National Injury Insurance Scheme: Motor Vehicle Accidents - Consultation Regulation Impact Statement
|
|
- Erik Farmer
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 National Injury Insurance Scheme: Motor Vehicle Accidents - Consultation Regulation Impact Statement To: Leesa Croke The Treasury Langton Crescent Parkes ACT 2600 By niisris@treasury.gov.au Date: 2 June 2014 Queries regarding this submission should be directed to: Irene Chrisafis Ph: (03) ichrisafis@liv.asn.au Law Institute of Victoria (LIV). No part of this submission may be reproduced for any purpose without the prior permission of the LIV. The LIV makes most of its submissions available on its website at
2 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 A no fault scheme should not erode common law rights... 3 Difference in Legislative Objectives - NDIS and TAC... 4 Case example... 4 Limits on self-directed care... 5 Case example... 5 The cost of disputes in a no fault scheme... 6 Other concerns regarding no fault schemes... 6 Other issues regarding the RIS... 7 Conclusion... 8 Page 2
3 Introduction The Law Institute of Victoria ( LIV ) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the National Injury Insurance Scheme ( NIIS ): Motor Vehicle Accidents, Consultation Regulation Impact Statement ( RIS ). The focus of the RIS is to identify options for Queensland and Western Australia to provide lifetime care and support for all newly acquired catastrophic injuries due to motor vehicle accidents. The options proposed in the RIS involve a catastrophically injured person receiving lifetime care and support through State and Territory based no fault schemes set up with minimum benchmarks regarding the provision of these services (ie the NIIS framework). Most jurisdictions already meet or are making significant progress towards meeting these benchmarks. Under the NIIS proposal, it is proposed a catastrophically injured person, who is injured as a result of the negligence or fault of another party, will lose their right to claim past and future lifetime medical, rehabilitation, care and support expenses at common law. The LIV is well placed to provide commentary on the RIS given the implementation of the Transport Accident Act (1986) (the TA Act ), which established the Transport Accident Commission ( TAC ) scheme within the Victorian jurisdiction since Under the TAC scheme, an injured claimant is unable to pursue past and future medical and related expenses in a common law claim for damages but rather, is required to claim these expenses on an ongoing basis through the TAC. The focus of the LIV s response will be on important considerations that the RIS has failed to address in its analysis of no fault schemes, including some illustrative case examples that have arisen in the TAC context. The benefits and advantages of common law rights and the importance to individuals and families have already been well covered by the Law Council of Australia in its response to the Productivity Commission Draft Report on Disability Care and Support. It is not intended to revisit these issues in detail here save to say that the LIV s view is that as matters of fairness and scheme sustainability, no fault benefits should not come at the cost of common law rights of all citizens. A no fault scheme should not erode common law rights A no fault scheme is important for people who sustain catastrophic injuries, in a motor vehicle accident in non-compensable circumstances, ie where there is no fault or negligence on the part of another party to enable the bringing of a common law claim. The LIV submits that a no fault system should not be at the expense of abolishing an individual s common law rights. There should be no disadvantage to any injured individual as a result of the introduction of any no fault scheme. Contrary to what is proposed in the RIS, the ability to pursue a common law claim for past and future medical, rehabilitation, care and support should remain available and exist in parallel with any no fault scheme. The potential for double dipping is easily prevented through means of the operation of the refund and preclusion periods incorporated into the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) ( the NDIS Act ) if a claimant is successful in obtaining common law damages. Page 3
4 Indeed, the retention of common law rights is critical to the financial sustainability of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) because catastrophically injured claimants who are able to recover damages either do not access benefits through the NDIS or if they do, the pay back requirements mean that the cost of supporting these claimants is ultimately borne by the insurer rather than the NDIS. Difference in Legislative Objectives - NDIS and TAC The objects of the NDIS Act include giving effect to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This incorporates principles of individual autonomy, freedom to make one s own choices, and independence of persons. The objects of the NDIS Act also include to support the independence and social and economic participation of people with disability and enable people with disability to exercise choice and control in the pursuit of their goals and planning and delivery of their supports. The LIV submits that a fundamental flaw in the practical application of a no fault scheme is that it does not necessarily enable individuals to self-determine or self-direct their future care and support needs in the same manner as they would if they had received common law damages. For example, the TA Act does not share the above objectives incorporated into the NDIS Act. Anecdotal reports suggest that a practical reality of the TAC scheme is that in many cases there is a limitation on the ability to achieve independence and selfdetermination for injured claimants. To inform the discussion, it would be helpful if the TAC provided detailed information about individual funding agreements entered into pursuant to Sections 61A to 61D of the TA Act. The LIV submits that the analysis in the RIS ignores how the fundamental principles of the NDIS scheme of autonomy, self-determination and independence will be protected and fostered with the introduction of the NIIS. There are numerous