1 Evaluation Report: Supporting Multiple Workloads with the Lenovo S3200 Storage Array Evaluation report prepared under contract with Lenovo Executive Summary Virtualization is a key strategy to reduce the capital expense of enterprise hardware. Running multiple applications maximizes the return on investment of servers and storage. Unfortunately, just piling more I/O on to devices such as traditional storage arrays has drawbacks. Hard disk drive (HDD) only arrays have trouble supporting simultaneous diverse workloads. Differing I/O patterns cause conflict with regard to the placement of data, mechanical motion of drive arms, and on-drive cache usage. A traditional way to manage this is by significantly over-provisioning the number of drives to keep data on the outer cylinders of magnetic platters. This wastes a good deal of the drive space to keep IOPS and bandwidth up, whereas a single solid state drive can deliver the IOPS and bandwidth of an entire shelf or more of HDDs. The Lenovo S3200 flexible hybrid array is ideal for small and medium businesses seeking to cut costs by consolidating applications onto fewer storage devices. Lenovo offers upgrade options to the S3200 by allowing customers to convert a basic all-hdd array into a hybrid array by replacing some of the drives with flash to accelerate performance instead of deploying expansion shelves. With the addition of a customer-defined number of solid state drives (SSDs), the array can be configured to accelerate read performance with an SSD read cache, or both read and write performance with real-time data tiering. Demartek evaluated the S3200 supporting a multiple-application workload in a VMware vsphere environment. Running common applications like Microsoft Exchange Server, SQL Server, SharePoint, a web server, and an SMB fileserver simultaneously, we compared the performance of an array with only HDD storage to that with an SSD read cache and with SSD tiering enabled. We saw storage performance improve for both acceleration technologies. The maximum being a 2.4X bandwidth increase overall (which contributed to a 7X increase for an SQL Server application, specifically). Storage latencies decreased by up to 70%. This contributed to a dramatic 5X reduction in the database application I/O response times with no adverse effect on other applications.
2 Page 2 of 22 The Lenovo S3200 Lenovo s S3200 Storage Array (Figure 1) is a dual controller, 2 rack unit storage array supporting either 24 small form factor (SSF) drives or inch drives. The S3200 array supports 8 Gb and 16 Gb Fibre Channel as well as 1 Gb and 10 Gb iscsi. Each array can support seven expansion units for a maximum of 768 TB of total storage capacity. Figure 1 - Lenovo S3200 The base configuration of HDDs is upgradable by replacing some HDDs with flash storage. Lenovo SAN Manager handles the addition of SSDs to an array by enabling the creation of an SSD read cache or an SSD performance tier, where active data is migrated from HDD to SSD every 5 seconds. This evaluation was performed with an S3200 array provisioned with 20 SSF 900 GB 10k rpm HDDs. Four 400 GB SSDs were supplied for read caching and performance tiering upgrades. With this hardware, we executed a 20 HDD baseline test case in which 10 drives were assigned to each controller in a RAID 6 configuration. To evaluate read caching, we added a single SSD to each controller, configured as single drive read cache disk groups. For measuring the effect of SSD tiering, two SSDs in a RAID 1 disk group were added to each controller. Three volumes were created from these drives and added to vsphere as datastores. The first was used for all virtual machine files. The other two, much larger volumes, were dedicated application datastores. Application virtual drives were provisioned evenly from disk space managed by each controller to best spread the I/O load across the array. Appendix B diagrams the array configuration and volume mapping to vsphere datastores. The Mixed Workload Virtualization is a common, and arguably preferred, method of consolidating multiple applications onto a shared hardware platform. Therefore, we evaluated an S3200 array in a vsphere environment with several application servers running in virtual machines (VMs). We imagined a small to medium sized business of about 150 employees and created several VMs to support common applications that such a business might deploy.
