CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION SYSTEM FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION (PTC-CASEE) Review Cycle
|
|
|
- Earl Hudson
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PHILIPPINE TECHNOLOGICAL COUNCIL ACCREDITATION AND CERTIFICATION BOARD FOR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION SYSTEM FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION (PTC-CASEE) Document No. : ACGS-02 TITLE : GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF A SELF-STUDY REPORT Review Cycle DOCUMENT STATUS: Edition : 2012 Revision : 01 Prepared by : PTC TWG Authorized by : PTC BOT Issue Date : January 09, 2014 Copy No. : 01 PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 1 of 28
2 GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF A SELF-STUDY REPORT Review Cycle PHILIPPINE TECHNOLOGICAL COUNCIL ACCREDITATION AND CERTIFICATION BOARD FOR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION COMMISSION Postal Address : c/o PTC Executive Directorate Office Rm , National Engineering Center, F.Agoncillo St. corner Osmeña Ave., UP Diliman Quezon City, Philippines address : [email protected] Website : www:ptc.org.ph PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 2 of 28
3 Table of Contents Introduction Requirements and Preparations Supplemental Materials Submission and Distribution of Self Study Report and Supplemental Materials Confidentiality Self-Study Report Template Details Background Information A. Contact Information B. Program History C. Organization D. Delivery Modes E. Locations General Criteria for Baccalaureate Level Programs Criterion 1. Criterion 2. Criterion 3. Criterion 4. Criterion 5. Criterion 6. Criterion 7. Criterion 8. Criterion 9. Program Educational Objectives Student Outcomes Students Specific Program Criteria Appendices Faculty and Support Staff Curriculum Facilities and Learning Environment Leadership and Institutional Support Extension Service, Community-Oriented Programs and Industry-Academe Linkage Continuous Quality Improvement PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 3 of 28
4 Introduction The Self-Study Report (or SSR) provides a quantitative and qualitative assessment and evaluation of the strengths and limitations of the program being submitted for review to the Philippine Technological Council, Accreditation and Certification Board for Engineering and Technology and the Engineering Accreditation Commission (PTC-ACBET-EAC). The purpose of the SSR is to explain the extent to which the program meets applicable PTC-ACBET- EAC criteria and policies as documented in the PTC Certification and Accreditation System for Engineering Education (PTC-CASEE). The SSR will provide sufficient information for a thorough onsite review of the program. It is necessary that the SSR address all methods of instructional delivery used for the program, all possible paths that students may take to completion of the degree, and all remote offerings available to students in the program. The PTC-ACBET-EAC accreditation process gives an opportunity for the institution and the engineering program to address possible shortcomings, if any, identified during the on-site visit. After the institution receives a preliminary statement from ACBET, there is a brief period during which the institution can make corrective improvements before ACBET renders a recommendation decision on accreditation. Even when some shortcomings remain, the institution may address these for the next cycle of evaluation. The primary purpose of accreditation for engineering in the Philippines under PTC-CASEE is to assure a high quality of engineering education that will enable entry-level engineering professionals to be globally competitive. The Philippine Technological Council, for and in behalf of the Philippine jurisdiction, has been admitted as a Provisional Member Washington Accord since June 19, It is currently pursuing full signatory membership and is expecting to be admitted in due time. The admission of PTC to the Washington Accord is an initial recognition of PTC having achieved substantial degree of equivalency of its accreditation system, PTC-CASEE, with those of the signatories of Washington Accord. Moreover, this demonstrated that the graduates are educated in an engineering education program that is accredited in accordance with the said PTC-CASEE. Requirements and Preparation The program name used on the cover of the SSR must be identical to that used in the institutional publications, on the PTC-ACBET-EAC Initial Request for Evaluation (RFE), and on the transcripts of graduates. This will insure that the program is correctly identified in PTC-ACBET-EAC records and that graduates can be correctly identified as graduating from an accredited program. The Guidelines are intended to assist the institution and the engineering program to demonstrate that the program satisfies all the criteria (see Doc. ACGS-01) and related requirements of the PTC-CASEE. Thus it is important that the institution and the program administrators prepare the SSR to completely address all the criteria and conform to all the pertinent and relevant provisions therein. Necessarily, those responsible for the preparation of the SSR must always refer back and defer to the provisions of Doc. ACGS-01 on the accreditation criteria, should there be any conflict between the contents of the SSR Guidelines and the former. Tables in the Guidelines may be modified in format to more clearly present the information for the program. When this is done, it is suggested that a brief explanatory footnote be included about why PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 4 of 28
5 the table was modified. Rows may be added to or deleted from tables to better accommodate program information. The educational unit is the administrative unit having academic responsibility for the program(s) being reviewed by PTC-ACBET-EAC. For example, if more than one program is being reviewed, the educational unit is the administrative unit responsible for the collective group of programs being reviewed by PTC-ACBET-EAC. Supplemental Materials The following materials are to be supplied in addition to the Self-Study Report: The general institution catalog covering course details and other institutional information applicable at the time of the review. Promotional brochures or literature describing program offerings of the institution. Official transcripts of recent graduates. The team chair will request a specific number and method of selection of transcripts for each program and will provide a timeframe in which they should be provided to program evaluators. Each transcript is to be accompanied by the program requirements for the graduate and accompanied by worksheets that the program uses to show how the graduate has fulfilled program requirements. Submission and Distribution of Self-Study Report The Self Study Report (SSR) and Supplemental Materials shall be submitted as follows: To PTC-ACBET-EAC Headquarters at least sixty (60) calendar days prior to the targeted dates of the review visit: o Submit one copy of SSR including all appendices for each program o Submit one (1) set of the supplemental materials (minus the transcripts) to: Accreditation and Certification Board for Engineering & Technology PHILIPPINE TECHNOLOGICAL COUNCIL Postal Address: c/o PTC Executive Directorate Office Room National Engineering Center UP Campus, Diliman, Quezon City, 1101 Philippines Address : [email protected] To the Team Chair and to the Approved Observer(s) at least sixty (60) calendar days prior to the targeted dates of review visit: o Submit one copy of SSR including all appendices for each program o Submit one (1) set of the supplemental materials, and o Submit the requested transcripts for each program. To each of the Program Evaluators at least sixty (60) calendar days prior to the targeted dates of review visit: PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 5 of 28
6 o o o Submit one copy of SSR including all appendices for each corresponding program Submit one (1) set of the supplemental materials corresponding to the program, and Submit the requested transcripts for each corresponding program. The SSR and Supplemental Material shall be submitted on pdf read-only files on CD, DVD, or data stick. Each Self-Study Report Supplement Material must be self-contained in the medium submitted and must not include hot links. The submission cannot be a combination of hard copy and electronic file. submissions are not permitted. The team chair will provide instructions and addresses for the institution to provide a copy of the Self- Study Report (SSR) and Supplemental Material directly to the team chair and each program evaluator and approved observer, in electronic format or in hard copy format as maybe requested by the individual evaluator and approved observer. If hard copy format is opted for, this must be printed in A4 size bond paper. When new or updated material becomes available between the submission of the Self-Study Report and the date of the on-site review, the program must provide it to the team members as soon as possible but not later than upon the team s arrival for the on-site review. All such materials should also be sent to PTC Executive Directorate Office with contact addresses shown elsewhere in this SSR Guidelines. Confidentiality All information supplied is for the confidential use of PTC-ACBET-EAC and its authorized agents. It will not be disclosed without authorization of the institution concerned, except for summary data not identifiable to a specific institution, or information contained in documents in the public domain. SSR Template The following pages constitute the template for the SSR. PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 6 of 28
