# [ 299 ] THE SHORTEST PATH THROUGH MANY POINTS

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 [ 299 ] THE SHORTEST PATH THROUGH MANY POINTS BY JILLIAN BEARDWOOD, J. H. HALTON AND J. M. HAMMERSLEY Received 11 March 1958 ABSTRACT. We prove that the length of the shortest closed path through n points in a bounded plane region of area v is 'almost always' asymptotically proportional to *J(nv) for large n; and we extend this result to bounded Lebesgue sets in ^-dimensional Euclidean space. The constants of proportionality depend only upon the dimensionality of the space, and are independent of the shape of the region. We give numerical bounds for these constants for various values of k; and we estimate the constant in the particular case k = 2. The results are relevant to the travelling-salesman problem, Steiner's street network problem, and the Loberman-Weinberger wiring problem. They have possible generalizations in the direction of Plateau's problem and Douglas' problem. The problem of determining the shortest closed path through a given set of n points is often called the 'travelling-salesman problem', particularly in the literature on operational research and linear programming: see for example, (7), (11), (12), (20). A travelling salesman, starting at and finally returning to his depot in a certain town, has to visit (» 1) other towns by the shortest possible route. If n is at all large, it is prohibitively laborious to calculate the total mileages for each of the (n 1)! orders in which the towns may be visited, and to choose the smallest total. There are, however, systematic numerical methods ((21), (23)) of computing the optimum order with a practical amount of labour; though even with these the labour is not light and will usually demand the services of an electronic computer. On the other hand, given a map of the towns, it is not too hard to draw a path which looks pretty much the shortest; and, for practical purposes, such a path could be used with confidence if we knew that its length was nearly that of the actual shortest path. But no explicit formula for the latter exists; and indeed any exact formula, depending as it must on the detailed structure of the distances between pairs of towns, would presumably be too cumbersome to be of any value. As a workable substitute for an exact formula, we shall derive a simple asymptotic formula for the shortest length when n is large. Despite its simplicity, this formula holds under surprisingly general conditions. When handling the problem numerically, one may insert as data the actual road mileages between pairs of towns. However, in an analytical approach, where we are deliberately avoiding the detailed distances between pairs of towns, it is convenient to take as the distance between two towns the length of the straight line joining them. This will not affect the result provided that the road mileage is effectively a known constant multiple of the straight-line distance. This proviso is probably met in the large, though in the small it may well be violated. For instance, superficially it might seem that one of the applications of the problem was to the delivery of telegrams in a city. Speed of delivery and operating costs are conflicting factors in a telegraph service. To have to deliver each telegram (not surcharged for special delivery) immediately upon receipt at the delivery office would call for an uneconomically large force of messengers. Accordingly, such telegrams are allowed to accumulate at the

2 300 JILLIAN BBARDWOOD, J. H. HALTON AND J. M. HAMMERSLEY delivery office until a small number nhave arrived; whereupon a messenger delivers all n in a single tour of their destinations. Hence one seeks that value of n which provides the best compromise between the delay caused when n is too large and the delivery expenses when n is very small. The rate of arrival of telegrams at the post office and the delivery time for a batch of n telegrams both affect the answer. This delivery time depends upon the length of the shortest route through the n destinations; but it also depends upon other factors, such as the congestion of certain city streets or restrictions in the number of bridges over rivers and railways (13). Local complications of this kind will probably vitiate application of the theory to small regions, especially if n is not very large. The example just cited raises another complexion of the problem. The points to be visited may be distributed at random over a certain region; and the policy decision on the optimum value of n for a single delivery must rest not on the mileage through n given points but rather on the distribution of mileage through n random points. This random version of the problem also arises in connexion with agricultural surveys ((15), (18)). Previous work on the shortest path through n random points has concentrated on the expected value of the shortest length. We shall show that a much stronger result holds, namely, that this random shortest length is asymptotically equal to a non-random function of n with probability one. Thus for large n the distinction between the random and the non-random versions of the problem effectively vanishes: indeed it is this fact which ensures the existence of a simple result in the non-random case. We shall also mention Steiner's street network problem (2), and an interesting related problem of connecting terminals in electronic equipment using the minimum amount of wire (17). Hereafter for brevity we shall call a shortest closed path a tour, and speak of the tour-length through a set of points. The points will be distributed in ^-dimensional Euclidean space 31; and, as already mentioned, we take the distance between two points to be the ordinary Euclidean distance. Except when the contrary is explicitly stated, we assume k ^ 2; the reason being that the case k = 1 is slightly anomalous and, anyway, rather trivial. We use German capitals for point sets in 9t; and, without further mention, we always assume that these point sets (with the sole exception of 91 itself) are bounded. In certain cases (explicitly mentioned) we assume that these sets are Lebesgue sets and sometimes one of the conventions (explained later) automatically implies that they are. We use boldface capitals for sequences of points in 9t: thus P = P 1; P a,... We write P n for the first n points of P: thus P n = P V P 2,...,P n. We write l(~p n ) for the tour-length through P. The tour through points P^P^,...,P 7l in a set will not necessarily be confined if ( is not convex. The closure of a set (S is written (. If is a Lebesgue set, denotes its Lebesgue measure. j...dv is integration with respect to Lebesgue measure. The expected value of a random variable x is written Sx. To state a preliminary result first, we shall prove that there exists an absolute constant a k such that Um sup TC_< fc _ 1)/fc Z( pn) ^ a^g)]* (1)

3 The shortest path through many points 301 whenever P lies within (. This bound is best-possible in the sense that it can be attained by suitable choice of P in (, provided has a boundary of zero measure. We conjecture that this proviso is unnecessary. Some further statements concerning the uniformity of P and the best-possible character of (1) appear in Lemma 4 below. The inequality (1) was previously proved by Verblunsky (24) in the particular case k = 2 under the added assumption was an open set with a boundary of zero measure; but Verblunsky did not investigate the conditions under which (1) was best-possible. Note that, in (1), v(s) exists even when S is not a Lebesgue set. Whilst (1) is best-possible in the sense aforementioned, our main results (2) and (3) below show that much more can be said if we make the additional assumption that S is a Lebesgue set of strictly positive measure. In this case there exists an absolute constant ft k (independent of P and such that lim n-*-«* l{ P») = fi k & [>((S)] 1/fc (2) 7l-»-0O for almost all P in (. The existence of this limit is part of the assertion (2). The phrase 'almost all' can be explained in either of two equivalent senses. In set-theoretic language we may represent the sequence P as a point P x x P 2 x... in the infinite product space Ex (Sx..., on which we set up the product measure [#/?>( )] x [w/w(s)] x... in the usual way (9). Then ' almost all P' means that (2) fails only for a set of P of zero product measure. Alternatively, in the language of probability theory, we may regard P v P 2,... as a sample of random points, each independently and uniformly distributed over (. Then l(p n ) is a random variable; and the phrase ' almost all P' means that (2) holds with probability one. More generally, if P lt P 2,... are independently distributed over (5 with a common probability density function p, the density being taken with respect to Lebesgue measure, then with probability one lim»-<*-«* l(p n ) = P k ki f p^-dlk dv. (3) n-»-oo J< Equation (3) reduces to (2) when p = [u(s)]" 1. Holder's inequality shows that the right-hand side of (3) does not exceed that of (2). Hence non-uniformity in the distribution of P tends to decrease l(p"). The extreme case of this arises when P t, P 2,... are independently distributed over a Lebesgue set ( each with same same arbitrary probability law. An arbitrary probability law can be expressed as the sum of a discrete, a singular, and a continuous component; and the continuous component can be represented almost everywhere by a density function, whose integral over (5 will be less than unity when a discrete or a singular component exists. We shall show that (3) remains true provided p is taken to be this density function. Thus singular or discrete components of a probability law contribute nothing to the limit on the left-hand side of (3): they are, as it were, the extreme cases of non-uniformity in distribution. It is natural to ask if (3) remains valid for probability distributions which are not confined to a bounded set (5, that is to say, can we replace (5 by 91 in (3)? We have given some thought to this question; but have not been able to resolve it. It is quite easy to show that if I p*-i)/* dv is infinite, then so is the limit on the left-hand side of (3). Jsrc

