State & Local Tax Alert
|
|
- Martin Leonard
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Michigan Court of Appeals Holds Certain Cloud Computing Not Subject to Use Tax On October 27, 2015, the Michigan Court of Appeals held in a published decision that the purchase and use of certain cloud computing services by a Michigan insurer were not subject to Michigan use tax. 1 Specifically, transfers of data to a company resulting from the third-party use of prewritten computer software were not subject to use tax because there was no delivery of software to the company. Several additional transactions that involved the delivery of prewritten computer software or other tangible personal property were exempt from use tax because they were incidental to the rendering of professional services. Background A large insurance company that was headquartered in Michigan and had independent agents in 26 states entered into a variety of electronic technology contracts during the relevant period of December 1, 2006 to December 31, Many of these contracts used complex computing arrangements between the company and third-party providers, which resulted in litigation concerning whether these contracts were subject to Michigan use tax. The six main categories of contracts included: (i) insurance industry-specific contracts; (ii) technology and communications contracts; (iii) online research contracts; (iv) payment remittance and processing support contracts; (v) equipment maintenance and software customer support contracts; and (vi) marketing and advertising contracts. The Michigan Department of Treasury conducted a use tax audit of the company and determined two bases for use tax liability: (i) fixed asset purchase; and (ii) expense items by looking at purchases. After the Department issued a use tax deficiency, the company paid the amount due, as well as additional interest, under protest. The company subsequently filed a complaint in the Michigan Court of Claims, seeking a refund of use tax paid to the Department based on the following arguments: (i) the products were not prewritten computer software; (ii) any software involved was incidental to the services the products provided; (iii) the Department unlawfully assessed use tax on transactions subject to sales tax; and (iv) the Department used improper audit methods. After discovery was conducted, the company moved for summary disposition. Release date November 13, 2015 States Michigan Issue/Topic Sales and Use Tax Contact details Terry Conley Southfield (Detroit) T E terry.conley@us.gt.com Steve Skiba Southfield (Detroit) T E steve.skiba@us.gt.com Jamie C. Yesnowitz Washington, DC T E jamie.yesnowitz@us.gt.com Chuck Jones Chicago T E chuck.jones@us.gt.com Lori Stolly Cincinnati T E lori.stolly@us.gt.com 1 Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Department of Treasury, Michigan Court of Appeals, No , Oct. 27,
2 Grant Thornton LLP - 2 In granting the company s motion for summary disposition, the Court of Claims held that the transactions were not subject to use tax because the software was not delivered by any means. 2 Furthermore, the Court held that even if the prewritten computer software was delivered to the company, the assessment would still be invalid because the company did not exercise the necessary use to subject the software to use tax. Finally, the Court held that even if the prewritten software was delivered to and used by the company, the use was incidental to the services rendered by the third-party providers and would not subject the overall transactions to use tax. The Court accordingly entered a final order for the refund of taxes. The Department appealed this decision to the Michigan Court of Appeals. Taxation of Prewritten Computer Software The Michigan use tax is designed to cover transactions that are not subject to sales tax and is levied for the privilege of using, storing, or consuming tangible personal property in Michigan. 3 Use is defined by Michigan law as the exercise of a right or power over tangible personal property incident to the ownership of that property including transfer of the property in a transaction where possession is given. 4 Michigan law does not explain what a right or power incident to ownership of tangible personal property entails, but the Michigan Court of Appeals has held that the key determination is whether the party had some control over the property. 5 Under Michigan law, tangible personal property includes prewritten computer software. 6 Thus, prewritten computer software generally is subject to use tax. The Michigan use tax statute defines prewritten computer software as computer software, including prewritten upgrades, that is delivered by any means and that is not designed and developed by the author or other creator to the specifications of a specific purchaser. 7 However, the use tax statute does not define deliver. Michigan law defines computer software as a set of coded instructions designed to cause a computer or automatic data processing equipment to perform a task. 8 No Delivery of Prewritten Computer Software The Court of Appeals held that most of the transactions in this case were not subject to use tax because they did not involve the delivery of prewritten computer software by any means. Because Michigan use tax law does not define deliver, the Court adopted the dictionary definition of the term as hand over or convey. Based on this definition and the statutes discussed above, the Court explained that the transactions in this case were subject to use tax if the company exercised control over a set of coded instructions that was conveyed or handed over by any means and was not designed and developed by the author or other creator to the specifications of a specific purchaser. 2 Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Department of Treasury, Michigan Court of Claims, No MT, March 20, MICH. COMP. LAWS (l). 4 MICH. COMP. LAWS (b). 5 WPGP1, Inc. v. Department of Treasury, 612 N.W.2d 432 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). 6 MICH. COMP. LAWS (k). 7 MICH. COMP. LAWS b(o) (emphasis added). 8 MICH. COMP. LAWS b(c).
