FY2012 Budget: Implications for CoC Program Competition

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "FY2012 Budget: Implications for CoC Program Competition"

Cameron Moris Robertson
8 years ago
Views:

1 FY2012 Budget: Implications for CoC Program Competition Mark Johnston, Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development Ann Oliva, Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs 1

2 Presentation Overview FY2012 Budget and the National ARD Budget Implications for the FY2012 CoC Program Competition Understanding the Tiers Understanding Ranking HUD s Selection Priorities 2

3 FY2012 Budget and the National Annual Renewal Demand $1.61 billion plus any available recaptured funds is the amount available for FY2012 CoC Program Competition $1.67 billion is the amount needed to fund all renewals based on the Grant Inventory Worksheets (GIWs) for all CoCs approved during the FY2012 CoC Registration process this is the national Annual Renewal Demand (ARD) amount 3

4 Budget Implications for the FY2012 CoC Program Competition The FY2012 appropriation impacted funding available for CoC Program priorities in the FY2012 NOFA and Competition CoC Planning grants are available to CoCs at 1.25% of FPRN HUD will only provide up to 7% in additional funds for project administrative costs CoCs will have to rank all project applications in two Tiers, which are financial thresholds 4

5 The Tiers A national ARD of $1.67 means that HUD may not have enough funding to award all renewal projects across the country HUD has established Financial Thresholds within which CoCs must place projects Tier 1 = The CoC s ARD, less 3.5% Tier 2 = The CoC s FPRN, plus approved amounts for CoC planning and PH Bonus 5

6 The Tiers Tier 1 Tier 1 should include projects that the CoC determines to be: High Priority High Performing Meeting the Needs and Gaps of the CoC Projects Submitted in Tier 1 can be: Renewal CoC Planning New, including reallocated new 6

7 The Tiers Tier 2 Tier 2 includes projects that the CoC determines to be: Meeting the Needs and Gaps of the CoC Lower Performing Lower Priority Projects Submitted in Tier 2 can be: Renewal CoC Planning New, including reallocated new 7

8 Ranking CoCs must rank all projects that it does not reject, including renewals Projects are ranked from 1 to the total number of projects being submitted for funding within the CoC (e.g., 1 through 50) No rank can be repeated (i.e., there cannot be two projects ranked 1) 8

9 Ranking within the Tiers Tier 1 Ranking begins with 1 Ranking continues through the number of projects it takes to meet this financial threshold Tier 2 Ranking begins with the number after the last number in Tier 1 Ranking continues through the number of projects it takes to meet this financial threshold 9

10 Community Example Balance of State CoC CoC s Approved ARD = $300,000 CoC s Approved PPRN = $350,000 CoC s Approved FPRN = $350,000 CoC s Approved Planning Amount = $10,000 CoC s Approved PH Bonus Amount = $35,000 Amount for Tier 1 Projects = $289,500 Amount for Tier 2 Projects = $395,000 10

11 CoC Rank Community Example Balance of State - Tier 1 Project Name Project Budget Amount CoC Running Budget Total 1 Renewal #1 $ 30, $ 30, Renewal#2 $ 30, $ 60, Renewal#3 $ 50, $ 110, PPRN#1 4 (New PH) $ 20, $ 130, Reallocated#1 $ 50, $ 180,

12 CoC Rank Community Example Balance of State - Tier 1 (cont) Project Name Project Budget Amount CoC Running Budget Total 6 Renewal#6 $ 45, $ 225, Renewal#7 $ 45, $ 270, Planning#1 $ 10, $ 280, NOTE: Tier 1 Limit = $289,500 Project #9 puts CoC over this Amount; therefore, Project #9 must be placed in Tier 2 9 Reallocated #2 $ 30, $ 310,

13 Community Example Balance of State - Tier 2 CoC Rank Project Name Project Budget Amount CoC Running Budget Total 9 Reallocated #2 $ 30, $ 310, PH Bonus#1 $ 35, $ 345, Renewal #4 $ 20, $ 365, PPRN #2 (New HMIS) $ 10, $ 375, PPRN #3 (New PH) $ 20, $ 395,

14 Community Example 14

15 Conditional Selection Priorities Conditional Selection Priorities - Tier 1 Within the rank order established by the CoC, by CoC Score, HUD will select Tier 1 projects in the following order: 1. Renewal projects 6. New PH projects 2. New Reallocated Projects 7. New SSO projects for coordinated assessment 3. CoC Planning Projects 8. New HMIS projects 4. PH Bonus Projects in Extreme High Needs communities 9. New TH projects 5. PH Bonus projects 10. New SSO Projects 15

16 Community Example Balance of State - Tier 1 CoC Rank Project Name HUD Selection Priority 1 Renewal #1 1 2 Renewal#2 2 3 Renewal#3 3 4 PPRN#1 (New PH) 8 5 Reallocated #1 6 6 Renewal#6 4 7 Renewal#7 5 8 Planning#1 7 HUD will Select ALL projects in Tier 1 before selecting any project from Tier 2 16

17 Conditional Selection Priorities Conditional Selection Criteria - Tier 2 Within the rank order established by the CoC, by CoC Score, HUD will select Tier 2 projects in the following order: 1. Renewal projects 6. New PH Projects 2. New Reallocated Projects 7. New HMIS Projects 3. CoC Planning Projects 8. New TH projects 4. PH Bonus Projects in Extreme High Needs communities 5. New SSO Projects for coordinated assessment 9. New SSO Projects 17

18 Community Example Balance of State - Tier 2 CoC Rank Project Name HUD Selection Priority 9 Reallocated # PH Bonus# Renewal # PPRN #2 (New HMIS) PPRN #3 (New PH) 12 Any project completely outside of the CoC s maximum award amount will be automatically rejected by HUD 18

19 Resources Up to date information regarding the CoC program, including a copy of the CoC Program interim rule and TA materials can be found at Up to date information regarding the CoC Program Competition, including a copy of the FY2012 CoC Program NOFA and training materials can be found at psissuances 19

20 Resources Submit Questions to HUD s Homeless Resource Exchange Virtual Help Desk at: Please note: Due to the high volume of questions, please read the regulations and the training materials provided prior to submitting your question to the Virtual Help Desk 20

SOUTHERN NEVADA COC APPLICATION PROCESS

SOUTHERN NEVADA COC APPLICATION PROCESS HUD Policy Priorities NOFA includes 6 overarching policy priorities Strategic Resource Allocation Ending Chronic Homelessness Ending Family Homelessness Ending Youth