4 302 JILLIAN BEAEDWOOD, J. H. HALTOK AND J. M. HAMMBRSLEY When p(k-i)ik d v j s finite, it appears that a necessary condition for the validity of the Jm. extended version of (3) is that all the absolute kj(k l)th moments of the probability distribution should exist; and we conjecture that this is also a sufficient condition. Unfortunately, we do not possess explicit formulae for the constants a k and fi k, though we have established the following bounds: * (4) where y k is defined by (5). As k -* oo, y k -> y m = (2ne)-i. For the special case k = 2, there is a stronger result Q-I/4 ^ *- n\h IR\ and for k = 3, the stronger result (I) 4 < «8- ( 7 ) The bounds in (6) are due to Verblunsky (24). The lower bounds in (6) and (7) arise from taking P v P 2,..., P n as the centres of equal circles or equal spheres close-packed We should not be surprised if a 2 and a 3 equalled these lower bounds. Numerically, f y 2 = sg /3 2 < , sj a 2 < ; y 3 = < fi 3 s , < a 3 ^ ; y 4 = < /? 4 ^ , ^4 < a 4 < ; (8) y m = < < , /?«, ^ a ro ^ 1. We have not proved that <x k and /3 k tend to limits when k -> oo; so that the symbols a m and /? in (8) must be interpreted as lim inf a k, lim sup a k, etc., as appropriate. The k->co fc-*oo upper bound for /? 2 in (8) is obtained by a special argument and is stronger than in (5). [For comparative purposes 6~* 12i = ] All other results in (8) come from (4), (5), (6) and (7). We have also obtained a very rough Monte Carlo estimate of /? 2 by a pair of simple sampling experiments. In the first experiment we used random number tables to distribute 202 points uniformly over the interior of a circle. We then drew with pencil and ruler what appeared (partly by eye and partly by measurement and trial and error) to be the tour of these points. We measured the tour-length and estimated /? 2 from (2). The second experiment was similar, except that we distributed 400 points uniformly over the interior of a square. As a precaution against subjective errors in choosing the tour, the two experiments were done independently by different people. Any failure t Since this paper was submitted we have seen a paper by L. Few, 'The shortest path and the shortest road through n points' Mathernatika, 2 (1955) Few proves there that <x 2 ^ 1, and that cc k < &*/{2(&-!)}<*-«/** for k > 3. The latter inequality gives <z 3 < , a 4 =s= ,..., «< Few also gives the result that <x k > {(kk)v) llk l(nk)l; but this gives the following lower bounds a 2 > , a 3 > , a 4 Js ,...,«,» , and all these (except for the limiting case as k -* oo) are weaker then our results. Our result that < a 2 was given previously by L. Fejes Toth, Math. Ze.it. 46 (Z940) 83-5.

5 The shortest path through many points 303 to pick the actual tour will lead to an overestimate of /? 2. Experience of carrying through this procedure leads us to believe that it is not nearly so untrustworthy and imprecise as it may seem at first sight. The first and second experiments respectively gave estimates /? 2 = and /? 2 = This agreement is gratifying, though possibly coincidental. In the absence of further evidence, we think it probablej" that A =1= ( 9 ) To see how (2), (3), and (9) fared in practice we compared them with some exact results for the tour of Washington, D.C., and forty-eight other towns, one in each State of the U.S.A. (4). The tour-length given in (4) is 12,345 miles. From (2) and (9) we estimate, I = 0-53(2wF)i, (10) where n = 49 and V is the area of the U.S.A. [Although we only prove (2) for Euclidean space, it could equally well be proved for the surface of a spheroid.] Since (10) gives 9100 miles, the agreement seems indifferent. However, in (4), the distances between towns are road distances. Accordingly, we measured the corresponding straight-line distances, using dividers and conical orthomorphic projections of the U.S.A. ((22), Maps 88/89, 90/91, 92/93) on scales of 78-9 and miles to the inch. On the likely hypothesis that the straight-segment tour will visit the forty-nine towns in the same order as the road-mileage tour J, we found a straight-segment tour-length of 10,070 miles (subject to rather less than 1% error for errors of measurement with the dividers). What is responsible for the disagreement between 9100 and 10,070 miles? Presumably the fact that the different States are of different sizes is not to blame; for any allowance for non-uniformity of distribution will decrease the estimated value of I. For instance, if we use a probability density function which is constant over each State and allocates a total probability ^ to each State (regarding the District of Columbia as a State), we find from (3) 49 ^* (11) where V i is the area of the ith State. Equation (11) gives I = 8400 miles. A more likely cause of the discrepancy is that, although (3) allows for non-uniformity of distribution, it pays no attention to where the areas of high population density are within (5. If n is sufficiently large this is j ustified; but the consideration may become important when we impose the condition that there shall only be one point in each area of high density. In the case of the U.S.A. the areas of high population density and the small States are near the seaboard or the Great Lakes; and the forty-nine towns, chosen by the authors of (4) because they were sufficiently large centres of traffic to merit appearance in a road-map table of mileages between towns, lie noticeably near theouter boundary of the U.S.A. No fewer than eleven of the forty-nine towns are actually on the coast or lakeside, or t Of course, the Monte Carlo experiment is very slight and gives very little information. With only two experiments, the 95 % confidence limits for /? 2 are and We hope someone will be encouraged to make a more precise estimate. % There is another way of looking at the matter not involving this hypothesis: namely, to the estimate 9100 miles we add 23 % to allow for the empirically determined excess of road over straightline distance, and then compare the resulting figure of 11,200 miles with the correct 12,345 miles.

6 304 JILLIAN BEARD WOOD, J. H. HALTON AND J. M. HAMMERSLEY wide estuaries thereof; and a further 5 he within 10 miles of the coast or Lakes (cf. the approximate diameter of the U.S.A., about 3000 miles). This congregation on the outer boundaries will tend to innate the tour-length above the value estimated by (2) or (3). The example serves as a useful warning of the limitations of our asymptotic formulae. We have proved one result which holds for finite values of n: namely, when ( is a Lebesgue set of positive measure and P lt P 2,... are independently and uniformly distributed over (, then for all n ^ 3 This result is stronger than a previous inequality due to Marks (19) in the case k = 2. (There is a misprint in Marks' paper, which erroneously suggests that S"l(P n ) > [^nw(( )]i; and this misprint is copied by Ghosh(8).) Ghosh also proves for k = 2 limsup«?z(p") ^ [2nv{<\$)]l, (13) which is weaker than our result (8). Mahalanobis (18) states without proof that Sl{ P m ) = rth n~b when #(( ) = 1 and k = 2; but his assertion is false in view of (8). The analysis in this paper specifically concentrates on the tour-length l{ P' 1 ). But our arguments apply, with occasional minor modifications, to l*( P n ), the shortest length of wire needed to connect together terminals situated at P lt P 2,..., P n. Consequently, the same results apply to Z* as to I, although the numerical values of the relevant constants a%, /? may differ from those of oc h,fi k.there are two versions of the terminal problem; and an example will serve to distinguish them. Suppose we have four terminals P x, P 2, P 3, -P 4 at the vertices ( + \, ± ) of a unit square in the Euclidean plane. It is quite simple to show that Z*(P 4 ) = 1+^/3. For this an appropriate set of straight wires connects the points (+ \, ± \) to the point {\ J^/3,0), the point {\ \4^, 0) to the point ( %+b«j3,0), and the point ( % + i*j3,0) to the points ( \, ± \). This version of the problem is known as Steiner's street network problem ((2), Chapter VII). In the other version of the problem, considered in (l), (16), (17) one is not allowed to join wires together at points which are not terminals; and the resulting shortest length of wire will then be Z**(P 4 ) = 3. In general, in h dimensions one has Z(P M ) ss l*(p n ) s? l**(p n ) s\$ l(p n ). (14) To see this, one may regard each segment of wire in the l*(p n ) arrangement as a closed path (going once in each direction along it) and remark that the sum of a number of closed paths with points in common is a closed path, so that 2l*(P n ) ^ l(p n ). The argument used for l( P n ) in Lemma 3 breaks down for l*( P n ); but one may use (12) and (14) instead. Results similar to (1), (2) and (3) hold for l**(p n ) with appropriate a**, fl%*. Some slight simplifications in our argument would result if we used the easily verified fact that l( P n ), and for that matter l*( P n ), are non-decreasing functions of n for every given P. But we eschew these simplifications because l**( P n ) may not have this property: for instance, if we take P 5 = ( ^3,0), P 6 = ( k + h-j^, 0) in the above example, we find 1 + ^3 = Z**(P 6 ) < Z**(P 4 ) = 3. The material of this paper raises the following problem, in which we write v k for i-dimensional Lebesgue measure: Given a region in 9t with known measure v = v k (Gi),