case examples, many of which result in costly disputation with the TAC. Case example A claimant sustained catastrophic injuries, including a spinal cord injury resulting in C6/C7 quadriplegia, when the driver of a vehicle failed to give way at a give-way sign, causing a high impact collision with her vehicle. At the time of the accident the claimant resided on a farm (140 acres) in Cowwar, Victoria. Her property was isolated, with her nearest neighbour approximately 800 metres away, and the terrain was uneven and grassy, making it difficult to negotiate in a wheel chair. The property was also in a bushfire area and if a bushfire occurred it would be extremely difficult for the claimant to leave the house and property, especially in a timely fashion. At the time of the accident the claimant worked as a veterinary nurse in a clinic in Maffra, a town over 30 kilometres away. In order to maximise her independence and mobility, the claimant wished to relocate to Maffra where she could independently access her workplace, medical and community services, shops, and be closer to her social support network of family and friends. The claimant believed that the move was particularly important for her to maintain her employment. The TAC denied the claimant s claim for relocation costs on the basis that her original house in Cowwar was capable of modification and that it was her choice to move to Maffra. The TAC s decision was overturned after a hearing at the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal ( VCAT ) in which it was decided that a home is not just the actual dwelling but also the surrounding geographical area, and it was dangerous for the claimant to remain living in Cowwar due to the bushfire risk, the difficulty in obtaining timely access to medical and ambulance services and the psychological impact of living a restricted and isolated lifestyle. Page 4
5 Limits on self-directed care Eroding the right of a catastrophically injured individual to claim future care needs through a lump sum common law claim puts them at a disadvantage, especially with respect to their autonomy and independence. A lump sum amount for future care needs provides an injured individual the freedom of choice and autonomy in how to utilise and disperse funds to best meet their needs and enhance their quality of life. This fosters independence and self-determination of care in a manner which is not available if that individual is subject to the bureaucracy of a no fault scheme. The operation of the TAC scheme in practice must be considered for its impact on clients and their ability to direct their own care. In a significant number of cases, an injured claimant is wholly reliant on the decision of a bureaucrat regarding each and every aspect of their treatment and care needs. The TA Act allows for the implementation of individual funding agreements to be put in place which provides some autonomy for individuals, however anecdotal reports suggest that the utilisation of these agreements in practice is low. In a significant number of cases, individuals must submit and justify each request for treatment and services whilst also satisfying the TAC s internal processes and requirements. This includes requests for straight forward, cyclical and obvious treatments and supports. For example, a claimant with a catastrophic spinal injury must seek permission each time s/he wishes to repair or replace a wheelchair. For example, a claimant with an amputation must have a prosthetic treatment request form completed and approved each time he/she requires a major repair or alteration to their existing prosthesis or a new prosthesis. Each request is subject to scrutiny and review by the TAC. In making a decision the TAC is informed by internal policy as well as the information provided by a claimant. Disputes regarding TAC decisions are common, costly and can lead to delay in benefit delivery to injured claimants. The LIV submits that the financial and emotional costs to individuals dependent on a state administered bureaucracy for their lifetime care and support is not adequately considered by the RIS. Case example The claimant was 5 years old when he was involved in a motor vehicle accident where he sustained severe head injuries resulting in marked cognitive and learning difficulties. As a result, he required special schooling at Narunga Special School. When the claimant was 15 years old a request was made to the TAC for a replacement computer, monitor and printer. The TAC only agreed to fund 50% of this cost ($1,240) on the basis it would also be used by the claimant for leisure and not just school work. The TAC s decision was overturned after a hearing at VCAT where evidence was adduced demonstrating the benefit the computer would provide the claimant, including educational and rehabilitative benefits such assisting him with drawing, constructing montages and composing letters. Page 5
6 The cost of disputes in a no fault scheme A benefit of awarding compensation in a lump sum at common law is that there is finality in the claim and in the associated costs. The LIV submits that the RIS fails to acknowledge or detail the ongoing costs of managing disputes in a no fault scheme, particularly given claimants are subject to the scheme for all their future treatment and care needs. The LIV suggests that Treasury obtain further data and factor these costs into its analysis. In 2005, protocols were introduced between the TAC and legal stakeholders allowing for successful alternative dispute resolution without the need to issue proceedings at VCAT. The TAC Annual Report 2013 (page 13), indicates that in the 2012/13 financial year 974 applications for review of a TAC decision were lodged under the dispute resolution protocols. If one assumes that half of these applications resolved successfully in that financial year at an average cost of $5,000, this equates to in excess of $2,400,000. Further, in the 2012/13 financial year 817 merit review applications were lodged at VCAT, which usually incur higher average costs than the matters that resolve under the protocols. The LIV rejects the proposition that a person be denied the ability to appeal or challenge a bureaucratic decision. This outcome would be unacceptable and