3 Page 3 of 22 Five application VMs and two infrastructure VMs shared the same S3200 array for virtual machine files and application data. Setup details for the virtual machines are described in Appendix A. The test workloads were intentionally designed to model what seemed to be a reasonable use case for the business we envisioned. This included some number of the users exercising different applications at the same time. As with real businesses, only a small number of users are likely to be accessing any one IT resource at a given time. We made some educated guesses as to what those user counts could potentially be. The workload included VMs hosting Microsoft Exchange, SQL Server (executing a version of the TPC-E benchmark to drive I/O load), and SharePoint, along with a static content Webserver and an SMB fileserver. We chose to use Microsoft Exchange Jetstress to model Exchange as Jetstress validates storage systems by setting hard limits on the amount of latency database operations may experience. For this reason, we designed the workload intensity such that Jetstress validation criteria were met by all array configurations, regardless of the performance of the other applications. With Jetstress, in essence, defining the SLA for the consolidated application environment, the goal was to evaluate the benefit to the other applications by upgrading the array with flash. The assumption was that by adding SSD read caching or tiering, the Lenovo S3200 would accelerate the performance of one of more applications while maintaining or improving the service level of the shared environment as a whole. Detailed descriptions of the workloads and user counts are available in appendix C. Performance Metrics Key metrics for storage system performance analysis are I/Os per second (IOPS), bandwidth, and latency or response time. These metrics are defined as follows: IOPS I/Os per second a measure of the total I/O operations (reads and writes) issued by the application servers. Bandwidth a measure of the data transfer rate, or I/O throughput, measured in MegaBytes per second (MBPS). Latency a measure of the time taken to complete an I/O request, also known as response time. This is frequently measured in milliseconds (one thousandth of a
4 Page 4 of 22 second). Latency is introduced into the SAN at many points, including the server and HBA, SAN switching, and at the storage target(s) and media. It is important to consider all three metrics when evaluating the performance of storage systems because all three contribute to how the storage will support an application. IOPS drive bandwidth. The number of IOPS times the I/O request size determines the amount of bandwidth delivered. Latency can have a very significant effect on application performance and user experience. Transactional applications can be quite sensitive. For instance, Microsoft Exchange Jetstress sets an upper limit of 20 milliseconds for database reads and writes to certify any storage system. Unlike IOPS and bandwidth, where more is better, with latency the goal is to keep it as low as possible. Performance metrics were gathered at the hypervisor, with the vsphere esxtop utility, and within the VMs with Windows Perfmon and Linux systats.
5 Results and Analysis Lenovo S3200 with a Mixed Application Workload Page 5 of 22 All businesses will place unique demands on storage systems. The workload designed for this evaluation and these results are an example of one possible scenario. Figure 2 - Total Bandwidth This is a punishing workload to run on a single shelf HDD array. The multiple I/O patterns cause competition for storage resources, such as disk drive head motion, cache space, and controller performance. Without flash enhancement, the HDD-only array was able to deliver about 52 MB/s of total bandwidth (Figure 2), which included all VM files and vsphere infrastructure, as well as all application data. Array performance contributes to the overall user and application experience. Obviously, low I/O latency at the array will be passed along on to the hypervisor and ultimately the guest VMs. At first glance, latency looks pretty good for an all-hdd array, at an average of 7.1 milliseconds when measured at the hypervisor layer (Figure 3).
6 Page 6 of 22 Figure 3 - Storage system response times However, overhead in the hypervisor and guest operating systems contribute to latency increases experienced by virtual drives within the guest OS. To develop a clearer picture of the application experience, we measured response times of the virtual drives within the VMs as well. These response times are always higher than the raw storage device latency. Our first observation was that the webserver was very quickly cached in memory and little I/O went to the array, so we focused our attention on the remaining four applications. The highest average database transactional latency experienced by Microsoft Jetstress was 17.7 milliseconds (Figure 4), within the threshold of acceptability set by Jetstress. Therefore, every configuration, with and without SSD acceleration, met our initial criteria for storage validation. Without the benefit of flash acceleration, the SQL server application saw very high virtual storage latencies. This is cause for concern and, if nothing else, should deter our hypothetical company from any further consolidation onto the array. Depending on business impacts, they may be advised to relocate the SQL Server application to another device. However, this situation changed with the addition of SSDs to the array.
