ACCIDENT BENEFITS INSURERS BEWARE: IMPROPER ADJUSTING CAN BE COSTLY
|
|
- Hollie Harris
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ACCIDENT BENEFITS INSURERS BEWARE: IMPROPER ADJUSTING CAN BE COSTLY Ottawa, January 2014 Opportunistic and premeditated fraud is ubiquitous in the insurance industry, notably in the domain of Accident Benefits ( AB ). Unfortunately, this phenomenon has the ability to expose AB adjusters to the potential risk of adopting a more hardball approach to adjusting their AB claims. The consequence of taking such an approach, if unfounded, is being slapped with a costly award for aggravated damages or a special award (FSCO arbitration), and in an extreme circumstance an award for punitive damages. The Court and Financial Service Commission of Ontario ( FSCO ) are required to frequently review AB adjusters conduct and decide on whether they have breached their duty of good faith toward the insured or if they have unreasonably denied a benefit to the insured. AB Insurers and/or adjusters are repeatedly accused of the following: Breaching the insurance contract by failing to act judiciously in its denial of the claim; Breaching its duty to act reasonably and in good faith; Being unreasonable and unnecessarily causing the claimant significant financial stress, worry and anxiety; Denying the peace of mind benefits that the claimant is entitled to receive pursuant to the contract of insurance; Putting the claimant under surveillance without proper grounds and with an improper motive; Abusing section 42 assessments by frequently using and picking biased examiners to confound the claimant s medical condition; and Failing to process all claims submitted as expeditiously as possible. These are but a few of the hundreds of accusations alleged by the plaintiff bar. On some of these claims, you are damned if you do or you are damned if you don t. For example, one adjuster was being accused of being aggressive in the denial of the claim to scare away 1
2 the claimant, while also being accused of passively avoiding the claim or claims process. It is a common approach: claim everything and see what sticks! A review of the 2013 case law demonstrates that insurers are still being condemned for breaching their obligation of good faith toward their insureds and/or for unreasonably denying a benefit. Therefore, we can gain some retrospection and avoid certain re-occurring actions that have been condemned by the Courts and the FSCO. However, taking a hardball approach does not necessarily attract damages. For example, the case law demonstrated that insurers can successfully fight back against unfounded claims for breach of their duty of good faith by bringing a motion for summary judgment. What recourses are available to an insured against the Insurance Company and/or Adjuster? The Supreme Court of Canada ( SCC ) decision Smith v. Co-Operators General Insurance Company [2002 SCC 30 ( Smith )] recognized that one of the main objectives of insurance law is consumer protection, particularly in the field of automobile and home insurance. People purchase motor vehicle liability policies to protect themselves from financial and emotional stress and insecurity. Wherefore, the insurer owes the insured a duty of good faith. The duty of good faith requires an insurer to act promptly and fairly when investigating, assessing and attempting to resolve claims made by its insureds. As a result, if an insured feels that the Insurance Company and/or Adjuster ( Insurer ) have breached their duty of good faith toward them or have unreasonably denied a benefit they are able to seek recourse against the Insurer either through a court action for aggravated and/or punitive damages or by seeking a special award within the context of a FSCO arbitration. Punitive Damages In the leading SCC decision Whiten v. Pilot Insurance [2002 SCC 18, ( Pilot )], an insured sued her home insurer for damages for destruction of her house by fire. The insurer advanced the defence of arson. Even though it had no evidence to support this theory and the evidence was all to the contrary. In Pilot, Justice Binnie stated that a breach of a contractual duty of good faith is independent of and in addition to the breach of a contractual duty to pay the loss. Therefore, an independent actionable wrong must be established. As evidenced by the case law, punitive damages are very much the exception, and not the rule. Consequently, they are only imposed if there has been high-handed, malicious, arbitrary or highly reprehensible misconduct that departs to a marked degree from ordinary standards of decent behaviour. For example: planned and/or deliberate misconduct in the treatment of the insured; an intent and motive in the treatment which is contrary to the duty; persistent and prolonged outrageous conduct; attempts or acts on the part of the insurer to hide misconduct; an awareness on the part of the insurer as to its bad behaviour; the insurer profiting from the behaviour, and; the irreparable violation of a deeply personal interest of the insured. Furthermore, punitive damages are meant to punish the wrongdoer. Although, punitive damages are not the norm, they were awarded with respect to a disability insurance policy in the recent decision of Fernandes v. Penncorp Life Insurance Co./LaCo. D Assurance-Vie Penncorp [2013 CarswellOnt 3163, ( Fernandes )], in the amount 2
