HCANJ. 44 th Annual 20-Hour Symposium March 16, 2016 FIVE-STAR RATING SYSTEM & QUALITY MEASURES
|
|
|
- Helena Walton
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HCANJ 44 th Annual 20-Hour Symposium March 16, 2016 FIVE-STAR RATING SYSTEM & QUALITY MEASURES NELIA ADACI RNC, BSN, CDONA, C-NE, RAC-CT VICE PRESIDENT, The CHARTS Group
2 LEARNING OBJECTIVES: CURRENT 5-STAR RATING SYSTEM Appreciate the importance of the current 5- Star Rating System Learn the DOMAINS of the 5-Star Rating Scores: STATE HEALTH INSPECTION DOMAIN STAFFING DOMAIN QUALITY MEASURES DOMAIN Explore practical strategies for success in each domain; i.e. how to add stars and how NOT to lose stars
3 Much Above Average What is it? What Do The Stars Mean? System that assigns 1 to 5 Stars to every Medicare and/or Medicaid certified nursing home 4 RATINGS: Over-all Cumulative Rating & 3 Domains Above Average Average Below Average Much Below Average
4 IMPORTANCE: Now Imperative for Facility Survival The Original Goal: For Consumers MANAGED CARE, ACO S & Other Non-FFS Payor Sources : Use ratings to establish networks & partnerships CMS DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS/INITIATIVES: Will waive 3-day hospital stay to qualify for SNF stay if SNF has 3-Stars: e.g. Hospitals in CCJR model (starting Jan 1st ) Hospitals in Advanced ACO demonstration Liability Insurance Carriers: Use to set rates Trial Lawyers: Use to fish for cases & to support allegations of poor quality care
5 THE DOMAINS Stars calculated are based on: 1. State Health Inspections Forms the basis for number of stars 2. Nursing Home Staffing Information Can pull basic score in one direction or the other 3. Quality Measures: 11 QM S (3 Short-Stay & 8 Long-Stay) Can pull basic score in one direction or the other
6 STATE HEALTH INSPECTION RATING DOMAIN
7 HEALTH INSPECTION: COMPUTATION STATE HEALTH INSPECTIONS RATING = WEIGHTED DEFICIENCIES & # OF REPEAT VISITS From Standard, Complaint & SF Surveys (With some Caveats)
8 STATE HEALTH INSPECTIONS RATING: SCOPE & SEVERITY OF DEFICIENCIES STATE SURVEY RESULTS (Standard; Complaint & Special Focus Surveys): Points are assigned to individual health deficiencies according to their Scope & Severity Substandard Quality of Care = Additional points assigned Past Non-compliance & Severity is Immediate Jeopardy (i.e. J, K or L -level) = Points associated with a G level deficiency are assigned.
9 STATE HEALTH INSPECTIONS RATING: Standard Surveys 3 most recent Annual Inspection Surveys: Each deficiency is weighted by Scope and Severity More recent annual surveys weighted more heavily than earlier surveys STATE HEALTH INSPECTIONS: Most recent period (cycle 1) = 1/2 The previous period (cycle 2) = 1/3 The 2 ND prior survey (cycle 3) = 1/6
10 STATE HEALTH INSPECTIONS RATING: Complaint & Special Focus Surveys SUBSTANTIATED COMPLAINT INVESTIGATIONS & DEFICIENCIES FROM S.F. SURVEYS: Assigned to time period based on calendar year in which they occurred Includes the most recent 36 months of complaint investigations WEIGHTS: Within Most recent 12 months = 1/ months ago = 1/ months ago = 1/6
11 HEALTH INSPECTION SCORE: Weights for Different Types of Deficiencies ( )=Substandard QOC * = Past Non-Compliance and IJ SEVERITY ISOLATED PATTERN WIDESPREAD Immediate Jeopardy to Resident Health or Safety J 50 POINTS* K 100 POINTS* L 150 POINTS* (75 POINTS) (125 POINTS) (175 POINTS) Actual Harm that is Not Immediate Jeopardy G 20 POINTS H 35 POINTS I 45 POINTS (40 POINTS) (50 POINTS) No actual harm with potential WITH Potential for More than Minimal Harm that is NOT IJ D 4 POINTS E 8 POINTS F 16 POINTS (20 POINTS) No Actual Harm with Potential for Minimal Harm A 0 POINTS B 0 POINTS C 0 POINTS
12 STATE HEALTH INSPECTIONS RATING: REPEAT REVISITS Repeat Revisits - Number of repeat revisits required to confirm that correction of deficiencies have restored compliance: 1 St Revisit = NO POINTS 2 ND Revisit = 50% Health Inspection Score 3 RD Revisit = 70% Health Inspection Score 4 TH Revisit= 85% Health Inspection Score * Points from complaint deficiencies are added to health inspection score before calculating revisit points.