3 Grant Thornton LLP - 3 In reaching its decision that most of the transactions were not taxable, the Court of Appeals explained that despite coming to the correct conclusion regarding taxability under the use tax, the Court of Claims had incorrectly determined that all software remained on a third-party server. The Court of Claims held that no software was delivered because all software remained on the third-party servers and the only transfer involved information that had been processed using the third-party s software, hardware and infrastructure. However, because a desktop agent was installed on each of the company s computers with regard to one of the services, and another service used software that ran locally on the company s computers, the Court of Appeals disagreed that all software was located on third-party servers. According to the Court of Appeals, the Court of Claims also improperly narrowed the scope of deliver to preclude electronic delivery. However, the Court of Claims correctly determined that the mere transfer of information and data that was processed using the software of the third-party businesses did not constitute delivery by any means of prewritten computer software. In this situation, only data resulting from third-party use of software is delivered. The Court of Appeals held that a majority of transactions in this case were not subject to use tax because they did not involve the delivery of software by any means. After thoroughly examining the transactions, the Court determined that the company did not exercise an ownership-type right or power over the software under many of the contracts at issue. Also, the company did not have access to the computer codes that enabled the systems of the third-party providers. Furthermore, the Court noted that the company s contracts with software companies to provide maintenance and support services were not subject to use tax because they involved the provision of services rather than the delivery of prewritten computer software. Delivery of Other Prewritten Computer Software Was Incidental to Service According to the Court of Appeals, prewritten computer software or other tangible personal property was delivered to the company in several of the transactions at issue in the case. However, these transactions were not subject to use tax because they were incidental to rendering a professional service under the six-factor test provided by the Michigan Supreme Court in Catalina Marketing Sales Corp. v. Department of Treasury. 9 The incidental to service test requires a review of whether a transaction is principally a transfer of tangible personal property or a service. The Court of Appeals conducted a thorough analysis and determined that three of the contracts involved the delivery of prewritten computer software. For example, under one of the technology and communications contracts, the company purchased access to a network that was designed and used for Web conferencing. The company did not have access to the code, but the third party provided a support center that was downloaded onto several of the company s computers. In this situation, the company exercised an ownership-type right over the support center because the software was installed on the company s computers, and the company was able to control use of the software. Similarly, N.W.2d 619 (Mich. 2004). The Court of Appeals noted that the Michigan Supreme Court articulated the incidental to service test in the context of a challenge to the sales tax rather than the use tax. However, neither party challenged whether the test also applied to the use tax. In its prior analysis, the Michigan Supreme Court did not limit the test to transactions under the sales tax.
4 Grant Thornton LLP - 4 a contract for payment processing services involved the delivery of prewritten computer software. The company exercised an ownership-type right over the software by taking possession of the software, installing the software on its computers, and using the software as it wished. Finally, another contract that provided remote computer access to employees required a desktop agent constituting prewritten computer software to be installed on each computer. Also, the company received flash drives from the provider that were tangible personal property. Under this contract, the company exercised an ownership-type right over tangible personal property by taking possession of the property, installing the software on its computers, and controlling the use of the software and drives. One of the online research service contracts did not involve the transfer of prewritten computer software, but the company received print materials from the provider which constituted tangible personal property. The company exercised a right over the print materials incidental to ownership because the company received the print materials from the provider, had possession over the print materials and was able to use them at will. Even though the company exercised a right or power over tangible personal property for the contracts discussed above, the company was not taxed because these transfers of tangible personal property were incidental to the rendering of professional services. In Catalina, the Michigan Supreme Court adopted a six-factor test for determining whether a transfer of tangible personal property is incidental to the rendering of professional services: (i) what the buyer sought as the object of the transaction; (ii) what the seller or service provider is in the business of doing; (iii) whether the goods were provided as a retail enterprise with a profit-making motive; (iv) whether the tangible goods were available for sale without the service; (v) the extent to which intangible services have contributed to the value of the physical item that is transferred; and (vi) any other factors relevant to the particular transaction. The Court applied the incidental to service test factors to each of the four contracts. 10 Considering all of the factors together, the tangible personal property was incidental to the services that the company received. The company contracted with the businesses in order to receive services, and the tangible personal property was merely incidental to the provision of services. There was no indication that the taxpayer could purchase the software or other tangible personal property independent of the services. Also, the services gave value to the software and other tangible personal property. The Court of Appeals concluded that use tax did not apply to the transactions and that the Court of Claims properly granted the company s motion for summary disposition. Commentary Auto-Owners is a published decision that can be cited as precedent and unless overturned by the Michigan Supreme Court, cannot be ignored by the Department based on the facts of similarly situated taxpayers. The Department has about 40 days to file application for leave to appeal with the Michigan Supreme Court. 10 The Court noted that it did not apply the sixth element relating to any other relevant factors since the first five factors encompassed the main features of the transactions.
