Q: What is CVSS? Q: Who developed CVSS?
|
|
|
- Dorthy McDowell
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CVSS FAQ Q: What is CVSS? Q: Who developed CVSS? Q: What does CVSS not do? Q: What is involved in CVSS? Q: What are the details of the Base Metrics? Q: What are the details of the Temporal Metrics? Q: What are the details of the Environment Metrics? Q: How is the scoring done? Q: Is there an easier way to understand all this? Q: Where can I get the hardcore details of the scoring formulas? Q: Who is using CVSS? Q: I am an end-user (CISO/CSO/operations security person), is there anything I need to do? Q: I am an application or product security vendor, why should I use CVSS and publish CVSS temporal scores? Q: I am an end-user, and really like other vendors scoring methods, why should I change to CVSS? Q: What does CVSS really offer that other scoring methodologies do not? Q: Where can I get the CVSS code? Q: How can I help establish CVSS through out the industry? Q: Where can I get more information on CVSS?
2 Q: What is CVSS? A: CVSS stands for The Common Vulnerability Scoring System and is a vendor agnostic, industry open standard designed to convey vulnerability severity and help determine urgency and priority of response. It solves the problem of multiple, incompatible scoring systems and is usable and understandable by anyone. Q: Who developed CVSS? A: CVSS was commissioned by the National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC) tasked in support of the global Vulnerability Disclosure Framework. It is currently maintained by FIRST (Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams) CVSS was a joint effort involving many groups including: CERT/CC Cisco DHS/MITRE ebay Internet Security Systems Microsoft Qualys Symantec
3 Q: What does CVSS not do? A: CVSS is not a Threat scoring system (DHS color warning system), a Vulnerability database or a Real-time attack scoring system. Q: What is involved in CVSS? A: The CVSS model is designed to provide the end user with an overall composite score representing the severity and risk of a vulnerability. It is derived from metrics and formulas. The metrics are in three distinct categories that can be quantitatively or qualitatively measured. Base Metrics contain qualities that are intrinsic to any given vulnerability that do not change over time or in different environments. Temporal Metrics contain characteristics of a vulnerability which evolve over the lifetime of vulnerability. Environmental Metrics contain those characteristics of a vulnerability which are tied to an implementation in a specific user s environment.
4 Q: What are the details of the Base Metrics? A: There are seven Base Metrics which represent the most fundamental, immutable qualities of a vulnerability. 1) Access Vector measures whether a vulnerability is exploitable locally or remotely. Local: The vulnerability is only exploitable locally Remote: The vulnerability is exploitable remotely (and possibly locally as well) 2) Access Complexity measures the complexity of attack required to exploit the vulnerability once an attacker has access to the target system. High: Specialized access conditions exist such as specific window of time (a race condition), specific circumstance (non-default configurations) or victim interaction such as tainted attachment. Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. In other words, it is always exploitable. This is the most common case. 3) Authentication measures whether or not an attacker needs to be authenticated to the target system in order to exploit the vulnerability. Required: Authentication is required to access and exploit the vulnerability. Not Required: Authentication is not required to access or exploit the vulnerability. 4) Confidentiality Impact measures the impact on Confidentiality of a successful exploit of the vulnerability on the target system. None: No impact on confidentiality. Partial: There is considerable informational disclosure. Complete: A total compromise of critical system information. 5) Integrity Impact measures the impact on Integrity of a successful exploit of the vulnerability on the target system. None: No impact on integrity. Partial: Considerable breach in integrity. Complete: A total compromise of system integrity. 6) Availability Impact measures the impact on Availability of a successful exploit of the vulnerability on the target system. None: No impact on availability Partial: Considerable lag in or interruptions in resource availability Complete: Total shutdown of the affected resource
