2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report for Four-Year Colleges and Universities
|
|
- Allen Pitts
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Trends in Enrollment Management 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report for Four-Year Colleges and Universities What s working in undergraduate student recruitment and marketing? To find out, Ruffalo Noel Levitz conducted a 105-item, web-based poll of campus officials in November of 2015 as part of the firm s continuing series of benchmark polls for higher education. For context, comparative findings from previous studies of marketing and recruitment practices are available on the Ruffalo Noel Levitz website, as this study is repeated every two years. Among the highlights: continues to be when communicating with prospective students, but many undergraduate officials now give even higher marks to text messaging. Events and event-related activities head the lists of the top 10 most strategies and tactics across four-year private and public. Advertising is fairly popular, with online ads receiving the highest marks, but respondents generally rated the ness of advertising lower compared to other practices. Overnight campus visits and college-paid trips to campus appear to be but under-utilized practices for private, while weekend visit days and campus visits designed for school counselors appear to be but under-utilized for public. Use of a CRM for managing and tracking recruitment communications ranked at the top of 13 internal operations practices. Fall of the senior year of high school was among the most popular times for purchasing high school student names from list vendors such as NRCCUA, the College Board, and ACT. Only about 10 percent of private and public respondents in this study gave an excellent rating to their strategic, multi-year enrollment plan, and nearly 40 percent indicated they don t have one. Adjusting the content and timing of communication flows was the number one way respondents are planning to respond to the federal government s new FAFSA rules, commonly known as Prior-Prior Year. The above is just a sampling of this year s findings. Please see the Appendix of this report for detailed findings from all 105 items on the poll Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 1
2 See the Appendix for detailed findings from all 105 items on the poll. CONTENTS Highlights Top five most modes of communication for undergraduate marketing and student recruitment Top 10 strategies and tactics Five least- strategies and tactics Five least-used strategies and tactics, including promising practices Top five internal operations 6 Search practices highlights/initial outreach to high school students Volume of written contacts 7 9 Planning and leadership practices highlights 10 Plans in response to federal government s new FAFSA rules NEW! 12 APPENDIX/COMPLETE FINDINGS Complete findings by institution type 13 Rankings of 61 practices by their ness and usage Division that oversees the chief enrollment officer Rankings of 10 methods for making initial contact with high-school-age purchased names Rankings of 8 advertising practices Usage of student-to-student contact programs And more Responding 42 About Ruffalo Noel Levitz and our higher education research 44 Findings color key: private public About the rankings and the statistical process used in this study All of the findings in this report are judged to be statistically significant. This determination was made by calculating a statistical confidence interval for each finding (e.g., means, medians, proportions, and other relevant test statistics) and then judging the confidence interval to be acceptably small relative to the size of the finding. Note that this study s rankings are by ness and usage. To rank the most and least practices, respondents were asked to rate each practice on the following scale: Very Somewhat Minimally Practice not used To report the findings as accurately as possible, the rankings of ness were based only on the relative ness options that were chosen by respondents: very, somewhat, and minimally. This approach of excluding the fourth response, practice not used, allows promising, less-frequentlyused practices to be included in the top 10 rankings those practices that are rated very but which are not currently being used by the majority of. Note: To identify the proportion of using a particular practice, a simple calculation was made of the inverse of those who selected practice not used Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 2
3 HIGHLIGHTS Top five most modes of communication for undergraduate marketing and student recruitment, by institution type Highlighted below is a small sampling of the communication findings of this study. This table shows the five modes of communication that respondents from four-year private and public most frequently rated very among 10 modes that were measured. Rankings by ness* private public 1 Website optimized for mobile browsers Website optimized for mobile browsers 2 Text messaging communication 3 communication Text messaging 4 Recruiting page(s) on website Recruiting page(s) on website 5 Calling cell phones Publications in general (viewbook, search piece, etc.) Highlights from these rankings: Mobile-friendly websites were number one in this year s rankings of communication modes, but and text messaging vied for the next-highest rating. In addition, the majority of respondents from both sectors rated cell phone calls, publications, and additional modes of communication not shown here, such as social media and websiteembedded videos, either very or somewhat. Please see the Appendix for details (pages 14 and 28). Boldface in this table indicates a mode of communication that was not being used by more than one-quarter of within the sector. Institutions not using text messaging may want to consider using it, especially given its high ratings for ness and the increasing number of prospective students who are open to receiving text messages from colleges, including up to 70 percent of high school juniors and seniors. 1 *Reminder: Rating options for this study included very, somewhat, minimally, and practice not used. Respondents who selected practice not used were excluded from the ness ratings. See explanation on page 2. More communication findings Online display ads were the top-rated form of advertising for public, while private gave highest marks to pay-per-click ads on search sites like Google, Bing, or Yahoo. See the Appendix, pages 20 and 34. Five or six contacts was the median per-student volume of recruiting contacts (phone and written) initiated by student employees working for admissions/recruitment offices. See the Appendix, pages 26 and Ruffalo Noel Levitz, OmniUpdate, CollegeWeekLive, & NRCCUA e-expectations report. Cedar Rapids: Ruffalo Noel Levitz, Available at Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 3
4 HIGHLIGHTS Top 10 most strategies and tactics for undergraduate marketing and student recruitment, by institution type Below are the 10 survey items, by sector, that respondents from four-year most frequently rated very among 61 strategies and tactics for marketing and student recruitment. The 61 practices ranged widely and included events, digital marketing, advertising, targeting specific populations, partnering with outside organizations, and other proven or emerging strategies. Rankings by ness private public 1 Campus open house events Campus open house events Overnight visits for high school students Campus visit days for high school students Encouraging prospective students to apply on the admissions website A planned, sequential flow of communication to prospective students, from the beginning to the end of the recruiting cycle Encouraging prospective students to schedule campus visits on the admissions website High school visits by admission representatives to primary markets Campus visit days for high school students Meetings or events for high school counselors Encouraging prospective students to apply on the admissions website Campus visit events designed for school counselors Encouraging prospective students to schedule campus visits on the admissions website Weekend visit days 8 Weekend visit days Community college visits 9 College-paid trips to campus for prospective students 10 Targeting in-state students A planned, sequential flow of communication to prospective students, from the beginning to the end of the recruiting cycle High school visits by admission representatives to primary markets Highlights from these rankings: Campus open houses topped the list of strategies and tactics, with campus visit days close behind. Also rated in the top three were overnight visits for high school students, for private, and campus visit events designed for school counselors, for public. Boldface in this table indicates practices that were not being used by more than one-quarter of within the sector, despite the ratings of ness. Institutions not using these practices may want to consider using them. For example, twothirds of respondents from private were not using college-paid trips to campus and approximately one-quarter of respondents from public were not using weekend visit days. Please see the Appendix for details (pages 15 and 29) Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 4