3 of $200,000. The Court found that the insurer had breached their duty of good faith by denying coverage or delaying payment in order to take advantage of the insured s economic situation or to gain bargaining leverage in negotiating the settlement. In addition, it was found that the adjuster had taken an adversarial approach to the claim and did not deal with it fairly or in a balanced way. Aggravated Damages AB Insurance contracts fall within the category of peace of mind contracts, which means that AB insurers are subject to being awarded aggravated damages against them for causing their insured mental distress. Not all mental stress is compensable, it has been established that incidental frustration does not qualify. The leading SCC decision for aggravated damages is Fidler v. Sunlife Assurance Co. of Canada [2006 SCC 30, ( Fidler )]. In Fidler, aggravated damages were upheld by the SCC and it was clarified that there were two types of aggravated damages: (1) those that arise out of aggravating circumstances (an independent cause of action) and (2) those that arise out of the contractual breach itself (peace of mind the parties expectations at the time of the contract formation). Therefore, aggravated damages are available as additional compensation if the insured can establish that the contract has a piece of mind component and that the mental distress was of such a magnitude to justify compensation. In Fidler, it was found that Ms. Fidler genuinely suffered significant additional distress and discomfort arising out of the loss of her disability coverage for a five year period. As evidenced by the above, the criteria for an award of aggravated damages is less stringent than what is required for an award of punitive damages. The recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, McQueen v. Echeleon General Insurance Co. [2011 ONCA 649 ( McQueen )] upheld an award of $25,000 in aggravated damages. In McQueen, it was found that from the very beginning the insurance company demonstrated an adversarial approach toward their insured. For example, the Court found that the expressions in the insurer s internal notes connoted an outmoded attitude. As a result, in behaving in this manner the insurer breached its contract of insurance with the plaintiff. Additionally, it was noted that the insurer s adversarial position poisoned the process from very early on. Interestingly, in the 2013 decision Blake v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Co. [2013 CarswellOnt 13619], the Court found that the insured was not entitled to aggravated damages as no medical evidence of compensable distress was demonstrated. In addition, it was stated that frustration, which is inevitable in life, does not constitute compensable mental distress. Special Award Similarly, in FSCO arbitrations, special damages are available to punish insurers that unreasonably fail to pay accident benefits promptly as per section 282(10) of the Insurance Act. Note that the power to make a special award is given only to an arbitrator and it is a matter of the arbitrator s discretion. In Plowright v. Wellington Insurance Co. [1993 CarswellOnt 4786], it was determined that unreasonable behavior by an insurer could be seen as excessive, imprudent, stubborn, inflexible, unyielding or immoderate. The standard of reasonableness has been interpreted as making decisions based on the best 3
4 available evidence. In the recent appeal decision of Hoang (Litigation Guardian of) v. Personal Insurance Co. of Canada (FSCO, Docket: P ) it was confirmed that an insurer had a responsibility to "carefully consider all of the available information, giving appropriate weight to that information in a fair and even-handed manner" as well as to "reassess the validity of the claim as new information is received. It is important to note that an insurer is not held to the standard of perfection, insurers are entitled to make mistakes. The recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, Zacharias v. Zurich Insurance Co. (2013 ONCA 482), demonstrates that interest is available to compensate claimants for an error made by the insurer whereas a special award is available to penalize the insurer. It is clear that the criteria for not only punitive damages, but also aggravated damages goes considerably beyond unreasonableness. Therefore, it is no surprise that awards for special damages are more common place in the domain of AB claims. Is your conduct deserving of punishment or condemnation? Here are some examples (courses of actions taken by the adjuster/insurer) which resulted in condemnation by the Courts and/or FSCO: The adjuster failed to provide any home modifications when it was clear that the claimant was constantly falling within the home and needed assistance; The adjuster failed to recognize the obvious. The Court carefully reviewed and scrutinized the internal exchanges as between the adjuster and her supervisors. It found that there was ample evidence to conclude that the claimant was entitled to benefits; The adjuster failed to properly look after the claimants needs; The adjuster failed to remedy the situation in a timely fashion and lacked the taking of action; The adjuster failed to provide the claimant with assistive devices despite a recommendation of the expert that it was needed to insure safe mobility within the home; The adjuster failed to discharge his responsibility of ensuring that the claimant s needs were met. The Court found that rather than writing long and elaborate reports internally, there was an immediate need for action on the part of the adjuster; The adjuster was more interested in saving her employer money than giving the claimant peace of mind as guaranteed by the insurance contract; The adjuster simply obtained more and more medical opinions when such a course of action was not required. The Court found that the adjuster caused damages to the claimant by delaying the inevitable; 4