13 STATE HEALTH INSPECTIONS RATING: CUTPOINTS CUT-POINTS: Re-calibrated each month BUT rating for facility is held constant until a change in facility s survey deficiencies ITEMS THAT COULD CHANGE THE HEALTH INSPECTION SCORE: 1. A New Health Inspection Survey 2. A complaint or SF survey resulting in deficiencies 3. A 2 nd, 3 rd or 4 th Re-visit 4. Resolution of an IDR or I-IDR resulting in changes to scope and severity of deficiencies 5. The aging of complaint deficiencies (time period based on the calendar year in which complaint survey occurred)
14 STATE HEALTH INSPECTIONS RATING Step 1: Calculate weighted 3 year average survey score 3 Annual Inspection Surveys (Scope & Severity) Complaint Investigations & SF Survey (Scope & Severity) = 36 months Number of revisits to correct deficiencies. Step 2: Rank all facilities within each state based on their scores Step 3: Assign 1 to 5 stars based on ranking within each state
15 How to Avoid 1 or 2 stars on Survey Mock Surveys Be Proactive!!! No Substandard Quality Survey Know your State s Health Inspection Cut-points (updated monthly) Most common reason for deficiencies: Staff did not follow SNF policy, procedure, care plan or orders Substandard Quality of Care Deficiencies: F221 F226; F240 F258; F309 F333
16 STAFFING RATING DOMAIN
17 STAFFING RATING: RN HOURS & ALL NURSING STAFF HOURS 1. RN HOURS = (F39: DON) + (F40: Nurses with Administrative Duties*) + (F41: RN s) *Nurses with Administrative Duties = RNs & LPN s who perform RAI functions & do not perform direct care functions OR whose principal duties are spent conducting administrative functions 2. TOTAL STAFFING HOURS PER PATIENT DAY = RN Hours (F39+F40+F41) + LPN Hours (F42) + Nurse Aide Hours* *Nurse Aide Hours = (F43: C.N.A. s) + (F44: Aides in Training) + (F45: Medication Aides/Techs)
18 STAFFING RATING Reported Hours based on CMS-671 Form (LTC Facility Application for Medicare & Medicaid) Completed for Survey Census from the CMS 672 Form (Resident Census & Conditions of Residents) = Total Residents including Bed holds (on 1 st Day of survey) Expected Hours or Staffing Levels = calculated based on resident acuity using RUG III (v. 53) Categories Uses MDS Information from the last quarter from which the staffing data was collected Uses most recent info Can be composite from most recent comprehensive, full, quarterly, & PPS assessments for a particular resident National Average: RN = ; All Nursing =
19 STAFFING RATING: CALCULATION Hours Adjusted = (Hours Reported/Hours Expected) * Hours National Average Reported: Hours reported during annual survey Expected: Based on RUG III calculation of most recent MDS s (Quarter prior to survey ) National Average Hours per Resident per Day (Mean across all facilities): Registered Nurses = Total Nursing Staff (Aides + LPNs + RNs) = Total Nursing Staffing Example: 3 reported 6 expected = ½ x national average = ADJUSTED HOURS
20 STAFFING POINTS AND DOMAIN: RN RATING AND HOURS TOTAL STAFFING RATING AND HOURS (RN S, LPN S AND AIDES) < > < STAR 1-STAR 2-STARS 2-STARS 3-STARS STAR 2-STARS 3-STARS 3-STARS 3-STARS STARS 3-STARS 3-STARS 4-STARS 4-STARS STARS 3-STARS 4-STARS 4-STARS 4-STARS > STARS 3-STARS 4-STARS 4-STARS 5-STARS
21 How to avoid losing Stars on Staffing? To avoid losing a star based on Staffing RN Hours PPD: >0.378 All Nursing Staff Hours PPD: >3.660 To add a star based on your Staffing RN Hours PPD: >0.513 All Nursing Staff Hours PPD: >4.173
22 STAFFING RATING CHANGES (2/2015) Changed the criteria to achieve 3 or 4 stars: A rating of 3 stars on either RN or All Nursing Staff no longer results in 4 stars; Now it equals 3 stars for the Staffing Component
23 UPCOMING STAFFING RATING CHANGES CMS plans to audit your staffing payroll data and MDS data. PBJ (Payroll-Based Journal) Voluntary as of October 1, 2015; Mandatory as of July 1, Change in Tool to calculate Staffing Rating may not be implemented until late 2017 or early 2018.
