Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning

Transcription

1 Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning

2 The GeoJournal Library Volume 106 Managing Editor: Daniel Z. Sui, College Station, USA Founding Series Editor: Wolf Tietze, Helmstedt, Germany Editorial Board: Paul Claval, France Yehuda Gradus, Israel Sam Ock Park, South Korea Herman van der Wusten, The Netherlands For further volumes:

3 Ayda Eraydin Tuna Taşan-Kok Editors Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning

4 Editors Ayda Eraydin Department of City and Regional Planning Middle East Technical University (METU) Ankara, Turkey Tuna Taşan-Kok OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment Delft University of Technology Delft, The Netherlands ISSN ISBN ISBN (ebook) DOI / Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, speci fi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on micro fi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied speci fi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci fi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (

5 Preface and Acknowledgements This book was born out of the frustrations of a group of urban planners and researchers who have increasingly felt the inadequacy of the planning systems and policies introduced to prepare cities for the future in an increasingly neoliberalising world. As this shortfall was becoming more evident among urban policymakers, planners and researchers in different parts of the world, a group of discontent researchers sought new approaches to cope with the increasing vulnerabilities of urban systems in the wake of growing socio-economic and ecological problems, privatisation of infrastructure services, fear and distrust in society and a loss of ecological services on the one hand; and decreases in welfare services and quality of urban environments, which have been shed by the appealing business and commercial centres, of fi ce spaces and the luxurious residential areas on the other. Our main intention in this book was fi rst to identify how far existing planning systems and practices are able to support the sustained development of urban areas and prepare them to withstand both foreseen and unforeseen changes; while a secondary aim was to discuss the alternative perspectives, systems and principles of a new planning approach. Our combined enthusiasm brought us together in a research project supported by the URBAN- NET funding scheme under the Eranet Programme of the EU. This book is a result of a research project entitled Sustainable Land Use Policies for Resilient Cities, which took 2 years to complete, with additional work after the completion of the project reports. The project aimed to discuss and de fine sustainable land-use policies for the creation of resilient cities, which has become increasingly important in recent years since urban systems must accommodate different global in fl uences in diverse forms and be ready to address potential uncertainties and unexpected changes. The research framework embraced the importance of resilience thinking in urban polices in the contexts of urban decline, socio-economic vulnerability, urban landscape degradation and institutional fragmentation. The team was composed of four research groups from four countries, namely Portugal, Sweden, the Netherlands and Turkey, whose combined focus on the resilience concept was applied to urban planning and methods to assess resilience, especially by resorting to the de fi nition of comparable attributes and indicators in different cities, being Istanbul, Oporto, Lisbon, Rotterdam and Stockholm. v

6 vi Preface and Acknowledgements The composition of the group of researchers, who were able to offer different perspectives and experiences from the four distinct countries of Europe, as well as a broad and in-depth knowledge of the case study cities, made the studies a real learning process for all the contributors to the project. From the very beginning this book was planned to be more than just a collection of papers, with the intention being to bring together chapters that followed a complementary approach. To achieve this, the research method to be followed by the individual researchers from different countries and cities was clearly de fi ned, which made a comparison of the outcomes of the different studies easier. Meetings and fi eld trips were organised in each of the case study cities, with special attention paid to the areas in which the research was to be focused. These meetings not only allowed us to understand each other s case better, but also brought us closer together as a team, working together towards a common goal. This book bene fi ted a great deal from the respect and understanding created by this friendship. We, as the editors of the book, wish to emphasise the importance of this positive atmosphere on the quality of work. Thanks to this real team feeling, discussions were fruitful, attempts to understand and re fl ect the different perspectives were effective, and the completed work was detailed. We regret that we were not able to fully re fl ect the richness of the individual research outcomes within this book due to limitations of space, and would like to thank all of those that contributed to this book for their patience and cooperation when decreasing the several hundreds of pages to chapters of limited size, which was obviously tiring and tedious work. We hope that the outcome will satisfy not only the contributors to the book, but also readers from different disciplines, origins and countries. Were we successful in easing our initial frustration at the end of this research? Not exactly; however we believe that light has been thrown on possible alternative ways and means of overcoming existing and future problems, and we are con fi dent in our belief that an alternative path exists that is based upon resilient thinking. We hope that this new perspective that we have attempted to elaborate will fi nd reverberations in the fi elds of urban planning and urban research. We would like to thank not only the colleagues that contributed to this book, but also our research assistants Deniz Altay Kaya, Melih Gürçay and Çiğdem Özonat from the Department of City and Regional Planning of the Middle East Technical University for their contributions to the preparation of this book; and to Peiwen Lu for supporting the Dutch team. Special thanks go to Dr. Dominic Stead, who initially came up with the idea to make a research proposal and put the team together. We also express our gratitude to the Urban-Net scheme for providing funding and support for our research. Many thanks also to Colin Sutcliffe for the great job he did for editing the language of the manuscript. Last, but not least, we wish to thank Evelien Bakker and Bernadette Deelen of Springer for their continuous support and fl exibility during the process of creating this publication. This book is devoted to young urban planners who will soon discover the potentials of resilience thinking for the future of our cities! October 2012 Ayda Eraydin Tuna Taşan-Kok