5 7) Impact Bias allows a score to convey greater weighting to one of three impact metrics over the other two Normal: Confidentiality Impact, Integrity Impact, and Availability Impact are all assigned the same weight. Confidentiality: Confidentiality impact is assigned greater weight than Integrity Impact or Availability Impact. Integrity: Integrity Impact is assigned greater weight than Confidentiality Impact or Availability Impact. Availability: Availability Impact is assigned greater weight than Confidentiality Impact or Integrity Impact.. Q: What are the details of the Temporal Metrics? A: There are three Temporal Metrics which represent the time dependent qualities of a vulnerability. 1) Exploitability measures how complex the process is to exploit the vulnerability in the target system. Unproven: No exploit code is yet available Proof of Concept: Proof of concept exploit code is available Functional: Functional exploit code is available High: Exploitable by functional mobile autonomous code or no exploit required (manual trigger) 2) Remediation Level measures the level of an available solution. Official Fix: Complete vendor solution available Temporary Fix: There is an official temporary fix available Workaround: There is an unofficial non-vendor solution available Unavailable: There is either no solution available or it is impossible to apply 3) Report Confidence measures the degree of confidence in the existence of the vulnerability and the credibility of its report. Unconfirmed: A single unconfirmed source or possibly several conflicting reports Uncorroborated: Multiple non-official sources; possibly including independent security companies or research organizations Confirmed: Vendor has reported/confirmed a problem with its own product
6 Q: What are the details of the Environment Metrics? A: There are two Environmental Metrics which represent the implementation and environment specific qualities of a vulnerability. 1) Collateral Damage Potential measures the potential for a loss of physical equipment, property damage or loss of life or limb. None: There is no potential for property damage. Low: A successful exploit of this vulnerability may result in light property damage or loss. Medium: A successful exploit of this vulnerability may result in significant property damage or loss. High: A successful exploit of this vulnerability may result in catastrophic property damage and loss. 2) Target Distribution measures the relative size of the field of target systems susceptible to the vulnerability. None: No target systems exist, or targets are so highly specialized that they only exist in a laboratory setting (0%) Low: Targets exist inside the environment, but on a small scale (1% - 15%) Medium: Targets exist inside the environment, but on a medium scale (16% - 49%) High: Targets exist inside the environment on a considerable scale (50% - 100%)
7 Q: How is the scoring done? A: Scoring is the process of combining all the metric values according to specific formulas. Base Scoring is computed by the vendor or originator with the intention of being published and once set, is not expected to change. It is computed from the big three confidentiality, integrity and availability. This is the foundation which is modified by the Temporal and Environmental metrics. The base score has the largest bearing on the final score and represents vulnerability severity. Temporal Scoring is also computed by vendors and coordinators for publication, and modifies the Base score. It allows for the introduction of mitigating factors to reduce the score of a vulnerability and is designed to be re-evaluated at specific intervals as a vulnerability ages. The temporal score represents vulnerability urgency at specific points in time. Environmental Scoring is optionally computed by end-user organizations and adjusts combined Base-Temporal score. This should be considered the FINAL score and represents a snapshot in time, tailored to a specific environment. User organizations should use this to prioritize responses within their own environments
8 Q: Is there an easier way to understand all this? A: Yes. This flowchart shows each metric group and how they interrelate with each other.
9 Q: Where can I get the hardcore details of the scoring formulas? A: Read the NIAC Paper on CVSS at 04.pdf. Q: Who is using CVSS? A: NIAC was submitted to the President in January DHS (Department of Homeland Security) and CVSS developers are encouraging widespread, voluntary adoption. Currently several NIAC member companies (Union Pacific, American Water, Symantec, Akamai) have adopted CVSS with others (CERT/CC, US-CERT, Qualys, Cisco) following. Q: I am an end-user (CISO/CSO/operations security person), is there anything I need to do? A: Typically, application and security product vendors will provide both the Base and Temporal scores. As the end user, you need only calculate your Environmental score.
10 Q: I am an application or product security vendor, why should I use CVSS and publish CVSS temporal scores? A: As more vendors begin publishing CVSS scores, more customers will understand and appreciate the advantages. They will grow to appreciate the ability to tailor scores to their environment and begin expect CVSS scores of all their suppliers. The more it is used, the better it works. Q: I am an end-user, and really like other vendors scoring methods, why should I change to CVSS? A: Other systems are closed competing standards, do not offer a mutable scoring framework, and do not consider different environments. Q: What does CVSS really offer that other scoring methodologies do not? A: An open framework that can be used, understood, and improved upon by anybody to score vulnerabilities.
