Title: Federal Health Care Program Exclusion Screening
|
|
|
- Bertina Richards
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Title: Federal Health Care Program Exclusion Screening Effective Date: 10/00; Rev. 09/02, 10/04, 02/07, 09/09 POLICY: IHS and affiliates may not employ or develop a relationship with an Ineligible Person (as defined below). SCOPE: IHS system wide. All IHS and affiliate facilities including, but not limited to, hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, home care programs, physician practices, and all IHS and affiliate departments. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this policy is to provide a standard requirement and process for screening individuals and/or entities to ensure that IHS and its affiliates do not employ or develop a relationship with an Ineligible Person. The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General and the General Services Administration provide the sanction list and require screening in order to protect beneficiaries and control fraud and abuse in Federal Health Care Programs. PROCEDURES: 1. Definition. 1.1 An Ineligible Person is any individual or entity who is currently or was excluded, suspended, debarred or otherwise ineligible to participate in the Federal Health Care Programs (as defined in 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(f) or in any other government payment program) pursuant to a criminal conviction relating to the provision of health care items or services, and whose participation in the Federal Health Care Program has not been reinstated. 1.2 Business Partner is an individual or entity who is retained by contract or otherwise to perform, conduct or provide services or products to IHS or its related affiliates. 2. Prescreening. 2.1 Before IHS or an affiliate enters into an employment agreement with a potential employee, the Human Resources department at that entity will ensure that the potential employee is not an Ineligible Person. Page 1 of 10 09/09
2 2.2 Before entering into an educational program agreement with an educational institution, the institution shall be responsible for furnishing a list of prospective student program participants indicating whether the student is an Ineligible Person. 2.3 Before entering into a relationship with a Business Partner and/or before paying for services provided by a new Business Partner, the IHS or affiliate personnel proposing to enter into the relationship will ensure that the proposed Business Partner is not an Ineligible Person. 2.4 Potential Business Partners should receive the Guidance for Business Partners prior to any provision of services to IHS or affiliates. 2.5 Contracts with Business Partners should include representations by the Business Partner that it is in compliance with all applicable laws, and neither it nor any of its employees or subcontractors are excluded from or ineligible to participate in a Federal Health Care Program (as defined in 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(f)). Sample language for these representations is available at the IHS Law Department. 2.6 Before approving individuals to serve on Boards of Directors/Trustees, the IHS and Affiliate CEO must assure that each of the proposed Board members is not an Ineligible Person. 2.7 During the credentialing process, the IHS and affiliate Medical Staff offices must assure that the proposed Medical Staff member, or other person to whom privileges may be granted, is not an Ineligible Person. 2.8 Designated individuals at each affiliate must compare the name (entity name or last name), social security number or federal tax identification number (TIN) and birth date (when available) of each potential employee, Business Partner, Board member, or Medical Staff member to the General Service Administration s List of Parties Excluded from Federal Programs (the GSA List ) and the Health and Human Services/Office of Inspector General List of Excluded Individual/Entities (the OIG Sanction List ). Because the GSA List and OIG Sanction List do not have all fields filled or may use different degrees of completeness for names, designated individuals should perform partial name searches as well. It may be necessary to verify a potential match with the debarring agency identified in the record information. (See Attachment A to Policy, Exclusion Screening Guidance and Tips. ) 2.9 The GSA List and the OIG Sanction List are on the Internet in searchable formats at, respectively Page 2 of 10 09/09