7 Contents 1 Introduction: Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning... 1 Ayda Eraydin and Tuna Taşan-Kok 2 Resilience Thinking for Planning Ayda Eraydin 3 Conceptual Overview of Resilience: History and Context Tuna Taşan-Kok, Dominic Stead, and Peiwen Lu 4 Urban Resilience and Spatial Dynamics Sara Santos Cruz, João Pedro T.A. Costa, Silvia Ávila de Sousa, and Paulo Pinho 5 Analysing the Socio-Spatial Vulnerability to Drivers of Globalisation in Lisbon, Oporto, Istanbul, Stockholm and Rotterdam Tuna Taşan-Kok and Dominic Stead 6 Systems, Cultures and Styles: Spatial Planning in Portugal, Turkey, Sweden and the Netherlands Sofia Morgado and Luís F. Dias 7 Managing Urban Change in Five European Urban Agglomerations: Key Policy Documents and Institutional Frameworks Peter Schmitt 8 Evaluating Resilience in Planning Paulo Pinho, Vítor Oliveira, and Ana Martins 9 Assessing Urban Resilience in the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon: The Case of Alcântara Luís F. Dias, Sofia Morgado, and João Pedro T.A. Costa vii

8 viii Contents 10 Evaluating Urban Policies from a Resilience Perspective: The Case of Oporto Vítor Oliveira, Ana Martins, and Sara Santos Cruz 11 The Evaluation of Different Processes of Spatial Development from a Resilience Perspective in Istanbul Ayda Eraydin, Ali Türel, and Deniz Altay Kaya 12 Urban Resilience and Polycentricity: The Case of the Stockholm Urban Agglomeration Peter Schmitt, Lisbeth Greve Harbo, Asli Tepecik Diş, and Anu Henriksson 13 Urban Resilience, Climate Change and Land-Use Planning in Rotterdam Dominic Stead and Tuna Taşan-Kok 14 The Evaluation of Findings and Future of Resilience Thinking in Planning Ayda Eraydin and Tuna Taşan-Kok About the Authors Index

9 Contributors João Pedro T.A. Costa Faculty of Architecture, Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal Sara Santos Cruz Faculty of Engineering, CITTA Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, University of Oporto, Oporto, Portugal Sílvia Ávila de Sousa Faculty of Engineering, CITTA Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, University of Oporto, Oporto, Portugal Luís F. Dias Faculty of Architecture, Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal Asli Tepecik Diş Nordregio, Nordic Centre for Spatial Development, Stockholm, Sweden Ayda Eraydin Department of City and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey Lisbeth Greve Harbo Nordregio, Nordic Centre for Spatial Development, Stockholm, Sweden Anu Henriksson The University of Tampere, School of Management, Tampere, Finland Deniz Altay Kaya Department of City and Regional Planning, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey Peiwen Lu Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands Ana Martins Faculty of Engineering, CITTA Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, University of Oporto, Oporto, Portugal Sofia Morgado Faculty of Architecture, Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal ix

