SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD F. STOKES 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 JUDGE SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE GEORGETOWN, DE 19947
|
|
- Joanna Newman
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD F. STOKES 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 JUDGE SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE GEORGETOWN, DE Stephen P. Doughty, Esquire Lyons Doughty & Velhuis, P.C. 15 Ashley Place, Suite 2B Wilmington, DE James D. Griffin, Esquire Griffin & Hackett, P.A. 16 W. Market Street P.O. Box 612 Georgetown, DE Re: Beneficial Delaware, Inc. v. Lena Waples, C.A. No. 05L RFS Date Submitted: June 23, 2006 Date Decided: July 3, 2006 Dear Counsel: Beneficial Delaware, Inc. ( Beneficial or Plaintiff ) has brought a mortgage foreclosure action against Lena and Clifford Waples ( Waples or collectively Defendant ). The parties have submitted cross-motions for summary judgment. In this posture, the Court shall deem the motions to be the equivalent of a stipulation for decision on the merits based on the record submitted with the motions. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 56(h). Of course, summary judgment only may be entered where a party is legally entitled to relief on undisputed facts. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 56(c). The Court reviewed the
2 motions, pleadings, requests for admissions, the exhibits, and the positions expressed by the parties. After consideration, summary judgment is entered against Beneficial. Undisputed Matters The Waples executed and delivered a loan repayment and security agreement ( the agreement ) to Beneficial. The amount financed was $33, with interest at the rate of %. The monthly payments were $ with the first installment due on November 21, The final payment date was October 21, The security given was a mortgage (the mortgage ) on property owned only by Lena Waples located at Route 2, Box 104, Lincoln, Sussex County, Delaware. The mortgage and agreement were signed on October 21, Thereafter, between 2003 and February of 2005, Defendant filed for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code which is designed to adjust debts of persons with regular income. See 9 Am Jur 2d Bankruptcy, 51. Beneficial acknowledged that any prior acceleration of the mortgage would have been de-accelerated in the Chapter 13 proceedings. Further, the parties agreed that the bankruptcy filing stayed foreclosure of the mortgage. See Am Jur 2d Bankruptcy, The Chapter 13 proceedings against Beneficial ended on or about February 25, Thereafter, Beneficial sought to foreclose the mortgage. However, it did not provide Waples with written notice about the right to reinstate the mortgage required in 2
3 paragraph 17 of the mortgage. 1 On May 4, 2005, the mortgage foreclosure complaint was filed in the Superior Court. The property was posted with a copy of the summons and complaint on July 8, In July of 2005, the Waples retained Mr. Griffin. He contacted Beneficial s counsel, Mr. Doughty about the right of reinstatement. In this regard, paragraph 18 of the mortgage provided that: 18. Borrower s Right to Reinstate. Notwithstanding Lender s acceleration of the sums secured by this Mortgage due to Borrower s breach, Borrower shall have the right to have any proceedings begun by Lender to enforce this Mortgage discontinued at any time prior to entry of a judgment enforcing this Mortgage if: (a) Borrower pays Lender all sums which would be then due under this Mortgage and the Note had no acceleration occurred; (b) Borrower cures all breaches of any other covenants or agreements of Borrower contained in this Mortgage; (c) Borrower pays all reasonable expenses incurred by Lender in enforcing the covenants and agreements of Borrower contained in this Mortgage, and in enforcing Lender s remedies as provided in paragraph 17 hereof, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys fees; and (d) Borrower takes such action as Lender may reasonably require to assure that the lien of this Mortgage, Lender s interest in the Property and Borrower s obligation to pay the sums secured by this Mortgage shall continue unimpaired. Upon such payment and cure by Borrower, this Mortgage and the obligations secured hereby shall remain in full force and effect as if no acceleration had occurred. Under paragraph 18(a), Beneficial had to be paid all sums which then would be 1 Nevertheless, the filing of the foreclosure satisfied any requirement to provide notice of the acceleration of the mortgage balance. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc. F.S.B. v. Meconi, WL (Del. Super. 1989). Paragraph 17 is set out at page 4, infra.. 3