3 and IHS and its affiliates may not employ or establish a business relationship with individuals or entities whose names appear on the OIG Sanction List or the GSA List unless such individual or entity can demonstrate that they are not the Ineligible Person. 3. Annual Screening. 3.1 IHS Internal Audit Services will check the list of current employees, Business Partners, Board members and Medical Staff members against the OIG and GSA Sanction Lists on at least an annual basis. 3.2 If an individual or company shows up as an Ineligible Person, the name of the individual or company and the reason for exclusion will be reported to the Affiliate Compliance Officer. 3.3 The Affiliate Compliance Officer or designee will perform a follow-up by looking up each potential match on the appropriate website using the social security number or TIN. The follow-up results will then be communicated to Internal Audit. Because the GSA List and OIG Sanction List do not have all fields filled or may use different degrees of completeness for names, designated individuals should perform partial name searches as well. It may be necessary to verify a potential match with the debarring agency identified in the record information. 4. Match Procedure. 4.1 When an employee, Business Partner, Board member or Medical Staff member is identified as an Ineligible Person, the Affiliate Compliance Officer or designee will contact the potential Ineligible Person and arrange a meeting At this time, the alleged Ineligible Person will be told that he/she is believed to be an Ineligible Person and offered an opportunity to distinguish him or herself from the person on the OIG Sanction List or GSA List The alleged Ineligible Person must provide proof within two weeks of the meeting showing that he/she is not the person on the OIG Sanction List or GSA List. Failure to provide such proof will result in immediate termination of employment, grounds for Page 3 of 10 09/09
4 termination of the contract, termination of medical staff privileges, termination of Board appointment, and/or termination of other form of relationship The IHS Compliance Officer will make any final determination if further issues arise as to the identity or eligibility of the persons or entities on the OIG Sanction List or GSA List. 4.2 For employees, eligibility for re-employment after the period of exclusion and notice of reinstatement will be evaluated based on minimum employment standards and the requirements of the available position. 4.3 Should a Business Partner, board member, or medical staff member appear on the OIG Sanction List or GSA List, IHS and its affiliates may not contract or do business with that individual or company until the charges are resolved and it is clear the individual or company has been reinstated. 4.4 In the event that it is determined that an Ineligible Person is a Business Partner or employee, the Chief Financial Officer of the entity must be notified so that appropriate entries or corrections can be made to the CMS cost report. 4.5 Should an individual or company provide satisfactory evidence that they are not the individual or company that appears on the OIG Sanction List or GSA List, the individual or company may be considered eligible to do business with IHS and/or the affiliate. /s/ William B. Leaver William B. Leaver IHS President Page 4 of 10 09/09
5 Attachment A to Policy EXCLUSION SCREENING GUIDANCE AND TIPS In order to protect beneficiaries and control fraud and abuse the Federal Government has developed lists of individuals/entities that have been excluded or restricted in their participation in federally funded programs such as Federal Health Care Programs. Iowa Health System has established a policy () providing a standard requirement and process for screening individuals and/or entities to ensure IHS and its affiliates do not employ or develop a relationship with these excluded parties. Following are some guidelines and tips to aid in the screening of individuals/entities. Exclusion Lists There are two Federal exclusion lists that are used by IHS in the exclusion screening process. 1. List of Excluded Individuals / Entities (LEIE) This list is maintained by The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) and may also be referred to as the OIG list. This list contains individuals/entities that have been excluded from participation in HHS administered programs such as Medicare & Medicaid. This list may be found on the internet at 2. Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) This list is maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and may also be referred to as the GSA List. This list contains individuals/entities that have been excluded or restricted in their participation in federally funded programs by various government agencies such as HHS, Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), etc. This list may be found on the internet at While there is a great deal of overlap in the information presented in these two lists neither should be considered all inclusive and both should be used in the screening process. Searching the LEIE (OIG) Online Database The online search function for the LEIE database consists of three informational fields that may be searched (First Name, Last Name, Business Name). Following are some considerations to address when completing a search. A single field or any combination of the fields may be searched. Page 5 of 10 09/09