5 HIGHLIGHTS Five least- strategies and tactics This table shows the five items that respondents from four-year most frequently rated minimally among the 61 strategies and tactics that were measured for their ness and usage. Rankings by inness private public 1 Mailing course schedules to residents in area Asking current students/alumni for applicant referrals 2 Online college fairs Recruiting through business/industry 3 Asking current students/alumni for applicant referrals Online college fairs 4 Targeting veterans Targeting adult learners 5 Cooperative or consortia-based recruiting Radio ads Highlights from these rankings: Respondents from private and public were in agreement that online college fairs and asking current students/alumni for applicant referrals were minimally. However, there was also considerable disagreement between sectors. For example, targeting adult learners was rated relatively high in ness by respondents from private, despite its low ranking by respondents from public. Please see the Appendix for specific proportions of respondents choosing each rating category. Boldface in this table indicates practices that were being used by half or more of within the sector despite being ranked minimally. For example, 52 percent of public reported using online college fairs, as shown in the Appendix on page 32. Five least-used strategies and tactics, including promising practices Note that least-used practices may be least-used for distinct reasons. For example, a practice may be least used because it is in or it may be because it is a practice that has not yet caught on widely (see boldface definition below). Rankings by ness private public 1 Mailing course schedules to residents in area Mailing course schedules to residents in area 2 Offering loans directly from the college or university 3 Online college fairs 4 Admissions decisions on the spot in high schools or during campus visits/open houses 5 Targeting part-time students Offering loans directly from the college or university Overnight visits for high school students Targeting part-time students Routine contacts by financial aid office professional staff to assess student reactions to financial aid awards Highlights from these rankings: Two of the least-used practices for private appeared to be promising practices, as highlighted in boldface. For public, only one practice is highlighted; overnight visits showed promise for public, but there were not enough respondents to rate ness (see usage levels in Appendix). Boldface in this table indicates practices that half or more of respondents rated very or somewhat Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 5
6 HIGHLIGHTS Top five internal operations practices The table below shows the five internal operations that respondents from four-year private and public most frequently rated very among 13 internal operations that were measured for undergraduate marketing and student recruitment. Rankings by ness private CRM solution for managing and tracking recruitment communications, online applications, etc. Outsourcing telephone qualification to rate the interest levels of prospective students by phone Using a statistical, analytical approach to determine financial aid award levels by predicting enrollment rates based on award amounts (aka financial aid leveraging ) Outsourcing print or electronic campaigns for student search Outsourcing print or electronic campaigns to generate applications from the inquiry pool public CRM solution for managing and tracking recruitment communications, online applications, etc. Systematically contacting admitted students to code their level of interest in enrolling at your institution ( qualifying admits) Admissions tracking to monitor and predict students incremental rates of movement toward enrollment Search engine optimization process to improve organic search results Outsourcing print or electronic campaigns to generate applications from the inquiry pool Highlights from these rankings: Across both sectors, using a CRM solution to help manage and track communications again topped the list of internal operations for undergraduate marketing and student recruitment, similar to earlier studies. However, there was substantial variance between private and public on the other top-ranked practices. Boldface in this table indicates internal operations that were not being used by more than one-quarter of within the sector. Institutions not using these practices may want to consider using them. Please see the Appendix for details Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 6
7 HIGHLIGHTS Search practices highlights/initial outreach to high school students Highlighted below and on the following page is a small sampling of the undergraduate search practice findings of this study, all of which focus on high school students. Volume of high school students names purchased each year for use in direct mail or to generate inquiries and applicants Statistics private public 25th percentile volume of names purchased Median volume of names purchased 75th percentile volume of names purchased 30,000 37,500 65,000 75, , ,000 What the data show: Respondents from public reported purchasing a slightly higher volume of high school student names at the median compared to respondents from private Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 7
8 HIGHLIGHTS Most popular methods for making first contact with purchased names (Percentages indicate the proportion of using each method; respondents were instructed to Check all that apply. ) 70 % 60% 50% 57% 71% private public 40% 30% 20% 37% 33% 30% 37% 10% 0% message message with link to a personalized URL Self-mailer brochure What the data show: messages and self-mailer brochures again ranked highest on the list of preferred communication methods for both sectors for making first contact with purchased names. Few respondents reported using text messaging to make first contact please see the Appendix for details and note that only 1 percent of today s high school students prefer text messaging for the first contact. 2 More search highlights from the Appendix At the median, purchased names were the source of 24 percent of all high school student inquiries for private and 20 percent of all high school student inquiries for public. See the Appendix, pages 25 and percent of private institution respondents and 60 percent of public institution respondents reported sending the same communications as inquiries to a subset of purchased names of high school students. See the Appendix, pages 25 and Ruffalo Noel Levitz, (2015) high school students and parents perceptions of and preferences for communication with colleges. Cedar Rapids: Ruffalo Noel Levitz. Available at Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 8
9 HIGHLIGHTS Volume of written contacts by enrollment stage (direct mail, , and texting combined) private public Purchased name/pre-inquiry stage Inquiry stage Admit stage Deposit/Confirmed stage What the data show: The median number of written contacts that a typical prospective high school student received from a college or university over the course of an entire recruiting cycle (direct mail, , and texting combined) was 33 for private and 25 for public. Notice the volume of written contacts was highest during the inquiry and admit stages. Student-to-student contact programs Percent of respondents in agreement Survey item* private public Yes, we have a student-to-student contact program 69.6% 56.3% What the data show: Half to two-thirds of respondents reported using a student-to-student contact program, with a median, per-student volume of five or six contacts. Please see the Appendix for volume breakdowns by each type of contact (phone, , text, social media, and handwritten notes) and by sector. Definition *For this item, respondents were asked: Do you have a student-to-student contact program in which current students stay in touch with prospective students via phone, , text messages, social media such as Facebook, and/or personal, handwritten notes? 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 9
10 HIGHLIGHTS Planning and leadership practices highlights Despite the need for stronger planning and leadership in today s challenging environment, only about half of respondents from four-year indicated they had a committee to coordinate recruitment planning, and many respondents questioned the quality of their written plans for marketing and recruitment, as shown in the table below. private public Survey items My institution has a written annual recruitment plan My institution has a written annual marketing plan My institution has a written, long-range (at least three-year) strategic enrollment plan My institution has a standing, campuswide committee that addresses coordinated recruitment planning and implementation across all units Institutions using practice Excellent quality* Excellent or good quality* Institutions using practice Excellent quality* Excellent or good quality* 85.1% 15.5% 63.9% 81.6% 22.5% 60.0% 80.7% 12.0% 53.3% 75.0% 13.9% 50.0% 61.6% 11.6% 53.6% 61.2% 10.0% 43.3% 49.1% 14.3% 46.4% 57.1% 10.7% 35.7% Highlights from these rankings: Only about 10 percent of respondents gave an excellent rating to their strategic, multi-year enrollment plan, and nearly 40 percent indicated they didn t have one. Many respondents also gave low quality ratings to their committee for recruitment planning. *Quality ratings in this table were based on a four-part scale: Excellent quality, Good quality, Fair quality, or Poor quality. The ratings excluded those who indicated practice not used Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 10
11 HIGHLIGHTS Reporting responsibility for chief enrollment officers A range of practice across sectors was evident in the supervision of chief enrollment officers, as shown in the table below. Chief enrollment officer reports to private public President 76.5% 34.7% Academic Affairs 12.2% 22.4% Student Affairs 0.9% 26.5% Administrative/ Business Office 0.0% 0.0% Other* 10.4% 16.3% Highlights from these rankings: At private, a chief enrollment officer is more likely to report to the president, while at public, a chief enrollment officer is more likely to report to student affairs. *Other responses named by two or more respondents from private in a blank, open-ended field included executive vice president and provost. For public, dean was named by two respondents. The rest of the other responses were unique responses identified by only one respondent each Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 11