7 The shortest path through many points 305 choose in ( a random k'-dimensional subset 6' with prescribedfinitemeasure v' = v k -(&), What is the distribution of the measure v" = tv+i( ") of (k' + l)-dimensional (not necessarily subsets such that v" is minimal subject to S" being bounded^ by ( '? The present paper considers the special case k' = 0, with the usual convention that the zero-dimensional Lebesgue measure of a point set is the number of points it contains (v' = n, v" = I). The case k' = 1, k = 3 would be a randomized version of Plateau's problem ((2), Chapter VII); while, for other values of k', k, we get randomized versions of Douglas' problem ((3), (5)). The main difficulty presented by this generalized problem lies, we believe, in the precise definition of the random nature of ( ' and in the restrictions to be imposed on the connectivity, orientability, and other topological characteristics of the spanning We do not consider the generalized problem in this paper; but we feel intuitively that the basic appeal to subadditivity, which is the key of our present analysis, would still remain appropriate in the general case. That is to say, roughly, that if we take v' proportional to v and regard v" as a function of (5, then v" is a subadditive set-function of (. The proof of Lemma 5 below should afford a clearer idea of what we mean by this very condensed, and consequently rather cryptic, remark and of how it leads to a solution of the problem. We shall now specify the detailed notation to be used in the proof of our results. After that, we shall give a short outline of the method of proof, together with a few conjectures on results we have not succeeded in proving. The lemmas assembled in the Appendix contain the relevant details of rigorous proof and exact statement; and hence in the short outline we are free to ignore these precise details and to concentrate instead on the broad spirit of the underlying ideas. We have already stated that German capitals denote bounded point sets in 5R, that (5 denotes the closure and that boldface capitals denote sequences of points. These symbols may carry suffices to denote different sets or sequences: e.g. P } = P xi, P 2j>... and Pf = P ip Py,..., P nj. We write (^ + ( 2 for the union of % and ( 2 ; for the union of several sets ( ^; (S^G^ for the intersection x and ( 2 ; (Sj-C*^ for the (possibly empty) largest subset x not in G 2. Sequences of points can be manipulated in the same way: e.g. P m (5 denotes the subset of P v P 2,..., P n which lies in ; whereas (P( ) n denotes the first n points of that subset of P which lies N( denotes the (possibly infinite) number of points in the sequence and and denote the tour and the tour-length of If P(S is empty, T( PS) is taken to be the empty set of 9ft and l( P(5) = 0. To illustrate a fairly complicated use of this symbolism, which occurs in Lemma 2, denotes the supremum of all tour-lengths through not more than v points of the boundary of the set (Bp where v is twice the number of points which are both in (5 3 - and amongst the first n points of the sequence P. To avoid tiresome repetition of the phrase ' if ( is a Lebesgue set', we adopt the convention that the mere writing of v(( ) to denote the ^-dimensional Lebesgue measure of ( carries with it the automatic postulate that G is in fact a Lebesgue set. Notice, however, that the writing of v(( ) merely confirms f We have only a very vague idea of what we mean here by ' bounded', and part of the problem is to give a suitable definition to this word.

8 306 JnxLiAN BEARD WOOD, J. H. HALTON AND J. M. HAMMERSLBY that a closed set is a Lebesgue set and does not necessarily imply that ( itself is a Lebesgue set. We write #(( ) for the diameter of ( : this is necessarily finite because (5 is bounded. O will denote the empty set of JR. ( will always denote a semi-closed unit hypercube of k dimensions, i.e. a hypercube of unit length side, open on its lower-left faces and closed on its upper-right faces. 1; ( 2,... will denote semiclosed unit hypercubes in different positions in 9t. If is a positive real number, we write (\$; for the set of all points with coordinates (ga^, x a,...,,x k ) such that (x 1,x 2,...,x k ) is a point of (. Thus (5 is a -fold linear magnification without rotation, which leaves the origin of 9t invariant; and = and u( (S) = E, k v(q,). The symbol E, conventionally operates on all subsequent sets in a product: thus P is the magnification of P(S whereas the intersection of the unmagnified P with the magnified (. However, brackets will override this convention: for instance, in Lemma 5, we have (?? ) to denote the intersection of the ty-fold magnification of & with the -fold magnification and this contrasts with )/( (\$;, which would be the i/-fold magnification of the intersection of ( with -fold magnification The phrase ' P p((&)' carries the following meaning: (5 is a Lebesgue set of strictly positive measure and P = P V P 2,... is a sample of random points independently distributed over Gc with a common Lebesgue-measurable probability density function p, where pdv = 1. In the special case when this distribution is uniform, i.e. whenp = we write P e it(( ) in place of P e p(( ). The phrase '.P e Wg means that P = P l3 P 2,... is a sample from a Poisson process of density, over Sft; that is to say, for arbitrary disjoint Lebesgue sets prob {N{ *<&,) = N t ; j = 1,2,..., m} = U^ff^ exp { -»«,)}. (15) In most of the proof k is fixed and it is convenient to suppress the dependence of constants and functions upon k. In particular we adopt the abbreviations and notation ; q = (k- 1)/&; log 2 a; = (logx) z.j < 16) With these notational conventions in mind, the reader will be able to get precise statements of our full results by reading the enunciations of the various lemmas. Suppose that we break a given set into a number of disjoint = 1,2,...,m). Then Lemmas 1 and 2 taken together state that, for any given P n = P 1; P 2,..., P n, the tour-length through all points of P" (namely l( P is roughly equal to the sum of m the corresponding tour-lengths in the parts of S (namely 2 Z(P provided n is large. The explanation of this rough statement is that, whereas each of these two quantities is of magnitude n^k- 1)lk in view of the ultimate results (2) and (3), their difference is bounded on one side by a fixed quantity, depending on the diameter of (, and on the other side by the sum of tour-lengths through points on the boundaries of the ( ^. If, as we shall eventually arrange, these boundaries are sufficiently well-behaved to be sets of dimensionality k 1, the tour-lengths through such boundary points will be of magnitude TJ(*-2)/(*-I) J which is small in comparison with n < - k ~ r>lk. We therefore seek

9 The shortest path through many points 307 the convolution of the distributions of the several l( However, it is not easy to handle this convolution when the respective Z(P ( ^) are not independent of one another; and clearly they are dependent when n is fixed, inasmuch as an excess of points of P 71 x, say, will tend to reduce the number in ( 2, so that one may expect l( P 71^) and l( P n ( 2 ) to be negatively correlated. To overcome this difficulty we make n a random variable. Specifically, instead of sampling or &(( ), we sample P from W^ for large. Then, by (15), the random point sets 3 -, and therefore the random tour-lengths Z(P m (\$^), are statistically independent for j = 1,2,...,m. This Poisson process has the useful property that n = N( PGr) is a Poisson variable with parameter v(s), and the conditional distribution of given n is identical with the unconditional distribution of P 71 under the assumption that P u((&). When is large, n will be nearly equal to v(<&) with high probability; so that the distribution of Z(Pg) forpejtj should be identifiable with the distribution of J(P x g) for P e u{<&), where x is the integer part of This identification can be made rigorous by a Tauberian argument, in which the Tauberian condition is that l(p n ( ), regarded as a function of n, cannot increase or decrease too rapidly. The foregoing remarks exhibit the essence of our line of attack; but it is convenient to make a further modification to deal with the fact that the limit in (2) is independent of the shape of Gs. To this end we transform the problem so that behaves rather like Lebesgue measure: in brief, we have to remove the power I/A in (2) before we can hope to get additivity in (. Now the distribution of P( when P Wg is, apart from a simple change of scale, the same as the distribution of when PeTTj. Moreover, when PePf 1,«= I(P ( ) will be roughly equal tofl( Gc); and hence the expression n (k ~ 1)lk v llk (E,(&) will behave approximately like, k v(qi), which is additive as required. This motivates the consideration of l( P (g) for P e W 1 in Lemmas 5 and 6. As already stated, l( P Gs) is nearly equal to the sum of the independent random quantities Z(P G%), where the G^ are disjoint parts composing (S. One might therefore expect l( P G?) to be asymptotically normal in view of the central limit theorem. But we have not succeeded in proving this, although we do show that, for real positive t, the cumulant generating function of l( P Gs) satisfies #,(P g) = log(i?exp<z(p ( )~w;(<) M(S) as ->oo, (17) where w(t) is a function of A and t only. This in itself does not imply normality, nor even does it provide information about the magnitude of the cumulants of Z(P (S). The following simple counter-example is instructive. Let a; be a random variable which takes the values 0 and with equal probability \. The cumulant generating function of x is K t (x) = log ( + e«) ~ ti as -> oo (t > 0); (18) but the asymptotic behaviour of the cumulants of a; cannot be deduced from the coefficients in t regarded as a power series in t: the mean of x is, not + o( ) and the variance of a; is J 2, not o( ). There is every reason to believe that, when P W v <f(p e) = yff ^(( ) + O( & -W(*-»>) as ^oo, (19) in which case we could deduce results about the magnitude of the error term implicit in (2) and (3). Indeed, by following the type of argument used in Lemma 6, we can