24 QUALITY MEASURES RATING DOMAIN MDS 3.0
25 CURRENT QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING 3 SHORT-STAY MEASURES % SELF-REPORTED MODERATE TO SEVERE PAIN % NEW OR WORSENED PRESSURE ULCERS % NEWLY RECEIVED AN ANTIPSYCHOTIC MEDICATION
26 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING 8 LONG-STAY MEASURES % SELF-REPORTED MOD. TO SEVERE PAIN % OF HIGH RISK PRESSURE ULCERS % FALLS WITH MAJOR INJURY % UTI % INCREASED NEED FOR ADL HELP % CATHETER INSERTED & LEFT IN BLADDER % PHYSICAL RESTRAINTS % RESIDENTS WHO RECEIVED AN ANTIPSYCHOTIC MED
27 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING: CHANGES in FEBRUARY 2015 CMS has changed how the QM component ratings are calculated which impacts your overall ratings - 2/2015 Added 2 new QM s (Antipsychotics) 2/2015
28 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING: CHANGES announced in the March 3 RD SNF-ODF New Measures are being added to Five Star April 2016, CMS will begin publicly reporting six new quality measures (QMs) four short-stay measures (three claims-based and one MDS-based) and two MDS-based long-stay QMs on Nursing Home Compare. July 2016, 5 of those 6 new QMs will begin to be included in the Five Star Quality Rating System until they are fully incorporated effective in January 2017.
29 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING: CHANGES announced in the March 3 RD SNF-ODF 6 New QMs are: 1. Percentage of short-stay residents who were successfully discharged to the community (Claims-based)* 2. Percentage of short-stay residents who have had an outpatient emergency department (ED) visit (Claims-based)* 3. Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after a nursing home admission (Claims-based)* 4. Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function (MDS-based)* 5. Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened (MDS-based)* 6. Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication (MDS-based)
30 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING: CHANGES announced in the March 3 RD SNF-ODF HANDY TOOLS TO HAVE: CMS s Slides (via Abt Associates) - provides key information about the new six QMs, including numerator and denominator summaries. (See Handout) AANAC s Charts Explains what s currently known about each QM (See Hand-out)
31 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING: CHANGES announced in the March 3 RD SNF-ODF Check your 5-STAR Preview Reports: April - New QMs will be part of the normal Five Star Preview Report process (typically between the 8th th and the 15 th of the month). NOTE: CMS won t be able to provide information about how the five new Five Star QMs will impact each facility s QM rating effective with the April reports, stressed officials. That information won t be available until we get closer to July. But we will be able to give you the most current numbers, and you will be able to see how you do relative to the national rating system. At the same time, we are going to be working with a coalition of groups to assemble a set of tools that can help you with quality improvement efforts you may want to engage in. While new QMs will eventually be incorporated into the CASPER quality measure reports, CMS officials don t have a timeline available.
32 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING: CHANGES announced in the March 3 RD SNF-ODF CMS will soon update the MDS 3.0 Quality Measures User Manual to reflect the exact specifications for the three new MDS-based QMs, said officials. For the claims-based measures, we will probably issue a separate manual, CMS added. The methodology and data sources are pretty different than they are for the MDS measures. In addition, CMS plans to update the Five Star Quality Rating System Technical Users Guide, said officials. We probably will update that closer to the July launch.
33 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING: CHANGES announced in the March 3 RD SNF-ODF CMS will soon update the MDS 3.0 Quality Measures User Manual to reflect the exact specifications for the three new MDS-based QMs, said officials. For the claims-based measures, we will probably issue a separate manual, CMS added. The methodology and data sources are pretty different than they are for the MDS measures. In addition, CMS plans to update the Five Star Quality Rating System Technical Users Guide, said officials. We probably will update that closer to the July launch.
34 USE OF MDS ASSESSMENTS Software uses assessments in several different ways to calculate the QM s. For most QM's, looks for specific information on the target assessment For some, compares initial assessment and subsequent assessment. For some, compares target assessment with a prior assessment. The other method is to look at all assessments in the entire episode that is the look back scan.
