Award of Dispute Resolution Professional. In Person Proceeding Information
|
|
- Emory Fowler
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 In the Matter of the Arbitration between BACK PAIN, P.C. A/S/O JC CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ Proceeding Type: In Person Insurance Claim File No: Claimant Counsel: The Law Office of Jeffrey Randolph, LLC v. Claimant Attorney File No: BCPLI-08 Respondent Counsel: Gutterman, Markowitz & Klinger, L.L.P. Respondent Attorney File No: Accident Date: 07/24/2010 NJ PLIGA RESPONDENT(s). Award of Dispute Resolution Professional Dispute Resolution Professional: Joseph J. Riva, Esq. I, the Dispute Resolution Professional assigned to the above matter, pursuant to the authority granted under the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5, et seq., the Administrative Code regulations, N.J.A.C. 11:3-5 et seq., and the Rules for the Arbitration of No-Fault Disputes in the State of New Jersey of Forthright, having considered the evidence submitted by the parties, hereby render the following Award: Hereinafter, the injured person(s) shall be referred to as: Patient A proceeding was conducted on: 04/05/13 In Person Proceeding Information Claimant or claimant's counsel appeared in person. Respondent or respondent s counsel appeared by telephone. The following amendments and/or stipulations were made by the parties at the hearing: The amount of the reimbursement claim is $3, NJ Page 1 of 7
2 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law This arbitration arises out of an automobile accident that occurred on 07/24/10. On that date, J C (patient) was an insured of NJ PLIGA (respondent) and eligible to receive personal injury protection (PIP) benefits when he suffered injuries because of the accident. Patient received medical care at Back Pain, P.C. (claimant). Claimant took an assignment of patient s claim for PIP benefits. After a dispute arose regarding those benefits, claimant commenced this proceeding, seeking reimbursement from respondent of $3, with interest for unpaid medical expense benefits together with counsel fees and costs. The reimbursement claim is laid out in the post-hearing Arbitration Summary submitted by claimant. The issues identified by the parties, confirmed by counsel at the arbitration hearing held on 04/05/13, and presented for my consideration are: (1) whether claimant improperly billed for the services it provided to patient and (2) whether the services on 02/02/11 were medically necessary. The parties did not present any other issues. They agreed that only the issues presented would be decided. For that reason, I have not considered nor decided any other issues. The parties submitted a number of documents in support of their respective positions for my review, including: Claimant s Demand for Arbitration with attached Exhibits A and B, Claimant s 03/18/13 submission with attached Exhibits A through D, Respondent s Statement of Response, Claimant s 04/19/13 post-hearing submission, Respondent s 05/17/12 submission with attached Exhibits A and B, and Respondent s 06/05/12 submission with attached Exhibit A. I have carefully reviewed all of the parties submissions and considered the arguments of counsel advanced at the hearing. Issues previously raised but not identified at the hearing are deemed abandoned. NCCI edits By way of background, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) developed the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) to promote national correct coding methodologies and to control improper coding leading to inappropriate payment in Part B claims. The coding policies were developed based on coding conventions defined in the American Medical Association s CPT manual, national and local policies and edits, coding guidelines developed by national societies, analysis of standard medical and surgical practices, and a review of current coding practices. The National Correct Coding Initiative Coding Policy Manual for Medicare Services is regularly updated by CMS. The purpose of the NCCI edits is to prevent improper payment when incorrect code combinations are reported. The NCCI contains two tables of edits. The Column One/Column Two Correct Coding Edits NJ Page 2 of 7
3 table and the Mutually Exclusive Edits table include code pairs that should not be reported together for a number of reasons explained in the Coding Policy Manual. The edits are applied to services billed by the same physician for the same patient for the same date of service. The same premise is followed under N.J.A.C. 11:3-29.4(g), which, in pertinent part, states: Artificially separating or partitioning what is inherently one total procedure into subparts that are integral to the whole for the purpose of increasing medical fees is prohibited. Such practice is commonly referred to as unbundling or fragmented billing. Providers and payors shall use the National Correct Coding Initiative Edits, incorporated herein by reference, as updated quarterly by CMS and available at Respondent did not reimburse claimant for massage therapy billed under CPT code when chiropractic services were billed under CPT code Pursuant to the edits, billing of CPT code on the same date as chiropractic services is not separately reimbursable unless the proper modifier is utilized. The NCCI documentation also included examples of the usage of the modifier in CMT/PT situations; Medicare covers chiropractic manipulative treatment (CMT) of five spinal regions. Physical medicine and rehabilitation services described by CPT codes 97112, and are not separately reportable when performed in a spinal region undergoing CMT. If these physical medicine and rehabilitation services are performed in a different region than CMT and the provider is eligible to report physical medicine and rehabilitation codes under the Medicare program, the provider may report CMT and the above codes using modifier 59. Taking the above into account, it is clear that in very limited circumstances, CPT codes and can be billed together; however, the provider must both utilize the modifier 59 and demonstrate that the services in question be provided to different areas of the body. Here, while claimant included the proper modifier 59, the proofs are insufficient to establish that the procedure/service was distinct or independent from the other services performed. Therefore, I conclude that respondent properly denied payment of the services billed under CPT code I find unconvincing the proofs submitted by claimant. Office Visits In Clifford Medical & Rehabilitation a/s/o P.A. v. Allstate New Jersey, NJ (Forthright, Mar. 2, 2012), DRP Maria Daniskas, Esq. held that health care providers are required to utilize modifier -25 to indicate that the patient s condition required significant separately identifiable evaluation and management services on the same date that chiropractic treatment was rendered. The failure of the provider to properly modify the CPT code and justify a separately billable E/M service was fatal to the claim. Relying on this arbitration award, respondent argues that reimbursement for the office visits on 07/27/10, 08/25/10, 09/27/10, 10/06/10, 10/27/10, 11/29/10, 01/21/11, and 02/02/11 should be denied. NJ Page 3 of 7