7 ACGS -02 SELF STUDY REPORT GUIDELINES PTC-ACBET-EAC Self-Study Report for the <Program Name> at <Higher Educational Institution Name> <Location> <Date> CONFIDENTIAL The information supplied in this Self-Study Report is for the confidential use of PTC-ACBET- EAC and its authorized agents, and will not be disclosed without authorization of the institution concerned, except for summary data not identifiable to a specific institution. PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 7 of 28
8 ACGS -02 SELF STUDY REPORT GUIDELINES BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. Contact Information Provide name, mailing address, phone number, fax number, and address for the primary contact person for the program. The primary contact person shall have the authority from the institution to transact business with PTC-ACBET-EAC on any and all arrangements related to the accreditation review process. B. Program History Include the year the program was implemented and the date of accreditation by a previous accreditation agency in the Philippines, if applicable. Include historical data on annual enrollments and annual graduation for the program. C. Organization Describe the administrative structure of the program (from the program to the department, college, and upper administration of your institution, as appropriate). D. Delivery Modes Describe the delivery modes used by this program, e.g., days, evenings, weekends, cooperative education, traditional lecture/laboratory, off-campus, distance education, web-based, etc. E. Locations Provide all locations where the program or a portion of the program is regularly offered (this would also include dual degrees, international partnerships, etc.). I. GENERAL CRITERIA FOR BACCALAUREATE LEVEL PROGRAMS CRITERION 1. PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES A. Vision and Mission Statement Provide the institutional vision and mission statements. B. Program Educational Objectives (PEO) List the program educational objectives, and state where the general public can find these. C. Consistency of the Program Educational Objectives with the Vision and Mission of the Institution Describe how the program educational objectives are consistent with the vision and mission of the institution. D. Program Constituencies List the program constituencies. Describe how the program educational objectives meet the needs of these constituencies. PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 8 of 28
9 ACGS -02 SELF STUDY REPORT GUIDELINES E. Process for Formulation, Review and Revision of the Program Educational Objectives Describe the process for the formulation and periodic review and revision, as necessary, of the program educational objectives including how the program s various constituencies are involved in this process. Include the results of this process and provide a description of any changes that were made to the program educational objectives and the timeline associated with those changes since the last general review. Survey results and such other information as maybe available which are used in the process of formulation, review and revision of PEO shall be referenced in the appropriate section of the SSR and be made available during the review visits F. Deployment Process of PEO Describe how the PEO is deployed among the various program stakeholders and constituencies. Provide demonstration of compliance. CRITERION 2. STUDENT OUTCOMES A. Student Outcomes List the student outcomes for the program and indicate where the student outcomes are documented. If the student outcomes are stated differently than those listed in Criterion 2 of the PTC CASEE, provide a mapping of the said listed student outcomes to those of the PTC-ACBET- EAC Student Outcomes. B. Relationship of Student Outcomes to Program Educational Objectives Explain how the student outcomes prepare graduates to attain the program educational objectives. C. Process for the Formulation, Review and Revision of Student Outcomes Describe the process for the formulation, periodic review and revision of student outcomes. Include the results of this process and provide a description of any changes that were made to the student outcomes and the timeline associated with the changes. D. Performance Indicators for each of the Student Outcome Show the performance indicators for each of the student outcome and describe the monitoring, assessment and evaluation process. (Note: The actual assessment and evaluation of data are under criterion 9.) E. Deployment Process of Student Outcomes Describe how the student outcomes are deployed among all stakeholders, faculty, staff and students. Provide proof of compliance. PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 9 of 28
10 ACGS -02 SELF STUDY REPORT GUIDELINES CRITERION 3. STUDENTS Include written policies in place and applied to the following: A. Student Admissions Summarize the requirements and process for accepting new students into the program. B. Evaluating Student Performance Summarize the process for evaluating student performance. Include a discussion on how student outcomes are included in the evaluation of student performance. C. Monitoring Student Progress Summarize the process for monitoring student progress. Include documented information on how the program ensures that students meet prerequisites, and how exceptions are handled. Include a discussion on how monitoring ensures that the schedule of courses for each semester or term for each student takes into account an appropriate progression of learning the student outcomes. D. Retention Describe the retention process, criteria and program for the students. E. Transfer Students and Transfer Courses Summarize the requirements and process for accepting transfer students and transfer credits. F. Advising and Career Guidance Summarize the process for advising and providing career guidance to students, on career paths for the profession associated with the program. Include information on how often students are advised, who provides the advising (program faculty, departmental, college or university advisor). G. Work in Lieu of Courses Summarize the requirements and process for awarding credit for work in lieu of courses, if any. This could include such things as life experience, Advanced Placement, dual enrollment, test out, military experience, etc. H. Graduation Requirements Summarize the promotion and graduation requirements for the program and the documented process for monitoring and ensuring that each graduate completes all graduation requirements for the program. The documentation should include all documented approved exceptions for each student (e.g. course substitutions, waivers of prerequisites, etc.). State the name of the degree awarded (Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering, etc.) I. Transcripts of Recent Graduates Provide transcripts from some of the most recent graduates to the visiting team along with any needed explanation of how the transcripts are to be interpreted. These transcripts will be PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 10 of 28
11 ACGS -02 SELF STUDY REPORT GUIDELINES provided to the Team Chair and the Program Evaluator. The Team Chair will specify how the transcripts are to be selected. State how the program and any program options are designated on the transcript. J. Academic Exchange Describe the process of academic exchange, if currently practiced. Notes: Provide supporting report/ data on applicable items. Provide list of documented procedures as applicable to above activities. Ensure that the students continually achieve desired learning outcomes. CRITERION 4. FACULTY AND SUPPORT STAFF A. Faculty Qualifications Describe the qualifications of the faculty and how they are adequate to cover all the curricular areas of the program. Include the composition, size, credentials, and faculty experience. Complete ACGS-02 Table 4-1. For each major course in the curriculum, show that there are at least two faculty members who are capable of teaching the subject. Include faculty resumés in Appendix B. B. Faculty Workload Complete ACGS-02 Table 4-2, Faculty Workload Summary, and describe this information in terms of workload expectations or requirements. Note: The program must not be critically dependent on a single faculty. C. Faculty Activities Discuss the adequacy of the size of the faculty and describe the extent and quality of faculty involvement in interactions with students, monitoring of student progress, student advising and counselling, career guidance, university service activities, professional development, and interactions with industrial and professional practitioners including employers of students. Describe how these activities impact the achievement of specific student outcomes. D. Professional Development Describe the faculty professional development activities, in accordance with the institution s professional development program. Provide a copy of the Professional Development Plan for the previous and current years. Provide sample of results of the completed professional development activity. Describe how the specific training program supports relevant student outcome(s). E. Authority and Responsibility of Faculty Describe the role played by the faculty with respect to their guidance of the program, and in the development and implementation of the processes for the evaluation, assessment, and continuing improvement of the program. Describe the roles of others on campus, e.g., dean or provost, with PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 11 of 28
