Based on these facts, you have raised the following questions:
|
|
- Percival Richards
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 r ^)1j OHIO STATE BAR gr ill ASSOCIATION,. ElI 1880 OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion April 10, 2012 Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion You have requested the opinion of the Ohio State Bar Association Committee on Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct on several questions regarding your participation in trade shows and professional conferences. You are counsel to a "professional group" that consists of businesses in the human resource sector. The professional group promotes its members through some joint educational and marketing efforts, although the business entities retain their separate identities. The members of the professional group occasionally refer people in need of counsel on employment issues to you. The professional group intends to have a booth at several upcoming trade shows and conferences, with the cost of the booths being shared by members. Based on these facts, you have raised the following questions: 1. May you help staff the client's trade-show booth? You would be present in the booth during the show, wearing a name tag with your law firm's name. The name tag would not refer to the client or bear the client's logo. 2. May you share in the cost of the trade-show booth (booth rental, marketing materials, etc.)? 3. If people who stop at the trade-show booth voluntarily provide their contact information, may you use the information later for electronic or postal mailings, with the general aim of marketing your legal services? The Committee concludes that the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct do not prohibit the above conduct, provided that you comply with all aspects of the relevant rules, as explained below. Background: In 1999, the Ohio Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline ("Board") issued Opinion 99-5, which dealt with lawyer marketing activity at fairs, festivals and similar public events. Ohio Adv. Op (Ohio Bd. Comm. on Griev. & Discp. Oct. 8, 1999) (available at yy mhms). Opinion 99-5 does not provide complete guidance specific to the inquiry above, however, because the Board there focused chiefly on whether lawyers may distribute law firm brochures at such events. In Opinion 99-5, the Board held that personally handing law firm brochures to people passing by at a fair would violate DR 2-101(F)(1) of the former Code of Professional HEADQUARTERS MAILING ADDRESS PHONE OO Lake SHip Drive P.O. Box i5s61 (*1 1l l 2O.HG FAx 6":4 '" L"o k il, C,hio X 15; 0, 9 I Ohio h rn62 HOC.)-; J c, O 6 WEB,%)t ;aeorp
2 Responsibility, which prohibited any solicitation of legal business in person, subject to exceptions for close friends, relatives, existing clients or former clients. (Id. at syl., 2.) In contrast, the Board held, giving a brochure in person to someone who requested one would be permissible, as would simply displaying brochures at a fair or other event, and allowing people to take them voluntarily. (Id. at 3.) In general, the restrictions on in-person solicitation contained in the former Disciplinary Rules and referenced in Opinion 99-5 have been incorporated in the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct, which became effective February 1, Applicable Rules of Professional Conduct: Your request for an opinion requires consideration of the following rules of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct ( ORPC or Rules ): 1.6 (lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client, subject to certain exceptions). 1.7, cmt. [3]; 1.9 (lawyer shall not accept representation if a conflict of interest would be created, and should adopt reasonable procedures for identifying conflicts). 7.1 (lawyer shall not make or use a false, misleading, or non-verifiable communication about the lawyer or the lawyer s services). 7.2(b)(1) 7.3(a) 7.3(c) (lawyer may not give anything of value in exchange for recommendation, but may pay reasonable costs of permissible advertisements or communications). (lawyer shall not solicit professional employment by in-person contact when significant motive is pecuniary gain, unless person contacted is a lawyer, or has a family relationship, close personal relationship or prior professional relationship with the lawyer). (requirements for soliciting professional employment from prospective client by means of written or electronic communication). Opinion: 1. Staffing a Client s Trade-Show Booth The Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct do not prohibit lawyers from helping to staff a client s booth at a trade show. Lawyers who wish to assist a client in this way, however, are cautioned in several regards. First, lawyers must avoid misrepresenting their role or function. Rule 7.1 bars communications about the lawyer or the lawyer s services that are false or misleading. When assisting at the client s booth, the lawyer can help avoid any misleading impression that the lawyer is an employee of the professional group by wearing a name tag that clearly identifies the lawyer s name and law firm and does not bear the client s name or logo. In addition, the - 2 -