12 HIGHLIGHTS Plans in response to federal government s new FAFSA rules NEW! New in this year s study, respondents from four-year were asked: What marketing and recruitment changes, if any, are you planning to implement in response to the federal government s new FAFSA rules which allow use of Prior-Prior Year (PPY) information? (Please check all that apply.) Responses to seven checkbox-options appear below. responses to new FAFSA rules Adjust content and timing of communication flows to prospective students Provide financial aid estimates earlier Will be encouraging leadership to set tuition earlier We do not yet know what changes we will be making Consider an earlier deadline for filing the FAFSA private public 61.7% 71.4% 59.1% 51.0% 58.3% 28.6% 35.7% 42.9% 27.8% 14.3% Admit students earlier 23.5% 14.3% Other* 2.6% 4.1% * No two respondents indicated the same response. Highlights from these rankings: The majority of respondents across private and public indicated they will be adjusting their communication flows and providing earlier estimates of financial aid in response to the federal government s new FAFSA rules which allow use of Prior-Prior Year (PPY) information. In addition, many respondents will be working to set tuition earlier, and many were still formulating their response Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 12
13 Appendix with complete findings by sector The following tables include the complete findings of this study, divided and color-coded for each of the three sectors examined. Contents private Pages 14-27: Usage and Effectiveness of 10 Modes of Communication for Marketing and Recruitment 14 Usage and Effectiveness of 61 Strategies and Tactics 14 Usage and Effectiveness of 11 Event Marketing and Recruitment Practices 19 Usage and Effectiveness of 8 Advertising Practices 20 Usage and Effectiveness of 13 Internal Operations Practices 2 1 Search Practices and Initial Outreach to High School Students 23 Written Contacts, Student-to-Student Contact Programs 26 Planning and Leadership Practices 27 public Pages 28-41: Usage and Effectiveness of 10 Modes of Communication for Marketing and Recruitment 28 Usage and Effectiveness of 61 Strategies and Tactics 28 Usage and Effectiveness of 11 Event Marketing and Recruitment Practices 33 Usage and Effectiveness of 8 Advertising Practices 34 Usage and Effectiveness of 13 Internal Operations Practices 35 Search Practices and Initial Outreach to High School Students 37 Written Contacts, Student-to-Student Contact Programs 40 Planning and Leadership Practices Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 13
14 Usage and Effectiveness of 10 Specific Modes of Communication for Marketing and Student Recruitment at Four-Year Private Institutions Ordered by Percent Rated Very Effective private private Website optimized for mobile browsers Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 87.6% 43.4% 40.4% 16.2% 83.8% Text messaging 61.1% 34.8% 46.4% 18.8% 81.2% communication Recruiting page(s) on website 100.0% 31.0% 61.9% 7.1% 92.9% 99.1% 25.9% 56.3% 17.9% 82.1% Calling cell phones 95.6% 25.7% 57.8% 16.5% 83.5% Publications in general (viewbook, search piece, etc.) Videos embedded in campus website 93.8% 25.5% 54.7% 19.8% 80.2% 80.2% 19.1% 49.4% 31.5% 68.5% Calling home phones 98.2% 9.9% 39.6% 50.5% 49.5% Video calls using Skype or similar services Social media sites like Facebook or Twitter 31.3% 8.6% 37.1% 54.3% 45.7% 98.2% 8.0% 44.6% 47.3% 52.7% Usage and Effectiveness of 61 Strategies and Tactics for Marketing and Student Recruitment at Four-Year Private Institutions Ordered by Percent Rated Very Effective Rankings of Strategies and Tactics private Campus open house events Overnight visits for high school students Campus visit days for high school students Encouraging prospective students to apply on the admissions website A planned, sequential flow of communication to prospective students, from the beginning to the end of the recruiting cycle Encouraging prospective students to schedule campus visits on the admissions website Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 97.3% 61.7% 32.7% 5.6% 94.4% 64.9% 58.3% 27.8% 13.9% 86.1% 91.9% 56.9% 35.3% 7.8% 92.2% 98.2% 49.1% 42.6% 8.3% 91.7% 95.5% 47.6% 45.7% 6.7% 93.3% 92.7% 46.5% 44.6% 8.9% 91.1% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 14
15 Rankings of Strategies and Tactics, Continued private private High school visits by admission representatives to primary markets Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 96.4% 40.6% 41.5% 17.9% 82.1% Weekend visit days 76.6% 31.8% 48.2% 20.0% 80.0% Targeting in-state students College-paid trips to campus for prospective students Direct marketing aimed at eliciting specific, measurable actions such as a campus visit or submission of an application Routine contacts by admissions office professional staff to assess student reactions to financial aid awards Admissions decisions on the spot in high schools or during campus visits/open houses Campus visit events designed for school counselors 91.8% 29.7% 57.4% 12.9% 87.1% 33.3% 29.7% 37.8% 32.4% 67.6% 90.9% 29.0% 50.0% 21.0% 79.0% 84.4% 28.3% 51.1% 20.7% 79.3% 29.6% 28.1% 46.9% 25.0% 75.0% 70.0% 27.3% 41.6% 31.2% 68.8% Student-to-student telecounseling involving continuous, regularly scheduled flows of phone calls at a high volume (one-time phonathons don t count) 66.1% 26.4% 43.1% 30.6% 69.4% Student search via 91.9% 23.5% 50.0% 26.5% 73.5% Off-campus group meetings for prospective students and/or their parents 76.4% 22.6% 48.8% 28.6% 71.4% Meetings or events for high school counselors 67.0% 21.9% 43.8% 34.2% 65.8% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 15
16 Rankings of Strategies and Tactics, Continued private private Routine contacts by financial aid office professional staff to assess student reactions to financial aid awards Community college articulation agreements Content marketing to attract students using informative subjects, topics, and informational resources Academic programs within high schools for students to earn college credits to your institution Special interest workshops, seminars, or camps (music, sports, science, etc.) Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 41.8% 21.7% 43.5% 34.8% 65.2% 79.3% 20.5% 40.9% 38.6% 61.4% 64.8% 18.6% 45.7% 35.7% 64.3% 50.5% 18.5% 27.8% 53.7% 46.3% 77.3% 17.6% 40.0% 42.4% 57.6% Targeting out-ofstate students 79.1% 17.2% 50.6% 32.2% 67.8% Student search via direct mail 86.5% 16.7% 42.7% 40.6% 59.4% Community college outreach to academic advisors 79.3% 15.9% 45.5% 38.6% 61.4% Targeting parents of prospective students 76.1% 15.7% 49.4% 34.9% 65.1% Pay-per-click ads on search sites like Google, Bing, or Yahoo Targeting highacademic-ability students 71.3% 15.6% 35.1% 49.4% 50.6% 85.3% 15.1% 60.2% 24.7% 75.3% Offering flexible payment plans 73.4% 15.0% 43.8% 41.3% 58.8% High school visits by admission representatives to secondary, tertiary, or test markets Cookie-driven retargeting ads that target users who ve previously visited your website 85.5% 14.9% 36.2% 48.9% 51.1% 61.8% 14.7% 39.7% 45.6% 54.4% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 16
17 Rankings of Strategies and Tactics, Continued private private Faculty phone contacts with prospective students Encouraging prospective students to use an inquiry form on the admissions website Having enrolled students visit one or more high schools Targeting international students Cooperative or consortia-based recruiting Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 74.8% 14.5% 41.0% 44.6% 55.4% 94.6% 14.3% 54.3% 31.4% 68.6% 40.0% 13.6% 40.9% 45.5% 54.5% 74.3% 13.6% 37.0% 49.4% 50.6% 40.4% 13.6% 18.2% 68.2% 31.8% Virtual tours 47.7% 13.5% 46.2% 40.4% 59.6% Community college visits 93.7% 13.5% 43.3% 43.3% 56.7% Sending a subset of purchased names the same communications as inquiries 52.7% 12.1% 39.7% 48.3% 51.7% Targeting adult learners 45.5% 12.0% 50.0% 38.0% 62.0% Using alumni in recruitment/ marketing 69.4% 11.7% 31.2% 57.1% 42.9% National or regional college fairs 97.3% 11.1% 51.9% 37.0% 63.0% Pay-per-click ads on Facebook or other social media sites 73.9% 11.0% 39.0% 50.0% 50.0% Targeting underrepresented students 76.1% 10.8% 48.2% 41.0% 59.0% Offering loans directly from the college or university 17.4% 10.5% 52.6% 36.8% 63.2% Online display advertising 86.4% 10.5% 50.5% 38.9% 61.1% Television ads 39.6% 9.1% 45.5% 45.5% 54.5% Targeting transfer students 91.9% 8.8% 44.1% 47.1% 52.9% Asking current students/alumni for applicant referrals 75.5% 8.4% 21.7% 69.9% 30.1% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 17
18 Rankings of Strategies and Tactics, Continued private private Personalized home page/portal for prospective students Targeting online learners Recruiting through business/industry Online net price calculator Targeting part-time students Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 43.6% 8.3% 54.2% 37.5% 62.5% 36.9% 7.3% 39.0% 53.7% 46.3% 39.4% 7.0% 25.6% 67.4% 32.6% 95.5% 6.7% 31.4% 61.9% 38.1% 30.6% 5.9% 26.5% 67.6% 32.4% Online college fairs 20.7% 4.3% 8.7% 87.0% 13.0% Radio ads 71.6% 3.8% 38.5% 57.7% 42.3% Billboard, bus, or other outdoor advertising 56.4% 3.2% 43.5% 53.2% 46.8% Print media ads in general 91.9% 2.0% 35.3% 62.7% 37.3% Targeting veterans Mailing course schedules to residents in area 55.0% 0.0% 31.1% 68.9% 31.1% 9.0% 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 10.0% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 18
19 Usage and Effectiveness of 11 Event Marketing and Recruitment Practices at Four-Year Private Institutions Ordered by Percent Rated Very Effective This data is a subset of the data presented in the previous, 61-item table. private private Campus open house events Overnight visits for high school students Campus visit days for high school students Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 97.3% 61.7% 32.7% 5.6% 94.4% 64.9% 58.3% 27.8% 13.9% 86.1% 91.9% 56.9% 35.3% 7.8% 92.2% Weekend visit days 76.6% 31.8% 48.2% 20.0% 80.0% College-paid trips to campus for prospective students Campus visit events designed for school counselors Off-campus group meetings for prospective students and/or their parents Meetings or events for high school counselors Special interest workshops, seminars, or camps (music, sports, science, etc.) 33.3% 29.7% 37.8% 32.4% 67.6% 70.0% 27.3% 41.6% 31.2% 68.8% 76.4% 22.6% 48.8% 28.6% 71.4% 67.0% 21.9% 43.8% 34.2% 65.8% 77.3% 17.6% 40.0% 42.4% 57.6% National or regional college fairs 97.3% 11.1% 51.9% 37.0% 63.0% Online college fairs 20.7% 4.3% 8.7% 87.0% 13.0% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 19
