NOTE: Please send all nominations to Tammy tammy.chan.a@utoronto.ca by June 16, All awards might not be given out each year.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "NOTE: Please send all nominations to Tammy Chan @ tammy.chan.a@utoronto.ca by June 16, 2014. All awards might not be given out each year."

Denis Tobias Newman
8 years ago
Views:

1 LAWRENCE S. BLOOMBERG FACULTY OF NURSING TEACHING AWARDS 2014 NOTE: Please send all nominations to Tammy tammy.chan.a@utonto.ca by June 16, All awards might not be given out each year. Name Criteria Nomination(s) Early Career Teaching Over this academic year, demonstrated consistent outstanding perfmance in teaching. Suppted by peer nomination and course evaluation. suppt including 3 peer signatures, one *Nominee must have an appointment of 4 years less at the Faculty of Nursing and have not Educational Leadership f Teaching that Intellectually Challenges Students previously received this award. Over this academic year, demonstrated excellence in codinating and/ implementing curriculum, courses, projects and/ programs. Suppted by peer nomination and explanation of outstanding accomplishments. Over this academic year, demonstrated teaching that intellectually challenges and stimulates students. suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one Nomination from a student a peer with a letter of suppt including 3 student signature of the

suppt including 3 peer signatures, one *Nominee must have an appointment of 4 years less at the Faculty of Nursing and have not Educational Leadership f Teaching that Intellectually Challenges

2 Name Criteria Nomination(s) Equity & Diversity Over this academic year, demonstrated exceptional sensitivity to equity and diversity that enhanced classroom teaching, curriculum design student experience. suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one Nomination from a student a peer with a letter of suppt including 3 student Betty Burcher Menting Academic Excellence Over this academic year, demonstrated outstanding success in enhancing student faculty development beyond usual activities through menting. F example, consistently available f questions and consultations and collegial engagements in scholarly activities. *Doctal students cannot nominate their superviss supervisy committee members f this award. Over this academic year, made outstanding contributions to teaching and learning that reflects excellence in how to integrate professional practice and scholarship. signature of the suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one Nomination from a student a peer with a letter of suppt including 3 student signature of the suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one Nomination from a student a peer with a letter of suppt including 3 student signature of the

suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one Nomination from a student a peer with a letter of suppt including 3 student Betty Burcher Menting Academic Excellence

3 Name Criteria Nomination(s) Online Teaching Over this academic year, demonstrated excellence in teaching using virtual modalities resulting in high student engagement, innovation, enthusiasm and critical thinking in on-line courses on-line components of courses. suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one Nomination from a student a peer with a letter of suppt including 3 student Teaching Assistant Throughout a course, the Teaching Assistant provided outstanding suppt to students resulting in high student engagement, innovation, enthusiasm and critical thinking. signature of the Nomination from the course profess a student with a letter of suppt including 3 signatures from faculty and/ students, one of which shall be the signature of the Teaching Excellence Graduate Teaching Excellence Over this academic year, demonstrated excellence in teaching as characterised by superlative communication skills, mastery of subject area, ability to stimulate enthusiasm and critical/analytic thinking in students. Over this academic year, demonstrated excellence in teaching as characterised by superlative communication skills, mastery of subject area, ability to stimulate enthusiasm and critical/analytic thinking in students. suppt including 3 student signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one

4 Name Criteria Nomination(s) Entry-Year Clinical Instructing Over this academic year, demonstrated excellence in teaching as characterised by outstanding professionalism and role modeling; exceptional approach to clinical learning that is supptive, fostering critical thinking and problem solving skills. ed to a Clinical Instruct (CI) directly engaged in supervising undergraduate students during a clinical placement in the entry year. suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one Nomination from a student a peer with a letter of suppt including 3 student Seni-Year Clinical Instructing Precepting: Over this academic year, demonstrated excellence in clinical teaching as characterised by outstanding professionalism and role modeling; exceptional approach to clinical learning that is supptive, respectful, creative, enthusiastic, evidence-based and student-centred; and effectiveness in fostering critical thinking and problem solving skills. ed to a Clinical Instruct (CI) directly engaged in supervising undergraduate students during a clinical placement in the seni year. Over this academic year, demonstrated excellence in precepting as characterised by outstanding professionalism and role modeling; exceptional approach to clinical learning that is supptive, fostering critical thinking and problem solving skills. signature of the suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one Nomination from a student a peer with a letter of suppt including 3 student signature of the suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one Nomination from a student a peer with a letter of suppt including 3 student signature of the

ed to a Clinical Instruct (CI) directly engaged in supervising undergraduate students during a clinical placement in the entry year.

5 Name Criteria Nomination(s) Precepting: Graduate Over this academic year, demonstrated excellence in precepting as characterised by outstanding professionalism and role modeling; exceptional approach to clinical learning that is supptive, fostering critical thinking and problem solving skills. suppt including 3 peer signatures, one suppt including 3 student signatures, one Nomination from a student a peer with a letter of suppt including 3 student signature of the

supptive, fostering critical thinking and problem solving skills.

Graduate Program Review Process Summary

Graduate Program Review Process Summary Prepared By: Nathan Risling B.Comm, M.P.A. Coordinator, Graduate Program Review College of Graduate Studies & Research Ph: (306) 966-1606 nathan.risling@usask.ca