would deny a person natural justice. The LIV raises the issue of disputation costs to illustrate that the RIS s analysis regarding the benefits and costs associated with the introduction and ongoing management of a no fault scheme is superficial. Other concerns regarding no fault schemes The LIV would also like to raise the following concerns that claimants may experience in a no fault scheme: - A claimant is only able to access treatment or services that are allowed within the legislative framework of the scheme. This means that certain treatment, services or supports are simply not covered by the scheme even though they may be of significant benefit to an injured claimant. This also means that the treatment and services available under the scheme are subject to legislative change at any point in time, which is at odds with the RIS s desired outcome of certainty. - There may be reluctance from service providers to engage with the bureaucracy and treat or service its clients. Some service providers often find the bureaucratic process to be so demanding as to make it unappealing to undertake treatment, care or support of a TAC claimant. Some professional health services providers complain it is demeaning and insulting to be required to justify their professional opinions to a claims officer. In addition, some service providers choose not to undertake TAC work due to, at times, burdensome administrative and reporting requirements. - The amount paid by the TAC for the provision of various and numerous health services may not reflect the market rate for such services. In the TAC context there is often a gap between what a service provider charges and what the TAC is prepared to pay for the service. This cost falls on the individual claimant if they wish to continue with that service provider or that type of treatment. - A bureaucracy can be slow in its decision making about what treatment will be provided to a claimant, possibly due to poorly trained claims staff and/or inadequate systems. Page 6
7 - Claims management and staff can also change over the course of a person s claim. The history and knowledge of a claimant s circumstances and the expertise that follows can be lost with a change in staff/claims management. A change in personnel can also be difficult and disheartening for injured claimants with anecdotal evidence suggesting that many feel at the mercy of the person making the decision. - Other things that can increase delays include that the TAC may require an injured claimant to attend medico-legal examinations for TAC to determine whether a particular treatment or service should be funded. This can add many months to the decision making time frame. Other issues regarding the RIS The LIV also wishes to highlight the following issues in relation to the RIS: 1. RIS asserts that mismanagement of lump sum compensation is an issue: The RIS details that mismanagement of a lump sum may be a risk but does not present evidence of this being a significant problem in practice. The RIS does not acknowledge the protections in place within the legal system to combat the mismanagement of funds. For example, in the Victorian context if a person is under a legal disability (eg. a severe acquired brain injury) a legal practitioner must seek court approval of a common law settlement. The compensation is then deposited into the Funds in Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria where it is managed and administered. If a legal practitioner fails to discharge this obligation, legal and professional ramifications apply. The Supreme Court of Victoria Annual Report (pages 44 and 45) confirms that in the financial year over $100 million was paid into the court fund with 748 new accounts opened. This illustrates that Funds in Court is a well-established mechanism that serves to protect recipients of compensation to ensure it is utilised in their best interests and not mismanaged. Further information is available on the Supreme Court of Victoria website and in particular the Funds in Court Information Guide. 2. No need for two schemes: The LIV submits that two schemes (NDIS and NIIS) are not required, and that the NDIS has the capacity to provide appropriate care and support to the catastrophically injured. To set up two schemes would be inefficient and costly, and in the LIV s view cannot be justified on an economies of scale rationale. In the LIV s view, the RIS fails to justify the significant expense associated with the establishment and ongoing management of State and Territory based bureaucracies of the NIIS. The LIV submits that an analysis of investing the potential NIIS set up and administration costs into the NDIS, and what this would mean in terms of improved benefit delivery to people with a disability and catastrophic injury, should be made. Page 7
8 3. Financial viability of no fault schemes: The concern expressed in the RIS for the potential for the mismanagement of funds does not address the ramifications for the catastrophically injured and the community as a whole should there be mismanagement of the funds of a NIIS - type scheme. Poor financial performance of a broad based no fault scheme leaves all at risk in the future provision of care and support. It is submitted that the New Zealand Accident Compensation Corporation is an example of poor financial management with a reduction in benefits accessible over time. Conclusion The LIV suggests that there are key factors that have not been addressed in the RIS regarding the management of lifetime care and support for people who sustain catastrophic injuries in motor vehicle accidents. This not only includes additional financial and administrative costs, but also costs associated with an individual losing independence and the ability to self-direct their care. The Productivity Commission concluded that adequacy of care should be defined by certainty, timeliness and quality of access, and that no fault schemes best provide for this. It is submitted that the issues and examples raised above highlight that no fault schemes do not necessarily deliver this objective. Page 8
LAWYERS New South Wales & Victoria. A transport accident is an incident directly caused by a motor car or motor vehicle, a railway train, or a tram.
