Utah Sentencing and Release Guidelines

Transcription

1 ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form, or has it changed substantially or been abolished? In 1983 the Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice was created and its statutory mandate included the task of developing and evaluating sentencing and release Guidelines. 1 The Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice continued to manage the Guidelines until 1993 when the Utah Sentencing Commission was established. 2 The Utah Sentencing Commission presently manages the Guidelines. Since its establishment eight additional positions on the Commission have been added, most of which are directed at addressing concerns with juvenile sentencing. 3 Membership: who appoints them, for what terms, with what required qualifications? The Utah Sentencing Commission is composed of 27 members who are appointed through the following processes: The Speaker of the House appoints: two members of the House of Representatives who are not of the same political party. The President of the Senate appoints: two members of the Senate who are not of the same political party. The Chair of Judicial Council appoints: two trial court judges. two juvenile court judges. one appellate court judge. The Utah Bar Commission appoints: one private practice attorney who is experienced in criminal law and is a member of the Utah State Bar. one attorney who is experienced in the defense of minors in juvenile court and is a member of the Utah State Bar. The Statewide Association of Public Attorneys appoints: one criminal prosecutor. one juvenile court prosecutor. The Governor appoints: one representative of the Utah Sheriff s Association. one Chief of Police. one licensed professional who assists in the rehabilitation of adult offenders. one licensed professional who assists in the rehabilitation of juvenile offenders. two members from the public who exhibit sensitivity to the concerns of victims of crime and to the ethnic composition of the population. one member from the public at large. The following seven positions may be occupied by the individual holding the title or a designee chosen by the holder of that title: Executive Director of the Department of Corrections Director of the Division of Juvenile Justice Services Executive Director of the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice Chair of the Board of Pardons and Parole Chair of the Youth Parole Authority Director of Salt Lake Legal Defenders Attorney General Utah Laws ch. 302, Utah Laws ch. 77, 1; Utah Code 63M (2014). 3 Compare 1993 Utah Laws ch. 77, 1 (the enacting statute which created 19 positions on the commission), with Utah Code 63M (the current statute which has 27 positions on the commission). 4 Utah Code 63M (2014). 1

2 Is the commission an independent agency, or is it located in or hosted by some other state agency? of sentencing judges while preserving the role of the Board of Pardons and Parole and the Youth Parole Authority. 7 The Sentencing Commission is a subpart of the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ). The CCJJ is Utah s primary organization for coordinating between various branches and levels of government regarding criminal and juvenile justice issues. For example, the CCJJ distributes grants related to criminal justice, assists in out-of-state felony fugitive extraditions, and provides ongoing research assistance to the Sentencing Commission, Utah Board of Juvenile Justice, Utah Substance Abuse Advisory Council, and the Office of Domestic and Sexual Violence. Although the Sentencing Commission shares resources with the CCJJ, the Sentencing Commission submits reports directly to the legislature, courts and governor. Additionally, the two commissions are to [coordinate] on criminal and juvenile justice issues... 5 How many staff does the Commission have? Are they dedicated to the Commission, or shared with another agency? The Sentencing Commission presently has a dedicated staff of three. In addition, it receives administrative and financial support from the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice. 6 What is the Commission s current statutory mandate? The mandated responsibilities of the Sentencing Commission are to develop Guidelines and provide recommendations that achieve the following: (1) respond to public comment; (2) relate sentencing practices and correctional resources; (3) increase equity in criminal sentencing; (4) better define responsibility in criminal sentencing; (5) and enhance the discretion Do statutes and/or guidelines identify management of prison and jail resources as a goal? The enabling statute declares that Sentencing Guidelines and recommendations are to relate sentencing practices and correctional resources. 8 Also, the most recently published Guidelines indicate that prison resources are severely overtaxed and that the Guidelines are aimed at assist[ing] decision makers in the appropriate allocation of these resources. 9 Finally, the Commission has released a policy statement indicating its sensitivity to the scarcity of available sanctioning resources. 10 Are sentencing practices studied by means of annual or other regular data sets? If so, are those data sets made available to outside researchers? The Commission primarily utilizes existing data sets that were compiled by other criminal justice agencies (e.g., Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice). There are no regularly published data sets made available for outside research by the Sentencing Commission. 