Chapter 3 Multi-pillar System and Underlying Principles

Transcription

1 Retirement Protection Forging Ahead Chapter 3 Multi-pillar System and Underlying Principles World Bank s Multi-pillar model 3.1 In face of the challenges brought by an ageing population, many places around the world have made dedicated efforts to reform their retirement protection systems to enhance sustainability. To help these places conduct systematic analyses and comparisons, the World Bank proposed a threepillar retirement protection framework in 1994 and refined it in 2005 by proposing a more detailed classification of five pillars (see Diagram 3.1): Diagram 3.1 World Bank s multi-pillar model Public services, family support and personal assets contributions or savings to occupational or private pension plans Privately-managed mandatory occupational or private contributory pension plans Publicly-managed mandatory contributory plans Publicly-funded pension or social security schemes Non-contributory zero pillar first pillar second pillar third pillar fourth pillar Source: World Bank According to the World Bank, the core objectives of pension systems are to protect people against the risk of poverty in old age and to maintain a corresponding pre-retirement living standard through savings. The World Bank considers that accumulating enough reserves for retirement is a complex issue. Therefore, we have to adopt a multi-pronged approach and establish multiple sources of savings or income for retirement. As each pillar has its own purposes, target groups and financial sources, a multi-pillar model can better serve the needs of different elderly groups and enable the pension systems to cope with economic, population and political risks.

2 3.3 Although the World Bank advocates the multi-pillar model, it does not indicate that a comprehensive retirement protection system should comprise all five pillars. On the contrary, the World Bank stresses that there is no single system that is suitable for all places. Each place should find its way forward in the light of its inherited retirement protection system, the need for reform and whether the conditions are favourable for reform. Retirement protection currently in Hong Kong 3.4 Based on the multi-pillar model advocated by the World Bank, the retirement protection system in Hong Kong is made up of a number of schemes. It comprises four pillars that are complementary to one another in serving the needs of different groups of elderly (see Diagram 3.2): The zero pillar publicly-funded social security schemes; The second pillar mandatory contributions to the MPF schemes, as well as other occupation-based retirement schemes; The third pillar The fourth pillar voluntary contributions to the MPF schemes, retirement savings-related insurance, etc; and public housing, healthcare and welfare services, family support and personal assets (e.g. self-owned properties). As Hong Kong does not have any publicly-managed mandatory contributory plans, there are no arrangements under the first pillar. Diagram 3.2 Multi-pillar system in Hong Kong Zero pillar First pillar Second pillar Third pillar Fourth pillar Five pillars of the World Bank Publicly-funded pension or social security schemes (non-meanstested or meanstested) Publicly-managed mandatory contributory plans (largely financed on a pay-as-yougo (PAYG) basis) Privately-managed mandatory occupational or private contributory pension plans contributions or savings to occupational or private pension plans Public services, family support and personal assets Retirement protection system in Hong Kong CSSA*; OALA; OAA; Guangdong Scheme; DA Nil contributions to MPF schemes; occupational retirement schemes; civil service pensions; Grant/Subsidised Schools Provident Funds contributions to MPF schemes; retirement savings-related insurance Public housing; public healthcare; residential and community care services; elderly health care vouchers; public transport fare concessions; family support; self-owned properties Note: (*) Including the Portable CSSA Scheme. Source: World Bank and relevant policy bureaux 14

3 Enhancing existing system our intended objectives 3.5 The retirement protection system in Hong Kong advocates that those who have the ability to work should be self-reliant, and the Government s role is to provide assistance for the elderly who cannot financially support themselves. In other words, the working population save and plan for their and their families retirement life through mandatory contributions to MPF schemes, voluntary savings, retirement investments, etc (i.e. the second, third and fourth pillars). The Government, on the other hand, makes use of tax receipts to redistribute wealth through providing a social safety net or a supplement for the needy elderly through social security schemes (i.e. the zero pillar), and heavily subsidising services like public housing, healthcare and residential and community care etc. to meet the daily needs of the elderly (i.e. the fourth pillar). This arrangement can better ensure the long-term sustainability of the system in the light of the ageing population and the need to maintain a simple tax regime with low tax rates. 3.6 The CoP considers that Hong Kong should continue to adopt the multi-pillar model in providing diversified sources to deliver retirement savings and income, to be complemented by a range of public services. To realise the established philosophy behind our social welfare and public finance management policies, the CoP is of the view that the following inherited values and principles treasured by our community should be preserved in the retirement protection system of Hong Kong: (c) Realising self-reliance through continuous employment and savings; Encouraging mutual support among family members; and Providing a social safety net for elderly people in need 3.7 Our target is to establish a comprehensive, adequate, sustainable, affordable and robust retirement protection system, enabling in particular those elderly people who are unable to take care of themselves to maintain a reasonable standard of living. Comprehensive means that apart from income protection, support services in areas such as housing, healthcare and welfare should also be provided under the system. Adequate refers to the adequacy of income protection in supporting the elderly people in their twilight years. Sustainable means the financial sustainability of the system. Affordable means whether the additional expenditure will go beyond the affordability of the Government, employers and employees. Robust means the ability of the system to withstand economic fluctuations without the need for drastic reduction in pension benefits in face of economic instability. These five objectives can co-exist but interact with one another. For example, too much emphasis on adequacy will make the system difficult to sustain, while pursuing sustainability only may result in inadequate protection for the elderly. The CoP considers that the challenge before us is to identify the right balance among these objectives that best suits Hong Kong s practical circumstances. Groups requiring our attention 3.8 Assuming that there is an employee who earns $15,000 per month (same as the median income of employed persons in 2014) starting to make contributions to the MPF at the age of 25. During his/her working life, there is no real wage growth, and the accumulated MPF benefits have not been subject to the offsetting arrangement 1. This employee can accumulate a sum of MPF accrued benefits that can be converted into a monthly income of some $3,000 - $4,000 (at 2015 price) 2 when retiring at 65. Together with the non-means-tested OAA of $1,235 per month, the monthly income should be able to meet his/her daily living expenses (excluding housing and healthcare expenses). While it is difficult to have an objective standard for adequate, we may consider that the level of $3,000 or so is largely adequate as the payments proposed by various regardless of rich or poor proposals covered in the Report are around this level. 15