4 due had no acceleration occurred. In an exchange of correspondence between counsel on July 7 and 15, 2005, the reinstatement amount for past due installments was $6, with a per diem of $ However, although entitled to reasonable fees, Beneficial demanded the amount of $3, for attorneys fees which Waples believed was unreasonable. In all circumstances, Waples argued that only five percent (5%) of the past due amount of $6, could be collected or the sum of $ On this point, paragraph 17 of the mortgage stated that: 17. Acceleration; Remedies. Except as provided in paragraph 16, hereof, or otherwise required by law, upon Borrower s breach of any covenant or agreement of Borrower in this Mortgage, including the covenants to pay when due any sums secured by this Mortgage, Lender prior to acceleration shall give notice to Borrower as provided in paragraph 12 hereof specifying: (1) the breach; (2) the action required to cure such breach; (3) a date, not less than 10 days from the date of notice is mailed to Borrower, by which such breach must be cured; and (4) that failure to cure such breach on or before the date specified in the notice may result in acceleration of the sums secured by this Mortgage, foreclosure by judicial proceeding, and sale of the Property. The notice shall further inform Borrower of the right to reinstate after acceleration and the right to assert in the foreclosure proceeding the nonexistence of a default or any other defense of Borrower to acceleration and foreclosure. If the breach is not cured on or before the date specified in the notice, Lender, at Lender s option, may declare all of the sums secured by this Mortgage to be immediately due and payable without further demand and may foreclose this Mortgage by judicial proceeding. Lender shall be entitled to collect in such proceeding all expenses of foreclosure, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys fees of 4
5 five percent (5%) of the amount decreed for principal and interest, which fee shall be allowed and paid as part of the decree of judgment in such proceeding, and costs of abstracts, title reports and documentary evidence. A cashier s check was tendered to Beneficial in the amount of $7, on July 15, It covered all sums due for reinstatement except for $3, in attorneys fees. Waples offered $ to satisfy this obligation which was included in the check. This figure was approximately double the amount Waples thought could be collected legally. On July 27, 2005, Beneficial rejected the offer, stating the $3, are actual attorneys fees and costs incurred in the bankruptcy and foreclosure. Kindly file a response to our complaint immediately. Question Presented Did Beneficial properly refuse Waples tender of payment to reinstate the mortgage? I find that it did not do so. The agreement did not provide for the payment of attorneys fees and expenses upon default. It could have been drafted differently. Rather the subject is found in the mortgage. During oral argument, the parties agreed that the maximum amount which could be collected through judgment in the foreclosure would be five percent (5%) of the amount decreed for principal and interest. This result would satisfy Delaware legislative and judicial authority. See Rock v. Short, 336 A.2d 219, 221 (Del. 1975) (the five percent (5%) authorized by 3912 is a maximum amount and not a minimum or 5
6 routine amount). The statute authorizing fees, 10 Del.C. 3912, was amended, effective June 26, 1991, to raise the limit from five to twenty percent (20%) of the amount adjudged for principal and interest. The mortgage failed to include the higher amount. The purpose for permitting counsel fees is to impose upon a debtor some part, at least, of the expense of collecting the debt evidenced by his obligation... and... in case of dispute, to leave the amount of the fee to be determined by a standard outside of the minds of the contracting parties, according to the judgment of the Court upon the facts and in the circumstances proved. Petitions of Warrington, 179 A. 505, 507 (Del. Super. 1935). Upon disagreement, a judge determines what a reasonable fee is based upon circumstances of the case and ethical considerations under Rule of Professional Conduct Waples argues that only five percent (5%) of past due installments could be collected. When the reinstatement question was raised in July of 2005, that figure was $ Since $ or about twice that figure was provided, Defendant argues that the limit was exceeded and, therefore, more than a reasonable fee was tendered. From Defendant s perspective, return of the cashier s check was not justified. Clearly, paragraph 17 established a ceiling of five percent (5%) of the judgment amount which ultimately would be entered after trial. The complaint and the supporting affidavit sought to recover judgment of $33, plus interest at the rate of % 2 An example of this situation can be found in PNC Bank, N.A. v. Jones, 2002 WL (Del. Super.). 6
