COURSE HANDBOOK 2012/13. Certificate of Higher Education in INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS
|
|
|
- Jesse Miles
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 COURSE HANDBOOK 2012/13 Certificate of Higher Education in INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS SEPTEMBER 2012
2 TO ALL STUDENTS Welcome to the Department of Psychological Sciences at Birkbeck College. This booklet contains valuable information about the department and the content of the modules you may take with us, as well as details of assessment arrangements, services offered by the department and the university and many other useful bits and pieces. Keep it close to hand! You may have come to gain a certificate of higher education in order to enhance your career or expand your knowledge. Or you may have a long term goal of completing a degree. Whichever is the case, we hope you will find the experience both rewarding and enjoyable. All our modules are taught by lecturers and trainers who are committed to providing a rich and rewarding environment that will help you to learn and to engage with the diverse subject matter and theories concerned with communication. It can be difficult to juggle the pressures of work and home with the demands of studying at degree level. Our aim is to provide high-quality courses that will help you to fulfil your potential. Nonetheless, we know problems can arise which make this difficult. Birkbeck offers a wide range of support services which you should use to your advantage. Please do speak to your course tutors or to another member of staff if you have any problems which could impact your study. Please remember that as a student, you too have some responsibilities on the course. We ask you to keep up with the course by attending classes, studying outside class and taking part in the assessment process. It is also your responsibility to seek advice and help when you feel you need it. At times you may find your course/s intensive and challenging, but we also hope they will be stimulating and - most importantly - that you enjoy your time in the Department of Psychological Sciences. Jonathan Smith, Award Co-Ordinator Interpersonal Communication Skills Programme 2
3 CONTENTS PROGRAMME OF STUDY GENERAL INFORMATION TEACHING AND LEARNING ASSESSMENT COMPLETION OF AWARD FEEDBACK STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES LEARNING RESOURCES FURTHER STUDY DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES APPENDIX 1: MARKING CRITERIA (ESSAYS) APPENDIX 2: MARKING CRITERIA (PRESENTATIONS)
4 1. PROGRAMME OF STUDY Who is the Certificate for? This award is designed to give a consolidated and structured approach to the theory and application of interpersonal communication. The knowledge, skills and understanding gained from the programme will be relevant to students in terms of their work life, home life and social situations. The award will be of interest to: managers who have never formally developed their communication skills or who may want their existing skills accredited other professionals who may be qualified or experienced in their particular field and for whom communication is an important tool people working in the voluntary sector, the charitable sector, the caring professions where careful communication is an intrinsic requirement of the work those who are changing career, returning to work, embarking on personal development those who simply want to be more effective in the way in which they communicate with others in their work, domestic or social life Do I need any previous qualifications? There are no formal admission requirements and the award is open to anyone who feels they may benefit. However, the course is demanding in terms of reading, writing and oral communication and students should be prepared to participate in the practical work. Modules are taught and assessed at first year undergraduate level and an appropriate level of spoken and written English is required. Although we do not require proof that you are operating at this level, we will not be able to compensate for inadequate English skills when marking assessments. What modules are available? The Certificate of Higher Education in Interpersonal Communication Skills is made up of four core modules. Each module is worth 30 Credits at Level 4 and delivered over one term and is comprised of 42 hours course contact time. The modules are: Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 Communication Skills: Theory and Practice Communication Skills: Self and Others Applied Communication: Health and Well-Being Applied Communication: Business and Organisations 4
5 It is recommended, but not compulsory, that you complete modules 1 and 2 before commencing modules 3 and 4. In addition to assignments for the purpose of assessment, students will be encouraged to undertake work between sessions but wherever possible this will be related to naturally occurring practical opportunities. Credits Credits for this award are as follows: 30 credits at Level 4 for each module 120 credits at Level 4 for the Certificate of Higher Education Level 4 is equivalent to first-year undergraduate study. How long does it take to complete? Students are normally expected to complete the Certificate of Higher Education in two years. However, you may take up to four years to complete your award. 5
6 2. GENERAL INFORMATION How will the department contact me? The department will normally contact students by , using the address that the College holds for you. It is therefore important that you provide an address that you are able to check regularly, and that you inform the department of any changes to your contact details. What if my class is cancelled? If for any reason one of your classes is cancelled, you will be informed by unless the cancellation occurs at short notice. If a class is cancelled on the same day that it is due to take place, we will endeavour to contact students by telephone, where possible. Again, we can only use the information that we hold for you on our system, so please do ensure that you provide us with a mobile telephone number wherever possible. 6
7 3. TEACHING AND LEARNING What type of teaching is used? The organisation of the course content offers an integrated approach to the theoretical material, the development of core skills, and the application of skills in organisational and occupational settings. This will help students to develop their interpersonal communication skills in a consolidated way, taking their individual learning styles, learning needs and specialist interest areas into account. The implications of culture, of individual needs and of the needs of society in relation to communication skills will be an integral part of the syllabus. MODULE 1: Communication Skills: Theory and Practice You will focus on communication models and processes and on developing core skills, including: models and styles of communication; language and non-verbal channels; the cultural context; diversity power, gender and race issues, cross cultural communication; perception and person perception, impression formation and attribution theory; core skill development listening, questioning, paraphrasing and feedback, writing and presentation skills. MODULE 2: Communication Skills: Self and Others You will develop the basic principles learnt in Module 1 by focusing on: the role of the self: self-image, self-presentation, self-disclosure and self-esteem; relationships attraction and liking, relationship formation and development; group processes and group dynamics; skills, including self-management, assertiveness, nonviolent communication and negotiation. MODULE 3: Applied Communication: Health and Well-Being Focuses on applications of communication that relate to health & well being, and the role of communication in contributing to life satisfaction and happiness; including a range of basic models of counselling and therapy, including psychodynamic and humanistic approaches, Transactional Analysis and Gestalt; emotional intelligence, thinking skills, mental health, conflict resolution and neuro-linguistic programming. MODULE 4: Applied Communication: Business and Organisations This module develops key communication applications relating to today s workplace and organisational contexts; topics of study include organisational culture; managing meetings and interviews effectively; coaching and developing people, high performing teams; mediation, the art of persuasive and influential communication, leadership and advanced presentation skills. Applications to other social groups will also be explored. What are the attendance requirements? 7
8 It is strongly recommended that students attend all classes because of the cumulative and interactive nature of the sessions. How much work is involved? A module worth 15 credits normally equates to a total of up to 150 hours of study. This includes time in class, time studying at home, time preparing assignments, time spent processing ideas and thinking about assignments in fact any time you spend engaged in learning related to that module. The time students will need to set aside each week will vary between students depending on how much time they need to achieve the learning outcomes. Most expect to allow from 6-12 hrs per week outside the classroom. Although this is only offered as a guide, it highlights the amount of time you should expect to plan for, given that this is an undergraduate level award and that learning will involve time within and outside of the classroom. What academic and study skills support is available? All students are encouraged to discuss their study skills needs with the course lecturer. Whilst study skills are incorporated into most courses, students who need or want more support than the course lecturer can realistically provide, may want to consider enrolling on one of the following study skills courses run by the Psychology team: Study Skills for Psychology Students Essay Writing for Psychology Students For further details, and to enrol, please visit our website: or contact the Administrator for Psychology. However, learning and study skills support is also provided centrally by the College - please see Section 7 - Student Support Services for more information. 8
