Status quo des 'Memorandum of Understanding' zwischen APMG und IPMA. Mag. Brigitte Schaden, IPMA Chairman pma Vorstandsvorsitzende

Transcription

1 Status quo des 'Memorandum of Understanding' zwischen APMG und IPMA Mag. Brigitte Schaden, IPMA Chairman pma Vorstandsvorsitzende Köln, 26. April 2012

2 IPMA Komplexität in Projekten - Zertifizierungslevel Vergleichbarkeit von Standards Memorandum of Understanding APMG-IPMA Ergebnisse und aktueller Status Mapping von assessment Methoden

3 Information: IPMA

4 ExBo 2011/2012

5 IPMA Growth (members)

6 IPMA s World Africa Egypt Marocco South Africa Zambia

7 IPMA s World Asia Azerbaijan China India Iran Kazakhstan Nepal Taiwan

8 IPMA s World Australia

9 IPMA s World Europe Austria Bosnia Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Finland France (AFITEP) France (SMAP) Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Europe Italy Kosovo Latvia Lithuania Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom Ukraine

10 IPMA s World North America Canada Mexico United States

11 IPMA s World South America Brazil Chile Costa Rica Guatemala Panama Peru

12

13 IPMA 4 Level Certification

14 Warum brauchen wir Standards?

15

16 ISO_PC 236 Group photo at Paris plenary at AFNOR office January (photo courtesy Jouko Vaskimo (JV7N0178))

17 The ICB 3

18 The eye of competence Project management success Interested parties 2.01 Leadership 3.01 Project orientation 2.02 Engagement & motivation 3.02 Programme orientation 1.03 Project requirements & objectives 2.03 Self-control 3.03 Portfolio orientation 1.04 Risk & opportunity 2.04 Assertiveness 3.04 Project, programme & portfolio implementation 1.05 Quality 2.05 Relaxation 3.05 Permanent organisation 1.06 Project organisation 2.06 Openness 3.06 Business 1.07 Teamwork 2.07 Creativity 3.07 Systems, products & technology 1.08 Problem resolution 2.08 Results orientation 3.08 Personnel management 1.09 Project structures 2.09 Efficiency Scope & deliverables 2.10 Consultation 3.10 Finance 1.11 Time & project phases 2.11 Negotiation 3.11 Legal 1.12 Resources 2.12 Conflict & crisis 1.13 Cost & finance 2.13 Reliability 1.14 Procurement & contract 2.14 Values appreciation 1.15 Changes 2.15 Ethics 1.16 Control & reports 1.17 Information & documentation 1.18 Communication 1.19 Start-up 1.20 Close-out Health, security, safety & environment

19 The purpose of the GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR PROJECT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS initiative is to develop agreed frameworks as a basis for review, development, and recognition of local standards that will facilitate mutual recognition and transferability of project management qualifications.

20 Mappings to Other Standards As part of our work in the GAPPS to promote transportability & mutual recognition, we mapped various global standards to the GAPPS standards. Based on the GAPPS standard this mapping exercise is done to show which core and common set of topics the various standards have.

21 Diversity of Standards for Project Management De facto Standards ICB 3.0 PMBOK PRINCE 2 PM-Kanon P2M PM3 De jure Standards DIN / ISO IEC ISO special Standards V-Modell XT HOAI VOB/FIDIC IPMA-Delta SPICE OPM 3 Scrum Maturity-Models project excellence CMMI VDA 4.3

22 Up until now the following standards have been mapped to the GAPPS standards: AIPM ANC SPM ICB3 P2M PMBOK 2008 PRINCE SAQA NQF Level 5

23 Memorandum of Understanding 11 th November 2009, Vienna The International Project Management Association (IPMA) and The APM Group are pleased to announce they have signed a Memorandum of Understanding which will enable the two organizations to support and recognise each other. Brigitte Schaden, President of IPMA Alan Harpham, Chairman, The APM Group

24

25

26 MoU OBJECTIVES To publicise the mapping between ICB.3 and PRINCE2 as developed by GAPPS and verified by IPMA and APM Group. To encourage IPMA members and PRINCE2 qualified people to research and write articles comparing and contrasting the ICB.3 and PRINCE2. To recognize that PRINCE2 provides knowledge and understanding of a number of the concepts included in the ICB.3 and in due course IPMA will develop supplementary exams to enable PRINCE2 Practitioners to achieve appropriate IPMA qualifications i.e. at levels C & D. To raise awareness of the IPMA member association's individual membership schemes among the APM Group's examination candidates. To bring the IPMA member associations corporate membership schemes to the attention of the APM Group's Accredited Organizations.

27 ICB3 - PRINCE 2

28 PRINCE2-IPMA Syllabus Upgradezertifizierung von PRINCE2 Practitioner zu IPMA Level D Syllabus

29 PILOT Project (Poland) Pilot Project in Poland regarding Bridging Qualification from PRINCE2 Practitioner to IPMA Level D certification Start: London, Sept 5th 2011 The groups for the pilot will be organized by the APMG Accredited Training Organizations Training before the session should cover all competence elements taken under consideration in Level D assessment. Pilot exams to be held in English only, Polish version planned for post-pilot 4 ATOs are participating in the pilot. 3-4 exam sessions of pilot exams to be organized in 2012

30 Suggested format of the upgrade certificate 2 written parts: A multiple choice test and an objective test exam 1. Multiple choice 9 competence elements from technical competence elements 26 competence elements from contextual and behavioural competence elements Duration: 30 minutes 2. Scenario type questions OTEs - Understanding and application level Duration : 1 hour

31 Mapping of Global Certifications and Qualifications GAPPS has pubished a mapping of the different assessment methods used for the various certifications and qualifications for project management that are issued by professional association and governments endorsed institutes such as universities and vocational education providers.

32 Never give up