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification; risk management programs. (1) In accordance with
Defense of State Employees: LIABILITY AND LAWSUITS. UNCW Office of General Counsel January 2010
Defense of State Employees: LIABILITY AND LAWSUITS UNCW Office of General Counsel January 2010 COMMON CAUSES OF ACTION (or what could we be sued for) Tort claims Contract claims Discrimination/Harassment
THE PROPERTY TAX PROTEST PROCESS
THE PROPERTY TAX PROTEST PROCESS A summary of the appeal procedures under the Texas Property Tax Code Presented by: Jason C. Marshall THE MARSHALL FIRM PC 302 N. Market Suite 510 Dallas TX 75202 214.742.4800
Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death
Appendix I: Select Legislative Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative is and Mesothelioma Benefits Act H.R. 6906, 93rd 1973). With respect to claims for benefits filed before December 31, 1974, would authorize
NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM MAP
NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM MAP Course Name: Business Law I Course Number: BUS180 Length of Course: Semester Grading Period CONTENT SKILLS First/Third Nine Weeks Unit of Study: Foundations of the
www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation
www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill covers a wide
AGREEMENT WITH FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR
AGREEMENT WITH FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR This Agreement, made and entered into this day of,, by and between the CITY OF SAN MATEO, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the
Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation
Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation by charlene m. morrow and dargaye churnet 1. Who enforces a patent? The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office grants a patent. Contrary to popular belief, a patent
TEXAS TORT REFORMS Appeal Bond Reform: HB 4 (2003). Asbestos/Silica Litigation Reform: SB 15 (2005).
TEXAS TORT REFORMS Appeal Bond Reform: HB 4 (2003). Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to the lesser of 50% of a defendant s net worth or $25 million. Provides
Title XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter
Title XLV TORTS Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE View Entire Chapter 768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification;
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE DRH11149-TG-5 (12/01) Short Title: Tort Reform Act of 2011. (Public)
H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH-TG- (/01) D Short Title: Tort Reform Act of. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Blust and Daughtry (Primary Sponsors). 1 A BILL TO BE
NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS
NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Independent Contractor. A. It is understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR s employees) is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer-employee
Fed Tort Claims Act, Attorney Dissertation, Finch McCranie LLP.
Fed Tort Claims Act, Attorney Dissertation, Finch McCranie LLP. By Richard W. Hendrix A REFRESHER ON THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT: HOW TO SUE THE UNITED STATES The Federal Tort Claims Act was enacted by
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
LITIGATING CLAIMS UNDER THE CONTRACT DISPUTES ACT
LITIGATING CLAIMS UNDER THE CONTRACT DISPUTES ACT U.S. Court of Federal Claims & Boards of Contract Appeals John G. DeGooyer Philip A. Nacke Steven C. Lambert November 2007 Overview Historical Background
Deal or Appeal. Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:30 PM to 5:45 PM Room # B405
Deal or Appeal Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:30 PM to 5:45 PM Room # B405 TM adventurelaw APPEAL OR DEAL: DEFENDING AN ACCIDENT AT YOUR FACILITY Prepared By R. Wayne Pierce, Esquire The Pierce Law Firm,
Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43
Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43 Calvin L. Keith, OSB No. 814368 [email protected] Sarah J. Crooks, OSB No. 971512 [email protected] PERKINS COIE LLP
Risk Management Policy
Risk Management Policy PURPOSE: NEW/REVISED POLICY: The California State Student Association maintains a Risk Management Policy to ensure the ongoing identification of potential risks and threats to the
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A
ENROLLED HOUSE BILL No. 4455
Act No. 204 Public Acts of 2012 Approved by the Governor June 26, 2012 Filed with the Secretary of State June 27, 2012 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 27, 2012 Introduced by Rep. Shaughnessy STATE OF MICHIGAN 96TH
PRIVATE ATTORNEY SERVICES DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION INTRODUCTION TO BILLING GUIDELINES
PRIVATE ATTORNEY SERVICES DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION INTRODUCTION TO BILLING GUIDELINES The Division of Risk Management, Bureau of Claims Administration, (Division) is
CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825
CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825 Filed 13 September 9 P4:46 Gary Fitzsimmons District Clerk Dallas District CADE MANNETTI, v. Plaintiff, VISIONARY RESTAURANTS LLC, VISIONARY STAFFING LLC, WILLIAM McCROREY, AND THOMAS
6 First-Party Litigation
I. Overview 6.1 6 First-Party Litigation II. Initial Client Meeting A. In General 6.2 B. Identifying the Proper Insurer 6.3 C. Determining the Types of Benefits Recoverable 1. In General 6.4 2. Work Loss
Question: Are Tribal Courts Different than State and Federal Courts?