3 lawyer s verbal exchanges with people entering the booth must accurately represent the lawyer s status as counsel for the client, and dispel any misconception that the lawyer is associated with the client s business in some other capacity. Second, lawyers participating in a booth at a trade show or similar event must not solicit people passing by. Rule 7.3(a) prohibits in-person solicitation for profit, subject to exceptions for in-person contact with other lawyers, family members, close personal friends and current or former clients. In connection with lawyers operating a booth at a state fair, the ABA Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has defined solicitation as the lawyer s approach to a lay person who has not sought out the lawyer for possible representation. ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof l Resp., Inf. Op , 1 (May 20, 1985) (involving a lawyer opening a temporary booth at a state fair to prepare simple wills). An example of such impermissible inperson solicitation would be standing at the entrance of the client s booth, greeting people passing by and offering them law firm literature or inviting them to enter the booth for the purpose of offering or providing legal services. Similarly, under the former Code of Professional Responsibility, the Board in Opinion 99-5 barred lawyers from actively offering law firm brochures to passers-by at a fair. Rule 7.3 s ban on in-person solicitation does not apply where the prospective client initiates the communication. See ORPC 7.3(a) cmt. [7] (specifying that Rule 7.3 does not apply to communications made in response to requests from clients or prospective clients ). This carve-out is consistent with the Board s ruling in Opinion 99-5 that lawyers may simply leave brochures out for prospective clients to take voluntarily. Therefore, a lawyer staffing a client s booth at a trade show may respond to inquiries initiated by people who voluntarily enter the booth, and may hand them law-firm literature at their request, or may simply provide a stack of literature for people to take at their option. 1 1 Ethics opinions from the ABA and from several jurisdictions underscore the contrast between handing literature to passers-by at an event (prohibited as in-person solicitation ) and responding to a request for literature, or even legal services, initiated by the prospective client (permitted). See ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof l Resp., Inf. Op , 1 (May 20, 1985) (where there is no effort at hawking or enticing prospective clients into the booth, lawyer may work from a booth at a state fair to prepare simple wills while clients wait); Ariz. Jud. Adv. Op (Ariz. Sup. Ct. Jud. Eth. Adv. Comm. Sept. 2002) (lawyer may sponsor booth at business exposition and engage in face-to-face contacts with visitors, so long as contact is initiated by visitors); Kan. Leg. Ethics Op (Kan. Bar Ass n Apr. 2, 1998) (lawyer may not personally hand brochures to passers-by at trade shows; such advertising involves direct solicitation of prospective clients) (unpublished opinion, available from Kansas Bar Association on request); Mich. Eth. Op. RI-99 (Mich. St. Comm. on Prof l & Jud. Ethics Sept. 20, 1991) (law firm co-sponsoring seminar with hospital may set up booth outside seminar room to market the firm, provided attendees have option to stop at booth or not); Mo. Inf. Adv. Op (Mo. Bar Ass n, undated) (lawyer may occupy a booth at a trade show, but must only respond to contact initiated by attendees; contact initiated by lawyer would violate prohibition against in-person solicitation); Pa. Eth. Op B (Pa. Bar Ass n Comm. on Leg. Eth. & Prof l Resp. Jan. 16, 1991) (setting up a booth at a trade show and discussing legal issues with people who voluntarily approach booth is equivalent to establishing a law office available to people desiring to come into that office to consult); Utah Eth. Op (Utah St. Bar. June 30, 1999) (lawyer may set up information booth at trade show and (1) may provide advice when request is initiated by prospective client; and (2) may make business cards and literature available to those who, without in-person encouragement, choose to take them). Contra, Md. Eth. Dkt (Md. St. Bar Ass n Comm. on Ethics 2004) (the very reason for having trade show booth is to entice attendees to approach [the] booth and then hire [the law firm] ; lawyer s booth would be fraught with potential problems of in-person solicitation, even if it might not violate ethics rules per se) (unpublished opinion, available from Maryland Bar Association on request)
4 Last, the casual atmosphere of a trade show might not be conducive either to the privacy or the conflict-checking procedures necessary to the rendering of legal advice, as called for under ORPC Rule 1.6 (confidentiality of client information), Rule 1.7 and cmt. [3] (current-client conflicts of interest and duty to adopt conflict-checking procedures) and Rule 1.9 (former-client conflicts of interest). Therefore, in the event that a lawyer at a trade show is approached with a request for legal advice, it might be advisable to urge the prospective client to make an office appointment. 2. Sharing in the Cost of a Trade-Show Booth Rule 7.2(b)(1) prohibits paying for referrals, but permits lawyers to pay the reasonable costs of permissible advertisements or communications. (Id.) The trade-show booth that is the subject of this inquiry is for the primary benefit of the client s marketing efforts, not the lawyer s. Nonetheless, the lawyer presumably will derive benefit as well (including by gathering contact information for future marketing communications see 3 below). Thus, even if the trade-show booth is not deemed an advertisement for the lawyer, it may benefit her by facilitating future communications with prospective clients within the terms of Rule 7.2(b)(1). Therefore, the lawyer may share with her client in the cost of booths at trade shows and similar events. 