5 Grant Thornton LLP - 5 The decision clarifies the application of use tax to cloud computing transactions in Michigan, which have substantially grown in use and scope since the tax periods at issue. The Court focused on the delivered by any means language in the statute that defines the prewritten computer software that is subject to tax. Under the Court s reasoning, prewritten computer software is only subject to use tax if the purchaser exercises control over a set of coded instructions that was conveyed or handed over by any means. Most of the transactions at issue were not taxable because the purchaser did not exercise an ownership-type right or power over the software and never had access to any of the computer code. The Court provided a thorough analysis and separately applied this test to a wide variety of different types of contracts. Thus, taxpayers with many different types of cloud computing contracts may use this decision to support an argument that the transaction is not subject to tax provided that the purchaser did not exercise control over the software or computer code. The decision also provides guidance on the use tax treatment of contracts that involved the delivery of prewritten computer software. The Court applied the incidental to service test used in the Catalina sales tax case to a use tax context. Last year, the Michigan Court of Appeals considered a similar issue in Thomson Reuters Inc. v. Department of Treasury. 11 In reversing the Court of Claims, the Court of Appeals held that an online tax and accounting research program that provided subscribers access to a wide collection of information was not subject to use tax under Catalina because the transaction was primarily the provision of a service rather than transfer of tangible personal property. Thomson Reuters was an unpublished decision that the Department filed for leave to appeal with the Michigan Supreme Court. Leave to appeal has not yet been granted by the Michigan Supreme Court. Interestingly, and no doubt with a view that cloud computing contracts are becoming more widely used, the Department released an update in the days prior to the decision that provides guidance on the imposition of sales and use tax on cloud computing. 12 The guidance explains that cloud computing is a generic phrase that refers to a variety of delivery models over the Internet, ranging from the storage of data to the outsourcing of a customer s information technology department. The term includes the delivery of software to customers by electronic download or remote access. The Department s position 11 Michigan Court of Appeals, No , May 13, 2014 (unpublished). 12 Treasury Update, Cloud Computing: A Clearer Horizon, Michigan Department of Treasury, Nov (released Oct. 23, 2015). The Department s guidance also addressed the tax treatment of virtual currency. As explained by the Department, convertible virtual currency, such as Bitcoin, is a digital representation of value that has equivalent value in real currency or acts as a substitute for real currency. Under Michigan law, taxpayers are required to remit sales and use tax liabilities based on the dollar value of the consideration exchanged for taxable property. If the consideration is not in U.S. dollars, the taxpayer must convert the value of the consideration to dollars as of the date and at the time of the transaction. This requirement includes convertible currency exchanged for taxable property. The taxpayer accepting virtual currency must convert the value to dollars and maintain documentation indicating the value of the virtual currency on the day and at the exact time of the transaction. However, because virtual currency is not tangible personal property, purchases of virtual currency are not subject to sales and use tax. Treasury Update, Virtual Currency, Michigan Department of Treasury, Nov (released Oct. 23, 2015).