12 ACGS -02 SELF STUDY REPORT GUIDELINES respect to these areas. Show samples of Roles/ Responsibilities or equivalent form acknowledged or signed by the faculty. F. Evaluation Method To Determine Educational Contributions of Faculty Member Describe the evaluation method to determine the educational contributions of faculty members. Provide supporting data. Demonstrate how it affects relevant student outcome(s). G. Support staff Describe the adequacy of the support staff. Include a description of the workload and a description of staff development. Provide the personnel development plan for each support group for the previous and current years. Provide sample of results of the completed training. Describe how the specific training program supports the relevant student outcome(s). PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 12 of 28
13 Rank¹ Type of Academic Appointment² T,TT, NTT FT or PT⁴ Gov t/ Industrial Practice Teaching This Institution Professional Registration/ Certification Professional Organizations Professional Development Consulting/Summer Work in Industry PTC - AC BE T-E AC Table 4-1. Faculty Qualifications Name of Program: Years of Experience Level of Activity H, M or L³ Faculty Name Highest Degree Earned- Field and Year Instructions: Complete table for each member of the faculty in the program. Add additional rows or use additional sheets if necessary. Updated information is to be provided at the time of the visit. 1. Code: P = Professor ASC = Associate Professor AST = Assistant Professor I = Instructor A = Adjunct O = Other 2. Code: TT = Tenure Track T = Tenured NTT = Non Tenure Track 3. The level of activity, high, medium or low, should reflect an average over the year prior to the visit plus the two previous years at the institution 4. Part Time (PT) or Full Time (FT) at the institution PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 13 of 28
14 Table 4-2. Faculty Workload Summary Name of Program: Program Activity Distribution 3 Faculty Member (name) PT or FT 1 Classes Taught (Course No./Credit Hrs.) Term and Year 2 Teaching Research or Scholarship Other 4 % of Time Devoted to the Program 5 Notes: 1. FT = Full Time Faculty or PT = Part Time Faculty, at the institution 2. For the academic year for which the self-study is being prepared. 3. Program activity distribution should be in percent of effort in the program and should total 100%. 4. Indicate sabbatical leave, etc., under "Other." 5. For FT: Out of the total time employed at the institution; For PT: % employment with the program PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 14 of 28
15 CRITERION 5. CURRICULUM A. Program Curriculum 1. Complete Table 5-1 that describes the plan of study for students in this program including information on course offerings in the form of a recommended schedule by year and term along with average section enrollments for all courses in the program over the two years immediately preceding the visit. State whether you are on quarters or semesters and complete a separate table for each option (if any) in the program. 2. Describe how the curriculum aligns with the program educational objectives. 3. Describe how the curriculum and its associated prerequisite structure support the attainment of the student outcomes. 4. Describe the process of curriculum mapping and change. Provide latest samples of curriculum or course improvement and changes. Describe how the improvements support the student outcomes. 5. Attach a flowchart or worksheet that illustrates the prerequisite structure of the program s required courses. 6. For each curricular area specifically addressed by either the general criteria or the specific program criteria as shown in Table 5-1, describe how your program meets the specific requirements for this program area. 7. Describe the major design experience that prepares students for engineering practice. Describe how this experience is based upon the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier coursework, and incorporate appropriate engineering standards and multiple design constraints. 8. Describe the industry-academe linkage, such as on-the-job training to satisfy curricular requirements specifically addressed by either the general or program criteria. Describe the academic component of this experience and how the program evaluates this. 9. Describe the adequacy of laboratory courses in the curriculum. Include a discussion of class sizes, number of identical experimental set-ups, and number of students in an experiment group. Describe how it supports the applicable student outcomes. 10. Describe the materials (course syllabi, textbooks, sample student work, etc.), which will be available for review during the visit to demonstrate achievement related to this criterion. B. Course Syllabi In Appendix A, include a syllabus for each course used to satisfy the mathematics, science, and discipline-specific requirements required by Criterion 5 or any applicable program criteria. For required courses with multiple sections that do not use a common syllabus, include a syllabus for each of the different sections. PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 15 of 28
16 Table 5-1 Curriculum Name of Program : Course (Department, Number, Title) List all courses in the program by term starting with first term of first year and ending with the last term of the final year. Indicate Whether Course is Required, Elective or a Selected Elective by an R, an E or an SE. 2 Math & Basic Sciences Curricular Area (Credit Hours) Engineering Topics Check if Contains Significant Design ( ) General Education Other Last Two Terms the Course was Offered: Year and, Semester, or Quarter Average Section Enrollment for the Last Two Terms the Course was Offered 1 Add rows as needed to show all courses in the curriculum. OVERALL TOTAL CREDIT HOURS FOR THE DEGREE Semester Credit Hours or percentage of total Suggested PTC- CABECT-EAC credit hours or percentage Semester Credit Hours 32 Hours 48 Hours Percentage 25% 37.5 % 1. For courses that include multiple elements (lecture, laboratory, recitation, etc.), indicate the average enrollment in each element. 2. Required courses are required of all students in the program, elective courses are optional for students, and selected electives are courses where students must take one or more courses from a specified group. Instructional materials and student work verifying compliance with PTC-CABECT-EAC criteria for the categories indicated above will be required during the campus visit. PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 16 of 28
17 CRITERION 6. FACILITIES AND LEARNING ENVIRONMENT A. Offices, Classrooms and Laboratories Summarize each of the program s facilities in terms of their ability to support the attainment of the program educational objectives and student outcomes and to provide an atmosphere conducive to learning. 1. Offices (such as administrative, faculty, clerical, and teaching assistants) and any associated equipment that is typically available there. 2. Classrooms and associated equipment that is typically available where the program courses are taught. 3. Laboratory facilities including those containing computers (describe available hardware and software) and the associated tools and equipment that support instruction. Include those facilities used by students in the program even if they are not dedicated to the program, and state the times they are available to students. Indicate adequacy of the number of identical laboratory set-ups and typical class size. Discuss instruction on safety practices and safety environments (e.g. proper grounding of electrical convenience outlets, safety masks, etc.) Provide Appendix C containing a listing of the major pieces of equipment used by the program in support of instruction. B. Computing Resources Describe IT policy. Describe any computing resources (workstations, servers, storage, networks including software) in addition to those described in the laboratories in Part A, which are used by the students in the program. Include a discussion of the accessibility of university-wide computing resources available to all students via various locations such as student housing, library, student union, off-campus, etc. State the hours the various computing facilities are open to students. Assess the adequacy of these facilities to support the scholarly and professional activities of the students and faculty in the program. Define the student outcomes which are highly affected by computing resources and provide data to demonstrate the intended impact on student outcomes. C. Guidance Describe how students in the program are provided appropriate guidance regarding the use of the tools, equipment, computing resources, and laboratories including instructions on safety practices.. Provide list of applicable documents. D. Maintenance and Upgrading of Facilities Describe the policies and procedures for maintaining and upgrading the tools, equipment, computing resources, and laboratories used by students and faculty in the program. Provide list of applicable documents. Define the relevant student outcome (SO) and provide the performance data to demonstrate the alignment. PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 17 of 28