5 The adjuster s file notes are evidence of an adversarial approach to the claimant s claim. The Court found that the following entries were troublesome: the claimant is expecting great things from her claim; she has retained a lawyer; the lawyer is not the easiest to deal with ; The adjuster had a negative pre-disposition toward the claimant and the adversarial position taken by the adjuster poisoned the process very early on; The adjuster failed to give the claimant the benefit of the doubt as to the reasonableness and necessity of a benefit; The adjuster delayed the claimant s access to psychological assessments and treatments by way of unsubstantiated denials; The adjuster inappropriately terminated income replacement benefits and housekeeping benefits when its own assessor opined that the claimant was unable to work and would have difficulty with certain tasks; and The adjuster incorrectly relied upon two questionable reports from assessors on the claimant s ability to return to reasonably suitable alternative employment. What recourse is available to the insurer for an unfounded claim of breach of good faith? In the recent 2013 decision, Spadafor v. The Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company [2013 ONSC 182 ( Spadafor )], a Superior Court judge granted the insurer s summary judgment motion to dismiss claims for breach of a contract of insurance, damages for wrongful infliction of mental distress, damages for bad faith on the part of the defendant insurance company and aggravated and punitive damages in the amount of $100,000. Spadafor is noteworthy because it demonstrates that insurers do have a recourse against unfounded allegations that they have breached their obligation of good faith. In addition, as demonstrated by Spadafor insurers should not shy away from bringing a motion for summary judgment if there is no evidence to support such a claim. Which may result in a decrease in Statement of Claims pleading damages for wrongful infliction of mental distress and/or damages for bad faith on the part of the insurer. Conclusion Due to the nature of automobile insurance, as stated in Smith, it is no surprise that the Courts and FSCO are required to frequently review AB adjusters conduct and decide on whether they have breached their duty of good faith toward the insured or if they have unreasonably denied a benefit to the insured. The case law demonstrates that insurers are able to make mistakes. For instance, an isolated error in the processing of a claim will not necessarily be illustrative of bad faith. That said, the trend nonetheless appears that AB adjusters are being held to a much higher standard than before. However, this should not sway AB adjusters from taking a hardball approach when warranted, because it is a known fact that fraudulent claims are on the rise. Therefore, in order to avoid the likelihood of 5
6 being slapped with a costly award, AB adjusters should ensure that they: act promptly, fairly, in a well-reasoned manner and consider all of the available evidence. Additionally, it is paramount that AB adjusters not forget that all actions taken with respect to a claim, including internal notes and s, will be scrutinized to their detriment. About the Authors Marc E. Smith Marc is a founding principal of the law firm Forget Smith Morel ( and his practice is comprised primarily of insurance defence, including bodily injury, accident benefits and property damage as well as subrogated actions. Charlotte Porter Charlotte is the newest associate to join Forget Smith Morel and her practice is principally focused on insurance defence, including bodily injury, accident benefits and property damage. 6
AGGRAVATED AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES. The same conduct may give rise to aggravated and/or punitive damages
Nelligan O Brien Payne LLP www.nelligan.ca AGGRAVATED AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES June 2006 Overview The same conduct may give rise to aggravated and/or punitive damages Aggravated damages are compensatory while
More informationFidler v. Sun Life an Aggravating Decision
Fidler v. Sun Life an Aggravating Decision Eric J. Schjerning Blaney McMurtry LLP 416.596.2881 eschjerning@blaney.com AN AGGRAVATING DECISION by Eric Schjerning The Supreme Court of Canada recently released
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
(PRECEDENT STATEMENT OF CLAIM A ) Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: ******************** Plaintiff and ******** corporation Defendant STATEMENT OF CLAIM TO THE DEFENDANT A LEGAL
More informationONTARIO TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION. OTLA s Response to the Anti-Fraud Task Force Status Update
ONTARIO TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION OTLA s Response to the Anti-Fraud Task Force Status Update 8/17/2012 The Ontario Trial Lawyers Association (OTLA) welcomes the opportunity to provide comment on the Ontario
More informationPUNITIVE AND AGGRAVATED DAMAGES FROM A DEFENCE PERSPECTIVE. Maura Thompson and Alex Neaves, Shillingtons LLP
PUNITIVE AND AGGRAVATED DAMAGES FROM A DEFENCE PERSPECTIVE Maura Thompson and Alex Neaves, Shillingtons LLP Post-Whiten, Ontario courts have been busier than usual dealing with claims for punitive and
More informationRemedies and Damages Available in Long Term Disability Litigation
Remedies and Damages Available in Long Term Disability Litigation Andrew Wray and Niiti Simmonds 1 Pinto Wray James LLP Table of Contents I. Introduction... 2 II. Basic Features of Long Term Disability
More informationRE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO. Defendants v.