6 Grant Thornton LLP - 6 regarding whether a software transaction is subject to sales and use tax depends on the facts and circumstances of each transaction. The guidance notes the distinction between custom software and prewritten computer software. Custom software is designed for the exclusive use and special needs of a single purchaser and is exempt from sales and use tax, but prewritten computer software is subject to tax. The Department emphasized its position that it is not relevant how prewritten computer software is delivered, or whether it is accessed remotely or downloaded. If services and the right to use software are integrated or combined into one transaction, the Department will apply the incidental to service test from Catalina. The Department noted that the taxability of certain forms of cloud computing is being litigated, with no precedential decisions to date. The Department referenced Thomson Reuters, which was not considered to be precedential because it was an unpublished decision, as well as the Auto-Owners decision, which was issued for publication following issuance of the Department s update. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not intended and should not be construed as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to or suitable for specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of nontax and other tax factors. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, re-keying or using any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from Grant Thornton LLP. This document supports the marketing of professional services by Grant Thornton LLP. It is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. Persons interested in the subject of this document should contact Grant Thornton or their tax advisor to discuss the potential application of this subject matter to their particular facts and circumstances. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed.
State & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Michigan Enacts Legislation Designed to Eliminate Multistate Tax Compact Apportionment Election Refunds Allowed
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION October 27, 2015 9:00 a.m. v No. 321505 Court of Claims DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, LC No. 12-000082-MT
More informationCLOUD COMPUTING: TAX EXEMPTION S.B. 82 & 83: ANALYSIS AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE
CLOUD COMPUTING: TAX EXEMPTION S.B. 82 & 83: ANALYSIS AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE Senate Bills 82 and 83 (as reported without amendment) Sponsor: Senator Peter MacGregor (S.B. 82) Senator John Proos (S.B.
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Maryland Tax Court Holds Intangible Holding Company Had Corporate Income Tax Nexus The Maryland Tax Court has held
More informationState & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Illinois Enacts Legislation to Create Independent Tax Tribunal On August 28, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn approved
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP New Mexico Supreme Court Holds Online Retailer Has Substantial Nexus for Gross Receipts Tax Due to In-State Retailer
More informationCloud Computing: The Answer Is Still No
Cloud Computing: The Answer Is Still No by Arthur R. Rosen, Leah Robinson, and Hayes R. Holderness Arthur R. Rosen and Leah Robinson are partners at McDermott Will & Emery LLP, New York. Hayes R. Holderness
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Minnesota Tax Court Denies Use of Multistate Tax Compact s Equally-Weighted Three-Factor Apportionment Formula
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Minnesota Tax Court Holds Merchandisers Create Corporate Income Tax Nexus for Out-of-State Distributor The Minnesota
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP U.S. Bankruptcy Court Rules Imposition of Oregon Corporate Excise Tax on Out-of-State Holding Company Was Unconstitutional
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas ALJ Holds Software Delivered to Texas Is Taxable Use On July 2, 2015, a Texas Comptroller Administrative
More informationState & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas Comptroller Issues Letter Ruling Discussing Sales Tax Treatment of Various Internet and Cloud Computing Services
More informationState & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Release date October 19, 2011 New Jersey Throwout Rule Litigation and Potential Issues In Whirlpool Properties,
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas Comptroller Rules on Electricity Transmission and Distribution Cost Inclusion in COGS Deduction On March
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Nevada Enacts Budget Bill Including New Commerce Tax On June 9, 2015, Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval signed legislation
More informationState & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Major Nexus Developments of 2010 Examined; States Follow Trend of Adopting Bright-Line Nexus Standards During 2010,
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas Comptroller Amends Revised Texas Franchise Tax Cost of Goods Sold Rule On June 5, the Texas Comptroller of
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP GT Perspective on the Marketplace Fairness Act The Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA), currently under consideration
More informationState & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Release date May 16, 2011 States California California Enacts Voluntary Compliance Initiative, Expands Tax Shelter
More informationState & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP San Francisco Voters Approve New Gross Receipts Tax On November 6, San Francisco voters approved Measure E, which
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Louisiana Enacts Three-Period Tax Amnesty Program Louisiana has enacted a tax amnesty program that will be held
More informationState & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP
Release date State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP New York Tax Tribunal Holds State Could Not Force Combined Reporting with One of Taxpayer s Subsidiaries
More informationEmerging Tax Issues Surrounding Cloud Computing Transactions By S. Matthew McNeilly, CPA
Emerging Tax Issues Surrounding Cloud Computing Transactions By S. Matthew McNeilly, CPA Industry overview Although the term cloud computing can become quite technical and is utilized in many different
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-21
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-21 Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This ruling is based on the
More informationTIP on Tax: How cloud computing providers can weather the on-going tax storm
TIP on Tax: How cloud computing providers can weather the on-going tax storm By Joel Waterfield, Director, State and Local Tax Services and Steve Skiba, Director, State and Local Tax Services As cloud
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-05
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-05 Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This ruling is based on the
More informationState & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP North Carolina Enacts Significant Income, Franchise and Sales Tax Legislation, Contingent Upon Further Legislative
More informationPerformance Marketing Ass n, Inc. v. Hamer, Illinois Supreme Court, No. 114496, October 18, 2013
October 2013 Illinois Provisions of Click-Through Nexus Law Held Void The Illinois Supreme Court held that the definition provisions in Public Act 96-1544 (H.B. 3659), Laws 2011, the sales tax click-through
More informationBitcoin/Virtual Currency: Is it time for my state to provide formal guidance?