3. Gathering Contact Information and Using it for Future Marketing The contact information of trade-show attendees might be gathered in various ways, with varying results under the Rules. For instance, people who stop by the booth might be invited to put their contact information on a list with the heading Please send me information about legal services available from your law firm. In that event, the potential client has requested future communication, which removes subsequent marketing efforts from the scope of Rule 7.3. (Id. at cmt. [7].) (Of course, such future marketing efforts would still be required to comply with Rule 7.1 s prohibitions against false, misleading, or non-verifiable communications.) On the other hand, the trade group sponsoring the booth might invite people stopping by to add their business cards to a bowl, promising a prize to the person whose card is selected in a random drawing. In that event, and under similar circumstances, a lawyer s use of the contact information for marketing the lawyer s services must be in accord with Rules 7.1, 7.3(a) and 7.3(c). Under Rule 7.3(a), a lawyer must not contact in person (e.g., by telephone) a potential client that has not initiated or requested information from the lawyer, assuming that the addressee is not another lawyer, a family member, a close personal friend, a client or a former client. Thus, subject to the Rule 7.3(a) exceptions, a lawyer or law firm should not contact in person those people who left their business cards at the trade show booth. Under Rule 7.3(c), postal mail or sent with a view towards soliciting professional employment must: (1) disclose how the lawyer became aware of the identity and legal need of the addressee; (2) disclaim or refrain from expressing any pre-determined evaluation of the merits of the addressee s situation; and (3) include in the text and on the outside of the envelope and/or at the beginning and ending of any electronic communication the recital Advertising Material or Advertisement Only. In its Opinion , the Board held that Rule 7.3(c) is - 4 -
5 triggered whenever the communication is personalized by being addressed to a contact person at the business. Ohio Adv. Op , syl. (Ohio Bd. Comm. on Griev. & Discp. June 8, 2007) (available at Therefore, in the random-card-drawing situation described above, where the prospective clients have not expressly requested further information, follow-up marketing communications that will be personalized with their names must conform to the requirements of Rule 7.3(c). Conclusion: In summary, you are advised that the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct do not prohibit you from helping to staff your client s booth at trade shows and similar events, sharing in the cost of the booth or using attendee contact information gathered at the trade show in future marketing of your legal practice, provided that you comply with applicable Rules, including Rules 1.6, 1.7, 1.9, 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3. Sincerely, Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Committee OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Note: Advisory Opinions of the Ohio State Bar Association Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Committee are informal, non-binding opinions in response to prospective or hypothetical questions regarding the application of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary, the Rules of Professional Conduct, the Code of Judicial Conduct, and the Attorney s Oath of Office
OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion 2012-02. June 20, 2012. Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion
OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION EST I880 OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion 2012-02 June 20, 2012 Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion You have requested the opinion of the Ohio State Bar Association Committee
More informationOPINION 2015-2 Issued August 7, 2015. Direct In-person Solicitation of Prospective Clients at Seminars
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov PAUL M. DE MARCO CHAIR WILLIAM J. NOVAK VICE-
More informationOPINION 2012-2 Issued June 8, 2012. Identification of Nonlawyers on Law Firm Letterhead, Websites, and Business Cards
RICHARD A. DOVE SECRETARY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES & DISCIPLINE 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 614.387.9370 888.664.8345 FAX: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov
More information^^^^ A S S O C I AT I ON
?^}^1 OHIO STATE BAR ^^^^ A S S O C I AT I ON EST I880 OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion 2011-02 December 2, 2011 Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion You have requested the opinion of the Ohio State
More informationOHIO STATE BAR O ASSOCIATION.
OHIO STATE BAR O ASSOCIATION. EST I880 OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion 2013-01 January 25, 2013 Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion You have requested the opinion of the Ohio State Bar Association
More informationOPINION 2011-2 Issued October 7, 2011. Multijurisdictional Practice and Debt Settlement Legal Services
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES & DISCIPLINE 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 RICHARD A. DOVE SECRETARY 614.387.9370 888.664.8345 FAX: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov
More informationNebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 09-04
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 09-04 IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO INCLUDE THE WORDS "THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT" FOR LAW FIRM NEWSLETTERS SENT TO PRESENT CLIENTS, FORMER CLIENTS, AND PERSONS
More informationKentucky Bar Association Ethics Opinion KBA E-408 Issued: July 1999
Kentucky Bar Association Ethics Opinion KBA E-408 Issued: July 1999 Since the adoption of the Rules of Professional Conduct in 1990, the Kentucky Supreme Court has made substantial revisions to the rules
More informationOPINION 2013-2 Issued April 5, 2013. Direct Contact with Prospective Clients: Text Messages
RICHARD A. DOVE SECRETARY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES & DISCIPLINE 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov
More informationOPINION 2016-3 Issued June 3, 2016. Lawyer Participation in Referral Services
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov PAUL M. DE MARCO CHAIR WILLIAM J. NOVAK VICE-
More informationBEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE COMPLAINT