10 x Contributors Vitor Oliveira Faculty of Engineering, CITTA Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, University of Oporto, Oporto, Portugal Paulo Pinho Faculty of Engineering, CITTA Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, University of Oporto, Oporto, Portugal Peter Schmitt Nordregio, Nordic Centre for Spatial Development, Stockholm, Sweden Dominic Stead OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands Tuna Taşan-Kok OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands Ali Türel Department of City and Regional Planning, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

11 List of Figures Fig. 1.1 The framework Fig. 6.1 Styles of planning and national planning systems: Portugal, Turkey, Sweden, and the Netherlands Fig. 9.1 Metropolitan Area of Lisbon and case study location Fig. 9.2 Time travel to Alcântara. Present, solution I and solution II Fig. 9.3 Changes in building areas in Alcântara Fig Critical Area of Urban Recovery and Rehabilitation (ACCRU), Priority Intervention Zone (ZIP) and historical centre World Heritage Site Fig Identi fi cation of critical areas within the Priority Zone of Intervention (ZIP). Critical areas due to building conservation, population density and vacant buildings Fig Map of Oporto: location of the Priority Intervention Areas (AIP), urban blocks with/without strategic documents (DE) Fig Case study areas Fig Zones with different characteristics and transformation potential in the Büyükdere-Maslak axis Fig Bahçeşehir Housing Estate and its surroundings Fig A rough sketch of Stockholm s urban fabric 1945, 1975 and Fig The intended polycentric territorial layout in Stockholm County: one central and eight regional urban cores xi

12

13 List of Tables Table 2.1 The resilience planning paradigm and its major characteristics in comparison to rational and communicative planning paradigms Table 5.1 Impact of economic restructuring in different periods in the case study areas Table 5.2 Dominant urban growth dynamics in four countries in different periods Table 5.3 Current urban growth dynamics in the case study cities Table 6.1 Planning systems review applied to the four national planning systems (most representative styles according to this study) Table 7.1 Major strategic concerns, instruments and approaches in the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon Table 7.2 Major strategic concerns, instruments and approaches in the urban agglomeration of Oporto Table 7.3 Major strategic concerns, instruments and approaches in the urban agglomeration of Istanbul Table 7.4 Major strategic concerns, instruments and approaches in the urban agglomeration of Stockholm Table 7.5 Major strategic concerns, instruments and approaches in the urban agglomeration of Rotterdam Table 9.1 Indicators used to evaluate the connectivity attribute in the social dimension and under centrality/polycentricity policy/measures Table 9.2 Possible outcomes of increasing connectivity under centrality/polycentricity policy/measure Table 9.3 Indicators used to evaluate adaptability attribute in the environmental dimension and under rehousing policy/measure xiii

14 xiv List of Tables Table 9.4 Indicators used to evaluate adaptability attribute in the economic dimension and under urban reconversion policy/measure Table 9.5 Indicators used to evaluate adaptability attribute in the social dimension and under urban reconversion policy/measure Table 10.1 Attribute recovery and indicators for the formulation and implementation phase Table 10.2 Coverage degree of the programmes, policies, plans or/and projects Table 10.3 Annual average numbers of rehabilitated buildings Table 10.4 Rehabilitation rate of progress Table 10.5 Attribute social capital building and indicators for the formulation and implementation phase Table 11.1 The land-use pattern and transformation areas in the Büyükdere-Maslak axis case study area Table 11.2 The impact of external dynamics on urban systems and the indicators used to verify them Table 11.3 The land-use patterns in Bahçeşehir and its surroundings Table 11.4 The indicators used to verify the impact of different dynamics on urban systems Table 13.1 Development options for climate change adaptation from Rotterdam Sustainability Guide