4 While respondent acknowledges that claimant billed for these visits with modifier 25, it is respondent s position that the office notes fail to demonstrate that a significant separately identifiable evaluation and management service was performed. I agree. As such, I deny the claim of $ ($59.87 x 7) for CPT code for the 08/25/10, 09/27/10, 10/06/10, 10/27/10, 11/29/10, 12/29/10, and 01/21/11 dates of service. For the reasons discussed below, I deny the $59.87 claim for the 02/02/11 office visit. Medical Necessity Notably, medical necessity for the services from 07/27/10 through 01/31/11 is not disputed as payments were made by respondent during these dates of service. The parties do dispute, however, whether the services on 02/02/11 were medically necessary. Accordingly, I start my analysis of this issue by stating the applicable regulatory provisions and legal principles. The regulatory definition of the phrase medical necessity is set forth in N.J.A.C. 11:3-4.2 as follows: Medically necessary or medical necessity means that the medical treatment or diagnostic test is consistent with the clinically supported symptoms, diagnosis or indications of the injured person, and: 1. The treatment is the most appropriate level of service that is in accordance with the standards of good practice and standard professional treatment protocols including the Care Paths in the Appendix, as applicable; 2. The treatment of the injury is not primarily for the convenience of the injured person or provider; and 3. Does not include unnecessary testing or treatment. The phrase clinically supported is defined in N.J.A.C. 11:3-4.2 as follows: Clinically supported means that a health care provider prior to selecting, performing or ordering the administration of a treatment or diagnostic has: 1. Personally examined the patient to ensure that the proper medical indications exist to justify ordering the treatment or test; 2. Physically examined the patient including making an assessment of any current and/or historical subjective complaints, observations, objective findings, neurological indications and physical tests; 3. Considered any and all previously performed tests that relate to the injury and the results and which are relevant to the proposed treatment or test; and NJ Page 4 of 7
5 4. Recorded and documented these observations, positive and negative findings and conclusions on the patient s medical records. The question of whether medical treatment is necessary is initially decided by the patient s treating physician, and an objectively reasonable belief in the utility of a treatment or diagnostic method based on credible and reliable evidence of its medical value is enough to qualify the expense for PIP purposes. Thermographic Diagnostics, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 125 N.J. 491, 512 (1991). The treating physician enjoys wide discretionary latitude in determining the extent of treatment needed for a particular patient in that it is not unusual to witness a genuine dichotomy of medical opinion as to the type and extent of treatment needed for a particular injury. Elkins v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co., 244 N.J. Super. 695, 701 (App. Div. 1990); Miskofsky v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 203 N.J. Super. 400, 410 (Law Div. 1984). As a result, when there is a conflict in the opinions of the medical experts regarding a patient s treatment or condition, the treating physician s objectively reasonable belief should be accorded greater weight. Mewes v. Union Bldg. & Const. Co., 45 N.J. Super. 88, 94 (App. Div. 1957). Guided by these regulatory provisions and legal principles, I turn to an examination of the relevant facts, informing my consideration of the medical necessity issue. As a result of the severity of patient s injuries, he was taken to Robert Wood Johnson Hospital where he was admitted. He later began treating for his injuries with claimant. At the time of his initial consultation, he complained of cervical pain radiating to his arms with paresthesia, hand pain with paresthesia, mid back pain, low back pain radiating into the legs with paresthesia, knee pain, right ankle pain, headaches, dizziness, and blurry vision. Physical examination revealed weakness and decreased sensation in the right deltoid and biceps brachial. Decreased intersegmental motion of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal regions was also noted. The following orthopedic tests were positive: Foraminal Compression, Cervical Distraction, Shoulder Depressor, Lasegue s, Leg Lowering test, Braggard s, Fabre Patrick, Yeoman s, Hibb s, Kemp s, Soto Hall, Valsalva, and Linders. Based on the subjective complaints and objective findings, patient was placed on a conservative chiropractic treatment plan that consisted of spinal manipulation, mechanical traction, and massage. On 10/27/10, patient was re-evaluated by claimant. At that time, he was showing improvement. Physical examination showed increased range of motion in cervical and lumbar spinal regions since the last evaluation and only Foraminal Compression and Kemp s tests were positive. However, he continued to complain of intermittent moderate neck, mid back, and low back pain. Accordingly additional treatment was recommended. On 01/21/11, patient was re-evaluated by claimant. At that time, he was showing constant static progress. Physical examination revealed increased range of motion. Kemp s and Foraminal Compression tests continued to be positive. Patient continued to complain of occasional mild to moderate neck, middle back, and low back pain. As a result, additional treatment was recommended. Patient treated with claimant until 02/02/11. Respondent made partial payments for the services claimant provided to patient. NJ Page 5 of 7