.. Inre: u Complaint against: JONATHAN CHARLES SCHIRG, ESQ. [0086652] I 711 Jupiter Avenue Hilliard, OH 43026 Respondent, u BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE RECEIVED OF THE
More informationAdvisory on the Law of Lawyering in New Hampshire
Advisory on the Law of Lawyering in New Hampshire Advisory No. 25 ETHICS, THE INTERNET AND ATTORNEY MARKETING (PART TWO IN A THREE PART SERIES ON ETHICS AND SOCIAL MEDIA) Attorney Conduct, Liability &
More informationNEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS NO. 14-01
NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS NO. 14-01 MAY AN ATTORNEY PARTICIPATE IN A NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAWYER REFERRAL PROGRAM IN WHICH THE ATTORNEY PAYS A DESIGNATED FEE TO PARTICIPATE? STATEMENT OF FACTS
More informationOPINION 2014-2 Issued August 8, 2014. Imputation of Conflicts in a Part-Time County Prosecutor s Law Firm
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES & DISCIPLINE 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov DAVID E. TSCHANTZ CHAIR
More informationORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION Formal Opinion 2014-1 (Ghostwriting by Contract Lawyers and Out-of-State Lawyers)
ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION Formal Opinion 2014-1 (Ghostwriting by Contract Lawyers and Out-of-State Lawyers) Issue: What ethical issues are raised when (1) a lawyer licensed to practice law only outside
More information83 LAWYER ADVERTISING, SOLICITATION
83 LAWYER ADVERTISING, SOLICITATION AND PUBLICITY Adopted November 18, 1989. Addendum issued July 24, 1993. Introduction The Committee has received a substantial number of inquiries from the bar regarding
More informationLegal Ethics and Advertising in the Social Media Era
Legal Ethics and Advertising in the Social Media Era By Michele Ballard Miller Miller Law Group Prepared in connection with the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel s Lunch & Learn Webinar Series
More informationISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct
ISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct ISBA Advisory Opinions on Professional Conduct are prepared as an educational service to members of the ISBA. While the Opinions express the ISBA interpretation
More informationSTANDARD 3.5 ON ASSISTANCE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS
STANDARD 3.5 ON ASSISTANCE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS STANDARD In appropriate circumstances, a provider may offer pro se litigants assistance or limited representation at various stages of proceedings. COMMENTARY
More informationOpinion #177. Advancing Litigation Costs Through Lines of Credit
Opinion #177. Advancing Litigation Costs Through Lines of Credit Issued by the Professional Ethics Commission Date Issued: December 14, 2001 Facts and Question An attorney has requested an opinion on whether
More informationORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION. Formal Opinion 2011-01 (Collaborative Family Law)
ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION Formal Opinion 2011-01 (Collaborative Family Law) Issue: Can a family lawyer enter into a collaborative law agreement consistent with her ethical duties, notwithstanding the
More informationOPINION NO. 90-04 March 16, 1990
..,, OPINION NO. 90-04 March 16, 1990 FACTS: The inquiring attorney asks about the propriety of mailing to members of the bar and others a professional announcement regarding his election to membership
More informationSOCIAL MEDIA. Featured Expert: Todd C. Scott Vice President of Risk Management. Law Office Technology Series. Minnesota State Bar Association
Law Office Technology Series SOCIAL MEDIA Featured Expert: Todd C. Scott Vice President of Risk Management Minnesota State Bar Association www.mnbar.org Social Media If you are an attorney in practice
More informationOut-Of-State Law Firms In A New York State Of Mind
Out-Of-State Law Firms In A New York State Of Mind Devika Kewalramani and Jordan Greenberger Think twice before opening an office in New York. And both times you think, think about the ethics rules. Devika
More informationAvvo Legal Services and The Rules of Professional Conduct
Avvo Legal Services and The Rules of Professional Conduct Avvo Legal Services are designed to solve a simple yet vexing problem: how to make it easier for consumers and small businesses to get access to
More informationMaryland Judicial Ethics Committee
Maryland Judicial Ethics Committee Published Opinion Unpublished Opinion Unpublished Letter of Advice Judge Must Consider Limitations on Use of Social Networking Sites Issue: What are the restrictions
More informationFINANCIAL ADVISING BY ATTORNEYS. Prepared by Thomas E. Geyer Updated November 1, 2003
BAILEY CAVALIERI LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW One Columbus 10 West Broad Street, Suite 2100 Columbus, Ohio 43215-3422 telephone 614.221.3155 facsimile 614.221.0479 www.baileycavalieri.com FINANCIAL ADVISING BY
More informationOutline of Session 12/2/2013. Social Media & Government Legal and Ethical Issues. Part 1 - Legal Issues More Questions than Answers?
Social Media & Government Legal and Ethical Issues Indiana Legal & Ethics Conference December 4, 2013 Presented by: Julie A. Tappendorf Ancel Glink, Chicago Outline of Session Part 1 Legal Issues with
More informationHot Ethics Issues for Product Liability Defense Attorneys
Hot Ethics Issues for Product Liability Defense Attorneys Dane S. Ciolino Loyola University New Orleans College of Law 6363 Saint Charles Ave New Orleans, LA 70118 (504) 861-5652 dciolino@loyno.edu Return
More informationNEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS No. 13-03
NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS No. 13-03 A SALE OF A LAW PRACTICE BY A LAWYER OR LAW FIRM TO AN EXISTING ASSOCIATE EMPLOYEE OR OWNER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SALE FOR PURPOSES OF NEB. CT. R.
More informationNebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 07-01
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 07-01 AN ONLINE MARKETING SERVICES AGREEMENT WHICH PROVIDES FOR AN UP FRONT FEE FOR EXCLUSIVE REFERRALS AND AN ADDITIONAL FEE BASED ON THE NET RECOVERY
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON CLIENT PROTECTION SECTION OF FAMILY LAW NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BAR COUNSEL STATE BAR OF NEW MEXICO VIRGINIA STATE BAR WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING
More informationADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE ON ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. Appointed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey
-- N.J.L.J. -- (--, 2010) Issued by the ACPE and CAA March 25, 2010 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE ON ATTORNEY ADVERTISING Appointed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey JOINT OPINION
More informationOvercoming Ethical Challenges for Multi-Firm Lawyers and Their Firms: Fiduciary Duty, Conflict, Fee-Splitting and More
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Overcoming Ethical Challenges for Multi-Firm Lawyers and Their Firms: Fiduciary Duty, Conflict, Fee-Splitting and More TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2014
More informationCan a lawyer licensed in
ATTORNEY ETHICS Opinion No. 1 of 2012 Query Can a lawyer licensed in Indiana use group coupon or daily deal marketing in compliance with Indiana s Rules of Professional Conduct? Analysis The Indiana State
More informationGrievances Against Lawyers & Judges
Where do I file a grievance against a lawyer or judge THE COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Grievances An ethics grievance against a lawyer or a judge must be in writing and filed with one of the following
More informationThe New Iowa Advertising Rules: A Comparative Look
Richard P. Clem Continuing Legal Education www.richardclem.com The New Iowa Advertising Rules: A Comparative Look On April 15, 2011, the Iowa Supreme Court appointed a committee to propose amendments to
More informationNEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS NO 12-09. Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the
NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS NO 12-09 Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client s interests, including surrendering
More informationSUMMARY OF NEW LAWYER ADVERTISING RULES EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2013
The Supreme Court of Florida has issued new lawyer advertising rules, which will be effective at 12:01 a.m. on May 1, 2013. In re: Amendments to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar - Subchapter 4-7, Lawyer
More informationCOMMITTEE ON ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. Appointed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey
-- N.J.L.J. -- (July --, 2011) Issued by CAA June 28, 2011 COMMITTEE ON ATTORNEY ADVERTISING Appointed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey OPINION 43 Committee on Attorney Advertising Internet Advertising,
More informationDiscuss the importance of professionalism in client development.
MENTORMATCH PROGRAM WORKSHEET BB INTRODUCTION TO CLIENT DEVELOPMENT Worksheet BB is intended to facilitate a discussion about methods of client development that have been successful for the mentor and
More informationKENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-429 Date: June 17, 2008
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-429 Date: June 17, 2008 Since the adoption of the Rules of Professional Conduct in 1990, the Kentucky Supreme Court has adopted various amendments, and made
More informationINFORMAL OPINION 2014-06 WHEN CLIENT CONSENT IS NECESSARY IN LIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION OF CHAPTER 7 BANKRUPTCY DEBTOR
30 Bank Street PO Box 350 New Britain CT 06050-0350 06051 for 30 Bank Street Professional Ethics Committee P: (860) 223-4400 F: (860) 223-4488 INFORMAL OPINION 2014-06 WHEN CLIENT CONSENT IS NECESSARY
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Formal Opinion 06-441 May 13, 2006 Ethical Obligations of Lawyers Who Represent Indigent Criminal Defendants When Excessive
More informationTHE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONDUCT FORMAL OPINION NO. 2012-186
THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONDUCT FORMAL OPINION NO. 2012-186 ISSUE: DIGEST: AUTHORITIES INTERPRETED: Under what circumstances would an attorney
More informationWhat s the Deal with Daily Deals? An Ethical Dilemma
Social media has become an indispensable part of the daily lives of people all around the world. It helps people stay in contact with friends and family, make new connections, showcase talents, share knowledge
More informationNine Marketing Ideas That Can Be Ethically Implemented
ABA Section of Litigation Joint Committees CLE Seminar, January 19-21, 2012 You're Only Young Once: The Do's and Don'ts of Developing Business as a "Young Lawyer" Nine Marketing Ideas That Can Be Ethically
More informationQuestion 5. After the trial, Attorney sent a $500 gift certificate to Doctor, with a note thanking her for recommending that Peter call him.
