GUIDANCE - Subrecipient and Vendor Determinations Federal Funds
|
|
|
- Shanon Gallagher
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Date of Issue: July 21, 2008 Office of Issuance: AWI FG 063 Reference: Final Subrecipient/Vendor Guidance GUIDANCE - Subrecipient and Vendor Determinations Federal Funds OF INTEREST TO: Workforce Florida Inc., Regional Workforce Boards (RWBs), Early Learning Coalitions (ELCs), and other subrecipients of federal funds from the Agency for Workforce Innovation (Agency). This guidance also applies to subrecipients of the above and any affiliated or related entities. SUBJECT: Process for determining whether a contracted entity is a subrecipient or a vendor. PURPOSE: To provide guidance for determining whether payments to third parties create subrecipient or vendor relationships for federal funds. DEFINITIONS: Fund Recipient: A recipient and/or subrecipient of federal funds. EFFECTIVE DATE: Issuance of this guidance represents approval by Agency management of the indicated procedures and related administrative forms. These procedures will be effective as of the date of this guidance paper. If you have questions or concerns regarding the guidance provided here, please contact the Financial Management Systems Assurance Section (FMSAS) at (850) or by at [email protected] or [email protected].. AUTHORITY: I. OMB Circular A-133 II. 29 C.F.R III. 7 C.F.R IV. 38 C.F.R V. 45 C.F.R
2 Guidance on Subrecipient and Vendor Determinations Analysis: I. How does one determine if an agreement/contract creates a subrecipient or a vendor relationship? A. Federal regulations outline five characteristics that are indicative of a subrecipient relationship and five characteristics indicative of a vendor relationship. (OMB Circ. A ). A subrecipient often: 1. Determines who is eligible to receive federal financial assistance; 2. Has its performance measured against whether the objectives of the federal program are met; 3. Has responsibility for programmatic decision making; 4. Has responsibility for adherence to applicable federal program compliance requirements; and 5. Uses the federal funds to carry out a program of the organization as compared to providing goods or services for a program of the passthrough entity. B. A vendor often: 1. Provides the goods and services within normal business operations; 2. Provides similar goods or services to many different purchasers; 3. Operates in a competitive environment; 4. Provides goods or services that are ancillary to the operation of the federal program; and 5. Is not subject to compliance requirements of the federal program. C. The following indicators of subrecipient and vendor relationships established by USDOL One-Stop Comprehensive Financial Management Technical Assistance Guide dated July 2002 provide further guidance: 2
3 Factor Vendor Subrecipient Activity 1 Sell deliverables (goods/services) Provide services Assistance Arrangement Buyer-seller Financial assistance to operate a program Closeout Package Final invoice Comprehensive Control Control is outcome focused Control is on process Development Costs Absorbed Controlled Extent of Flexibility Bound to adhere to specific contract terms Latitude to make decision within terms of agreement Federal Rules N/A Compliance On-the-Job Subgrantee developed (direct Training employer award) Award to broker Payment Basis 2 Is paid for specific deliverables Is paid for services whether expensed as a deliverable or not Product Specific outcomes Operate a program Performance Measured 3 Against the specific requirements of contract Against the performance outcomes of the financial assistance award Product Development Develops product and delivers from inventory Controls development Public Policy Contract specific clauses Standard statement of assurances Purpose of the Award To provide specific goods or services To carry out a program goal Receipt of Funds Number of items delivered Costs incurred Risk Risk to vendor Share risk with awarding agency Type of Training Referral Slotting on an individual referral basis Filling a class-sized training program Type of Market Type of Product For sale within normal business operation; existing product tailored to the program solicitation Provide specific product or service ancillary to the Federal program Customized for specific program purposes Design a program to meet a broader goal such as performance outcomes 1 There may be instances where it is possible to obtain the same type of services under either a vendor or a subrecipient award. 2 Federal reform efforts are now shifting emphasis from paying for process to paying for results. Such performanceand-outcome-based payments are possible under both vendor and subrecipient awards. 3 Same as 2 above. 3