11 ll2. THE GUIDELINES When were the guidelines first implemented? The first Guidelines were published in 1979 as a joint effort by the Department of Corrections, various Utah Courts, and the Board of Pardon and Paroles. 12 The first commission-drafted guidelines were published in Utah Code 63M-7-405(3) (2014); Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice, Annual Report, at 1 4 (2013). 6 Utah Sentencing Commission Contact Page, sentencing_contact.html (last visited Aug. 17, 2014); Utah Code 63M (2014). 7 Utah Code 63M (2014). 8 Utah Code 63M-7-404(2) (2014). 9 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 2 (2014). 10 Utah Sentencing Commission Adult Sentencing and Release Determinations: Philosophical Approach at 2 (2013). 11 Utah Code 63-M-7-405(2) (2014). 12 Richard J. Oldroyd, Utah s Conjoint Guidelines for Sentencing and Parole, Overcrowded Times: Solving the Prison Problem, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1, 8-10 (Feb. 1994). 13 See National Conference of State Legislatures, Sentencing and Corrections State Profiles (2009), available at pdf; National Association of Sentencing Commissions, Sentencing Commission News, May 1998, at 7, available at 2

3 In recent years have they been modified at least once a year? The Commission provides annual updates to the adult Sentencing Guidelines. Do the commission s recommended initial or modified guidelines require affirmative legislative approval, or do they take effect subject to legislative override? The Commission is required to submit recommendations for Sentencing Guidelines and amendments to the legislature, courts, and governor at least 60 days prior to the annual general session of the legislature, but the statute is silent as to when or how any proposed amendments take effect. 14 The courts have stated that the Guidelines do not have the force and effect of law. 15 Do the sentencing guidelines only apply to felonies, or are some misdemeanors and other lesser offenses also covered? Are some felonies excluded (e.g., those subject to life and/or death penalty)? With the exception of class A misdemeanor sex offenses, the Guidelines deal solely with felonies. 16 The only crime in Utah punishable by death aggravated murder is excluded from the Guidelines. 17 Is a grid used? Are there multiple grids? How many severity levels does the grid contain? The Utah Sentencing Guidelines are presented in grid format. There are two grids 18 that cover the majority of felony level offenses: a Sexual Offense Matrix that focuses exclusively on sexual offenses and a General Offense Matrix that covers the remaining felony categories. The Sex Offender Matrix has ten levels of offense severity, including a column for class A misdemeanor sexual offenses. The General Offense Matrix has twelve levels of offense severity. 19 How is the presumptive sentence determined? The presumptive sentence in months is determined by finding the cell that is the intersection between the offender s criminal history score and the severity level of the present offense. On both the Sex Offender Matrix and the General Matrix, the horizontal axis contains various offense categories that are predominantly arranged from the most severe to the least severe, with the exceptions of columns E and F. 20 On the vertical axis of both matrices is a listing of the criminal history categories, which are ordered from the most extensive criminal history to minimal or no criminal history. The General Matrix has five possible levels of criminal history and the Sex Offender Matrix has three possible levels of criminal history. It is important to note that neither matrix presents sentence duration ranges. Instead, the duration in each cell represent the typical length of stay if the offender is imprisoned Utah Code 63M-7-405(2) (2014). 15 Preece v. House, 886 P.2d 508, 511 (Utah 1994) (citing Larbrum v. Utah State Bd. Of Pardons, 870 P.2d 902 (Utah 1993)). 16 The guidelines do not expressly state that class A misdemeanor sex offenses are the only misdemeanors for which the guidelines are applicable, however, they are the only misdemeanor offenses listed on the sentencing grids or discussed in the policy section. See Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at (2014) (providing a list of all offenses covered by the guideline grids and ranking them in order of severity); Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 3 (advocating for presentence investigations on all felony convictions and class A misdemeanor sex offense convictions. ). 17 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 7 (2014); Utah Code (2014). 18 Utah also has an Attempted Aggravated Murder Matrix and a DUI Matrix, however, they are scarcely referenced in the Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines. Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 12 (2014); Utah DUI Sentencing Matrix (2012). 19 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 11, 18 (2014). 20 On the General Matrix, Column E corresponds to 3rd degree Death crimes and Column F corresponds to 1st degree Other crimes. The decision to place 1st degree Other crimes on the less severe end of the spectrum than Death crimes likely reflects the position that Death crimes are viewed as more severe, despite the fact that the recommended sentences for 1st degree Other crimes are longer than those for 3rd degree Death crimes. On the Sex Offender Matrix, Column E corresponds to sex crimes that have a statute mandating a prison disposition and Column F corresponds to the most severe sex crime category that the court has discretion regarding which disposition is imposed. Regardless of whether there is a statutorily mandated prison sentence the guidelines recommend the same sentence lengths (e.g., Column F 5 years to Life recommends to same sentence length as Column D Mandatory Prison 5 to Life ). Therefore, the exceptions of Column E and F likely reflect the position of the state legislator on the severity of certain sex crimes and not necessarily the position of the sentencing commission. Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 11, 18 (2014). 21 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 11, 18 (2014). 3