Question 5 Attorney mailed a professional announcement to several local physicians, listing his name and address and his area of law practice as personal injury. Doctor received Attorney s announcement
More informationHow To Use Social Media To Help Your Business
Ethics of Social Media Marketing for Law Firms Presented by Paul J. Kazaras, Esq. (Philadelphia Bar Association) Gina F. Rubel, Esq., Moderator (Furia Rubel Communications, Inc. ) Apps. Blogs Chat Rooms
More informationWORLD CONFERENCE OF BAR LEADERS FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2014
THE BUSINESS OF LAW-- ADVERTISING AND PUBLICITY WORLD CONFERENCE OF BAR LEADERS FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2014 THE SYSTEM OF REGULATION 50 states, 50 sets of rules In all but California, conduct rules, which
More informationOPINION 21-12 APPLICABILITY OF RULE 49 TO DISCOVERY SERVICES COMPANIES. Issued January 12, 2012
OPINION 21-12 APPLICABILITY OF RULE 49 TO DISCOVERY SERVICES COMPANIES Issued January 12, 2012 Pursuant to District of Columbia Court of Appeals Rule 49, and specifically its section 49(d)(3)(G), the District
More informationISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion
ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion Opinion No. 14-01 May 2014 Subject: Digest: Client Funds and Property; Fees and Expenses A lawyer may accept payment for earned services and expenses by credit
More informationTHE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS. FORMAL OPINION 2006-3 August 2006
THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS FORMAL OPINION 2006-3 August 2006 TOPICS: Outsourcing Legal Support Services Overseas, Avoiding Aiding a
More informationPENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE PHILADELPHIA BAR ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL GUIDANCE COMMITTEE
PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE Summary PHILADELPHIA BAR ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL GUIDANCE COMMITTEE JOINT FORMAL OPINION 2015-100 PROVIDING ADVICE TO
More informationHow Far is Too Far: Ethical Issues in Attorney Advertising and Solicitation. By Lynda J. Grant 1
How Far is Too Far: Ethical Issues in Attorney Advertising and Solicitation By Lynda J. Grant 1 As private attorneys general, plaintiffs class action attorneys work on split second timing. They may have
More informationSTATE BAR OF NEVADA STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY. Formal Opinion No. 7 October 15, 1987
STATE BAR OF NEVADA STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Formal Opinion No. 7 October 15, 1987 QUESTION - May a lawyer mail solicitation letters regarding the following: (1) To
More informationTHE 1999 AMENDMENTS TO THE ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN NEW YORK S CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
THE 1999 AMENDMENTS TO THE ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN NEW YORK S CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Roy Simon* I. INTRODUCTION It is an honor to be on a program named for a lawyer who is so beloved and
More informationInterpretive Comments. Part 7: Information About Legal Services
Interpretive Comments Part 7: Information About Legal Services To assist lawyers advertising in the public media or soliciting prospective clients by written communications, the Advertising Review Committee
More informationSOCIAL MEDIA AND LAW FIRM MARKETING: A REVIEW OF ETHICS GUIDANCE OPINIONS
SOCIAL MEDIA AND LAW FIRM MARKETING: A REVIEW OF ETHICS GUIDANCE OPINIONS Presented by the American Bar Association Law Practice Division and Center for Professional Development American Bar Association
More informationFORMAL OPINION NO. 2007-180 Internet Advertising: Payment of Referral Fees
FORMAL OPINION NO. 2007-180 Internet Advertising: Payment of Referral Fees Facts: Lawyer wants to participate in a nationwide Internet-based lawyer referral service and has received solicitations from
More informationNEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS. No. 12-03
NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS No. 12-03 A Nebraska Attorney May Advertise for Services via Web-Based Services Where the Web Provider Shares in the Fee for Services Provided the Advertising
More informationCITE AS: 2001 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 2 http://stlr.stanford.edu/stlr/articles/01_stlr_2 INTRODUCTION
Hanging a Shingle on the Information Superhighway Legal Advice on the Internet and the Problems of Prohibited Client Solicitation and Unintended Attorney-Client Relationships DARREN FRANKLIN * CITE AS:
More informationAdvisory Opinion #11-07108-A Print Advertisement Soliciting Plaintiffs Injured by Medical Device
STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE Advisory Opinion #11-07108-A Print Advertisement Soliciting Plaintiffs Injured by Medical Device Pursuant to Practice Book 2-28B, the undersigned, duly-appointed reviewing
More information127 USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA FOR
127 USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA FOR INVESTIGATIVE PURPOSES Adopted September 2015 Introduction As various forms of social media have become commonplace, lawyers increasingly utilize social media and social networks
More informationSocial Media Friend or Foe?