6 Respondent denied payment for the 02/02/11 services based upon the 01/26/11 chiropractic independent medical examination (IME) performed by Dr. Jay Cohen who opined that patient had reached MMI, and no further chiropractic treatment was medically necessary. Where there is a dispute as to PIP benefits, the burden rests on the claimant to establish by a preponderance of the evidence; that is, the greater weight of the credible evidence, that the services for which PIP payment is sought were reasonable, medically necessary and causally related to an automobile accident. Miltner v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 175 N.J. Super. 156 (Law Div. 1980). While it is true the treating physician s opinion is not automatically accorded conclusive weight, Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord, 123 S. Ct (2003), (relating to ERISA Plans), it is accorded an appropriate measure of deference. Having considered the arguments of counsel in light of the record and applicable regulatory provisions and legal principles, I conclude that claimant has not proven by a preponderance of the credible evidence the medical necessity of the services on 02/02/11. In reaching this conclusion, I find persuasive the opinion of Dr. Cohen. Accordingly, I deny the claim for the 02/02/11 services. That said, I note that the hearing was left open for respondent to provide Explanation of Benefits (EOBs) reflecting payments allegedly made. Respondent, however, did not provide any EOBs post-hearing. Consequently, I accept as accurate the payment amounts reflected in claimant s post-hearing Arbitration Summary. Therefore, I award $76.99 for CPT codes and for the 09/27/10, 09/29/10, 10/01/10, 10/18/10, 10/20/10, 10/22/10, 11/15/10, 12/03/10, 12/10/10, 01/24/11, and 01/28/11 dates of service. The medical necessity of these services provided on these dates is not contested. The total amount awarded is $ ($76.99 x 11). Taking into account the amounts paid by respondent, I also award the following: (1) $ for CPT code for the 07/27/10 date of service; (2) $1.00 for the 08/16/10 date of service, representing the difference between the fee schedule amounts for CPT codes and and the amounts paid; (3) $4.92 for the 10/06/10 date of service, representing the difference between the fee schedule amounts for CPT codes and and the amounts paid; (4) $11.67 for the 10/08/10 date of service, representing the difference between the fee schedule amounts for CPT codes and and the amounts paid; and (5) $50.79 for the 12/01/10 date of service, representing the difference between the fee schedule amounts for CPT codes and and the amounts paid. In sum, the total amount awarded is $1, On a final note, as respondent is a successor to the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund, counsel fees, costs, and interest are not recoverable in a claim against respondent. See Cheatham v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judg. Bd., 178 N.J. Super. 437 (App. Div. 1981) and Gargiulo v. Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co., 265 N.J. Super. 225 (App. Div. 1993). See also N.J.S.A. 17:30-5, et seq. and N.J.S.A. 39:6-61, et seq. Accordingly, no costs, fees, or interest are awarded. NJ Page 6 of 7
7 Therefore, the DRP ORDERS: 1. Medical Expense Benefits: Awarded: Disposition of Claims Submitted Medical Provider Amount Claimed Amount Awarded Payable To Back Pain, P.C. $3, $1, Back Pain, P.C. *subject to co-payment and deductible 2. Income Continuation Benefits: Not in issue 3. Essential Services Benefits: Not in issue 4. Death or Funeral Expense Benefits: Not in issue 5. Interest: I find that the Claimant did prevail. Interest is not awarded pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5h.: N/A Attorney s Fees and Costs I find that the Claimant did not prevail and I award no costs and fees. I find that the Claimant prevailed and I award the following costs and fees (payable to Claimant s attorney unless otherwise indicated) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.2g: Costs: $ N/A Attorney s Fees: $ N/A THIS AWARD is rendered in full satisfaction of all claims and issues presented in the arbitration proceeding. Entered in the State of New Jersey Date: 05/31/13 NJ Page 7 of 7
Award of Dispute Resolution Professional
In the Matter of the Arbitration between JERSEY REHAB A/S/O C.R. CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ1203001435098 Insurance Claim File No: ALE84350 Claimant Counsel: Melvin D. Marx, P.A. v. Claimant Attorney
More informationAward of Dispute Resolution Professional. Hearing Information
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Allied PT & Acupuncture a/s/o V.B. CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ1012001364788 Insurance Claim File No: NJP66574 Claimant Counsel: Pacifico & Lawrence v. Claimant
More informationA M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL
CASE NO. 18 Z 600 19775 03 2 A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS In the Matter of the Arbitration between (Claimant) AAA CASE NO.: 18 Z 600 19775 03 v.
More informationA M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL
CASE NO. 18 Z 600 10126 02 2 A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS In the Matter of the Arbitration between (Claimant) AAA CASE NO.: 18 Z 600 10126 02 v.
More informationAward of Dispute Resolution Professional
In the Matter of the Arbitration between North Jersey Rehabilitation Center a/s/o Y.L. CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ0903001250685 Insurance Claim File No: 040900064409-003 Claimant Counsel: Joseph
More informationAward of Dispute Resolution Professional
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Hudson Pain Management, Osteopathic Medicine a/s/o C. B. CLAIMANT(s), Forum File No: NJ0904001256220 Insurance Claim File No: 254801049148 v. Claimant Attorney
More informationA M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL
CASE NO. 18 Z 600 08077 03 2 A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS In the Matter of the Arbitration between (Claimant) AAA CASE NO.: 18 Z 600 08077 03 v.