35 QM Component Rating Methodology Uses 3 most recent quarters available: Step 1: Assign 20, 40, 60, 80 or 100 points for each QM based on QM rate against a set of threshold cut-points (Old Method =Based on 1 point increments) Step 2: Add up points for all 11 QMs Step 3: Compare Aggregate score of 11 QMs against threshold cut-points to assign Stars Change from previous method by rebasing threshold cut points to account for 11 QMs and past high rates of achievement
36 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING SCORING RULES: THRESHOLDS SHORT-STAY: NEW OR WORSENED PRESSURE ULCERS = Facilities ranked accordingly 100 POINTS = Facilities achieving the Best Possible Score (0% of Residents Triggering the QM) = 1/3 of facilities 75 POINTS = (23% of Facilities) 50 POINTS = (23% of Facilities) 25 POINTS: = Poorest Performing Facilities (23% of Facilities)
37 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING SCORING RULES: THRESHOLDS FOR SHORT-STAY: Anti-psychotic Medications Facilities grouped into quintiles based on National Distribution of the QM - 20 POINTS: Poorest Performing 20% of facilities - 40 POINTS: 20% of Facilities - 60 POINTS: 20% of Facilities - 80 POINTS: 20% of Facilities POINTS: Best Performing 20% of Facilities
38 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING SCORING RULES: THRESHOLDS FOR SHORT-STAY: Pain and FOR LONG-STAY: Pain; ADL Decline; Pressure Ulcers; Catheter; UTI; Falls with Major Injury Facilities grouped into quintiles based on National Distribution of the QM (except for ADL = State) - 20 POINTS: 1 st Quintile (Poorest Performing) - 40 POINTS: 2 nd Quintile - 60 POINTS: 3 rd Quintile - 80 POINTS: 4 th Quintile POINTS: 5 th Quintile (Best Performing)
39 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING SCORING RULES: THRESHOLDS FOR LONG-STAY: PHYSICAL RESTRAINTS 100 POINTS = Facilities achieving the Best Possible Score (0% of Residents Triggering the QM) = 60% or 3 Quintiles of facilities 60 POINTS = Middle Performing Facilities (20% or 1 Quintile) 20 POINTS: = Poorest Performing Facilities (20% or 1 Quintile)
40 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING SCORING RULES: THRESHOLDS FOR LONG-STAY: Anti-psychotic Medications Facilities grouped into quintiles based on National Distribution of the QM - 20 POINTS: Poorest Performing 20% of facilities - 40 POINTS: 23.3% of Facilities - 60 POINTS: 23.3% of Facilities - 80 POINTS: 23.3% of Facilities POINTS: Best Performing 10% of Facilities
41 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING SCORING RULES All 11 QM s are given EQUAL WEIGHT The points are summed across all QM s to create a TOTAL Score for each Facility TOTAL POSSIBLE SCORE = 220 POINTS 1100 POINTS All QM s except for ADL Measure are based on National Distribution Rationale: ADL Measure appears to be particularly influenced by differences in State Medicaid Policies governing LTC
42 QM S FOR FIVE STAR RATING STAR CUT-POINTS QM RATING POINT RANGE FOR MDS QM SUMMARY SCORE 1 STAR STARS STARS STARS STARS 760 1,100 42
43 Quality Measure Rates & Points How to Achieve 5 Stars in Quality Measures: Add 1 star by averaging >69 points per QM 1 Star in Quality Measures: You will lose 1 star if you average <49 points per QM
44 Overall Rating (Composite Measure) Step 1 Health Inspection Rating Start with Health Inspection Rating Step 2 Staffing Rating Add 1 star for 4- or 5-Star Staffing & > Survey Rating Subtract 1 star for 1- Star Staffing Overall Rating Step 3 Quality Measures Rating (QMs) Add 1 star for 5- Star QMs Subtract 1 star for 1-Star QMs If you are 1-Star in Health Inspections, you can only add 1 STAR For a SFF that has not graduated: Maximum = 3 Stars
45 REACH FOR 5 STARS STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS
46 ADD STARS; DO NOT LOSE STARS!!! Make sure you add a star to your survey rating based on your Staffing Levels Quality Measures Do not lose a star because of your Staffing Levels Quality Measures
47 ALIGNING YOUR STARS Any new inspection survey or complaint investigation in your facility can change rating CASPER staffing data is added annually after annual health inspection survey Case-Mix adjustment may change quarterly QMs are updated quarterly Mid-month in January, April, July, October
48 Aligning Your Stars Analyzing Five-Star-related scores point-by-point may not be best use of time Focus efforts on bottom-line issues up front Quality of care Staffing levels consistent with acuity Accurate MDS Coding Establish effective QAPI Programs Improves care, surveys, resident and staff satisfaction, and Five-Star Rating
49 RESOURCES 5-Star Rating Technical User s Guide (Updated 2/2015) MDS 3.0 Quality Measures User s Manual (version 9.0) Home Compare THANK YOU! QUESTIONS?