4 Is the choice among types of sentences regulated by a disposition or other prison in/ out line? Are out sentences accompanied by suspended execution of prison or suspended imposition of sentence? By definitive preclusion of prison for those cases? The General Matrix has four dispositions: mandatory imprisonment, imprisonment, intermediate sanction, and regular probation. The mandatory imprisonment disposition (shaded black) is exclusively for the offense of murder. 22 The imprisonment disposition (shaded dark grey) comprises: (1) the Guidelines recommendation that a prison term be imposed; and (2) the typical length of stay if the offender is sentenced to prison. The intermediate sanction disposition (shaded light gray) is separated from the imprisonment disposition by a jagged-diagonal line, which begins in the top-right of the matrix and cuts across toward the bottom-left of the matrix. For offenders falling in the cells designated as intermediate sanction, the Guidelines recommend probation with special conditions. These special conditions (e.g., electronic monitoring) are directed toward offenders that represent a higher risk to the community than offenders for which regular probation is recommended. The Guidelines also emphasize that [t]here is no bright line between regular probation and intermediate sanctions and that the court should carefully consider the impact on correctional resources before ordering intermediate sanctions. 23 The regular probation disposition (unshaded white) is directed toward the lowest risk offenders. It is separated from the intermediate sanction disposition by a line that runs from the upper-right of the matrix to the bottommiddle. If regular probation or an intermediate sanction is ordered, the Guidelines advise the sentencing judge to use a supplementary form to determine how much jail time should be used as a condition of that probation. This supplementary form is labeled Jail as a Condition of Felony Probation Matrix and contains criminal history and crime severity axes similar to the General Matrix. Both the intermediate sanction and regular probation dispositions recommend a suspended execution of the sentence. 24 The Sex Offender Matrix format is slightly different than the General Matrix. First, the Sex Offender Matrix does not contain a regular probation disposition. It only contains mandatory imprisonment, imprisonment, and intermediate sanctions dispositions. Second, the lines separating the dispositions on the Sex Offender Matrix are more vertical than diagonal. This means that the recommended disposition appears more dependent on the severity of the present offense than the offender s criminal history. 25 Are there border boxes or other case categories permitting multiple sentence types? The General Matrix has four border boxes that are split between the imprisonment and intermediate sanction dispositions. Similarly, the Sex Offender Matrix has two border boxes that are split between the imprisonment and intermediate sanction dispositions. The Guidelines advise the sentencing judge to choose either disposition when an offender s criminal history score and offense severity intersect in a border box. 26 Are the guidelines purely advisory, or are they legally binding? The Guidelines are purely advisory and therefore discretion concerning sentencing remains with the court and the Board and Pardons and Parole. ll3. DEPARTURES AND SIMILAR ADJUST- MENTS TO GENERALLY- RECOM- MENDED SENTENCES What is the overall/general standard for departure? The Sentencing Commission recognizes that there are occasionally circumstances that compel departure, and the Guidelines establish a procedure for documenting departures based upon aggravating or mitigating circumstances. Additionally, the Guidelines strongly encourage decision makers to articulate the deciding factors for a departure on the record. 27 However, because the Guidelines are advisory, the Guidelines do not provide a standard for when a departure might be appropriate. 22 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 7; Utah Code (2) 23 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 10 (2014). 24 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 11, 22 (2014). 25 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 18 (2014). 26 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 1, 17 (2014). 27 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 2, 14 (2014). 4