4 D. Fund Recipients should use the characteristics above as an aid in distinguishing between vendors and subrecipients. However, it is not expected that all characteristics will be present in all cases. The substance of the relationship is determinative, not the form of the agreement. (OMB Circ. A (d)). E. For-profit subrecipients are not included in this analysis. Federal regulations state that the contract with for-profit subrecipients should describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the contract, and post-award audits. (OMB Circ. A (e)). II. What are the consequences of subrecipient / vendor determinations? A. Vendors. In most cases, the Fund Recipient s compliance responsibility for vendors is only to ensure that the procurement, receipt, and payment for goods and services comply with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Program compliance requirements normally do not pass through to vendors. However, the Fund Recipient is responsible for ensuring compliance for vendor transactions which are structured such that the vendor is responsible for program compliance or the vendor's records must be reviewed to determine program compliance. Also, when these vendor transactions relate to a major program, the scope of the audit shall include determining whether these transactions are in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. (OMB Circ. A (f)). B. Subrecipients. Payments received for goods or services provided as a subrecipient are considered federal awards and are subject to audit. Treating a subrecipient as a vendor is not permissible and does not remove audit requirements for federal awards. Where federal awards are not audited properly, federal agencies and pass-through entities are required to take appropriate action using sanctions such as: (a) Withholding a percentage of Federal awards until the audit is completed satisfactorily; (b) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs; (c) Suspending Federal awards until the audit is conducted; or (d) Terminating the Federal award. 4
5 Recommendations: I. Subrecipient and vendor determination checklist. A checklist is attached to this guidance paper to assist Fund Recipients in distinguishing between subrecipient and vendor relationships. The Fund Recipient is encouraged to use this checklist to document its determination process. II. Substance of the relationship. OMB Circular A-133 discusses the use of judgment in making subrecipient and vendor determinations. Those regulations state: There may be unusual circumstances or exceptions to the listed characteristics. In making the determination of whether a subrecipient or vendor relationship exists, the substance of the relationship is more important than the form of the agreement. It is not expected that all of the characteristics will be present and judgment should be used in determining whether an entity is a subrecipient or vendor. Thus, the Fund Recipient should evaluate the substance of each relationship to determine whether the majority of features represent a vendor or subrecipient relationship. 5
6 FEDERAL SUBRECIPIENT AND VENDOR DETERMINATION CHECKLIST Reference 29CFR and OMB Circular A Contract Number: CFDA Number: Prepared by: Date: Subrecipient and Vendor Determinations (a) General: An auditee may be a recipient, a subrecipient, and a vendor. Federal awards expended as a recipient or a subrecipient would be subject to audit under this part. The payments received for goods or services provided as a vendor would not be considered Federal awards. The guidance in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section should be considered in determining whether payments constitute a Federal award or a payment for goods and services. SUBRECIPIENT (check YES or NO for each statement) (b) Federal Award: Characteristics indicative of a Federal award received by a subrecipient are when the organization: YES NO 1. Determines who is eligible to receive what Federal financial assistance. 2. Has its performance measured against whether the objectives of the Federal program are met. 3. Has responsibility for programmatic decision-making. 4. Has responsibility for adherence to applicable Federal program compliance requirements. 5. Uses the Federal funds to carry out a program of the organization as compared to providing goods or services for a program of the pass-through entity. VENDOR (check YES or NO for each statement) (c) Payment for goods and services: YES NO 1. Provides the goods and services within a normal business operation. 2. Provides similar goods and services within normal business operation. 3. Operates in a competitive environment 4. Provides goods or services that are ancillary to the operation of the Federal program 5. Is not subject to compliance requirements of the Federal program. 6
7 FEDERAL SUBRECIPIENT AND VENDOR DETERMINATION CHECKLIST (d) Use of judgment in making determination. There may be unusual circumstances or exceptions to the listed characteristics. In making the determination of whether a subrecipient or vendor relationship exists, the substance of the relationship is more important than the form of the agreement. It is not expected that all of the characteristics will be present and judgment should be used in determining whether an entity is a subrecipient or vendor. An equal opportunity employer/program. Auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to individuals with disabilities. All voice telephone numbers on this document may be reached by persons using TTY/TDD equipment via the Florida Relay Service at
Guide to Subrecipient/Subgrantee Payments vs. Vendor/Con tractor Payments General distinctions:
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 requires grant-awarding entities to determine whether an arrangement resulting from a particular award that the awarding entity makes to another
Distinctions between Subawards and Contracts