7 plus court costs and attorneys fees. When reinstatement was requested, the accelerated principal and interest amounted to $42, If judgment were entered at that time, no more than $2, (5% x $49,952.69) could be collected. A plain reading of paragraph 17 leads me to conclude that the maximum limit of five percent (5%) refers to the accelerated balance of principal and interest, and the Waples contrary argument is not persuasive. On the other hand, Beneficial demanded $3, in attorneys fees in its letter of July 7, When refusing Waples tender on July 27, 2005, it claimed $3, were the actual Chapter 13 fees and costs incurred in the bankruptcy and foreclosure proceedings. After discovery and in the summary judgment process, Beneficial claimed fees of $2,400 for the bankruptcy together with $750 in costs. 3 Yet, the billings submitted for the bankruptcy actually totaled $1, At oral argument, Beneficial suggested its attorneys fees for the foreclosure were $650 without evidence to support the reasonableness of the amount. I disagree with Beneficial s argument that it can recover attorneys fees outside of this foreclosure. It claims fees for the Chapter 13 proceedings are collectible under paragraph 18(c) as reasonable expenses incurred by the Lender in enforcing the covenants and agreements of Borrower contained in the mortgage. The last part of paragraph 18(c) references the recovery of reasonable attorneys fees in enforcing the 3 Paragraph 6 of Beneficial s motion for summary judgment. 7
8 lender s remedies in paragraph 17, i.e., in mortgage foreclosure proceedings in the Superior Court. The reasonable expenses mentioned in the first part refer to costs such as payment by the Lender such as repair maintenance, security, assessments, and the like. Legal fees are focused in paragraph 17 with the foreclosure remedies. Furthermore, Beneficial did not and could not seek the recovery in the foreclosure complaint for its Chapter 13 expenses which is sought now. Paragraph 18(c) did not provide for an extra percentage of attorneys fees beyond five percent (5%) of the total amount adjudged for principal and interest. The mortgage cannot be read to require more legal fees to reinstate after a partial default than what could be awarded after trial for the whole balance. That would be an absurd result. On this record, Beneficial should have informed Waples of the right to reinstate. Further, the demand by Beneficial for payment of attorneys fees in the amount of $3, on July 7, 2005 is not reasonable as it exceeded the five percent (5%) limitation of $2, Nor is Beneficial s position improved by later claiming $2, in fees and $750 in costs for the same reason. In taking an inflexible approach, Beneficial deprived Waples of the right to reinstate, and it breached its obligations under paragraphs 17 and 18. Through the foreclosure process, it sought to collect more legal fees than were authorized. See also More Equity v. Dunn, 28 Conn. L. Rept., 2000 WL (Conn. Super.) (Lender s requested costs and fees were patently unreasonable where they were incurred after 8
9 refusal of the request for reinstatement.) Indeed, the proffered amount by Waples of $ exceeded the $650 Beneficial s counsel estimated for the foreclosure fees (even considering counsel s time after July of 2005 when reinstatement was refused). Considering the foregoing, summary judgment is entered against Beneficial and in favor of Waples. A condition of the judgment is that Beneficial receive a cashier s check in the amount of $7, and an additional amount for reasonable attorneys fees incurred in the foreclosure until July 15, If the parties continue to disagree, the Court will determine this figure on the scheduled trial date of July 19, Upon receipt of the money, the mortgage shall be reinstated with an effective date of July 15, 2005, and the mortgage foreclosure action shall be dismissed. Defendant also seeks the recovery of attorneys fees. Without a basis in the agreement, mortgage, or statute, counsel fees only can be recovered if bad faith is established. According to the Supreme Court in Baker v. Rapuano v. Pantano, 882 A.2d 232 (Del. 2005): Delaware follows the American Rule, whereby a prevailing party is generally expected to pay its own attorney s fees and costs. This Court has recognized limited equitable exceptions to that rule, including the exception for bad faith conduct during the litigation. Although there is no single, comprehensive definition of bad faith that will justify a feeshifting award, Delaware courts have previously awarded attorney s fees where (for example) parties have 4 The difference between $7, and the $7, amount tendered by the Waples last July is $ regarding the attorneys fees. An evidentiary hearing is required to determine what a reasonable fee would be at that time absent an agreement. 9
10 unnecessarily prolonged or delayed litigation, falsified records or knowingly asserted frivolous claims. The bad faith exception is applied in extraordinary circumstances as a tool to deter abusive litigation and to protect the integrity of the judicial process. As indicated, the Superior Court has the inherent power to assess fees on this basis. However, it is exercised with great restraint, and it is reserved for egregious situations as explained in the Baker case. See Shannon v. Meconi, 2006 WL (Del. Super.). Here, the lender unreasonably interpreted paragraphs 17 and 18 of the mortgage. However, its misjudgment does not rise to bad faith to justify a fee splitting award. The filing of the foreclosure was inevitable. The Waples request for attorneys fees is denied. 5 Beneficial is to pay costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Very truly yours, Richard F. Stokes RFS/cv cc: Prothonotary 5 Clifford Waples was only a party to the agreement but not the mortgage. Arguably his joinder in the foreclosure was appropriate to provide him notice of his obligations under the agreement. 10