More informationHow To Find Out If You Can Get A Medical Expense Benefit From A Car Accident
CASE NO. 18 Z 600 01641 03 2 A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS In the Matter of the Arbitration between (Claimant) AAA CASE NO.: 18 Z 600 01641 03 v.
More informationAward of Dispute Resolution Professional
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Objective Diagnostic & Rehab Services a/s/o V.K. CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ1003001314411 Insurance Claim File No: 58993 Claimant Counsel: Law Offices of
More informationAward of Dispute Resolution Professional. Hearing Information
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Xcalibur Chiropractic a/s/o M.P. CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ1111001414166 Insurance Claim File No: NJP87566 Claimant Counsel: Console & Hollawell v. Claimant
More informationAward of Dispute Resolution Professional
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Dr. Arthur C. Rothman MD a/s/o JMI CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ0909001283720 Insurance Claim File No: 0285625840101018 Claimant Counsel: Law Offices of Thomas
More informationAward of Dispute Resolution Professional
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Neurology & Pain Treatment Center a/s/o J.A. CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ1108001403811 Insurance Claim File No: NJP86737 Claimant Counsel: Law Office of
More informationIn the Matter of the Arbitration between
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Advanced Spine Surgery Center a/s/o Magdalena Villacis CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ1409001581707 Proceeding Type: In Person Insurance Claim File No: 20951803
More informationAward of Dispute Resolution Professional
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Atlantic Orthopaedic Associates a/s/o M.C. CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ1010001354284 Insurance Claim File No: 0267652480101027 Claimant Counsel: Law Offices
More informationAward of Dispute Resolution Professional
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Neurosurgical Spine Specialists of NJ A/S/O D.O. CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ1102001370534 Insurance Claim File No: 0336333740101035 Claimant Counsel: Law
More informationSUBCHAPTER 29. MEDICAL FEE SCHEDULES: AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION AND MOTOR BUS MEDICAL EXPENSE INSURANCE COVERAGE
SUBCHAPTER 29. MEDICAL FEE SCHEDULES: AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION AND MOTOR BUS MEDICAL EXPENSE INSURANCE COVERAGE 11:3-29.1 Purpose and scope (a) This subchapter implements the provisions
More informationAward of Dispute Resolution Professional. In Person Proceeding Information
In the Matter of the Arbitration between ADVANCED ORTHOPAEDICS & SPORTS MEDICINE CENTER, PC A/S/O G.B. CLAIMANT(s), Forthright File No: NJ1202001429526 Proceeding Type: In Person Insurance Claim File No:
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION ATLANTIC CITY DISTRICT
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION ATLANTIC CITY DISTRICT CAPE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER : (Jeffrey Davis) Petitioner, : CLAIM PETITION NO. 2012-28812 v. : RESERVED
More informationCARE PATHS/DECISION POINT REVIEW
Personal Service Insurance Company PO Box 3001 Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 Ph: 610.832.4940 Fax: 610.832.2138 Toll Free: 800.954.2442 Date (##/##/####) Physician Name Street Address City, State, Zip Claimant:
More informationDECISION POINT REVIEW PLAN REQUIREMENTS IMPORTANT INFORMATION
NJM Insurance 301 Sullivan Way, West Trenton, NJ 08628 Group 609-883-1300 / www.njm.com DECISION POINT REVIEW PLAN REQUIREMENTS IMPORTANT INFORMATION For Licensed Health Care Providers About No-Fault Medical
More informationThe effective date of the plan is the date approved by the Department of Banking and Insurance.
