Performance Appraisal Instrument Project Summary
|
|
- Jessica Gibson
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Emily Gung page 1 of 12 Performance Appraisal Instrument Project Summary Evaluation of Administrator: Director of the Honors Program at Valdosta State University, Dr. Byron Brown Supervising Evaluators: Dean of Arts & Sciences, Dr. Calendrillo, & the English Department Head, Dr. Mark Smith, Honors Program Administrative Staff, Faculty Senate, VSU students, & Self (360-degree feedback system). Performance Appraisal Forms Used: The main performance appraisal process that is conducted with the Director is a yearly review called the Professional Annual Review (sent out by the Dean of Arts & Sciences & returned for placement in the personnel file by March 31), which includes the following additional evaluations: 1) Evaluation of Director (for the College of Arts & Sciences), 2) Faculty Evaluation (for the Department of English & Faculty Senate), 3) Staff Observations of Program Director (for the Honors Program via the Director of Human Resources), 4) Student-filled Faculty Evaluation (for the specific classes taught in HONS, PERS, & ENGL course offerings). Other evaluations are also used. Please see Appendix 1. Like Faculty, the Director may submit self-evaluations, which will be read & signed by other peer faculty, the Department Head & Dean. Also included are incident-sensitive material such as mediation service forms, which involve the documentation of conflicts between students & faculty & those between or among professional colleagues. Performance Appraisal Methodology: Depending on the Form, VSU utilizes both the Graphic Rating Method (for Faculty Evaluations & Staff Observations) & the Behavior-Focused Rating Method (for Director Evaluations & Student-filled Faculty Evaluations) to describe the aspects of the Director s behaviors or performance. These forms are sometimes in the form of bubbling in Scantrons sheets or marked according to a How-Well-This-Person-Performs scale. The Professional Annual Review is the College of Arts & Sciences formal & structurally st&ard evaluation instrument, but the Honors Program, the English department, & other departments, divisions or committees, develop their own questions, measures, or dimension descriptors for their various evaluations. Please see Appendix 2, 3, & 4. Also used is the Behavior-Focused Critical Incident Form, which identifies Conflict Management concerns. Performance Appraisal Criteria or Dimensions: The usual dimensions are listed below, but are not limited to the foregoing as sole criteria for evaluation. Graphical Rating Form Dimensions Adjustment Capability Productivity Efficiency Potential for Future Development Punctuality Attendance Behavior-Focused Rating Form Dimensions Fiscal / Budget Management Communication Planning & Vision Professional Behavior Supervision & Leadership SWOTs Administrative Change Director Evaluation Rating Categories: The Director is individually rated in each dimension by how: 1) Good their performance is (No Change Needed), 2) Average their performance is (Some Change Needed), 3) Poor their performance is (Great Change Needed), 4) Irrelevant the category is to their performance (No Recommendation), & 5) Unknown the category is by the supervisor (No Recommendation). Purpose of the Evaluations: These Performance Evaluations are used for all employees under the University of Georgia system & primarily helps in administrative decisions to determine qualification for: 1) Promotion, 2)
2 Emily Gung page 2 of 12 Transfer, 3) Demotion, &/or 4) Retention. But, they also indicate the need for faculty development with regard to pre-tenure & post-tenure activities, promotion & merit pay which correlate with the annual evaluation, varying levels of recommendations for changes in the program or department, & collegial feedback. Materials Used in the Evaluation Process: There are several sets of materials used in the evaluation process including: teaching materials (this includes student evaluations & comments), scholarly activities, service activities, an updated curriculum vitae, & other materials which will be forwarded along with the evaluation forms. Please see Appendix 5. Criticism & Questioning of this Evaluation Method & Process: Too simplistic! These forms have not changed since I have been to school here in 1996!! Given the changes that the university has undergone, the measures may be out-dated or irrelevant. So many forms may be potentially time-consuming & take away from the main job duties & educational responsibilities of the director. Leniency Strategy Supervisor Subversion of the system. The Honors Program Director was initially a Philosophy Faculty Member, but has evolved over time into subsequent Directors being specifically English Faculty Members. The Dean who will be evaluating & conducting the Annual Performance Review is also an English Faculty Member. Does this create a writing/literature-intensive bias & focus in the way the Director s Performance is measured as it relates to the idea that the Honors Program is an Interdisciplinary body of knowledge? No room for appeals of the rating! The relative weights of the duties & responsibilities of the Position (as analyzed & detailed in the Job Analysis) are very subjective. No room for analysis -- need results quickly! Also, no training for the evaluators! The dates of the performance review are very time-sensitive & must be followed in an efficiently outlined manner otherwise, the evaluation may be rushed or quickly done which may affect the quality of the evaluation. Mixed purposes feedback vs. administrative. Do these evaluations describe herein describe their performance, behavior, contributions, accomplishments, change & potential entirely & completely? How does one assess a curriculum vitae? By the quality or quantity of work? Negative impact of criticism, especially if mean comments come from students. How manipulated are the records & materials twisted into a positive light relative to the duties outlined in the Job Analysis? Materials & Records may include any papers that have been forthcoming or researched, but may have NOT yet been published! Performance is not controllable. With regard to the special circumstances, such as the Critical Conflict Mediation Incident, how much do they affect one s performance, especially in the event that one s performance is rated more positively? How does one rate other special circumstances such as maternity leave, illness, & tragedy in the family, into the performance evaluation ratings? What if colleagues & the Dean have not been keeping in contact with the person & are not aware of the research agenda & accomplishments of the person in review, because everyone is really too busy? How does one distinguish between mundane or trivial agenda that have been glossed over versus the highlighted achievements? How much does a Student-filled Faculty Evaluation weigh in the scheme or process of things, especially if the Faculty member already has Tenure? How effective are post-tenure evaluation forms as feedback for already tenured professors/directors? Is there an I-don t-really-care attitude posited by well-experienced & matured professors/directors who have been overwhelmed by the many number evaluations he or she has had over the years?