9 4. ASSESSMENT For each module coursework must be submitted to the lecturer for formal assessment. All coursework submitted to the lecturer for formal assessment during the programme of study will be submitted for final assessment by internal assessors and external moderators. Coursework will carry 100% of the possible marks for each module. Formal assessment amounts to words per module or the equivalent and consists of a range of essays, reports, reviews, or other projects as may be set by the lecturers. Presentations where used will count towards the total word length. Each module will be assessed by units of assessment which may be made up of single assignments of words, double assignments of words and presentations (15 minutes equivalent to 3000 words) as follows: Module 1: Two pieces of work comprised of a double and a single assignment Module 2: Three pieces of work comprised of a double and two single assignments. Module 3: assignment Two pieces of works comprised of a presentation and a double Module 4: assignment Two pieces of works comprised of a presentation and a double Word length All work submitted for assessment must adhere to the specified word limits. Work that is significantly longer or shorter than this (more than 50 words either way) will be subject to a penalty. This penalty should be applied as follows: Work which is up to 10% too short or too long will have 5 marks deducted (ie between or for single units, or double units) Work that is more than 10% too short or too long will have 10 marks deducted. (ie less than 900 words or more than 1650 words for single units and less than 1800 words and more than 3300 words for double units). MODULE RESULTS 9
10 The final mark for Modules will be arrived at as follows: Module 1: The weighting for this module is 66.6% and 33.3%. The mark for the double essay is doubled to provide an average of three marks. Module 2: The weighting for this module is 50%, 25% and 25%. The mark for the double essay is doubled to provide an average of four marks. Module 3: The presentation and the written assignment have equal weighting and the final mark for the module will be arrived at by averaging the two marks. Students must pass the presentation in order to pass the module. Module 4: The presentation and the written assignment have equal weighting and the final mark for the module will be arrived at by averaging the two marks. Students must pass the presentation in order to pass the module. For modules 1 and 2 given that the final mark is a weighted average of the marks awarded, students may still pass the Module even if they have failed a piece of coursework. For Modules 3 and 4 students must pass the presentation to pass the module. FEEDBACK Aside from marking your work, your tutor will also give you feedback that will both explain the mark awarded and offer you advice on how to develop and improve your work next time. If you are not clear about the feedback please ask your lecturer to explain it and they will be happy to do so. MARKING CRITERIA Your work will be marked according to the published criteria for Interpersonal Communication Skills Certificate of Higher Education courses (please see Appendix 1). COURSEWORK SUBMISSION DEADLINES The regulations governing assessment conform to the Common Award Scheme, details of which are available on the College website: Key points to note are: How you submit your coursework; the range of difficulties that are acceptable as mitigating circumstances; and the number of attempts that you can have at any one module; 10
11 Submission of Coursework Under the Common Award Scheme there are strict timetables for submitting coursework at the end of the module. There are two key dates, for the Communication Skills programme: The first key submission date will be the last date of your course. Work submitted by this date will be accepted without penalty. That work submitted after the first submission date for your class (i.e. after the last session) will be capped at the 40% pass mark unless mitigating circumstances apply (please see overleaf). The second submission date will be as follows: o Modules 1 and 3: Monday 18 February 2013 o Modules 2 and 4: Monday 1 July 2013 Work submitted after the second published deadline will not be accepted and will be returned. Students should note the importance of these deadlines and the implications of missing either one or both of them. Please note: That posting of work does not constitute submission. It is your responsibility to ensure work has been received and to keep proof of postage and copies of your work. Work submitted after the first deadline should be submitted to your tutor as an electronic attachment by . You should ensure that you request and have confirmation of receipt from your tutor as proof. That it is your responsibility to be clear about the internal submission dates for your course including dates the presentations are scheduled so that you can ensure that you make necessary arrangements to meet the deadlines and attend the presentations. MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES If you feel that you have mitigating circumstances that affected your work and that you would like considered by the Sub-Board of Examiners, you should complete the appropriate form which can be downloaded from our website: umstances.doc and submit it as soon as possible and before the second submission deadline. 11
12 Please note: Not all mitigating circumstances may be considered valid. For a representative list of the kinds of mitigating circumstances that will be considered and those that won t, please visit our website: All valid mitigating circumstances will need to be supported with appropriate documentary evidence. If you are unable to submit one or more pieces of your coursework (or unable to attend a presentation) due to mitigating circumstances you may apply for a deferral of the outstanding elements of your assessment. The completed mitigating circumstances form and documentary evidence should be submitted before the second submission deadline. You should note that mitigating circumstances will only be considered where there is clear evidence that the circumstances occurred in the short period leading to or at the time of the assessment. Please note that marks awarded are normally never changed. In exceptional circumstances marks may be raised by up to 2% to secure a pass where a student has marginally failed a piece of work if there is evidence that their performance was adversely affected by the mitigating circumstances where normally their performance is of a higher standard. Where a Sub-Board of Examiners judges that a student s performance was affected by mitigating circumstances the student will be offered the option of repeating that element of the assessment. This reassessment if taken up does not count as an attempt. The dates for reassessment are as outlined below. If you are unable to meet the first deadline and the second deadlines due to mitigating circumstances relating to those periods you will have until 1 July 2013 to submit your mitigating circumstances form to apply for a deferral. FAILURE AND RE-ASSESSMENT OF A MODULE To satisfactorily complete a module, students must achieve an overall mark of 40% or more. If you fail to pass a module at your first attempt then you may be reassessed or you may be required to re-take. Re-assessment and re-takes Re-assessment is where a student will re-attempt a failed element of a failed module without attending any further classes. 12
13 A re-take requires a student to re-enrol for the module, re-attend the course and re-take the full coursework requirements. A decision on whether you will be permitted to be re-assessed in one or more elements of a module that has not been passed is at the discretion of the sub-board of examiners. As a general guide, it is expected that students who fail a module with an overall mark of between 30-39% are likely to be offered re-assessment. Those with an overall mark of 29% or less are likely to be required to re-take the module. The reassessment submission deadline for all modules will be Monday 2 September 2013 for all modules If you do not wish to take up the offer of re-assessment you must let us know in writing by responding to the offer by the specified deadline. Failure to do so will mean that you have to re-take the module. Number of attempts Students are permitted three attempts at passing a module (the original attempt plus two further attempts, of which only one may be a reassessment). An attempt constitutes: A student who completes and submits all the coursework even if they fail the module overall (such cases will be resulted with the actual mark obtained). A student who fails a module with an overall mark of 30-39% and takes up the opportunity given by the Sub-Board of Examiners to be reassessed in the failed element(s) of a module. (Students may only be reassessed once. If they subsequently fail they must retake the module) A student who chooses not to submit all pieces of coursework required but has not formally withdrawn the item(s) in question will be awarded a zero to arrive at the overall mark. Implications for completion of a module are: A student who does not complete the coursework requirements for a folder and has not formally withdrawn from assessment in writing before the first submission date will be deemed to have attempted the module. Unless mitigating circumstances are submitted and a deferral requested for the 13
14 outstanding item(s) the student will be resulted by averaging the marks based on a mark of zero for the non-submitted items. Students cannot retake a module to gain a higher mark. A student failing to complete a module satisfactorily after three attempts will not be permitted to re-enrol for the module. Where the module is a core module such a student will be unable to meet the requirements for that award. Students must complete Modules 1 and 2 before progressing to modules 3 and 4. REFERENCING AND PLAGIARISM It is an essential academic requirement that coursework is properly referenced. Referencing your written work means using an accepted system to clearly identify the source of your information. Referencing consists of both making an attribution to other authors within the body of your work and then including an organised list of those references at the end. What is plagiarism? Using other people s words or ideas in your work without properly referencing this is called plagiarism and is a very serious issue in Higher Education. According to College policy, plagiarism can take a variety of forms and can be categorised as follows: copying a whole or substantial parts of a paper from a source text (e.g. a web site, journal article, book or encyclopaedia), without proper acknowledgement; paraphrasing someone else s work closely, with minor changes but with the essential meaning, form and/or progression of ideas maintained; piecing together sections of the work of others into a new whole; procuring a paper from a company or essay bank (including Internet sites); submitting another student s work, with or without that student s knowledge submitting a paper written by someone else (e.g. a peer or relative), and passing it off as one s own representing a piece of joint or group work as one s own Both committing plagiarism and helping someone else to are both potentially very serious. 14