20 Usage and Effectiveness of 8 Advertising Practices at Four-Year Private Institutions Ordered by Percent Rated Very Effective This data is a subset of the data presented in the previous, 61-item table. private private Pay-per-click ads on search sites like Google, Bing, or Yahoo Cookie-driven retargeting ads that target users who ve previously visited your website Pay-per-click ads on Facebook or other social media sites Online display advertising Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 71.3% 15.6% 35.1% 49.4% 50.6% 61.8% 14.7% 39.7% 45.6% 54.4% 73.9% 11.0% 39.0% 50.0% 50.0% 86.4% 10.5% 50.5% 38.9% 61.1% Television ads 39.6% 9.1% 45.5% 45.5% 54.5% Radio ads 71.6% 3.8% 38.5% 57.7% 42.3% Billboard, bus, or other outdoor advertising 56.4% 3.2% 43.5% 53.2% 46.8% Print media ads in general 91.9% 2.0% 35.3% 62.7% 37.3% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 20
21 Usage and Effectiveness of 13 Internal Operations Practices at Four-Year Private Institutions Ordered by Percent Rated Very Effective private private CRM solution for managing and tracking recruitment communications, online applications, etc. Outsourcing telephone qualification to rate the interest levels of prospective students by phone Using a statistical, analytical approach to determine financial aid award levels by predicting enrollment rates based on award amounts (aka financial aid leveraging ) Outsourcing print or electronic campaigns for student search Outsourcing print or electronic campaigns to generate applications from the inquiry pool Systematically contacting admitted students to code their level of interest in enrolling at your institution ("qualifying" admits) Statistical modeling to predict the likelihood of a prospective student enrolling at your institution Admissions tracking to monitor and predict students incremental rates of movement toward enrollment Systematically contacting inquiries to code their level of interest in enrolling at your institution ("qualifying inquiries") Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 72.2% 48.7% 28.2% 23.1% 76.9% 25.7% 46.4% 10.7% 42.9% 57.1% 78.9% 45.3% 38.4% 16.3% 83.7% 65.7% 42.3% 35.2% 22.5% 77.5% 49.5% 41.5% 30.2% 28.3% 71.7% 74.1% 41.3% 40.0% 18.8% 81.3% 72.5% 40.5% 34.2% 25.3% 74.7% 78.7% 37.6% 40.0% 22.4% 77.6% 69.4% 34.7% 34.7% 30.7% 69.3% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 21
22 Rankings of Internal Operations, Continued private private Outsourcing market research (lost applicant analysis, brand perceptions, pricing analysis, SEO, etc.) Search engine optimization process to improve organic search results Analytics resources such as Google Analytics to provide data for decision making (search engine optimization, finetuning recruitment/ admissions portion of the website, etc.) Outsourcing international recruitment Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 49.5% 22.6% 39.6% 37.7% 62.3% 81.7% 20.2% 49.4% 30.3% 69.7% 91.7% 19.0% 51.0% 30.0% 70.0% 19.4% 9.5% 28.6% 61.9% 38.1% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 22
23 Search Practices at Four-Year Private Institutions Approximate Number of High School Student Names Purchased private private Approximate number of high school student names purchased for use in direct mail or to generate inquiries and applicants First quartile Median Third quartile 30,000 65, ,000 Approximate Number of High School Student Names Purchased (Subset of Above) Who Receive Only private Approximate number of high school student names purchased who receive only First quartile Median Third quartile 16,250 40,000 75,000 Timing of Contact with Purchased High School Names by Vendor Respondents were instructed to check all that apply. private NRCCUA names PSAT names SAT names PLAN names ACT names Other vendors* Prior to grade % 5.2% 5.2% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% Sophomore year 40.2% 40.2% 40.2% 27.8% 23.7% 16.5% Junior year 62.9% 46.4% 52.6% 28.9% 63.9% 29.0% Summer prior to senior year 52.6% 21.6% 53.6% 17.5% 61.9% 28.9% Fall of senior year 51.5% 14.4% 63.9% 13.4% 67.0% 32.0% Winter or later of senior year 25.8% 5.2% 32.0% 2.1% 40.2% 19.6% * Other vendors specified by two or more respondents included: Cappex, CBSS, Christian Connector, Chegg, and CollegeFish Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 23
24 private Respondents Who Reported Using Purchased High School Student Names from Three or More of the Five Sources Named (Based on data from the previous table Timing of contact. ) For example, 50.5 percent of respondents who purchased names of high school juniors acquired the names from three or more of the five name sources listed on the previous page: NRCCUA, PSAT, SAT, PLAN, and ACT. private Percent Prior to grade % Sophomore year 28.9% Junior year 50.5% Summer prior to senior year 41.2% Fall of senior year 40.2% Winter or later of senior year 15.5% Respondents Who Reported Contacting Purchased Names Three or More Times From Each of the Name Sources Examined (Based on data from the previous table Timing of contact. ) For example, 52.6 percent of respondents reported contacting NRCCUA names three or more times. private Percent NRCCUA names 52.6% PSAT names 24.7% SAT names 54.6% PLAN names 19.6% ACT names 55.7% Other vendors 10.3% Preferred Methods for First and Subsequent Contacts with High School Purchased Names Ordered by Preferred First Contact Respondents were instructed to check all that apply. private First contact with purchased names of high school students Subsequent contact(s) with non-responding purchased names before giving up on them message 57.4% 78.3% message with link to a personalized URL 36.5% 35.7% Self-mailer brochure 30.4% 19.1% Outbound phone call to all or selected contacts 20.0% 27.8% Letter 19.1% 13.9% Letter sent with enclosed brochure 17.4% 17.4% Letter sent with viewbook 12.2% 4.3% Other* 8.7% 7.8% Viewbook 6.1% 10.4% Catalog 0.9% 2.6% Text message 0.0% 7.8% *The vast majority of those who selected other (7.8 percent) listed postcards Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 24
25 Typical Number of Additional Contacts Made (Subsequent to the First Contact) With Purchased High School Names Before Giving Up on Them Reported Separately for vs. Mail vs. Phone private private Approximate number of additional contacts Approximate number of additional mail contacts Approximate number of additional phone contacts First quartile Median Third quartile Do You Send a Subset of Purchased Names the Same Communications as Inquiries? private Percent Percent Yes 55.3% Approximate Percentage of High School Student Inquiries By Source Ordered by Median Response private First quartile Median Third quartile Purchased names 10.0% 23.5% 46.0% Other sources* 6.0% 13.0% 29.0% Travel to high schools and college fairs 8.8% 11.5% 20.0% Website/Web form 5.0% 10.0% 20.0% Application as first contact 5.0% 8.0% 15.0% Test scores 3.0% 5.0% 10.0% Campus visits 3.0% 5.0% 10.0% Referrals 1.0% 5.0% 10.0% Paid online ads 0.0% 2.0% 10.0% *Other sources named by two or more respondents in a blank, open-ended field included transcripts, phone calls, coaches, denominational events/affiliation, and these organizations: FAFSA/ISIR, Cappex, Hobsons, Chegg, PC&U Private Colleges & Universities, CollegeXpress, Student Paths, and Petersons Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 25
26 Written Contacts at Four-Year Private Institutions Number of Written Communications a Typical Prospective Student Receives from Marketing and Recruitment Offices by Stages (Combination of direct mail, , and texting) private Statistics Purchased name/ Prospect stage Inquiry stage Admit stage Deposit/confirmed stage First quartile Median Third quartile Student-to-Student Contact Programs at Four-Year Private Institutions Do You Have a Student-to-Student Contact Program? (Yes/No) private Percent Percent Yes 69.6% Volume of Student-to-Student Contacts for Campuses That Responded Yes to Previous Item Reported Separately for Phone vs. vs. Text vs. Social Media vs. Handwritten Notes Statistics Phone Text Social media Handwritten notes First quartile Median Third quartile Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 26
27 Planning and Leadership Practices at Four-Year Private Institutions Quality Ratings for Six Leadership Practices Ordered by Percent Rated Excellent Quality private private Regular evaluations of marketing and recruitment strategies and tactics, including making changes accordingly Institutions using practice Excellent quality Good quality Fair quality Poor quality Excellent or good quality 95.6% 24.8% 45.9% 24.8% 4.6% 70.6% Written annual recruitment plan 85.1% 15.5% 48.5% 30.9% 5.2% 63.9% Written annual integrated recruitment/marketing plan Standing, campuswide committee that addresses coordinated marketing and recruitment planning across all units 68.1% 14.3% 33.8% 41.6% 10.4% 48.1% 49.1% 14.3% 32.1% 37.5% 16.1% 46.4% Written annual marketing plan 80.7% 12.0% 41.3% 35.9% 10.9% 53.3% Written, long-range (at least three year) strategic enrollment plan 61.6% 11.6% 42.0% 30.4% 15.9% 53.6% Chief Enrollment Officer Reports to Which Office? Respondents were instructed to choose only one response from the response below. private Percent President 76.5% Academic Affairs 12.2% Other* 10.4% Student Affairs 0.9% Administrative/Business Office 0.0% *Other responses named by two or more respondents in a blank, open-ended field included provost and executive vice president. All the rest of the other responses were unique responses identified by only one respondent each. Plans in Response to Federal Government s New FAFSA Rules Respondents were asked: What marketing and recruitment changes, if any, are you planning to implement in response to federal government s new FAFSA rules which allow use of Prior-Prior Year (PPY) information? (Please check all that apply.) private Percent Adjust content and timing of communication flows to prospective students 61.7% Provide financial aid estimates earlier 59.1% Will be encouraging leadership to set tuition earlier 58.3% We do not yet know what changes we will be making 35.7% Consider an earlier deadline for filing the FAFSA 27.8% Admit students earlier 23.5% Other* 2.6% *Each respondent who selected Other was presented with a blank field in which to specify additional initiatives. However, no two respondents indicated the same response Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 27