COURT FILE NO.: 4022A/07 (Milton) DATE: 20090401 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO Defendants
More informationJENNIFER (COLMAN) JACOBI MMG INSURANCE COMPANY. in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Cuddy, J.) in favor of Jennifer (Colman)
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2011 ME 56 Docket: Han-10-526 Argued: April 12, 2011 Decided: May 10, 2011 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN, and JABAR,
More informationFactors to Consider When Handling a Long Term Disability Benefits Case. Several issues may arise in the course of a lawsuit for long term disability
Factors to Consider When Handling a Long Term Disability Benefits Case Several issues may arise in the course of a lawsuit for long term disability benefits. This paper provides strategic suggestions on
More informationTHE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education
33 THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education Insurance Bad Faith: Strategies for Avoiding or Pursuing Claims May 28, 2015 Telephone Seminar/Audio Webcast Insurance Bad Faith: Strategies for
More informationINVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees
INTRODUCTION INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees By: Maureen S. Binetti, Esq. Christopher R. Binetti, Paralegal Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. When can the investigation which may
More informationPUNITIVE DAMAGES IN MOTOR VEHICLE LITIGATION. In McIntyre v. Grigg et al (2006) 83 O.R. (3d), 161, the Court of
PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN MOTOR VEHICLE LITIGATION PART 1 - INTRODUCTION In McIntyre v. Grigg et al (2006) 83 O.R. (3d), 161, the Court of Appeal, for the first time, considered the issue of whether punitive
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT
Filed 10/11/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT ED AGUILAR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B238853 (Los Angeles County
More informationTHE INNOCENT CO-INSURED
Veronica S.C. Rossos 2 Veronica S.C. Rossos TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 3 II. DEFINITIONS... 4 III. THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION OF INSURANCE POLICIES... 4 IV. AND THE SCOTT ANALYSIS...
More informationThe two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive
More informationTHE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White
THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)
More informationHARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH
HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH Prepared By: Michael F. Schmidt P25213 HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. 1050 Wilshire Drive, Suite 320 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 649-7800 Fax (248) 649-2316 A. INTRODUCTION Subject to specific
More informationCASE SUMMARIES. November 10, 2014. Nguyen v. SSQ Life Insurance Company Inc., 2014 ONSC 6405 (S.C.J.) IN THIS ISSUE UPCOMING EVENTS
CASE SUMMARIES November 10, 2014 IN THIS ISSUE Nguyen v. SSQ Life Insurance Company Inc., 2014 ONSC 6405 (S.C.J.) The Defendant brought a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the Plaintiff's claim for
More informationFORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION
The plaintiff in Schmidt filed suit against her employer, Personalized Audio Visual, Inc. ("PAV") and PAV s president, Dennis Smith ("Smith"). 684 A.2d at 68. Her Complaint alleged several causes of action
More informationUPDATE ON PERSONAL INJURY LAW AND PRACTICE. May 9 12, 2012. William A. G. Simpson
UPDATE ON PERSONAL INJURY LAW AND PRACTICE 22 nd Annual Conference of The Institute of Law Clerks of Ontario May 9 12, 2012 William A. G. Simpson Partner Lerners LLP (London) This paper will provide a
More informationNo-Fault Automobile Insurance
No-Fault Automobile Insurance By Margaret C. Jasper, Esq. Prior to the enactment of state no-fault insurance legislation, recovery for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident were subject
More informationLAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001
1 LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE OBJECTIVES OF THE LEGISLATION The purpose of this Bill is to address the impact of the decision of the High
More informationMotor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95
New South Wales Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 2 4 Amendment of other
More informationDiscovery in Bad Faith Insurance Claims: State of the Law, Successful Strategies. Teleconference Program Wednesday, March 29, 2006