Bitcoin/Virtual Currency: Is it time for my state to provide formal guidance? Joel Waterfield Managing Director joel.waterfield@us.gt.com 703.847.7595 2014 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. Discussion
More informationState Tax Treatment of Federally Disregarded Entities: Michigan's Kmart Saga
Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives Volume 20, Number 5, August 2010 Department: S CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND LLCs State Tax Treatment of Federally Disregarded Entities: Michigan's Kmart
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 11-22 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 11-22 WARNING Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is information only. Rulings are made
More informationState and Local Sales and Compensating Use Taxes Imposed on Certain Sales of Computer Software
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau State and Local Sales and Compensating Use Taxes Imposed on Certain Sales of Computer Software Effective
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-12
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-12 Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This ruling is based on the
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL FINAL OPINION AND JUDGMENT
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL EBI-Detroit, Inc., Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 382224 Assessment No. Q340074
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF WASHINGTON. ) No. 15-0026... ) ) Registration No...
Det. No. 15-0026, 34 WTD 373 (August 31, 2015) 373 Cite as Det. No. 15-0026, 34 WTD 373 (2015) BEFORE THE APPEALS DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Petition for Refund
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-58 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-58 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
More informationCLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF APPORTIONMENT
CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF APPORTIONMENT Marilyn A. Wethekam Jordan M. Goodman The pinnacle is always small. 1 Agenda Overview of Cloud Computing and SaaS How to Approach Taxation Multistate Perspective and
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #01-15 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #01-15 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF WASHINGTON.... ) Registration No... ) Doc. No.../Audit No... ) Docket No...
Det. No. 05-0325, 27 WTD 99 (July 24, 2008) 99 Cite as Det. No. 05-0325, 27 WTD 99 (2008) BEFORE THE APPEALS DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Petition For Correction
More informationIII. Nexus Expansion Section 2 sets forth various provisions a state could use to expand a definition of doing business.
I. Introduction The attached model legislative language is a proposal for expanding sales/use tax collection requirements through state lawmaking. The proposal consists of three primary parts: 1. Nexus
More informationState Tax Chart Results
Tax Chart Results Tax Type: Sales/Use Advertising Services This chart shows whether or not the state taxes advertising services. Advertising MI Not taxable When an advertising agency goes beyond the rendering
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-29 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-29 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
More informationMarch 18, 2015. Dear XXXX:
ST 15-0020 GIL 03/18/2015 SALE OF SERVICE If no tangible personal property is transferred to the customer, then no Illinois Retailers Occupation Tax or Service Occupation Tax would apply. See 86 Ill. Adm.
More informationState and Local Tax: Up in the Air: Sales Taxation of Cloud Computing. National State and Local Tax Practice
State and Local Tax: Up in the Air: Sales Taxation of Cloud Computing Craig Williams Managing Director Marshal Kline Managing Director National State and Local Tax Practice Objectives Provide an overview
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SIGNATURE VILLAS, L.L.C., Petitioner-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION February 14, 2006 9:20 a.m. v No. 264003 Michigan Tax Tribunal CITY OF ANN ARBOR, LC No. 00-284431 Respondent-Appellee.
More informationDIGITAL GOODS & CLOUD COMPUTING
DIGITAL GOODS & IPT ANNUAL CONFERENCE CLOUD COMPUTING Jennifer Jensen S. Matthew McNeilly State & Local Tax Director Sr. Manager State/Local Tax PricewaterhouseCoopers Amazon.com McLean, VA Seattle, WA
More informationAugust 10, 2010. 2. CLIENT has Retailers located within the state of Illinois that purchase the various Call Tracking services.