28 Usage and Effectiveness of 10 Specific Modes of Communication for Marketing and Student Recruitment at Four-Year Public Institutions Ordered by Percent Rated Very Effective public public Website optimized for mobile browsers communication Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 83.3% 37.5% 45.0% 17.5% 82.5% 97.9% 27.7% 59.6% 12.8% 87.2% Text messaging 31.3% 26.7% 53.3% 20.0% 80.0% Recruiting page(s) on website Publications in general (viewbook, search piece, etc.) 95.8% 26.1% 45.7% 28.3% 71.7% 100.0% 22.9% 62.5% 14.6% 85.4% Calling cell phones 85.4% 19.5% 48.8% 31.7% 68.3% Videos embedded in campus website Social media sites like Facebook or Twitter 87.5% 11.9% 52.4% 35.7% 64.3% 89.6% 11.6% 48.8% 39.5% 60.5% Calling home phones 95.8% 10.9% 47.8% 41.3% 58.7% Video calls using Skype or similar services 31.3% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 33.3% Usage and Effectiveness of 61 Strategies and Tactics for Marketing and Student Recruitment at Four-Year Public Institutions Ordered by Percent Rated Very Effective Rankings of Strategies and Tactics public Campus open house events Campus visit days for high school students Meetings or events for high school counselors Encouraging prospective students to apply on the admissions website Campus visit events designed for school counselors Encouraging prospective students to schedule campus visits on the admissions website Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 95.8% 76.1% 21.7% 2.2% 97.8% 97.9% 51.1% 44.7% 4.3% 95.7% 83.3% 45.0% 32.5% 22.5% 77.5% 100.0% 41.7% 50.0% 8.3% 91.7% 68.8% 39.4% 39.4% 21.2% 78.8% 95.8% 39.1% 52.2% 8.7% 91.3% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 28
29 Rankings of Strategies and Tactics, Continued public public Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat Weekend visit days 77.1% 37.8% 54.1% 8.1% 91.9% Community college visits A planned, sequential flow of communication to prospective students, from the beginning to the end of the recruiting cycle High school visits by admission representatives to primary markets Community college articulation agreements 95.7% 33.3% 51.1% 15.6% 84.4% 95.8% 32.6% 56.5% 10.9% 89.1% 100.0% 31.3% 60.4% 8.3% 91.7% 91.3% 31.0% 50.0% 19.0% 81.0% Targeting in-state students 100.0% 29.2% 56.3% 14.6% 85.4% Community college outreach to academic advisors Academic programs within high schools for students to earn college credits to your institution Admissions decisions on the spot in high schools or during campus visits/open houses Off-campus group meetings for prospective students and/or their parents 89.4% 28.6% 47.6% 23.8% 76.2% 77.1% 27.0% 35.1% 37.8% 62.2% 41.7% 25.0% 40.0% 35.0% 65.0% 75.0% 25.0% 58.3% 16.7% 83.3% Having enrolled students visit one or more high schools 44.7% 19.0% 33.3% 47.6% 52.4% Online display advertising 69.6% 18.8% 53.1% 28.1% 71.9% College-paid trips to campus for prospective students 37.5% 16.7% 50.0% 33.3% 66.7% Targeting transfer students 91.7% 15.9% 63.6% 20.5% 79.5% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 29
30 Rankings of Strategies and Tactics, Continued public public Student-to-student telecounseling involving continuous, regularly scheduled flows of phone calls at a high volume (one-time phonathons don t count) Content marketing to attract students using informative subjects, topics, and informational resources Targeting out-ofstate students Direct marketing aimed at eliciting specific, measurable actions such as a campus visit or submission of an application Targeting parents of prospective students Routine contacts by financial aid office professional staff to assess student reactions to financial aid awards Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 54.2% 15.4% 69.2% 15.4% 84.6% 68.8% 15.2% 54.5% 30.3% 69.7% 85.4% 14.6% 53.7% 31.7% 68.3% 85.4% 14.6% 56.1% 29.3% 70.7% 75.0% 13.9% 47.2% 38.9% 61.1% 31.9% 13.3% 46.7% 40.0% 60.0% Offering flexible payment plans 66.0% 12.9% 35.5% 51.6% 48.4% High school visits by admission representatives to secondary, tertiary, or test markets Routine contacts by admissions office professional staff to assess student reactions to financial aid awards 97.9% 12.8% 46.8% 40.4% 59.6% 33.3% 12.5% 62.5% 25.0% 75.0% Targeting underrepresented students 85.4% 12.2% 61.0% 26.8% 73.2% Student search via 87.5% 11.9% 52.4% 35.7% 64.3% Targeting highacademic ability students 93.8% 11.1% 55.6% 33.3% 66.7% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 30
31 Rankings of Strategies and Tactics, Continued public public Personalized home page/portal for prospective students Targeting online learners Cookie-driven retargeting ads that target users who ve previously visited your website Encouraging prospective students to use an inquiry form on the admissions website Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 41.7% 10.0% 55.0% 35.0% 65.0% 42.6% 10.0% 45.0% 45.0% 55.0% 43.5% 10.0% 45.0% 45.0% 55.0% 91.7% 9.1% 54.5% 36.4% 63.6% Television ads 47.8% 9.1% 40.9% 50.0% 50.0% Targeting international students 70.2% 9.1% 30.3% 60.6% 39.4% National or regional college fairs 95.8% 8.7% 58.7% 32.6% 67.4% Student search via direct mail 85.4% 7.3% 48.8% 43.9% 56.1% Sending a subset of purchased names the same communications as inquiries 62.5% 6.7% 56.7% 36.7% 63.3% Virtual tours 62.5% 6.7% 56.7% 36.7% 63.3% Faculty phone contacts with prospective students Targeting veterans Using alumni in recruiting/marketing Special interest workshops, seminars, or camps (music, sports, science, etc.) Recruiting through business/industry Asking current students/alumni for applicant referrals Pay-per-click ads on search sites like Google, Bing, or Yahoo 63.8% 6.7% 43.3% 50.0% 50.0% 63.8% 6.7% 40.0% 53.3% 46.7% 64.6% 6.5% 41.9% 51.6% 48.4% 75.0% 5.6% 55.6% 38.9% 61.1% 39.6% 5.3% 10.5% 84.2% 15.8% 48.9% 4.3% 8.7% 87.0% 13.0% 52.2% 4.2% 41.7% 54.2% 45.8% 2016 Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 31
32 Rankings of Strategies and Tactics, Continued public public Pay-per-click ads on Facebook or other social media sites Online net price calculator Print media ads in general Mailing course schedules to residents in the area Billboard, bus, or other outdoor advertising Cooperative or consortia-based recruiting Radio ads Targeting adult learners Online college fairs Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 56.5% 3.8% 53.8% 42.3% 57.7% 81.3% 2.6% 38.5% 59.0% 41.0% 87.0% 2.5% 37.5% 60.0% 40.0% 16.7% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 76.1% 0.0% 34.3% 65.7% 34.3% 37.5% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 33.3% 65.2% 0.0% 30.0% 70.0% 30.0% 41.7% 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 20.0% 52.1% 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 20.0% Targeting part-time students 29.8% NA NA NA NA Overnight visits for high school students 27.1% NA NA NA NA Offering loans directly from the college or university 18.8% NA NA NA NA NA notation: Please note that ness ratings are unavailable (shown as NA ) in cases where the number of respondents was too small to provide statistically significant findings Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 32
33 Usage and Effectiveness of 11 Event Marketing and Recruitment Practices at Four-Year Public Institutions Ordered by Percent Rated Very Effective This data is a subset of the data presented in the previous, 61-item table. public public Campus open house events Campus visit days for high school students Meetings or events for high school counselors Campus visit events designed for school counselors Institutions using practice Very Somewhat Minimally Very or somewhat 95.8% 76.1% 21.7% 2.2% 97.8% 97.9% 51.1% 44.7% 4.3% 95.7% 83.3% 45.0% 32.5% 22.5% 77.5% 68.8% 39.4% 39.4% 21.2% 78.8% Weekend visit days 77.1% 37.8% 54.1% 8.1% 91.9% Off-campus group meetings for prospective students and/or their parents 75.0% 25.0% 58.3% 16.7% 83.3% College-paid trips to campus for prospective students National or regional college fairs Special interest workshops, seminars, or camps (music, sports, science, etc.) 37.5% 16.7% 50.0% 33.3% 66.7% 95.8% 8.7% 58.7% 32.6% 67.4% 75.0% 5.6% 55.6% 38.9% 61.1% Online college fairs 52.1% 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 20.0% Overnight visits for high school students 27.1% NA NA NA NA NA notation: Please note that ness ratings are unavailable (shown as NA ) in cases where the number of respondents was too small to provide statistically significant findings Ruffalo Noel Levitz 2016 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report 33
2013 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report for Four-
Noel-Levitz Report on Undergraduate Trends in Enrollment Management 2013 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report for Four- Year and Two-Year What s working in student recruitment and
More information2011 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices at Four-
Noel-Levitz Report on Undergraduate Trends in Enrollment Management 2011 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices at Four- Year and Two-Year Institutions What s working in student recruitment and marketing
More informationfor Undergraduate and Graduate Programs
Trends in Enrollment Management 2015 Adult Learner Marketing and Recruitment Practices Benchmark Report for Undergraduate and Graduate Programs What s working in adult learner recruitment and marketing
More information2013 Student Retention and College Completion Practices Report for Four-Year
Noel-Levitz Report on Undergraduate Trends in Enrollment Management 2013 Student Retention and College Completion Practices Report for Four-Year and Two-Year What s working to increase student retention
More information2012 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices for
Trends in Enrollment Management 2012 Marketing and Student Recruitment Practices for Master s-level Graduate Programs What s working in the area of marketing and recruiting for master s-level graduate
More informationThe E-expectations of College-Bound High School Juniors and Seniors
The E-expectations of College-Bound High School Juniors and Seniors Stephanie Geyer Associate Vice President for Web Strategy and Interactive Marketing Services Warning: Data Overload Imminent! E-Expectations
More information2011 Student Retention Practices at Four-Year and
Noel-Levitz Report on Undergraduate Trends in Enrollment Management 2011 Student Retention Practices at Four-Year and Two-Year Institutions What s working in student retention at the undergraduate level?