7 Page 7 of 22 Figure 4 - Virtual drive latencies SQL Server clearly gained the benefit when either flash solution was implemented. Latency decreased by roughly a factor of 5 in both cases. The bigger question is a matter of why this one application received such a boost while the others remained at more-or-less steady state conditions. The TPC-E benchmark, which was used to drive SQL Server I/O, includes a large proportion of random reads, which are very flash-friendly. It seems likely that this I/O was quite compatible with the caching and tiering algorithms employed by the S3200 array. The very large delta between no flash and SSD acceleration also points to the SQL server workload being constrained by the amount I/O the HDD-only configuration could support. The other workloads may have been satisfied with lesser I/O and bandwidth, minimizing I/O request queuing. When we examine the application bandwidth data, this theory will receive additional support. Curiously, Jetstress, the fileserver, and SharePoint saw latency slightly increase when the array was upgraded with SSDs, in one or both of the configurations. We suspect this is related to SQL Server s strong performance boost. As the database workload runs faster, its transactions require more data. With limited SSD space, some portion of this data must come from the HDDs, which drives up the number of I/O requests to those devices. Since
8 Page 8 of 22 the HDDs cannot serve any additional I/O over the baseline, queueing occurs. As more I/Os are queued on the HDDs, latency goes up. The impact may be very small on the raw devices, but the added overhead of the hypervisor and guest OS magnify it as seen here. The same behavior is apparent when we considered the storage bandwidth. Once we enhanced the S3200 array with SSDs and configured either read caching or tiering, the combined bandwidth of entire workload went up. SSD tiering saw the most improvement, 2.4 times the HDD-only baseline, to nearly 130 MB/s while response times dropped by 70% to roughly 2 milliseconds (Figures 2 and 3). Read caching saw more modest gains, but still provided measurable bandwidth and response time improvements. Figure 5- Application bandwidths As with latency, the SQL Server workload again saw the greatest benefit (Figure 5), with application bandwidth increasing from 12 MB/s to 39 MB/s to 88MB/s with read caching and tiering respectively. This allowed 196 database transactions per second with only HDDs, 409 transactions per second through read caching, and 900 transactions per second with tiering. This very significant improvement, while the other applications remained steady, also points to the HDD-only configuration imposing I/O limits on the SQL Server
9 Page 9 of 22 application that were not experienced by the others. The Jetstress, Sharepoint, and fileserver applications appear to have been satisfied by the array without additional acceleration, leaving SQL Server to reap the benefits of the flash upgrades.
10 Summary and Conclusion Lenovo S3200 with a Mixed Application Workload Page 10 of 22 Consolidation of workloads into a virtualized environment can drive up the return on investment for computing hardware, but it needs to be approached with a strong understanding of the workload I/O demands. Different businesses will have different requirements, which may change over time. A flexible solution is needed to address this. Lenovo s S3200 offers three solutions all-hdd, SSD read caching, and SSD performance tiering--in one storage array, and the amount of flash to deploy is the customer s prerogative. So long as the business SLA expectations are met, a solution can generally be considered appropriate for the use case. Using our workload as an example, we declared upfront that Exchange Jetstress thresholds had to be met for the storage to be validated. This condition was satisfied in all three configurations. However, combining applications that compete for storage resources can be punishing to a drive array and we saw that our database was suffering from high I/O latencies as a result. When we enabled flash acceleration, database storage bandwidths improved dramatically, by a factor of 3.5 when read caching and a factor of more than 7 with SSD tiering. While the database application was experiencing such significant improvement, the remaining application workloads carried on with no performance degradation. SSD performance tiering is clearly the stronger solution for our test case. A business with a different set of applications might find read caching a better choice if their I/O needs included a different read profile with potential hotspots or frequently accessed data. The great strength of the S3200 array is that it is easily configured for either option, and the number of SSDs can be chosen to fit a business specific needs. There is also a cost savings to consider. An all HDD solution would have required 48 drives to duplicate the performance of 20 HDDs and 4 SSDs configured for tiering. 1 That is another entire drive shelf, with all the associated costs for purchase, deployment, and support. A successful business is not likely to see application usage go down over time and wise IT management will consider anticipated storage growth and performance needs when 1 With 20 HDDs and four rather small SSDs configured for tiering, aggregate performance increased 2.4 times (bandwidth and IOPS). If the relationship of spindles to performance remains linear, another 28 HDDS would be needed to achieve the same performance values as with SSD tiering. (i.e.,20 HDDs x 2.4 = 48 HDDs)
11 Page 11 of 22 planning purchases and upgrades. The Lenovo S3200 provides the benefits of flash storage, to support current needs and to future-proof the enterprise, without the expense of an all-flash array or the inconvenience and waste of short-stroking multiple HDD shelves to achieve the performance demanded.