11 Q: Where can I get the CVSS code? A: CVSS is a framework that you can use to develop an application suitable to your needs, your environment or your customers. There is no established code as of yet. However here is a sample Excel spreadsheet (zipped), and also a CVSS web page calculator Q: How can I help establish CVSS through out the industry? A: Urge your vendors to support CVSS scoring. Q: Where can I get more information on CVSS? A: You can get more information at FIRST, the current custodian for CVSS at Here is also the first NIAC Paper on CVSS at
SECURITY METRICS FOR ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SECURITY METRICS FOR ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS Victor-Valeriu PATRICIU PhD, University Professor Department of Computer Engineering Military Technical Academy, Bucharest, Romania E-mail: [email protected]
Enterprise Software Management Systems by Using Security Metrics
Enterprise Software Management Systems by Using Security Metrics Bhanudas S. Panchabhai 1, A. N. Patil 2 1 Department of Computer Science, R. C. Patel Arts, Commerce and Science College, Shirpur, Maharashtra,
SECURITY ADVISORY. December 2008 Barracuda Load Balancer admin login Cross-site Scripting
SECURITY ADVISORY December 2008 Barracuda Load Balancer admin login Cross-site Scripting Discovered in December 2008 by FortConsult s Security Research Team/Jan Skovgren WARNING NOT FOR DISCLOSURE BEFORE
A Complete Guide to the Common Vulnerability Scoring System Version 2.0
A Complete Guide to the Common Vulnerability Scoring System Version 2.0 June, 2007 Peter Mell, Karen Scarfone National Institute of Standards Sasha Romanosky Carnegie Mellon University and Technology Acknowledgements:
McAfee Vulnerability Manager 7.0.2
McAfee Vulnerability Manager 7.0.2 The McAfee Vulnerability Manager 7.0.2 quarterly release adds features to the product without having to wait for the next major release. This technical note contains
6. Exercise: Writing Security Advisories
CERT Exercises Toolset 49 49 6. Exercise: Writing Security Advisories Main Objective Targeted Audience Total Duration Time Schedule Frequency The objective of the exercise is to provide a practical overview
Software Vulnerability Assessment
Software Vulnerability Assessment Setup Guide Contents: About Software Vulnerability Assessment Setting Up and Running a Vulnerability Scan Manage Ongoing Vulnerability Scans Perform Regularly Scheduled
Cisco Security IntelliShield Alert Manager Service
Data Sheet Cisco Security IntelliShield Alert Manager Service The Cisco Security IntelliShield Alert Manager Service provides a comprehensive, cost-effective solution for delivering the security intelligence
Vulnerability Management Nirvana: A Study in Predicting Exploitability
SESSION ID: TECH-F01 Vulnerability Management Nirvana: A Study in Predicting Exploitability Kymberlee Price Senior Director of Operations Bugcrowd @Kym_Possible Michael Roytman Senior Data Scientist Risk
Common Vulnerability Scoring System v3.0: Specification Document
Common Vulnerability Scoring System v3.0: Specification Document The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) is an open framework for communicating the characteristics and severity of software vulnerabilities.
Security Vulnerabilities and Patches Explained IT Security Bulletin for the Government of Canada
Security Vulnerabilities and Patches Explained IT Security Bulletin for the Government of Canada ITSB-96 Last Updated: March 2015 1 Introduction Patching operating systems and applications is one of the
NIST Interagency Report 7502 The Common Configuration Scoring System (CCSS): Metrics for Software Security Configuration Vulnerabilities
NIST Interagency Report 7502 The Common Configuration Scoring System (CCSS): Metrics for Software Security Configuration Vulnerabilities Karen Scarfone Peter Mell NIST Interagency Report 7502 The Common
Security and Vulnerability Issues in University Networks
, July 6-8, 2011, London, U.K. Security and Vulnerability Issues in University Networks Sanad Al Maskari, Dinesh Kumar Saini, Swati Y Raut and Lingraj A Hadimani Abstract The paper deals with security
Information Security Risk Assessment Methodology
Information Security Risk Assessment Methodology An Information security risk assessment should take into account system-level risk (inclusive of applications and systems) and process-level risk (inclusive