Objectives. Objectives. The Facility Compliance Program Handbook 3/11/2016. Training 1
Understanding the Five Star Quality Rating System Design For Nursing Home Compare Nathan Shaw RN, BSN, MBA, LHRM, RAC CT 3.0 Director of Clinical Reimbursement March 23rd, 2015 Objectives Objectives Provide
Five Star Rating System Tip Sheet
Five Star Rating System Tip Sheet In December 2008, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) enhanced its Nursing Home Compare public reporting site to include a set of quality ratings for each
SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES TO FIVE STAR ANNOUNCED BY CMS. Mark Parkinson AHCA/NCAL President & CEO All member call February 13 th, 2015
SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES TO FIVE STAR ANNOUNCED BY CMS Mark Parkinson AHCA/NCAL President & CEO All member call February 13 th, 2015 AHCA Requests to CMS Do not go back to a curve Phase in any changes Rebasing
Learning Objectives 4/19/2016. The Five-Star Ratings Have Changed IMPROVING YOUR CMS FIVE-STAR QUALITY RATING KAY HASHAGEN, PT, MBA, RAC-CT
IMPROVING YOUR CMS FIVE-STAR QUALITY RATING KAY HASHAGEN, PT, MBA, RAC-CT Learning Objectives How to analyze the current Star Rating in each area Evaluate current operations to determine the most critical
Understanding CMS 5-Star Rating System
Understanding CMS 5-Star Rating System Michelle M. Pandolfi, LMSW, MBA, LNHA, PMP Director, Consulting Services Qualidigm This material was prepared by the New England Quality Innovation Network-Quality
Five-Star Nursing Home Quality Rating System
Five-Star Nursing Home Quality Rating System This is a summary of the information contained in the CMS Technical User s Guide July 2012. The guide in its entirety can be found at CMS.gov. Since the launch
Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Year Five Report [Public Version]
Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Year Five Report [Public Version] Final Report June 16, 2014 Prepared for Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) AGG/Research Contracts & Grants
CMS 5-Star Quality Rating. Reviewing How, Why and What are OUR Stars!
CMS 5-Star Quality Rating Reviewing How, Why and What are OUR Stars! FIVE - STAR Fact, Fiction & Strategies Discussion for OCAHF June 25, 2014 By Chris Jung, ehealth Data Solutions What is 5-Star Quality
Understanding the 5-Star Ratings and Quality Measures
Understanding the 5-Star Ratings and Quality Measures Erica Holman, LMSW, LNHA, CDP Evolucent Risk Management Consultant Learner Objectives Describe the CMS 5-Star Rating system Define the relationship
Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide. February 2015
Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide February 2015 Introduction In December 2008, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) enhanced its Nursing
Bradley N. Shiverick. Senior Vice President Healthcare Analytics. [email protected] Office 256.279.6802 cell 256.677.8546
Bradley N. Shiverick Senior Vice President Healthcare Analytics [email protected] Office 256.279.6802 cell 256.677.8546 Need Help? [Toll Free] 800.765.8998 [email protected] Agenda Five Star Rating
Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide. March 2009
Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide March 2009 (Revised April 1) Introduction The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has enhanced its Nursing
Technical Guide to the CalQualityCare.org Ratings: Nursing Facilities. May 2015
Technical Guide to the CalQualityCare.org Ratings: Nursing Facilities May 2015 Charlene Harrington, PhD, RN Janis O Meara, MPA Leslie Ross, PhD University of California San Francisco Department of Social
GAO NURSING HOMES. CMS Needs Milestones and Timelines to Ensure Goals for the Five-Star Quality Rating System Are Met
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees March 2012 NURSING HOMES CMS Needs Milestones and Timelines to Ensure Goals for the Five-Star Quality Rating System
Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide
Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide July 2010 Introduction The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has enhanced its Nursing Home Compare public
9/28/2015. Nursing Home Quality Measures - Achieving 5 Stars. Nursing Home Quality Measures Achieving 5 Stars
Welcome the webinar will begin shortly! Nursing Home Quality Measures - Achieving 5 Stars Audio for this presentation is being broadcast, so if you have not already done so, please enable the sound on
Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide
Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide February 2009 Introduction The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has enhanced its Nursing Home Compare
Thank You for Joining!