ST 10-0069-GIL 08/10/2010 SERVICE OCCUPATION TAX If no tangible personal property is transferred to the customer, then no Illinois Retailers Occupation Tax or Service Occupation Tax would apply. See 86
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULLTEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 14a0024p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: GAETANO T. RIZZO, Debtor. GAETANO T. RIZZO,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ONE S TRAVEL LTD, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION April 6, 2010 9:10 a.m. v No. 287254 Court of Claims MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, LC No. 07-86-MT Defendant-Appellee.
More informationNEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION REGULATORY SERVICES BRANCH TECHNICAL BULLETIN
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION REGULATORY SERVICES BRANCH TECHNICAL BULLETIN TB - 72 ISSUED: 7-3-13 TAX: TOPIC: SALES AND USE TAX CLOUD COMPUTING (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS) This Technical Bulletin addresses the
More informationNavigating the Cloud: A Sales & Use Tax Guide
Navigating the Cloud: A Sales & Use Tax Guide Prepared by Carolynn S. Iafrate Kranz, CPA, JD, founder and Managing Member of Industry Sales Tax Solutions, LLC and her colleague Iris Kitamura, an associate
More informationState of Rhode Island - Division of Taxation
State of Rhode Island - Division of Taxation Sales and Use Tax Regulation SU 11-25 Computers, Software, and Related Systems Table of Contents RULE 1. RULE 2. RULE 3. RULE 4. RULE 5. RULE 6. RULE 7. RULE
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 10-24 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 10-24 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
More informationPetitioner submitted the following facts as the basis for this Advisory Opinion.
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Office of Tax Policy Analysis Taxpayer Guidance Division TSB-A-09(37)S STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION
More informationDraft Regulation Prewritten Software Accessed Remotely
Draft Regulation Prewritten Software Accessed Remotely The Vermont Department of Taxes is soliciting comments on draft regulatory language related to the collection of sales tax on prewritten software
More informationMarke C. Greene, Moss Adams LLP Jeffrey A. Friedman, Sutherland Michele Borens, Sutherland TEI Region VIII Conference Seattle, June 9, 2014
Marke C. Greene, Moss Adams LLP Jeffrey A. Friedman, Sutherland Michele Borens, Sutherland TEI Region VIII Conference Seattle, June 9, 2014 On Cloud 9: Almost 10 Use Cases of Cloud Taxation 1 Use Case
More informationTAXING BANKRUPTCY LIQUIDATION SALES. By Bruce A. Emard 1
TAXING BANKRUPTCY LIQUIDATION SALES I. Introduction By Bruce A. Emard 1 California taxes liquidation sales of tangible personal property (TPP) under its Sales and Use Tax Law (the Sales and Use Tax Law
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #07-35 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #07-35 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of
More informationBEFORE THE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) On June 13, 2008, the staff of the Sales Tax Audit Bureau (Bureau) of the Idaho State
BEFORE THE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO In the Matter of the Protest of, Petitioner. DOCKET NO. 21395 DECISION On June 13, 2008, the staff of the Sales Tax Audit Bureau (Bureau of the Idaho State
More informationINFORMATION BULLETIN #8 SALES TAX NOVEMBER 2011. (Replaces Bulletin #8 dated May 2002)
INFORMATION BULLETIN #8 SALES TAX NOVEMBER 2011 (Replaces Bulletin #8 dated May 2002) DISCLAIMER: SUBJECT: Information bulletins are intended to provide nontechnical assistance to the general public. Every
More informationSTATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Office of Tax Policy Analysis Taxpayer Guidance Division Novemer 14, 2007 STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 99-08
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 99-08 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 13-03 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 13-03 WARNING Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This ruling is based on the particular facts and circumstances presented, and is an interpretation
More informationMotor Freight & Transportation Charges - Taxable
MIKE KILGO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STATE OF ALABAMA 3118 30 TH AVENUE E. ALABAMA TAX TRIBUNAL TUSCALOOSA, AL 35404-4988, DOCKET NO. S. 14-1060 Taxpayer, v. STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. FINAL ORDER
