Tracking Study. Executive Summary

Transcription

1 Tracking Study Executive Summary August 2013

2 hudson howells august 2013 appendix 2 tabulated data & other responses 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background, Research Objective and Methodology In July 2011, Hudson Howells was engaged by the Local Association of South Australia (LGA) to undertake a brand and segmentation study. This tracking study follows on from that comprehensive study and focuses on unprompted and prompted awareness of local government and the perceptions that the community has of Local, State and Federal. The 2011 research findings provided the basis for the development of a social advocacy campaign which was developed and implemented by the LGA. The objective of this campaign was to create community awareness of Local (raise its profile) and position the Local brand favourably in the hearts and minds of the community. This report compares the 2013 research findings with the 2011 benchmark awareness levels and perceptions (attitudes) of the Local brand and assesses the effectiveness of the social advocacy campaign. In line with the 2011 survey, one questionnaire was developed for the entire survey (refer to Appendix 1). The survey sample was randomly drawn from metropolitan and country South Australia as follows: > Metropolitan South Australia = 400 respondents. > Country South Australia = 100 respondents. The survey was conducted by telephone using a current electronic database of residential telephone numbers. Each interview was undertaken with an adult in the household whose birthday was closest to the interview date.

3 hudson howells august 2013 appendix 2 tabulated data & other responses 3 The Research Findings Summarised The following section provides an overall summary of the key study findings: By far the most significant change for top of mind awareness is Council which increased from 13% to 36%. This is followed by Service Organisation which was nominated by 9% of the respondents and Charity also nominated by 9%. When asked which other organisations that provide services to the local community came to mind, 12% of respondents nominated Council (up from 8% in the 2011 survey) while 8% of total respondents nominated Charity (e.g. Red Cross, Salvation Army) and 7% nominated Service Organisation (e.g. Lions, Rotary). The total mentions for Council more than doubled from 21% in the 2011 survey to 47% in the 2013 survey (increase of 26%). The respondents who did not nominate Council in either of the two previous questions (first to mind or others) were then asked if they consider their local Council is an organisation that provides services to the local community. The majority (83%) of this sample answered yes they do with 5% being 'not sure'. This is consistent with the 2011 survey. The gender results show a slight female bias (55%) which is consistent with the 2011 survey. Just over a quarter of all respondents (28%) are in the 18 to 39 years age range which is higher than the 2011 survey (17%). This was offset by the 50 to 59 years age range which is 15% compared to 25% in the 2011 survey. Just over a third of all respondents (38%) claim to be in the retired category up from 28% in the 2011 survey. A quarter of all respondents (25%) have an annual household income between $20,000 and $40,000 which is consistent with the 2011 survey (24%). Conclusions It is clear from the survey findings that the objective of raising awareness of Local has been successfully achieved as evidenced by a significant change for top of mind awareness which increased from 13% to 36% with the total mentions (overall unprompted awareness) for Local more than doubling from 21% in the 2011 survey to 47% in the 2013 survey, an increase of 26%.

4 hudson howells august 2013 appendix 2 tabulated data & other responses 4 Q2 Top of Mind Awareness 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Council Service Organisation (Lions, Rotary, etc) Charity such as Red Cross or Salvation Army Library (not specified 2011) 2011 Total 2013 Total The following table highlights the positive and negative attributes associated with each level of government by percentage statement association. This table has been sorted by 'Local Council' and also includes the State and Federal brands.

5 hudson howells august 2013 appendix 2 tabulated data & other responses 5 Statement Local Council State Federal Conveniently located offices Expect to be around for a long time Cares about your local community Keeps you informed about what it is doing Provides a voice for your community Cares about environment Has a lot of room for improvement Is clear & concise when it communicates with you Is helpful if you have a problem Excellent customer service Uses fines for revenue raising Appears to waste money Will help you out in an emergency Hasn't changed much over the last 10 years Uses technology to make it easier Has social conscience Seems to manage its business well Could turn to in difficult times Forward thinking Tailors services to your specific needs Treats you as an individual Offers lots of ways to do business Is honest & trustworthy Has a clear idea where it is headed Fixes problems quickly Manages finances well Involves you in its decision making Consistently delivers on its promises Offers good value for money Don't know much about it Hard to deal with Will admit it has made a mistake A much more favourable community perception of Local has been achieved with major improvements (5% or more) in the following areas (note excellent customer service which almost doubled from 33% to 60% agreement): Conveniently located offices - 86% agreement up from 69% Expect to be around for a long time - 83% agreement up from 73% Keeps you informed about what it is doing - 75% agreement up from 70% Cares about environment - 74% agreement up from 63% agreement

6 hudson howells august 2013 appendix 2 tabulated data & other responses 6 Is clear and concise when it communicates with you - 67% agreement up from 50% Is helpful if you have a problem - 60% agreement up from 48% Excellent customer service - 60% agreement up from 33% One area of concern is also noted 'Has a lot of room for improvement - 73% agreement up from 60% agreement'. There are also three statements that are poorly associated with Local although all three statements show a marked improvement over the 2011 survey: Will admit it has made a mistake - 27% agreement up from 15% Offers good value for money - 34% agreement up from 20% Consistently delivers on its promises - 37% agreement up from 21% The following table highlights a series of attitudinal statements related to Local and the extent of agreement by the survey respondents for the 2011 and 2013 surveys. Again this shows a marked increase in positive perceptions of Local.

7 hudson howells august 2013 appendix 2 tabulated data & other responses 7 Attitudes to Council Total Agree 2011 Total Agree 2013 Local Councils are an essential layer of 74% 81% I trust my local Council to do the best for the community 71% 75% My local Council provides vital services every day of the year 69% 75% The jobs that my local Council does are very visible to me 58% 73% My local Council needs more funding from the Federal My local Council needs more funding from the State 64% 67% 61% 67% My local Council is efficient and professional 59% 66% My local Council engages the community on important matters 58% 65% My local Council is well placed to deal with emergencies & natural disasters 49% 54% The rates charged by my local Council are fair 36% 48% My local Council reacts very quickly to all important matters 49% 45% It is therefore concluded that the social advocacy campaign developed and implemented by the LGA has been highly successful.