3 Emily Gung page 3 of 12 Performance seems unreliable given the Dynamic Criterion. What if performance reviews vary each year according to who the Dean is or whether or not the Director was motivated that year to do a good job? How does the tradeoff balance itself in the ratings? Is there any leeway in which the departmental goals are interpreted or met specifically? Halo Effect no room for other evaluations with regard to rank, etc. An Example of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for an Honors Program Director: Skills which require good coordination & excellent assistance towards Honors Program students participating in a variety of travel activities & experiences. Task: Chaperoning Honors students on trips / travel to attend Regional, State, & National conferences Well-planned travel arrangements & conference attendance exceeded student s expectations! Planned travel arrangements & conference attendance met student s expectation. Some travel arrangements & conference attendance somewhat met student s expectation. Unclear travel arrangements & a vague underst&ing of conference attendance left the student feeling frustrated & disappointed. Dashed or no travel arrangements at all made the entire trip an utter failure. The Director prepared in advance by distributing & making copies of the conference or trip schedules, itineraries, hotel reservations, & other conference / trip forms, assisted & registered students for either their presentation or attendance to the conference, planned detailed travel arrangements, attended as many conference presentations as possible, including the program s own student s presentations (if any), facilitated in networking with other universities & met other Honors Program faculty & students, went out for out-tings & shows, checked out the local restaurant & loafing scenes, & helped make the 3-4 day trip fun & exciting!! The Director prepared for the trip, but only allowed the students to follow what was planned for the conference. Students are chaperoned by the Director as if the Director was babysitting them. Students are only allowed to go to conference-related events & activities. They end up traveling only according to the strict itinerary of the conference, & then goes back home. The Director just drove the van to the conference, did not plan for any other travel, did not even attend the conference, did not walk around or about, did not explore with the students, did not bring or prepare for any presentations or conference attendance, did not take the students to a restaurant or dining facility to eat, did not take students to a hotel to rest, & wanted to stay in the van & sleep inside the van. The Director inadvertantly lost all of the students on the trip. Preferred and Favorite Performance Appraisal Method: Self-Evaluation Most Effective Performance Appraisal Method for this Position: 360-degree Feedback (Peers, Subordinates, Supervisors, & Self) Treating each situation and purpose (promotion, raise, development, change, etc.) with a separate evaluation. Being consistent with feedback EVERYDAY (not realistic for 360, but feasible for self-eval). Recognizing or checking only for defects and problems in performance. Focusing on criterion-related performance, not personal performance, in order to reduce negative impact from criticism.
4 Emily Gung page 4 of 12 Appendix 1 Source: VSU Human Resource Policy & Procedures SECTION RECRUITMENT & EMPLOYMENT PROCEDURES ( Performance Evaluation A system of performance evaluation has been established for all classified employees of the University & used in determining those employees who are qualified for promotion, transfer, demotion, or retention. The following elements are among those used in the evaluation procedure: adjustment, capability, productivity, efficiency, potential for future development, punctuality & attendance. The supervisor or department head shall not be limited to the foregoing as sole criteria for evaluation. The following describes the nature of performance evaluations currently in use by the University: a. Annual Evaluation An annual performance evaluation is required on every regular employee of the University. The Director of Human Resources will provide the required forms in ample time for the review to be completed & returned for placement in the employee's personnel file by March 31. Employees having been evaluated during the preceding 30 days are not required to have the annual evaluation completed also. b. Special Evaluation A special performance evaluation may be prepared for employees whose overall performance has been determined as unsatisfactory, or who have had specified deficiencies noted in their performance evaluation. Special evaluations should be cleared through the Department Human Resources in advance. The employee should be advised in writing that such evaluation is to be accomplished, the reason for such, the period of time involved, & the potential repercussions should adequate job progress not be made. c. Transfer Evaluation When an employee transfers to another supervisor, it is not necessary to complete a performance evaluation if the employee has been reviewed within a 90-day period prior to the transfer. d. Provisional Status Evaluation Provisional employees must be evaluated at least ten days prior to the completion of their provisional period of employment, or prior to date of termination, whichever occurs first. The provisional status evaluation is the source document in making the determination to grant regular status or to terminate a provisional employee. e. Senior Administrator Evaluation Senior administrative officers of the University, those reporting directly to the President, are to be evaluated at least once every five years by their next level subordinates. This evaluation is meant to provide an open line of communication within an operating area in an effort to enhance area performance & to identify means to better meet or exceed organization expectations.