Guideline on Vulnerability and Patch Management
CMSGu2014-03 Mauritian Computer Emergency Response Team CERT-MU SECURITY GUIDELINE 2011-02 Enhancing Cyber Security in Mauritius Guideline on Vulnerability and Patch Management National Computer Board
Pentests more than just using the proper tools
Pentests more than just using the proper tools Agenda 1. Information Security @ TÜV Rheinland 2. Security testing 3. Penetration testing Introduction Evaluation scheme Security Analyses of web applications
Pentests more than just using the proper tools
Pentests more than just using the proper tools Agenda 1. Information Security @ TÜV Rheinland 2. Penetration testing Introduction Evaluation scheme Security Analyses of web applications Internal Security
ITIL by Test-king. Exam code: ITIL-F. Exam name: ITIL Foundation. Version 15.0
ITIL by Test-king Number: ITIL-F Passing Score: 800 Time Limit: 120 min File Version: 15.0 Sections 1. Service Management as a practice 2. The Service Lifecycle 3. Generic concepts and definitions 4. Key
Web Application Security. Sajjad Pourali [email protected] CERT of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
Web Application Security Sajjad Pourali [email protected] CERT of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Take away Why web application security is very important Understanding web application security How
White Paper The Dynamic Nature of Virtualization Security
White Paper The Dynamic Nature of Virtualization Security The need for real-time vulnerability management and risk assessment Introduction Virtualization is radically shifting how enterprises deploy, deliver,
State of Minnesota. Office of Enterprise Technology (OET) Enterprise Vulnerability Management Security Standard
State of Minnesota Office of Enterprise Technology (OET) Enterprise Vulnerability Management Security Standard Approval: Enterprise Security Office (ESO) Standard Version 1.00 Gopal Khanna
Assuria Auditor The Configuration Assurance, Vulnerability Assessment, Change Detection and Policy Compliance Reporting Solution for Enterprise
Assuria Auditor The Configuration Assurance, Vulnerability Assessment, Change Detection and Policy Compliance Reporting Solution for Enterprise 1. Introduction Information security means protecting information
WHITE PAPER ON SECURITY TESTING IN TELECOM NETWORK
WHITE PAPER ON SECURITY TESTING IN TELECOM NETWORK DATE OF RELEASE: 27 th July 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Need for securing Telecom Networks... 3 3. Security Assessment Techniques...
Information security risk management using ISO/IEC 27005:2008
Information security risk management using ISO/IEC 27005:2008 Hervé Cholez / Sébastien Pineau Centre de Recherche Public Henri Tudor [email protected] [email protected] March, 29 th 2011 1
CDM Vulnerability Management (VUL) Capability
CDM Vulnerability Management (VUL) Capability Department of Homeland Security Office of Cybersecurity and Communications Federal Network Resilience Vulnerability Management Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation
Information Security Office
Information Security Office SAMPLE Risk Assessment and Compliance Report Restricted Information (RI). Submitted to: SAMPLE CISO CIO CTO Submitted: SAMPLE DATE Prepared by: SAMPLE Appendices attached: Appendix
ADDING NETWORK INTELLIGENCE TO VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT
ADDING NETWORK INTELLIGENCE INTRODUCTION Vulnerability management is crucial to network security. Not only are known vulnerabilities propagating dramatically, but so is their severity and complexity. Organizations
An Information Security and Privacy Perspective for Procurement Services Projects
MANAGEMENT OF DATA: An Information Security and Privacy Perspective for Procurement Services Projects Presentation for: Procurement Services Senior Leadership Meeting Presented by: Ann Nagel, Associate
Integrated Network Vulnerability Scanning & Penetration Testing SAINTcorporation.com
SAINT Integrated Network Vulnerability Scanning and Penetration Testing www.saintcorporation.com Introduction While network vulnerability scanning is an important tool in proactive network security, penetration
Is Penetration Testing recommended for Industrial Control Systems?