6 Searches are not case sensitive. Punctuation is a factor in the search. For example, Obrien will not match O Brien. Be aware of names that may be subject to multiple variations. For example, Robert, Rob, Bob, etc. Business names may be especially vulnerable to these variations especially in consideration of potential punctuation differences. (i.e. ABC Inc vs. A.B.C. Inc. vs. A B C Inc. vs. Alpha Beta Charlie Inc. ) Each field is searched as a partial string match. Therefore, a first name search on Rob will provide matches to Rob, Robert, Robyn, etc. This functionality is useful when searching for names that may have multiple variations. While up to five names may be searched at one time it is recommended that you search only one individual at a time. This will simplify review of the potential matches. However, consider searching up to five variations of an individual name. Here is an example of how the preceding factors may be used in a search. We ll say that Robert L O Brien needs to be screened. We may search for the following names within the LEIE online database: First Name: rob ; Last Name: obr First Name: bob ; Last Name: obr First Name: rob ; Last Name: o br First Name: bob ; Last Name: o br The combination of these searches would cover many possible variations of the name in question. Searching the EPLS (GSA) Online Database There are three types of searches that are available on the EPLS site. The searches consist of: Exact Name and SSN/TIN This is the most limited of the searches and should only be used for clearing potential matches as described in the Clearing EPLS (GSA) Potential Matches section. Multiple Names Gives the ability to search up to 5 names at once. It is recommended that you search only one individual at a time. This will Page 6 of 10 09/09
7 simplify review of the potential matches. However, consider searching up to five variations of an individual name. It also allows the search to be based on exact or partial name match. The differences in these searches will be discussed later. Advanced Search Allows searching on multiple database fields. The most notable search options are either an exact or partial name search. Following are some considerations to address when completing a search: Searches are not case sensitive. Names are in the following format: Last, First Middle Exact name searches must match the database exactly. This includes any punctuation. For example ABC Inc does not match ABC Inc.. This limits the effectiveness of the exact name search. Partial name searches are not dependent on punctuation. Partial name searches will search for each portion of the name to be anywhere in the name field. For example a search for David Peter will match to any record with David or Peter within the name. Unlike the LEIE (OIG) database searches, EPLS searches will not match to a partial string segment. Therefore, Peter will not match to Peterson and Rob will not match to Robert. During partial name searches you may require that multiple pieces of the name be present by using the AND function (must be in caps). For example a search for David AND Peter will match to records that have both David and Peter within the name. You may use wildcards within either an exact or partial name search. However, a wildcard can not be the first character in the search. The? character represents a single character and the * represents 0 or more characters. A search for David* would match to David, Davidson, David s, etc. Additional search guidance may be found on the EPLS website by clicking on the Search Help link. Here is an example of how the preceding factors may be used in a search. If Robert L O Brien needs to be screened you may perform the following Multiple Names searches using the partial name option: rob* AND obr* Page 7 of 10 09/09
8 bob AND obr* The combination of these searches would cover many possible variations of the name in question. Internal Audit Reports Periodically Internal Audit will perform electronic comparisons of the LEIE and EPLS lists to current lists of employees, vendors, providers, and board members. In addition to comparing names, comparisons are completing using criteria such as address, birth date, etc. The Internal Audit reports will contain the individual/entity name as found within IHS records and the potentially matching name as it appears in the EPLS/LEIE database. These potential matches can be reviewed by following the guidance in the Clearing Potential Matches section and using the EPLS/LEIE name provided. Clearing Potential Matches When a potential match to either of the databases is identified appropriate steps must be taken to confirm/disprove the existence of a match. Following are some factors to consider in this process. Tax Identification Number (TIN), which consists of either the Social Security Number (SSN) or Employer Identification Number (EIN), is the most effective matching criteria. TINs are not available for every excluded individual/entity and will most likely become less available in the future. Excluded individuals/entities may change locations from that reported in the databases. Excluded entities may have multiple business locations (corporate offices, factories, etc.) and the location which appears within the exclusion data base may not be the address with which you do business. Additional information sources may need to be used to confirm/disprove a potential match. Each database will be different in the approach needed to confirm/disprove the potential match. Guidance related to each database may be found in following sections. Clearing LEIE (OIG) Potential Matches Page 8 of 10 09/09