Decision Point Review/Pre-Certification Plan for: New Jersey Skylands Management, LLC servicing: New Jersey Skylands Insurance Association (NAIC# 11454) New Jersey Skylands Insurance Company (NAIC# 11453)
More informationPERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The purpose of this subchapter is to establish procedures for the resolution of disputes
SUBCHAPTER 5. PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION 11:3-5.1 Purpose and scope (a) The purpose of this subchapter is to establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning the payment
More informationDECISION POINT REVIEW PLAN REQUIREMENTS
NJM Insurance 301 Sullivan Way, West Trenton, NJ 08628 Group 609-883-1300 / www.njm.com DECISION POINT REVIEW PLAN REQUIREMENTS IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR NO-FAULT MEDICAL COVERAGE For NJM Insurance
More informationENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY DECISION POINT & PRECERTIFICATION PLAN
ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY DECISION POINT & PRECERTIFICATION PLAN DECISION POINT REVIEW: Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 11:3-4, the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance has published standard
More informationIMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION COVERAGE (ALSO KNOWN AS NO-FAULT MEDICAL COVERAGE)
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION COVERAGE (ALSO KNOWN AS NO-FAULT MEDICAL COVERAGE) The New Jersey Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA) introduced changes to how auto
More informationFor all of the reasons set forth, we enter the following: Herd Chiropractic v. State Farm
180 DAUPHIN COUNTY REPORTS [124 Dauph. Proposed Distribution, Exhibit F; Answer of CHFI to Petition for Relief, para. 17) Therefore, CHFI is not a health care provider, the type to which the testator intended
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION RONALD L. MARTENS Claimant VS. BRULEZ FOUNDATION, INC. Respondent Docket No. 1,019,265 AND COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INS. CO. Insurance
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION DALE L. STILWELL ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) BOEING COMPANY and ) Docket Nos. 253,800 CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY ) & 1,031,180 Respondents
More informationCURE DECISION POINT REVIEW PLAN (DPRP) DISCLOSURE NOTICE Page 1 of 5
CURE DECISION POINT REVIEW PLAN (DPRP) DISCLOSURE NOTICE Page 1 of 5 How To Comply with the DPRP Requirements Of Your CURE Policy The 'Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act' was signed into law on May
More informationCountryway Insurance Company P.O. Box 4851, Syracuse, New York 13221-4851
Countryway Insurance Company P.O. Box 4851, Syracuse, New York 13221-4851 Dear Insured: Personal Injury Protection (PIP) is the portion of the auto policy that provides coverage for medical expenses. These
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F205928 DOUGLAS EUGENE WHIPKEY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT XPRESS BOATS, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F205928 DOUGLAS EUGENE WHIPKEY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT XPRESS BOATS, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT
More informationThe Law Office of Jeffrey Randolph, LLC Admitted in NJ & NY Admitted in U.S. Court of Appeals -Third Circuit Admitted in U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Law Office of Jeffrey Randolph, LLC Admitted in NJ & NY Admitted in U.S. Court of Appeals -Third Circuit Admitted in U.S. Court of Federal Claims New Jersey Office: New York Office: 139 Harristown
More informationINTRODUCTION. The Workers Compensation Act provides in part as follows:
INTRODUCTION The Maryland Workers Compensation Commission (Commission) amended COMAR 14.09.03.01 (Guide of Medical and Surgical Fees) on February 12, 2004. AUTHORITY The Workers Compensation Act provides
More informationEXHIBIT COORDINATING PROVISIONS-STATE/FEDERAL LAW, ACCREDITATION STANDARDS AND GEOGRAPHIC EXCEPTIONS NEW JERSEY
EXHIBIT COORDINATING PROVISIONS-STATE/FEDERAL LAW, ACCREDITATION STANDARDS AND GEOGRAPHIC EXCEPTIONS NEW JERSEY I. INTRODUCTION: 1. Scope: To the extent of any conflict between the Agreement and this State
More informationCOMPENSATION ORDER TIMOTHY BURROUGHS, ) Claimant, ) ) AHD No. 06-094 v. ) OWC No. 597835 J & J MAINTENANCE, INC., ) and ) AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, )
IN THE MATTER OF, TIMOTHY BURROUGHS, Claimant, AHD No. 06-094 v. OWC No. 597835 J & J MAINTENANCE, INC., and AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, Employer/Carrier. Appearances REBEKAH ARCH MILLER, ESQUIRE For the Claimant
More informationSOAH DOCKET NO. 453-03-2976.M4 MDR Tracking No. M4-02-4021.01. SOUTHWEST HELICOPTERS BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE Petitioner
SOAH DOCKET NO. 453-03-2976.M4 MDR Tracking No. M4-02-4021.01 SOUTHWEST HELICOPTERS BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE Petitioner V. OF TRANSCONTINENTAL INS. CO. Respondent ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DECISION AND ORDER
More informationHow To Get A Spinal Cord Stimulator
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MICHAEL L. McDONALD Claimant VS. FIBERGLASS SYSTEMS, LP Respondent Docket No. 1,003,977 AND PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INS. CO. Insurance
More informationOverview of the Provisions of the NJ Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act
Overview of the Provisions of the NJ Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act has requested that CorVel Corporation work with you and your physician to assure that you receive all medically
More informationDECISION POINT REVIEW
