Basis of Print Volume Count: Physical or Bibliographic. Number of Electronic Books (included in question 2)

Transcription

1 COLLECTIONS (#) Number of Titles held June 30, 2013 (all formats) Number of Volumes held June 30, 2013 (print plus electronic) Basis of Print Volume Count: Physical or Bibliographic Number of Electronic Books (included in question 2) Are the below figures reported in Canadian dollars: Yes or No? Total Library Expenditures (exclude fringe benefits) (7+8+9) Total Library Materials Expenditures (7a+7b+7c) One-time Resources Purchases (7a) 394, Bibliographic No , Bibliographic No ,938, Physical No 3,173,696 1,054, , , ,751 Bibliographic 177,640 No $3,594,791 $686,985 $144, ,631 1,068,587 Physical 116,926 No $4,071,665 $1,067,086 $295,877 1,230,135 1,165,967 Physical 198,284 No $6,097,692 $1,673,698 $283,337 1,019,961 1,354,740 Bibliographic 36,958 No $5,655,634 $2,011,929 $241, , ,168 Bib/Phy 98,957 No $2,551,231 $671,938 $73,933 1,171,891 2,610,485 Bibliographic 369,756 No $5,544,447 $1,972,959 $160,116 1,153,212 1,052,689 Physical 151,285 No $4,329,613 $1,612,676 $303,894 38, ,437 Bibliographic 120,342 No $652,023 $126,233 $39, ,844 n/a Bibliographic 17,157 No $1,440,229 $272,728 $70,280 1,344,864 2,069,863 Bibliographic 425,484 No $9,888,880 $3,017,999 $1,018, , ,565 Bibliographic 36,559 No $4,138,075 $1,386,144 $245,800 1,237,656 1,482,335 Bibliographic 111,100 No $4,411,314 $1,555,501 $402,953 1,012, ,844 Bibliographic 180,028 No $2,478,399 $869,874 $432,187 6,616,686 2,241,654 Bibliographic 216,926 No $9,475,313 $3,205,172 $598,626 (IVC) 52,154 52,154 Bibliographic 0 No $62,000 $62,000 $0 2,451,483 1,470,996 Bibliographic 226,691 No $8,999,444 $2,652,701 $444, , ,216 Bibliographic 32,867 No $5,078,957 $1,578,590 $249, , ,991 Bibliographic 213,974 No $3,754,983 $711,863 $57, , ,247 Bibliographic 131,000 No $3,086,825 $698,911 $114, , ,257 Physical 7,819 No $1,934,670 $546,065 $63,371 26,783, ,294,183 3,171,953 No $94,637,696 $28,089,543 $5,485,417

2 EPENDITURES ($) (IVC) Ongoing Resources Purchases (e.g., subscriptions, annual license fees) Collection Support Total Salaries and Wages (8a+8b+8c) (Exclude fringe benefits/report fringe on Line 10) Professional Staff (exclude fringe benefits) Support Staff (exclude fringe benefit) Students Assistants (exclude fringe benefit) Other Operating Expenditures (7b) (7c) 8 (8a) (8b) (8c) ,500 23,362 1,845, , , , ,116 $507,641 $34,515 $1,880,320 $1,012,356 $757,321 $110,643 $1,027,486 $765,135 $6,074 $1,939,601 $933,977 $755,665 $249,959 $1,064,978 $1,388,367 $1,994 $3,786,416 $1,538,347 $1,779,993 $475,586 $637,578 $1,658,294 $112,525 $3,291,158 $1,670,858 $1,380,953 $239,347 $352,548 $598,005 Unk $1,634,724 $690,893 $854,082 $89,749 $244,569 $1,161,322 $651,521 $3,571,488 $1,726,114 $1,563,966 $281,408 $956,962 $351,819 $2,641,029 $1,512,200 $925,194 $203,635 $75,908 $75,914 $10,351 $329,204 $196,368 $113,673 $19,163 $29,757 $165,590 $36,858 $1,097,318 $675,762 $326,328 $25,045 $70,183 $1,999,285 $0 $5,851,612 $2,319,671 $2,552,231 $929,710 $1,019,269 $1,049,309 $91,035 $2,549,702 $1,024,622 $1,346,321 $178,759 $202,229 $1,141,593 $10,995 $3,794,474 $2,059,605 $1,369,185 $365,685 $616,840 $428,292 $9,395 $1,364,019 $138,000 $1,024,129 $201,890 $244,506 $1,944,293 $662,253 $5,098,227 $2,173,306 $2,364,350 $560,571 $1,171,914 $0 $0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $1,903,617 $304,929 $5,192,889 $2,578,260 $2,234,619 $380,010 $1,153,854 $1,311,664 $17,646 $2,856,010 $993,659 $1,547,730 $314,621 $644,357 $648,692 $5,485 $2,185,357 $959,196 $1,059,225 $166,937 $857,763 $471,585 $112,866 $2,272,914 $994,250 $1,002,710 $160,954 $115,000 $476,386 $6,308 $1,191,523 $496,732 $640,546 $54,245 $197,082 $20,032,647 $2,509,516 $56,990,178 $25,985,796 $25,450,454 $5,370,082 $10,946,649