Mortgage LLC d/b/a Champion Mortgage Company (hereinafter Nationstar ) in. the Estate of Mary Jean Oneschuk, Edward J. Oneschuk, Jr., heir, Kenneth J.
KIM E. AYVAZIAN MASTER IN CHANCERY COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHANCERY COURTHOUSE 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 AND NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE
More informationCase 08-01176-AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION
Case 08-01176-AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION In re: JOSE SANCHEZ Case No.: 01-42230-BKC-AJC and FANNY SANCHEZ, Chapter
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WEBER, STATE OF UTAH
The Order of Court is stated below: Dated: June 23, 2014 /s/ Michael D DiReda 12:08:17 PM District Court Judge Marty E. Moore (#8932) PECK HADFIELD BAXTER & MOORE, LLC 399 North Main, Suite 300 Logan,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT CRISTOBAL COLON, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. Case No.
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC d/b/a CHAMPION MORTGAGE, C.A. No K14L-10-024 RBY Plaintiff, v. JOHN MURDOCH CRANE, III, Heir and Personal
More informationNo. 05-11-00700-CV IN THE FOR THE RAY ROBINSON,
No. 05-11-00700-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016616444 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 November 30 P8:40 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS WELLS FARGO BANK,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Filed 5/19/97 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, 2d Civil
More informationShort Form Order NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY PRESENT: HON. ORIN R. KITZES PART 17 Justice
Short Form Order NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY PRESENT: HON. ORIN R. KITZES PART 17 Justice -----------------------------------------------------------------X NC TWO, L.P., as successor in interest
More informationVII. JUDGMENT RULE 54. JUDGMENTS; COSTS
VII. JUDGMENT RULE 54. JUDGMENTS; COSTS (a) Definition; Form. Judgment as used in these rules includes a decree and any order from which an appeal lies. A judgment shall not contain a recital of pleadings
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
Drew et. al. v. Drew et. al., No. 174-6-10 Cacv (Teachout, J., Sept. 23, 2013). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the
More informationDELINQUENT ASSESSMENT COLLECTION
Salvatori, Wood, & Buckel ATTORNEYS AT LAW 9132 Strada Place, Fourth Floor, Naples, FL 34108-2683 John D. Humphreville Tel: 239.552.4100 Direct Dial: 239.552.4107 Fax: 239.649.1706 jdh@swbnaples.com Web:
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In Re: Jason D. Misleh, Case Number: 15-41721 Debtor. Chapter 13 Honorable Mark A. Randon / I. INTRODUCTION OPINION AND ORDER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES L. MARTIN, Plaintiff Below- Appellant, v. NATIONAL GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant Below- Appellee. No. 590, 2013 Court Below Superior Court of
More informationORDER GRANTING TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY / HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE S MOTION TO INTERVENE
Pulitano v. Thayer St. Associates, Inc., No. 407-9-06 Wmcv (Wesley, J., Oct. 23, 2009) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy
More informationCompulsory Arbitration
Local Rule 1301 Scope. Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. (1) The following civil actions shall first be submitted to and heard by a Board of Arbitrators: (a) (b) (c) (d) Civil actions, proceedings
More informationu NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
NNED ON 1011612009 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY ndex Number : 602026/2007 SLVERMARK CORP. vs. ROSENTHAL&ROSENTHALNC SEQUENCE NUMBER : 003 SUMMARY JUDGMENT - MOTON DATE MOTON
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD F. STOKES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE JUDGE 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 TELEPHONE (302) 856-5264 February 20, 2014 Bradley J. Goewert, Esq. Thomas
More informationConsensus of Judges on Multnomah County Court Foreclosure Panel
Consensus of Judges on Multnomah County Court Foreclosure Panel The judges who serve on the Multnomah County Court s Foreclosure Panel have been presented with the following recurring issues, which over
More informationCHAPTER 702 FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES, AGREEMENTS FOR DEEDS, AND STATUTORY LIENS. 702.06 Deficiency decree; common-law suit to recover deficiency.