10 308 JDLLIAN BEARDWOOD, J. H. HALTON AND J. M. HAMMERSLEY prove (19) under rather severe restrictions about the nature for instance, (19) holds in the particular case = S. Although we cannot even prove (19) for general (, we believe that the error term in (19) is capable of still further reduction, probably as far as 0( fc-1 ). Similarly, we believe that the order of magnitude in Lemma 6 could be reduced. As one may easily see, when k = 1 the corresponding results depend upon the shape of OK, in particular upon how pathologically disconnected (5 is. The analysis for k > 2 fails for k = 1 because is then not small compared with v( S) when is large. There may, however, be some justification for comparing the results for k = 1 with those for k > 1 in the special =. When k = 1 and P W v we find Z(P (S) ~ &(<&) with probability one as, -* oo, and varz(p g) = 0(1), but Z(P ) is not asymptotically normal. APPENDIX The appendix is wholly concerned with formalities of proof. LEMMA 1. m+1 = S 1( then m \ m ml H P"S(S,-) E(P^) ft+^,)} < S!Z(P re / (S,) a m P B 2,) < XiUP^J + Wi +fy+i)}*s J(P»,) + *IS S % We may suppose P 3 - =(= > and take <2 ; - P TC S 3 -. The central term of (1-1) is at least as large as the length of a closed path of straight segments joining Q t, Q 2,..., Q m, <2 X together with digressions at each Qjaround T(P n Qlj). But this path passes through P 2 <&j and so cannot be shorter than the first term of (1-1). LEMMA 2. // ( m are disjoint, then m \ m ( P ra S % )> S {*( P - 2 sup liqi^zp^xi - (g )}. (2-1) J = l / i=l Qj We may suppose P ^ #= D and m > 1. S,rl P m i;( y) consists of one or more \ i=i 1 connected pieces, some of which may degenerate to points. Discard any such piece which does not contain some point of P n. The closure of any surviving piece will be called aj-piece. The number v of j-pieces satisfies v ^ N(P n <Sj). Let Q/ Qij> Q2P > Qzv, j be the set of end-points of the j-pieces, in which there are two coincident Q's for any surviving degenerate _?-piece. Let Ij denote the total length of all ^'-pieces. Since / m \ m 3-91 (S 3 -, and since li P n 2 3-1S= S ^> (2-1) will follow as soon as we have proved \ y=i / j=i (2-2) We shall establish (2-2) by constructing a closed path consisting only of the j-pieces, each traversed just once, together with a part of a double circuit of T = T(Q 2 j"). Choose a particular (Bj and suppress the suffix j. We may suppose the Q's are labelled so that Q t, Q 2,..., Q Zv, Q x occur in that order when passing around T. We interpret suffices modulo 2v; and write Q r for the point at the other end of the j-piece (denoted by J t )

11 The shortest path through many points 309 terminated by Q t. We construct the closed path in stages. At any particular stage certain of the Q t will have been visited by the path, the remainder unvisited. Suppose that Q a,q b, Q c have been visited, whilst Q a+1, Q a+2,...,q,,^,q b+1,q b+2,...,q e^ have not yet been visited. We say that Q b+1 is an odd neighbour of Q b if c 1 b is odd. Similarly Q b _ 1 is an odd neighbour of Q b if b 1 a is odd. We start the path at Q t and proceed as follows. From Q x pass to Q 2 along T; thence to Q 2. along J 2 ; thence to the (unique) odd neighbour of Q r (say Q x ) along T\ thence to Q x. along J x ; thence to the (unique) odd neighbour of Q x, along T; etc,... Ultimately this procedure of alternate steps along j-pieces and along T to the unique odd neighbour will bring the path back to Qi- The reason why the required odd neighbours are unique is because 2v is even. If, upon return to Q x, the path has traversed all j-pieces, it is the required path. If not, start a fresh similar closed path from any Q-point not yet visited, the first step of the fresh path being along T to the odd neighbour of the starting point of the fresh path; and continue to construct such closed paths, starting from unvisited points, until all j-pieces are traversed. Thereafter we get the required closed path by travelling around T with digressions around each of the already-constructed closed paths whenever such a path is encountered for the first time on T. In following the above argument, it may be helpful to consider some particular case. For instance, when v = 6 and 1' = 6, 2' = 5, 3' = 10, 4' = 7, 8' = 12 and 9' = 11, the ultimately constructed path is LEMMA 3. // P e «(( ) and n ^ 3, then (12) holds. Let x it denote the distance of P i from the ith nearest of P lt P 2,..., P^i, P i+1,, P n Since T( P") does not visit any point twice, the sum of the lengths of the two segments of T( P n ) which terminate at P^ is at least x lf + x^. Hence where S t is the expectation over P jt and S' f is the conditional expectation over P 1,P 2,...,P j _ 1,P j+x,...,p n given P t. Let <B X denote a ^-dimensional hypersphere of radius x centred at Pj and write 7 = J =»( x ( )<t;( J = 7rHfc*/(ifc)!. (3-2) The conditional probability, given P p that x^ exceeds x is the probability that not more than i 1 of the n 1 independently and uniformly random P 1,P 2,..., Pj_ ly P j+1,,p 7I lie in a. Thus t-l A, _ 1\ /V\ r I y\n-l-r prob (^ > x\ Pj ) = S Q (" r *) (f) (l-f) (3-3) Hence #J(x y + x 2j ) = prob (x xj > a; P y ) + prob(a; 2/ > x\pj)dx Jo = r(l-v x IV)»-*{2 + (n-z)v x IV}dx. (3-4) Jo 20 Camb. Philos. 55, 4

12 310 JELLIAN BEARDWOOD, J. H. HALTON AND J. M. HAMMERSLEY It is an elementary matter to verify that (1 z) n ~ 2 {2 + (% 3)z} is a non-increasing non-negative function of z for 0 ^ z ^ 1. Hence we shall not increase the right-hand side of (3-4) if we replace V x by min{«(( ), v(<b x )}. This gives, from w + *w)> [\l-x*lp k r-%2 + {n-z)x k l p K}dx, (3-5) Jo where p k = F(P)!/7r* fc. (3-6) Since the right-hand side of (3-5) is independent of Pp (3-1) provides n ) > in P(l -z) n ~ 2 {2 + (n- 3) z}dx, (3-7) Jo where z = x k \p k. The right-hand side of (3 7) is the sum of two complete beta functions. Expressing these in terms of gamma functions and simplifying, we get the central term of (12). To prove the rest of (12), we write a n = n\n~ Q l(n q)\ [see (16) for the definition of q\ and combine the well-known fact that a n -» 1 as n -> oo with the easily verified fact that a n+l LEMMA 4. There exist an absolute constant a k < 0(k l)-*- 1 '/ 2 * and a set function e) corresponding to every given e > 0, such that for all P. Consequently Z(P ts : an«[v(( ) + e] 1 -<' + a(,e) (a = a k lcl) (4-1) = lim sup n-ol{ P"( ) ^ av 1 -^ ). (4-2) A sequence P is called maximal if equality holds in (4-2). A necessary and sufficient condition for ( to contain a maximal sequence is should contain one. A sufficient condition to contain a maximal sequence is that the boundary should be of zero Jc-dimensional measure. Each maximal sequence (if any) in ( is uniformly dense in the open subsets (if any) // ( is open, then (4-3) for some P in S. First, take ( = ( ; and for any positive integer m, dissect S into m*" 1 disjoint identical cylinders, each of unit heightand having as cross-section a (k 1)-dimensional semi-closed hypercube of side m -1. Each point of P ra E lies not further than %(k 1)4 m~ l from the axis of the cylinder containing it. Consider the closed path starting from one end of an axis nearest to a corner of (J and passing in turn along the axes of each cylinder, digressing at right-angles to and from any point of P ra in the same cylinder as that axis, going from axis to neighbouring axis in an obvious regular fashion on reaching the end of an axis, and finally returning direct to its starting point. The length of this path does not exceed the right-hand side of 1.m- 1 + l.fti (4-4)

13 The shortest path through many points 311 Now take m to be the least integer exceeding (k l)- 1 l zk n 1/k, substitute in (4-4), divide through by n Q k^, and let n -> oo. This gives Jc-lL(P&) < tfik-l)-**- 1 ***. (4-5) Define a k to be the supremum of the left-hand side of (4-5) taken over all P. This establishes (4-1) for (5 = 6 and also proves the right-hand side of (4). In accordance with a standard theorem (see, for example, (25), Theorem 1-6) we may cover S with a finite number, say m = m((, e), of disjoint semi-closed hypercubes whose measures Vj satisfy m _ ZVj^v( ) + ie. (4-6) 3=1 be the intersection of the jth hypercube with (, and let n } = N( P Then Making due allowance for a simple change of scale of linear magnitude FJ" 9, we see that the definition of a ensures the existence of a number a*(vp e) such that l( < a»j(tj + iem- 1 ) 1 -* + a*(v p e), (4-8) because l( P ( ^) is the tour-length through n^ points contained in a semi-closed hypercube of measure Vj and we have proved (4-1) = (J. Define m { i-i Then Lemma 1, (4-8), Holder's inequality, (4-6), (4-7) and (4-9) yield m 0 3 } j=\ 3=1 I m \q I m U-a a I S %) ( iem- 1 )J + o(, e) m (e,e), (4-10) which establishes (4-1) and hence (4-2). Before proceeding to the remainder of Lemma 4, we make two remarks. First, a > 0; this follows from Lemma 3. Secondly, if we define A(< ) = supz(p(s), (4-11) p then ( contains a sequence P such that this supremum is attained; that is to say For, by (4-11), we can find P^ such that = A(( ). (4-12) A(g) *S n-ihpjty+j- 1 (n = n ip n 2j,...), (4-13) where n ip n^,... is an increasing sequence of integers for each j = 1,2,...; whereupon we may take for the desired sequence P the sequence MlH-'i21' ' " A H * l2>-*22> ' -'JB2> ".13» -*23' > where ^4,,... is a sufficiently rapidly increasing sequence of the form n xv n T2,...