18 E. Library Services Describe and evaluate the capability of the library (or libraries) to serve the program including the adequacy of the library s technical collection relative to the needs of the program and the faculty, the adequacy of the process by which faculty may request the library to order books or subscriptions, the library s systems for locating and obtaining electronic information, and any other library services relevant to the needs of the program. Define relevant student outcomes which are highly affected by library service and provide performance data. F. Overall Comments on Facilities Describe how the program ensures that the facilities, tools, and equipment used in the program are safe for their intended purposes. Provide list of applicable documents. Define performance indicator for safety and provide data.. CRITERION 7. LEADERSHIP AND INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT A. Leadership Describe the leadership of the program and discuss its adequacy to ensure the quality and continuity of the program and how the leadership is involved in decisions that affect the program. Provide the organizational chart and corresponding functional descriptions and relationships. B. Program Budget and Financial Support 1. Describe the process used to establish the program s budget and provide evidence of continuity of institutional support for the program. Include the sources of financial support including both permanent (recurring) and temporary (one-time) funds. 2. Describe how the institution supports teaching in terms of graders, teaching assistants, teaching workshops, etc. 3. To the extent not described above, describe how resources are provided to acquire, maintain and upgrade the infrastructures, facilities and equipment used in the program. 4. Assess the adequacy of the resources described in this section with respect to the students in the program being able to attain the student outcomes. Describe how the results of the monitoring, assessment and evaluation of attainment of student outcomes impact on the program budget and financial support. C. Staffing Describe the adequacy of the staff (administrative, instructional, and technical) and institutional services provided to the program. Discuss methods used to retain and train staff. Describe Program Retention for support staff and provide data of implementation. D. Faculty Hiring and Retention 1. Describe the process for hiring of new faculty. 2. Describe strategies used to retain current qualified faculty. Provide report on retention. PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 18 of 28
19 E. Support of Faculty Professional Development Describe the adequacy of support for faculty professional development and how activities such as sabbaticals, travel, workshops, seminars, etc., are planned and supported. Describe the system or procedures on the generation of Professional Development Plan. CRITERION 8. EXTENSION SERVICE, COMMUNITY SERVICE, AND INDUSTRY-ACADEME LINKAGE A. Extension Service Describe non-degree educational services such as short courses on new technologies and new professional topics, to assist engineers from industry in keeping abreast of new developments in the field. Some short courses may provide summaries of findings from the research of faculty. New courses may be developed with collaboration from industry and engineering societies. Provide data to demonstrate compliance. Define the student outcome(s) impacted by the extension service and provide performance monitoring data as maybe necessary. B. Community Oriented Programs Provide evidence that students and student organizations have programs to assist communities not only as an avenue for societal service but also to gain understanding of the impact of engineering solutions to the local context. Possible projects may involve assistance to high school students on potential science/engineering fairs. Community-oriented projects may involve helping design low-cost computing, low-cost access to the Internet, and general utilization of their technological expertise. Dialogs with the communities to determine their needs should be explored first. Provide data to demonstrate compliance to the sub-provision of the Criterion. Define the student outcomes being supported by the programs and projects and include performance monitoring data. C. Industry-Academe Linkage a. Describe regular active participation from industry in planning and defining program educational objectives, student outcomes and curricula to ensure that these are relevant and up-to date with societal and professional requirements. b. Describe faculty/student-industry exposure through internships, industry-visits, collaborative projects under professionals in industry, and industry-based final year projects. c. Provide data to demonstrate performance. Define student outcome(s) supported by the activities and include performance monitoring data. CRITERION 9. CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT This section of your SSR should document your processes for regularly assessing and evaluating the extent to which student outcomes and the program educational objectives are being attained. This section should also document the extent to which the student outcomes and the program educational objectives are being attained. It should describe how the results of these evaluations are being utilized to effect continuous improvement of the program. PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 19 of 28
20 Although the program can report its processes as it chooses, the following is presented as a guide to help you organize your SSR. It is also recommended that you report the information concerning your program educational objectives separately from the information concerning your student outcomes. A. Student Outcomes It is recommended that this section include (a table may be used to present this information): 1. A listing and description of the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each student outcome is based. Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, specific exam questions, student portfolios, internally developed assessment exams, senior project presentations, nationally-normed exams, oral exams, focus groups, industrial advisory committee meetings, or other processes that are relevant and appropriate to the program. 2. A listing and description of the evaluation processes for each of the student outcomes. 3. The frequency with which these assessment and evaluation processes are carried out. 4. The expected satisfactory level of attainment for each of the student outcomes. As much as possible, include report on the performance indicators for each of the student outcome. 5. Summaries of the results of the evaluation process and an analysis illustrating the extent to which each of the student outcomes is being attained. 6. Continuous improvement actions undertaken and any significant future improvement plans. 7. Documentation and maintenance of the results. B. Program Educational Objectives It is recommended that this section include (a table may be used to present this information): 1. A listing and description of the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each program educational objective is based. Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, employer surveys, graduate surveys, focus groups, industrial advisory committee meetings, or other processes that are relevant and appropriate to the program. 2. A listing and description of the evaluation processes used for each of the program educational objectives. 3. The frequency with which these assessment and evaluation processes are carried out. 4. The expected satisfactory level of attainment for each of the program educational objectives. A report to show level of attainment shall be available made available. PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 20 of 28
21 5. Summaries of the results of the evaluation processes and an analysis illustrating the extent to which each of the program educational objectives is being attained. 6. Continuous improvement actions undertaken and any significant future improvement plans. 7. How the results are documented and maintained. Provide samples of results. C. Continuous Improvement Describe how the results of evaluation processes for the program educational objectives and the student outcomes and any other available information have been used as input in the continuous improvement of the program. Provide a list of continuous improvement actions taken and include results of the actions taken. Likewise, indicate any significant future program improvement plans based upon recent evaluations. Provide a brief rationale for each of these planned changes. D. Maintenance of Continuous Quality Improvement Program Discuss how the Continuous Quality Improvement program is maintained including a description of how records are kept and a discussion of resources needed for the maintenance of the program. E. Additional Information Copies of any of the assessment instruments or materials must be available for review at the time of the visit. Other information such as minutes from meetings where the assessment results were evaluated and where recommendations for action were made could also be included. II. SPECIFIC PROGRAM CRITERIA Describe how the program satisfies any applicable specific program criteria. covered elsewhere in the self-study report, provide appropriate references If already PTC-ACBET-EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 21 of 28