LAWYERS New South Wales & Victoria Transport Accident Commission (TAC) Claims FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What is a transport accident? A transport accident is an incident directly caused by a motor car
More informationOptions to add no-fault catastrophic injury cover
Options to add no-fault catastrophic injury cover Towards an appropriate solution Submission to Insurance Commission of Western Australia Green Paper - Options to add non-fault catastrophic injury cover
More informationExpansion of Motor Injury Insurance Cover Catastrophic Injury Support scheme
Frequently Asked Questions Expansion of Motor Injury Insurance Cover Catastrophic Injury Support scheme What is the Catastrophic Injury Support scheme? What is a catastrophic injury? A catastrophic injury
More informationConsultation Regulation Impact Statement
www.pwc.com.au National Injury Insurance Scheme: Motor Vehicle Accidents April 2014 Consultation Regulation Impact Statement Disclaimer This Report has been prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia
More informationPublic Record Office Standard. Retention & Disposal Authority for Records of the Transport Accident Prevention and Assistance Functions
Public Record Office Standard PROS 14/01 Authority Retention & Disposal Authority for Records of the Transport Accident Prevention and Assistance Functions Version 2014 14/01 Issue Date: 15/08/2014 Copyright
More informationPeople with Disabilities WA individual & systemic advocacy
People with Disabilities WA individual & systemic advocacy Submission Options to add No-Fault Catastrophic Injury Cover to Western Australia s Compulsory Third Party Insurance Scheme December 2014 People
More information1.1 Australian Capital Territory 1.2 New South Wales 1.3 Northern Territory 1.4 Queensland
Attachment C 1. Workers Compensation Schemes 1.1 Australian Capital Territory 1.2 New South Wales 1.3 Northern Territory 1.4 Queensland 1.5 South Australia 1.6 Tasmania 1.7 Victoria 1.8 Western Australia
More informationWORKCOVER QUEENSLAND AMENDMENT BILL 2002
1 WORKCOVER QUEENSLAND AMENDMENT BILL 2002 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE Objectives of the legislation To provide for miscellaneous amendments to the WorkCover Queensland Act 1996. Reason for the Bill
More informationNational Disability Insurance Scheme (Supports for Participants Accounting for Compensation) Rules 2013
National Disability Insurance Scheme (Supports for Participants Accounting for Compensation) Rules 2013 National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (the Act) The Act establishes the National Disability
More informationB U R T & D A V I E S PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS HOW TO FIND THE RIGHT LAWYER
HOW TO FIND THE RIGHT LAWYER If you are injured in a transport accident having the right lawyer to represent you is very important. Your choice of lawyer may turn out to be the most important decision
More informationInformation for people injured in road crashes
Information for people injured in road crashes What is CTP insurance? All South Australian drivers pay a CTP insurance premium when they register their vehicle. The CTP premium provides drivers and/or
More informationConsultation Regulation Impact Statement: National Injury Insurance Scheme Motor Vehicle Accidents
4 June 2014 Ms Leesa Croke The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 By email: niisris@treasury.gov.au Dear Ms Croke Consultation Regulation Impact Statement: National Injury Insurance Scheme Motor
More informationWorkCover claims. Report 18: 2014 15
Report 18: 2014 15 Queensland Audit Office Location Level 14, 53 Albert Street, Brisbane Qld 4000 PO Box 15396, City East Qld 4002 Telephone (07) 3149 6000 Email Online qao@qao.qld.gov.au www.qao.qld.gov.au
More informationHave you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION
Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION If you have suffered a personal injury it is important to consider all potential sources of compensation. A personal
More informationTHE NSW COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY GREEN SLIP INSURANCE SCHEME: SUBMISSION TO THE CONSULTATION ON THE PROPOSED REFORMS
The Hon Greg Pearce MLC Minister for Finance & Services Minister for the Illawarra 5 April 2013 Dear Minister THE NSW COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY GREEN SLIP INSURANCE SCHEME: SUBMISSION TO THE CONSULTATION
More informationCLAIMS HANDLING GUIDELINES. for CTP Insurers
CLAIMS HANDLING GUIDELINES for CTP Insurers Initially issued 2000 Reissued: 1 July 2004; 18 September 2006; 1 July 2008; 1 October 2008, 1 May 2014 INTRODUCTION The MAA Claims Handling Guidelines (the
More informationTransport Accident Act No Fault Dispute Resolution Protocols 1 March 2005 (amended as from August 2008)
Transport Accident Act No Fault Dispute Resolution Protocols 1 March 2005 (amended as from August 2008) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Consistent with its mission and vision statement, Client Service Charter and
More informationNational Injury Insurance Scheme Workplace Accidents
1 National Injury Insurance Scheme Workplace Accidents Consultation Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) 1. Introduction The Commonwealth is working with the States and Territories to develop a National Injury
More informationProposed changes to the Comcare scheme
Proposed changes to the Comcare scheme Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill 2014 (Cth) Submission to Senate Standing Committee on Education and Employment Inquiry into the
More information12 May 2014. Professor Barbara McDonald Commissioner Australian Law Reform Commission GPO Box 3708 Sydney NSW 2001. By Email to: info@alrc.gov.