12 Maryland Bar Journal March 2011 Social Media Friend or Foe? By Linda D. Schwartz Web 2.0 is a term used to describe Internet communications through interactive commentary or written discussions between
More informationProfessor Sara Anne Hook, M.B.A. J.D. Institute for Paralegal Education August 25, 2014 (audio webinar)
Professor Sara Anne Hook, M.B.A. J.D. Institute for Paralegal Education August 25, 2014 (audio webinar) NAIA Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibility Canon 1: A paralegal must not perform any of
More informationSpecifically, the Bar has been asked the following questions:
ETHICS OPINION NUMBER 222 OF THE MISSISSIPPI BAR RENDERED NOVEMBER 17, 1994 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS; AGREEMENTS AFFECTING LAWYER LIABILITY; RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTNER OR SUPERVISOR
More informationVirtual Law Offices: A New and Lasting Frontier? By Devika Kewalramani 07-18-2012
Virtual Law Offices: A New and Lasting Frontier? By Devika Kewalramani 07-18-2012 The lawyering landscape is changing dramatically with the advent of the virtual law office (VLO): a secure Internet portal
More information~ thej~ Cowdo/r~kMa thej~ Cowd[!/J~ ffl the
VIRGINIA: ~ thej~ Cowdo/r~kMa thej~ Cowd[!/J~ ffl the Citjj o/~on Monday the 15th day 0/ April, 2013. On November 7, 2011, March 29, 2012 and December 4, 2012 came the Virginia State Bar, by George Warren
More informationINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Dave Jackson, Esq. From: Michael Mayes Date: November 10, 2013 Re: Settlement Conference and Representative Information, Case No. 13-123.004 ASSIGNMENT Review the authorities
More informationISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct
ISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct ISBA Advisory Opinions on Professional Conduct are prepared as an educational service to members of the ISBA. While the Opinions express the ISBA interpretation
More informationLAWYERS AS CONTRACTORS HOW MUCH CAN YOU CHARGE FOR THAT?
LAWYERS AS CONTRACTORS HOW MUCH CAN YOU CHARGE FOR THAT? KRISTEN BRAUCHLE Brockman, Brauchle & Evans, PLLC 2020 Southwest Freeway, Ste 323 Houston, Texas 77098 kbrauchle@bbelawfirm.com 713-224-6100 State
More informationRECOMMENDATION. RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association adopts the Model Court Rule on Insurance Disclosure, dated August 2004.
Amended 08 RECOMMENDATION 2 RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association adopts the Model Court Rule on Insurance Disclosure, dated August 2004. Model Court Rule on Insurance Disclosure August 2004 2 3
More informationPresentation to the Bankruptcy Section of the Minnesota State Bar Association
Chapter 7 Trustees Ethical Considerations David P. Leibowitz Lakelaw 420 W. Clayton Street Waukegan, IL 60085 847 249 9100 dleibowitz@lakelaw.com Presentation to the Bankruptcy Section of the Minnesota
More informationRegulation of Lawyer Advertising Proposed Changes to the S.C. Rules of Professional Conduct
Regulation of Lawyer Advertising Proposed Changes to the S.C. Rules of Professional Conduct RULE 1.0 DEFINITIONS (additions) a) Advertise: To disseminate an advertisement or cause an advertisement to be
More informationAttorney Advertising, Solicitation, and Professional Notices
Attorney Advertising, Solicitation, and Professional Notices The following questions and answers are designed to assist the Bar in identifying issues and relevant disciplinary rules pertaining to attorney
More informationNovember 29, 2000 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
Page 1 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Formal Opinion 00-420 Surcharge to Client for Use of a Contract Lawyer November 29, 2000 When costs associated
More informationAdvertising, Part 2: Practice
December 2007 Multnomah Lawyer Ethics Focus Advertising, Part 2: Practice By Mark J. Fucile Fucile & Reising LLP Last month, we looked at the theory underlying law firm marketing in the form of the United
More information(3) (a) whether an attorney/executor or trustee may retain his law firm as attorney for a trust or estate for which he is serving as fiduciary;
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1515 ATTORNEY DRAFTING INSTRUMENT WHICH NAMES SELF EITHER AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OR TRUSTEE OR WHICH DIRECTS SUCH OTHER DESIGNEE TO EMPLOY ATTORNEY AS FIDUCIARY ADMINISTRATOR.