More informationTransfer Access Self-Assessment Inventory: Four-Year College Version
Attachment #3 Transfer Access Self-Assessment Inventory: Four-Year College Version Names of Individuals completing the inventory: Name Title Email College Name Title Email College Name Title Email College
More informationProposed Committee Action No Action Required Information Only. Background Information. Integrated Marketing Budget Year-End Summary
AGENDA ITEM: VI B Florida Polytechnic University Board of Trustees Strategic Planning Committee June 2, 2014 Subject: Integrated Marketing Year-End Review Proposed Committee Action No Action Required Information
More information2015 Research Report RISING SENIORS PERCEPTIONS OF FINANCIAL AID
SM 2015 Research Report RISING SENIORS PERCEPTIONS OF FINANCIAL AID An analysis of how college-bound seniors and their families view a variety of topics related to financing higher education This national
More informationThe Online Expectations of College-Bound Juniors and Seniors
2012 E-Expectations Report The Online Expectations of College-Bound Juniors and Seniors A look at their behavior and expectations regarding college Web sites, e-communications, social media, and more Noel-Levitz,
More informationUsing New Knowledge to Build a Better Strategy: Insightful New Research and Christian College Marketing
Using New Knowledge to Build a Better Strategy: Insightful New Research and Christian College Marketing Dave Burke, Azusa Pacific University Matt Osborne, Spring Arbor University Richard Whiteside, Ph.D.,
More informationHow To Get Your Child To Choose College
Engaging Parents: Possibly Your Best Recruitment Strategy Presented by Ian Watt Strategic Leader Royall & Company Achieve success year after year Today s Presentation Opportunity Statement Overview of
More information2014 E-Expectations Report The Online Preferences of College-Bound High School Seniors and Their Parents
2014 E-Expectations Report The Online Preferences of College-Bound High School Seniors and Their Parents For many college-bound high school students, the decision about where to go to college is not theirs
More informationKimberley Buster-Williams Feb. 25, 2014. Enrollment Management: Challenges Brilliantly Disguised
Kimberley Buster-Williams Feb. 25, 2014 Enrollment Management: Challenges Brilliantly Disguised We are continually faced by great opportunities brilliantly disguised as insoluble problems. Lee Iacocca
More informationE-Expectations 2010 Focusing Your E-Recruitment Efforts to Meet the Expectations of College-Bound Students Sponsored by
E-Expectations 2010 Focusing Your E-Recruitment Efforts to Meet the Expectations of College-Bound Students With every passing school year, the online demands of prospective college students seem to grow
More information2015 E-Expectations Report
2015 E-Expectations Report What 10 Years of Research Has Told Us About College E-Recruitment In 2005, the first E-Expectations study examined the online expectations of 1,000 collegebound juniors. At that
More informationE15: Engage Parents for More Engaged Students: Communication Strategies for Enrollment Managers
E15: Engage Parents for More Engaged Students: Communication Strategies for Enrollment Managers Tom Willoughby, University of Denver Madeleine Rhyneer, Albion College Pamela Kiecker Royall, Royall & Company
More informationTechnical/trade school, two-year, or four-year college? Public (state) or private college? Liberal arts or technical college?
Grade 11 Keep Rising What Does My Ideal College Look Like? By now, you may be certain that you want to attend college. But how do you learn more about different colleges? There are many factors to consider
More informationStudents College Preferences and Plans in the 2011 Admissions Cycle Results from the 2011 College Decision Impact Survey
Students College Preferences and Plans in the 2011 Admissions Cycle Results from the 2011 College Decision Impact Survey March 2011 Our Partner: 1 Introduction In January 2011, surveys were collected from
More information15 to Finish. The Benefits to Students and Institutions. Leading the Way: Access, Success, Impact
15 to Finish The Benefits to Students and Institutions Leading the Way: Access, Success, Impact March 31, 2014 Access Impact Success Less than half of the students who enroll in West Virginia s four-year
More informationPROVING THE VALUE OF DIGITAL MARKETING in Higher Education
BEST PRACTICES GUIDE PROVING THE VALUE OF DIGITAL MARKETING in Higher Education HOW DATA-DRIVEN DIGITAL MARKETING DELIVERS oho.com 617 499 4900 @ohointeractive The Case for Data The future of education
More informationProving The Value of Digital Marketing In Higher Education
Best Practices Guide Proving The Value of Digital Marketing In Higher Education How Data-Driven Digital Marketing Delivers oho.com 617 499 4900 @ohointeractive The future of education is data driven, says
More informationBuilding an E-Recruitment Network Connecting With College-Bound Seniors in the Era of MySpace
Building an E-Recruitment Network Connecting With College-Bound Seniors in the Era of MySpace The growing influence of the Internet on recruitment has flattened the traditional funnel. Students are turning
More informationThe campus visit: Evaluating your options
The Campus Visit The campus visit: Evaluating your options Choosing a college is a big decision. You have many options, and making the best choice can have a positive influence on your life for years to
More informationEmail Me, Text Me, Facebook Me:
American Marketing Association 2010 Symposium for the Marketing of Higher Education Email Me, Text Me, Facebook Me: Mobile and Social Communication Preferences in the Neomillennial College Search Presented
More informationAdmissions Directors
The 2011 Inside Higher Ed Survey of College &University Admissions Directors 011 Kenneth C. Green senior Research Consultant with Scott Jaschik & Doug Lederman Founding Editors, Inside Higher Ed Support
More informationCollege Planning Timeline
College Planning Timeline 9 th Grade - 12 th Grade Planning for Students and Parents Report by Stan Ezekiel, Founder and President: Join us on Facebook Visit our Website 1 Contents (click on the links
More informationHow do US Universities Manage and Succeed in the Recruitment of Students?
How do US Universities Manage and Succeed in the Recruitment of Students? Manuel R. Luján Vice President for Enrollment Management at Texas A&M University Kingsville Introduction SW&Services for Higher
More informationDancing with the Students!
Dancing with the Students! What makes us better dance partners the successes and missteps that helped us build stronger recruitment programs PCACAC/SACAC Joint Conference April 23, 2012 Jennifer Winn Moderator
More information4/1/2014. 2014 UPCEA CONFERENCE Applications for MSU Outreach. Ross, Jaime M
4/1/2014 2014 UPCEA CONFERENCE Applications for MSU Outreach Ross, Jaime M 2014 UPCEA CONFERENCE Applications for MSU Outreach Measuring Career Success of Adult Learners Ensuring and measuring the career
More information20,000 by 2020 8/25/2015. UMKC s strategy: 20,000 by 2020. Who are we trying to reach? And what do we know about what they want?