15 Academic declaration form When submitting coursework (e.g. essay or other coursework or dissertation), you will need to sign an academic declaration form, stating that you have read the sections of plagiarism in your Handbook and confirming that the work is your own, with the work of others fully acknowledged. Consequences of Plagiarising According to the College Policy on Assessment Offences (2008) there are two types of offences: Minor Offences - inappropriate paraphrasing, a relatively small amount of unattributed quotations, and up to several sentences of direct copying (without acknowledging sources), where these are first offences. Major Offences copying of paragraphs (without acknowledging sources), downloading essays from cheat sites on the Internet, copying much/all of the work of a fellow student, allegations of plagiarism in multiple pieces of coursework submitted by a student and examination, collusion and other offences. You need to be aware that both types of offences could lead to serious penalties. Details of this policy can be found on My Birkbeck at but it is simply much better to avoid plagiarism! Avoiding Plagiarism In essence, the most obvious way to avoid plagiarism is to close books and exit the web etc. before starting to write. This is also the best way to learn as it requires the student to internalise and then verbalise the concepts they are studying. Obviously they can then rework what they have written and add references etc. A similar strategy would be to imagine that their work is a letter to a friend: if they were to explain what they have learnt to a friend or to put their argument on a particular question to a friend - they would inevitably use their own words. Again, when they have finished they can add an appropriate introduction and conclusion, and references. More specific strategies include: always including a reference that shows the source of the material (in the body of the work and in the reference list) always using inverted commas ( ) when using a direct quote from a book, the web etc. 15
16 Keeping direct quotes to a minimum always rewriting what is taken from books etc in their own words always giving the name/s and dates linked to the theories or studies under discussion Referencing your work There are a number of different methods for referencing your work and you should use an appropriate system. As the Harvard system is one which is often used in the Social Sciences, and consequently is one which would be useful for you to become familiar with, it is the system that will be described in this guide. What to reference References are important. They enhance the credibility of your work, ensure that you avoid plagiarism by not claiming another's work as your own and they allow interested readers to use your sources for further information. It might be obvious that you must reference your source when you use the direct words of another author, but it is also important to do so when you put the information into your own words. The general rule is that if the information came from an identifiable source and is not either general knowledge or your own original idea, then you should provide a reference. This may mean that almost every paragraph in your written work may carry one or more references - this is perfectly normal and acceptable. Some sentences may even have more than one reference. In fact you should be wary of paragraphs you write that do not contain a reference. It is always safer to err on the side of caution and include a reference rather than not. Please remember that although fully referencing your work is an important aim in academic writing, it is also a skill that needs to be developed, don t worry if it takes several attempts before you feel confident in its use. How to reference Referencing within the text of your written work involves noting the author, date and sometimes the page number of the information source as shown below: Germov and Williams (1996, p.6) argue that... It also means having a Reference List at the end of your work which itemises in alphabetical order (by author's surname) the full details of the sources of information. For a book 16
17 Include the author s surname and initials, title (italicised or underlined), edition (where relevant), publisher and place. For example: Smith J., and Jones L. (1999) A Psychology of Consumerism: When enough is not enough, Oxford University Press, London. For a journal article Details should include author's surname and initials, article title (in single quotation marks), journal title (italicised or underlined), volume number and issue number (if relevant), and the page numbers of the article. For example: Ashley, J. and Tomasello, M. (1988) Cooperative problem-solving and teaching in preschoolers, Social Development, 7 (2), For a web page For web pages you should aim to include (where available) the author of the information (a person, group or organisation), date (most web pages have a date at the bottom of the page), title, URL, and the date you accessed the web page. It is important to include the access date as web information is prone to constant change and sometimes to disappear altogether. For example, the reference for a web page would appear in your Reference list as follows: Germov, J. and Williams, L. (1998) Social Appetite Web [web page] date accessed: 1 January If no author information is listed on the web page, you would simply write the reference as follows: Get Great Information Fast, [web page] (1998), date accessed: 1 January Reference list or bibliography - what's the difference? The list of information sources cited at the end of a work can be called either a Reference List or a Bibliography. In most cases the two terms are interchangeable, but some disciplines maintain a distinction between the two terms. To be specific, a Reference list is a list of the actual references cited in the text of your written work, whereas a Bibliography is a wider list of information sources related to the topic, but not specifically quoted in the text. 17
18 For Certificate of Higher Education courses a Reference List is sufficient although you can also add a bibliography detailing any further reading around the subject that informed your understanding but which you have not directly quoted from. How to use the et al. abbreviation When there are more than three authors, and only then, it is acceptable to use the Latin abbreviation et al. (short for et allii meaning 'and others') to save space. You can do this after you have written the names out in full once. Smith et al. (1988) argue that... Please note that when listing Smith in the Reference list you need to include the names of all the authors; et al. can only be used in the text. Further Information Further information on referencing and plagiarism can be obtained from the Birkbeck Library website (including a number of tutorials and more detailed guides) at Your tutor will also be able to provide you with additional advice and guidance. MODERATION All coursework is subject to the moderation procedures of the College to ensure the equity and accuracy of marking of student assessments across all modules. You should be aware that all marks awarded by tutors are provisional until confirmed by the Sub-Board of Examiners and may change during the moderation process. You must submit all of your marked assessments at the end of your module to your tutor. The work should be submitted in a flat folder (either an A4 plastic folder or envelope folder) and should include green coversheets. All coversheets must be appropriately completed and signed to confirm the work is your own. NOTIFICATION OF RESULTS AND RETURN OF COURSEWORK The Sub-Board of Examiners normally meets in the last week of July to ratify results. However, a nominated committee of the Sub-Board of Examiners will meet during the year to consider mitigating circumstances and identify students eligible for reassessment for Modules 1 and 3. 18
19 Online notification of results for all modules will take place in mid August. You will be able to check your results via your My Birkbeck profile (see Student Support Services for more information). Coursework is normally returned to students four-six weeks after the notification of results have been sent. APPEAL PROCEDURE There is no provision for appeals against the academic judgement of Sub-Boards of Examiners in assessing the merits of assessment. The grounds on which appeals may be made are outlined in section 39 of the Common Awards Scheme Regulations for Taught Programmes of Study (see for further details). STUDENT COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE (ACADEMIC ISSUES) The aim of the College s Student Complaints Procedure is to ensure that complaints from students relating to courses of study, the availability or quality of facilities and any issues relating to College staff are dealt with fairly and promptly. Further details of the full procedure can be found at: 19
20 5. COMPLETION OF AWARD Requirements and Award Scheme To complete the award of the Certificate of Higher Education in Interpersonal Communication Skills, you need to successfully complete all four modules worth a total of 120 credit points. Overall marks for the award are calculated as outlined in the College regulations: Students who achieve an overall mark of above 70% will receive a Distinction classification. All other marks between 40% and 70% are classified as a Pass. Award Ceremony and Issuing of Certificate Students who have successfully completed the Certificate of Higher Education will be invited to attend the Certificate and Diploma Holders Ceremony which normally takes place in February. The Certificates themselves are normally issued in April. 20