14 312 JILLIAN BEARDWOOD, J. H. HALTON AND J. M. HAMMERSLEY We now prove (4-3). Since changes of scale are trivially allowed for, we may suppose that the given open satisfies ( (. By the definition of a, (4-12) ensures the existence of P such that 2(P ) a. (4-14) Then, since L(P(f) ^ i(ps), (4-14) and (4-2) yield = a. (4-15) For brevity, write V = v((&). is open, ( is a closed set of measure 1 V. Write n 1 = iv(p»( ), n, = tf[p»(g-g)],? 1 = Z(P"( ), and Z 2 = i(p»( -( )]. By Lemma 1 and (4-1) applied to l 2, Then (4-15) and (4-16) yield (4-16) a < limsup(?i. l /?i) 9 jl(pg) + a(l- F + e)*-«lim sup (rc 2 /n.) 9. (4-17) Suppose, in order to obtain a contradiction, that lim sup (njn)* = 0. (4-18) By (4-2), (P( ) < av 1 -^ ) < a. Alsow 2 /w < 1. Hence (4-17) and (4-18) give a «S a,(l-v + e) 1 -^; (4-19) and because a > 0 and e is arbitrary, (4-19) is a contradiction unless V = 0, in which case (4-3) is trivial. Hence we suppose (4*18) is false. By Holder's inequality From (4-17) and (4-20), lim sup (njn)* L( P(g) > a{l - (1 - F + e) 1 -* lim sup (» 2 /w) 9 } 1. (4-20) >a(f-e) 1-9 limsup(» 1 /») 9. (4-21) Thereupon (4-3) follows from (4-21), the falsity of (4-18), and the arbitrariness of e. By (4-2), since S = 6, any maximal sequence in ( is a maximal sequence Conversely, suppose (5 contains a maximal sequence P. Then we can find a 0 in such that the distance between P 3 - and Q } does not exceed 2~K Next we can find a closed path n through F x,p %,...,P n of length not exceeding Z(Q ) ~* ^y touring around Q\, Q<L,--,Q n an( i making digressions at each Q } to and from P r Thus l(q n ) + 2 > l( P m ); and this implies that O is a maximal sequence in S\ has a boundary of measure zero and *;(( ) > 0, we can find an open set of measurefl(gs), namely, the complement of the closure of the complement of. By (4-3) this open set contains a maximal sequence. This sequence is a fortiori a maximal sequence

15 The shortest path through many points 313 Finally, suppose that ( contains a maximal sequence P; and suppose that ( contains an open interval Q; of (necessarily positive) measure V. Let Since Q also has measure V, Lemma 1 and (4-2) give lim sup {a^/ ) 9 F 1 "* + a(?i 2 /n)«[d((1) - F] 1 -*}. (4-22) n-»-oo By Holder's inequality, the reverse inequality (and therefore equality) holds in (4-22). But equality holds in Holder's inequality only if the relevant terms are proportional. ThuS limsup» 1 /n= F/»((g). (4-23) n->-oo Since (4-23) holds for every open interval y P is uniformly dense in the open subsets LEMMA 5. There exists an absolute constant f! k such that for every Lebesgue set (5 <?Z(P g)~/? fc &M ( ) = /? %(< ) as g^oo (5-1) when P ew ±. Moreover for t ^ 0, the cumulant-generating function K*m) = log<?{exp[fl(pgg)]} ~ w(0g fc v(e) as g^ oo, (5-2) where w(t) is a function of k and t only, such that w(t) = o(t k ) as t -> oo. In the proof of Lemma 5 we assume without further mention that all sets are Lebesgue sets. It is convenient to prove (5-1) and (5-2) simultaneously by denning #?*( < ) = *M(P G), (5-3) and writing K for K* and K** in all statements true for both K* and K**. Since e x is a convex increasing function of x, we have 0 < K**m) < K*m). (5-4) Let \$!, 2,..., m be disjoint sets; and write m+1 = x. The disjointness together with the hypothesis P e W 1 implies that P j, P 2,..., P m are stochastically independent. Hence ^P!), J(P 2 ),...,Z(P m ) are independent. Hence, by Lemma 1, A similar result holds for Kf*; and so we have \j 1 / / 1 If n = N{P ),l(p&) *s n5(g). Hence log S c-^^^s^e" 1^) = i>(<5) (e M < - 1). (5-7) n=0 n -

16 314 JILLIAN BEARDWOOD, J. H. HALTON AND J. M. HAMMBRSLBY By (5-4) and (5-7), 0 s K t {\$) <»( ) (e w <«- 1). (5-8) Define &(< )= lim sup -*if ( ( (S), (5-9) so that xi(a&) = lim sup - k K t (gag) = a fc lim sup 1 a)- k Ki(g<te) = a fc &(( ). (5-10) This definition is valid provided that we work with extended real numbers (i.e. including + oo) as far as (5-14), where we prove that Xt is actually finite. From (5-5) and wnere mllk Choose a such that (5 a(. Cover a & with disjoint )/S 1, i/ 2 > > ^m' the integer part of l+ag/rj; and arrange for t\^i and i/s^+1 to abut facially for j = 1, 2,...,?» 1. From (5-6), we have, with S m+1 = S^ is = lim sup - fc if, S (7 j) (g ) < lim sup g~ fc I From (5-8) m < (lim sup -* S ^[(^ y) + a fc (fc + 3)*^-**. (5-12) m S *i[fo,) ( )] ^ 2 «[(^e,) (g )] {exp («[( 7,) (g )]) - 1} 3=1 j=l,) (g )] = (e'^fc- l)»(g ). (5-13) From (5-12) and (5-13) 0 < Xt( ) < (e'"^ - 1) + «fc (i + 3)* I?*-*«, ' (5-14) which shows that Xt is finite. Now consider the special = a. We have because Z[P(5/ ^) ( ( )] ^ Z(Pi/ j). (This is also true for I** in place of I, because i) (g ) i s a convex set.) Hence (5-12) and (5-15) give Let t] -* 00 in (5-16), and apply (5-9) and (5-10), with the result (5-16) Xi(aE). (5-17) This implies the existence of h'mg- fc^(gae) = a*x(( ) = a k w(t), say. (5-18) Of course, w(t) is one function when K = if* and is another function when K = K**.

17 The shortest path through many points 315 Next let ( be once more an arbitrary Lebesgue set. Prescribe e such that 0 < e < 1. Because (Sis a Lebesgue set we can find disjoint a 1^. 1,a 2 (E i,...a^s^such that By (5-11), (5-18), (5-14) and (5-19) a&a < e. (5-19) \ i=i / [>(( ) + e] + e* + (2aifc4«) fc ( - log ef- k, (5-20) upon choosing y = ^~^i~ 1 loge. Let e ^- 0 in (5-20), with the result By (5-6) K^ad) < X,( ) + Z,[(o ) - ( ] + 2te^fc.. (5-22) Hence, from (5-22), (5-18) and (5-21), liminf -*Z,(g ) > lim,-"z,(oge) - urn sup -*,[ {(«) - }] f-»-oo -»-oo J-»-a3 Thus, by (5-9), (5-21), and (5-23) 5= am0-^(0<(as)- ] = w(t)v(<&). (5-23) lim -*,( ( ) = w{t) «(g). (5-24) To prove w>( ) = o(< fc ) as t -+ oo, put ( = S in (5-14) and choose rj = Ar^-Mogf. The required result (5-2) follows from (5-24) with K* in place of K. Similarly (5-1) follows from (5-24) with K** in place of K and t = 1. LEMMA 6. // P W t and ( is a Lebesgue set G, then uniformly -0( 2*-2/(*-l)) (i > lo(»log«) (* = 2)J By Lemma 4, there exists an absolute constant c fc such that for any sequence P whatsoever; and hence oo (6-1) Z(P W (S) ^ c fc n«= c lc n< k - r >" c, (6-2) f (6-3) (The conclusion l**(p n &) ^ cf*n^ follows from (6-3) and (14).) The inequality (6-3) also holds trivially when k = 1 if we take c x = 1. Now let P e T^. By (6-3), n=o n\ n=0