5 Emily Gung page 5 of 12 Appendix 2 Source: VSU Office of the Vice President & Academic Affairs Faculty Policies & Procedures/Governance Faculty H&book, pg ( EVALUATION OF ADMINISTRATOR Dean/Director For the information to be reported to the administrator & used by the administrator, each faculty member must identify his/her college/division. My college/division is. Mark the appropriate area on the Scantron form for each of the items listed below. 1. On the average, I have contact with this person: a. daily b. weekly c. monthly d. quarterly e. other Listed below are a number of statements which describe aspects of administrator behavior & performance. Rate the individual identified above by marking the appropriate responses on the Scantron form provided. If you are uncertain about a particular item, mark the category labeled "unknown." If you believe an item is not relevant, mark the category labeled "Not Relevant." A.... Unknown/No Recommendation B.... Not Relevant/No Recommendation C.... Performance is Good/No Change Needed D.... Performance is Average/Some Change Needed E.... Performance is Poor/Great Change Needed Fiscal/Budget A B C D E 2. Identifies needs of unit accurately.... _ 3. Establishes budget priorities fairly... _ 4. Allocates resources to reflect needs & priorities.... _ 5. Informs faculty of budget needs & priorities... _ Communication 6. Communicates effectively with faculty.... _ 7. Responds appropriately to faculty input.... _ 8. Informs faculty of budget needs & priorities... _ 9. Informs faculty of policy decisions... _ 10. Communicates faculty concerns to appropriate administrator... _ Planning & Vision 11. Articulates a clear plan for the unit... _ 12. Involves faculty in planning for changes... _
6 Emily Gung page 6 of Consults faculty when implementing plans for change.... _ Professional Behavior 14. Interacts professionally with faculty... _ 15. Interacts professionally with students... _ 16. Demonstrates respect for faculty rights.... _ 17. Conforms to VSU policy of professional conduct... _ Supervision & Leadership 18. Provides effective leadership.... _ 19. Is accessible.... _ 20. Establishes cooperation across the unit... _ 21. Is knowledgeable about activities of the unit... _ 22. Encourages self-governance.... _ 23. Offers equal opportunities to all faculty members... _ 24. My overall rating of this administrator is a. very positive. b. positive. c. negative. d. very negative. 25. Compared with other administrators with whom I work/have worked, this administrator is: a. one of the best. b. above average. c. below average. d. one of the poorest. 26. It is important to me for the administrator to share the results of this evaluation with faculty. a. Yes b. No 27. What would you consider to be the greatest strengths of this administrator? 28. What would you consider to be areas for improvement for this administrator?
7 Emily Gung page 7 of 12 Date of Evaluation: Appendix 3 Source: VSU Office of the Vice President & Academic Affairs Faculty Policies & Procedures/Governance Faculty H&book, pg ( I. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION II. III. IV. College: Department: Name: Highest Degree Earned: Appointment Year: Present Rank: Year First Promotion: Total Years at VSU: TEACHING PERFORMANCE NON-TEACHING PERFORMANCE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT A. Research/Scholarly Activities: B. Professional Activities: FACULTY EVALUATION Year: Appointment Rank: Year Second Promotion: Years in Present Rank: V. ACADEMIC HONORS, ACHIEVEMENTS, & RECOGNITIONS VI. VII. VIII. ADVISING OTHER SUMMARY EVALUATION Signature of Evaluator Date I certify that I have read this evaluation Signature of Person Evaluated Date FACULTY EVALUATION INSTRUCTIONS I. Complete the biographical data. II. Teaching Performance:
8 Emily Gung page 8 of 12 II. IV. Provide the number of courses taught, the enrollment, the number of new preparations. Include a brief statement of faculty member's teaching performances based on data on student evaluations, peer evaluations, & department head evaluations. Non-Teaching Services: Provide a brief statement that describes the level of activity in terms of committee memberships at the departmental, school & university level; other non-teaching institutional activities or services, & nonteaching services outside the institution that are indicative of the applied aspects of one's discipline, training, or expertise. Professional Development: A. Research & Scholarly Activities Summarize research & scholarly activities in terms of publications (refereed journals, books, manuals, case studies, proceedings, etc.); submitted but not yet published articles, books, etc.; papers presented at professional meetings; publications in preparation (books, articles, papers for presentation); research in progress; consulting, reviewing, & editing services; & other scholarly activities not described herein. B: Professional Activities Provide a summary statement of memberships, attendance, official posts held, & awards/recognitions. V. Academic Honors, Achievements & Recognitions: VI. VII. Advising: Other: VIII. Summary Evaluation: Provide a summary of honors, achievements, & recognitions (department, University System, & external agencies & organizations not included in other parts of the evaluation). Provide a summary statement on the faculty member's advising load & an evaluation of his/her performance as an adviser. Emphasize any activities that go beyond assistance in scheduling of classes or completing the registration process. Provide a summary statement on any activities or attributes not included in other parts of the evaluation instrument. Provide a qualitative statement summarizing the performance of the faculty member. The statement must include areas of strength, areas for improvement, & suggested development activities which address the areas for improvement, especially designed to meet promotion & tenure criteria. NOTE: The time period for the evaluation should encompass the previous Winter, Spring, Summer, & Fall quarters for returning faculty. The preceding Summer & Fall quarters may be used to evaluate new faculty.