21 6. FEEDBACK Providing feedback about your course Students are invited to give informal, verbal feedback to the tutor at any point during the course. Such feedback can be incredibly useful in helping the tutor to tailor their methods and the contents of the course to the particular group. Tutors may also ask for feedback at various points during the course. Students complete course evaluation forms at the end of the course. These are read by the tutor who will include a summary of the feedback in their end of course report. The forms and the tutors report are read by the Award Coordinator. Should you wish to give feedback on a course directly to the Team Leader for the Interpersonal Communication Skills Certificate programme, this can be done by phone, by or by downloading a copy of the course evaluation form and returning to the team directly. Staff-Student Exchange Staff-Student exchange meetings are held each year to enable students to provide feedback about their experience of studying on our Certificate programmes and at Birkbeck in general. Students enrolled on a specific module each term are invited to come to a meeting before or after their normal class time. 21
22 7. STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES MY BIRKBECK HELPDESK The My Birkbeck website ( is your gateway to accessing all student support services at Birkbeck. You may find the following links particularly useful:- Obtaining your library/id card: Accessing IT Services: Contacting our disability office: Financial support: Study skills support: You can also visit the helpdesk on the ground floor of the main Birkbeck building on Malet Street. Opening hours are Monday to Friday from 12.00pm-7.00pm and 12.00pm-5.00pm on Saturday. You can also call the helpdesk on ADDITIONAL LEARNING SUPPORT Birkbeck s Study Skills Support team provides advice, one to one tuition and support with grammar, maths and study techniques. A diagnostic English Language test is available for those students who need guidance or advice on their English Language skills. For further information visit their website: or contact them by [email protected] or phone: If you would like the opportunity to reflect on your English language skills either because you have been educated in a language other than English or because you have not studied at HE level before, you may wish to consider this FREE online course from the Open University: Am I ready to study in English available on Additional Resources Study Guides 22
23 The following guides and websites may also be useful: Cottrell, S. (2008), The Study Skills Handbook, Palgrave Macmillan Heffernan, T.H. (2005), A Student's Guide to Studying Psychology, Psychology Press Northedge, A. (2005), The Good Study Guide, Open University Worldwide Additional Resources Websites There are hundreds, if not thousands, of websites on study skills. Not all are particularly good but the following are useful: The University of Southampton s comprehensive website on a range of study skills and study issues; some parts restricted to Southampton students but a lot of useful tips and suggestions. The Open University s website with a range of detailed guidance on study skills issues; some parts restricted to OU students but a lot of useful tips and suggestions. _research&state=none A very useful guide to doing research on the web. For specific guidance for psychologists and psychology students on getting the best out the internet. and press the play button. For specific guidance on how to avoid plagiarism in your course work. DISABILITY SUPPORT Birkbeck is committed to do everything it can to support you in your studies but to do so most effectively we need to know your needs. Specific recommendations can only be made once your needs have been assessed by our disability office and communicated to the department. Disability Statement for the Department of Psychological Sciences At Birkbeck there are students with a wide range of disabilities including dyslexia, visual or hearing impairments, mobility difficulties, mental health needs, HIV, M.E., respiratory conditions etc. Many of them have benefited from the advice and support provided by the College s disability service. 23
24 The Disability Office The College has a Disability Office located on the ground floor of the Malet Street building. We have a Disability Service Manager, Mark Pimm, and a Disability Advisor, Steve Short. Mark is your first point of referral for disability enquiries at the College whilst Steve is for dyslexia. They can provide advice and support on travel and parking, physical access, the Disabled Students Allowance, special equipment, personal support, examination arrangements etc. If you have a disability or dyslexia, we recommend you come to our drop in session where we can discuss support and make follow up appointments as necessary. The drop in sessions are between 4pm and 6pm Monday to Friday. At your first appointment at the Disability Office they will ask you to complete a Confidentiality Consent Form. This allows you to state who in the College can be informed of your disability. Remember, if you wish, we do not need to inform people of the exact nature of your disability, just your disability related needs. They will also complete an Individual Student Support Agreement form, confirming your support requirements and send this to your School and relevant Departments at the College so they are informed of your needs. Access at Birkbeck Birkbeck's main buildings have wheelchair access, accessible lifts and toilets, our reception desks have induction loops for people with hearing impairments and we have large print and tactile signage. Disabled parking, lockers, specialist seating in lectures and seminars and portable induction loops etc can all be arranged by the Disability Office. The Disabled Students Allowance UK and most EU students with disabilities on undergraduate and postgraduate courses are eligible to apply for the Disabled Students' Allowance (DSA). The DSA usually provides thousands of pounds worth of support and all the evidence shows that students who receive it are more likely to complete their courses successfully. The Disability Office can provide further information on the DSA and can assist you in applying to Student Finance England for this support. The Personal Assistance Scheme Some students need a personal assistant to provide support on their course, for example a note-taker, sign language interpreter, reader, personal assistant, disability mentor or dyslexia support tutor. Birkbeck uses a specialist agency to recruit Personal Assistants and they can assist you with recruiting, training and paying your personal assistant. Please contact Steve for information on this scheme. 24
25 Support in your Department The provision which can be made for students with disabilities by Schools and Departments is set out in the Procedures for Students with Disabilities. This is available from the Disability Office and the Disability website (see below). As mentioned above your Department will receive a copy of your Individual Student Support Agreement from the Disability Office. This will make specific recommendations about the support you should receive from the Department. Whilst we anticipate that this support will be provided by the Programme Director, tutors and Administrator the Department of Psychological Sciences also has a Student Disability Liaison Officer. If you experience any difficulties or require additional support from the Department then they may also be able to assist you. They may be contacted through the Departmental Office or the Disability Office. Support in IT Services and Library Services There is a comprehensive range of specialist equipment for students with disabilities in IT Services. This includes software packages for dyslexic students (TextHELP Read and Write and Inspiration), screen reading and character enhancing software for students with visual impairments, specialist scanning software, large monitors, ergonomic mice and keyboards, specialist orthopaedic chairs etc. For advice and assistance please contact Disability IT Support. There is also a range of specialist equipment in the Library including a CCTV reading machine for visually impaired students as well as specialist orthopaedic chairs and writing slopes. The Disability Office refers all students with disabilities to the Library Access Support service who provides a comprehensive range of services for students with disabilities. Specific Learning Difficulties (Dyslexia) Mature students who experienced problems at school are often unaware that these problems may result from their being dyslexic. Whilst dyslexia cannot be cured, you can learn strategies, which make studying significantly easier. If you think you may be dyslexic you should contact Steve, he can screen you and where appropriate refer you to an Educational Psychologist for a dyslexia assessment. These assessments cost 215. Some students can receive assistance in meeting this cost from their employer. In exceptional cases students may receive assistance from the Access to Learning Fund. The Disability Handbook The Disability Handbook provides detailed information on the support available from the College. Copies are available from all main reception areas, the Disability Office and from the College disability web site at: 25
26 For further information or to make an appointment to see Mark or Steve, please call Steve Short (Disability Advisor) on or 26
27 8. LEARNING RESOURCES Birkbeck Library All students enrolled on an award bearing module may join Birkbeck library free of charge. To join the library you will need to obtain a Birkbeck ID card which also acts as your student card. Joining the library will also give you access to electronic resources such as journals which can be accessed remotely. You may also be able to borrow books from other libraries in the SCONUL scheme. If you wish to buy books your tutor will be able to advise you on which books to buy. Syllabi for individual modules can be downloaded from our web site, which will include introductory reading lists if you would like to prepare for the module. Some modules identify preparatory reading which we recommend you undertake prior to the start of the module. Birkbeck IT Services Upon enrolment you will receive your IT Services (ITS) username and password, which you will need to access College PCs, electronic resources in the library, your My Birkbeck profile and Moodle (see below). More information about computing services provided by ITS is available at: Moodle Moodle is the name of Birkbeck s Virtual Learning Environment and an essential resource for your course. Each module will have a module shell with links to course materials and other information posted by your tutor. Moodle is accessed via: You will need your ITS username and password. 27