18 316 JELLIAN BEARDWOOD, J. H. HALTON AND J. M. HAMMERSLEY Hence we may define the finite function w{ ) = sup [varz(p e)]i (6-5) Cover ( with 2 k equal disjoint hypercubes & 1; ( 2,..., G 2 *; and write 7 = 1 / 7=1 We have var L ± = var cov (L 2, Z x L 2 ) + var (Z^ L 2 ) (6-6) *k {[vari, 2 ]*+ [var {L^L^f ^ {[varl 2 ]* + \S{L X -L 2 ) 2 ]*} 2. (6-7) The lengths l( ( 3 ) are stochastically independent because P e W v Thus varl 2 = I varz(p ( S,) = ^ S [^(M)] 2 = 2 fc [^(^)] 2, (6-8) 4=1 4=1 i=i because 2(( ^( 3 ) is a subset of some semi-closed unit hypercube. By Lemma 1 we have 2* fc i (6-9) To get an inequality in the opposite direction to (6-9), we write n = N(P (g) and consider the situation conditional upon n beingfixed.we may then number the points of P so that the first n of them are the ones in (. In this case Applying Lemma 2 to (6-10), we have p^ro^)(-*,)] ^ -2*+!supZ[Q 2m (ife)(jr- 4=1 Qi Q (6-11) Now l[q 2n (U&) (0t is the length of a path through 2ra points on the boundary of ( ; and is therefore, by Lemma 1, at most equal to 2k[l' + #( ( )], where V is the maximum length of a path through 2m points on one of the 2k faces of. Since each face is a (k 1)-dimensional hypercube of side \i, we have V < c k _- L \E,(2n) < - k - 2)Kk - v> by (6-3). Thus L x -Li> -2 fc + 1.2fc[c ft _ 1^(2w)< & - 2 W*-«+ p4g]. (6-12) By (6-9) and (6-12) (L x -L 2 f < 2 2fc + 2 P P[i-*c fc _ 1 (2n)<*- 2 '«fc -» + I] 2. (6-13) Now if/? and e are positive constants, we have a standard result ((10), Theorem 137 (6)) n=0 as 1/ -> oo. Hence (6-13) and (6-14) give 2 e-'^w" = [(1 + e) yy + 0{e-i^") (6-14) n t - L 2 ) 2 ^ S e-"«l VS, 2 2fc + 2 i 3 g 2 [)fc-ic fc _ 1 (2»)< fc - 2 )«fc - 1 > + I] 2»=o m '

19 The shortest path through many points 317 where A and B are absolute constants (depending only on k) since we may by & after summation without decreasing the sum. From (6-7), (6-8) and (6-15), we get In (6-16) the right-hand side is independent and hence taking the supremum of the left-hand side for all ( <=, 6, we get Now define x(g) = w{h)\ k l -^- v >. (6-18) Then (6-17) and (6-18) give >1). (6-19) If k > 2, (6-19) gives *( ) < *( ) + C; (6-20) and hence a(2* ) < C + \x{2 n -T-g) < C(l+ ) + ia;(2"- 2 g) <... ^ 2C + 2- n x(,). (6-21) Thus *(9/) ^ 2C + ([log 2 i/])- 1 sup a;( ) f (6-22) 1S «2 where [z] is the integer part of z and 7} = 2 n. Thus, in the case k > 2, (6-1) follows from (6-18), (6-4) and (6-22). When k = 2, (6-19) gives *( ) < z( ) + C, (6-23) in which we make the substitution y(g)=*(s)aog, (6-24) with the result [*/( ) -*/( )]log \i > y{i)log2-c. (6-25) We shall show that (6-1) follows from (6-25), inasmuch as the assumption that y( ) is unbounded leads to a contradiction in the following way. If y{,) is unbounded there exists 0 > 2 such that, p * */( )> max r^-, sup y(i). (6-26) Substitution of (6-26) into the right-hand side of (6-25) gives ^ (6-27) since log 0 > 0. If 0 > 2, we may repeat the process with = f 0 in (6-25); and so on until we get y(2_^^ ^ ^ 3 ^ ^ ^ ^ y(^ > sup y(g)> (6. 28) 2<J<4 where is the integer part of Iog 2 0. However (6-28) is a contradiction because 2 <2-" 0 < 4. LEMMA 7. // P e «(( ), (2) /wms with probability one. Since we may make a simple change of scale, there is no essential loss of generality in assuming (5 c (. Let P o e W x and P x e W g k. Since the distribution of Z(P o g(s) is the same as the distribution of l( P t ( ), Lemmas 5 and 6 give as g->c» (7-1)

20 318 JILLIAN BBABDWOOD, J. H. HALTON AND J. M. HAMMERSLEY and varz(p 1 (g) =^- 2 var?(p o ge) = C>(^2(fc - 1) - {2/(& - 1))+2e ) as ->oo, (7-2) for any prescribed e > 0. Hence for all sufficiently large and therefore, by Chebyshev's inequality, provided is sufficiently large and 0 < e < l/k(k 1). Next, writing k v(qi) = rj, we have robtl^g)-^^ )! < e fc -M )] Ss l-^g- 2 " 5, (7-4) prob[(l-e)j; < iv(pjg) <(l+e)5/] = (l = 1 - O(e-i^) ^ l - Jg-W* (7-5) for large enough. Since the pair of relations it follows from (7-4) and (7-5) that the probability of (7-7) is at least \-g~ m enough. Next define/(n) by for large in which Pe u((&). Since the conditional distribution of l( P x ( ) given that N( P x ( ) = n is the unconditional distribution of l(p n ), we have Since 0^1 -/(w) < 1, (7-9) gives e-'^[l -/(n)] = prob[(7-7) holds] > / fc. (7-9) n=0 where ^4 is a constant (depending upon e and (S) and and i/ are sufficiently large. Now let J m denote the set of integers n satisfying f=j) <w< (l3-i) (~-l,v-->. (7-11) Then (7-10) gives, for large enough m, sup [1-/(»)]> 1-4 (^t-. (7-12)

### 1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1

Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or

### CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,

### Partitioning edge-coloured complete graphs into monochromatic cycles and paths

arxiv:1205.5492v1 [math.co] 24 May 2012 Partitioning edge-coloured complete graphs into monochromatic cycles and paths Alexey Pokrovskiy Departement of Mathematics, London School of Economics and Political

### An example of a computable

An example of a computable absolutely normal number Verónica Becher Santiago Figueira Abstract The first example of an absolutely normal number was given by Sierpinski in 96, twenty years before the concept

### Course 221: Analysis Academic year , First Semester

Course 221: Analysis Academic year 2007-08, First Semester David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1989 2007 Contents 1 Basic Theorems of Real Analysis 1 1.1 The Least Upper Bound Principle................

### Labeling outerplanar graphs with maximum degree three

Labeling outerplanar graphs with maximum degree three Xiangwen Li 1 and Sanming Zhou 2 1 Department of Mathematics Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics

### Stationary random graphs on Z with prescribed iid degrees and finite mean connections

Stationary random graphs on Z with prescribed iid degrees and finite mean connections Maria Deijfen Johan Jonasson February 2006 Abstract Let F be a probability distribution with support on the non-negative

### 1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set.

1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set. Basic Topology Written by Men-Gen Tsai email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw Proof: For any element x of the empty set, x is also an element of every set since

### Graphs without proper subgraphs of minimum degree 3 and short cycles

Graphs without proper subgraphs of minimum degree 3 and short cycles Lothar Narins, Alexey Pokrovskiy, Tibor Szabó Department of Mathematics, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany. August 22, 2014 Abstract

### ABSTRACT. For example, circle orders are the containment orders of circles (actually disks) in the plane (see [8,9]).

Degrees of Freedom Versus Dimension for Containment Orders Noga Alon 1 Department of Mathematics Tel Aviv University Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel Edward R. Scheinerman 2 Department of Mathematical Sciences

### arxiv:1112.0829v1 [math.pr] 5 Dec 2011

How Not to Win a Million Dollars: A Counterexample to a Conjecture of L. Breiman Thomas P. Hayes arxiv:1112.0829v1 [math.pr] 5 Dec 2011 Abstract Consider a gambling game in which we are allowed to repeatedly

### Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm

Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction

### Gambling Systems and Multiplication-Invariant Measures

Gambling Systems and Multiplication-Invariant Measures by Jeffrey S. Rosenthal* and Peter O. Schwartz** (May 28, 997.. Introduction. This short paper describes a surprising connection between two previously

### REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 2

REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN The questions are from Stein and Shakarchi s text, Chapter 1. 1. Prove that the Cantor set C constructed in the text is totally disconnected and perfect. In other

### THREE DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY

Chapter 8 THREE DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY 8.1 Introduction In this chapter we present a vector algebra approach to three dimensional geometry. The aim is to present standard properties of lines and planes,

### 1 Limiting distribution for a Markov chain

Copyright c 2009 by Karl Sigman Limiting distribution for a Markov chain In these Lecture Notes, we shall study the limiting behavior of Markov chains as time n In particular, under suitable easy-to-check

### WHAT ARE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT?

WHAT ARE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT? introduction Many students seem to have trouble with the notion of a mathematical proof. People that come to a course like Math 216, who certainly

### Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces

Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1988 2008 Contents 1 Topological Spaces 1 1.1 Continuity and Topological Spaces...............

### x if x 0, x if x < 0.

Chapter 3 Sequences In this chapter, we discuss sequences. We say what it means for a sequence to converge, and define the limit of a convergent sequence. We begin with some preliminary results about the

### MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.

MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms. This text is based on the following books: Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology by Nicolas Bourbaki Counterexamples

### 5. Convergence of sequences of random variables

5. Convergence of sequences of random variables Throughout this chapter we assume that {X, X 2,...} is a sequence of r.v. and X is a r.v., and all of them are defined on the same probability space (Ω,

### SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576

SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576 SOLUTIONS BY OLIVIER MARTIN 13 #5. Let T be the topology generated by A on X. We want to show T = J B J where B is the set of all topologies J on X with A J. This amounts

### max cx s.t. Ax c where the matrix A, cost vector c and right hand side b are given and x is a vector of variables. For this example we have x

Linear Programming Linear programming refers to problems stated as maximization or minimization of a linear function subject to constraints that are linear equalities and inequalities. Although the study

### AN ALGORITHM FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A GIVEN BINARY MATROID IS GRAPHIC

AN ALGORITHM FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A GIVEN BINARY MATROID IS GRAPHIC W. T. TUTTE. Introduction. In a recent series of papers [l-4] on graphs and matroids I used definitions equivalent to the following.

### MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 5 9/17/2008 RANDOM VARIABLES

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 5 9/17/2008 RANDOM VARIABLES Contents 1. Random variables and measurable functions 2. Cumulative distribution functions 3. Discrete

### OPTIMAL SELECTION BASED ON RELATIVE RANK* (the "Secretary Problem")

OPTIMAL SELECTION BASED ON RELATIVE RANK* (the "Secretary Problem") BY Y. S. CHOW, S. MORIGUTI, H. ROBBINS AND S. M. SAMUELS ABSTRACT n rankable persons appear sequentially in random order. At the ith

### ON INDUCED SUBGRAPHS WITH ALL DEGREES ODD. 1. Introduction

ON INDUCED SUBGRAPHS WITH ALL DEGREES ODD A.D. SCOTT Abstract. Gallai proved that the vertex set of any graph can be partitioned into two sets, each inducing a subgraph with all degrees even. We prove

### Chapter 15 Introduction to Linear Programming

Chapter 15 Introduction to Linear Programming An Introduction to Optimization Spring, 2014 Wei-Ta Chu 1 Brief History of Linear Programming The goal of linear programming is to determine the values of

### ORDERS OF ELEMENTS IN A GROUP

ORDERS OF ELEMENTS IN A GROUP KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction Let G be a group and g G. We say g has finite order if g n = e for some positive integer n. For example, 1 and i have finite order in C, since

### MATH 289 PROBLEM SET 1: INDUCTION. 1. The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear:

MATH 89 PROBLEM SET : INDUCTION The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear: Axiom Every nonempty subset of the set of nonnegative integers Z 0 = {0,,, 3,

### 2.3 Convex Constrained Optimization Problems

42 CHAPTER 2. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN CONVEX OPTIMIZATION Theorem 15 Let f : R n R and h : R R. Consider g(x) = h(f(x)) for all x R n. The function g is convex if either of the following two conditions

### The Dirichlet Unit Theorem

Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if

### CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZERO SUM PROBLEMS

CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZERO SUM PROBLEMS S. D. ADHIKARI, Y. G. CHEN, J. B. FRIEDLANDER, S. V. KONYAGIN AND F. PAPPALARDI Abstract. A prototype of zero sum theorems, the well known theorem of Erdős, Ginzburg

### SHARP BOUNDS FOR THE SUM OF THE SQUARES OF THE DEGREES OF A GRAPH

31 Kragujevac J. Math. 25 (2003) 31 49. SHARP BOUNDS FOR THE SUM OF THE SQUARES OF THE DEGREES OF A GRAPH Kinkar Ch. Das Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, W.B.,

### On the Union of Arithmetic Progressions

On the Union of Arithmetic Progressions Shoni Gilboa Rom Pinchasi August, 04 Abstract We show that for any integer n and real ɛ > 0, the union of n arithmetic progressions with pairwise distinct differences,

### Probability Generating Functions

page 39 Chapter 3 Probability Generating Functions 3 Preamble: Generating Functions Generating functions are widely used in mathematics, and play an important role in probability theory Consider a sequence

### Probability and Statistics Prof. Dr. Somesh Kumar Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Probability and Statistics Prof. Dr. Somesh Kumar Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Module No. #01 Lecture No. #15 Special Distributions-VI Today, I am going to introduce

### Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011

Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely

### Prime Numbers. Chapter Primes and Composites

Chapter 2 Prime Numbers The term factoring or factorization refers to the process of expressing an integer as the product of two or more integers in a nontrivial way, e.g., 42 = 6 7. Prime numbers are

### The Trip Scheduling Problem

The Trip Scheduling Problem Claudia Archetti Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Brescia Contrada Santa Chiara 50, 25122 Brescia, Italy Martin Savelsbergh School of Industrial and Systems

### 6. Metric spaces. In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. d : X X [0, )

6. Metric spaces In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. Definitions. A metric on a non-empty set X is a map with the following properties: d : X X [0, ) (i) If x, y X are points

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics

Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some

### Information Theory and Coding Prof. S. N. Merchant Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

Information Theory and Coding Prof. S. N. Merchant Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 17 Shannon-Fano-Elias Coding and Introduction to Arithmetic Coding

### Section 1.1. Introduction to R n

The Calculus of Functions of Several Variables Section. Introduction to R n Calculus is the study of functional relationships and how related quantities change with each other. In your first exposure to

### Chapter 2 Limits Functions and Sequences sequence sequence Example

Chapter Limits In the net few chapters we shall investigate several concepts from calculus, all of which are based on the notion of a limit. In the normal sequence of mathematics courses that students

### Modern Optimization Methods for Big Data Problems MATH11146 The University of Edinburgh

Modern Optimization Methods for Big Data Problems MATH11146 The University of Edinburgh Peter Richtárik Week 3 Randomized Coordinate Descent With Arbitrary Sampling January 27, 2016 1 / 30 The Problem

### Mathematics for Economics (Part I) Note 5: Convex Sets and Concave Functions

Natalia Lazzati Mathematics for Economics (Part I) Note 5: Convex Sets and Concave Functions Note 5 is based on Madden (1986, Ch. 1, 2, 4 and 7) and Simon and Blume (1994, Ch. 13 and 21). Concave functions

### Sets and functions. {x R : x > 0}.

Sets and functions 1 Sets The language of sets and functions pervades mathematics, and most of the important operations in mathematics turn out to be functions or to be expressible in terms of functions.

### DEGREES OF ORDERS ON TORSION-FREE ABELIAN GROUPS

DEGREES OF ORDERS ON TORSION-FREE ABELIAN GROUPS ASHER M. KACH, KAREN LANGE, AND REED SOLOMON Abstract. We construct two computable presentations of computable torsion-free abelian groups, one of isomorphism

### Large induced subgraphs with all degrees odd

Large induced subgraphs with all degrees odd A.D. Scott Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambridge, England Abstract: We prove that every connected graph of order

### Lecture 7: Approximation via Randomized Rounding

Lecture 7: Approximation via Randomized Rounding Often LPs return a fractional solution where the solution x, which is supposed to be in {0, } n, is in [0, ] n instead. There is a generic way of obtaining

### If the sets {A i } are pairwise disjoint, then µ( i=1 A i) =

Note: A standing homework assignment for students in MAT1501 is: let me know about any mistakes, misprints, ambiguities etc that you find in these notes. 1. measures and measurable sets If X is a set,

### Chapter 3 LINEAR PROGRAMMING GRAPHICAL SOLUTION 3.1 SOLUTION METHODS 3.2 TERMINOLOGY

Chapter 3 LINEAR PROGRAMMING GRAPHICAL SOLUTION 3.1 SOLUTION METHODS Once the problem is formulated by setting appropriate objective function and constraints, the next step is to solve it. Solving LPP

### Planar Tree Transformation: Results and Counterexample

Planar Tree Transformation: Results and Counterexample Selim G Akl, Kamrul Islam, and Henk Meijer School of Computing, Queen s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 Abstract We consider the problem

### SUBGROUPS OF CYCLIC GROUPS. 1. Introduction In a group G, we denote the (cyclic) group of powers of some g G by

SUBGROUPS OF CYCLIC GROUPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction In a group G, we denote the (cyclic) group of powers of some g G by g = {g k : k Z}. If G = g, then G itself is cyclic, with g as a generator. Examples

### Elements of probability theory

2 Elements of probability theory Probability theory provides mathematical models for random phenomena, that is, phenomena which under repeated observations yield di erent outcomes that cannot be predicted

### OPRE 6201 : 2. Simplex Method

OPRE 6201 : 2. Simplex Method 1 The Graphical Method: An Example Consider the following linear program: Max 4x 1 +3x 2 Subject to: 2x 1 +3x 2 6 (1) 3x 1 +2x 2 3 (2) 2x 2 5 (3) 2x 1 +x 2 4 (4) x 1, x 2

### FIRST YEAR CALCULUS. Chapter 7 CONTINUITY. It is a parabola, and we can draw this parabola without lifting our pencil from the paper.