9 When a search is performed on the LEIE database a list of potential matches will be displayed. By clicking on the last name, a verification screen may be viewed that will provide additional information about the excluded party. If an information entry box and a button with the word Verify appear within the SSN/EIN section you may match the TIN on file with that of the excluded individual/entity. This is accomplished by typing the TIN (hyphens excluded) into the space provided and clicking on the Verify button. You will then receive a response as to whether the number you entered matches the number in the LEIE database. If the TIN is not available, in either your records or in the LEIE database, then you must use available information to confirm/disprove the potential match. This may involve obtaining additional information via internet searches, licensure review, etc. Clearing EPLS (GSA) Potential Matches When a search has been performed on the EPLS database a list of potential matches will be displayed. To clear the potential match using the TIN you will need to note the exact name (including punctuation) as displayed on the EPLS site. Then you will choose the Exact Name and SSN/TIN search option and enter the exact name, as noted previously, and the TIN (without hyphens). Carefully read the resulting message for the following: If the response indicates that the individual/entity is not in the database the name has probably been entered incorrectly. Complete the Partial Name search again and verify how the name is stored within the database. The Name matches but the TIN is unknown for the record. Return to the detail information for the individual/entity and use other available information to confirm/disprove the potential match. This may involve obtaining additional information via internet searches, licensure review, etc. The TIN did or did not match information within the database. Verify TIN entry was correct and confirm/disprove potential match. Additional considerations: When there is a high probability of a match, reviewing the CT (Cause & Treatment) code and the scope of the exclusion may be helpful. CT Code information may be found by clicking on the CT Code link within the detailed record. The treatment of the exclusion may not apply to the relationship we have with the entity. For example, the exclusion may only apply to a specific factory/location/circumstance. If there is not enough information within the EPLS system to confirm/disprove the potential match it may be necessary to contact the Page 9 of 10 09/09
10 excluding agency for additional information. Contact information is available by clicking on the Agency POC link within the detailed record. Confirmed & Undetermined Conclusions Any potential matches that can not be disproved should be brought to the attention of the Compliance Officer and/or designated individual in your facility for additional guidance and/or action. Additional Questions If you have additional questions contact the Compliance Officer or individual designated by your facility. Page 10 of 10 09/09
OIG/GSA Exclusion Review Policy HS 9006
OIG/GSA EXCLUSION REVIEW PURPOSE: Federal law prohibits entities that participate in federal health care programs (including Medicare, Medicaid, and other governmental programs), such as UCLA Healthcare,
UPDATED. Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion from Participation in Federal Health Care Programs
UPDATED Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion from Participation in Federal Health Care Programs Issued May 8, 2013 Updated Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion from Participation
TEMPLATE #2 I. SANCTION CHECK PROCEDURES INSTITUTIONAL COMPLIANCE OFFICE PROCEDURE # ICO - PR002 OVERVIEW
#2 I. SANCTION CHECK PROCEDURES OVERVIEW The Institutional Compliance Office (ICO) is responsible for the coordination of University sanction check procedures with various departments and administrative
()FFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
DEP.lliTMENT OF HEALTH 1.\.:' W Hcl\!1,\.'\1 SERYIC:E~ ()FFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL '.IASHI'iGTOO., DC 20201 SEP 2 7 2012 TO: Marilyn Tavenner Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
PROHIBITION AGAINST EMPLOYING OR CONTRACTING WITH INELIGIBLE PERSONS
PROHIBITION AGAINST EMPLOYING OR CONTRACTING WITH INELIGIBLE PERSONS Revised/Effective: 12/23/05 Reviewed: N/A Supersedes: 10/05/04 Screening of Employees, Providers, and Vendors/Contractors Originally
MSO/IPA Compliance Program
MSO/IPA Compliance Program PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC. MSO/IPA COMPLIANCE PROGRAM Coverage The terms of the Compliance Program set forth herein shall apply to, and govern, the medical group business
The Ideal Credentialing Standards: Best Practice Criteria and Protocol for Hospitals
The Ideal Credentialing Standards: Best Practice Criteria and Protocol for Hospitals Credentialing best practices include an evidence-based evaluation that verifies 13 specific criteria from primary sources.