9 Emily Gung page 9 of 12 Appendix 4 HONS & PERS Course Evaluation Form
10 Emily Gung page 10 of 12
11 Emily Gung page 11 of 12 Appendix 5 Stages in Evaluation
12 Emily Gung page 12 of 12
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures ANNUAL FACULTY APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 2-0112 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 POLICY 1.01 A review of faculty activities and accomplishments for
More informationUniversity Of Alaska Anchorage College Of Health Department Of Human Services. Criteria and Guidelines For Faculty Evaluation
University Of Alaska Anchorage College Of Health Department Of Human Services Criteria and Guidelines For Faculty Evaluation This document is to be used in conjunction with the UNAC and UAFT Collective
More informationHoward College of Arts & Science Faculty Assembly Governance Document 1
Howard College of Arts & Science Faculty Assembly Governance Document 1 (Submitted to and approved by the Board of Trustees on Sept. 7, 2001) GOVERNANCE OF THE FACULTY ASSEMBLY OF THE HOWARD COLLEGE OF
More informationThe School of Education & Human Services The University of Michigan Flint Standards and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure
The School of Education & Human Services The University of Michigan Flint Standards and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure Introduction The primary mission of the University of Michigan Flint is to be the
More informationDEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)
Approved by Academic Affairs May 2010 DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP) I. DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING RTP POLICY A. Preamble B.
More informationM. CRITERIA FOR FACULTY EVALUATION
faculty evaluation/1 M. CRITERIA FOR FACULTY EVALUATION 1. General Criteria: The professional lives of college faculty members traditionally have been characterized by expectations in the broad categories
More information100 Graduate Faculty Handbook
100 Graduate Faculty Handbook 101 Introduction Graduate education is an integral component of Armstrong Atlantic State University (herein Armstrong). Armstrong s graduate programs provide graduate education
More informationSCHOOL OF NURSING FACULTY EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR RETENTION, PROMOTION, TENURE, AND PERIODIC REVIEW
SCHOOL OF NURSING FACULTY EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR RETENTION, PROMOTION, TENURE, AND PERIODIC REVIEW This document is to be used in conjunction with the UA Board of Regents policies, University
More informationSociology Department Faculty Expectations Handbook For Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure
Sociology Department Faculty Expectations Handbook For Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure Department of Sociology Fayetteville State University Version Monday, January 8, 2009 1 DEPARTMENT
More informationPERSONNEL DOCUMENT. DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING University of Arkansas
PERSONNEL DOCUMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING University of Arkansas Passed by faculty vote: September 13, 2011 PERSONNEL DOCUMENT Evaluative Criteria, Procedures, and General
More informationELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY Graduate Faculty Policy
Page 1 of 6 ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY Graduate Faculty Policy Preamble This policy shall govern graduate faculty membership at Elizabeth City State University (ECSU). The provisions of this policy
More informationUNIVERSITY OF UTAH COLLEGE OF NURSING Faculty Appointment, Retention, Promotion and Tenure POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH COLLEGE OF NURSING Faculty Appointment, Retention, Promotion and Tenure POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Editorial Revision May 1998 Editorial Revision January 1999 Editorial Revision April 2002
More informationSan Jose/Evergreen Community College District Administrator Performance Appraisal Forms
San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Administrator Performance Appraisal Forms Philosophy and Policy In accordance with Education Code Section 87663, the policy on evaluation of administrators
More informationCOLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION GUIDELINES
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION GUIDELINES Preamble The College of Business and Technology (CBT) faculty believe that a fair and systematic performance evaluation system is a
More informationUniversity of Georgia Bylaws of the College of Public Health
University of Georgia Bylaws of the College of Public Health ARTICLE 1. The Faculty of the College of Public Health Section 1. The Faculty The Faculty of the College of Public Health (CPH) shall consist
More informationIndiana University Kokomo. Student Nurses Association
Indiana University Kokomo Student Nurses Association IUKSNA By-Laws Kokomo, IN November 2010 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Reason for Being... 3 Rights and Responsibilities... 3 Purpose of IUKSNA... 4 Functions
More informationDHS Policy & Procedure for Promotion of Clinical Faculty
DHS Policy & Procedure for I. Introduction A. These standards and evaluation criteria are used to operationally define the qualifications expected for appointment or promotion of clinical faculty in the
More informationDepartment of Fashion and Interior Design. Policy on Merit Ratings. Accepted October 21, 2009
Department of Fashion and Interior Design Policy on Merit Ratings Accepted October 21, 2009 Full-time faculty are expected to participate in the activities of Teaching, Scholarly Activity, and Service.