FIRST YEAR CALCULUS WWLCHENW L c WWWL W L Chen, 1982, 2008. 2006. This chapter originates from material used by the author at Imperial College, University of London, between 1981 and 1990. It It is is

### Mathematics Review for MS Finance Students

Mathematics Review for MS Finance Students Anthony M. Marino Department of Finance and Business Economics Marshall School of Business Lecture 1: Introductory Material Sets The Real Number System Functions,

### The Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem

The Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem COS 528 class notes October 18, 2006 Scribe: Dávid Papp Main idea: use of the blocking flow paradigm to achieve essentially O(min{m 2/3, n 1/2 }

### Mathematics for Econometrics, Fourth Edition

Mathematics for Econometrics, Fourth Edition Phoebus J. Dhrymes 1 July 2012 1 c Phoebus J. Dhrymes, 2012. Preliminary material; not to be cited or disseminated without the author s permission. 2 Contents

### IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL. 1. Introduction

IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL R. DRNOVŠEK, T. KOŠIR Dedicated to Prof. Heydar Radjavi on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. Abstract. Let S be an irreducible

### Matrix Algebra LECTURE 1. Simultaneous Equations Consider a system of m linear equations in n unknowns: y 1 = a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 + +a 1n x n,

LECTURE 1 Matrix Algebra Simultaneous Equations Consider a system of m linear equations in n unknowns: y 1 a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 + +a 1n x n, (1) y 2 a 21 x 1 + a 22 x 2 + +a 2n x n, y m a m1 x 1 +a m2 x

### Cycles in a Graph Whose Lengths Differ by One or Two

Cycles in a Graph Whose Lengths Differ by One or Two J. A. Bondy 1 and A. Vince 2 1 LABORATOIRE DE MATHÉMATIQUES DISCRÉTES UNIVERSITÉ CLAUDE-BERNARD LYON 1 69622 VILLEURBANNE, FRANCE 2 DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS

### NOTES ON MEASURE THEORY. M. Papadimitrakis Department of Mathematics University of Crete. Autumn of 2004

NOTES ON MEASURE THEORY M. Papadimitrakis Department of Mathematics University of Crete Autumn of 2004 2 Contents 1 σ-algebras 7 1.1 σ-algebras............................... 7 1.2 Generated σ-algebras.........................

### Some Notes on Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series

Some Notes on Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Mark MacLean October 3, 27 UBC s courses MATH /8 and MATH introduce students to the ideas of Taylor polynomials and Taylor series in a fairly limited

### ISOMETRIES OF R n KEITH CONRAD

ISOMETRIES OF R n KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction An isometry of R n is a function h: R n R n that preserves the distance between vectors: h(v) h(w) = v w for all v and w in R n, where (x 1,..., x n ) = x

### Geometry of Linear Programming

Chapter 2 Geometry of Linear Programming The intent of this chapter is to provide a geometric interpretation of linear programming problems. To conceive fundamental concepts and validity of different algorithms

### SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3. Spaces with special properties

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3 Fall 2008 III. Spaces with special properties III.1 : Compact spaces I Problems from Munkres, 26, pp. 170 172 3. Show that a finite union of compact subspaces

### Some Polynomial Theorems. John Kennedy Mathematics Department Santa Monica College 1900 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 rkennedy@ix.netcom.

Some Polynomial Theorems by John Kennedy Mathematics Department Santa Monica College 1900 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 rkennedy@ix.netcom.com This paper contains a collection of 31 theorems, lemmas,

### Axiom A.1. Lines, planes and space are sets of points. Space contains all points.

73 Appendix A.1 Basic Notions We take the terms point, line, plane, and space as undefined. We also use the concept of a set and a subset, belongs to or is an element of a set. In a formal axiomatic approach

### A simple criterion on degree sequences of graphs

Discrete Applied Mathematics 156 (2008) 3513 3517 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Discrete Applied Mathematics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dam Note A simple criterion on degree

Approximation Algorithms Chapter Approximation Algorithms Q. Suppose I need to solve an NP-hard problem. What should I do? A. Theory says you're unlikely to find a poly-time algorithm. Must sacrifice one

### Euclidean Geometry. We start with the idea of an axiomatic system. An axiomatic system has four parts:

Euclidean Geometry Students are often so challenged by the details of Euclidean geometry that they miss the rich structure of the subject. We give an overview of a piece of this structure below. We start

### CARDINALITY, COUNTABLE AND UNCOUNTABLE SETS PART ONE

CARDINALITY, COUNTABLE AND UNCOUNTABLE SETS PART ONE With the notion of bijection at hand, it is easy to formalize the idea that two finite sets have the same number of elements: we just need to verify

### Problem Set. Problem Set #2. Math 5322, Fall December 3, 2001 ANSWERS

Problem Set Problem Set #2 Math 5322, Fall 2001 December 3, 2001 ANSWERS i Problem 1. [Problem 18, page 32] Let A P(X) be an algebra, A σ the collection of countable unions of sets in A, and A σδ the collection

### Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics An Introductory Single Variable Real Analysis: A Learning Approach through Problem Solving Marcel B. Finan c All Rights

### Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes

Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes Peter J. Olver 5. Inner Products and Norms The norm of a vector is a measure of its size. Besides the familiar Euclidean norm based on the dot product, there are a number

### INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS

INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS STEVEN P. LALLEY AND ANDREW NOBEL Abstract. It is shown that there are no consistent decision rules for the hypothesis testing problem

### Lattice Point Geometry: Pick s Theorem and Minkowski s Theorem. Senior Exercise in Mathematics. Jennifer Garbett Kenyon College

Lattice Point Geometry: Pick s Theorem and Minkowski s Theorem Senior Exercise in Mathematics Jennifer Garbett Kenyon College November 18, 010 Contents 1 Introduction 1 Primitive Lattice Triangles 5.1

### No: 10 04. Bilkent University. Monotonic Extension. Farhad Husseinov. Discussion Papers. Department of Economics

No: 10 04 Bilkent University Monotonic Extension Farhad Husseinov Discussion Papers Department of Economics The Discussion Papers of the Department of Economics are intended to make the initial results

### discuss how to describe points, lines and planes in 3 space.

Chapter 2 3 Space: lines and planes In this chapter we discuss how to describe points, lines and planes in 3 space. introduce the language of vectors. discuss various matters concerning the relative position

### Limits and convergence.

Chapter 2 Limits and convergence. 2.1 Limit points of a set of real numbers 2.1.1 Limit points of a set. DEFINITION: A point x R is a limit point of a set E R if for all ε > 0 the set (x ε,x + ε) E is

### BANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW

BANACH AND HILBET SPACE EVIEW CHISTOPHE HEIL These notes will briefly review some basic concepts related to the theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces. We are not trying to give a complete development, but

### Stochastic Inventory Control

Chapter 3 Stochastic Inventory Control 1 In this chapter, we consider in much greater details certain dynamic inventory control problems of the type already encountered in section 1.3. In addition to the

### Chapter 7. BANDIT PROBLEMS.

Chapter 7. BANDIT PROBLEMS. Bandit problems are problems in the area of sequential selection of experiments, and they are related to stopping rule problems through the theorem of Gittins and Jones (974).

### This chapter describes set theory, a mathematical theory that underlies all of modern mathematics.

Appendix A Set Theory This chapter describes set theory, a mathematical theory that underlies all of modern mathematics. A.1 Basic Definitions Definition A.1.1. A set is an unordered collection of elements.

### Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are

### On spare parts optimization

On spare parts optimization Krister Svanberg Optimization and Systems Theory, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden. krille@math.kth.se This manuscript deals with some mathematical optimization models for multi-level

### Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a one-cycle criterion

Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a one-cycle criterion P. Coolen-Schrijner, F.P.A. Coolen Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK e-mail: Pauline.Schrijner@durham.ac.uk

### You know from calculus that functions play a fundamental role in mathematics.

CHPTER 12 Functions You know from calculus that functions play a fundamental role in mathematics. You likely view a function as a kind of formula that describes a relationship between two (or more) quantities.

### CHAPTER 3. Sequences. 1. Basic Properties

CHAPTER 3 Sequences We begin our study of analysis with sequences. There are several reasons for starting here. First, sequences are the simplest way to introduce limits, the central idea of calculus.

### Homework MA 725 Spring, 2012 C. Huneke SELECTED ANSWERS

Homework MA 725 Spring, 2012 C. Huneke SELECTED ANSWERS 1.1.25 Prove that the Petersen graph has no cycle of length 7. Solution: There are 10 vertices in the Petersen graph G. Assume there is a cycle C

### Wald s Identity. by Jeffery Hein. Dartmouth College, Math 100

Wald s Identity by Jeffery Hein Dartmouth College, Math 100 1. Introduction Given random variables X 1, X 2, X 3,... with common finite mean and a stopping rule τ which may depend upon the given sequence,

### TAKE-AWAY GAMES. ALLEN J. SCHWENK California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California INTRODUCTION

TAKE-AWAY GAMES ALLEN J. SCHWENK California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California L INTRODUCTION Several games of Tf take-away?f have become popular. The purpose of this paper is to determine the

### Betweenness of Points

Math 444/445 Geometry for Teachers Summer 2008 Supplement : Rays, ngles, and etweenness This handout is meant to be read in place of Sections 5.6 5.7 in Venema s text [V]. You should read these pages after

### P (A) = lim P (A) = N(A)/N,

1.1 Probability, Relative Frequency and Classical Definition. Probability is the study of random or non-deterministic experiments. Suppose an experiment can be repeated any number of times, so that we

### We call this set an n-dimensional parallelogram (with one vertex 0). We also refer to the vectors x 1,..., x n as the edges of P.

Volumes of parallelograms 1 Chapter 8 Volumes of parallelograms In the present short chapter we are going to discuss the elementary geometrical objects which we call parallelograms. These are going to