Provider Entity Disclosure of Ownership, Controlling Interest and Management Statement
Provider Entity Disclosure of Ownership, Controlling Interest and Management Statement Page 1 of 6 UnitedHealthcare Community Plan ( UnitedHealthcare ) is required to collect disclosure of ownership, controlling
Service Provider Agreement
READ INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING - SIGNATURE * SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON PAGE 5 Return the provider enrollment application along with all applicable addendum(s) and attachments to the appropriate program
Arizona Department of Health Services Division of Behavioral Health Services PROVIDER MANUAL
Section 3.20 Credentialing and Recredentialing 3.20.1 Introduction 3.20.2 References 3.20.3 Scope 3.20.4 Did you know? 3.20.5 Definitions 3.20.6 Objectives 3.20.7 Procedures 3.20.7-A. General process for
CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGREEMENT I. PREAMBLE
CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. I. PREAMBLE Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. (Maxim)
Designing and Implementing a Corporate Compliance Program - Using the OIG Database to Determine Exclusion
Designing and Implementing a Corporate Compliance Program - Using the OIG Database to Determine Exclusion Tuesday, January 7, 2009 2:00 pm 3:00 PM, ET Moderator: Dianne De La Mare Speakers: Ken Burgess,
EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/04. SUBJECT: Primary Care Nurse Practitioners SECTION: CREDENTIALING POLICY NUMBER: CR-31
SUBJECT: Primary Care Nurse Practitioners SECTION: CREDENTIALING POLICY NUMBER: CR-31 EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/04 Applies to all products administered by the plan except when changed by contract Policy Statement:
Resident Credentialing Policy Wayne State University
Resident Credentialing Policy Wayne State University REQUIREMENTS FOR INITIAL RESIDENT APPOINTMENT Residency Office Responsibilities: 1. Resident Initial Appointment Recommendation Letter: Initial applications
Official Audit Report Issued April 20, 2016
Official Audit Report Issued April 20, 2016 (MassHealth) Review of Providers Excluded from Participating in the Medicaid Program For the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014 State House Room
MEDICAID PROGRAM INTEGRITY
United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate April 2016 MEDICAID PROGRAM INTEGRITY Improved Guidance
FWA Program. Program Description. Issued by: Regulatory Compliance Department
FWA Program Program Description Issued by: Regulatory Compliance Department July 2016 2016 FWA Program Description Page 1 of 16 Table of Contents Introduction Introduction..3 Definitions 4 Examples..6
OSF Healthcare System Pioneer Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Compliance Plan
OSF Healthcare System Pioneer Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Compliance Plan Approved: July 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Definitions...5 Introduction...8 Benefits of a Compliance Program... 10 Elements
CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND REHAB MEDICAL
I. PREAMBLE CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND REHAB MEDICAL Rehab Medical (Rehab) hereby enters into this Corporate
I. PREAMBLE TERM AND SCOPE OF THE CIA
CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND FIRST CALL AMBULANCE SERVICE, LLC I. PREAMBLE First Call Ambulance Service, LLC
Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training for Medicare and Medicaid Providers
Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training for Medicare and Medicaid Providers For Use By: Licensed affiliates and subsidiaries of Magellan Health Services, Inc. Contents and Agenda Define Fraud, Waste, and Abuse
Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health Credentialing Application for Prescribing Practitioners Delivering Services to DCFS Children
Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health Credentialing Application for Prescribing Practitioners Delivering Services to DCFS Children This application is exclusively for prescribing practitioners
MEDICARE DRUG INTEGRITY CONTRACTORS IDENTIFICATION
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL MEDICARE DRUG INTEGRITY CONTRACTORS IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL PART D FRAUD AND ABUSE Daniel R. Levinson Inspector General October 2009
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Medicare First Tier, Downstream, and Related Entity (FDR) Compliance Program Requirements
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FDR General Compliance & Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training and Standards/Code of Conduct 1. Why am I receiving notice to complete training for Aetna? 2. Why is this training necessary?