Florida Foreclosure is Judicial. Notice of Foreclosure Florida foreclosure begins when the lender files a lawsuit (Lis Pendens) against the homeowner. The homeowners must be notified of the legal action
More informationFrequently Asked Questions Foreclosure
Frequently Asked Questions Foreclosure What is a Foreclosure? How Can I Avoid A Foreclosure Once a Complaint Has Been Filed Against Me? Where is a Foreclosure Complaint Filed? What Should You Do if Served
More informationNINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2009-02 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER GOVERNING MANDATORY CIRCUIT COURT MEDIATION FOR OWNER-OCCUPIED
More information105-374. Foreclosure of tax lien by action in nature of action to foreclose a mortgage.
105-374. Foreclosure of tax lien by action in nature of action to foreclose a mortgage. (a) General Nature of Action. The foreclosure action authorized by this section shall be instituted in the appropriate
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 13 Case No. 09-14256 LELIA KENTON, Debtor LELIA KENTON Plaintiff Adv. Case No. 10-50909 v. FAST CASH REALTY, JEFFREY D.
More informationCase 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE JPMORGAN CHASE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All
More informationCase 1:05-cv-00050-GC Document 29 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 245 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 1:05-cv-00050-GC Document 29 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 245 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BUSINESS LENDERS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 05-50-B-C RITANNE CAVANAUGH GAZAK,
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as Bank of Am. v. Kuchta, 2012-Ohio-5562.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) BANK OF AMERICA Appellee C.A. No. 12CA0025-M v. GEORGE M. KUCHTA,
More informationInsight from Carlton Fields
Insight from Carlton Fields 2011 Nuts and Bolts of the Florida By Kathleen S. McLeroy Introduction Florida is a judicial foreclosure state. Mortgage foreclosures in Florida are judicial proceedings, and
More informationCase 08-06092-mhm Document 1 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 08-06092-mhm Document 1 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: JOHN WAYNE ATCHLEY and CASE NO. 05-79232-MHM ROBIN
More information(Space Above This Line For Recording Data) SECOND MORTGAGE
This document was prepared by: When recorded, please return to: Illinois Housing Development Authority 401 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 700 Chicago, IL 60611 Attn: Home Ownership Programs (Space Above This
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT. Case No. 2012-4691-CH OPINION AND ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JOHN E. BUTERBAUGH and CARRIE BUTERBAUGH, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 2012-4691-CH SELENE FINANCIAL, LP, JPMORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Champion ) Mortgage Company ) Plaintiff ) v. ) ) Naomi J. Carey, Heir and Personal ) Representative of the Estate of Dennis
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MARCH 13, 2015; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2014-CA-000056-MR RAMONA SPINKS, EXECUTRIX OF THE WILL OF BENJAMIN SPINKS, DECEASED APPELLANT APPEAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-000-l-blm Document 0 Filed 0 Page of 0 0 IN RE: ELEAZAR SALAZAR, Debtor, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. ELEAZAR SALAZAR, Appellant, Appellee. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationCase 06-03280 Document 35 Filed in TXSB on 11/27/06 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 06-03280 Document 35 Filed in TXSB on 11/27/06 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE DAVID WIMBERLY, CASE NO. 05-81669-G3-13 Debtor,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBRA R. JOYNER, Appellant, CASE NO.: 2012-CV-000003-A-O Lower Case No.: 2010-CC-010676-O v. ONE THOUSAND OAKS, INC.,
More informationCIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE GARNISHMENT CHAPTER 77
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE GARNISHMENT CHAPTER 77 77.01 Right to writ of garnishment.--every person or entity who has sued to recover a debt or has recovered judgment in any court against any person
More informationNorthern Insurance Company of New York v. Resinski
MONTGOMERY COUNTY LAW REPORTER 140-301 2003 MBA 30 Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Resinski [140 M.C.L.R., Part II Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Resinski APPEAL and ERROR Motion for Summary
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WINSTON-SALEM DIVISION
SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 22nd day of February, 2013. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WINSTON-SALEM DIVISION In re: Joseph Walter Melara and Shyrell Lynn Melara, Case No.