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY/ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY DECISION POINT REVIEW PLAN INCLUSIVE OF PRE-CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT DECISION POINT REVIEW Pursuant to
More informationNew Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules (2013)
New Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules (2013) Amended March 1, 2013 ADMINISTERED BY FORTHRIGHT New Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules 2 PART I RULES OF GENERAL APPLICATION...5 1. Scope of Rules...5
More informationState Farm Indemnity Company State Farm Guaranty Insurance Company Personal Injury Protection Benefits New Jersey Decision Point Review Plan
State Farm Indemnity Company State Farm Guaranty Insurance Company Personal Injury Protection Benefits New Jersey Decision Point Review Plan Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 11:3-4.7, State Farm submits the following
More informationAmerican Commerce Insurance Company
American Commerce Insurance Company INITIAL INFORMATION LETTER TO INSURED/CLAIMANT/PROVIDERS Dear Insured and/or /Eligible Injured Person/Medical Provider: Please read this letter carefully because it
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF LABOR AND MANAGEMENT
SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF LABOR AND MANAGEMENT GREG STURTZ, HF No. 277, 2000/01 Claimant, v. DECISION YOUNKERS, INC., Employer, and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Insurer. This is a workers
More informationCountryway Insurance Company P.O. Box 4851, Syracuse, New York 13221-4851
Dear Insured: Please read this letter carefully because it provides specific information concerning how a medical claim under personal injury protection coverage will be handled, including specific requirements
More informationOur Customer: Claim Number: Date of Loss: Dear
MetLife Auto & Home Our Customer: Claim Number: Date of Loss: Dear Personal Injury Protection (PIP) is the portion of the auto policy that provides coverage for medical expenses. These medical expenses
More informationNew Jersey Regional Claims PO Box 5483 Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 Phone : 1-800-451-5982 Fax : 856-235-6232. Date (##/##/####)
New Jersey Regional Claims PO Box 5483 Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 Phone : 1-800-451-5982 Fax : 856-235-6232 Date (##/##/####) Physician Name Street Address City, State, Zip Claimant: Claim Number: Medlogix
More informationINITIAL INFORMATION LETTER TO INSURED/CLAIMANT/PROVIDERS Sent on Concentra Integrated Services Letter Head
INITIAL INFORMATION LETTER TO INSURED/CLAIMANT/PROVIDERS Sent on Concentra Integrated Services Letter Head Dear Insured and/or Eligible Injured Person/Medical Provider: Please read this letter carefully
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION DONALD BRYAN SMITHHISLER Claimant VS. LIFE CARE CENTERS AMERICA, INC. Respondent Docket No. 1,014,349 AND OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE
More information10 Woodbridge Center Drive * PO Box 5038* Woodbridge, NJ 07095
10 Woodbridge Center Drive * PO Box 5038* Woodbridge, NJ 07095 Date Name Address RE: CLAIMANT: CLAIM#: INSURANCE CO: CAMDEN FIRE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION CISI#: DOL: Dear : Please read this letter carefully
More informationSOAH DOCKET NO. 453-04-4583.M2 TWCC MR NO. M2-04-0846-01 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' DECISION AND ORDER I. JURISDICTION, NOTICE, AND VENUE
SOAH DOCKET NO. 453-04-4583.M2 TWCC MR NO. M2-04-0846-01 FIRST RIO VALLEY MEDICAL, P.A., Petitioner V. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., Respondent BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DECISION
More informationMARITIME WORKER JOB RELATED INJURY
JEFFREY S. MUTNICK, P.C. jmutnick@mutnicklaw.com Admitted in Oregon MARITIME WORKER JOB RELATED INJURY As a maritime worker, your employer must provide compensation for job-related injuries. This entitlement
More informationCompany Name: Claim Number: Loss Date: Policy Holder: Premier Prizm Acct No.: Injured Party:
PO Box 9515 Fredericksburg, VA 22403-9515 Mail Date: Date Loss Reported to GEICO:!!!### Company Name: Claim Number: Loss Date: Policy Holder: Premier Prizm Acct No.: Injured Party: Personal Injury Protection
More informationNotice of Independent Review Decision DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICE OR SERVICES IN DISPUTE:
Notice of Independent Review Decision DATE OF REVIEW: 08/15/08 IRO CASE #: NAME: DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICE OR SERVICES IN DISPUTE: Determine the appropriateness of the previously denied request for physical
More informationINITIAL INFORMATION LETTER TO INSURED/CLAIMANT/PROVIDER/ATTORNEY
685 Highway 202/206, Suite 301 P.O. Box 5919 Bridgewater, NJ 08807 (908) 243-1800 Toll free 1-800-987-2032 Fax 1-877-397-5868 INITIAL INFORMATION LETTER TO INSURED/CLAIMANT/PROVIDER/ATTORNEY «Date «PersonName_To»
More informationChrista Hoisington v. Ingersoll Electric (December 28, 2009) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. By: Phyllis Phillips, Esq. v.
Christa Hoisington v. Ingersoll Electric (December 28, 2009) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Christa Hoisington Opinion No. 52-09WC By: Phyllis Phillips, Esq. v. Hearing Officer Ingersoll Electric
More informationA BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE BENEFITS AND PERILS OF THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT
A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE BENEFITS AND PERILS OF THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT If you were injured at work or know a family member or friend who was injured at work, I hope that the following information
More informationHow To Get Reimbursed For A Car Accident
PRAETORIAN INSURANCE COMPANY PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION IMPORTANT NOTICE TO POLICYHOLDERS MEDICAL PROTOCOLS DECISION POINT REVIEW: Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 11:3-4, the New Jersey Department of Banking and