22 APPENDICES Appendix A Course Syllabi Use the following format for the course syllabi (typically 2 pages in Times New Roman or similar 12 point font) 1. Course number and name 2. Credits and contact hours 3. Instructor s or course coordinator s name 4. Text book, title, author, and year a. other supplemental materials 5. Specific course information a. brief description of the content of the course (catalog description) b. prerequisites or co-requisites c. indication of whether a required, elective, or selected elective (as per Table 5-1) course in the program 6. Specific Course objectives and outcomes a. specific outcomes of instruction, example: The student will be able to explain the significance of current research about a particular topic. b. explicit indication of which student outcomes listed in Criterion 2 or any other outcomes are addressed by the course. Course/topic outcomes mapped against the student outcomes in Criterion 2 should be made available during the course of the accreditation review. 7. List of topics to be covered PTC_ACBET_EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 22 of 28
23 Appendix B Faculty Vitae Use the following format for the faculty vitae (2 pages maximum in Times New Roman or equivalent 12 point type) 1. Name of Faculty 2. Education degree, discipline, institution, year 3. Academic experience institution, rank, title (chair, coordinator, etc. if appropriate), when (ex ), full time or part time 4. Non-academic experience company or entity, title, brief description of position, when (ex ), full time or part time 5. Certifications or professional registrations 6. Current membership in professional organizations 7. Honors and awards 8. Service activities (within and outside of the institution) 9. Briefly list the most important publications and presentations from the past five years title, co-authors if any, where published and/or presented, date of publication or presentation 10. Briefly list the most recent professional development activities PTC_ACBET_EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 23 of 28
24 Appendix C Equipment List the major pieces of equipment used by the program in support of instruction. PTC_ACBET_EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 24 of 28
25 Appendix D Institutional Summary Programs are requested to provide the following information. 1. The Institution a. Name and address of the institution b. Name and title of the chief executive officer of the institution c. Name and title of the person submitting the self-study report. d. Name the organizations by which the institution is now accredited and the dates of the initial and most recent accreditation evaluations. 2. Type of Control Description of the type of managerial control of the institution, e.g., private-non-profit, private-other, denominational, state, federal, public-other, etc 3. Educational Unit Describe the educational unit in which the program is located including the administrative chain of responsibility from the individual responsible for the program to the chief executive officer of the institution. Include names and titles. An organization chart may be included. 4. Academic Support Units List the names and titles of the individuals responsible for each of the units that teach courses required by the program being evaluated, e.g., mathematics, physics, etc. 5. Non-academic Support Units List the names and titles of the individuals responsible for each of the units that provide non-academic support to the program being evaluated, e.g., library, computing facilities, placement, tutoring, etc. 6. Credit Unit It is assumed that one semester or quarter credit normally represents one class hour or three laboratory hours per week. One academic year normally represents at least 28 weeks of classes, exclusive of final examinations. If other standards are used for this program, the differences should be indicated. 7. Tables Complete the following tables for the program undergoing evaluation. PTC_ACBET_EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 25 of 28
26 Total Undergraduates Total Gradeuates PTC - AC BE T-E AC Table D-1. Program Enrollment and Degree Data Name of the Program: Academic Year Enrollment Year Degrees Awarded 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Associates Bachelors Masters Doctorates Current FT Year PT 1 FT PT 2 FT PT 3 FT PT 4 FT PT Give official term enrollment figures (head count) for the current and preceding four academic years and undergraduate and graduate degrees conferred during each of those years. The "current" year means the academic year preceding the accreditation visit. FT--full time PT--part time PTC_ACBET_EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 26 of 28
27 Table D-2. Personnel Name of the Program: Year 1 : Administrative 3 HEAD COUNT FTE 2 FT PT Faculty (tenure-track) Other Faculty (excluding student Assistants) Student Teaching Assistants Student Research Assistants Technicians/Specialists Office/Clerical Employees Others 4 Report data for the program being evaluated Data on this table should be for the fall term immediately preceding the visit. Updated tables for the fall term when the ABET team is visiting are to be prepared and presented to the team when they arrive. For student teaching assistants, 1 FTE equals 20 hours per week of work (or service). For undergraduate and graduate students, 1 FTE equals 15 semester credit-hours (or 24 quarter credit-hours) per term of institutional course work, meaning all courses science, humanities and social sciences, etc. For faculty members, 1 FTE equals what your institution defines as a full-time load. Persons holding joint administrative/faculty positions or other combined assignments should be allocated to each category according to the fraction of the appointment assigned to that category. Specify any other category considered appropriate, or leave blank. PTC_ACBET_EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 27 of 28
28 Signature Attesting to Compliance By signing below, I attest to the following: That (Name of the Program Chair and Name of the Program(s)) has conducted an honest assessment of compliance and has provided a complete and accurate disclosure of timely information regarding compliance with PTC-ACBET-EAC Certification and Accreditation System for Engineering Education (CASEE) to include the General Criteria and any applicable Specific Program Criteria, and the PTC-ACBET-EAC accreditation policies and procedures. Dean s Name (As indicated on the RFE) Signature Date PTC_ACBET_EAC Document ACGS-02 Rev.01 Page 28 of 28
ABET SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE: TEMPLATE FOR A SELF-STUDY REPORT 2011-2012 Review Cycle
ABET SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE: TEMPLATE FOR A SELF-STUDY REPORT 2011-2012 Review Cycle ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION COMMISSION ABET, Inc. 111 Market Place, Suite 1050 Baltimore, MD 21202-4012 Phone: 410-347-7000
Part III. Self-Study Report Template
Part 3 Ministry Of Education And Higher Education Directorate General of Higher Education Part III Self-Study Report Template LABE SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE http://www.labe.org.lb General Instructions Introduction
Evaluation of Undergraduate Academic Programs. Self-Study Guidelines
Evaluation of Undergraduate Academic Programs Self-Study Guidelines Office of the Provost Fall 2009 Purpose This guide is designed to support academic unit efforts to evaluate undergraduate academic programs
2011 Outcomes Assessment Accreditation Handbook
2011 Outcomes Assessment Accreditation Handbook Associate Degree Programs Baccalaureate Degree Programs Master Degree Programs Accreditation Policies can be found in a separate document on the ATMAE website
ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION SYSTEM FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION (CASEE)
PHILIPPINE TECHNOLOGICAL COUNCIL ACCREDITATION AND CERTIFICATION BOARD FOR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION SYSTEM FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION
SELF-STUDY FORMAT FOR REVIEW OF EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAMS
SELF-STUDY FORMAT FOR REVIEW OF EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAMS Although programs engage in continual self-assessment and review of their work, periodic program reviews are designed to provide a broader view
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR DOCUMENT 102 SELF STUDY (A STAND-ALONE DOCUMENT; NOT INTENDED TO BE A PART OF A DOCUMENT 102)
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR DOCUMENT 102 SELF STUDY (A STAND-ALONE DOCUMENT; NOT INTENDED TO BE A PART OF A DOCUMENT 102) Context of Accreditation in the United States Program accreditation is both a
PROPOSAL TO IMPLEMENT A NEW ACADEMIC PROGRAM (Major, Minor, Master s, Dual Degree, or Certificate)
PROPOSAL TO IMPLEMENT A NEW ACADEMIC PROGRAM (Major, Minor, Master s, Dual Degree, or Certificate) New academic programs must be approved by the AAC/Grad Council, Faculty Plenary, VPAA, Board of Trustees,
9. ACADEMIC QUALITY PLANNING PROCESS AND OUTCOME ASSESSMENT
Page 1 of 32 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITATION OF POSTSECONDARY CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION DEGREE PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. GOVERNANCE AND ADMINISTRATION 3. CURRICULUM 4. FACULTY
GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY. Texas Southern University
GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY Texas Southern University The Purposes of Graduate Program Review Graduate program review at Texas Southern University exists to ensure that programs are functioning at the
Guidelines for Massachusetts Early Educator Preparation Programs Participating in the Early Childhood Educator Scholarships Program.