UMKC s strategy: 20,000 by 2020 Everything we do is rooted in UMKC Strategic Plan 20,000 by 2020 Marketing s role in recruiting and retaining undergrad students By 2020 we will grow enrollment to 20,000
More informationAdvanced Degrees of E-Recruitment The E-Expectations of Prospective Graduate Students
GRADUATE EDITION Advanced Degrees of E-Recruitment The E-Expectations of Prospective Graduate Students Many university e-recruitment programs are built around enrolling undergraduates, but what about students
More informationRECRUITING TRANSFER STUDENTS FOR RETENTION AT FOUR YEAR INSTITUTIONS. Ryan D. Wagoner
RECRUITING TRANSFER STUDENTS FOR RETENTION AT FOUR YEAR INSTITUTIONS Ryan D. Wagoner Agenda Transfer Numbers Transfer Operations Recruitment Plan Communication Plan Retention Efforts Future Direction Discussion
More informationLeveraging Financial Aid Programs to Increase Student Recruitment and Retention
STUDENT AFFAIRS LEADERSHIP COUNCIL Leveraging Financial Aid Programs to Increase Student Recruitment and Retention Custom Research Brief Research Associate Nalika Vasudevan Research Manager Priya Kumar
More informationResults. 12. The Graduate School is responsive to my requests. 1.87 N = 335
Graduate School Student Survey The Graduate School State University of West Georgia Fall Semester 1998 prepared by, Jack O. Jenkins Ph.D. and Cheryl Thomas, M.Ed. The Graduate School Office at the State
More informationNavigating Toward E-Recruitment Ten Revelations About Interacting With College-Bound High School Students
TM Navigating Toward E-Recruitment Ten Revelations About Interacting With College-Bound High School Students They re out there. Looking at your Web site, making instant decisions about whether to remain
More informationBest Practices for Graduate Recruitment and Admissions. Carlos V. Grijalva Associate Dean UCLA Graduate Division
Diversifying if i Graduate Programs: Best Practices for Graduate Recruitment and Admissions Carlos V. Grijalva Associate Dean UCLA Graduate Division The Importance of Diversity in Higher Education Growing
More informationAthabasca University Management Position Description Section I
Athabasca University Management Position Description Section I Position Information Update Only Classification Review Position Title Position # Department Classification Level Reports to Effective Date
More informationResources for Foundations Workshop: Basics of Effective U.S. International Admissions. Armchair Recruiting
Resources for Foundations Workshop: Basics of Effective U.S. International Admissions Establish a Budget Armchair Recruiting Get the support of your boss Additional staffing to respond to inquiries Mailings
More information2014 RISING SENIORS PERCEPTIONS OF FINANCIAL AID
2014 RISING SENIORS PERCEPTIONS OF FINANCIAL AID RUFFALOCODY ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT DR. RAQUEL BERMEJO, DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH TM 65 Kirkwood North Road SW Cedar Rapids, IA 52406 800.756.7483 www.ruffalocody.com/em
More informationThe Impact of Mobile Browsing on the College Search Process
2013 E-Expectations Report The Impact of Mobile Browsing on the College Search Process The explosion of smartphones and tablets has given consumers access to the Internet from nearly any location. These
More informationEncouraging Faculty Participation in Student Recruitment
Academic Affairs Forum Encouraging Faculty Participation in Student Recruitment Custom Research Brief eab.com Academic Affairs Forum Noorjahan Rahman Research Associate 202-266-6461 NRahman@eab.com Kevin
More informationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FROM AGENTS AND COUNSELORS 1. How do I become an Agent for the University of Southern Maine? Please send a detailed e-mail to the Kimberly Sinclair,
More informationParents of Freshmen. College Placement Agenda for 9 th Graders: Attend College Previews in Dallas.
College Placement Agenda for 9 th Graders: Attend College Previews in Dallas. Parents of Freshmen Visit with College Representatives on the Oakridge campus (please encourage your child to visit a minimum
More informationCollege Planning Calendar
Bucharest Christian Academy office of college planning and preparedness College Planning Calendar F r e s h m e n Winter / Spring Spring Start a binder or file to track your academic course work throughout
More informationAthabasca University Management Position Description Section I
Athabasca University Management Position Description Section I Position Information Update Only X Classification Review Position Title Social Media and Marketing Coordinator Position # 999074 Department
More informationKey Points for New Zealand Students Interested in Studying in the United States
Key Points for New Zealand Students Interested in Studying in the United States There is a large amount of choice and variance when considering schools to apply to in the United States There are over 4,000
More information2012-2013 Application for Admission. Office of Admissions P.O. Box 352 Crawfordsville, Indiana 47933-0352 Phone: 800-345-5385 Fax: 765-361-6437
Wabash 2012-2013 Application for Admission Wabash Office of Admissions P.O. Box 352 Crawfordsville, Indiana 47933-0352 Phone: 800-345-5385 Fax: 765-361-6437 E-mail: admissions@wabash.edu www.wabash.edu
More informationMaking College An Affordable Reality Preparing and Paying For College The Right Way
Making College An Affordable Reality Preparing and Paying For College The Right Way College and Financial Coaches Ready to Serve Your Family COLLEGE ADVISORS GROUP LLC 401-821-0080 Graduates 2013 College
More informationGraduate Program Application for Admission
Graduate Program Application for Admission Graduate Program Division of Education, Supervision and Instruction Tougaloo College Tougaloo, MS 39174 601-977-7744 education@tougaloo.edu SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER:
More informationMarketing, Recruitment and Admissions. Marketing Strategy 2013-2015
Marketing, Recruitment and Admissions Marketing Strategy 2013-2015 November 2013 The Marketing Strategy is created cooperatively by the Department s marketing managers and exists to advance the University
More informationPROGRAM MODIFICATION PROPOSAL
PROGRAM MODIFICATION PROPOSAL Name of Institution: South Carolina State University Name of Program: Doctor of Education Educational Administration (Ed.D.) Higher Education Concentration Program Designation
More informationCollege Preparation Night
Starting the College Processes: Throughout the entire process, you may initiate contact (via email, instant messenger, fax, phone and/or letters) as much as you want. Phone message (except specific camp
More informationDivision of Communications Strategic Plan
February 20, 2013 Division of Communications Strategic Plan The Division of Communications is team of talented, dedicated communications professionals who work to tell the story of Eastern Michigan University.
More informationSocial Media in College Marketing and Communication
Social media in college marketing and communication MACRAO Annual Conference October 24, 2011 Andrew Careaga Missouri University of Science and Technology Dawn Hatterman Metropolitan Community College-Maple
More informationTERRY E. WHITTUM. Professional Profile. Professional Experience
TERRY E. WHITTUM Professional Profile Over thirty years of successful enrollment management experience with a demonstrated record of growing enrollments, increasing academic profiles, and managing financial
More informationEDUCATION AFTER HIGH SCHOOL. What steps do I need to take to apply to college?
The Road to College 2 EDUCATION AFTER HIGH SCHOOL The BIG Idea What steps do I need to take to apply to college? AGENDA Approx. 45 minutes I. Warm Up (5 minutes) II. What Colleges Need to Know About You
More informationMarketing and Communications Policy Q&A. What defines a M&C Activity?
Marketing and Communications Policy Q&A What defines a M&C Activity? The process of communicating to internal and external stakeholders, including community relations, government and legislative leaders,
More informationColin A. Ormsby, PhD. Doctor of Philosophy; Education (with distinction), University of California at Berkeley, 2002
Colin A. Ormsby, PhD EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy; Education (with distinction), University of California at Berkeley, 2002 Master s of Arts; Administration and Policy Analysis in Higher Education, Stanford
More informationAPPENDIX C. Marshall University Recruitment Plan, 2009-2010
APPENDIX C Marshall University Recruitment Plan, 2009-2010 75 A. Recruitment Plan Overview Purpose: The Office of Recruitment at Marshall University operates for the purpose of recruiting a diverse and
More informationScholarships and Financial Aid
Dream It. Achieve It. Scholarships and Financial Aid INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON A great university is a place that ignites your academic passion, extends learning beyond the classroom, and supports
More informationPaying for School Checklist
Paying for School Checklist There is a lot to do to get into college. Planning ahead will save you time and energy in the long run! Use this checklist to stay on track for college. Better yet, use it to
More informationFIRST YEAR OF COLLEGE
FIRST YEAR OF COLLEGE WEST VIRGINIA GEAR UP INITIATIVES Three college-planning milestone events College Application and Exploration Week College Goal Sunday/ FAFSA Completion Campaign College Decision
More informationSS_SL_iMPACT_Officer Application_2015. Northeast Iowa Community College impact Officer Application
SS_SL_iMPACT_Officer Application_2015 Northeast Iowa Community College Name: Phone Number: Email Address: Home Address: Shade in times you are unavailable and leave times you are FREE/available blank.