More informationSALT Whitepapers. Definition of Contractor
Business Strategists Certified Public Accountants Echelbarger, Himebaugh, Tamm & Co., P.C. SALT Whitepapers The application of the Michigan Sales Tax and the Michigan Use Tax to construction contractors
More informationThe Federal Circuit Affirms a Court of Federal Claims Decision Dismissing Foreign Tax Credit Refund Claims as Untimely
Tax Controversy Services IRS Insights In this issue: The Federal Circuit Affirms a Court of Federal Claims Decision Dismissing Foreign Tax Credit Refund Claims as Untimely... 1 The Court of Federal Claims
More informationNew Technologies How to Classify/Determine Nexus and Other Issues
Tax Executives Institute Region VIII Conference Santa Barbara June 15, 2015 Jeff Friedman Michele Borens New Technologies How to Classify/Determine Nexus and Other Issues Agenda Background on Nexus What
More informationNew York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION NO.S980428A On April
More informationNo Improved Visibility For Cloud Computing Taxation
No Improved Visibility For Cloud Computing Taxation by Kendall L. Houghton and Maryann H. Luongo Kendall L. Houghton Maryann H. Luongo In the past year or so, there have been several articles written on
More informationBy: Pat Derdenger, Partner Steptoe & Johnson LLP 201 East Washington Street, 16 th Floor Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2382. Sub
ARIZONA TAX: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND THE ORMOND CASE; THE COURT OF APPEALS FINALLY ANSWERS THE QUESTION OF WHETHER A CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IS A PRIME CONTRACTOR SUBJECT TO THE ARIZONA TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Office of the Director (602) 716-6090
STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Office of the Director (602) 716-6090 CERTIFIED MAIL [redacted] The Director's Review of the Decision ) O R D E R of the Administrative Law Judge Regarding: ) ) [redacted]
More information# $There is substantial authority for the tax
!" If there is substantial authority for a position taken on a tax return, neither the taxpayer nor the tax preparer will be subject to the penalty for underreporting income even if the IRS successfully
More informationSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF REVENUE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF REVENUE COUNTY OF WAKE IN THE MATTER OF: The Proposed Assessment of Sales and Use ) Tax for the period November 1, 1999 through ) September 30, 2003, by
More informationState of South Carolina Department of Revenue 301 Gervais Street, P. O. Box 125, Columbia, South Carolina 29214 Website Address: http://www.sctax.
State of South Carolina Department of Revenue 301 Gervais Street, P. O. Box 125, Columbia, South Carolina 29214 Website Address: http://www.sctax.org SC PRIVATE LETTER RULING #12-2 SUBJECT: Application
More informationThe Model Transactional Tax Overpayment Act
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF TAXATION REPORT TO THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES RESOLUTION 1 RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association adopts the Model Transactional Tax Overpayment Act, dated February
More informationFAQ: Golden parachute payments under Section 280G
FAQ: Golden parachute payments under Section 280G Companies that are planning for a merger or acquisition have various issues to consider as they prepare for the transaction, one of the issues being golden
More informationCOLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE GUIDE TO THE MANAGED AUDIT PROGRAM FOR SALES AND USE TAXES
GUIDE TO THE FOR SALES AND USE TAXES AS OF June 29, 2007 Contents Preface Introduction to the Managed Audit Program............... 3 Reviewing your sales.................................... 5 Reviewing
More informationSTATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Office of Tax Policy Analysis Technical Services Division STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION NO. S020813A
More informationIncome Tax Guide on E-Commerce
INLAND REVENUE AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE Income Tax Guide on E-Commerce This guide is meant to assist businesses in understanding the Income Tax treatment on E- Commerce. Published 3rd Edition 23 February
More informationThis letter discusses sales of software. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 130.1935. (This is a GIL.)