More informationPUBLIC AND COMMUNITY SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING FACULTY
NEW FACULTY APPOINTMENTS {approved by unanimous vote on 11/14/2008} In its appointment of tenure-track [Ordinary] faculty, the Department of Public and Community Service Studies is committed to the maintenance
More informationCOLLEGE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES School of Nursing. Guidelines for Promotion, Tenure and Reappointment (Effective May, 2007)
COLLEGE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES School of Nursing Guidelines for Promotion, Tenure and Reappointment (Effective May, 2007) Attached are the documents related to the role and responsibilities of the
More informationCollege of Engineering Faculty Appraisal System. For 2011/2012
College of Engineering Faculty Appraisal System For 2011/2012 Revised September 2011 1. Introduction We believe in the premise that people are more productive when they agree on what is expected of them
More informationTHE NEED OF 720 DEGREE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN THE NEW ECONOMY COMPANIES
39 THE NEED OF 720 DEGREE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN THE NEW ECONOMY COMPANIES ABSTRACT ANUPAMA*; MARY BINU T.D.**; DR. TAPAL DULABABU*** *Asst. Professor, The Oxford College of Business Management, No.32,
More informationCollege of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University PROMOTION AND TENURE MANUAL
College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University PROMOTION AND TENURE MANUAL Policy Title: Version: 21 College Promotion and Tenure Manual College Approval: Promotion and Tenure Review Board, 01/26/2016
More informationThe Sport Management Internship Handbook
The Sport Management Internship Handbook Dowling College Discipline of Sport Management and Physical Education Oakdale, New York (631) 244-5022 / 244-3289 CONTENTS page I. Introduction 1 II. Things To
More informationRutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Nursing Legacy CON Faculty
1 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Nursing Legacy CON Faculty Appointment, Reappointment, and Promotion of Clinical Track Faculty (Policy 60.5.10) Individuals whose status is qualified
More informationPerformance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 11, November 2013 1 Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal
More information20. APPOINTMENT OF GRADUATE FACULTY AND THESIS AND DISSERTATION CHAIRS
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS POLICY STATEMENT as approved October 26, 1996, and subsequently amended 11/21/2010 and resubmitted for approval on 4/20/2012. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DEFINITIONS 2. RULES 3. DEPARTMENT
More informationDepartment of Art and Design Governance Document Approved 4-9-2003
Department of Art and Design Governance Document Approved 4-9-2003 I. Preamble The Faculty of the Department of Art and Design subscribes to the principles of shared governance, as elaborated by the Faculty
More informationENTERPRISE EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & PLANNING EVALUATION
ENTERPRISE EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGENT & PLANNING EVALUATION INSTRUCTIONS (PLEASE READ): This Performance Evaluation is meant to promote individual and organizational effectiveness and to encourage
More informationEngineering Technology Department Bylaws 2011
Engineering Technology Department Bylaws 2011 ARTICLE l. DEPARTMENTAL MEMBERSHIP 1.1 Membership in the Engineering Technology Department consists of all persons holding academic rank in the department.
More informationUniversity of Louisville. School of Nursing Bylaws
University of Louisville School of Nursing Bylaws Approved by Faculty Organization 3.21.2014 Reviewed by LS 8/9/15; MH, SR, 8/13/15 Approved by U of L Board of Trustees 9/3/15 School of Nursing Bylaws:
More informationStandards for Promotion and Tenure Required by Section 7.12, Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure. Department of Psychology College of Liberal Arts
Standards for Promotion and Tenure Required by Section 7.12, Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure Department of Psychology College of Liberal Arts Approved by the Faculty of the Department of Psychology on
More informationDEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENTAL PROCEDURES, CRITERIA, AND BYLAWS Approved 2/98
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENTAL PROCEDURES, CRITERIA, AND BYLAWS Approved 2/98 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction... 2 II. III. IV. The Chairperson...2 Chairperson
More informationAPPENDIX 27A PERIODIC EVALUATION OF PROBATIONARY AND TENURED FACULTY California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
APPENDIX 27A PERIODIC EVALUATION OF PROBATIONARY AND TENURED FACULTY California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Directions to Faculty Member: Please complete pages 3 through 6, appending additional
More informationUniversity of Delaware College of Health Sciences Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition
University of Delaware College of Health Sciences Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION, TENURE AND REVIEW I. INTRODUCTION The mission of the Department of Behavioral Health
More informationDEPARTMENT PLAN. The Department of Counseling, Educational, and Developmental Psychology. College of Education and Human Development
10/23/03 DEPARTMENT PLAN The Department of Counseling, Educational, and Developmental Psychology College of Education and Human Development Eastern Washington University Cheney ω Spokane Washington Formally
More informationDepartment of Business, Management and Accounting
Department of Business, Management and Accounting Departmental Promotion and Tenure Criteria March 22, 2006 I. Introduction The quality of programs offered in the Department of Business, Management and
More informationAPPLIED SOCIOLOGY, CLINICAL SOCIOLOGY, PUBLIC SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGICAL PRACTICE PROGRAMS AT THE DOCTORAL LEVEL STANDARDS
APPLIED SOCIOLOGY, CLINICAL SOCIOLOGY, PUBLIC SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGICAL PRACTICE PROGRAMS AT THE DOCTORAL LEVEL STANDARDS Box Q University of Tampa 401 West Kennedy Boulevard Tampa Florida 33606-1490
More informationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH College of Business Administration