5 Are there lists of aggravating and mitigating circumstances permitting departure? If so, are such lists non-exclusive? Is there a list of prohibited factors? Both the General and Sex Offender matrices have supplementary forms that provide a non-exhaustive list of aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Neither supplementary form contains a list of prohibited factors. 28 Do the guidelines expressly address mitigations based on a guilty plea, acceptance of responsibility, and/or providing assistance to law enforcement? Assisting law enforcement in the resolution of other crimes and having an attitude that is amenable to supervision are listed as mitigating circumstances on the supplementary form for the General Matrix. The Sex Offender supplementary form lists cooperation with law enforcement as a mitigating factor. Neither form suggests treating a guilty plea as a mitigating factor during sentencing. 29 Are there limits on the degree of durational (length-of-custody) departure? The Guidelines do not provide any suggestions for the degree of durational departure. Are there limits on the availability of dispositional departure (executed-prison vs. stayed sentence)? There are no restrictions on the discretion of the court to depart from a disposition recommended by the Guidelines. Dispositional departures are only restricted if a statute with a mandatory disposition for the present offense exists (e.g., requiring imprisonment for murder). 30 ll4. PRISON RELEASE DISCRETION Does this jurisdiction utilize parole release discretion or has it been abolished for all or most offenders? The Board of Pardons and Parole decides when offenders are released from prison and the conditions they will be subject to upon release. 31 Does the state have a truth in sentencing law, limiting the extent of early release? Utah does not have a truth in sentencing statute. Nonetheless, Utah qualified for federal grant funding (while the grant existed) aimed at promoting truth in sentencing because of its practices, including the use of sentencing Guidelines to guide both sentencing and parole release decisions. 32 Do sentencing guidelines set the minimum time to serve in prison, the maximum, both minimum and maximum, a target/recommended prison duration, or some other combination of these sentence conditions? The Guidelines recommend the disposition whether the offender should be sentenced to prison or probation and the typical duration of any incarceration. When sentencing, the judge will pronounce the disposition. If the judge pronounces a prison disposition, the pronounced length of incarceration will equal the indeterminate range defined in statute (e.g., for a second-degree felony, the law provides for a sentence of 1 to 15 years). 33 The duration on the grid, which falls within the statutory range, represents the typical time served for that offense, and serves as a recommended duration for the Board of Pardons and Parole. The Board of Pardons and Parole will make the final decision regarding the actual length of incarceration Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 14, 20 (2014). 29 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 14, 20 (2014). 30 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 7-8, 14 (2014); Utah Code Utah Const. art. VII, Utah specifically qualified for the grant under a provision for indeterminate sentencing states that required [p]ersons convicted of... violent crime on average serve not less than 85% of the prison term established under the state s sentencing and release guidelines. William J. Sabol et al., The Urban Institute, The Influences of Truth-in-Sentencing Reforms on Changes in States Sentencing Practices and Prison Populations 5, 11, 20, 22 (2002). 33 Utah Code (2014). 34 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 1(2014). 5

6 Is the period of post-prison supervision independent of any unserved prison term? The permissible duration of post-prison supervision is dependent on the amount of remaining time an offender has on his or her indeterminate sentence. Thus, the time an offender served in prison, added with the post-prison supervision period, may not exceed the maximum length of the indeterminate sentence an offender was given. Aside from the indeterminate sentence limitation, the Board of Pardons and Parole has discretion to determine how long an offender will be supervised once that offender is released on parole. 35 The statutory minimum periods of parole are based on the conviction offense, and are three years, ten years, the unexpired length of the sentence, or life. 36 ll5. RELATIONSHIP TO CRIMINAL LAWS Did the guidelines replace some or all previous statutory maxima? No. Felony offenses are classified as either capital or first through third degree offenses, and the minimum and maximum terms of punishment are established by statute. Although the Guidelines may set forth typical terms of imprisonment that are lower than these statutory terms, the Guidelines are advisory, and therefore do not supersede any statutory maximums. 39 Did the guidelines replace some or all mandatory-minimum statutes? What good-time credits do prisoners earn? Is program participation considered? Due to the advisory nature of the Guidelines, no mandatory statutory minimums have been replaced. Utah does not presently have good-time credits or an official program participation option that reduces time served. Additionally, in order for an offender to be eligible for early parole termination, the offender must possess a high school diploma, GED, vocational certificate, or have a valid excuse for failure to obtain one of those documents. 37 Are prison terms subject to exceptional, second-look releasing mechanisms? Are guidelines built on top of (i.e., equal to or more severe than) any remaining mandatory minima, or are they set independently and overridden whenever a mandatory applies? The Guidelines work within the confines of any existing mandatory minimum, providing that [i]n cases where the statutory minimum exceeds the typical length of stay provided in the matrix, the typical length of stay should be ignored. 