ST 07-0125-GIL 08/16/2007 COMPUTER SOFTWARE This letter discusses sales of software. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 130.1935. (This is a GIL.) August 16, 2007 Dear Xxxxx: This letter is in response to your letter
More informationApplicability of the Advisers Act to Financial Advisors of Municipal Securities Issuers
Division of Investment Management: Staff Legal Bulletin No. 11 Applicability of the Advisers Act to Financial Advisors of Municipal Securities Issuers Action: Publication of Division of Investment Management
More informationCo-Chairs, NCSL Executive Committee Task Force on State and Local Taxation
August 11, 2013 Dear Legislator, Bruce W. Starr Senator Or egon Presid ent, NCSL Thomas W. Wright Chief of Staff to Speak er Alaska Staff Chair, NCSL William T. P ound Executive Dir ector On behalf of
More informationIRAS e-tax Guide INCOME TAX GUIDE ON E-COMMERCE
IRAS e-tax Guide INCOME TAX GUIDE ON E-COMMERCE Published by Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore Published on 18 Aug 2015 Disclaimers IRAS shall not be responsible or held accountable in any way for
More informationWashington Unit DECISION ON APPEAL
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Vermont Department of Taxes, No. 709-11-14 Wncv (Teachout, J., June 30, 2015) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 07-05 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 07-05 WARNING Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is information only. Rulings are made
More informationTax Management. Tax Base
Tax Management Weekly State Tax Report Reproduced with permission from Tax Management Weekly State Tax Report, Volume: 20 Issue: 43, 10/25/2013. Copyright 2013 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033)
More informationCity and County of Denver, Colorado TAX GUIDE Topic No. 18 Data Processing
City and County of Denver, Colorado TAX GUIDE Topic No. 18 Data Processing The Denver Revised Municipal Code ( DRMC ) imposes sales or use tax on the purchase price or charge for data processing equipment
More informationIRS explains business credit available to small businesses and taxexempt organizations under the Health Care Act
EY Payroll NewsFlash Vol. 11, 59 April 20, 2010 IRS explains business credit available to small businesses and taxexempt organizations under the Health Care Act This week, the IRS mailed four million postcards
More informationThe duties and the amount of time, in general, that an IT Support Specialist would spend on such duties are described below:
U.S. Department of Labor Employment Standards Administration Wage and Hour Division Washington, D.C. 20210 October 26, 2006 FLSA2006-42 Dear Name*: This is in response to your request for an opinion concerning
More informationColorado Bar Association 2014 Annual Case Law Update Tax Law Update
Colorado Bar Association 2014 Annual Case Law Update Tax Law Update Tyler Murray 1 Sales and Use Tax Dep t of Revenue v. Public Service Co. of Colo., 330 P.3d 385, (Colo. 2014). Public Service Company
More informationUnderstanding the international tax challenges of software as a service and cloud computing
Understanding the international tax challenges of software as a service and cloud computing Insights for technology companies October 2011 Randy Free, Partner, International Tax Consulting Alex Baulf,
More informationKEEPING IT LEGAL. REALTOR Resource for RESPA Issues: Transaction Fees & Home Warranty Rule. 2010 Convention Celebrating 100 Years
KEEPING IT LEGAL REALTOR Resource for RESPA Issues: Transaction Fees & Home Warranty Rule 2010 Convention Celebrating 100 Years Copyright 2010 Ohio Association of REALTORS Fee Charged by Brokerage Violates
More informationPamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and J. Clifton Cox, Special Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA VERIZON BUSINESS PURCHASING, LLC, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue
STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Janice K. Brewer Governor PRIVATE TAXPAYER RULING LR13-002 John A. Greene Director The Department issues this private taxpayer ruling in response to your letters
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Office of the Director (602) 716-6090 Janice K. Brewer Governor
STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Office of the Director (602) 716-6090 Janice K. Brewer Governor CERTIFIED MAIL [redacted] John A. Greene Director The Director's Review of the Decision ) O R D E
More informationWhat s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax
What s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax IRS Challenges Property and Casualty Policyholder Dividend Deductions Property and casualty insurance companies are allowed a deduction
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KAREN JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED August 19, 2014 v No. 316125 Wayne Circuit Court INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF LC No. 12-015537-NF PENNSYLVANIA Defendant-Appellee.
More informationSTATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
UT 02-2 Tax Type: Issue: Use Tax Use Tax On Aircraft Purchase STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
More informationLetter of Findings: 06-0349 Individual Income Tax For the Year 2004
DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE Letter of Findings: 06-0349 Individual Income Tax For the Year 2004 01-20060349.LOF NOTICE: Under IC 4-22-7-7, this document is required to be published in the Indiana Register
More informationTHOMSON REUTERS (TAX & ACCOUNTING) INC. FOREIGN NATIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM TERMS OF USE
THOMSON REUTERS (TAX & ACCOUNTING) INC. FOREIGN NATIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM TERMS OF USE 1. License and Permitted Use The Foreign National Information System (FNIS) is licensed, not sold. Subject to the
More information