12 May 2014 Geoff Bowyer T 03 9607 9497 F 03 9607 5270 president@liv.asn.au Professor Barbara McDonald Commissioner Australian Law Reform Commission GPO Box 3708 Sydney NSW 2001 By Email to: info@alrc.gov.au
More informationOptions to add No-Fault Catastrophic Injury Cover to Western Australia s Compulsory Third Party Insurance Scheme
Green Paper Options to add No-Fault Catastrophic Injury Cover to Western Australia s Compulsory Third Party Insurance Scheme 1 Contents Foreword Treasurer... 3 Executive summary... 5 Our current CTP insurance
More informationLEGAL COSTS IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA'S WORKERS' COMPENSATION SCHEME
BLAKE DAWSON WALDRON SOLICITORS LEGAL COSTS IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA'S WORKERS' COMPENSATION SCHEME February 1997 Workcover Corporation,. Library Worl(Cove _. i00,waymouth Street toz.v.,.;4.'rk:iilatil Adelaide
More informationDocument 1. National Injury Insurance Scheme Issues Discussion Paper
Document 1 National Injury Insurance Scheme Issues Discussion Paper 1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 1. The rationale for national arrangements for insurance for catastrophic injury... 5 Motor vehicle
More informationA GUIDE FOR PEOPLE INJURED IN A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT
A GUIDE FOR PEOPLE INJURED IN A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CONTENTS General information 02 Early payment of expenses 03 The Accident Notification Form (ANF) 03 Who can make a claim Other driver or owner at
More informationSubmission by AFA Pty Ltd on the development of new Terms of Reference for the Financial Ombudsman Service
Submission by AFA Pty Ltd on the development of new Terms of Reference for the Financial Ombudsman Service Preamble AFA Pty Ltd does not operate as an insurer in its own right, but offers its products
More informationTHE CASE FOR COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY INSURANCE REFORM IN THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
240 CANBERRA LAW REVIEW [(2011) THE CASE FOR COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY INSURANCE REFORM IN THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY JON STANHOPE Sixty years ago, on 14 November 1947, Herbert Victor Johnson, Minister
More informationHeads of Agreement between the Commonwealth and Queensland Governments on the National Disability Insurance Scheme
Heads of Agreement between the Commonwealth and Queensland Governments on the National Disability Insurance Scheme This Agreement is made BETWEEN the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Commonwealth) and the STATE
More informationB U R T & D A V I E S PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS
TRANSPORT ACCIDENT LAW SPINAL CORD INJURIES Transport accidents account for about 40% of all spinal cord injuries in Victoria. The Transport Accident Commission (TAC) is required to compensate victims
More informationHow To Amend The Motor Accident Compensation Act 1999
CUR CURWOODS NEWS BULLETIN Background Motor Accident Injuries Amendment Bill 2013 The NSW State Government tabled the Motor Accident Injuries Amendment Bill 2013 (the Bill) on 9 May 2013. The Bill purports
More informationISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS June 2013 Legal Policy Division Department of the Attorney-General and Justice
More informationAASW Response to the NSW Compulsory Third Party Green Slip Insurance Scheme Reforms [NSW Government Motor Accidents Authority]
AASW Response to the NSW Compulsory Third Party Green Slip Insurance Scheme Reforms [NSW Government Motor Accidents Authority] April, 2013 Australian Association of Social Workers National Office Canberra
More informationDISPUTE RESOLUTION (INSURANCE)
DISPUTE RESOLUTION (INSURANCE) This fact sheet is for information only. It is recommended that you get legal advice about your situation. CASE STUDY Dan was very frustrated with his insurance company.
More informationJanice Roberts. Qualifications to Make Comment on Green Paper
Response to Green Paper Provided by Janice Roberts- Bachelor Applied Science (Social Work) Accredited, MAASW, Diploma in Nursing Email janirobe@bigpond.com Mobile 0417565392 Qualifications to Make Comment
More informationConsultation Report. Consultation Report: Personal Injuries (Liabilities and Damages) Act - Assessments of Permanent Impairment JUNE 2015
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE Consultation Report Consultation Report: Personal Injuries (Liabilities and Damages) Act - Assessments of Permanent Impairment JUNE 2015 Legal Policy 68 The
More informationTransport Accident (Amendment) Bill
MTHltR RO \'NSON ~ ;-IF.DOERWlCKS '..IBRAR\ Transport Accident (Amendment) Bill As Sent Print EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM PART I-PRELIMINARY Clause 1 Clause 2 sets out the purposes of the Act. provides for
More informationBetter Practice Guide Maintaining & Returning Injured Workers to Work
Better Practice Guide Maintaining & Returning Injured Workers to Work March 2013 This Better Practice Guide examines the key drivers for achieving favourable rehabilitation and return to work outcomes
More informationMAKING A PERSONAL INJURIES CLAIM*
MAKING A PERSONAL INJURIES CLAIM* GETTING STARTED DO I HAVE A CASE? The first step is to contact one of our experienced personal injuries solicitors and arrange a no obligation consultation. At the initial
More informationVICTORIAN TRANSPORT ACCIDENT CLAIMS - A GUIDE TO YOUR ENTITLEMENTS
VICTORIAN TRANSPORT ACCIDENT CLAIMS - A GUIDE TO YOUR ENTITLEMENTS This guide includes the following: What is a transport accident? Who is the TAC? How do I make a claim? When will I know if my claim has
More informationNATIONAL WORKERS COMPENSATION AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY FRAMEWORKS
NATIONAL WORKERS COMPENSATION AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY FRAMEWORKS SUBMISSION TO THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION FROM THE BUSINESS COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA 1 INTRODUCTION SUBMISSION The BCA makes the
More informationClaim Estimates and WorkSafe Premiums
Claim Estimates and WorkSafe Premiums Introduction For employers with annual rateable remuneration of over $200,000 premiums for WorkSafe insurance are calculated taking into account their claims performance
More informationBREAKFAST BRIEFING SEMINAR AILA
AILA BREAKFAST BRIEFING SEMINAR NDIS (National Disability Insurance Scheme) no fault schemes, recovery actions & implications for the insurance industry Paper presented by Ralph Bönig Special Counsel Finlaysons
More informationLEGAL AID ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW INTO ESTABLISHING A CONTINGENCY LEGAL AID FUND IN NORTHERN IRELAND
LEGAL AID ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW INTO ESTABLISHING A CONTINGENCY LEGAL AID FUND IN NORTHERN IRELAND WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS 1. The Association of Personal Injury
More informationThis response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS).