Thank You for Joining! New England Nursing Home Quality Care Collaborative Massachusetts Learning & Sharing Webinar: QAPI Data Techniques August 25, 2015 Call-In Number: 855-309-6568 Access Code: 7523186
Are Your Stars in Alignment? CMS 671 & 672: Data Accuracy and Their Role in the Five-Star Quality Rating System
Are Your Stars in Alignment? CMS 671 & 672: Data Accuracy and Their Role in the Five-Star Quality Rating System Today s Star Chart Introductions Overview of Today s Program Coding and auditing Forms 671/672
Background. Quality Measures. Onsite Inspections. Staffing Levels. July 19, 2012 4/16/2015. 5 STAR How Does the MDS Impact It?
Background 5 STAR How Does the MDS Impact It? Carol Siem Clinical Educator QIPMO December 18, 2008 Five Star Quality Rating System was added to the Nursing Home Compare website Onsite inspections Quality
Ohio Department of Health Division of Quality Assurance Quarterly Nursing Home Report Issue 4, April 2012
Ohio Department of Health Division of Quality Assurance Quarterly Nursing Home Report Issue 4, April 2012 Quarterly Nursing Home Report April 2012 This report provides information on selected indicators
PEPPER, CASPER/ OSCAR, QM and 5 Star Reports. Lisa Thomson Vice President www.pathwayhealth.com
PEPPER, CASPER/ OSCAR, QM and 5 Star Reports Lisa Thomson Vice President www.pathwayhealth.com Objectives Identify the purpose of the PEPPER and CASPER (OSCAR) report Identify the purpose of the Quality
Leadership Summit for Hospital and Post-Acute Long Term Care Providers May 12, 2015
Leveraging the Continuum to Avoid Unnecessary Utilization While Improving Quality Leadership Summit for Hospital and Post-Acute Long Term Care Providers May 12, 2015 Karim A. Habibi, FHFMA, MPH, MS Senior
2016 Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement Plan
HEALTH CARE COMMUNITIES POLICY STATEMENT 2016 Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement Plan DEPARTMENT(S): Quality Management/Compliance Org.: 01/01/16 Rev: 05/18/16 Vision: Where the Spirit creates
Improving Dementia Care and Reducing Unnecessary Use of Antipsychotic Medications in Nursing Homes
Improving Dementia Care and Reducing Unnecessary Use of Antipsychotic Medications in Nursing Homes Alice Bonner, PhD, RN Division of Nursing Homes Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for
Home Health Value-Based Purchasing. April 6, 2016 12:00-3:45 pm
Home Health Value-Based Purchasing April 6, 2016 12:00-3:45 pm Learning Objectives Understand the changing health care landscape, including various models of value-based purchasing Learn how the HHVBP
Trends in Publicly Reported Nursing Facility Quality Measures
Trends in Publicly Reported Nursing Facility Quality Measures American Health Care Association Reimbursement and Research Department January 2011 Trends in Publicly Reported Nursing Facility Quality Measures
Quality Star Ratings on Medicare.gov
Quality Star Ratings on Medicare.gov August 2015 2015 CMS National Training Program Workshop August 10 11 St. Louis, MO Quality Star Ratings Part of a larger effort at DHHS to transform our health care
OREGON PROPERLY VERIFIED CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OREGON PROPERLY VERIFIED CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID
Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System
Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Payment Rule Brief FINAL RULE Program Year: FFY 2016 Overview and Resources On August 4, 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
MDS Part 1: Section GG What You Need to Know about Coding the New Section GG
MDS Part 1: Section GG What You Need to Know about Coding the New Section GG Presented by: Amy Franklin, RN, RAC-MT, AHIMA approved ICD-10CM & PCS Trainer, Curriculum Development Specialist 1 Faculty Disclosure
MDS 3.0 QUALITY MEASURE (QM) REPORTS
11 MDS 3.0 QUALITY MEASURE (QM) REPORTS GENERAL INFORMATION...2 INTRODUCTION...2 SUPPORTING QM CONCEPTS...2 ACCESSING THE MDS 3.0 QM REPORTS...4 MDS 3.0 FACILITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT...5 MDS 3.0 FACILITY
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary (MSPB) Measure Presentation Question & Answer Transcript Moderator: Bethany Wheeler, BS Hospital VBP Program Support Contract Lead Hospital Inpatient Value, Incentives,
The Role of The Physician In Improving Nursing Home Quality. Jonathan M. Evans MD MPH CMD President, AMDA
The Role of The Physician In Improving Nursing Home Quality Jonathan M. Evans MD MPH CMD President, AMDA Questions For Discussion: What should residents and families expect from their physician in the
Reading the Stars: Nursing Home Quality Star Ratings, Nationally and by State
Reading the Stars: Nursing Home Quality Star Ratings, Nationally and by State Cristina Boccuti, Giselle Casillas, Tricia Neuman About 1.3 million people receive care each day in over 15,500 nursing homes
November 6, 2012 By Certified Mail
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Midwest Division of Survey and Certification Chicago Regional Office 233 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60601-5519
Mary Heim, HPR Social Work Specialist. Kate JohnsTon, Program Specialist. Posted 10/27/2015 Co.