More informationHow To Decide If A Judgment Against A Man Is Valid
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION THE MOUNTBATTEN SURETY COMPANY, INC. : October Term, 2001 Plaintiff, : v. : No. 3341 LANDMARK
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : : FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT J. BIRCH, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION
More informationCHAPTER 32-19 FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES BY ACTION
CHAPTER 32-19 FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES BY ACTION 32-19-01. Action to foreclose mortgage on real estate authorized. The plaintiff shall bring an action in district court for the foreclosure
More informationv. VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF v. Plaintiff, Index No. VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT Defendant(s). Defendant answers as follows: I generally deny each allegation of the Complaint,
More informationMisc. Docket No. f ( '9256
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. f ( '9256 FINAL APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 735 AND 736 ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to Section 22.004 of the Texas Government Code,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. E. SCOTT BRADLEY SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE JUDGE 1 The Circle, Suite 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE E. SCOTT BRADLEY SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE JUDGE 1 The Circle, Suite 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 January 26, 2010 Robin M. Grogan, Esquire Bifferato Gentilotti LLC 800
More information2:09-cv-14271-LPZ-PJK Doc # 13 Filed 06/24/10 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:09-cv-14271-LPZ-PJK Doc # 13 Filed 06/24/10 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 09-14271 HON.
More informationjurisdiction is DENIED and plaintiff s motion for leave to amend is DENIED. BACKGROUND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 TRICIA LECKLER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Plaintiffs, CASHCALL, INC., Defendant. /
More informationRE: HF No. 173, 2009/10 Gary Timm v. Meade School District 46-1 and Associated School Boards of South Dakota Worker s Compensation Trust Fund
March 29, 2011 James D. Leach Attorney at Law 1617 Sheridan Lake Road Rapid City, SD 57702-3783 Jessica L. Filler Tieszen Law Office Prof. LLC PO Box 550 Pierre, SD 57501 Letter Decision and Order RE:
More information11 LC 14 0449ER A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
House Bill 338 By: Representative Bryant of the 160 th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 To amend Title 44 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to property,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-00873-JLK Document 60 Filed 07/20/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No.: 1:14-cv-00873-JLK DEBORAH CARTER, v. Plaintiff,
More informationA Guide To Understanding The Community Association Collection And Foreclosure Process
A Guide To Understanding The Community Association Collection And Foreclosure Process What is the initial demand letter? What is a Claim of Lien? What is a thirty (30) day letter? How do you foreclose
More informationJUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961
JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT
Filed 2/11/15 Estate of Thomson CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Bukowski, 2015 IL App (1st) 140780 Appellate Court Caption CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANNA BUKOWSKI and KATHERINE D. BUKOWSKI,
More informationGLOSSARY OF COLLECTION LAW TERMINOLOGY
GLOSSARY OF COLLECTION LAW TERMINOLOGY The purpose of this glossary is to assist community association board members and property managers in better understanding legal terms and procedures that are frequently
More informationWELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC. CHRISTOPHER E. SPAULDING et al. [ 1] Christopher E. and Lorraine M. Spaulding appeal from a judgment
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2007 ME 116 Docket: Cum-06-737 Submitted On Briefs: June 13, 2007 Decided: August 16, 2007 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, CALKINS,
More informationCase 6:14-bk-09462-CCJ Doc 48 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 7
Case 6:14-bk-09462-CCJ Doc 48 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 7 ORDERED. Dated: July 20, 2015 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION www.flmb.uscourts.gov In re: RICHARD S.