Discovery in Bad Faith Insurance Claims: State of the Law, Successful Strategies Teleconference Program Wednesday, March 29, 2006 Topic III A. Who is suing? Does it matter? 1. Whether suit is brought by
More informationInsurance claims and losses in Spain. Procedural aspects of the Spanish legal system
Insurance claims and losses in Spain. Procedural aspects of the Spanish legal system Further information If you would like further information, please contact a person mentioned below or the person with
More informationOur Personal Injury Guidebook
Our Personal Injury Guidebook Partnering with you on your road to recovery 2 Table of Contents Injured? You Must Take the Following Steps........... 3 Our Promise to Our Clients.................... 4 At
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
No. Vancouver Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: BENJAMIN TEPEI, ADRIAN TEPEI, ANGELICA TELESCU, CAMELIA COLCER, DAN TEPEI by his litigation guardian, Dina Tepei, and the said DINA
More information2014 IL App (1st) 130250-U. No. 1-13-0250 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2014 IL App (1st) 130250-U FIFTH DIVISION September 12, 2014 No. 1-13-0250 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you were injured or provided treatment for an injury and filed a claim under your Allstate Med Pay coverage, and were compensated in an amount
More informationLong-Term Disability A GUIDE TO YOUR INSURANCE CLAIM
Long-Term Disability A GUIDE TO YOUR INSURANCE CLAIM CANTINI LAW GROUP ATLANTIC CANADA S INJURY LAWYERS Table of contents 3 Background information about LTD insurance What is LTD insurance? How is LTD
More informationNo. 3 10 0439. Order filed April 25, 2011 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2011
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). No. 3 10 0439 Order filed April
More informationDAMAGES FOR LATE PAYMENT AND THE INSURER S DUTY OF GOOD FAITH SUMMARY
DAMAGES FOR LATE PAYMENT AND THE INSURER S DUTY OF GOOD FAITH SUMMARY S.1 In this Issues Paper we consider whether a policyholder should be entitled to damages where the insurer has refused to pay a valid
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
More informationFILED December 15, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL
NOTICE This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (4th 150225-U NO. 4-15-0225
More informationMore than you bargained for -
More than you bargained for - The effect of British Columbia s Universal Automobile Insurance on American, and other out-of-province, Insurance Policies 1. INTRODUCTION When motorists venture into the
More informationThe Insurance Amendment Act One Year Later
The Insurance Amendment Act One Year Later Andrew P. Loewen Fillmore Riley LLP 1700-360 Main Street Winnipeg, MB R3C 3Z3 (204) 957-8360 Email: andrewloewen@fillmoreriley.com 1 On September 1, 2014, the
More informationLIMITATION UPDATE. 1. Recently, the Courts have been looking at three areas of limitation law and
LIMITATION UPDATE 1. Recently, the Courts have been looking at three areas of limitation law and practice. One is when it is permissible to introduce a new claim in pending proceedings after the limitation
More informationOur Personal Injury Guidebook
Our Personal Injury Guidebook Partnering with you on your road to recovery 2 Table of Contents Injured? You Must Take the Following Steps........... 3 Our Promise to Our Clients.................... 4 At
More informationBy: Gerald M. Richardson
MANAGING THE RISKS POSED BY THE THREE PUBLIC POLICY WRONGFUL DISCHARGE CASES RECENTLY DECIDED BY THE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT By: Gerald M. Richardson I. An At Will Employee Can Sue His Employer on a Claim
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSURANCE LAW UPDATE
THE MCCORMACK FIRM, LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW MASSACHUSETTS INSURANCE LAW UPDATE Plaintiff Awarded in Excess of $1 Million For Insurer s Failure to Settle Automobile Liability Claim Within $20,000 Policy Limits
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as Dunn v. State Auto. Mut. Ins., 2013-Ohio-4758.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) COLUMBUS E. DUNN Appellant C.A. No. 12CA010332 v. STATE
More information12 May 2014. Professor Barbara McDonald Commissioner Australian Law Reform Commission GPO Box 3708 Sydney NSW 2001. By Email to: info@alrc.gov.
12 May 2014 Geoff Bowyer T 03 9607 9497 F 03 9607 5270 president@liv.asn.au Professor Barbara McDonald Commissioner Australian Law Reform Commission GPO Box 3708 Sydney NSW 2001 By Email to: info@alrc.gov.au
More informationPersonal injury claim" does not include a claim for compensatory benefits pursuant to worker s compensation or veterans benefits.