40 The Board of Pardons and Parole determines how much time an offender should serve in prison beyond the minimum set by the sentence. The Board has guidelines for when an offender may request a first appearance before the Board and begin the parole process, however, it is possible for an offender to request an earlier first appearance if extraordinary circumstances or other compelling reasons exist. Nonetheless, even if an earlier first appearance date is set, parole may not be granted until the offender has served at least the minimum of his or her indeterminate prison sentence. 38 Are some mandatory minima subject to casespecific departure or other exception? Neither the court nor the Board of Pardons and Parole may deviate from statutory minimum sentences. 41 Nonetheless, certain statutes provide judges the option of choosing one of several sentences with different minimums. For example, most of the statutes that apply to grievous sexual offenses have a presumptive sentence of 15 years to life; however, upon finding mitigating evidence, the judge may reduce the sentence to 10 years to life or 6 years to life Padilla v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & Parole, 947 P.2d 664, 669 (Utah 1997) (alteration in original) (explaining that a court must set an indeterminate sentence as provided by statute and that an indeterminate sentence shall continue until the maximum period expires unless the Board, in its discretion, terminates or commutes the punishment or pardons the offender. ); Peterson et al., Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice, Factors Related to Parole Violations and Revocations: Analysis of the Utah Parole System and Outcomes 3, available at 36 Utah Code (2014). 37 Utah Code (5) (2014). 38 Utah Admin. Code r. R See Utah Code (2014) (classifying felonies as capital or first through third degree); (establishing the minimum and maximum sentences for first through third degree felony offenses). 40 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 8 (2014). 41 State v. Bishop, 717 P.2d 261 (Utah 1986). 42 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 16 (2014). 6

7 ll6. CRIMINAL HISTORY SCORING What are the major components of the criminal history score? There are seven elements of a criminal history score for the General Matrix: 1. Prior felony convictions; 2. Prior misdemeanor convictions; 3. Prior juvenile adjudications; 4. Supervision history; 5. Supervision risk; 6. Violence history; 7. Weapons use in current offense. 43 The prior felony convictions element only counts convictions that were sentenced prior to the sentencing of any current offense(s); all present offenses are explicitly excluded. 44 Additionally, if several prior convictions arose out of a single criminal episode, that episode should only be counted as one conviction. 45 The total number of prior felony convictions corresponds to a category, which has a score attached (e.g., one prior felony is scored as two points; more than three prior felonies is scored as eight points). This prior felony score is added with the scores of the elements described below determine which criminal history row the offender falls into on the matrix. Prior misdemeanor convictions are also scored into categories and count a single criminal episode as one conviction. The only traffic offenses included under this category are DUI and reckless driving convictions. 46 Prior juvenile adjudications are counted only if the offense would constitute a crime if committed by an adult (i.e., not a status offense). Further, the prior adjudication must have resulted in a finding of delinquency. When scoring prior juvenile adjudications, three misdemeanors count as one felony. An offender s supervision history includes both juvenile and adult history. The highest scoring categories in this element involve revocations of probation or parole and committing the present offense while under supervision or pre-trial release. Supervision risk tallies the number of times the offender has absconded or escaped from court ordered supervision. Under this element, higher scoring categories are reserved for absconding or escaping from the most restrictive supervisions (e.g., escaping from confinement). It is important to note that absconding does not require a conviction, whereas escape does require a conviction. 47 The violence history element adds criminal history points for prior juvenile adjudications or adult convictions that involved a weapon, physical force, threat of force, or sexual abuse. The weapons use in current offense element is only used when the present charge does not reflect the use of a weapon. This element does not count prior convictions, because prior violence is covered by the violence history element. The different categories corresponding to this element relate to how the weapon was used to aid in the commission of the crime. For example, the category which adds the least amount of points is met if the offender had a weapon nearby during the offense, whereas the category with the most points is met when the weapon was used and injured the victim. 48 The Sexual Offender Matrix includes all of the General Matrix criminal history elements in addition to the following: 1. Number of prior victims 2. Time range The number of prior victims element adds criminal history points if the offender has previously been convicted of sexual offenses against victims other than the victim of the current offense. The time range element adds points for how long the offender has been committing sexual offenses (assigning more points for longer periods), counting from the time of the offender s first sexual offense conviction Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 11 (2014). 44 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 4 (2014). 45 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 4 (2014); Utah Code Ann (2014). 46 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 4 (2014). 47 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 5 (2014). 48 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 6 (2014). 49 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 15 (2014). 7