More informationReports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
More informationWARM SPRINGS TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 206 REAL PROPERTY SECURED TRANSACTIONS. Table of Contents
WARM SPRINGS TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 206 REAL PROPERTY SECURED TRANSACTIONS Table of Contents Page 206.001 Legislative History... 1 206.010 Tribal Court Jurisdiction... 1 206.015 Security Interests Created
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
REL: 6/30/11 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationTITLE XXIII CLAIMS FOR LITIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
RULE 231 (7/6/12) 153 TITLE XXIII CLAIMS FOR LITIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS RULE 230. GENERAL (a) Applicability: The Rules of this Title XXIII set forth the special provisions which apply to claims
More informationMOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER
MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT You (the defendant) have TWENTY (20) calendar days to file an answer to the small claims complaint. The
More informationReports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 112,493 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 112,493 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee, v. DELWIN CHRISTENSEN, a/k/a DELWIN W. CHRISTENSEN, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationTo help you better understand the foreclosure process, these definitions are presented in a logical order, rather than alphabetical order.
FORECLOSURE GLOSSARY NOTICE: This glossary of legal words and phrases related to foreclosure is provided to you by the Clermont County Common Pleas Court to help you better understand your legal problem
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO DEUTCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR SOUNDVIEW HOME LOAN TRUST 2005-OPTI, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-OPTI, Plaintiff, : Case
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationCOURT ORDER STANDARD OF REVIEW STATEMENT OF FACTS
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 Plaintiffs: JON C. COOK, an individual, and THE LUMBERYARDS DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., a Colorado Limited Liability Company,
More informationFinancial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge:
Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationHP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA J&K BODY SHOP, INC., ET AL., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) NO. CIV-11-0077-HE ) ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO., ) ET AL., ) ) Defendants.
More informationCALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656
CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any
More informationS14G1862. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. v. WEDEREIT. Brian Wedereit sued BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. f/k/a Countrywide
297 Ga. 313 FINAL COPY S14G1862. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. v. WEDEREIT. MELTON, Justice. Brian Wedereit sued BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing ( BAC ) for, among
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT
Filed 10/11/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT ED AGUILAR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B238853 (Los Angeles County
More informationCase 3:07-cv-01180-TEM Document 56 Filed 04/27/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:07-cv-01180-TEM Document 56 Filed 04/27/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION JAMES E. TOMLINSON and DARLENE TOMLINSON, his wife, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY JAMES B. ADAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LESTER GRIFFIN, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: August 8, 2014 Decided: Craig T. Eliassen, Esq.,
More informationForeclosure Report Survey of State Foreclosure Laws
Foreclosure Report Survey of State Foreclosure Laws State: Alabama Statutory citation: Ala. Code 35-10-1 to 35-10-30 and 6-5-247 to 6-5-256 Most Common Method of Foreclosure: Non-judicial; Power of Sale
More informationE-FILED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Peter MacKinnon, Jr. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CASE NO. 111 CV 193767
ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. ) adam@gutridesafier.com SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. ) seth@gutridesafier.com TODD KENNEDY (State Bar No. 0) todd@gutridesafier.com GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP Douglass Street San
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. JUNG BEA HAN and Case No. 00-42086 HYUNG SOOK HAN, v. Adv. No.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In Re JUNG BEA HAN and Case No. 00-42086 HYUNG SOOK HAN, Debtors. JUNG BEA HAN, Plaintiff. v. Adv. No. 05-03012 GE CAPITAL SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE
More informationNo. 3 09 0033 THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2009