Introduction This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS). MASS is a Society of solicitors acting for the victims of motor accidents, including those involving Personal
More informationResponse of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) Civil Law Reform Bill - CP53/09
Response of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) - CP53/09 February 2010 Contents Contents... 2 Introduction... 3 Browne Jacobson LLP... 3 Interest in the Consultation... 3 The Response... 3 Summary... 4 Response
More informationMotor Accidents Compensation
Motor Accidents Compensation About MAC, the benefits and how to claim Information is current as at February 2012 Contact Us Phone: 1300 301 833, then choose Option 3 Monday to Friday: 8.30am 5.00pm Email:
More informationPersonal injury claims advice solicitors
Personal injury claims advice solicitors If you've suffered an accident or a personal injury that wasn't your fault, you could be entitled to make a compensation claim. Millbank solicitors personal injury
More informationTransport Accident Act Impairment Assessment Protocols 1 March 2005 (amended as from August 2007)
Transport Accident Act Impairment Assessment Protocols 1 March 2005 (amended as from August 2007) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Consistent with its mission and vision statement, Client Service Charter and public
More informationREVIEW OF THE CIVIL LAW LEGAL AID SCHEME CONSULTATION REGARDING RECOMMENDATIONS
REVIEW OF THE CIVIL LAW LEGAL AID SCHEME CONSULTATION REGARDING RECOMMENDATIONS Overview Legal Aid Queensland has reviewed the Civil Law Legal Aid Scheme (CLLAS). This paper lists the review recommendations
More informationA Guide to the Workplace Injury Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2013. Edition No. 1 2014
A Guide to the Workplace Injury Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2013 Edition No. 1 2014 Contents FOREWORD 1 INTRODUCTION 2 HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE 2 Finding key provisions within the Workplace Injury
More informationMotor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Regulations 2013
Version: 1.7.2013 South Australia Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Regulations 2013 under the Motor Vehicles Act 1959 Contents 1 Short title 2 Commencement 3 Interpretation 4 Claim for compensation
More informationDesjardins. Maria Cece Senior Manager Automobile Insurance Policy Unit
Desjardins Maria Cece Senior Manager Automobile Insurance Policy Unit Ministry Industrial of Finance and Financial Policy Branch 95 Grosvenor Street, 4 th Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A lz1 Re: DGIG Response
More informationThe NSW Lifetime Care and Support Scheme
The NSW Lifetime Care and Support Scheme Prepared by Sir James Martin Chambers Presented to the Institute of Actuaries of Australia XIth Accident Compensation Seminar 1-4 April 2007 Grand Hyatt Melbourne,
More informationFeedback on the proposals for South Australia s Compulsory Third Party Insurance Scheme transition to a no-fault scheme
Feedback on the proposals for South Australia s Compulsory Third Party Insurance Scheme transition to a no-fault scheme Presented to Department of Treasury and Finance, Government of South Australia April
More informationResolving Disputes without Courts commentary from Law Council of Australia
Australian Centre for Justice Innovation Civil Justice Research Online Access to Justice 6-22-2012 Resolving Disputes without Courts commentary from Law Council of Australia Stasia Tan Law Council of Australia
More informationDEECD Corporate WorkSafe policy guide January 2013
DEECD Corporate WorkSafe policy guide January 2013 Published by the Communications Division for Human Resources Division Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Melbourne January 2013 State
More informationRoad to Recovery Rehabilitation following a motor vehicle accident
Road to Recovery Rehabilitation following a motor vehicle accident If you have been injured in a motor vehicle accident, rehabilitation may help you recover and move on with your life. Queensland Compulsory
More informationMotoring Legal Solutions
Motoring Legal Solutions Page 1 Why you need Motoring Legal Solutions Being involved in any kind of car accident can be very distressing. If you are unfortunate enough to be involved in an accident that
More informationManagement of major injury claims by the Transport Accident Commission
V I C T O R I A Auditor General Victoria Management of major injury claims by the Transport Accident Commission Ordered to be printed by Authority. Government Printer for the State of Victoria No. 100
More informationRoad Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 (RAFA)
Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 (RAFA) Topic: Roads and Public Liability IN A CALABASH Introduction Road transportation is the major mode of transportation in South Africa. Despite a number of road laws
More informationAvant Mutual Group Limited. Submissions to the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission Inquiry into Aspects of the Wrongs Act 1958
Avant Mutual Group Limited Submissions to the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission Inquiry into Aspects of the Wrongs Act 1958 1. Introduction Avant Mutual Group Limited ( Avant ) is Australia
More informationWorkers guide to workers compensation Guide
Workers guide to workers compensation Guide www.worksafe.nt.gov.au Disclaimer This publication contains information regarding workers rehabilitation and compensation. It includes some of your obligations
More informationWorkers Compensation (Legal Practitioners and Registered Agents) Costs Determination 2014
Western Australia Workers Compensation and Injury Management Act 1981 Workers Compensation (Legal Practitioners and Registered Agents) Costs Determination 2014 As at 28 Feb 2014 Version 00-a0-01 Western
More informationA guide for. Requesting care. in the NSW Motor Accidents Scheme
A guide for Requesting care in the NSW Motor Accidents Scheme MAA 2014 2 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Principles 3. The Compulsory Third Party insurance scheme How to check claim details Accident Notification