3 FRINGE BENEFITS EPENDITURES FROM ETERNAL SOURCES PERSONNEL (IVC) FRINGE BENEFITS (Provide a detailed footnote on what this includes) Fringe Benefits ($) Official Designated percent (%) Consortia/Networks/ Bibliographic Utilities Expenditures from External Sources) Total Staff FTE (13a+13b+13c) Professional Staff, FTE Support Staff, FTE Student Assistants, FTE Number of Library Presentations to Groups (13a) (13b) (13c) % $162, % $111, % $208, $742,120 34% $177, UNK UNK $200, $0 0% $230, $1,544,733 36% $266, $545,762 n/a $171, $0 0% $289, $1,065,240 $247, $166,828 n/a $98, n/a n/a $129, $2,192,650 41% $ $1,197,493 47% $230, n/a n/a $254, $402,825 $217, $2,111,910 45% $288, n/a n/a n/a $257,016 $2,187,515 42% $279, $1,221,864 n/a $234, n/a n/a $175, $0 0% $167, $599,567 38% $156, $13,236,387 4,553, , ,521

4 INSTRUCTION REFERENCE CIRCULATION (IVC) Is the Library Presentations Figure based on Sampling: Yes or No? Number of Total Is the Total Participants in Group Participants in Group Presentations Figure based on Presentations reported in Sampling: Yes or No? Line 14 Number of reference transactions Is the reference transactions figure based on sampling: Yes or No? Number of initial circulations (excluding reserves) (14a) 15 (15a) 16 (16a) 17 No 5,472 No 16,764 Yes 18,617 No 2,887 No n/a n/a 38,888 No 3,651 No 32,500 No 48,369 No 2,907 No 16,950 Yes 10,622 No 3,711 No 12,014 No 33,858 Yes 6,550 Yes 11,102 No 229,428 No 17,550 No 8,405 No 75,631 No 7,985 No 620 Yes 57,238 No 11,323 No 30,043 No 132,150 No 21,348 No 2,032 Yes 78,141 No 4,380 No 2,720 Yes 5,758 No 1,653 No 2,455 No 28,607 No 29,281 No 24,198 No 87,488 No 3,261 No 94,296 No 46,407 No 10,750 No 15,400 Yes 124,664 No 4,655 No 9,308 No 71,693 No 11,745 No 42,811 No 124,843 No 100 No 75 No n/a No 31,328 No 52,050 Yes 109,122 No 13,780 No 1,273 No 44,000 No 11,176 No 13,231 No 23,704 No 8,355 No 56, ,954 No 4,454 No 4,676 No 50, , ,031 1,628,016

5 (IVC) Number of successful full-text article requests (journals) USE OF ELECTRONIC RESOURCES (following COUNTER definitions) (#) Number of Number of regular federated searches (databases) searches (databases) INTERLIBRARY LOANS (#) DOCTOR'S DEGREES AND FACULTY (#) Total number of filled requests PROVIDED TO other libraries Total number of filled requests RECEIVED FROM other library or providers Number of Doctor's Degrees awarded in FY Number of fields in which Doctor's Degrees can be awarded Number of fulltime instructional faculty in FY ,571 2,808,446 UNK 6,018 4, , ,369 n/a 1,398 3, ,926 11,691, ,204 7,229 7, ,218 1,542,340 2,710 5,102 n/a n/a , ,549 14,799 9,953 11, ,882 1,014,080 1,420 16,965 10, ,426,937 2,943,891 38,623,890 21,082 27, , ,537 n/a 4,251 7,684 n/a n/a 265 n/a n/a n/a 39,071 72, ,070 5,356,951 3,775 7, ,285 47, n/a n/a 2 253, ,504 50,463 1,320 3, ,961,450 7,745,072 1,744,012 10,877 8, ,166 1,021, ,935 21,830 12, ,302, , ,557 17,760 7, ,314 1,887, , ,384 5,208,503 60,260 22,943 20, n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,386,732 9,973,090 17,695,204 23,823 18, ,352,892 3,597,887 94,898 16,759 25, , , ,601 8, , , ,948 8, , ,455 69,506 4,974 4, ,897,337 54,447,158 65,722, , , ,922

6 ENROLLMENT - FALL 2012 (#) (IVC) Full-time students, undergraduate and graduate Part-time students, undergraduate and graduate Full-time graduate students Part-time graduate students ,409 1, ,400 n/a 200 n/a 15,257 1,213 1,183 9,610 4,497 1,048 1,199 11,168 2,683 1,193 1,208 17,150 2, ,380 27,362 10,315 1,290 4,059 7, ,460 7,126 2,068 2,064 16,847 4,908 1,856 1, , ,181 6,983 1,897 2,000 18,429 3, ,022 28,539 6,140 2,998 1,224 26,260 5,337 2,787 2,186 n/a n/a n/a n/a 23,420 7,028 3,100 2,191 18, ,131 2, ,614 1, ,038 1, ,285 71,678 24,483 22,622