Guidelines for Massachusetts Early Educator Preparation Programs Participating in the Early Childhood Educator Scholarships Program Background The Departments of Higher Education and Early Education and
Preparing the Self-Study Report for Engineering
Preparing the Self-Study Report for Engineering Jeffrey W. Fergus Auburn University Member of ABET EAC Executive Committee 2015 ABET Symposium April 23-24, 2015 Disclaimer The information presented here
Academic Program Review Handbook
Handbook Continuously Improving Programs and Student Learning Revised July 2014 Original Issue: December 6, 2010 Approved: Derry Connolly, President Current Issue: July 3, 2014 Effective: July 3, 2014
Standard 2: The program shall have an explicit philosophical statement and clearly defined knowledge base.
Council for Standards in Human Service Education National Standards MASTER S DEGREE IN HUMAN SERVICES http://www.cshse.org 2013 (2010, 2009) I. GENERALPROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS A. Institutional Requirements
Doctor of Education Higher Education with Concentration in Community College Administration Program Handbook
Doctor of Education Higher Education with Concentration in Community College Administration Program Handbook College of Education Graduate Education and Research Texas Tech University Box 41071 Lubbock,
INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITATION SELF STUDY GUIDE INTRODUCTION
INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITATION SELF STUDY GUIDE INTRODUCTION Degree granting institutions in New York State may designate the New York State Board of Regents and the Commissioner of Education as their nationally
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL Purpose: To consider all matters relating to graduate programs at Tarleton State University and to recommend practices and procedures
Master of Health Care Administration Program Strategic Plan 2008 2010
Master of Health Care Administration Program Strategic Plan 2008 2010 The faculty and staff of the MHA program met and developed the following document. Included are foundational statements that include:
Staff Analysis Checklist Request to Offer a New Degree Program. Board of Governors, State University System of Florida
Staff Analysis Checklist Request to Offer a New Degree Program Board of Governors, State University System of Florida University Submitting Proposal Initial Review Date Proposed Implementation Term Last
TITLE 135 PROCEDURAL RULE WEST VIRGINIA COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION
TITLE 135 PROCEDURAL RULE WEST VIRGINIA COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION SERIES 11 DEGREE DESIGNATION, GENERAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NEW PROGRAM APPROVAL, AND DISCONTINUANCE OF EXISTING
DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)
Approved by Academic Affairs May 2010 DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP) I. DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING RTP POLICY A. Preamble B.
QUALITY ASSURANCE HANDBOOK. Policies, procedures and resources to guide undergraduate and graduate program development and improvement at UOIT
QUALITY ASSURANCE HANDBOOK Policies, procedures and resources to guide undergraduate and graduate program development and improvement at UOIT UOIT Academic Council June 15, 2010, revised June 9, 2011 QUALITY
University Of Alaska Anchorage College Of Health Department Of Human Services. Criteria and Guidelines For Faculty Evaluation
University Of Alaska Anchorage College Of Health Department Of Human Services Criteria and Guidelines For Faculty Evaluation This document is to be used in conjunction with the UNAC and UAFT Collective
University of Delaware College of Health Sciences Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition
University of Delaware College of Health Sciences Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION, TENURE AND REVIEW I. INTRODUCTION The mission of the Department of Behavioral Health
College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science
College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science Guidelines for Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering Focus Area: Security Last Updated October 2012. I. INTRODUCTION The College
Deploying Professionally Qualified Faculty: An Interpretation of AACSB Standards An AACSB White Paper issued by:
Deploying Professionally Qualified Faculty: An Interpretation of AACSB Standards An AACSB White Paper issued by: AACSB Accreditation Coordinating Committee AACSB Accreditation Quality Committee January
AACSB Self Evaluation Report Documentation. Supporting Materials and Timeline
AACSB Self Evaluation Report Documentation Supporting Materials and Timeline The Self Evaluation Report is a critical document in achieving initial accreditation. Ours is due May 15, 2012. To reach this
National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education. http://www.cshse.org 2013 (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)
Council for Standards in Human Service Education National Standards ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN HUMAN SERVICES http://www.cshse.org 2013 (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009) I. GENERAL PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS A. Institutional
Business Accreditation Eligibility Application
Business Accreditation Eligibility Application The purpose of this application is to determine if the school meets AACSB s eligibility criteria outlined in AACSB s Standards for Business Accreditation.
Template for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic)
Template for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic) Standard One: Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness
INTERIM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ON TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED COURSES AND PROGRAMS
INTERIM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ON TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED COURSES AND PROGRAMS I. Rationale The primary purposes of instructional technology are to facilitate effective instruction and enhance student learning,
Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation
Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration ACCREDITATION STANDARDS For Master s degree programs Adopted October 16, 2009 at the NASPAA
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY HONORS COLLEGE POLICY HANDBOOK
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY HONORS COLLEGE POLICY HANDBOOK PURPOSE This handbook offers basic information about the procedures and practices of the Honors College at Marshall University. The information presented
Faculty Online Credentialing System (FOCS) Office of the Senior Vice President and Provost Virginia Tech
Faculty Online Credentialing System (FOCS) Office of the Senior Vice President and Provost Virginia Tech All instructors of record at Virginia Tech must meet the credentialing requirements outlined in
ENGINEERING PHYSICS (EE)
The University of Connecticut School of Engineering ENGINEERING PHYSICS (EE) GUIDE TO COURSE SELECTION AY 2003-2004 for Engineering Physics (EngPhys) Majors in the School of Engineering and College of
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the 2011-2012 Accreditation Cycle
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the 2011-2012 Accreditation Cycle Definitions While ABET recognizes and supports the prerogative of institutions to adopt
4. Appendices - supplemental information that supports the documentation related to the standards provided in the report.