4 3.9 For working age people engaged in lower-income jobs, those whose MPF benefits have been used for offsetting, home-makers or those without a permanent job, the amount of MPF benefits they can accumulate is limited. If the protection offered by the other pillars is inadequate, such people may resort to the means-tested CSSA or OALA After examining the elderly poverty situation and the profile of elderly people that can be covered by each pillar under the existing retirement protection system, the CoP considers that the following groups deserve our attention: (c) (d) The elderly people who are still living below the poverty line and have financial needs after policy intervention. Based on the 2014 poverty statistics, this included non-cssa elderly people who were below the poverty line and claimed to have financial needs. Among them, or so were receiving the OALA. Some features of the MPF such as its current contribution rates and the maximum and minimum levels of income for MPF contributions have made it difficult for this pillar to meet all retirement needs. Besides, as the system has been implemented for only 15 years, low-income earners can only accumulate relatively less savings upon retirement. This is especially the case for those employees who need not make contributions due to their low income and those who are affected by the offsetting arrangement. In 2014, employees were affected by the offsetting arrangement, representing 1.7% of the employees who have enrolled in MPF schemes. The non-working population, for instance there are about home-makers in Hong Kong currently. Most of them are housewives who can only rely on private savings, family support or financial assistance provided by social security to support their living in their old age. There are elderly people who are not rich but have some assets (such as self-owned properties). As they don t know how long they will live and are worried about outliving their own savings, they will reduce their daily expenses as much as possible ending up in a frugal life in their old age. At present, there are about elderly people residing in self-owned properties with no mortgage (including private properties and Home Ownership Scheme (HOS) flats) The CoP suggests that the community may focus on exploring ways to improve the retirement protection arrangements for the above four groups of people. However, as mentioned in paragraph 3.7, apart from being comprehensive and adequate, a retirement protection system should also be sustainable and affordable. Maintaining the right balance among these objectives is one of the issues being looked into when carrying out reforms on pension schemes in some overseas countries or places. 1 This example has been cited by the Provident Fund Schemes Authority (MPFA). No real wage growth means that this wage is only adjusted in line with inflation without increase in real terms. Offsetting is an arrangement that allows employers to use funds which include the MPF accrued benefits to offset severance payments or long service payments required under the Employment Ordinance. 2 Other assumptions in this example include the annualised internal rate of return of 1.6% (i.e. the annualised internal rate of return between the MPF inception and October 2015) during a 40-year working life; taking into acount of the rate of inflation in the corresponding period; the MPF benefits withdrawn upon retirement to earn a rate of return on par with inflation; and the MPF accumulated benefits to be divided into installments of same amount over the average expected life expectancies at 65. For details please refer to the example in paragraph

5 Overseas experience 3.12 Annex 2 reviews the trends in some overseas places in reforming their retirement protection systems. There are two main observations In the past many places have developed publicly-managed mandatory contributory systems under the first pillar which is financed mainly on a PAYG basis. However, against the backdrop of declining birth rates and longer life expectancies, when the number of retirees has grown faster than that of the working population, the first pillar in these places has experienced financial difficulties. One of the reform directions is to retain this pillar and fix its problems. Measures such as deferring the retirement age, revising the formula for calculating pension entitlements, etc have been implemented to reduce pension expenditure or contain its rate of increase to improve the financial sustainability of the first pillar. Another reform direction is that more and more places have established the second pillars, mainly being privately-managed mandatory occupational contributory systems operated in the form of individual accounts. As these second pillars are fully funded, the pension schemes have accumulated adequate assets to meet current and future payment obligations. Hence such systems are more financially sustainable. However, same as the MPF in Hong Kong, the second pillars in these places have encountered challenges, including fee levels, inadequate protection, as well as the investment and longevity risk borne by employees. These places, thus, have implemented improvement measures, such as introducing default pension products, to lower fees and better manage investment risks. 17