More informationWorkers Compensation Provider Billing Guidelines
Billing transactions are covered under Chapter 127 (127.201 through 127.211) of the Workers Compensation Act (the Act) for the State of Pennsylvania: Workers Compensation Medical Cost Containment rules
More informationModifier -25 Significant, Separately Identifiable E/M Service
Manual: Policy Title: Reimbursement Policy Modifier -25 Significant, Separately Identifiable E/M Service Section: Modifiers Subsection: None Date of Origin: 1/1/2000 Policy Number: RPM028 Last Updated:
More informationIMPORTANT NOTICE. Decision Point Review & Pre-Certification Requirements INTRODUCTION
IMPORTANT NOTICE Decision Point Review & Pre-Certification Requirements INTRODUCTION At GEICO, we understand that when you purchase an automobile insurance policy, you are buying protection and peace of
More informationDECISION POINT REVIEW AND PRE-CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER YOUR AUTO POLICY
PAC 3606 TL (Ed. 1/06) Twin Lights Decision Point Review Plan DECISION POINT REVIEW AND PRE-CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER YOUR AUTO POLICY The following provisions apply in the event that you (or anyone
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IA Construction Corporation and : Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., : Petitioners : : v. : No. 2151 C.D. 2013 : Argued: November 10, 2014 Workers Compensation Appeal
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 1 GLENDA MONROE, v. Plaintiff V. JAMES MAKKER, M.D.; EAST PORTLAND SURGERY CENTER, LLC; and PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM - OREGON, an
More informationThomas J. Kibbie v. Killington/Pico Ski Resort (February 5, 2013) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Thomas J. Kibbie v. Killington/Pico Ski Resort (February 5, 2013) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Thomas J. Kibbie Opinion No. 03-13WC v. By: Jane Woodruff, Esq. Hearing Officer Killington/Pico Ski
More informationSTATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRY DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS WORKERS COMPENSATION SECTION
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRY DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS WORKERS COMPENSATION SECTION NEVADA MEDICAL FEE SCHEDULE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PROVIDER PAYMENT February 1, 2012 through January
More informationL. R. v. Fletcher Allen Health Care (January 4, 2007) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
L. R. v. Fletcher Allen Health Care (January 4, 2007) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR L. R. Opinion No. 57-06WC By: Margaret A. Mangan v. Hearing Officer Fletcher Allen Health Care For: Patricia Moulton
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED DECISION POINT REVIEW/PRE-CERTIFICATION QUESTIONS
FREQUENTLY ASKED DECISION POINT REVIEW/PRE-CERTIFICATION QUESTIONS INTRODUCTION At 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company, we understand that when you purchase an automobile insurance policy, you are
More informationGEICO General Insurance Company
GEICO General Insurance Company Buffalo/New Jersey Claims, PO BOX 9515 Fredericksburg, VA 22403-9515 Date Date Loss Reported to GEICO: Company Name: Claim Number: Loss Date: Policyholder: Policy Number:
More information: PETITIONER, : V. COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION : BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, : ESSEX COUNTY, : RESPONDENT.
#131-14 (OAL Decision Not yet available online) DANA GREENE, PETITIONER, V. COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE DECISION TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, ESSEX COUNTY, RESPONDENT. SYNOPSIS Pursuant
More informationKey Provisions of Tennessee Senate Bill 200 Effective July 1, 2014, through July 1, 2016
2014 Construction of Statute Definition of Injury (Causation) Revises Section 50-6-116, Construction of Chapter, to indicate that for dates of injury on or after July 1, 2014, the chapter should no longer
More informationJohn Coronis v. Granger Northern Inc. (April 27, 2010) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
John Coronis v. Granger Northern Inc. (April 27, 2010) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR John Coronis Opinion No. 16-10WC v. By: Sal Spinosa, Esq. Hearing Officer Granger Northern, Inc. ATTORNEYS: For:
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
TINA L. TALMADGE, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION CONNIE S. BURN and ALVAN A. BURN, and Defendants, THE HARTFORD, Defendant/Intervenor- Respondent.
More informationTITLE 11. INSURANCE CHAPTER 3. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE SUBCHAPTER 5. PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION
TITLE 11. INSURANCE CHAPTER 3. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE SUBCHAPTER 5. PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION 11:3-5.1 Purpose and scope (a) The purpose of this subchapter is to establish procedures
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this a Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationHow To Write A Plan For A Car Accident In New Jersey
Date Name Name Address City, State Zip ATTN: PATIENT NAME: CLAIM NUMBER: DATE OF LOSS: Dear Doctor: Personal Injury Protection (PIP) is the portion of the auto policy that provides coverage for medical
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF LABOR AND MANAGEMENT WORKERS COMPENSATION. CALVIN BOSWORTH, HF No. 173, 2008/09
SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF LABOR AND MANAGEMENT WORKERS COMPENSATION CALVIN BOSWORTH, HF No. 173, 2008/09 Claimant, v. DECISION P.I.E INC., and CONTINENTAL WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY v.