Wisconsin AB 19 (2013) (a) Personal injury claim" means any claim for damages, loss, indemnification, contribution, restitution or other relief, including punitive damages, that is related to bodily injury
More informationHow To Process A Small Claims Case In Anarizonia
What is a small claims division? Every justice court in Arizona has a small claims division to provide an inexpensive and speedy method for resolving most civil disputes that do not exceed $2,500. All
More informationACCIDENT BENEFITS: RECENT CHANGES AND DEVELOPMENTS
The Law Society of Upper Canada October 18, 2007 ACCIDENT BENEFITS: RECENT CHANGES AND DEVELOPMENTS Richard M. Bogoroch, Melinda J. Baxter and Tripta S. Chandler Bogoroch & Associates REPRESENTING PERSONS
More informationContracting with Suppliers A Balanced Approach to Indemnities and Limitations of Liability!!"#$%&'(&)*+,"-&
Contracting with Suppliers A Balanced Approach to Indemnities and Limitations of Liability!!"#$%&'(&)*+,"-& "#$%!&'!&())! Co-presented by the Association of Corporate Counsel Ontario Chapter and WeirFoulds
More informationCCBE POSITION WITH RESPECT TO THE FREE CHOICE OF A LAWYER IN RELATION TO LEGAL EXPENSES INSURANCE
CCBE POSITION WITH RESPECT TO THE FREE CHOICE OF A LAWYER IN RELATION TO LEGAL EXPENSES INSURANCE CCBE position with respect to the free choice of a lawyer in relation to legal expenses insurance The Council
More informationOffice of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Complaints and Investigations Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility 1500 Landmark Towers 345 St. Peter Street St. Paul, MN 55102-1218 (651) 296-3952
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More informationCivil Suits: The Process
Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized
More informationSo You Received A Sexual Harassment Complaint, What To Do and What Not To Do A Trial Lawyer s Perspective
So You Received A Sexual Harassment Complaint, What To Do and What Not To Do A Trial Lawyer s Perspective Presented by Kyle Kring and Laura Hess Kring & Chung, LLP 2014 California HR Conference August
More informationVIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
More informationWhy Obtain Student Medical Malpractice Insurance?
Why Obtain Student Medical Malpractice Insurance? Important Notice & Disclaimer Please Read! This presentation is for use by Western Washington University (WWU) students only. Neither WWU, nor any officer,
More informationChapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July 2006. Manual of Legal Aid
Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES Last Amended: 1 July 2006 Manual of Legal Aid TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 6B - STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES GENERAL...3 PROVISION OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE...3 GENERAL GUIDELINES
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * *
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA vs. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER CV-99-792 Defendants. COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiffs, Bryan K. Bunten and Lisa Bunten, are over the age of nineteen (19) years
More informationNorthern Insurance Company of New York v. Resinski
MONTGOMERY COUNTY LAW REPORTER 140-301 2003 MBA 30 Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Resinski [140 M.C.L.R., Part II Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Resinski APPEAL and ERROR Motion for Summary
More informationNO. 03-B-0910 IN RE: HARRY E. CANTRELL, JR. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
05/02/03 See News Release 032 for any concurrences and/or dissents. SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 03-B-0910 IN RE: HARRY E. CANTRELL, JR. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This matter arises
More information2009 BCCA 78 Pearlman v. American Commerce Insurance Company
Page 1 of 8 COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Pearlman v. American Commerce Insurance Company, 2009 BCCA 78 David Pearlman American Commerce Insurance Company, and Betsy Morrisette
More informationOREGON LAW AT-A-GLANCE
1. ASSUMPTION OF THE RISK: This doctrine was abolished in Oregon. ORS 31.620(2). But see Comparative Negligence below. 2. COLLATERAL SOURCE RULE: The Court may deduct from a damages award certain collateral
More informationMotor Legal Expenses Insurance
Motor Legal Expenses Insurance Motor Legal Expenses Insurance Policy Document Certificate of Insurance This insurance is underwritten by Inter Partner Assistance SA and managed on their behalf by Arc Legal
More informationThe Duty of Good Faith: Getting More (or Less) Than You Bargained For. March 6, 2013
The Duty of Good Faith: Getting More (or Less) Than You Bargained For March 6, 2013 The Duty of Good Faith: Getting More (or Less) Than You Bargained For Ian R. Dick Jeffrey E. Goodman Frank J. Cesario
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Zurich Insurance Company v. Chubb Insurance Company of Canada, 2014 ONCA 400 DATE: 20140515 DOCKET: C57553 BETWEEN Juriansz, Pepall and Pardu JJ.A. Zurich Insurance