28 9. FURTHER STUDY One of the aims of this award is to prepare students for further study should they wish to continue. There are various ways in which students can continue with their studies following the completion of some or all of the Certificate of Higher Education: Transferring Credit towards Degree Courses in the University of London and elsewhere Students who have completed Modules for this award may sometimes find that they are able to claim exemptions from individual Modules and examinations for first degrees at other Colleges of the University of London and other institutions of higher education, including the Open University. There may be other tests for entry. Cases are assessed on a case by case basis and students should consult admissions officers of the institutions concerned. 28
29 10. DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES Location The departmental office is located in Room 501 of the main Birkbeck building on Malet Street. Opening hours are 10am 6pm, however please note that there may be occasions when no staff are in the office. If you need to see a particular member of staff then you are advised to call and make an appointment. Key contacts If you have a query regarding your courses, please do contact a member of the team: Jennifer Mackay, Administrator, Applied Psychology, Psychoanalytic Psychology and Interpersonal Communication Skills (Cert HE) courses [email protected] Rebecca Morris, Administrator, Psychology (Cert HE) and Study Skills courses [email protected] Richard Throup, Team Leader [email protected] 29
30 APPENDIX 1 (coursework marking criteria) Birkbeck College, University of London Department of Psychological Sciences MARKING CRITERIA FOR INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS COURSEWORK - Guidance for students SEPTEMBER 2012 Please ensure that you: have signed the green coursework coversheet (verifying that the work is your own and not plagiarised); have written the title of the work in full; indicated the number of words you have used Please note that: All marks given are provisional until verified by the appropriate Board of Assessors. In marking coursework, lecturers will be looking for particular evidence of: STRUCTURE How far does the essay have a coherent argument running through it? Is there some form of introduction, main body and a concluding paragraph? How far do the points follow logically from each other both between and within paragraphs? CLARITY How easy is the writing to read? is it concise and economical but not dense? is it straightforward but not simpleminded? is there enough information but not lot of unnecessary detail? is the reader left scratching their head wondering what is meant? RELEVANCE How far does the essay address its title throughout? Each paragraph should make some point which helps build the case the writer is making, or the point of view they wish to present. USE OF THE LITERATURE To what extent are books, theories, authors used in the essay? How wide has been the reading? Is it used well and appropriately? Are references quoted in the body of the essay? Is a reference list given and is it in an appropriate format? CRITICAL / EVALUATIVE PERSPECTIVE 30
31 For higher marks, the writer will show a clear awareness of a critical standpoint. For example: How for does the essay comment on weaknesses in theories, gaps in the evidence, or methodological problems? Can they compare and contrast different theories or viewpoints? How far do they have a grasp of the pros and cons of different kinds of method and evidence: (e.g., case history, survey; experiment) and can they use that awareness to evaluate the claims they make? ORIGINALITY Some form of originality will increase the likelihood of very high marks. At this level, this may be some original observations but it may also be sufficient for the student to offer their own synthesis of the material MARKING CRITERIA AND MARK BANDS Please Note: When deciding which mark range a piece of work belongs to, strong performance on one or more criteria may, at the discretion of the marker, compensate for a weaker showing on other criteria. For example if there is clear and firm evidence of good understanding and relevant reading, an essay may still be given 50 59% even if the references are poorly cited. For higher marks above 70%, all the necessary criteria must be met in full however. 0-29% Fail: Inadequate work which: Does not address the question or fundamentally fails to complete the task. Is very poorly presented or illegible. Is very poorly organised. Presents no argument or presents an argument that is confused or contradictory. Shows no relevant reading in the subject area. Demonstrates no understanding of the relevant concepts, theories or research findings (or demonstrates a complete misunderstanding of these). Sources not cited % Fail: A partial or superficial response to the task which: 31
32 Barely addresses the question or completes the task. Is poorly presented. May be overly repetitious or descriptive and may consist of a string of weak assertions that may not relate to one another or may not be supported by theory / evidence. Demonstrates very little relevant reading in the subject area. Shows very limited understanding of the key concepts and theoretical perspectives (or demonstrates significant misunderstanding). Sources inadequately cited or not cited 40-49% - An adequate piece of work that: Shows a basic understanding of the question or task but major areas may not have been addressed. The planning, structuring and presentation are relatively weak and may include a significant amount of irrelevant material. Shows evidence of some reading and attempts to address the question but is generally descriptive and/or not well supported by evidence or examples. There is limited understanding of concepts or ideas and these may be poorly or awkwardly expressed. There is a barely adequate use of sources, often over-dependent on material covered in class. Sources may be inadequately cited % - A satisfactory to good answer that: Shows a clear understanding of the question or task. Most of the essay is relevant to the question. Has a clear if simple structure but may have some gaps in argument, planning or use of evidence. The approach and content gives some evidence of reading. Demonstrates an awareness of relevant debates but may be too descriptive or generalised or may need a clearer focus. There is some evidence of engagement with and analysis of material presented in the module. Appropriate sources adequately cited and referenced % - A very good piece of work and complete examination of the task that: Has a coherent and logical structure to the answer and is well written, organised and presented. Shows wide reading/learning of relevant facts/theories and research. 32
33 Has no irrelevant passages; the whole answer is fully focussed on the title. Gives clear evidence of understanding of concepts or ideas. Offers critical analysis and a clear argument backed by appropriate examples/evidence. Makes good use of sources with evidence correctly cited and referenced % - An excellent or outstanding piece of work that includes all the elements of the previous plus also: Makes well structured arguments that are theoretically informed, with very good use of relevant evidence. Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of concepts and debates and an ability to think critically. Gives clear evidence of awareness of current/relevant debates and study well beyond the scope of class material. Offers clear evidence of an understanding of any relevant ethical considerations. Offers a wide range of references, and is fully and correctly referenced throughout. 80% and above - An exceptional piece of work that includes all the elements of the previous plus also: An excellent knowledge and understanding of concepts and debates and an exceptional ability to think critically. Makes well structured arguments that demonstrate exceptional mastery of relevant theory and research evidence. Includes some significant novel or original aspect, angle or perspective. Demonstrates particularly insightful understanding. 33
34 APPENDIX 2 (presentation marking criteria) Birkbeck College, University of London Department of Psychological Sciences MARKING CRITERIA FOR INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS PRESENTATIONS - Guidance for students SEPTEMBER 2012 Please ensure that you: have signed the green coursework coversheet (verifying that the work is your own and not plagiarised); have written the title of the work in full; have included a copy of all handouts and/or power point slides used Please note that: All marks given are provisional until verified by the appropriate Board of Assessors. In marking presentations, lecturers will be looking for particular evidence of: STRUCTURE How far does the presentation have a coherent argument running through it? Is there some form of introduction, main body and a conclusion? How far do the points follow logically from each other both between and within paragraphs? CLARITY How easy is the presentation to follow? is it concise and economical but not dense? is it straightforward but not simpleminded? is there enough information but not lot of unnecessary detail? is the reader left scratching their head wondering what is meant? RELEVANCE How far does the presentation address its title throughout? Is the topic clearly related to the contents of the course syllabus? USE OF SOURCES To what extent are books, theories, authors referred in the presentation? How wide has been the reading? Is it used well and appropriately? Is a reference list given and is it in an appropriate format? TIMING Does the presentation start on time? Does it finish with a few minutes to spare for questions? 34
35 Is it well-paced? Not too fast, not too slow? NON-VERBAL BEHAVIOUR Is eye-contact used appropriately? Posture and positioning; is body posture relaxed but confident? Does the speaker move around appropriately as they speak? Is the voice effectively projected? VISUAL AIDS Are handouts appropriate? The right number, the right level of detail? Power point slides; are they helpful, legible, friendly? GENERAL Does the speaker inspire confidence in their mastery of the material? Does the speaker engage the audience? CRITICAL / EVALUATIVE PERSPECTIVE For higher marks, the presentation will show a clear awareness of a critical standpoint. For example: How for does the presentation identify strengths and weaknesses of any theory or approach discussed? Does it compare and contrast different theories or viewpoints? ORIGINALITY Some form of originality will increase the likelihood of very high marks. Does the presentation clearly go beyond the material covered in class? Does it identify an unusual or new area or application of communication skills? MARKING CRITERIA AND MARK BANDS Please Note: When deciding which mark range a piece of work belongs to, strong performance on one or more criteria may, at the discretion of the marker, compensate for a weaker showing on other criteria. For example if NVC and timing are particularly strong, a presentation may be still be given 60 69% even if the reading is not particularly wide. For higher marks above 70%, all the necessary criteria must be met in 35