More informationMotor Trades Association of Queensland Response to Productivity Commission Draft Report Smash Repair and Insurance
Motor Trades Association of Queensland Response to Productivity Commission Draft Report Smash Repair and Insurance Submitted by: The Motor Trades Association of Queensland Date: January 2005 In response
More informationSubmission of the. Australian Lawyers Alliance. to the. Queensland Parliament. Family Violence Prevention Committee
Submission of the Australian Lawyers Alliance to the Queensland Parliament Communities, Disability Services and Domestic and Family Violence Prevention Committee Inquiry into a fair and balanced model
More informationFeedback on the Inquiry into Serious Injury. Presented to the Road Safety Committee of the Parliament of Victoria. 08 May 2013
Feedback on the Inquiry into Serious Injury Presented to the Road Safety Committee of the Parliament of Victoria 08 May 2013 About the APA The Australian Physiotherapy Association (APA) is the peak body
More informationIn order to prove negligence the Claimant must establish the following:
Introduction A wealth of law exists to provide compensation to people who have suffered injuries, both physical and psychological, following an accident. This fact sheet provides a very brief guide to
More information1. TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 2. INTRODUCTION 2 3. ACTION ITEMS 7 4. SUPPORTING COMMENTS ON THE ACTION ITEMS 11 5. LAWYERS AND LEGAL ADVICE 19
Table of contents Page 1. TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 2. INTRODUCTION 2 3. ACTION ITEMS 7 4. SUPPORTING COMMENTS ON THE ACTION ITEMS 11 5. LAWYERS AND LEGAL ADVICE 19 6. MODIFICATION TO THE COMCARE WEBSITE 24
More informationA guide for injured workers. Introducing WorkSafe
A guide for injured workers Introducing WorkSafe September July 2013 2011 Contents 1. About us 1 2. Weekly payments (income entitlements) 2 3. Services to help you get better 4 4. Getting back to work
More informationAvant welcomes the opportunity to provide input into the Productivity Commission s draft report on Access to Justice Arrangements.
21 May 2014 Access to Justice Productivity Commission GPO Box 1428 Canberra City ACT 2601 Access to Justice Arrangements Draft Report Avant welcomes the opportunity to provide input into the Productivity
More informationAMENDMENTS TO THE AUTO INSURANCE REGULATIONS: ACCIDENT BENEFITS AND BILL 198
AMENDMENTS TO THE AUTO INSURANCE REGULATIONS: ACCIDENT BENEFITS AND BILL 198 Introduction Earlier this year, the Progressive Conservative Government passed Bill 198 amending the Insurance Act. This represents
More informationCEPU Representatives Guidelines Australia Post Workers Compensation
CEPU Representatives Guidelines Australia Post Workers Compensation Introduction This Union Representatives Guide provides information on the following rights and entitlements of workers' compensation
More informationTransport Accident Act Common Law Protocols 1 April 2005 (amended as from March 2010)
Transport Accident Act Common Law Protocols 1 April 2005 (amended as from March 2010) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Consistent with its mission and vision statement, Client Service Charter and public commitment
More informationInquiry into Schedule 2 of the Veterans Affairs Legislation Amendment (2015 Budget Measures) Bill 2015
Inquiry into Schedule 2 of the Veterans Affairs Legislation Amendment (2015 Budget Measures) Bill 2015 Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee 16 September 2015 GPO Box 1989, Canberra
More informationSubmission on Review of Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 Issues Paper September 2012
Submission on Review of Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 Issues Paper September 2012 I should say that I have first-hand knowledge and experience with workers compensation claims by virtue
More informationThe Chair Finance and Administration Committee Parliament House George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000. By email: fac@parliament.qld.gov.au.
The Chair Finance and Administration Committee Parliament House George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 By email: fac@parliament.qld.gov.au 3 September 2012 Dear Mr Michael Crandon MP, OPERATION OF QUEENSLAND'S
More informationInsurance insights THE MECHANICS OF MOTOR INJURY SCHEMES. Design considerations for personal injury insurance schemes for motorists
Insurance insights THE MECHANICS OF MOTOR INJURY SCHEMES Design considerations for personal injury insurance schemes for motorists October 2013 Chris McHugh Executive General Manager Statutory Portfolio
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS ROAD ACCIDENT INJURIES / MVA WESTERN AUSTRALIA
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS ROAD ACCIDENT INJURIES / MVA WESTERN AUSTRALIA 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family
More informationEnglish Civil Law and the Foreign Motorist. Justice or a Lawyer s Lunch?
English Civil Law and the Foreign Motorist Justice or a Lawyer s Lunch? Agenda Basic Principles The Civil Procedure The Claim - Practice Basic principles English Law is based on precedent - what courts
More informationThe Victorian Transport Accident Scheme. Heather Evans General Manager, Strategy
The Victorian Transport Accident Scheme Heather Evans General Manager, Strategy Agenda 1. Overview of the Scheme 2. Recent Performance 3. Key Initiatives Who is the TAC fully funded combined no-fault and
More informationAvant Mutual Group Limited
Avant Mutual Group Limited Submissions on Draft Report of the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission s Inquiry into Aspects of the Wrongs Act 1958 1. Key points and general comments Avant does
More informationMOTOR VEHICLE COMPENSATION CLAIM SUCCESS
MOTOR VEHICLE COMPENSATION CLAIM SUCCESS 6 WAYS TO RUIN YOUR MOTOR VEHICLE COMPENSATION CLAIM 6 WAYS TO RUIN YOUR MOTOR VEHICLE COMPENSATION CLAIM In this guide, we have outlined the 6 most common ways
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS WORKERS COMPENSATION NSW
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS WORKERS COMPENSATION NSW 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family shouldn t have to suffer.