1 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH College of Business Administration CONSTITUTION OF THE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (Adopted: September 2000 Last Amended: Spring 2015) Preamble We, the
More informationUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. MU Sinclair School of Nursing. GUIDELINES for APPOINTMENT, REAPPOINTMENT, and PROMOTION of NON-REGULAR FACULTY
1 University of Missouri-Columbia MU Sinclair School of Nursing GUIDELINES for APPOINTMENT, REAPPOINTMENT, and PROMOTION of NON-REGULAR FACULTY The MU Sinclair School of Nursing (SSON) faculty established
More informationCOLLEGE OF ARTS AND LETTERS ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND LETTERS ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES A. General Structure 1.0 Administration, Departments, Programs 1.1 The College shall be administered by the Dean, who shall be assisted by an Associate
More informationOUTLINE of CONTENTS. Introduction. Professional Development Policy. Part 2 Performance Review and Planning Procedures. Part 3 Salary Increment Policy
PACIFIC ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND PLANNING POLICY OUTLINE of CONTENTS Introduction Part I Professional Development Policy Part 2 Performance Review and Planning
More informationCollege of Business Faculty Charter. Code of Operating Standards for Academic Policy and Administrative Structure
College of Business Faculty Charter Code of Operating Standards for Academic Policy and Administrative Structure I. PURPOSES A. To formally identify organizational structure and procedures for faculty
More informationPart III. Self-Study Report Template
Part 3 Ministry Of Education And Higher Education Directorate General of Higher Education Part III Self-Study Report Template LABE SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE http://www.labe.org.lb General Instructions Introduction
More informationCollege of Medicine Promotion and Tenure Procedure FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
College of Medicine Promotion and Tenure Procedure FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY Approved by majority vote of College Faculty March 25, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Governance... 1 a. Membership...
More informationSupervisor s Performance Management Guide
Supervisor s Performance Management Guide 1. Introduction... 2 2. Duties and Job Descriptions... 2 3. Supervisor s Role... 2 4. Goals & Employee Development... 3 5. Annual Performance Evaluation Process...
More informationOFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CODE OF PRACTICE REGARDING INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TITLES: TITLE DESCRIPTIONS AND MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CODE OF PRACTICE REGARDING INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TITLES: TITLE DESCRIPTIONS AND MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS PREAMBLE INDEX I. ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS 1. SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
More informationAACSB Self Evaluation Report Documentation. Supporting Materials and Timeline
AACSB Self Evaluation Report Documentation Supporting Materials and Timeline The Self Evaluation Report is a critical document in achieving initial accreditation. Ours is due May 15, 2012. To reach this
More informationBYLAWS FOR THE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MANAGEMENT APPENDIX B
BYLAWS FOR THE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MANAGEMENT APPENDIX B INSTRUMENTS FOR FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Procedures are detailed
More informationUMD Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
UMD Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Indices and Standards for Tenure and Promotion to Professor as Required by Section 7.12 of the Board of Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure (June 10,
More informationI. Preamble... 2. II. Weighting of Promotion and Tenure Criteria... 2. III. Appointment Criteria for Tripartite Faculty... 3. Assistant Professor...
1 Promotion, Tenure and Faculty Standards: Instructional Design Department Table of Contents I. Preamble... 2 II. Weighting of Promotion and Tenure Criteria... 2 III. Appointment Criteria for Tripartite
More informationThe University of West Florida. Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice. Bylaws
The University of West Florida Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice Bylaws 1. Mission The mission of the Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice is to challenge and inspire students to be
More informationPerformance Appraisal
PURPOSE Performance Appraisal 90-day Evaluation 180-day Evaluation Annual Evaluation The purpose of any performance appraisal program is employee development. The value of performance appraisal is in the
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY. Texas Southern University
GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY Texas Southern University The Purposes of Graduate Program Review Graduate program review at Texas Southern University exists to ensure that programs are functioning at the
More informationFaculty Rank and Tenure Plan
Faculty Rank and Tenure Plan 1. Purpose 2. Policy General Procedures 3. Definition of Terms 4. Administration Procedures for Rank 5. Minimum Rank Requirements (including Ranking Table) 6. Assignment of
More informationWashkewicz College of Engineering Requirements and Procedures for Tenure & Promotion
1. INTRODUCTION Washkewicz College of Engineering Requirements and Procedures for Tenure & Promotion This document governs promotions in the Washkewicz College of Engineering (WCE) from Assistant Professor
More informationPERFORMANCE APPRAISAL College of Business
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL College of Business INSTRUCTION (includes student advising) A faculty member s annual instruction performance evaluation is linked to his/her level of activity in course management,
More informationOffice of thy Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs. DAC Revision Approval; Department of Psychology
Office of thy Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs To: l~ary Anne Hanner, Dean, College of Sciences Date: December 4,2008 Subject: DAC Revision Approval; Department of Psychology Thank you for