36 full however. 0-29% Fail: Inadequate work which: Does not address the question or fundamentally fails to complete the task. Is very poorly presented or inaudible. Is very poorly organised/badly mistimed Presents no argument or presents an argument that is confused or contradictory. Shows no relevant reading in the subject area. Demonstrates no understanding of the relevant concepts, theories or research findings (or demonstrates a complete misunderstanding of these). Sources not cited % Fail: A partial or superficial response to the task which: Barely addresses the question or completes the task. is badly timed and/or poorly paced Demonstrates unconvincing NVC; has non-existent or very poor quality visual aids Is unrelated to the contents of the module May be overly repetitious or consist of a string of weak assertions that may not relate to one another or may not be supported by theory / evidence. Demonstrates very little relevant reading in the subject area. Shows very limited understanding of the key concepts and theoretical perspectives (or demonstrates significant misunderstanding). Sources inadequately cited or not cited 40-49% - An adequate piece of work that: Shows a basic understanding of the question or task but major areas may not have been addressed. The planning, structuring and presentation are relatively weak and may include a significant amount of irrelevant material. Timing, visual aids and NVC are adequate but may still be in need of improvement Shows evidence of some reading but is not well supported by evidence or examples. There is limited understanding of concepts or ideas and these may be poorly or awkwardly expressed. Sources may be inadequately cited % - A satisfactory to good answer that: 36
37 Shows a clear understanding of the question or task. Most of the presentation is relevant to the material covered in class Has a clear if simple structure but may have some gaps in argument, planning or use of evidence. Timing, visual aids and NVC are solid and satisfactory. The approach and content gives some evidence of reading. Demonstrates an awareness of relevant debates but may be too descriptive or generalised or may need a clearer focus. There is some evidence of engagement with and analysis of material presented in the module. Appropriate sources adequately cited and referenced % - A very good piece of work and complete examination of the task that: Has a coherent and logical structure to the answer and is well organised and presented. Shows wide reading/learning of relevant facts/theories and research. Has no irrelevant passages; the whole answer is fully focussed on the title. Gives clear evidence of understanding of concepts or ideas. NVC and timing are appropriate and effective visual aids are well-prepared, relevant and helpful Offers critical analysis and a clear argument backed by appropriate examples/evidence. Makes good use of sources with evidence correctly cited and referenced % - An excellent or outstanding piece of work that includes all the elements of the previous plus also: Makes well structured arguments that are theoretically informed, with very good use of relevant evidence. Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of concepts and debates and an ability to think critically. Gives clear evidence of awareness of current/relevant debates and study well beyond the scope of class material. NVC, timing and visual aids are all highly effective Offers a wide range of references, and is fully and correctly referenced throughout. 80% and above - An exceptional piece of work that includes all the elements of the previous plus also: An excellent knowledge and understanding of concepts and debates and an 37
38 exceptional ability to think critically. Makes well structured arguments that demonstrate exceptional mastery of relevant theory and research evidence. NVC and visual aids are particularly sparkling and impactful Includes some significant novel or original aspect, angle or perspective. Demonstrates particularly insightful understanding. 38
COURSE HANDBOOK 2014/15. Certificate of Higher Education in PSYCHOLOGY
COURSE HANDBOOK 2014/15 Certificate of Higher Education in PSYCHOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2014 WELCOME TO NEW STUDENTS On behalf of all the staff of the Department of Psychological Sciences, may I welcome you to
SOAS (University of London) GUIDANCE NOTES, PROCEDURES, AND CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES RELATING TO TAUGHT MASTERS PROGRAMMES
SOAS (University of London) July 2013 GUIDANCE NOTES, PROCEDURES, AND CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES RELATING TO TAUGHT MASTERS PROGRAMMES 1 Registration, enrolment and re-enrolment Before beginning their programmes
Programme Specification. MRes Developmental Psychology. Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences
Programme Specification MRes Developmental Psychology Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION Awarding body: Teaching institution and location: Final
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc Psychology
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc Psychology 1. Awarding institution/body University of Worcester 2. Teaching institution University of Worcester 3. Programme accredited by British Psychological Society 4. Final
Participants Teachers and other education professionals concerned with mathematics education from all phases of schooling.
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Mathematics Education Awarding Institution: University College London Teaching Institution: UCL Institute of Education Name of final award MA Master of Arts (MA) in Mathematics
Programme Specification. MSc Accounting. Valid from: September 2014 Faculty of Business
Programme Specification MSc Accounting Valid from: September 2014 Faculty of Business 1 SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION Awarding body: Teaching institution and location: Final award: Programme title: Interim
MSc Financial Risk and Investment Analysis
School of Business, Management and Economics Department of Business and Management MSc Financial Risk and Investment Analysis Course Handbook 2013/14 2013 Entry Table of Contents School of Business, Management
Postgraduate Taught Degree Regulations 2014-2015
Postgraduate Taught Degree Regulations 2014-2015 These regulations must be read in conjunction with the General Regulations for Students, the Postgraduate Taught Degree Classification Scheme and the Postgraduate
MSc in Global Supply Chain and Logistics Management
MSc in Global Supply Chain and Logistics Management Course Handbook 2015/16 2015 Entry Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Course Outline... 3 Course Structure... 3 Modules and Convenors... 3 Syllabus...
ACADEMIC AWARD REGULATIONS Framework and Regulations for Professional Doctorates. Approval for this regulation given by :
ACADEMIC AWARD REGULATIONS Framework and Regulations for Professional Doctorates Name of regulation : Purpose of regulation : Approval for this regulation given by : Responsibility for its update : Regulation
Teaching institution: Institute of Education, University of London
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Doctor in Education Awarding body: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching institution: Institute of Education, University of London Name of the final award: Doctor
UNIVERSITY OF DERBY Faculty of Business, Computing & Law Derby Business School. BA (Hons) Business Management. Programme Handbook
UNIVERSITY OF DERBY Faculty of Business, Computing & Law Derby Business School BA (Hons) Business Management Programme Handbook 2015-2016 UNIVERSITY OF DERBY Faculty of Business, Computing & Law Derby
MA/Postgraduate Diploma in Counselling
MA/Postgraduate Diploma in Counselling Awarding Institution: The University of Reading Teaching Institution: The University of Reading Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences Programme length: 36 months
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc Speech, Language and Communication Needs in Schools: Advanced Practice
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc Speech, Language and Communication Needs in Schools: Advanced Practice Awarding body: Institute of Education, University of London / City University London Teaching Institutions:
ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION This document describes the Doctorate in Clinical Psychology. This specification is valid for new entrants and current students from September
RESEARCH DEGREE REGULATIONS
RESEARCH DEGREE REGULATIONS These regulations apply to programmes of study leading to the award of Master of Philosophy and Doctor of Philosophy, including the Doctor of Philosophy awarded on the basis
Programme Specification. MSc Human Resource Management. Valid from: September 2015 Faculty of Business
Programme Specification MSc Human Resource Management Valid from: September 2015 Faculty of Business SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION Awarding body: Teaching institution and location: Final award: Programme
Programme Specification PG Cert/ PG Dip/ MA Integrative Counselling
Programme Specification PG Cert/ PG Dip/ MA Integrative Counselling 1. Awarding institution/body University of Worcester 2. Teaching institution The Iron Mill Institute, Exeter PCI College, Dublin 3. Programme
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA/MSc Psychology of Education and the MA Education (Psychology)
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA/MSc Psychology of Education and the MA Education (Psychology) Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching Institution: Institute of Education,
Mart325 Services Marketing COURSE OUTLINE
COURSE OUTLINE Semester One, 2012 Table of Contents Paper Description and Aims... 3 Learning Outcomes... 3 Teaching Staff... 3 Course Delivery... 4 Expectations and Workload... 5 Course Materials and Course
MSc in Management and Entrepreneurship
MSc in Management and Entrepreneurship Course Handbook 2015/16 MSc in Management and Entrepreneurship Course Handbook 2015/16 2015 Entry Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Course Outline... 3 Course Structure...