Oklahoma Board of Nursing 2915 North Classen Boulevard, Suite 524 Oklahoma City, OK 73106 (405) 962-1800 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEY VISITS OF NURSING EDUCATION PROGRAMS Preparing for the Survey Visit Each nursing
ACCREDITATION CRITERIA
ACCREDITATION CRITERIA STANDALONE BACCALAUREATE PROGRAMS ADOPTED JUNE 2013 AMENDED JUNE 2014 Council on Education for Public Health 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 220 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Phone: (202) 789-1050
These procedures describe the process used to grant the student appropriate academic credit by each of these methods as follows.
OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Credit for Prior Learning Credit for prior learning by a student admitted to OIT may be granted through a number of independent processes. These include: A) Transfer Credit;
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY. The Graduate School. Graduate Degree Program Review. Revised Format for the Self-Study Report
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Graduate Degree Program Review Revised Format for the Self-Study Report Instructions: Designed for the eight-year review of graduate degree programs,
TABLE OF CONTENTS Licensure and Accreditation of Institutions and Programs of Higher Learning ARTICLE ONE Policies and Procedures
Board of Governors for Higher Education Sec. 10a-34 page 1 (12-96) TABLE OF CONTENTS Licensure and Accreditation of Institutions and Programs of Higher Learning ARTICLE ONE Policies and Procedures Introduction....
Homeland Security and Defense Education Consortium Association
Homeland Security and Defense Education Consortium Association General Overview for academic programs (associate s, undergraduate and graduate) seeking program accreditation. SPECIAL NOTE HSDECA has designed
Glossary of Accreditation
Academic An individual whose current responsibilities focus primarily on the curricular aspects of an educational institution or program. Depending on the nature of the institution, this definition may
Guidelines for Preparing New Graduate Program Proposals
Guidelines for Preparing New Graduate Program Proposals The New Programs and Program Review Committee of the Graduate Council recommends that the originators of proposals for new graduate programs follow
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education NEW PROGRAM REQUEST FORM FOR TRADITIONAL AND ONLINE PROGRAMS
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education NEW PROGRAM REQUEST FORM FOR TRADITIONAL AND ONLINE PROGRAMS Page 1 of 11 Institution Submitting Proposal Formal Degree (Level I) (e.g. Bachelor of Science,
CPME 120 STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCREDITING COLLEGES OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE
CPME 120 STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCREDITING COLLEGES OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE COUNCIL ON PODIATRIC MEDICAL EDUCATION This document is concerned with ensuring the quality and improvement of colleges
Guidelines and Standards for Documentation of Faculty Credentials
Guidelines and Standards for Documentation of Faculty Credentials Office of Records Management & Faculty Credentials Del Mar College Guidelines and Standards for Documentation of Faculty Credentials The
Template for Academic Standards Committee Review
Template for Academic Committee Review The numbered titles in this document that appear in boldface print represent the standards being evaluated as met, not met, or partially met on the Program Report
100 Graduate Faculty Handbook
100 Graduate Faculty Handbook 101 Introduction Graduate education is an integral component of Armstrong Atlantic State University (herein Armstrong). Armstrong s graduate programs provide graduate education
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE SELF-STUDY REPORT UTILIZING THE 2013 ACEN STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE SELF-STUDY REPORT UTILIZING THE 2013 ACEN STANDARDS AND CRITERIA PURPOSE This guide provides the program with a review of the Standards and Criteria offering explanations
Graduate Programs Manual Shawnee State University
Graduate Programs Manual Shawnee State University INTRODUCTION The following is a guide to graduate programs at Shawnee State University (SSU). SSU retains the right to change its course offerings, academic
BOARD OF GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA NEW DOCTORAL DEGREE PROPOSAL STAFF ANALYSIS
BOARD OF GOVERRS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA NEW DOCTORAL DEGREE PROPOSAL STAFF ANALYSIS Program: Ph.D. in Computer Science CIP Code: 11.0101 Institution: University of Florida Proposed Implementation
Doctor of Philosophy Program Handbook
Higher Education Doctor of Philosophy Program Handbook College of Education Graduate Education and Research Texas Tech University Box 41071 Lubbock, TX 79409-1071 (806) 742-1997 Fax (806) 742-2197 www.educ.ttu.edu
SCHOOL OF NURSING FACULTY EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR RETENTION, PROMOTION, TENURE, AND PERIODIC REVIEW
SCHOOL OF NURSING FACULTY EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR RETENTION, PROMOTION, TENURE, AND PERIODIC REVIEW This document is to be used in conjunction with the UA Board of Regents policies, University
KU School of Education Graduate Student Handbook
KU School of Education Graduate Student Handbook 2011-2012 Graduate Student Responsibility All graduate students are responsible for informing themselves of requirements of the Graduate School as stated
Preparing for an ABET Accreditation Visit: Writing the Self-Study
Preparing for an ABET Accreditation Visit: Writing the Self-Study Ronald E. Barr Mechanical Engineering Department University of Texas at Austin [email protected] Abstract Engineering faculty must
GRADUATE STUDENT INFORMATION MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
GRADUATE STUDENT INFORMATION MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2013/2014 September 2013 (This edition supersedes all previous editions) Table of Contents I PURPOSE AND SCOPE... 3 II THE
National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education. http://www.cshse.org 2013 (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)
Council for Standards in Human Service Education National Standards BACCALAUREATE DEGREE IN HUMAN SERVICES http://www.cshse.org 2013 (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009) I. GENERAL PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS A. Institutional
How To Get A Ph.D. In Sport Management At Trotson University
Addendum 2014-2015 Graduate Catalog DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PH.D.) IN SPORT MANAGEMENT NOTE: All applicants to the inaugural class of August 2015 must meet the program requirements listed in the Addendum
Department of Public Administration (MPA)
Department of Public Administration (MPA) Criterion 1: Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes VISION, MISSION, OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES VISSION Professional degrees need to be market oriented meaning
Patterson School of Accountancy. PH.D. Program Guide. The University of Mississippi
Patterson School of Accountancy PH.D. Program Guide The University of Mississippi Last Revised November 2013 PATTERSON SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTANCY THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI University, Mississippi 38677
SCHOOL OF URBAN AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE
SCHOOL OF URBAN AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE The School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy is an interdisciplinary graduate and professional school, designated
Accreditation Standards and Rules and Regulations for Mississippi Nursing Degree Programs
Accreditation Standards and Rules and Regulations for Mississippi Nursing Degree Programs Revised July 1, 1992 Revised July 1, 1993 Amended April 1995 Amended June 1998 Amended July 1999 Revised November
McNeese State University. Academic Program Review. Standards for Graduate and Undergraduate Programs