PHI Air Medical, L.L.C. Compliance Plan
Page No. 1 of 13 Introduction: The PHI Air Medical, L.L.C. is to be used by employees, contractors and vendors to get a high level understanding of the key regulatory requirements relating to our participation
THE DUKE UNIVERSITY GUIDE TO BACKGROUND CHECKS
Duke Human Resources THE DUKE UNIVERSITY GUIDE TO BACKGROUND CHECKS Contact the HRIC for questions: by phone at 919-684-5600 online at www.hr.duke.edu/about/ feedback or by email at [email protected] This document
Case Study Success with a. into a Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA)
Case Study Success with a Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) More than 100 affiliated physician practices and healthcare facilities Operations in multiple states More than 2,000 Covered Persons under
Accountable Care Organization. Medicare Shared Savings Program. Compliance Plan
Accountable Care Organization Participating In The Medicare Shared Savings Program Compliance Plan 2014 Corporate Location: 3190 Fairview Park Drive Falls Church, VA 22042 ARTICLE I INTRODUCTION This Compliance
AMERIGROUP DISCLOSURE FORM FOR A PROVIDER PERSON
AMERIGROUP DISCLOSURE FORM FOR A PROVIDER PERSON Directions: Use this form if you are applying for network participation as a Provider Person. If the addition of the Provider Person will change the Ownership
SECTION 18 1 FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE
SECTION 18 1 FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE Annual FW&A Training Required for Providers and Office Staff 1 Examples of Fraud, Waste and Abuse 2 Fraud, Waste and Abuse Program Policy 3 Suspected Non-Compliance
First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities (FDR) Medicare Compliance Program Guide
Quality health plans & benefits Healthier living Financial well-being Intelligent solutions First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities (FDR) Medicare Compliance Program Guide February 2016 72.03.801.1
BAPTIST PHYSICIAN ALLIANCE ACO AGREEMENT for MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM PARTICIPATION
BAPTIST PHYSICIAN ALLIANCE ACO AGREEMENT for MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM PARTICIPATION ( Physician Practice ) hereby agrees to become a Participant in the Medicare Shared Savings Program ( MSSP ) pursuant
Prepared by: The Office of Corporate Compliance & HIPAA Administration
Gwinnett Health System s Annual Education 2014 Corporate Compliance: Our Commitment to Excellence Prepared by: The Office of Corporate Compliance & HIPAA Administration Objectives After completing this
POLICY SUBJECT: EFFECTIVE DATE: 5/31/2013. To be reviewed at least annually by the Ethics & Compliance Committee COMPLIANCE PLAN OVERVIEW
Compliance Policy Number 1 POLICY SUBJECT: EFFECTIVE DATE: 5/31/2013 Compliance Plan To be reviewed at least annually by the Ethics & Compliance Committee COMPLIANCE PLAN OVERVIEW Sound Inpatient Physicians,
Law Department Policy No. L-3 Title:
I. SCOPE: Law Department Policy No. L-3 Page: 1 of 15 This policy applies to (1) Tenet Healthcare Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates (each, an Affiliate ); (2) any other entity
BCBSM MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE MANAGED CARE PROGRAM
BCBSM MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE MANAGED CARE PROGRAM Professional Provider Participation Agreement This agreement (Agreement) is between Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM), and the provider
OREGON PROPERLY VERIFIED CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OREGON PROPERLY VERIFIED CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID
Standard HR.7 All individuals permitted by law and the organization to practice independently are appointed through a defined process.
Credentialing and Privileging of Licensed Independent Practitioners The following standards apply to individuals permitted by law and the organization to provide patient care services without direction
OSF HealthCare. Compliance Plan
OSF HealthCare Compliance Plan Approved: June 1999 Revised: January 2000 Revised: February 2001 Revised: February 2005 Revised: July 2012 Revision Approved: September 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction...
CREDENTIALING POLICY FOR ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS
CREDENTIALING POLICY FOR ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS TABLE OF CONTENTS Article Page 1 DEFINITIONS.. 1 2 SCOPE AND OVERVIEW OF POLICY 2.1 Scope of Policy 3 2.2 Classification of Allied Health Professionals..