7 09/30 Mary Heim, HPR Social Work Specialist 30 Kate JohnsTon, Program Specialist 10/19 Posted 10/27/2015 Co. Protecting, Maintaining and Improving the Health of Minnesotans CMS Certification Number (CCN):
AACN CSI CAUTI s Angels. Marie Szalanski RN, CNIII Elizabeth Lockhart BSN RN, CNII Amanda Gress RN, CNII Barbara Gabriel BSN RN, CNIII
AACN CSI CAUTI s Angels Marie Szalanski RN, CNIII Elizabeth Lockhart BSN RN, CNII Amanda Gress RN, CNII Barbara Gabriel BSN RN, CNIII Duke Regional Hospital Critical Care Unit U.S. News & World Report
Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process
Commissioner s Office 625 Robert St. N., Suite 500 P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, MN 55164-0975 (651) 201-5000 Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process Minnesota Department of Health
National Trends in Medicare Alternative Payment Models. James Michel Senior Director, Medicare Reimbursement & Policy AHCA
National Trends in Medicare Alternative Payment Models James Michel Senior Director, Medicare Reimbursement & Policy AHCA Discussion Review of CMS priorities and goals related to shifting Medicare spending
Quality Assurance Performance Improve: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Proactive Care
Quality Assurance Performance Improve: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Proactive Care Bill Lampe PT, DPT, MS Clinical Director, United States SCA/TENA Objectives Why QAPI Working knowledge of the 5 Elements
Cheryl Shiffer, RN, BSN, RAC-CT
Cheryl Shiffer, RN, BSN, RAC-CT Center for Policy and Innovation Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS) RAI Panel, Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) PRESENTED BY Identify
Tennessee Health Care Innovation Initiative. Provider Stakeholder Group Meeting
Tennessee Health Care Innovation Initiative Provider Stakeholder Group Meeting May 21, 2014 Agenda Update on the episodes of care reporting Payment and delivery reform for LTSS 1 Update on the episodes
2015 Annual Convention
2015 Annual Convention Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 Time: 11:30 am 1:00 pm Location: Gaylord National Harbor Resort and Convention Center, National Harbor 11 Title: Activity Type: Speaker: Managing
Percent of Low-Risk Residents. Who Lose Control of Their Bowels or Bladder. Long Stay Quality Measure (QM)
Percent of Low-Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowels or Bladder Long Stay Quality Measure (QM) Maureen Valvo, BSN, RN, RAC-CT Sr. Quality Improvement Specialist Objectives: Become familiar with
CMS Nursing Home Five Star Rating System. Discussion Guide. Meeting with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
CMS Nursing Home Five Star Rating System Discussion Guide Meeting with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services January 22, 2009 The Alliance for Quality Nursing Home Care, The American Health Care
PENNSYLVANIA PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION
PENNSYLVANIA PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION Hickory Pointe, Suite 125, 2250 Hickory Road, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 (610) 828-8890 - Fax: (610) 825-0688 - E-mail: [email protected]
Quality Measure Focus: Incontinence
Quality Measure Focus: Incontinence Keith Chartier, MPH Clinical Project Manager Elaine Nelson, RN, RAC-CT Clinical Project Manager (HSAG) August 25, 2015 Objectives 2 1 How Would It Make You Feel? Embarrassed
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS HOSPITAL & HEALTH SCIENCES SYSTEM: FINANCIAL REPORT AND SYSTEM DASHBOARDS May 29, 2013
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS HOSPITAL & HEALTH SCIENCES SYSTEM: FINANCIAL REPORT AND SYSTEM DASHBOARDS May 29, 2013 Office of the Vice President for Health Affairs Board of Trustees Spring Chicago Meeting UI
Objectives. Objectives 4/5/2014
Session: T32 A True Person Centered Restorative Nursing Program- Individualized Care at it s Best! Presented By: Sue LaGrange, RN, BSN, NHA Director of Education Pathway Health (651) 964-4946 Objectives
SANDY STAMES, RN, BSN, MBA, RAC - CT
ALC HEALTHCARE NETWORK, INC. 818.980.4322 CAREER SUMMARY Nursing and business executive with over 25 years experience in healthcare operations and management. Provides executive leadership and consulting
REV UP Your Restorative Program for Quality! Susan LaGrange, RN, BSN, NHA Director of Education Pathway Health Services, Inc.