12 Appendix A Test Description and Environment Lenovo S3200 with a Mixed Application Workload Page 12 of 22 Figure 6 Test Environment Server Dual processor rack server 2 Intel E GHz CPUs 144 GB RAM 1 16Gb FC dual port HBA 1 Intel x540-at2 10Gb NIC vsphere 5.5 Microsoft Exchange Jetstress 2013, Microsoft Exchange 2013 ESE files
13 Page 13 of 22 VMs Active Directory o Windows 2012 R2, 8GB RAM, 4 cores Exchange Jetstress o Windows 2012 R2, 8GB RAM, 8 cores, MS Exchange Jetstress 2013 SQL Server o Windows 2012 R2, 16GB RAM, 8 cores, SQL Server 2012 SP2, MS TPC-E SMB Fileserver o Windows 2012 R2, 6GB RAM, 2 cores SharePoint o Windows 2012 R2, 8GB RAM 8 cores, SharePoint 2013 Webserver o Ubuntu , 2GB RAM, 2 cores, NGINX Webserver vcenter Server o Windows 2008 R2, 8GB RAM, 4 cores Fibre Channel Switch Brocade Gb Fibre Channel Switch Storage Array Lenovo S3200 array Lenovo SAN Manager Storage Operating System GB 10k RPM 6Gb SAS HDD 10 drive RAID 6 per storage controller 550 GB volume for VM files datastore on controller GB volume for application datastore on controller GB volume for application datastore on controller GB SSD 1 drive per storage controller for read caching 2 drives RAID 1 per storage controller for SSD tiering 4 16Gb FC target ports per controller (1 port active per controller)
14 Appendix B Array Volume Configuration Lenovo S3200 with a Mixed Application Workload Page 14 of 22 Figure 7 - Array and vsphere volume and datastore configuration
15 Appendix C Workload definitions Exchange Workload Lenovo S3200 with a Mixed Application Workload Page 15 of 22 We installed Microsoft Exchange Jetstress 2013 to simulate an Exchange server. While not a true mail server, Jetstress models the I/O loading and patterns that would be generated by an Exchange 2013 server, including database reads and writes as well as logging. Its configuration includes the number and size of mailboxes, number of mailbox databases and logs, and intensity of use, among other things. Jetstress uses the same Extensible Storage Engine files as Microsoft Exchange to ensure that Jetstress modelled performance is representative of a bona fide Exchange Server of the same version. We configured 250 mailboxes and 6 mailbox databases with a single replica each. Every mailbox was allowed up to 2 GB of space. The workload was configured to use all the available drive space equally, which can be cache unfriendly. Jetstress was used as the primary benchmark by which we determined whether the storage was able to support our multiple workload environment. If Jetstress could not certify the storage for an average mail server load (.2 IOPS per mailbox for Exchange 2013) we would declare the multiple workloads to be too much for the storage array. Jetstress certifies that an environment is able to support a configuration when average database latencies are below 20 milliseconds. SQL Workload SQL Server 2012 SP2 was installed to support a transactional database workload. For the workload itself, we chose the Transaction Performance Council benchmark E (TPC-E). This benchmark performs real transactions that might be executed by database application users as well as background transactions from automated processes. TPC-E is a variation of an On-Line Transaction Processing (OLTP) workload that models a financial brokerage firm with customers who generate transactions related to trades, account inquiries, and market research. The brokerage firm in turn interacts with financial markets to execute orders on behalf of the customers and updates relevant account information. This workload consists of a mixture of mostly reads with some writes to its database. The database was built with 1TB of data and logs. For our hypothetical business, we assumed that 10 users might be simultaneously accessing this application at any one time. It was not our intention to benchmark a database system and report TPC-E scores to the Transaction Performance Council. The data gathered by this testing is significant to this evaluation only and cannot be compared with other TPC-E results.
16 Page 16 of 22 Microsoft SharePoint Workload Microsoft SharePoint is a common workspace collaboration tool, accessed through a browser from a variety of client devices. We assumed a sixth of our hypothetical company, 25 users, would be simultaneously using SharePoint. With Neotys NeoLoad web performance testing tools, we created a workload that included general navigation of the collaboration space plus uploads and downloads of files. Many of the users were assumed to be accessing and updating related documents, as project teams would do in real-life. Web Workload Using the NGINX open source webserver software and an Ubuntu server virtual machine, we deployed a read-only webserver. Twenty five client device connections were maintained at all times, hitting web pages in a semi-random fashion, using the Neotys NeoLoad web performance testing tools to drive the demand. Fileserver workload A basic Windows SMB network share of 1TB was used to create a network fileshare. A server outside of the test environment executed an Iometer script against the network drive. 12 workers ran Iometer access specifications performing 4KB and 8KB random and sequential I/O. A 10 Gb/s Ethernet connection was deployed between the client and fileserver VM. We simulated hotspots where several users would perform the same I/O across the same limited portion of the virtual drive, mimicking how certain files tend to be accessed more regularly than others in normal operations.