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY
THE HONORABLE CAROL MURPHY 1 1 1 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY TARVA LEE, ) ) No: --00- Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF ) CONTRACT, BAD FAITH, FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationTitle XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter
Title XLV TORTS Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE View Entire Chapter 768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification;
More informationGLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A
More informationU.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (MD) Assistant General Counsel for Administration 301-415-1550
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (MD) MD 7.1 TORT CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES DT-10-06 Volume 7: Legal and Ethical Guidelines Approved By: Gregory B. Jaczko, Chairman Date Approved:
More informationCase Name: Sousa v. Akulu. Between Sousa, and Akulu et al. [2006] O.J. No. 3061. 36 C.P.C. (6th) 158. 150 A.C.W.S. (3d) 320. 2006 CarswellOnt 4640
Page 1 of 5 Case Name: Sousa v. Akulu Between Sousa, and Akulu et al [2006] O.J. No. 3061 36 C.P.C. (6th) 158 150 A.C.W.S. (3d) 320 2006 CarswellOnt 4640 Court File No. 05-CV-282383PD 3 Ontario Superior
More informationCovering the Field: Sport-Related Personal Injuries and Insurance Coverage. By Anita G. Wandzura. McKercher LLP
Covering the Field: Sport-Related Personal Injuries and Insurance Coverage By Anita G. Wandzura McKercher LLP #1 Ranked Law Firm in Saskatchewan Canadian Lawyer Magazine, October 2011 November 2011 McKercher
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES L. MARTIN, Plaintiff Below- Appellant, v. NATIONAL GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant Below- Appellee. No. 590, 2013 Court Below Superior Court of
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: DECEMBER 7, 2012; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED ORDERED PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 8, 2013; 10:00 A.M. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2011-CA-000990-MR RANDY PEZZAROSSI APPELLANT APPEAL
More informationS09G0492. FORTNER v. GRANGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. We granted certiorari in this case, Fortner v. Grange Mutual Ins. Co., 294
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: October 19, 2009 S09G0492. FORTNER v. GRANGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. NAHMIAS, Justice. We granted certiorari in this case, Fortner v. Grange Mutual Ins. Co.,
More informationCase 1:10-cv-02583-CCB Document 28 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:10-cv-02583-CCB Document 28 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CRYSTAL WILLIAMS * * v. * Case No. CCB-10-2583 * TRAVCO INSURANCE CO. * ******
More informationEVER ESCALATING CLAIMS: THE EVOLVING AUTO INSURANCE PRODUCT STRESSES ON THE SYSTEM By: Catherine Korte
EVER ESCALATING CLAIMS: THE EVOLVING AUTO INSURANCE PRODUCT STRESSES ON THE SYSTEM By: Catherine Korte For those of you who self insure, let s say the first million. For those of you who own fleets. For
More informationThe tort of bad faith failure to pay or investigate is still an often plead claim by
BAD FAITH VERDICTS The tort of bad faith failure to pay or investigate is still an often plead claim by the insured. Recent case law relies primarily on court precedent when determining whether the insured
More information2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order
More informationCourt File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. BETWEEN: JEAN-FRANCOIS FARJON and REBECCA SOROKA. -and-
Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: JEAN-FRANCOIS FARJON and REBECCA SOROKA -and- PLAINTIFFS DR. CHRISTIANE FARAZLI, and C. FARAZLI MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION DEFENDANTS STATEMENT
More informationNOTICE TO MONEY CONCEPT (BARRIE) CLIENTS OF EITHER DAVID KARAS OR JAMES STEPHENSON INVOLVED IN LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS
NOTICE TO MONEY CONCEPT (BARRIE) CLIENTS OF EITHER DAVID KARAS OR JAMES STEPHENSON INVOLVED IN LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL This is a court authorized
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Richard v. British Columbia, 2014 BCSC 1290 William Joseph Richard and W.H.M. Date: 20140714 Docket: S024338 Registry: Vancouver Plaintiffs
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 40459-1-II Appellant, UNPUBLISHED OPINION v. LOVERA M. BLACKCROW, Respondent. Armstrong, J. The Clallam County Superior
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Ludwig. J. July 9, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHLEEN M. KELLY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : No. 09-1641 NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE : INSURANCE COMPANY : MEMORANDUM Ludwig. J.