Appendix B Distinctions between s and s This attachment uses OMB Circular A-133, Section 210, as the basis for distinguishing between subawards and contracts. Five Characteristics Indicative of a Per OMB
ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER
Page 1 of 9 Index Purpose of Guidelines Policy Who is Responsible Definitions and Terms Responsibilities and Procedures o Audit Requirements o For-profit Recipients and Audit Requirements o Roles and Responsibilities
MODULE DESCRIPTIONS. A Brief Introduction to SMART Training (20 minutes)
MODULE DESCRIPTIONS A Brief Introduction to SMART Training (20 minutes) This module introduces the SMART theme for the series of training modules on developing and implementing sound financial management
10/30/2015. Procurement Under the New Requirements. Why This Session Is Needed. Lesson Overview & Module Objectives. Changes to conflict of interest
Requirements Procurement under the New Requirements 1 1 Why This Session Is Needed New provisions in Uniform Guidance Changes to conflict of interest requirements in Uniform Guidance Distinctions between
Boston Medical Center Policy and Procedure Manual
Policy #: 39.03.489 Issued: October 2001 Reviewed: Revised: March 2015 Section: 39 Research Subcontract (Subrecipient) Monitoring Policy and Procedure Purpose: To provide guidance to Research Administrators,
Thompson Publishing Group, Inc. Audio Conference June 6, 2006 Troubleshooting Subrecipient Monitoring: Review of Pass-Through Entity Responsibilities
What is Monitoring? A definition from the Department of Health and Human Services Grants Policy Directive: Monitoring - A process whereby the programmatic and business management performance aspects of
Charter Township of Shelby Macomb County, Michigan. Federal Awards Supplemental Information December 31, 2010
Macomb County, Michigan Federal Awards Supplemental Information December 31, 2010 Contents Independent Auditor's Report 1 Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other
RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL CHAPTER 10.650 FLORIDA SINGLE AUDIT ACT AUDITS NONPROFIT AND FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS EFFECTIVE 9-30-15 RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL CHAPTER 10.650 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule Description
STATE OF FLORIDA COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND FEDERAL AWARDS. In Accordance With OMB Circular A-133
REPORT NO. 2012-142 MARCH 2012 STATE OF FLORIDA COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND FEDERAL AWARDS In Accordance With OMB Circular A-133 For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011
AN INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR GRANT RECIPIENTS
AN INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR GRANT RECIPIENTS National Historical Publications and Records Commission National Archives www.archives.gov/nhprc June 17, 2015 Table of Contents USE OF THE
AUDIT GUIDELINES. Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment (SAPT) Program. Michigan Department of Community Health
AUDIT GUIDELINES Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment (SAPT) Program Michigan Department of Community Health October 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 AUDIT REQUIREMENTS...... 2 Single Audit...
Guidance on NSP-Eligible Acquisition & Rehabilitation Activities
Guidance on NSP-Eligible Acquisition & Rehabilitation Activities This NSP Policy Guidance describes how to determine whether or not a property is eligible for acquisition and or rehabilitation with NSP
Administration of Grant HAVA
Administration of Grant Funds Authorized by HAVA Role of the Grants Office in the Administration of HAVA Funds Issue Guidance Make Grant Awards Provide Oversight and Monitoring Provide Technical Assistance
AUDIT OF NASA GRANTS AWARDED TO THE PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY RESOURCES FOR EDUCATION
JULY 26, 2012 AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF AUDITS AUDIT OF NASA GRANTS AWARDED TO THE PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY RESOURCES FOR EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL National Aeronautics and Space Administration
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GUIDE FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GUIDE FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SEPTEMBER 2008 Questions about this guide may be directed to the National Endowment for
SBIR/STTR Post Award Frequently Asked Questions
SBIR/STTR Post Award Frequently Asked Questions FedConnect 1. We have not received notification that our company s grant has been awarded. If our grant has been awarded, how do we access our assistance
Policy on Subcontracts
Policy on Subcontracts BACKGROUND A subcontract is a contract awarded to another institution by the primary recipient (prime) of a contract or grant. It is also known as a subaward, subagreement, or consortium
Federal Single Audit Act Update
Federal Single Audit Act Update Presented By: James Halleran, CPA Partner June 16, 2015 What We Will Cover Background and Effective Dates Key Points of the Uniform Guidance for Federal Awards Key Points
Subawards Policies and Procedures Johns Hopkins University Research Administration
1 Subawards Policies and Procedures Johns Hopkins University Research Administration I. Introduction Sponsored project awards made to The Johns Hopkins University ( JHU or University ) are generally conducted