17 Appendix D Fileserver Iometer test file Lenovo S3200 with a Mixed Application Workload Page 17 of 22 Version 'TEST SETUP ==================================================================== 'Test Description 'Run Time ' hours minutes seconds 'Ramp Up Time (s) 0 'Default Disk Workers to Spawn NUMBER_OF_CPUS 'Default Network Workers to Spawn 0 'Record Results ALL Cycling ' start step step type 1 1 LINEAR 'Disk Cycling ' start step step type 1 1 LINEAR 'Queue Depth Cycling ' start end step step type EXPONENTIAL 'Test Type NORMAL 'END test setup 'RESULTS DISPLAY =============================================================== 'Record Last Update Results,Update Frequency,Update Type DISABLED,1,WHOLE_TEST 'Bar chart 1 statistic Total I/Os per Second 'Bar chart 2 statistic Total MBs per Second (Decimal) 'Bar chart 3 statistic Average I/O Response Time (ms) 'Bar chart 4 statistic Maximum I/O Response Time (ms) 'Bar chart 5 statistic % CPU Utilization (total) 'Bar chart 6 statistic Total Error Count 'END results display 'ACCESS SPECIFICATIONS ========================================================= 'Access specification name,default assignment 4 KiB; 100% Read; 25% random,none 'size,% of size,% reads,% random,delay,burst,align,reply 4096,100,100,25,0,1,0,0 'Access specification name,default assignment 4 KiB; 10% Read; 0% random,none 'size,% of size,% reads,% random,delay,burst,align,reply 4096,100,10,0,0,1,0,0 'Access specification name,default assignment 8 KiB; mixed; hotspots,none 'size,% of size,% reads,% random,delay,burst,align,reply 8192,10,100,10,0,1,0,0
18 Page 18 of ,10,0,10,0,1,0,0 8192,20,10,0,0,1,0,0 8192,60,100,10,0,1,0,0 'END access specifications 'MANAGER LIST ================================================================== 'Manager ID, manager name 1,WIN-08GAJTULK4J 'Manager network address Worker 1 0,0,1 4 KiB; 100% Read; 25% random assignments type assignments Worker 2 0,0,1 4 KiB; 100% Read; 25% random assignments type assignments Worker 3 0,0,1
19 Page 19 of 22 4 KiB; 100% Read; 25% random assignments type assignments Worker 4 0,0,1 4 KiB; 100% Read; 25% random assignments type assignments Worker 5 0,0,1 4 KiB; 10% Read; 0% random assignments type assignments Worker 6
20 Page 20 of 22 0,0,1 4 KiB; 10% Read; 0% random assignments type assignments Worker 7 0,0,1 4 KiB; 10% Read; 0% random assignments type assignments Worker 8 0,0,1 4 KiB; 10% Read; 0% random assignments type assignments Worker 9
21 Page 21 of ,0,1 8 KiB; mixed; hotspots assignments type assignments Worker ,0,1 8 KiB; mixed; hotspots assignments type assignments Worker ,0,1 8 KiB; mixed; hotspots assignments type assignments Worker 12
22 Page 22 of ,0,0 8 KiB; mixed; hotspots assignments type assignments 'End manager 'END manager list Version The original version of this document is available at: on the Demartek website. Intel and Xeon are registered trademarks of Intel Corporation. Lenovo and S3200 are trademarks or registered trademarks of Lenovo Systems. Neotys and NeoLoad are registered trademarks of Neotys Corporation Microsoft, Windows, and Windows Server are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. TPC Benchmark and TPC-E are trademarks of the Transaction Performance Council. Demartek is a trademark of Demartek, LLC. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Evaluation Report: Supporting Microsoft Exchange on the Lenovo S3200 Hybrid Array Evaluation report prepared under contract with Lenovo Executive Summary Love it or hate it, businesses rely on email. It
Evaluation Report: Accelerating SQL Server Database Performance with the Lenovo Storage S3200 SAN Array Evaluation report prepared under contract with Lenovo Executive Summary Even with the price of flash
Analysis of VDI Storage Performance During Bootstorm Introduction Virtual desktops are gaining popularity as a more cost effective and more easily serviceable solution. The most resource-dependent process
Violin Memory 7300 Flash Storage Platform Supports Multiple Primary Storage Workloads Web server, SQL Server OLTP, Exchange Jetstress, and SharePoint Workloads Can Run Simultaneously on One Violin Memory
Optimizing SQL Server Storage Performance with the PowerEdge R720 Choosing the best storage solution for optimal database performance Luis Acosta Solutions Performance Analysis Group Joe Noyola Advanced
HP SN1000E 16 Gb Fibre Channel HBA Evaluation Evaluation report prepared under contract with Emulex Executive Summary The computing industry is experiencing an increasing demand for storage performance
Test Validation Comparison of Hybrid Flash Storage System Performance Author: Russ Fellows March 23, 2015 Enabling you to make the best technology decisions 2015 Evaluator Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
IOmark- VDI Nimbus Data Gemini Test Report: VDI- 130906- a Test Copyright 2010-2013 Evaluator Group, Inc. All rights reserved. IOmark- VDI, IOmark- VDI, VDI- IOmark, and IOmark are trademarks of Evaluator
Dell Compellent Storage Center SAN & VMware View 1,000 Desktop Reference Architecture Dell Compellent Product Specialist Team THIS WHITE PAPER IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, AND MAY CONTAIN TYPOGRAPHICAL
MS Exchange Server Acceleration Maximizing Users in a Virtualized Environment with Flash-Powered Consolidation Allon Cohen, PhD OCZ Technology Group Introduction Microsoft (MS) Exchange Server is one of
Evaluation Report: Database Acceleration with HP 3PAR StoreServ 7450 All-flash Storage Evaluation report prepared under contract with HP Executive Summary Solid state storage is transforming the entire
White Paper Recording Server Virtualization Prepared by: Mike Sherwood, Senior Solutions Engineer Milestone Systems 23 March 2011 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Target audience and white paper purpose...