November 2009 Report No. 10-014. An Audit Report on The Department of Aging and Disability Services Home and Community-based Services Program
John Keel, CPA State Auditor An Audit Report on The Department of Aging and Disability Services Home and Community-based Services Program Report No. 10-014 An Audit Report on The Department of Aging and
MEDICARE COMPLIANCE FOLLOWUP REVIEW OF BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL MEDICARE COMPLIANCE FOLLOWUP REVIEW OF BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER Inquiries about this report may be addressed to the Office of Public Affairs
J:::'~~ c.4;t: Regional Inspector General for Audit Services. June 17,2008. Report Number: A-02-06-01025
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Office Of Inspector General Office Of Audit Services Region II Jacob K. Javlts Federal Building 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278 June 17,2008 Report Number: A-02-06-01025
HCCA Mark Eddy, CPA April 18, 2013. Credentialing and Privileging Process Review Guidelines
HCCA Mark Eddy, CPA April 18, 2013 Credentialing and Privileging Process Review Guidelines WHY DO WE DO THIS? 2 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Requirements for Hospital Medical Staff Privileging
CREDENTIALING PROCEDURES MANUAL
CREDENTIALING PROCEDURES MANUAL Page PART I Appointment Procedures 1 PART II Reappointment Procedures 5 PART III Delineation of Clinical Privileges Procedures 7 PART IV Leave of Absence, Reinstatement,
Medicaid Revocation of Medicare DME Suppliers
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Office of Inspector General The mission of the Office of Inspector General (OIG), as mandated by Public Law 95-452, as amended, is to protect the integrity of the Department
Description of a First Tier, Downstream, and Related Entity
We at Health Partners Plans (HPP) would like to thank you for your partnership with HPP and helping us to provide exceptional service to our Medicare beneficiaries. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Fraud, Waste and Abuse: Compliance Program. Section 4: National Provider Network Handbook
Fraud, Waste and Abuse: Compliance Program Section 4: National Provider Network Handbook December 2015 2 Our Philosophy Magellan takes provider fraud, waste and abuse We engage in considerable efforts
. 4 " ~ f.".2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. December 19,2003. Our Reference: Report Number A-O2-03-01016
. 4 " ~..+.-"..i"..,. f.".2 '" '" ~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Office of Audit Services Region II Jacob K. Javits Federal Building New York, New York 10278 (212)
CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND C.F. HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC
CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND C.F. HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC. D/B/A GAINESVILLE PAIN MANAGEMENT I. PREAMBLE (Gainesville)
FEHB Program Carrier Letter
FEHB Program Carrier Letter All Carriers U.S. Office of Personnel Management Healthcare and Insurance Letter No. 2014-29 Date: December 19, 2014 Fee-for-service [ 25 ] Experience-rated HMO [ 25 ] Community-rated
Combating Fraud, Waste, and Abuse
Combating Fraud, Waste, and Abuse On-Line Training The information contained in this presentation is intended to prevent and/or combat Fraud, Waste, and Abuse with respect to Medicare and other benefit
How and When to Disclose and Refund Overpayments
How and When to Disclose and Refund Overpayments Darrell D. Zurovec American Health Lawyers Association Long Term Care and the Law February 25 27, 2013 Medicare and Medicaid providers and suppliers have
Subject: Overview of Credentialing (Page 1 of 8)
Subject: Overview of Credentialing (Page 1 of 8) Objective: I. To ensure that Health Share/Tuality Health Alliance (THA) uses a well-defined credentialing and re-credentialing process for evaluating and
USA WRESTLING BACKGROUND SCREENING PROGRAM (Amended 12/04/12)
USA WRESTLING BACKGROUND SCREENING PROGRAM (Amended 12/04/12) Background Information As most are aware, USA Wrestling ( USAW ) implemented a voluntary background screening procedure in 2003, and will implement
Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training. Protecting the Health Care Investment. Section Three
Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training Protecting the Health Care Investment Section Three Section 1.2: Purpose According to the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association, the United States spends more than
Ruling No. 98-1 Date: December 1998
HCFA Rulings Department of Health and Human Services Health Care Financing Administration Ruling No. 98-1 Date: December 1998 Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) Rulings are decisions of the Administrator
CHAPTER 6: CREDENTIALING PROCEDURES