McNeese State University Academic Program Review Standards for Graduate and Undergraduate Programs Rev. and updated 2012 Approved Academic Advisory Council, Dec 17, 2012 1 Contents Overview... 3 Candidates
PROGRAM HANDBOOK Doctor of Education Higher Education Community College Administration
PROGRAM HANDBOOK Doctor of Education Higher Education Community College Administration College of Education Graduate Education and Research Texas Tech University Box 41071 Lubbock, TX 79409-1071 (806)
Guidelines for Conducting an APR Self-Study
Academic Program Reviews Guidelines for Conducting a Self-Study [Revised January 2014; available at http://academicplanning.gwu.edu/academic-program-reviews] The self-study is the vital initial element
MPH Program Policies and Procedures Manual
MPH Program Policies and Procedures Manual Curriculum and Advising Academic Advising Academic advisors are appointed by the chairs, in consultation with the MPH Director Curriculum Decisions All changes
PROCEDURES Doctoral Academic Program Review California State University, Stanislaus
PROCEDURES Doctoral Academic Program Review California State University, Stanislaus Self Study Elements for Academic Program Review for Doctoral Programs Program Improvement from Last Academic Program
Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs
Standards and Guidelines for the Accreditation of Educational Programs in Surgical Technology Essentials/Standards initially adopted in l972; revised in 1991, 2000, 2002, and 2004 by the: American College
Previous Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3, 2011, May 7, 2013
RYERSON UNIVERSITY POLICY OF SENATE PERIODIC PROGRAM REVIEW OF GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS Policy Number 126 Previous Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3,
Regulations for Licensure and Accreditation of Institutions and Programs of Higher Learning
Note: These regulations are in effect while being revised to comply with Public Act 13-118. All references to the Board of Governors for Higher Education, Department of Higher Education and Commissioner
GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE PROVOST UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15260 JULY, 2002 Guidelines for Conducting Evaluations of Academic Programs
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS GRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK. April 2015
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS GRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK April 2015 Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-3113 Voice: 509-335-8645
RACKHAM GRADUATE SCHOOL, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN. Guidelines for Developing and Revising Graduate Degree and Certificate Programs
RACKHAM GRADUATE SCHOOL, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Guidelines for Developing and Revising Graduate Degree and Certificate Programs 2015 Contents Introduction 3 Stages of Proposal Development and Activation
1. Development of a Plan of Study approved by the appropriate faculty or program adviser;
Oakland University Graduate Council PhD Minimum Program Requirements The Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree is awarded by Oakland University on the basis of evidence that the candidate has achieved a
Graduate Policies and Procedures for New Programs. Table of Contents
Graduate Policies and Procedures for New Programs Table of Contents Page I. Overview...2 II. Five-Year Master Plan...2 III. New degree proposals: white papers...2 IV. Consultation among units...4 Prior
Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education (ACOTE ) Guide to Compliance with the 2006 Master s-level OT Standards
Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education (ACOTE ) Guide to Compliance with the 2006 Master s-level OT Standards PREAMBLE: The rapidly changing and dynamic nature of contemporary health
students to complete their degree online. During the preliminary stage of included Art, Business, Computer Science, English, Government, History, and
Texas Woman s University College of Arts and Sciences Bachelor of General Studies Program Undergraduate Program Review May 2012 I. PROGRAM REVIEW AND MISSION A. History Texas Woman s University has a proud
NLNAC STANDARDS AND CRITERIA BACCALAUREATE DEGREE PROGRAMS
NLNAC STANDARDS AND CRITERIA BACCALAUREATE DEGREE PROGRAMS I. Mission and Governance There are clear and publicly stated mission and/or philosophy and purposes appropriate to postsecondary or higher education
PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY AND DEPARTMENTS The Graduate School of NMSU 575 646-5745 Revised on March 19, 2013
PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY AND DEPARTMENTS The Graduate School of NMSU 575 646-5745 Revised on March 19, 2013 Guidelines are provided on developing proposals for the following: Guidelines on
The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering offers three masters options:
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY SUPPLEMENTARY RULES FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING OR COMPUTER ENGINEERING (In addition to the rules of the Graduate College) This document together with the Graduate
Family and Consumer Sciences Education (FCSE) Doctor of Philosophy
Family and Consumer Sciences Education (FCSE) Doctor of Philosophy The Ph.D. degree program is designed to prepare individuals for faculty positions in higher education and other professional leadership
BOARD OF GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA NEW DOCTORAL DEGREE PROPOSAL STAFF ANALYSIS
BOARD OF GOVERRS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA NEW DOCTORAL DEGREE PROPOSAL STAFF ANALYSIS Program: Doctor of Social Work CIP Code: 51.1503 Institution: Florida Atlantic University Proposed Implementation
Appendix A Components for the Review of Institutions of Higher Education
Appendix A Components for the Review of Institutions of Higher Education Appendix A: Components for the Review of Institutions of Higher Education The PI 34 requirements for program approval are organized
GRADUATE DEGREE REGULATIONS
Graduate Regulations-Spring 2014 1 GRADUATE DEGREE REGULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GRADUATE DEGREE REGULATIONS 1 I. GENERAL INFORMATION 2 A. Graduate Advisor/Supervisory Committee.
Laney Graduate School Curricular Revision Guidelines. Updated September 2012
Laney Graduate School Curricular Revision Guidelines Updated September 2012 Contents 1. Courses... 3 1.1. Credit Hour Determination... 3 1.2. Revisions to Existing Courses... 3 1.3. New Course Proposals...
Requirements for a Graduate Degree (M.S. or Ph.D.) in Oceanography at the University of Maine
Requirements for a Graduate Degree (M.S. or Ph.D.) in Oceanography at the University of Maine Mission Statement The University of Maine's Oceanography Program creates and communicates integrated understanding
SELF-STUDY REPORT DIVIDERS
SELF-STUDY REPORT DIVIDERS Outlined below are the supporting documents that are required to be submitted with the Self- Study Report. These additional details are designed to provide the Program Director
III. Standards for Accreditation of Graduate Education Programs in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology
III. Standards for Accreditation of Graduate Education Programs in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Effective January 1, 2008 Introduction The Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and
Graduate Program Policies and Procedures
The University of British Columbia Department of Physics & Astronomy Graduate Program Policies and Procedures May 2007 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Programs 4 3 Admissions 4 3.1 Eligibility 4 3.2
STANDARDS AND REQUIRED ELEMENTS FOR ACCREDITATION OF PHYSICAL THERAPIST EDUCATION PROGRAMS (Revised 11/11/15)
Standard 1 The program meets graduate achievement measures and program outcomes related to its mission and goals. REQUIRED ELEMENTS: 1A The mission 1 of the program is written and compatible with the mission