MS EXCHANGE SERVER ACCELERATION IN VMWARE ENVIRONMENTS WITH SANRAD VXL Dr. Allon Cohen Eli Ben Namer email@example.com 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SANRAD VXL provides enterprise class acceleration for virtualized
White Paper MS Exchange Server Acceleration Using virtualization to dramatically maximize user experience for Microsoft Exchange Server Allon Cohen, PhD Scott Harlin OCZ Storage Solutions, Inc. A Toshiba
Lab Evaluation of NetApp Hybrid Array with Flash Pool Technology Evaluation report prepared under contract with NetApp Introduction As flash storage options proliferate and become accepted in the enterprise,
Evaluation Report: HP Blade Server and HP MSA 16GFC Storage Evaluation Evaluation report prepared under contract with HP Executive Summary The computing industry is experiencing an increasing demand for
VMware Best Practice and Integration Guide Dot Hill Systems Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION Today s Data Centers are embracing Server Virtualization as a means to optimize hardware resources, energy resources,
Using Synology SSD Technology to Enhance System Performance Synology Inc. Synology_SSD_Cache_WP_ 20140512 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Enterprise Challenges and SSD Cache as Solution Enterprise Challenges...
Leveraging EMC Fully Automated Storage Tiering (FAST) and FAST Cache for SQL Server Enterprise Deployments Applied Technology Abstract This white paper introduces EMC s latest groundbreaking technologies,
Improving IT Operational Efficiency with a VMware vsphere Private Cloud on Lenovo Servers and Lenovo Storage SAN S3200 Most organizations routinely utilize a server virtualization infrastructure to benefit
Using Synology SSD Technology to Enhance System Performance Based on DSM 5.2 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Enterprise Challenges and SSD Cache as Solution Enterprise Challenges... 3 SSD Cache as Solution...
Best Practices for Optimizing SQL Server Database Performance with the LSI WarpDrive Acceleration Card Version 1.0 April 2011 DB15-000761-00 Revision History Version and Date Version 1.0, April 2011 Initial
Remote/Branch Office IT Consolidation with Lenovo S2200 SAN and Microsoft Hyper-V Most data centers routinely utilize virtualization and cloud technology to benefit from the massive cost savings and resource
EMC Unified Storage for Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Enabled by EMC CLARiiON and EMC FAST Cache Reference Copyright 2010 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Published October, 2010 EMC believes the information
Qsan Document - White Paper Performance Monitor Case Studies Version 1.0 November 2014 Copyright Copyright@2004~2014, Qsan Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced
Measuring Interface Latencies for SAS, Fibre Channel and iscsi Dennis Martin Demartek President Santa Clara, CA 1 Demartek Company Overview Industry analysis with on-site test lab Lab includes servers,
Monitoring Databases on VMware Ensure Optimum Performance with the Correct Metrics By Dean Richards, Manager, Sales Engineering Confio Software 4772 Walnut Street, Suite 100 Boulder, CO 80301 www.confio.com
Parallels Cloud Storage White Paper Performance Benchmark Results www.parallels.com Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Architecture Overview... 3 Key Features... 4 No Special Hardware Requirements...