1. Awarding Institution: Imperial College London. 2. Teaching Institution: Imperial College London
Programme Specification for the MSc in Mathematics and Finance PLEASE NOTE. This specification provides a concise summary of the main features of the programme and the learning outcomes that a typical
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award MA 4 Programme Title MA in the History of the Americas 5 UCAS/Programme Code
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award Pg Diploma or MSc 4 Programme Title Healthcare Management 5 Programme Code
Teaching Institution: Institute of Education, University of London
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA in Special and Inclusive Education Awarding body: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching Institution: Institute of Education, University of London Name of final
MSc Financial Risk and Investment Analysis
MSc Financial Risk and Investment Analysis Course Handbook 2015/16 2015 Entry Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Course Outline... 3 Course Structure... 3 Syllabus Autumn Term... 3 Syllabus Spring Term...
Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London. Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University
MSc in International Marketing Course Handbook 2015/16
MSc in International Marketing Course Handbook 2015/16 2015 Entry Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Course Outline... 2 Modules and Convenors... 3 Syllabus... 3 Full-time Syllabus... 3 Part-time Syllabus
2.2 Assessors shall not be members of Boards or Joint Boards of Examiners and shall not be entitled unless invited to attend their meetings.
Regulations for the Examination of Master s Level Degrees 1 Appointment of Examiners 1 Definition of Terms Used: Examiners 1.1 Members of Boards of Examiners shall be designated as Examiners, as follows:
Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London. Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc Psychology of Education Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London Details of accreditation
MA EDUCATION MA Education: Childhood and Youth Studies MA Education: Higher Education MA Education: Leadership and Management MA Education: TESOL
Programme Specification MA EDUCATION MA Education: Childhood and Youth Studies MA Education: Higher Education MA Education: Leadership and Management MA Education: TESOL PGCert Artist Teacher PGCert Challenging
Mode of Study The MPH course will be delivered full-time and part-time on campus at the Kedleston Road site
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION DOCUMENT SECTION ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION Programme Title/ Subject Title: Master of Public Health Award title and Interim awards: Postgraduate Certificate in Public Health Postgraduate
Dept. of Psychological Sciences. BSc Psychology. Handbook. 3-Year Full-Time Programme 2012-13
Dept. of Psychological Sciences BSc Psychology Handbook 3-Year Full-Time Programme 2012-13 1 Contents Introduction Welcome from Director of Undergraduate Studies 5 Programme of Study Aim and learning outcomes
IV. Masters Degree Progress Regulations, Taught and Research (excluding MPhil programmes)
IV. Masters Degree Progress Regulations, Taught and Research (excluding MPhil programmes) These regulations shall be understood in conjunction with requirements laid down in the General Regulations and
MSc in Global Supply Chain and Logistics Management
School of Business, Management and Economics Department of Business and Management MSc in Global Supply Chain and Logistics Management Course Handbook 2013/14 2013 Entry Table of Contents School of Business,
Cleveland College of Art & Design BA (Hons) Fashion Enterprise Programme Handbook 2013-2014 1
Cleveland College of Art & Design BA (Hons) Fashion Enterprise Programme Handbook 2013-2014 1 BA (Hons) Fashion Enterprise Programme Handbook 2013-2014 Your Programme Handbook provides you with a range
Arts, Humanities and Social Science Faculty
LLB Law For students entering Part 1 in 2011/2 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification: Programme Director:
Programme Specification. MSc Business Management. Valid from: September 2015 Faculty of Business
Programme Specification MSc Business Management Valid from: September 2015 Faculty of Business SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION Awarding body: Teaching institution and location: Final award: Programme title:
Programme name Civil Engineering, Civil Engineering with Industrial Placement
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Civil Engineering, Civil Engineering with Industrial Placement Award BEng (Hons) School School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering Department
Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London. Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Primary Education (Policy and Practice) Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London
Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Higher and Professional Education Awarding body: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London Name of final
Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London. Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Education and Technology Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London Name of final
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMMES
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMMES KEY FACTS Programme name Criminal Litigation Award LLM School The City Law School Department or equivalent Professional Courses Programme code PSCRML Type
Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA in Education and International Development Awarding body: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London Name
Teaching institution: Institute of Education, University of London
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Geography in Education Awarding body: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching institution: Institute of Education, University of London Name of the final award:
ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION This document describes the Masters in Business Administration programme, Postgraduate Diploma and Postgraduate Certificate in International
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award MA or Diploma 4 Programme Title Modern and Contemporary Studies 5 UCAS/Programme
Programme Specification (Undergraduate) Date amended: 28 August 2015
Programme Specification (Undergraduate) Date amended: 28 August 2015 1. Programme Title(s) and UCAS code(s): BSc Mathematics and Actuarial Science (including year in industry option) 2. Awarding body or
Henley Business School. Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Henley Business School Board of Studies for
BA Accounting and Business For students entering Part 1 in 2014/5 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification:
UCL IOE Doctor in Educational Psychology (DEdPsy) Regulations 2015-16 (New Students)
UCL Academic Manual 2015-16 Chapter 8: Derogations and Variations UCL Institute of Education UCL IOE Doctor in Educational Psychology (DEdPsy) Regulations 2015-16 (New Students) Contact: Lizzie Vinton,
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Course Title: Masters in Business Administration (MBA) /Postgraduate Diploma/Postgraduate Certificate in Business Administration Modes of Study: Full Time/Part Time (Executive Variant)/Distance
MANT 221 COMMUNICATION SKILLS 2011 COURSE OUTLINE 1st semester 18 points 0.1500 efts
MANT 221 COMMUNICATION SKILLS 2011 COURSE OUTLINE 1st semester 18 points 0.1500 efts Course prerequisites MANT 111 or BSNS105, and MANT 112 or MANT 102 or any 108 points Course Focus This paper aims to
BSc Social Science. Student Handbook 2010/11 DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
BSc Social Science Student Handbook 2010/11 DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY Contents Welcome to the BSc Social Sciences..4 General Information...5 Enrolment...5
Faculty of Education, Health and Sciences. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION BA Applied Social Work. Valid from September 2012. www.derby.ac.
Faculty of Education, Health and Sciences PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION BA Applied Social Work Valid from September 2012 www.derby.ac.uk/ehs CONTENTS SECTION ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION... 1 SECTION TWO: OVERVIEW
Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Henley Business School Board of Studies for
BSc in Accounting and Finance For students entering Part 1 in 2014/5 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification:
Programme name International Business Law (distance learning)
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMMES KEY FACTS Programme name International Business Law (distance learning) Award LLM School The City Law School Department or equivalent Academic Courses Programme
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award MSc / Postgraduate Diploma 4 Programme Title Sustainable Chemical Engineering
A. Knowledge and Understanding of:... 3 B. Cognitive (Intellectual or Thinking) Skills, able to:... 4
[BA (Hons) Human Resource Management (Informatics) Programme Specification Primary Purpose: Course management, monitoring and quality assurance. Secondary Purpose: Detailed information for students, staff
SCHOOL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
ILM Level 5 Diploma SCHOOL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT Cohort One Induction Unit 2016 Getting started... This induction module offers an overview of your Level 5 course and outlines the key information you will
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Educational Planning, Economics, and International Development
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Educational Planning, Economics, and International Development Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education,
Henley Business School. Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Henley Business School Board of Studies for
BA Accounting and Business For students entering Part 1 in 2012/3 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification:
MSc International Management & International Relations
Programme Specification MSc International Management & International Relations Valid from: September 2015 Faculty of Business & Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION Awarding
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc in Child Development. Awarding body: University College London. Teaching Institution: UCL Institute of Education
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc in Child Development Awarding body: University College London Teaching Institution: UCL Institute of Education Details of accreditation by a professional/statutory body The
IAM Level 4. Diploma in Business and Administrative Management. Qualification handbook. 2011 edition
IAM Level 4 Diploma in Business and Administrative Management Qualification handbook 2011 edition Published by the IAM IAM 2011 Registered charity number 254807 Published 2011 All rights reserved. This
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award Master of Science (MSc) 4 Programme Title Advanced Computer Science 5 Programme
Knowledge and Understanding
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award MSc 4 Programme Title MSc Psychology (Foundations in Clinical and Health Psychology)