More informationSYNOPSIS. AN INVESTMENT APPROACH TO REDUCING LONG TERM COST LESSONS FROM WELFARE Hugh Miller
AN INVESTMENT APPROACH TO REDUCING LONG TERM COST LESSONS FROM WELFARE Hugh Miller Keywords: Accident compensation, CTP, welfare, valuation, lifetime cost, return on investment Purpose of your paper: Discusses
More informationACMA Determination Submission
Submission ACMA Determination Submission Queensland Police Service response to an invitation to comment on the draft Telecommunications (Emergency Call Service) Determination 2009, issued June 2009. Introduction
More informationEWART PRICE SOLICITORS ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS - NOTES FOR CLAIMING FOR PERSONAL INJURY AND OTHER UNINSURED LOSSES
E P EWART PRICE SOLICITORS ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS - NOTES FOR CLAIMING FOR PERSONAL INJURY AND OTHER UNINSURED LOSSES If you have been involved in a Road Traffic Accident as a driver or passenger we hope
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS ROAD ACCIDENT INJURIES SOUTH AUSTRALIA
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS ROAD ACCIDENT INJURIES SOUTH AUSTRALIA 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family shouldn
More informationHome Model Legislation Commerce, Insurance, and Economic Development. Consumer Choice Motor Vehicle Insurance Act
Search GO LOGIN LOGOUT HOME JOIN ALEC CONTACT ABOUT MEMBERS EVENTS & MEETINGS MODEL LEGISLATION TASK FORCES ALEC INITIATIVES PUBLICATIONS NEWS Model Legislation Civil Justice Commerce, Insurance, and Economic
More informationContract and Relationship Manager
Contract and Relationship Manager Executive Level 1 New Position Legal Practice Management Team General Counsel Group Ongoing Vacancy Full-time Canberra/Melbourne $88,707 to $105,698 plus 15.4% superannuation
More informationILARS POLICY Funding of applications by injured workers to pursue claims for compensation
ILARS POLICY Funding of applications by injured workers to pursue claims for compensation Introduction This WIRO Policy sets out the circumstances in which the Independent Legal Assistance and Review Service
More informationNational Disability Long term Care and Support Scheme
National Disability Long term Care and Support Scheme Submission to the Productivity Commission Richard Madden, BSc, PhD, FIAA Professor of Health Statistics, University of Sydney August 2010 Outline This
More informationProductivity Commission inquiry into a long term disability care and support scheme. Avant Mutual Group submission
Productivity Commission inquiry into a long term disability care and support scheme Background Avant Mutual Group submission Avant Mutual Group Limited (Avant) is Australia's largest medical defence organisation
More informationReview of the General Insurance Code of Practice
Flemington & Kensington Community Legal Centre Inc. Review of the General Insurance Code of Practice Joint Submission to the Insurance Council of Australia on its Review of the General Insurance Code of
More informationHistory of the Workers' Compensation Court For the Senate Joint Resolution No. 23 Study
History of the Workers' Compensation Court For the Senate Joint Resolution No. 23 Study Prepared for the Revenue and Transportation Interim Committee by Megan Moore, Legislative Research Analyst Legislative
More informationCOAG National Legal Profession Reform Discussion Paper: Professional Indemnity Insurance
COAG National Legal Profession Reform Discussion Paper: Professional Indemnity Insurance Introduction Professional indemnity insurance is insurance that:... indemnifies professional people accountants,
More informationLegal Aid WA. We Help More People Than You Think. (Presentation to FCAWA October 2014)
Legal Aid WA We Help More People Than You Think (Presentation to FCAWA October 2014) Our Aims To help people to resolve their legal problems as soon as possible. To make it easier for people to get legal
More informationNational Deaf Children s Society (NDCS) submission to Work and Pensions Select Committee inquiry
National Deaf Children s Society (NDCS) submission to Work and Pensions Select Committee inquiry Employment support for disabled people: Access to Work Summary Access to Work (AtW) plays a vital role in
More informationFIRST REVIEW OF THE COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY
Submission No 12 FIRST REVIEW OF THE COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY INSURANCE SCHEME Organisation: Date received: 20 May 2016 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons NSW REVIEW OF THE COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY INSURANCE
More informationMotor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95
New South Wales Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 2 4 Amendment of other
More informationPWD ACT Inc. This submission is made by People With Disabilities ACT (PWD ACT) the peak consumer organisation for people with disabilities in the ACT.
PWD ACT Inc PO Box 717 Mawson ACT 2607 W. www.pwdact.org.au E. pwdact@shout.org.au P. 02 6286 4223 Introduction This submission is made by People With Disabilities ACT (PWD ACT) the peak consumer organisation
More information