VMware SAN Backup Using VMware vsphere Data Protection Advanced SEPTEMBER 2014 VMware SAN Backup Using VMware vsphere Table of Contents Introduction.... 3 vsphere Architectural Overview... 4 SAN Backup
A Diablo Technologies Whitepaper Diablo and VMware TM powering SQL Server TM in Virtual SAN TM May 2015 Ricky Trigalo, Director for Virtualization Solutions Architecture, Diablo Technologies Daniel Beveridge,
Using Synology SSD Technology to Enhance System Performance Synology Inc. Synology_WP_ 20121112 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Enterprise Challenges and SSD Cache as Solution Enterprise Challenges... 3 SSD
Spot server problems before they are noticed The system s really slow today! How often have you heard that? Finding the solution isn t so easy. The obvious questions to ask are why is it running slowly
IOmark-VM DotHill AssuredSAN Pro 5000 Test Report: VM- 130816-a Test Report Date: 16, August 2013 Copyright 2010-2013 Evaluator Group, Inc. All rights reserved. IOmark-VM, IOmark-VDI, VDI-IOmark, and IOmark
High Performance Tier Implementation Guideline A Dell Technical White Paper PowerVault MD32 and MD32i Storage Arrays THIS WHITE PAPER IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, AND MAY CONTAIN TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
MaxDeploy Ready Hyper- Converged Virtualization Solution With SanDisk Fusion iomemory products MaxDeploy Ready products are configured and tested for support with Maxta software- defined storage and with
Performance Advantages for Oracle Database At a Glance This Technical Brief illustrates that even for smaller online transaction processing (OLTP) databases, the Sun 8Gb/s Fibre Channel Host Bus Adapter
Storage I/O Control: Proportional Allocation of Shared Storage Resources Chethan Kumar Sr. Member of Technical Staff, R&D VMware, Inc. Outline The Problem Storage IO Control (SIOC) overview Technical Details
IOmark- VDI HP HP ConvergedSystem 242- HC StoreVirtual Test Report: VDI- HC- 150427- b Test Copyright 2010-2014 Evaluator Group, Inc. All rights reserved. IOmark- VDI, IOmark- VM, VDI- IOmark, and IOmark
Microsoft Exchange Server 3 Deployment Considerations for Small and Medium Businesses A Dell PowerEdge server can provide an effective platform for Microsoft Exchange Server 3. A team of Dell engineers
Technical white paper HP Smart Array Controllers and basic RAID performance factors Technology brief Table of contents Abstract 2 Benefits of drive arrays 2 Factors that affect performance 2 HP Smart Array
Test Validation Test Validation - SEP sesam Enterprise Backup Software Evaluation of Enterprise Data Protection using SEP Software Author:... Enabling you to make the best technology decisions Backup &
Directions for VMware Ready Testing for Application Software Introduction To be awarded the VMware ready logo for your product requires a modest amount of engineering work, assuming that the pre-requisites
High Performance SQL Server with Storage Center 6.4 All Flash Array Dell Storage November 2013 A Dell Compellent Technical White Paper Revisions Date November 2013 Description Initial release THIS WHITE
The Essential Guide to SQL Server Virtualization S p o n s o r e d b y Virtualization in the Enterprise Today most organizations understand the importance of implementing virtualization. Virtualization
VDI Without Compromise with SimpliVity OmniStack and Citrix XenDesktop Page 1 of 11 Introduction Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) provides customers with a more consistent end-user experience and excellent
Deep Dive on SimpliVity s OmniStack A Technical Whitepaper By Hans De Leenheer and Stephen Foskett August 2013 1 Introduction This paper is an in-depth look at OmniStack, the technology that powers SimpliVity
Dell Virtualization Solution for Microsoft SQL Server 2012 using PowerEdge R820 This white paper discusses the SQL server workload consolidation capabilities of Dell PowerEdge R820 using Virtualization.
White paper QNAP Turbo NAS with SSD Cache 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Audience... 3 Terminology... 3 SSD cache technology... 4 Applications and benefits... 5 Limitations... 6 Performance Test...