More informationGeneral College Counseling Timelines
General College Counseling Timelines As the college process will vary student- to- student, the purpose of this outline is to provide general timelines of what to expect during the high school years. You
More information2015-2016 Application for Admission. Office of Admissions P.O. Box 352 Crawfordsville, Indiana 47933-0352 Phone: 800-345-5385 Fax: 765-361-6437
Wabash 2015-2016 Application for Admission Wabash Office of Admissions P.O. Box 352 Crawfordsville, Indiana 47933-0352 Phone: 800-345-5385 Fax: 765-361-6437 E-mail: admissions@wabash.edu www.wabash.edu
More informationcase study #001 Revamping marketing and communications for independent schools: A boarding school case study
case study #001 Revamping marketing and communications for independent schools: A boarding school case study Abstract An independent school, a grades 9-12 boarding/day school located in a nontraditional
More informationBuild relationships with teachers and friends who support your college aspirations
Full Checklist 9th Grade Make sure your classes are considered college prep Build relationships with teachers and friends who support your college aspirations Get involved in activities inside and outside
More informationOhio Christian University Circleville, OH
C O L L E G E P R O F I L E - O V E R V I E W Ohio Christian University Circleville, OH Ohio Christian University (formerly Circleville Bible College), is a private, church-affiliated college founded in
More informationOverview of Today s Presentation
College Horizons 101: Info for Prospective Applicants Presenter: Hillary Abe, Coordinator of Recruitment & Alumni Affairs For Questions - Email: hillary.abe@collegehorizons.org Phone: 520-425-2407 Overview
More informationPeel High School Students and Post-secondary School Opportunities. Peel Children and Youth Initiative April 2014
Peel High School Students and Post-secondary School Opportunities Peel Children and Youth Initiative April 2014 1 Introduction In 2012, PCYI published the findings from a mixed method study on improving
More informationReach. your online education. destination
Reach your online education destination Wherever you The Learning House, Inc. helps colleges and universities achieve their online education goals by working with them to create quality online courses
More informationInstitution: Oral Roberts University (207582) User ID: P2075822
Part A - Mission Statement 1. Provide the institution's mission statement or a web address (URL) where the mission statement can be found. Typed statements are limited to 2,000 characters or less. The
More informationTurn Your Degree into a Career
Turn Your Degree into a Career LERN Awards Category: Marketing LERN Award Marketing According to recent statistics over a third of graduates from the 2010/2011 cohort are unemployed or underemployed, working
More informationGuidance Department College Admissions Counseling
Guidance Department College Admissions Counseling 2014-2015 3 Ryerson Avenue Caldwell, NJ 07006 973-226-0660 Fax: 973-226-2693 msda@msdacademy.org www.msdacademy.org Dear students and families, As your
More informationSTANDARD #2. Strategic Planning
As part of our ACBSP accreditation requirements, we routinely provide reliable information to the public on our performance, including student achievement such as assessment results. Portions of our report
More informationContinue to stay involved in your extra-curricular activities, remembering to document your involvement.
College Planning: A Four Year Overview Freshman Year Begin your high school career by taking academically challenging courses. Focus on your studies. This year is important as it is the beginning of your
More informationTown Hall Meeting. October 7, 2015
Town Hall Meeting October 7, 2015 Our Purpose To transform the world by transforming lives Our Strategic Anchors Focus relentlessly on student achievement Embed and support diversity Be indispensible to
More informationFunction: Admissions Marketing. Function: Public Relations. ensuring the MVC brand is recognizable on all materials. Using the same logo, etc.
Missouri Valley College Marketing & Media Relations Assessment and Planning Report Year: FY 14 Service Program: Marketing & Media Relations Supervisor: April DeGraff I. Mission The mission of the Marketing
More information2014/2015 Southwest Virginia Community College President s Goals
2014/2015 Southwest Virginia Community College President s Goals Access VCCS Goal: Increase the number of individuals who are educated and trained by Virginia s Community Colleges by 50,000 to an annual
More informationWebsite Design & Development. Mobile Websites. Landing Pages
We are a results oriented full service marketing and advertising agency with offices nationwide. We help our clients attract and convert qualified prospective clients through the use of strategic marketing
More informationEnrollment Marketing Essentials:
Enrollment Marketing Essentials: New Insights into Students College Search and Decision Process Presented by Matthew Ward, Ph.D. California Lutheran University Pamela Kiecker Royall, Ph.D. Royall & Company
More informationBest Practices in Social Media
Best Practices in Social Media Summary of Findings from the Third Comprehensive Study of Social Media Use by Schools, Colleges and Universities April 18, 2012 In collaboration with the Council for Advancement
More informationWhat can you do to help your child prepare for his/her college education?
What can you do to help your child prepare for his/her college education? Your child needs help with: Setting expectations Knowing what classes to take in high school Preparing for standardized tests (ACT)
More informationCOLLEGE INFORMATION GUIDE FOR THE PLAYER
COLLEGE INFORMATION GUIDE FOR THE PLAYER This document is designed to help familiarize you with the college recruiting process. While it contains a lot of helpful information, you still have a lot of research
More informationAddendum # 1 Clarification to Questions
UNC School of the Arts Marketing Services #62-00235 Addendum # 1 Clarification to Questions Questions were received regarding the initial. Please find answers to those questions below: SECTION Vendor Question
More informationCollege Planning Packet. Name:
College Planning Packet Name: This packet contains: The Role of the College Counselor College Planning Checklist Brochure Initial Meeting Fall of Junior Year Questionnaire College Check List: Junior Year
More informationLessons from Recent Enrollment Management Research and Implications for Christian Colleges
Lessons from Recent Enrollment Management Research and Implications for Christian Colleges Kevin Crockett President/CEO and Principal Noel-Levitz All material in this presentation, including text and images,
More informationTri-County Regional Vocational Technical High School
High School Timetable Use this timeline to help you make sure you re accomplishing everything you need to accomplish on time. Ninth Grade As soon as you can, meet with your counselor to begin talking about
More informationINTERIM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ON TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED COURSES AND PROGRAMS
INTERIM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ON TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED COURSES AND PROGRAMS I. Rationale The primary purposes of instructional technology are to facilitate effective instruction and enhance student learning,
More informationCampaign Goals, Objectives and Timeline SEO & Pay Per Click Process SEO Case Studies SEO & PPC Strategy On Page SEO Off Page SEO Pricing Plans Why Us
Campaign Goals, Objectives and Timeline SEO & Pay Per Click Process SEO Case Studies SEO & PPC Strategy On Page SEO Off Page SEO Pricing Plans Why Us & Contact Generate organic search engine traffic to
More informationNon-Academic Effectiveness Process Documentation
Institutional Assessment 328 Tigert Hall PO Box 113175 Gainesville, FL 32611-3175 (352) 273-1090 Non-Academic Effectiveness Process Documentation Division of Enrollment Management Mission Statement The
More informationStrategic Enrollment Plan (SEM) 2011-2013
Chicago State University Strategic Enrollment Plan (SEM) 2011-2013 Division of Enrollment Management Enrollment Trends Year Total Enrollment First-time Full-time Cohort 2007 6810 379 2008 6820 402 2009
More information2013-2014 Academic Year Administrative Assessment Report University Relations
2013-2014 Academic Year Administrative Assessment Report University Relations Mission Statement: The mission of the Office of University Relations is to support and promote Kean University s mission of
More informationThe Online Expectations of Prospective College Students and Their Parents
2011 E-Expectations Report The Online Expectations of Prospective College Students and Their Parents To recruit prospective students today, you have to look beyond your Web site. The rise of social networking
More informationSTUDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES
STUDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES Jacksonville State University offers a broad program of financial aid to assist as many qualified students as possible. Since the University cannot meet the financial needs of
More informationEducation Administrator, Director and Principal Careers, Jobs, and Employment Information
Education Administrator, Director and Principal Careers, Jobs, and Employment Information Career and Job Highlights for Education Administrators Qualifications such a master s or doctoral degree and experience
More informationGraduate School Guide
Graduate School Guide Graduate school is a significant investment of time, money, and resources. Before applying to programs, you need to determine: If graduate school is right for you How to select a
More informationMPP Internal Benchmark Survey Job Descriptions by Job Title
MPP Internal Benchmark Survey Job Descriptions by Job Title 063 064 065 067 066 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 Associate Dean, College of Agriculture Under direction of the dean, provides administrative support
More information