No. 3 09 0033 Filed December 16, 2009 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2009 KEPPLE AND COMPANY, INC., ) Appeal from the Circuit Court an Illinois Corporation, ) of the 10th Judicial
More informationLoan Agreement (Short Form)
Loan Agreement (Short Form) Document 2050A Access to this document and the LeapLaw web site is provided with the understanding that neither LeapLaw Inc. nor any of the providers of information that appear
More information2015 ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT
Law Offices of Vortman & Feinstein A Partnership of Professional Service Corporations 520 Pike Street Tower, Ste. 2250 Seattle, Washington 98101 Marlin L. Vortman (206) 223-9595 Larry B. Feinstein Fax:
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
1 1 [attorney name redacted], Esq. (CSBN ///////////) ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// Attorneys for Defendant Mary Hinds Note: all names have been changed. Ted
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff(s), v. Defendant(s). / CASE NO.: GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION: UNIFORM FINAL JUDGMENT
More information1:09-cv-11534-TLL-CEB Doc # 120 Filed 08/11/10 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
1:09-cv-11534-TLL-CEB Doc # 120 Filed 08/11/10 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1393 BRAUN BUILDERS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, Case Number 09-11534-BC
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Order Number 2009-12-Civ
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Order Number 2009-12-Civ ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ESTABLISHING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FORECLOSURE PROCEDURES (a) Florida
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE COLLECTION PROCESS FOR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS
UNDERSTANDING THE COLLECTION PROCESS FOR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS 1. PRE-LITIGATION BY: MULCAHY LAW FIRM, P.C. Almost every community association has problems in collecting unpaid assessments. Most associations
More information526 East Main Street P.O. Box 2385 Alliance, OH 44601 Akron, OH 44309
[Cite as Lehrer v. McClure, 2013-Ohio-4690.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT RICHARD LEHRER, ET AL Plaintiffs-Appellees -vs- RALPH MCCLURE, ET AL Defendant-Appellant JUDGES
More informationCivil Suits: The Process
Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized
More informationCODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb0087-00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing
More informationCOLORADO FORECLOSURE LAWS
COLORADO FORECLOSURE LAWS Orten Cavanagh & Holmes, LLC Community Association Attorneys Denver Phone 720.221.9780 Fax 720.221.9781 Toll Free 888.841.5149 Colorado Springs Phone 719.457.8420 Fax 719.457.8419
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0236 444444444444 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., PETITIONER, v. PATRICK O BRIEN MURPHY A/K/A O BRIEN MURPHY AND BEVERLY MURPHY, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI SKY CANYON
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE B254585
Filed 2/26/15 Vega v. Goradia CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationTwin Holdings of Del. LLC v CW Capital, LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 31266(U) May 10, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 005193/09 Judge: Stephen A.
Twin Holdings of Del. LLC v CW Capital, LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 31266(U) May 10, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 005193/09 Judge: Stephen A. Bucaria Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationPATHS OF A FORECLOSURE IN NEW YORK STATE
PATHS OF A FORECLOSURE IN NEW YORK STATE BORROWER DELINQUENT 2-3 months late with mortgage payments Lender sends notices, bills, letters to borrower stating that he/she is delinquent Borrower has multiple
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF. Case No.
FORM 10A.71 INTERIM FACTORING FINANCING ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF In re: In Proceedings Under Chapter 11 Case No. Debtor. INTERIM ORDER APPROVING SECTION 364 FINANCING
More informationRepresenting Creditors in Consumer Bankruptcy Cases
4 Representing Creditors in Consumer Bankruptcy Cases Michael P. Hogan Craig B. Rule Marcy J. Ford John P. Kapitan I. Overview 4.1 II. General Considerations A. Filing Proofs of Claim 4.2 B. The Automatic
More information2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 10/15/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227
More informationv. Record No. 061373 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY June 8, 2007 CARLA VON NEUMANN-LILLIE
Present: All the Justices SETTLEMENT FUNDING, LLC v. Record No. 061373 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY June 8, 2007 CARLA VON NEUMANN-LILLIE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY M. Langhorne Keith,
More information