Is Penetration Testing recommended for Industrial Control Systems? By Ngai Chee Ban, CISSP, Honeywell Process Solutions, Asia Pacific Cyber Security Assessment for Industrial Automation Conducting a cyber-security
A Software Security Assessment System Based On Analysis of
A Software Security Assessment System Based On Analysis of Vulnerabilities 1,2 Chenmeng Sui, 1 Yanzhao Liu, 2 Yun Liu, 1 China Information Technology Security Evaluation Center, Beijing,China,[email protected]
HIPAA Security. 6 Basics of Risk Analysis and Risk Management. Security Topics
HIPAA Security SERIES Security Topics 1. Security 101 for Covered Entities 2. Security Standards - Administrative Safeguards 3. Security Standards - Physical Safeguards 4. Security Standards - Technical
Information Security and Continuity Management Information Sharing Portal. Category: Risk Management Initiatives
Information Security and Continuity Management Information Sharing Portal Category: Risk Management Initiatives Contact: Chip Moore, CISO State of North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services
Data Privacy and Gramm- Leach-Bliley Act Section 501(b)
Data Privacy and Gramm- Leach-Bliley Act Section 501(b) October 2007 2007 Enterprise Risk Management, Inc. Agenda Introduction and Fundamentals Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Section 501(b) GLBA Life Cycle Enforcement
a Medical Device Privacy Consortium White Paper
a Medical Device Privacy Consortium White Paper Introduction The Medical Device Privacy Consortium (MDPC) is a group of leading companies addressing health privacy and security issues affecting the medical
Payment Card Industry (PCI) Executive Report 08/04/2014
Payment Card Industry (PCI) Executive Report 08/04/2014 ASV Scan Report Attestation of Scan Compliance Scan Customer Information Approved Scanning Vendor Information Company: A.B. Yazamut Company: Qualys
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Audit Report The Department's Configuration Management of Non-Financial Systems OAS-M-12-02 February 2012 Department
Network Detective. HIPAA Compliance Module. 2015 RapidFire Tools, Inc. All rights reserved V20150201
Network Detective 2015 RapidFire Tools, Inc. All rights reserved V20150201 Contents Purpose of this Guide... 3 About Network Detective... 3 Overview... 4 Creating a Site... 5 Starting a HIPAA Assessment...
1. For each of the 25 questions, multiply each question response risk value (1-5) by the number of times it was chosen by the survey takers.
Employee Security Awareness Survey Trenton Bond [email protected] Admin - Version 1.3 Security Awareness One of the most significant security risks that organizations and corporations face today is
Pragmatic Metrics for Building Security Dashboards
SESSION ID: GRC-W03 Pragmatic Metrics for Building Security Dashboards James Tarala Principal Consultant Enclave Security @isaudit Problem Statement What s measured improves. Peter Drucker In an era of
Web application security Executive brief Managing a growing threat: an executive s guide to Web application security.
Web application security Executive brief Managing a growing threat: an executive s guide to Web application security. Danny Allan, strategic research analyst, IBM Software Group Contents 2 Introduction
Avoiding the Top 5 Vulnerability Management Mistakes
WHITE PAPER Avoiding the Top 5 Vulnerability Management Mistakes The New Rules of Vulnerability Management Table of Contents Introduction 3 We ve entered an unprecedented era 3 Mistake 1: Disjointed Vulnerability
CYBERSECURITY BEST PRACTICES FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM PENNSYLVANIA UTILITIES
CYBERSECURITY BEST PRACTICES FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM PENNSYLVANIA UTILITIES The information provided in this document is presented as a courtesy to be used for informational purposes only. This information
PCI Vulnerability Validation Report
Friday, March 9, 013 PCI Vulnerability Validation Report Introduction This report shows the results of a vulnerability validation tests conducted by CORE Impact Professional Professional in support of
Examining the Evolving Cyber Insurance Marketplace
Prepared Testimony and Statement for the Record of Ola Sage Founder and CEO e-management Hearing on Examining the Evolving Cyber Insurance Marketplace Before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science,
Threat Modeling Architecting & Designing with Security in Mind OWASP. The OWASP Foundation http://www.owasp.org. Venkatesh Jagannathan
Threat Modeling Architecting & Designing with Security in Mind Venkatesh Jagannathan -Chennai Chapter Leader [email protected] [email protected] Copyright The Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute
Full-Context Forensic Analysis Using the SecureVue Unified Situational Awareness Platform
Full-Context Forensic Analysis Using the SecureVue Unified Situational Awareness Platform Solution Brief Full-Context Forensic Analysis Using the SecureVue Unified Situational Awareness Platform Finding
Top 5 Global Bank Selects Resolution1 for Cyber Incident Response.
MAJOR FINANCIAL SERVICES LEADER Top 5 Global Bank Selects Resolution1 for Cyber Incident Response. Automation and remote endpoint remediation reduce incident response (IR) times from 10 days to 5 hours.
Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems. NIST SP800-30 Overview
Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems NIST SP800-30 Overview 1 Risk Management Process that allows IT managers to balance operational and economic costs of protective measures and achieve
Patch Management Procedure. e-governance
for e-governance Draft DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Government of India. Document Control S/L Type of Information Document
How Boards of Directors Really Feel About Cyber Security Reports. Based on an Osterman Research survey
How Boards of Directors Really Feel About Cyber Security Reports Based on an Osterman Research survey Executive Summary 89% of board members said they are very involved in making cyber risk decisions Bay
Experience the commitment WHITE PAPER. Information Security Continuous Monitoring. Charting the Right Course. cgi.com 2014 CGI GROUP INC.