We want to help you become or continue as a participating in-network provider for our members. Please refer to this chapter for information about: Provider credentialing Provider recredentialing Provider
POLICY REGARDING ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSES, PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS AND OTHER CREDENTIALED HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS
MEDICAL-DENTAL STAFF BYLAWS, POLICIES, AND RULES AND REGULATIONS OF CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC POLICY REGARDING ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSES, PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS AND OTHER CREDENTIALED HEALTH CARE
SUBJECT: BUSINESS ETHICS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PROGRAM & PLAN (BERCPP)
Effective Date: 6/17/2008; 1/3/2007; 6/2/2004, BOD #04-028 Revised Date: 9/5/2012 Review Date: 9/13/2012 North Sound Mental Health Administration Section 2000-Compliance: Business Ethics and Regulatory
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE Dear Provider: Enclosed is the District of Columbia Medicaid provider enrollment application solely used for providers, who request to be considered for the Adult Substance
Management Advisory - The Transportation Security Administration's Failure to Address Two Recommendations to Improve the Efficiency and Effectiveness
Management Advisory - The Transportation Security Administration's Failure to Address Two Recommendations to Improve the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Its Office of Inspection July 6, 2015 July 6, 2015
Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid Integrity Program
Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicaid Integrity Program North Carolina Comprehensive Program Integrity Review Final Report Reviewers: Mark Rogers, Review
HPC Healthcare, Inc. Administrative/Operational Policy and Procedure Manual
Operational and Procedure Manual 1 of 7 Subject: Corporate Compliance Plan Originating Department Quality & Compliance Effective Date 1/99 Administrative Approval Review/Revision Date(s) 6/00, 11/99, 2/02,
/Diann M. Saltman/ for George M. Reeb Acting Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General Washington, D.C. 20201 March 2, 2011 TO: FROM: Donald M. Berwick, M.D. Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services /Diann M.
TITLE: Allied Health Professional Policy
TITLE: Allied Health Professional Policy Number: Version: Status: Current Type: Medical Staff Policy Author: Medical Staff Original Date: Revised Dates: Review Cycle: Triennial Deactivation Date: Facility:
EASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER SERVICES
EASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER SERVICES The Easter Seals Rehabilitation Center provides a wide range of services to enhance the independence of children and adults with disabilities and special needs
* SAMPLE * COMPLIANCE PROGRAM GROUP PRACTICE
[NOTE: This is a sample compliance plan based on OIG Compliance Program Guidance. Groups should modify it as appropriate to fit their circumstances] * SAMPLE * COMPLIANCE PROGRAM GROUP PRACTICE (Revised
Surgical Center of Greensboro/Orthopaedic Surgical Center Div of Surgical Care Affiliates
Allied Health Staff Application Instructions We are pleased to provide you with our Allied Health Staff application packet. Please do not write see attached or see resume or CV on the application. All
Data Bank Education Forum October 10-11, 2012 Denver, CO
Data Bank Education Forum October 10-11, 2012 Denver, CO Judy Rodgers, M.H.A., Senior Advisor Elizabeth Rezaizadeh, M.P.H., J.D., Policy Analyst U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources
INTEGRITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AND DR. MICHAEL ALLEN, D.P.M.
INTEGRITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND DR. MICHAEL ALLEN, D.P.M. AND LEXINGTON FOOT AND ANKLE CENTER, P.S.C. I. PREAMBLE Dr. Michael
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA PERFORMANCE AUDIT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE MEDICAID PROVIDER ELIGIBILITY AUGUST 2014 OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA
DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Civil Remedies Division In the Case of: Richard L. Pflepsen, D.C. Petitioner, - v. - The Inspector General. DATE: June 4, 1991 Docket
DIVISION OF MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE BOARD OF PHARMACY 4052 BALD CYPRESS WAY, BIN #C-04 TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-3254 (850) 245-4292
DIVISION OF MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE BOARD OF PHARMACY 4052 BALD CYPRESS WAY, BIN #C-04 TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-3254 (850) 245-4292 COMMUNITY PHARMACY PERMIT APPLICATION AND INFORMATION August 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 14-20299 CR-LENARD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. ARMANDO BUCHILLON, a.k.a Armando Buchillon Carames, and LIZETTE GARCIA, Defendants../ The Grand Jury charges