More informationMEDICAL COLLECTION ACTIVITIES BY U.S. PROVIDERS
MEDICAL COLLECTION ACTIVITIES BY U.S. PROVIDERS Timothy M. Hartley, Esq. Hartley Law Offices, PLC 800 SE Third Avenue Fourth Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 T-954.357.9973 F-954.357.2275 Medical Collection
More informationCGL 101 - Understanding Commercial General Liability Policy
Proudly presents CGL 101 - Understanding Commercial General Liability Policy Maurice Audet, Senior Vice President Aon Reed Stenhouse Inc. maurice.audet@aon.ca Tom Ozere, Partner Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
More informationCITATION: Bradley Michael Mulhall v. The Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, 2015 ONSC 7495 LINDSAY COURT FILE NO.: 07/09 DATE: 20151218
CITATION: Bradley Michael Mulhall v. The Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, 2015 ONSC 7495 LINDSAY COURT FILE NO.: 07/09 DATE: 20151218 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: Bradley Michael Mulhall,
More information****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
More informationPOLICY NO. 3-80 LEGAL DEFENSE BENEFIT
FLORIDA POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC. POLICY NO. 3-80 LEGAL DEFENSE BENEFIT BACKGROUND: In order to provide legal defense benefits to the members of Florida P.B.A., the Board of Directors hereby
More informationStatement of the Case
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
COURT FILE NO.: CV-07-0159-00B1 DATE: October 08, 2009 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: 1013952 ONTARIO INC., operating as the No one attending for Plaintiff Silverado Restaurant and Nightclub
More informationOrient Overseas Assoc. v XL Ins. Am., Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 30488(U) February 26, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652292/2013 Judge:
Orient Overseas Assoc. v XL Ins. Am., Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 30488(U) February 26, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652292/2013 Judge: Melvin L. Schweitzer Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationMONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.
,5SEPV Wl0: 3ii /"'LCD JCOURT MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY Robert Jacobsen, -vs- Allstate Insurance Company, Plaintiff, Defendant. Cause No.: ADV-03-201(d) Final Order Approving
More informationGOOD, THE BAD FAITH AND THE UGLY
P. Wheeler Neil & Associates LLP Lerner Adelaide Street West 130 2400 Suite Box 95 P.O. ON Toronto, No. (416)601-2384 Tel. No. (416) 867-9192 Fax THE BILL 59 ACCIDENT BENEFITS CLAIM: SETTLING GOOD, THE
More informationD.C., A MINOR V. HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCH., 98 Cal. Rptr. 3d 300. Plaintiff D.C., a student, appealed a Los Angeles Superior Court decision in favor of
D.C., A MINOR V. HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCH., 98 Cal. Rptr. 3d 300 Raquel Rivera Rutgers Conflict Resolution Law Journal November 22, 2010 Brief Summary: Plaintiff D.C., a student, appealed a Los Angeles Superior
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, JOSEPH DELFRATE, and sues the Defendant,
Case 8:10-cv-01091-SDM-AEP Document 1 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 8 JOSEPH DELFRATE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING MYSPINE, PS, a Washington professional services corporation; BODY RECOVERY CLINIC LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company; and YAROSLAV KUTSY, Plaintiffs,
More informationIN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2015. Appeal No. 2014AP157 DISTRICT IV DENNIS D. DUFOUR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT,
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the
More informationONTARIO MUTUAL INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OCTOBER 2003 PUNITIVE DAMAGE CLAIMS PROPER CLAIMS MANAGEMENT AND DEFENCE STRATEGIES 1 2
ONTARIO MUTUAL INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OCTOBER 2003 PUNITIVE DAMAGE CLAIMS PROPER CLAIMS MANAGEMENT AND DEFENCE STRATEGIES 1 2 HARRY F. STEINMETZ LERNERS LLP 1 With special thanks to Kirk Stevens & Julian
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION COPLEY ASSOCIATES, LTD., DECEMBER TERM, 2005 Plaintiff, NO. 01332 v. COMMERCE PROGRAM ERIE
More information(1) It was something fairly and naturally incidental to the employer's business assigned to the employee; and
Employer Liability for Employee Conduct by Lisa Mann 05-01-2000 EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR EMPLOYEE CONDUCT: When Does An Employer Have to Pay? by Lisa Mann Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A. Employers
More informationAM ENDED T AY OF.0.4Q11) D. a-004. PURSUMT Tr'
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON Action No. 0403-12898 BETWEEN: TANYA LAB ONTE Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ln RIGHT OF ALBERTA as represented by THE DIRECTOR
More informationNO. 00-B-3532 IN RE: LEONARD O. PARKER, JR ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
03/15/02 See News Release 020 for any concurrences and/or dissents. SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 00-B-3532 IN RE: LEONARD O. PARKER, JR ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This disciplinary
More information