More informationGeorgia Regents University. College of Nursing. Guidelines and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure
1 Georgia Regents University College of Nursing Guidelines and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure Approved by CON Faculty Senate: May 30, 2013 Approved by CON Dean: May 31, 2013 Drafted February 2013 Revised
More informationBY- LAWS OF THE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, TEACHING & HEALTH
BY- LAWS OF THE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, TEACHING & HEALTH Article I. General Membership... 3 Section 1.01 Section 1.03 Section 1.04 Section 1.05 Voting members of the Education, Teaching & Health Council
More informationSalt Lake Community College ASSOCIATE DEAN (AD) MODEL PROCEDURES
PURPOSE: Salt Lake Community College values and endorses strong and effective academic leadership, and first tier academic leadership, Associate Deans (ADs), are the foundation for strong and effective
More informationHow To Work For A College Of Technology
Internship Employer Guidelines Pennsylvania College of Technology One College Avenue Williamsport, PA 17701 570-327 4517 An affiliate of The Pennsylvania State University Penn College operates on a nondiscriminatory
More informationCOMPARISON OF CLINICIAN TEACHER AND SALARIED CLINICAL FACULTY PATHWAYS, PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES 9/22/14
COMPARISON OF CLINICIAN TEACHER AND SALARIED CLINICAL FACULTY PATHWAYS, PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES 9/22/14 Clinician Teacher Primary responsibilities Clinical care Teaching and/or supervision Scholarship
More informationSchool of Social Work Stephen F. Austin State University
School of Social Work Stephen F. Austin State University Policy Revisions: Policy and Procedure for Awarding Promotion, Tenure, and Merit This policy and procedure for awarding promotion, tenure, and merit
More informationTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL Purpose: To consider all matters relating to graduate programs at Tarleton State University and to recommend practices and procedures
More informationDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Promotion and Tenure Guidelines
02 02 10 DRAFT 1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Promotion and Tenure Guidelines For all general information on Promotion and Tenure, refer to the School of Medicine s Office of Faculty
More informationAcademic Program Review
Academic Program Review UCSF Graduate Council and Graduate Division May 2014 Table of Contents ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW: AN OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS... 2 ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW: PREPARING THE SELF- STUDY...
More informationLink to University's Strategic Plan (Strategy #) Goal 1.1 Strategy 1.1.1
Mission Statement: The mission of the College of Engineering is to provide an innovative academic program of excellence at both the undergraduate and graduate levels, judged by the highest standards in
More informationRadford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM
Radford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING ADMISSION/READMISSION, FIELD PLACEMENT, RETENTION, and PROGRAM COMPLETION Students have a professional obligation to abide
More informationDepartment of Applied Arts and Sciences. University of Montana- Missoula College of Technology
1 01/19/2010 Department of Applied Arts and Sciences University of Montana- Missoula College of Technology Unit Standards and Procedures for Faculty Evaluation and Advancement Instructions These unit standards
More informationPratt Institute Academic Initiative Proposal Guidelines
Office of the Provost Approved 8/23/2006 Pratt Institute Academic Initiative Proposal Guidelines Office of the Provost Approved 8/23/2006 Introduction This document describes the procedures for submission
More informationSON CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR: ASSOCIATE DEAN/DIRECTOR SCHOOL OF NURSING
School of Nursing Bylaws PREAMBLE: The faculty of Northern Michigan University School of Nursing establishes these Bylaws as provided in the agreement between the Board of Trustees of Northern Michigan
More informationDepartment of Nursing. Criteria for Nursing Faculty Promotion
Department of Nursing Criteria for Nursing Faculty Promotion The promotion of a faculty member is determined by merit. Teaching, creative scholarship and professional qualifications, and professional service
More informationPerformance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon
Performance Management Handbook City of American Canyon 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background on performance management City Core competencies Performance management model Development of the Core
More informationFlorida Gulf Coast University Sabbatical Guidelines Approved November 18, 2011
1 Florida Gulf Coast University Sabbatical Guidelines Approved November 18, 2011 Overview: Sabbatical leave awards are an important component of faculty development and institutional excellence. Through
More informationGUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE PROVOST UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15260 JULY, 2002 Guidelines for Conducting Evaluations of Academic Programs
More informationTenure and Promotion Criteria and Procedures Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208
Tenure and Promotion Criteria and Procedures Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 UCTP Approval: February 20, 2002 Recommendations of the tenured
More informationBY-LAWS OF THE EDWARD J. BLOUSTEIN SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND PUBLIC POLICY. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
1 By-Laws BY-LAWS OF THE EDWARD J. BLOUSTEIN SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND PUBLIC POLICY Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Article I. PREAMBLE These by-laws, prepared and adopted by the faculty of the
More informationASSOCIATE DEAN OF NURSING, BYRDINE F. LEWIS CHAIR (Salary Range $130,000 to $160,000)
ASSOCIATE DEAN OF NURSING, BYRDINE F. LEWIS CHAIR (Salary Range $130,000 to $160,000) Job Description: The Associate Dean is the program administrator of the School of Nursing appointed by the Dean of