Grants Management Training. Office of Federal Programs August 19, 2015
Training Office of Federal Programs August 19, 2015 MS State Board of Education s Vision and Mission Vision To create a world-class educational system that gives students the knowledge and skills to be
Accounting, Auditing, Consulting, and Tax
James Marta & Company LLP Certified Public Accountants Accounting, Auditing, Consulting, and Tax INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL
MONITORING PERFORMANCE
MONITORING PERFORMANCE Monitoring the performance of the contractor is a key function of proper contract administration. The purpose is to ensure that the contractor is performing all duties in accordance
ATSU Financial Management Plan for Administration of Grants and Contracts
ATSU Financial Management Plan for Administration of Grants and Contracts Overview ATSU is committed to maintaining a financial management system that provides accurate, current, and full disclosure of
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS SINGLE AUDIT OF FEDERALLY ASSISTED GRANT PROGRAMS JUNE 30, 2014
SINGLE AUDIT OF FEDERALLY ASSISTED GRANT PROGRAMS JUNE 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS June 30, 2014 Page Number Independent Auditors Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards AT 2 CFR 200
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards AT 2 CFR 200 November 11, 2014 WHAT S CHANGING AND WHEN? Grants Reform Office of Management and Budget Circulars
APPLIED SCIENCE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR PTRs, GRANTS & TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER STAFF
APPLIED SCIENCE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR PTRs, GRANTS & TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER STAFF Purpose: This standard operating procedure assists the Applied Science personnel in performing
eta WIA Monitor Training P a g e 0
eta WIA Monitor Training P a g e 0 Monitor Training Contents Why Do We Monitor?... 2 Monitoring Responsibilities... 9 Matrix of Monitoring Responsibilities... 9 Pre-Review Preparation... 11 During the
SUBRECIPIENT COMMITMENT FORM
Guidance on how to complete this form is found at: http://spo.berkeley.edu/forms/subaward/subrecipient_instructions.html. SECTION A: UC Berkeley Proposal Information Name of UC Berkeley PI: Prime Sponsor:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Special Attention of: Notice: CPD 96-05 All Secretary's Representatives All State/Area Coordinators Issued: October 11,
14.000 FINANCING ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FUNDS. U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. North Carolina Housing Finance Agency
APRIL 2008 14.000 FINANCING ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FUNDS State Project/Program: CONSTRUCTION TRAINING PARTNERSHIP Federal Authorization: 24 CFR 883 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development North Carolina
2015-16 RWB Financial Monitoring Tool
Bureau of Financial Monitoring and Accountability October 15, 2015 107 East Madison Street Caldwell Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399 www.floridajobs.org TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW... 3 SECTION 1 OBJECTIVES...
Audit Unit Policy 16 th Revision April 2006. Floyd Blodgett, Education Accounting and Auditing Analyst
Audit Unit Policy 16 th Revision April 2006 Floyd Blodgett, Education Accounting and Auditing Analyst This document describes the process by which the Vermont Department of Education (VTDOE) conducts its
Tribal TANF and CCDF Guide to
Tribal TANF and CCDF Guide to Financial Management, Grants Administration, and Program Accountability DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Child Care Bureau Office of Family Assistance Table of Contents
Procedures and Guidelines for External Grants and Sponsored Programs
Definitions: Procedures and Guidelines for External Grants and Sponsored Programs 1. Grant and Contract Financial Administration Office (Grants Office): The office within the Accounting Operations Area
Office of Inspector General Office of Audit
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION Atlanta Office of Inspector General Office of Audit THE CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA DID NOT ADEQUATELY MANAGE WELFARE-TO- WORK AND WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT GRANTS Date
EPA Policy on Assessing Capabilities of Non-Profit Applicants for Managing Assistance Awards
Classification No.: 5700.8 Approval Date: 02/23/2009 Review Date: 02/23/2012 1. PURPOSE. EPA Policy on Assessing Capabilities of Non-Profit Applicants for Managing Assistance Awards This Order establishes
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS THE CLOSEOUT PROCESS. What should the grantee have completed in preparation for and during closeout?
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS THE CLOSEOUT PROCESS Where can I find DOL/ETA s closeout regulations? What are the definitions of closeout terms? What is a grant lifecycle? What are the standard closeout procedures?
http://agnis/sites/amsissuances/shared%20documents/201.1.htm
Page 1 of 11 Directive 201.1 11/4/91 ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTS AND MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PURPOSE... 2 II. REPLACEMENT HIGHLIGHTS... 2 III. POLICY... 2 IV. DEFINITIONS... 2 V.