REV UP Your Restorative Program for Quality! Susan LaGrange, RN, BSN, NHA Director of Education Pathway Health Services, Inc. 1 Objectives After attending this presentation, the attendees will be able
Outpatient Quality Reporting Program
Outpatient Quality Reporting Program Hitting the Highlights: Changes, Reports, Tools, and FAQs Questions & Answers Moderator: Karen VanBourgondien, BSN Education Coordinator Speaker: Pam Harris, BSN Project
Irene Fleshner, RN, MHSA, FACHE SVP, Strategic Nursing Initiatives Genesis HealthCare Principal, Reno, Davis and Associates, Inc.
Irene Fleshner, RN, MHSA, FACHE SVP, Strategic Nursing Initiatives Genesis HealthCare Principal, Reno, Davis and Associates, Inc. Independent Living Continuing Care Retirement Community Home Care Assisted
Restorative Care. Policy, Procedures and Training Package
Restorative Care Policy, Procedures and Training Package Release Date: December 17, 2010 Disclaimer The Ontario Association of Non-Profit Homes and Services for Seniors (OANHSS) Long-Term Care Homes Act
Putting Your License on the Line: Understanding IDFPR s New Enforcement Actions. 62 nd Annual IHCA Convention & Trade Show September 12, 2012
Putting Your License on the Line: Understanding IDFPR s New Enforcement Actions 62 nd Annual IHCA Convention & Trade Show September 12, 2012 The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Home Health Compare (HHC) Star Ratings
I. General IQ1: IA1: IQ2: IA2: IQ3: IA3: IQ4: IA4: What is the purpose of HHC Star Ratings and why is CMS choosing to add them to HHC now? The Affordable Care Act calls for transparent, easily-understood,
Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process
Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process Report to the Minnesota Legislature Minnesota Department of Health Federal Fiscal Year 2009 Released Commissioner s Office 625 Robert
Department of Veterans Affairs VHA HANDBOOK 1143.2 Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC 20420 June 4, 2004
Department of Veterans Affairs VHA HANDBOOK 1143.2 Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC 20420 June 4, 2004 VHA COMMUNITY NURSING HOME OVERSIGHT PROCEDURES 1. REASON FOR ISSUE: This Veterans Health
Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System
Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System May 5, 2015 Payment Rule Brief PROPOSED RULE Program Year: FFY 2016 Overview, Resources, and Comment Submission On May 17, the Centers for Medicare
Ohio Department of Health Division of Quality Assurance Minimum Daily Average Staffing Survey Tool 1/28/2002
Ohio Department of Health Division of Quality Assurance Minimum Daily Average Staffing Survey Tool 1/28/2002 1 Answers the following questions related to resident needs: D. Are the nursing needs of the
Public Health and Health Planning Council
Public Health and Health Planning Council Project # 141044-E Saratoga Center for Care, LLC d/b/a Saratoga Center for Rehab and Skilled Nursing Care Program: Residential Health Care Facility County: Saratoga
Compliance Audit Tool
CMS FY 2011 Top 10 Hospice Survey Deficiencies Compliance Audit Tool National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization www.nhpco.org/regulatory This audit tool is based on CMS s national aggregated analysis