More informationFrom PLI s Course Handbook Information Technology Law Institute 2009 #19051 THE ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF BLOGGING. David A. Lewis Proskauer Rose LLP
From PLI s Course Handbook Information Technology Law Institute 2009 #19051 11 THE ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF BLOGGING David A. Lewis Proskauer Rose LLP The Ethical Considerations of Blogging 1. The Use
More informationLAWYER-NONLAWYER BUSINESS VENTURES: A LIMITED AFFAIR. By: Devika Kewalramani
LAWYER-NONLAWYER BUSINESS VENTURES: A LIMITED AFFAIR By: Devika Kewalramani The practice of law is a profession, not a business. One practical application of this tenet is that the New York Rules of Professional
More informationWISCONSIN SUPREME COURT RULES ON ADVERTISING
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT RULES ON ADVERTISING INFORMATION ABOUT LEGAL SERVICES SCR 20:7.1 Communications concerning a lawyer's services A lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about
More informationAdvisory Opinion #12-01871-A Mailing to Prospective Clients In Serious Injury Case Rule 7.1 Misleading Statements
STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE Advisory Opinion #12-01871-A Mailing to Prospective Clients In Serious Injury Case Rule 7.1 Misleading Statements Pursuantto Practice Book 2-28B, the undersigned, duly-appointed
More informationCOMMITTEE ON THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW. Appointed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey
-- N.J.L.J. --- (March -, 2013) Issued by UPLC March 12, 2013 COMMITTEE ON THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW Appointed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey OPINION 50 A Nonlawyer Who Holds a Power of Attorney
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2014 UT 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH In the Matter of the Discipline of JERE B. RENEER, JERE B. RENEER,
More informationComment, A STATE SURVEY DUAL REPRESENTATION IN ADOPTION
\\jciprod01\productn\m\mat\27-2\mat207.txt unknown Seq: 1 29-JUL-15 10:30 Vol. 27, 2015 Dual Representation in Adoption 481 Comment, A STATE SURVEY DUAL REPRESENTATION IN ADOPTION Dual representation is
More informationAdvisory Opinion #12-01870-A Mailing to Prospective Clients In Wrongful Death Action Rule 7.1 Misleading Statements
STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE Advisory Opinion #12-01870-A Mailing to Prospective Clients In Wrongful Death Action Rule 7.1 Misleading Statements Pursuant to Practice Book 2-28B, the undersigned, duly-appointed
More informationMCLE ON THE WEB. Netiquette Versus Cyber Ethics
cbjmcle46 4/7/05 3:34 PM Page 1 MCLE ON THE WEB ($20 PER CREDIT HOUR) TEST # 46 1 HOUR CREDIT LEGAL ETHICS To earn one hour of MCLE credit, read the substantive material, then download the test, answer
More informationHow To Know If A Prosecutor Can Contact A Victim In A Criminal Case
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 09-03 IF THE VICTIM IN A CRIMINAL CASE THAT A COUNTY ATTORNEY IS PROSECUTING HAS RETAINED COUNSEL TO REPRESENT HIM IN A CIVIL CASE ARISING FROM THE SAME
More informationComparison of Newly Adopted Rhode Island Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules RHODE ISLAND
Comparison of Newly Adopted Rhode Island Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules RHODE ISLAND Preamble Scope Rule 1.0 Rule 1.1 Rule 1.2 Rule 1.3 Rule 1.4 Rule 1.5 Rule 1.6 Rule 1.7 Rule 1.8
More informationLegal Ethics and Fair Debt Collection Litigation
Legal Ethics and Fair Debt Collection Litigation Daniel S. Blinn Consumer Law Group LLC-Rocky Hill, CT Some of these slides are based on a prior presentation by Daniel Blinn and Brian Bromberg. Topics:
More informationSTATEMENT OF STANDARDS AND RULES
STATEMENT OF STANDARDS AND RULES A Public Service of the Nebraska State Bar Association Nebraska State Bar Association FIND-A-LAWYER Program October 8, 2015 STATEMENT OF STANDARDS AND RULES ARTICLE ONE
More informationNew York County Lawyers Association Professional Ethics Committee. Formal Opinion 748. March 10, 2015
New York County Lawyers Association Professional Ethics Committee Formal Opinion 748 March 10, 2015 TOPIC: The ethical implications of attorney profiles on LinkedIn DIGEST: Attorneys may maintain profiles
More informationDELAWARE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS. Opinion 2008-2. February 29, 2008
DELAWARE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Opinion 2008-2 February 29, 2008 This opinion is merely advisory and is not binding on the inquiring attorney or the Court or any other tribunal
More informationTHE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education. Estate Planning for the Family Business Owner
91 THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education Estate Planning for the Family Business Owner Cosponsored by the ABA Section of Real Property, Trust and Estate Law and the ABA Section of Taxation
More informationISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion
ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion Opinion No. 14-03 May 2014 Subject: Digest: Ref.: Conflict of Interest; Professional Independence of Lawyer; Unauthorized Practice of Law; Sharing Fees with Non-Lawyers
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN STEVEN OLSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 12-C-1126 BEMIS COMPANY, INC. et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
More informationNebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 73-7
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 73-7 THE PUBLIC RELATIONS COMMITTEE OF THE BAR MAY APPOINT LOCAL OR REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVES TO ASSIST IN OBTAINING PUBLICITY CONCERNING BAR ASSOCIATION
More informationCAN YOU PUT AN INDEPENDENT FACT WITNESS UNDER A CONTRACT THAT PROVIDES THAT HE OR SHE WILL NOT TALK TO OPPOSING COUNSEL VOLUNTARILY?
CAN YOU PUT AN INDEPENDENT FACT WITNESS UNDER A CONTRACT THAT PROVIDES THAT HE OR SHE WILL NOT TALK TO OPPOSING COUNSEL VOLUNTARILY? 1 I. Introduction by Charles L. Gholz 2 and Bryan J. Byerly 3 This article
More informationETHICS OPINION 011114
ETHICS OPINION 011114 FACTS: A provider law firm for a pre-paid legal services business requests the Ethics Committee review two of their marketing mailings as well as the propriety of the firm sharing
More information