Agreement Number: F.E.I.D. Number: Procurement Number: D.M.S. Catalog Class Number:
Page 1 of 9 Agreement Number: F.E.I.D. Number: Procurement Number: D.M.S. Catalog Class Number: This Master University Agreement ( Agreement ), entered into this day of, ( Effective Date ), between the
ATTACHMENT B FEDERAL CERTIFICATIONS FOOD SERVICE MANAGEMENT COMPANIES AND PUBLIC SCHOOLS
The undersigned states that: ATTACHMENT B FEDERAL CERTIFICATIONS FOOD SERVICE MANAGEMENT COMPANIES AND PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1. He or she is the duly authorized representative of the Vendor named below; 2. He
MICHIGAN AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL THOMAS H. MCTAVISH, C.P.A. AUDITOR GENERAL
MICHIGAN OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL AUDIT REPORT THOMAS H. MCTAVISH, C.P.A. AUDITOR GENERAL The auditor general shall conduct post audits of financial transactions and accounts of the state and of all
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY COST-REIMBURSABLE SUBAWARD AGREEMENT #
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY COST-REIMBURSABLE SUBAWARD AGREEMENT # This Cost Reimbursable Subaward Agreement is entered into in order to specify the terms and conditions under which Florida Atlantic University,
PRATT COMMUNITY COLLEGE SINGLE AUDIT REPORT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT
SINGLE AUDIT REPORT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT SINGLE AUDIT REPORT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT SINGLE AUDIT REPORT Year Ended June 30, 2015
Core Monitoring Guide
Core Monitoring Guide April 2005 eta UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION Core Monitoring Guide April 2005 United States Department of Labor Employment and Training
CHAPTER 23. Contract Management and Administration
Date Issued: June 12, 2009 Date Last Revised: September 28, 2015 CHAPTER 23. Contract Management and Administration Table of Contents CHAPTER 23. Contract Management and Administration... 23-1 23.1 Policy...
Objectives. Single Audit: Recent Changes and Preparation Tips. Overview. Overview 1/20/2016
Objectives Single Audit: Recent Changes and Preparation Tips January 21, 2016 Discuss and review recently issued Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal
RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL CHAPTER 10.550 LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY AUDITS EFFECTIVE 9-30-15 RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL CHAPTER 10.550 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule Description Page Section No. PREFACE TO
HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES All H-GAC Workforce Solutions contractors will use these management policies and procedures in executing the
Project Management Procedures
1201 Main Street, Suite 1600 Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Project Management Procedures Start Up The grant becomes effective upon return of one copy of the grant award executed by the Chief Executive
.110-9 Effective Dates and Consistent Implementation (Federal)... 9.110-10 Effective Dates and Consistent Implementation (States)... 9.
Frequently Asked Questions For The Office of Management and Budget s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards At 2 CFR 200 The following are frequently
H:\Cost\OMB\OMB completed templates\subpart F-Audit Requirements\Subpart F Audit Req Word Docs\Uniform-Guidance-Section_200.
H:\Cost\OMB\OMB completed templates\subpart F-Audit Requirements\Subpart F Audit Req Word Docs\Uniform-Guidance-Section_200.512 - Fund Accounting.docx 200.512 Report submission. (a) General. (1) The audit
10 Steps for Managing Sub-Grants
New Partners Initiative 10 Steps for Managing Sub-Grants DRAFT Table of Contents ACRONYMS AED PEPFAR NPI USG Introduction T he Academy for Educational Development (AED) provides technical support for grantees
ATTACHMENT L. 2012/13 Internal Control Questionnaire for Workforce Organizations/Programs
ATTACHMENT L 2012/13 Internal Control Questionnaire for Workforce Organizations/Programs Prepared by: Financial Monitoring and Accountability Section Date: August 10, 2012 Introduction and Purpose The
OMB. Uniform Guidance
2014 OMB Uniform Guidance Assessing the OMB Uniform Guidance: Major Changes and Impacts The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) consolidated the federal government s guidance on Uniform Administrative
Frequently Asked Questions Updated: September 2015
Frequently Asked Questions Updated: September 2015 For The Office of Management and Budget s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards At 2 CFR 200
WASHINGTON STATE WIC POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL
WASHINGTON STATE WIC POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL VOLUME 2, CHAPTER 6 and Audits DOH 960-106 June 2014 WIC does not discriminate The U.S. Department of Agriculture WIC program prohibits discrimination against
Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) May 2013
Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) May 2013 PTMISEA Created by Proposition 1B The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security