More informationDepartment of Marketing / College of Business Florida State University BYLAWS. Approved by a majority of faculty
Department of Marketing / College of Business Florida State University BYLAWS Approved by a majority of faculty Initially adopted December 4, 2006 Amended February 17, 2009 Amended November 23, 2010 Amended
More informationSCHOOL OF ACCOUNTANCY FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES (approved 9-18-07)
SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTANCY FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES (approved 9-18-07) The School of Accountancy (SOA) is one of six academic units within the College of Business Administration (COBA) at Missouri State
More informationCONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA PREAMBLE
CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA This Constitution is intended to be consistent with Florida law, the University Constitution and the regulations of the University of Florida Board
More informationBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF COMMUNITY-TECHNICAL COLLEGES AFT BARGAINING UNIT APPLICATION FOR PROMOTION TEACHING FACULTY Academic Year 2012-2013
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF COMMUNITY-TECHNICAL COLLEGES AFT BARGAINING UNIT APPLICATION FOR PROMOTION TEACHING FACULTY Academic Year 2012-2013 This application must be submitted to the President no later than
More informationSELF-STUDY FORMAT FOR REVIEW OF EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAMS
SELF-STUDY FORMAT FOR REVIEW OF EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAMS Although programs engage in continual self-assessment and review of their work, periodic program reviews are designed to provide a broader view
More informationPROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY AND DEPARTMENTS The Graduate School of NMSU 575 646-5745 Revised on March 19, 2013
PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY AND DEPARTMENTS The Graduate School of NMSU 575 646-5745 Revised on March 19, 2013 Guidelines are provided on developing proposals for the following: Guidelines on
More informationPOLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT MERIT PROCESS Approved April 2011
POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT MERIT PROCESS Approved April 2011 All faculty members, with the exception of the department chair, are each placed into one of four categories: Unsatisfactory Satisfactory
More informationPrevious Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3, 2011, May 7, 2013
RYERSON UNIVERSITY POLICY OF SENATE PERIODIC PROGRAM REVIEW OF GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS Policy Number 126 Previous Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3,
More informationBYLAWS OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY ARTICLE I. Name
BYLAWS OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY ARTICLE I Name The name of this organization shall be the Graduate School, Emporia State University. ARTICLE II Purpose The purpose of these bylaws
More informationBYLAWS OF THE FACULTY College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University
BYLAWS OF THE FACULTY College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ARTICLE I. PURPOSES Section 1.
More informationStandards and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure. School of Social Work and Human Service Social Work Department
Standards and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure School of Social Work and Human Social Work Department TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Preamble... 4 II. Weighting Criteria... 4 III. Appointment Criteria for
More informationA. Criteria for Faculty Membership in the Graduate Program
I. Objective Communication Graduate Program Bylaws Administrative Home: UCD Department of Communication Revision date: 8-21-2007 Graduate Council approval date: November 14, 2007 The Graduate Program in
More informationAcademic Program Review Handbook
Handbook Continuously Improving Programs and Student Learning Revised July 2014 Original Issue: December 6, 2010 Approved: Derry Connolly, President Current Issue: July 3, 2014 Effective: July 3, 2014
More informationFOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
APPENDIX C FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Philosophy and Policy The performance of all Foothill-De Anza Community College District administrators
More informationUniversity Policy Statement UPS 210.001 RECRUITMENT AND APPOINTMENT OF TENURE-TRACK FACULTY
University Policy Statement UPS 210.001 RECRUITMENT AND APPOINTMENT OF TENURE-TRACK FACULTY I. INTRODUCTION The goal for recruitments is to appoint a high quality and diverse faculty utilizing an effective,
More informationF. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM GENERAL POLICY It is the policy of Scott County to regularly evaluate the work performance of its employees and provide them with relevant feedback to enable
More informationTemplate for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic)
Template for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic) Standard One: Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness
More information8 APPRAISING AND IMPROVING PERFORMANCE
CHAPTER 8 8 APPRAISING AND IMPROVING PERFORMANCE A major function of human resources management is the appraisal and improvement of employee performance. In establishing a performance appraisal program,
More informationAnnual Activity Report
Annual Activity Report Instructions: This report should address only activities that occur in the academic year for which the report is prepared, with the exception of your curriculum vita. Your Annual
More information2. CRITERIA FOR APPOINTMENT, REAPPOINTMENT, AND PROMOTION OF FULL-TIME FACULTY MEMBERS, UCSDM
Requirements for Fulltime Tenure Track Faculty Requirements for Fulltime Clinical Track Faculty Requirements for Part-time Faculty, Volunteer Faculty and Preceptors Requirements for Emeritus Appendix A:
More informationCommendable (C): Rating for faculty whose performance clearly and consistently exceeds requirements in principal professional responsibilities.
DEPARTMENT CHAIR S ANNUAL EVALUATION OF FACULTY PERFORMANCE J. WHITNEY BUNTING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS Faculty Member Name: Calendar Year: Department Chair Name: This evaluation is to be completed by the department
More information