7 TRENDS Channel Islands Dominguez Hills 1 Are you aware of the 2011 revision of the ACRL Standards for Libraries: Yes or No? Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No If you are aware of these Standards but have not used them, please share your reasons. 2 (Check all that apply) Desire quantitative guidelines Have an assessment plan in place Have not used yet, but plan to in the future No campus support for use of library standards Too many procedural/implementation questions about the Standards Use regional accreditation standards instead If you have used the document, please specify the use. (Please check all that apply). For each one checked, indicate level of usefulness: Very useful / / Not at 3 all useful To justify library budget Not at all useful To justify staff maintenance or expansion Not at all useful To justify collection upgrade To justify improvement of services in general To set or measure benchmarks for library improvement To prepare accreditation reports To engage in library self study As a guide for strategic planning Very useful To assess the library's performance To orient/educate college administration To facilitate conversations about the library Other (please describe how you used the document, and whether you found it useful for that purpose) Personnel reasons 4 Please rate the overall usefulness of the Standards for your purpose: Very useful / / Not all useful Very useful Somewhat n/a 5 Does your library use social media: Yes or No? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 If yes, what social media does your library use? (Select all that apply) Blogs/microblogs Yes Delicious or similar social bookmarks Facebook Yes Yes Flickr IM Podcasts Reading lists / saving articles such as Mendeley RSS Twitter Yes Wikis Google Plus YouTube Yes Pinterest& YouTube 7 If yes, for what purposes? (Select all that apply) Book clubs or similar activities Communication of problems such as downtime for the catalog, databases, etc. Yes Community building Yes Friends of the Library Yes Learn more about your users Yes Marketing of events Yes Promotion of library services Yes Respond to feedback, suggestions, complaints Yes

8 TRENDS Are you aware of the 2011 revision of the ACRL Standards for Libraries: Yes or No? If you are aware of these Standards but have not used them, please share your reasons. (Check all that apply) Desire quantitative guidelines Have an assessment plan in place Have not used yet, but plan to in the future No campus support for use of library standards Too many procedural/implementation questions about the Standards Use regional accreditation standards instead If you have used the document, please specify the use. (Please check all that apply). For each one checked, indicate level of usefulness: Very useful / / Not at all useful To justify library budget To justify staff maintenance or expansion To justify collection upgrade To justify improvement of services in general To set or measure benchmarks for library improvement To prepare accreditation reports To engage in library self study As a guide for strategic planning To assess the library's performance To orient/educate college administration To facilitate conversations about the library Other (please describe how you used the document, and whether you found it useful for that purpose) Please rate the overall usefulness of the Standards for your purpose: Very useful / / Not all useful Does your library use social media: Yes or No? If yes, what social media does your library use? (Select all that apply) Blogs/microblogs Delicious or similar social bookmarks Facebook Flickr IM Podcasts Reading lists / saving articles such as Mendeley RSS Twitter Wikis If yes, for what purposes? (Select all that apply) Book clubs or similar activities Communication of problems such as downtime for the catalog, databases, etc. Community building Friends of the Library Learn more about your users Marketing of events Promotion of library services Respond to feedback, suggestions, complaints Monterey Bay (IVC) San Luis Obispo Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes n/a n/a Very useful Very useful Very useful n/a Not at all useful Very useful Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes x YouTube Pinterest

9 TRENDS Are you aware of the 2011 revision of the ACRL Standards for Libraries: Yes or No? If you are aware of these Standards but have not used them, please share your reasons. (Check all that apply) Desire quantitative guidelines Have an assessment plan in place Have not used yet, but plan to in the future No campus support for use of library standards Too many procedural/implementation questions about the Standards Use regional accreditation standards instead If you have used the document, please specify the use. (Please check all that apply). For each one checked, indicate level of usefulness: Very useful / / Not at all useful To justify library budget To justify staff maintenance or expansion To justify collection upgrade To justify improvement of services in general To set or measure benchmarks for library improvement To prepare accreditation reports To engage in library self study As a guide for strategic planning To assess the library's performance To orient/educate college administration To facilitate conversations about the library Other (please describe how you used the document, and whether you found it useful for that purpose) Please rate the overall usefulness of the Standards for your purpose: Very useful / / Not all useful Does your library use social media: Yes or No? If yes, what social media does your library use? (Select all that apply) Blogs/microblogs Delicious or similar social bookmarks Facebook Flickr IM Podcasts Reading lists / saving articles such as Mendeley RSS Twitter Wikis If yes, for what purposes? (Select all that apply) Book clubs or similar activities Communication of problems such as downtime for the catalog, databases, etc. Community building Friends of the Library Learn more about your users Marketing of events Promotion of library services Respond to feedback, suggestions, complaints Yes Yes Yes n/a Yes