Express5800 Scalable Enterprise Server Reference Architecture For NEC PCIe SSD Appliance for Microsoft SQL Server An appliance that significantly improves performance of enterprise systems and large-scale
1 WWW.FUSIONIO.COM WHITE PAPER WHITE PAPER Executive Summary Fusion iovdi is the first desktop- aware solution to virtual desktop infrastructure. Its software- defined approach uniquely combines the economics
VMware Virtual SAN 6.0 Performance TECHNICAL WHITE PAPER Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Introduction... 3 Virtual SAN Cluster Setup... 3 Hybrid Virtual SAN Hardware Configuration... 4 All-Flash
How SSDs Fit in Different Data Center Applications Tahmid Rahman Senior Technical Marketing Engineer NVM Solutions Group Flash Memory Summit 2012 Santa Clara, CA 1 Agenda SSD market momentum and drivers
EMC XTREMIO EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW COMPANY BACKGROUND XtremIO develops enterprise data storage systems based completely on random access media such as flash solid-state drives (SSDs). By leveraging the underlying
Technical Paper Moving SAS Applications from a Physical to a Virtual VMware Environment Release Information Content Version: April 2015. Trademarks and Patents SAS Institute Inc., SAS Campus Drive, Cary,
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) made Easy HOW-TO Preface: Desktop virtualization can increase the effectiveness of information technology (IT) teams by simplifying how they configure and deploy endpoint
Pivot3 Reference Architecture for VMware View Version 1.03 January 2012 Table of Contents Test and Document History... 2 Test Goals... 3 Reference Architecture Design... 4 Design Overview... 4 The Pivot3
Best Practices for Monitoring Databases on VMware Dean Richards Senior DBA, Confio Software 1 Who Am I? 20+ Years in Oracle & SQL Server DBA and Developer Worked for Oracle Consulting Specialize in Performance
Intel Solid- State Drive Data Center P3700 Series NVMe Hybrid Storage Performance Hybrid Storage Performance Gains for IOPS and Bandwidth Utilizing Colfax Servers and Enmotus FuzeDrive Software NVMe Hybrid
Using Iometer to Show Acceleration Benefits for VMware vsphere 5.5 with FlashSoft Software 3.7 WHITE PAPER Western Digital Technologies, Inc. 951 SanDisk Drive, Milpitas, CA 95035 www.sandisk.com Table
Storage I/O Control Technical Overview and Considerations for Deployment VMware vsphere 4.1 T E C H N I C A L W H I T E P A P E R Executive Summary Storage I/O Control (SIOC) provides storage I/O performance
Hyperscale Use Cases for Scaling Out with Flash David Olszewski Business challenges Performanc e Requireme nts Storage Budget Balance the IT requirements How can you get the best of both worlds? SLA Optimized
Technical white paper HP ProLiant BL660c Gen9 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 technical brief Scale-up your Microsoft SQL Server environment to new heights Table of contents Executive summary... 2 Introduction...
BEST PRACTICES GUIDE Nimble Storage for VMware View VDI N I M B L E B E S T P R A C T I C E S G U I D E : N I M B L E S T O R A G E F O R V M W A R E V I E W V D I 1 Overview Virtualization is an important
Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Fast Track 34-TB Certified Data Warehouse 103-TB Maximum User Data Tegile Systems Solution Review 2U Design: Featuring Tegile T3800 All-Flash Storage Array http:// www.tegile.com/solutiuons/sql
Evaluating Storage Technologies for Virtual Server Environments Russ Fellows June, 2010 Technology Insight Series Evaluator Group Copyright 2010 Evaluator Group, Inc. All rights reserved Executive Summary
Nutanix Tech Note Configuration Best Practices for Nutanix Storage with VMware vsphere Nutanix Virtual Computing Platform is engineered from the ground up to provide enterprise-grade availability for critical
SMB Direct for SQL Server and Private Cloud Increased Performance, Higher Scalability and Extreme Resiliency June, 2014 Mellanox Overview Ticker: MLNX Leading provider of high-throughput, low-latency server
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS PAPER Marvell DragonFly Virtual Storage Accelerator Performance Benchmarks Arvind Pruthi Senior Staff Manager Marvell April 2011 www.marvell.com Overview In today s virtualized data
WHITE PAPER Optimizing Virtual Platform Disk Performance Think Faster. Visit us at Condusiv.com Optimizing Virtual Platform Disk Performance 1 The intensified demand for IT network efficiency and lower
Delivering SDS simplicity and extreme performance Real-World SDS implementation of getting most out of limited hardware Murat Karslioglu Director Storage Systems Nexenta Systems October 2013 1 Agenda Key
1) Disk performance When factoring in disk performance, one of the larger impacts on a VM is determined by the type of disk you opt to use for your VMs in Hyper-v manager/scvmm such as fixed vs dynamic.
Lab Validation Report Workload Performance Analysis: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 with Hyper-V and SQL Server 2012 Virtualizing Tier-1 Application Workloads with Confidence By Mike Leone, ESG Lab Engineer
Purchasing Department August 16, 2012 RFP-MM-1213-11067 Enterprise Storage Addendum 1 A. SPECIFICATION CLARIFICATIONS / REVISIONS NONE B. REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION Oracle: 1) What version of Oracle is in
Atlantis USX Hyper- Converged Solution for Microsoft SQL 2014 atlantiscomputing.com Table of Contents Executive Summary... 4 Solution Overview... 5 Atlantis USX and Microsoft SQL Architecture... 5 Microsoft
SSDs: Practical Ways to Accelerate Virtual Servers Session B-101, Increasing Storage Performance Andy Mills CEO Enmotus Santa Clara, CA November 2012 1 Summary Market and Technology Trends Virtual Servers