8 Does the jurisdiction utilize decay /washout rules, that is, do old convictions count less or drop out? Which older convictions decay, when, and how? The Guidelines do not provide instructions to limit the use of an offender s criminal history after a specified period of time. Do the guidelines include any other significant limitations on how criminal history can be used (e.g., limits on eligibility for high-history categories; adjustments for older offenders)? Because the Guidelines use a category system to assign points for each element, once an offender is in the highest-point category, subsequent criminal history within that element will have no effect on the number of points that element contributes to the total criminal history score. For example, the highest-point category in the prior felony convictions element (8 points) is assigned to offenders with three or more prior felonies. Even if an offender has six prior felonies, he or she will still only receive 8 points for the element, because that is the number given to the highest-point category. As a consequence, an offender cannot reach the second highest criminal history category (12-15 points) on the General Matrix solely because of prior felony convictions. Therefore, to reach the highest criminal history score category in the General Matrix, an offender must be assigned points from at least three elements (the highest-point categories of any two elements will be insufficient). In contrast, on the Sex Offender Matrix it is possible for an offender to reach the highest criminal history category (7+ points) solely on prior felony convictions. 50 ll7. MULTIPLE CURRENT OFFENSES Are consecutive sentences limited? If so, how (e.g., prohibited, permissive, or mandatory in certain cases; limits on total duration; use of a multiple-counts enhancement formula)? Judges are given the discretion to decide whether an offender should serve concurrent or consecutive sentences. When making this determination judges are to consider the gravity and circumstances of the offenses, the number of victims, and the history, character, and rehabilitative needs of the defendant. If an offense is committed while an offender is imprisoned or on parole, the sentence for the new offense is presumptively consecutive. In general the total duration of the consecutive sentences imposed may not exceed thirty years. 51 In consecutive sentencing, how is the offender s criminal history taken into account? The criminal history scoring of an offender does not change when imposing multiple sentences. Instead, for the purpose of consecutive sentencing of multiple offenses, the Guidelines advise adding 40% of the length of the shortest sentence to the full length of the longest sentence. If there are more than two offenses, the Guidelines advise taking the longest sentence and adding 40% of all remaining offenses to the full duration of the longest sentence Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 11, 18 (2014). 51 Utah Code (2014). 52 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 8-9 (2014). A smaller recommend enhancement applies when multiple convictions are ordered to run concurrently: 10% of the prison stay recommended for each shorter sentence is added to the recommended term for the longest sentence. Id. at 8. 8

9 ll8. ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS (LOCATION ON THE ADVISORY - TO- MANDATORY CONTINUUM) Are recommended sentences enforced by prosecution and defense sentence appeals? The Guidelines are advisory and both the General and Sex Offender matrices state that the recommendations do not create any right or expectation on behalf of the offender. 53 Although a sentence may be appealed, it cannot be on the basis that it deviated from the recommendation of the Guidelines. 54 Are other enforcement methods used (e.g., required reasons for departure; published judge-specific departure rates; narrow permitted sentencing alternatives and/or ranges)? Are some deviations from the guidelines not deemed departures? The Guidelines consider any sentence different from that prescribed within the offender s intersection box on the matrix as a departure. In boxes that recommend more than one disposition, the court may select either disposition without it being considered a departure. Additionally, the Guidelines do not suggest a presumptive or preferred disposition for boxes with multiple recommendations. 56 Do some deviations require especially strong justification? Or minimal justification? The Guidelines request the same standard for all deviations, which is that the aggravating and mitigating factors prompting the departure must be noted on the record. 57 Although the Guidelines advise judges to state reasons for any departure, judges are not obligated to do so Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 11, 18 (2014). 54 Monson v. Carver, 928 P.2d 1017, 1024 (Utah 1996). 56 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 16 (2014) 57 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 2 (2014). 55 Utah Adult Sentencing and Release Guidelines at 2 (2014). 9