More informationDECISION POINT REVIEW AND PRE-CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER YOUR AUTO POLICY
PO Box 920 Lincroft, NJ 07738 Underwritten by Teachers Auto Insurance Company of New Jersey TIP 3606 (Ed. 3/12) Decision Point Review Plan DECISION POINT REVIEW AND PRE-CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER
More informationBEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CONSENT ORDER
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of ) State Farm Mutual Automobile ) Docket No. 3594-CO Insurance Company ) CONSENT ORDER The Kansas Insurance Department ( KID
More information00/00/00 CARE PATHS/DECISION POINT REVIEW
00/00/00 FIRST-NAME MI LAST-NAME BUSINESS-NAME ST-NO STREET UNIT-NO CITY, STATE ZIP Insured: INSD-FIRST-NAME INSD-MI INSD-LAST-NAME Claim No: CLAIM-NO DIV-EX Date of Loss: MO-LOSS/DAY-LOSS/YR Dear DEAR-NAME:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-WC-02083-COA HOWARD INDUSTRIES INC. MISSISSIPPI WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALED:
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-WC-02083-COA ELSA PEREZ APPELLANT v. HOWARD INDUSTRIES INC. APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/27/2013 TRIBUNAL FROM WHICH MISSISSIPPI WORKERS COMPENSATION
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Carmelo Olivares Hernandez, No. 2305 C.D. 2014 Petitioner Submitted May 15, 2015 v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Giorgio Foods, Inc.), Respondent BEFORE
More informationHOUSE BILL 119 PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION 2012
HOUSE BILL 119 PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION 2012 Eric S. Rice, Esq. CINCINNATI, OH COLUMBUS, OH DETROIT, MI FT. MITCHELL, KY ORLANDO, FL SARASOTA, FL www.smithrolfes.com Brief Synopsis Under the bill, to
More informationSAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY EMERGENCY STORAGE PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT. Appendix B
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY EMERGENCY STORAGE PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT Appendix B Workers Compensation. 1. The Contractor and the Union parties to the Emergency Storage Project Labor Agreement (the
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G103629 SHIKITA WRIGHT, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED JULY 10, 2013
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G103629 SHIKITA WRIGHT, EMPLOYEE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EMPLOYER PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIVISION, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Workers Compensation Board
Commonwealth of Kentucky Workers Compensation Board OPINION ENTERED: June 6, 2014 CLAIM NOS. 201300659 & 201300144 ATWOOD T. DEZARN PETITIONER/CROSS-RESPONDENT VS. APPEAL FROM HON. JEANIE OWEN MILLER,
More informationNC WORKERS COMPENSATION: BASIC INFORMATION FOR MEDICAL PROVIDERS
NC WORKERS COMPENSATION: BASIC INFORMATION FOR MEDICAL PROVIDERS CURRENT AS OF APRIL 1, 2010 I. INFORMATION SOURCES Where is information available for medical providers treating patients with injuries/conditions
More informationTHE ALMOST HASSLE-FREE WAY TO COLLECT PA WORKERS COMPENSATION MEDICAL BILLS
www.workinjuryinpa.com THE ALMOST HASSLE-FREE WAY TO COLLECT PA WORKERS COMPENSATION MEDICAL BILLS This book has the forms and guidance to get your workers compensation medical bills paid. THE ALMOST HASSLE-FREE
More informationWorkers Compensation Mandatory Attorney Fees
STATE OF NEW JERSEY NEW JERSEY LAW REVISION COMMISSION Draft Tentative Report Relating to November 7, 2011 This draft tentative report is distributed to advise interested persons of the Commission's tentative
More informationAmerican Commerce Insurance Company
American Commerce Insurance Company Decision Point Review Plan And Pre-certification Requirements DECISION POINT REVIEW Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 11:3-4, the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance has
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. HAN HUNG LUONG, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, FRANK T. GEORGE, and Defendant-Respondent,
More informationAuthorized By: Kenneth E. Kobylowski, Commissioner, Department of Banking and Insurance.
INSURANCE 46 NJR 5(2) May 19, 2014 Filed April 16, 2014 DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF INSURANCE Office of the Insurance Claims Ombudsman Proposed Readoption with Amendments: N.J.A.C.
More informationPRE-CERTIFICATION AND DECISION POINT REVIEW PLAN
PRE-CERTIFICATION AND DECISION POINT REVIEW PLAN The New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance has published standard courses of treatment, identified as Care Paths, for soft tissue injuries of the
More informationPUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A.
PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A. 201 EAST PINE STREET 15 TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 4940 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32802-4940 TELEPHONE (407) 839-0120 TELECOPIER (407) 841-9726 ORLANDO@RISSMAN.COM
More informationMs. Jackson is the Manager of Health Finance and Reimbursement, Division of Health Policy and Practice Services, Washington, DC.
Electrodiagnostic Testing with Same Day Evaluation Management By: Shane J. Burr, MD; Scott I. Horn, DO; Jenny J. Jackson, MPH, CPC; Joseph P. Purcell, DO Dr. Burr practices general inpatient and outpatient
More informationPERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE. NAME: Date of Accident
PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE NAME: Date of Accident Where did accident happen? Describe the accident in your own words: What was your position in the car? Driver: if Driver were your hands on the steering
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 LUZ RIVERA AND ABRIANNA RIVERA Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RONALD MANZI Appellee No. 948 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Order
More informationCase Studies Updated 10.24.11
S O L U T I O N S Case Studies Updated 10.24.11 Hill DT Solutions Cervical Decompression Case Study An 18-year-old male involved in a motor vehicle accident in which his SUV was totaled suffering from
More informationTHE MEDICAL TREATMENT GUIDELINES
THE MEDICAL TREATMENT GUIDELINES I. INTRODUCTION A. About the Medical Treatment Guidelines. On December 1, 2010, the NYS Workers' Compensation Board is implementing new regulations and Medical Treatment
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F102457 OPINION FILED JULY 20, 2004
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F102457 KEN WATERS, EMPLOYEE CENTURY TUBE CORPORATION, EMPLOYER CROCKETT ADJUSTMENT, CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED
More informationSteven M. Goldman, Commissioner, Department of Banking and
INSURANCE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF INSURANCE Personal Injury Protection Benefits; Medical Protocols; Diagnostic Tests Deductibles and Co pays Proposed Amendment: N.J.A.C. 11:3 4.4
More information