1.2 The Chairman of the Board of Examiners shall be a member of the academic staff of the College.
Regulations for the Examination of Taught Master s Degrees 1 Appointment of Examiners 1 Boards of Examiners 1.1 A Chairman and External Examiners for each Master s Degree course shall be appointed annually
Programme Specification for the MSc in Computing Science
Programme Specification for the MSc in Computing Science PLEASE NOTE. This specification provides a concise summary of the main features of the programme and the learning outcomes that a typical student
QAA Subject Benchmarking Group: Business and Management (2007)
MSc in Facilities Management (for External Students) For students entering in 2012 Awarding Institution: The University of Reading Teaching Institution: The College of Estate Management QAA Subject Benchmarking
B1: Programme Specification HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE
B1: Programme Specification PROGRAMME TITLE: PgC/PgD/MSc in ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE PLEASE NOTE. This specification provides a concise summary of the main features of the programme
Programme Specification MASTER OF STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Programme Specification MASTER OF STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 1 Awarding body University of Cambridge 2 Teaching institution Faculty of Human, Social and Political Science 3 Accreditation details
Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Chartered Institute of Management Accounting (CIMA) Certificate Level (C01 to C05)
MSc Accounting and International Management (full-time) For students entering in 2015/6 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length:
College of Life and Natural Sciences PROGRAMME HANDBOOK. for. BSc (Hons) Psychological Studies
College of Life and Natural Sciences PROGRAMME HANDBOOK for BSc (Hons) Psychological Studies 2014-2015 CONTENTS Introduction...1 The First week and beyond...2 Textbook and pre-reading... 2 Structure of
Programme Specifications
Programme Specifications ADVANCED DIPLOMA IN THE STUDY OF RELIGION 1 Awarding body University of Cambridge 2 Teaching institution University of Cambridge Institute of Continuing Education * 3 Accreditation
MBA/PGDip/PGCert in Construction and Real Estate N/A For students entering in 2009
MBA/PGDip/PGCert in Construction and Real Estate N/A For students entering in 2009 UCAS Code: Awarding Institution: The University of Reading Teaching Institution: College of Estate Management Faculty:
MODULE CO-ORDINATOR HANDBOOK. Collaborative Partners
MODULE CO-ORDINATOR HANDBOOK Collaborative Partners January 2012 GENERAL INFORMATION Who is this handbook for? This handbook is for staff working at collaborative partner organisations, who are responsible
Programme Specification Postgraduate Programmes
Programme Specification Postgraduate Programmes Awarding Body/Institution Teaching Institution University of London Goldsmiths, University of London Name of Final Award and Programme Title MA in Practice
NEEDS AND DISABILITIES MA ND DISABILITIES MA SPECIAL ECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS AL NEEDS AND DISABILITIES S MA SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL
PECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS NEEDS AND DISABILITIES MA ND DISABILITIES MA SPECIAL ECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS AL NEEDS AND DISABILITIES S MA SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND CHILDREN S SERVICES ACADEMIC
REGULATION 5.1 HIGHER DOCTORATES, THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATES AND MASTERS DEGREES BY RESEARCH
REGULATION 5.1 HIGHER DOCTORATES, THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATES AND MASTERS DEGREES BY RESEARCH PART A GENERAL PART B HIGHER DOCTORATES PART B THE SCHEDULE PART C THE DEGREE
How To Become A Financial Economist
Programme Specification Master of Science Financial Economics Valid from: September 2014 Faculty of Business SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION Awarding body: Teaching institution and location: Final award:
MBA in Construction and Real Estate. Date of specification: September 2011-12
MBA in Construction and Real Estate UCAS Code: N/A For continuing students entering in: September 2011 Awarding Institution: The University of Reading Teaching Institution: College of Estate Management
MANT 214 Personnel/Human Resource Management Semester 1 2010. Department of Management School of Business University of Otago COURSE OUTLINE
MANT 214 Personnel/Human Resource Management Semester 1 2010 Department of Management School of Business University of Otago COURSE OUTLINE MANT 214 Personnel/Human Resource Management Semester 1, 2010
How To Prepare For Welcome Week At The University Of Germany
Faculty of Health & Human Sciences School of Health Professions MA Social Work Welcome Week Information Academic Year 2015 If you require a copy of this handbook in an alternative format please contact
6.2 Regulations for Graduate Certificate and Graduate Diploma
6.2 Regulations for Graduate Certificate and Graduate Diploma Introduction 1 The University s courses are designed to prepare students for progression to Masters level work or equivalent professional work.
V2 Programme Specification HNC Level 4 Diploma in Electrical and Electronic Engineering
V2 Programme Specification HNC Level 4 Diploma in Electrical and Electronic Engineering V2HE 1. Awarding Organisation Pearson 2. Teaching Institution Highbury College Portsmouth 3. Programme Accredited
PROGRAMMME SPECIFICATION FOR MA in LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE SERVICES)
PROGRAMMME SPECIFICATION FOR MA in LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE SERVICES) MA in LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE SERVICES) 1. Award 2. Route Management (Health and
REGULATIONS: SCHOOL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY FREMANTLE AND BROOME
REGULATIONS: SCHOOL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY FREMANTLE AND BROOME Purpose: These School Regulations apply to all students in the courses and units offered by the Schools of Nursing and Midwifery at the
2015 2016 master s courses fashion promotion, communication & media
2015 2016 master s courses fashion promotion, communication & media postgraduate programmes master s course fashion promotion, communication & media 02 Brief Overview Brief Descriptive Summary These Master
Post-graduate Programmes in Construction. Royal Institution of Chartered surveyors (RICS), Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB)
MSc in Project Management (full-time) For students entering in 2014/5 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification:
Department of Politics and International Studies. Information for Undergraduates. BA International Relations BA International Relations and
Department of Politics and International Studies Information for Undergraduates BA International Relations BA International Relations and 2014/15 1 To use the QR barcodes in this booklet: 1. Download a
Approved by the Health and Care Professions Council
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Master of Arts in Social Work Awarding institution Teaching institution UCAS Code JACS Code Programme Duration Language of Programme Liverpool John Moores University LIVERPOOL JOHN
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1. Programme Title BA (Hons) Counselling 2. Name of final Award (s) 3. Awarding body/institution 4. Teaching institution 5. Mode (s) of Delivery GENERAL INFORMATION BA (Hons) Counselling
MA in Education (Dance Teaching) Programme Specification
MA in Education (Dance Teaching) 1. Awarding Body University of Bath (subject to final agreement) 2. Teaching Institution (if different) 3. Final Award MA in Education (Dance Teaching) 4. Programme title/route/pathway
Regulations for Bachelors and Integrated Masters Awards 2015
Regulations for Bachelors and Integrated Masters Awards 2015 CONTENTS 1 SCOPE OF THESE REGULATIONS... 2 2 GENERAL PRECONDITIONS TO AN AWARD... 2 3 COURSE REQUIREMENTS... 2 4 DURATION OF COURSE... 4 5 MODULE