Over the past decade, Indian tribes throughout the United States have become major players in the nation s economy. Tribes are aggressively creating and operating new businesses in the areas of real estate
SPECIAL CONDITION OF CONTRACTS
SPECIAL CONDITION OF CONTRACTS i) The contractors should quote the rate in figures as well as in words, and amount tendered by them. The amount for each item should be worked out and the requisite totals
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT This Independent Contractor Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered between Nordstrom, Inc. ( Nordstrom ), with a business address at 1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1000, Seattle,
PLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013.
PLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013. TOYOTA ASSOCIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ( T-ADR ): Summary Description
Personal Injury Litigation
Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2013
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2013 By: Representative Turner To: Judiciary A HOUSE BILL NO. 529 1 AN ACT TO REQUIRE CLAIMANTS IN ASBESTOS TORT ACTIONS TO MAKE 2 CERTAIN DISCLOSURES PERTAINING
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. 1. Application of rule. (a) This rule applies to: (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state; (2) All actions or proceedings
Case 3:06-cv-02136-P Document 335 Filed 02/07/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID 3588
Case 3:06-cv-02136-P Document 335 Filed 02/07/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID 3588 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff,
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT I.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION JANICE LEE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BETHESDA HOSPITAL, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Appeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays
Appeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays Appellate Lawyers Association April 22, 2009 Brad Elward Peoria Office The Effect of a Judgment A judgment is immediately subject to enforcement and collection. Illinois
STANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS
Notice: This Agreement is not valid unless signed and accepted by an officer of The Feldman Law Firm, P.C., who will make the sole decision whether to accept your case. This Agreement may be digitally
OCT 2003 Wide-Ranging Reforms Texas in Texas Tort Law Class Actions. Section 10.11, H.B. 4
Senate Research Center 201 E. 14th St. Sam Houston Bldg. Suite 575 Austin, TX 78701 Tel.: 512.463.0087 Fax: 512.463.1271 Dial 711 for Relay Calls OCT 2003 in The Legislature of the State of Texas finds
HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Policy Statement 1105.1 Effective date: 12/14/2000 Page 2
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Page 2 III. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY The General Counsel is delegated authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2672 to consider, ascertain,
Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation
Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation On January 1, 2012, new rules approved by the Colorado Supreme Court entitled the Civil Access Pilot Project ( CAPP
Global Guide to Competition Litigation Japan
Global Guide to Competition Litigation Japan 2012 Table of Contents Availability of private enforcement in respect of competition law infringement and jurisdiction... 1 Conduct of proceedings and costs...
Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship
Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship [click] By Bruce A. Campbell 1 Introduction In most areas of the practice of law, there are a number of ethical issues that arise on a frequent
No. 45TH. Plaintiff EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT files its Original Petition
FILED 9/24/2014 10:11:33 AM Donna Kay McKinney Bexar County District Clerk Accepted By: Roxanne Mujica 2014CI15241 No. W/ JD EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. Plaintiff, KOONTZ/MCCOMBS CONSTRUCTION,
Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.
CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT
ENDORSEMENT NO: This endorsement, effective 12:01 am, policy number forms part of issued to: by: THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT
Terms and Conditions for Tax Services
Terms and Conditions for Tax Services In the course of delivering services relating to tax return preparation, tax advisory, and assistance in tax controversy matters, Brady, Martz & Associates, P.C. (we
Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq.
Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq. Florida Continues as National Leader in Disciplinary
Bill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained
Bill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained A Presentation for CLE Employment Law Conference 2013 Pan Pacific Hotel Vancouver, BC May 9, 2013 Carman J. Overholt,
SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.
SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado
1.2 Distinguish between civil law and criminal law. 1.3 Distinguish between common law and equity
Tech Level Unit Title: Level: Level 3 Credit Value: 10 INTRODUCTION TO LAW AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN ENGLAND AND WALES Guided Learning Hours 60 Learning outcomes Assessment criteria Knowledge, understanding
The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance
PRODUCT LIABILITY Product Liability Litigation The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance By Kenneth Ross Product liability litigation and product safety regulatory activities in the U.S. and elsewhere
TITLE XXIII CLAIMS FOR LITIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
RULE 231 (7/6/12) 153 TITLE XXIII CLAIMS FOR LITIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS RULE 230. GENERAL (a) Applicability: The Rules of this Title XXIII set forth the special provisions which apply to claims
Removal to Federal Court - The New Rules Making it a Federal Case: New Developments Presented by Kevin Schiferl Frost Brown Todd (Indianapolis, IN)
Removal to Federal Court - The New Rules Making it a Federal Case: New Developments Presented by Kevin Schiferl Frost Brown Todd (Indianapolis, IN) The Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification
Australian Proportionate Liability Regime
Australian Proportionate Liability Regime May 2014 16 NOVEMBER 2011 Curwoods Lawyers Australia Square Plaza Building Level 9, 95 Pitt Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 t +61 2 9231 4166 f +61 2 9221 3720 CURWOODS
All About Motions To Dismiss
All About Motions To Dismiss Edna Sussman Motions to dismiss can be big winners or big losers. IT CAN BE one of the most satisfying experiences for a litigator. You pinpointed the fatal flaw in your opponent
Immigration Assistance Services
Immigration Assistance Services New York enacted A07137 into law in 2004. A07137 is reported to be the first to establish standards for immigration consultants. A press release from New York Governor Pataki
No. 1-10-0602 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
SECOND DIVISION May 31, 2011 No. 1-10-0602 Notice: This order was filed under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 16, 2001. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-00-00177-CV HENRY P. MASSEY AND ANN A. MASSEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF COURTNEY
Commodity Futures Trading Commission Commodity Whistleblower Incentives and Protection
Commodity Futures Trading Commission Commodity Whistleblower Incentives and Protection (7 U.S.C. 26) i 26. Commodity whistleblower incentives and protection (a) Definitions. In this section: (1) Covered
Determining Tax Liability Under Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code
Determining Tax Liability Under Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (the Code ) provides the means by which a debtor or trustee in bankruptcy may seek a determination
Comparison of Newly Adopted Utah Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules UTAH
Comparison of Newly Adopted Utah Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules UTAH Rules as adopted by Utah Supreme Court to be effective 11/1/05. Changes to Rules 1.12 and 2.4 effective 11/1/06.
NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR FLAGLER COUNTY, FLORIDA WILLIAM G. MAYFIELD, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 2009-CA-002245
CORE 573. Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies. Disability and the Law. Calendar Description. Content/Objectives. Outcomes/Competencies
Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies CORE 573 Half (3-0) Disability and the Law Calendar Description Foundations of Canadian legal principles and practice as they affect community rehabilitation.
APPENDIX A that is not acceptable. Arbitration settled by arbitration arbitration shall be held in New Jersey substantive law of New Jersey
APPENDIX A The attorneys in the Office of University Counsel at the University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus review many different types of contracts on behalf of the University. Legal review
LIMITATIONS. The Limitations Act. being
1 LIMITATIONS c. L-16.1 The Limitations Act being Chapter L-16.1* of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2004 (effective May 1, 2005), as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007, c.28. *NOTE: Pursuant