Experience the commitment WHITE PAPER Information Security Continuous Monitoring Charting the Right Course May 2014 cgi.com 2014 CGI GROUP INC. During the last few months of 2013, six federal agencies
EXIN.Passguide.EX0-001.v2014-10-25.by.SAM.424q. Exam Code: EX0-001. Exam Name: ITIL Foundation (syllabus 2011) Exam
EXIN.Passguide.EX0-001.v2014-10-25.by.SAM.424q Number: EX0-001 Passing Score: 800 Time Limit: 120 min File Version: 24.5 http://www.gratisexam.com/ Exam Code: EX0-001 Exam Name: ITIL Foundation (syllabus
What is required of a compliant Risk Assessment?
What is required of a compliant Risk Assessment? ACR 2 Solutions President Jack Kolk discusses the nine elements that the Office of Civil Rights requires Covered Entities perform when conducting a HIPAA
Open Data Center Alliance Usage: Provider Assurance Rev. 1.1
sm Open Data Center Alliance Usage: Provider Assurance Rev. 1.1 Legal Notice This Open Data Center Alliance SM Usage:Provider Assurance is proprietary to the Open Data Center Alliance, Inc. NOTICE TO USERS
Effective Threat Management. Building a complete lifecycle to manage enterprise threats.
Effective Threat Management Building a complete lifecycle to manage enterprise threats. Threat Management Lifecycle Assimilation of Operational Security Disciplines into an Interdependent System of Proactive
NIST CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORK COMPLIANCE WITH OBSERVEIT
NIST CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORK COMPLIANCE WITH OBSERVEIT OVERVIEW The National Institute of Standards of Technology Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity (The NIST Framework) is a
Practical Overview on responsibilities of Data Protection Officers. Security measures
Practical Overview on responsibilities of Data Protection Officers Security measures Manuel Villaseca Spanish Data Protection Agency [email protected] Security measures Agenda: The rol of DPO on security measures
GAO. INFORMATION SECURITY Persistent Weaknesses Highlight Need for Further Improvement
GAO For Release on Delivery Expected at time 1:00 p.m. EDT Thursday, April 19, 2007 United States Government Accountability Office Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity,
Vulnerability management lifecycle: defining vulnerability management
Framework for building a vulnerability management lifecycle program http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/magazinecontent/framework-for-building-avulnerability-management-lifecycle-program August 2011 By
I N T E L L I G E N C E A S S E S S M E N T
I N T E L L I G E N C E A S S E S S M E N T (U//FOUO) Malicious Cyber Actors Target US Universities and Colleges 16 January 2015 Office of Intelligence and Analysis IA-0090-15 (U) Warning: This document
cyberr by e-management The Leader in Cybersecurity Risk Intelligence (RI) Cybersecurity Risk: What You Don t Know CAN Hurt You!
cyberr by e-management The Leader in Cybersecurity Risk Intelligence (RI) Cybersecurity Risk: What You Don t Know CAN Hurt You! Cybersecurity is all over the news. Target, University of Maryland, Neiman
CBEST FAQ February 2015
CBEST Frequently Asked Questions: February 2015 At this time, the UK Financial Authorities have only made CBEST available to firms and FMIs which they consider to be core to the UK financial system. Those
3 Web Services Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Countermeasures
3 Web Services Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Countermeasures Securing a Web service requires us to protect, as far as possible, all of its basic components, shown in Figure 3.1, and their interactions
CPNI VIEWPOINT CONFIGURING AND MANAGING REMOTE ACCESS FOR INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS
CPNI VIEWPOINT CONFIGURING AND MANAGING REMOTE ACCESS FOR INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS MARCH 2011 Acknowledgements This Viewpoint is based upon the Recommended Practice: Configuring and Managing Remote Access
Collateral Effects of Cyberwar
Your texte here. Collateral Effects of Cyberwar by Ilia Kolochenko for Geneva Information Security Day 9 th of October 2015 Quick Facts and Numbers About Cybersecurity In 2014 the annual cost of global
MarketsandMarkets. http://www.marketresearch.com/marketsandmarkets-v3719/ Publisher Sample
MarketsandMarkets http://www.marketresearch.com/marketsandmarkets-v3719/ Publisher Sample Phone: 800.298.5699 (US) or +1.240.747.3093 or +1.240.747.3093 (Int'l) Hours: Monday - Thursday: 5:30am - 6:30pm
Vulnerability Risk Management 2.0. Best Practices for Managing Risk in the New Digital War
Vulnerability Risk Management 2.0 Best Practices for Managing Risk in the New Digital War In 2015, 17 new security vulnerabilities are identified every day. One nearly every 90 minutes. This consistent
Privacy & Security Crash Course: How Do I Do a Risk Assessment?
Privacy & Security Crash Course: How Do I Do a Risk Assessment? June 16, 2015 2015 Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All Rights Reserved. ebglaw.com Upcoming Webinars Privacy & Security Crash Course Series
INFORMATION SUPPLEMENT. Migrating from SSL and Early TLS. Version 1.0 Date: April 2015 Author: PCI Security Standards Council
Version 1.0 Date: Author: PCI Security Standards Council Executive Summary The time to migrate is now. For over 20 years Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) has been in the market as one of the most widely-used
Network Security and Vulnerability Assessment Solutions
Network Security and Vulnerability Assessment Solutions Unified Vulnerability Management It s a known fact that the exponential growth and successful exploitation of vulnerabilities create increasingly
CDM Hardware Asset Management (HWAM) Capability
CDM Hardware Asset Management (HWAM) Capability Department of Homeland Security Office of Cybersecurity and Communications Federal Network Resilience Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE... 2 2 THREAT
Guidance on Risk Analysis Requirements under the HIPAA Security Rule
Guidance on Risk Analysis Requirements under the HIPAA Security Rule Introduction The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for issuing annual guidance on the provisions in the HIPAA Security Rule.
AURORA Vulnerability Background
AURORA Vulnerability Background Southern California Edison (SCE) September 2011-1- Outline What is AURORA? Your Responsibility as a Customer Sectors Impacted by AURORA Review of Regulatory Agencies History
BEST PRACTICES IN CYBER SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT
BEST PRACTICES IN CYBER SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT Fujitsu Network Communications Managing Supply Chain Risks in Optical and Wireless Networking INTERVIEWS Barrie Hall Senior Vice President Fulfillment,
2016 Trends in Cybersecurity: A Quick Guide to the Most Important Insights in Security
2016 Trends in Cybersecurity: A Quick Guide to the Most Important Insights in Security For 10 years, Microsoft has been studying and analyzing the threat landscape of exploits, vulnerabilities, and malware.
Risk-Based IT Change Management
PNNL-SA-54320 Application for The Northwest Academic Computing Consortium Joanne R. Hugi Excellence Award Risk-Based IT Change Management Pacific Northwest National Laboratory IT Services Division Abstract:
Vulnerability Management
Vulnerability Management Buyer s Guide Buyer s Guide 01 Introduction 02 Key Components 03 Other Considerations About Rapid7 01 INTRODUCTION Exploiting weaknesses in browsers, operating systems and other
Information Security. Incident Management Program. What is an Incident Management Program? Why is it needed?
Information Security Incident Management Program What is an Incident Management Program? It is a coordinated program of people, processes, tools and technology, which prevents and manages information security
LOGIIC Remote Access. Final Public Report. June 2015 1 LOGIIC - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
LOGIIC Remote Access June 2015 Final Public Report Document Title LOGIIC Remote Monitoring Project Public Report Version Version 1.0 Primary Author A. McIntyre (SRI) Distribution Category LOGIIC Approved
THREAT VISIBILITY & VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
THREAT VISIBILITY & VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Date: April 15, 2015 IKANOW Analysts: Casey Pence IKANOW Platform Build: 1.34 11921 Freedom Drive, Reston, VA 20190 IKANOW.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Key Findings
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Safety First Quality Every Time 1 Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Planning Who here has a formal Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery plan? The purpose
7 Homeland. ty Grant Program HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM. Fiscal Year 2008
U.S. D EPARTMENT OF H OMELAND S ECURITY 7 Homeland Fiscal Year 2008 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM ty Grant Program SUPPLEMENTAL RESOURCE: CYBER SECURITY GUIDANCE uidelines and Application Kit (October
How To Use A Policy Auditor 6.2.2 (Macafee) To Check For Security Issues
Vendor Provided Validation Details - McAfee Policy Auditor 6.2 The following text was provided by the vendor during testing to describe how the product implements the specific capabilities. Statement of
