Administrative Guidelines for the Use of Electronic Signatures
|
|
|
- Valentine McDowell
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Administrative Guidelines for the Use of Electronic s I. Introduction II. Scope & Applicability III. Electronic Acceptance & Use IV. E- Approval V. Implementation and Security Procedures VI. Misuse of Abuse of Electronic s or s Appendixes A. Ink to E- Level of Assurance Versus Risk Matrix B. Glossary I. Introduction To potentially increase the efficiency of University business that requires authorization, the University of Alaska System (hereafter the University ) may require that members of the University community to accept and use electronic signatures (e-signatures) as part of an electronic transaction (e-transactions) to conduct business processes that previously required handwritten signatures and approvals on paper documents. It is the intent of this guidance that all internal University business units and processes will accept the use of e-signatures except in rare circumstances that require notarization, are prohibited by law, or when a heightened level of security and /or assurance is required as outlined in Section V. II. Scope & Applicability This administrative guide applies to all units of the University and all members of the University community. Members of the University community include students and employees, prospective students and employees, patients, business partners, and other individuals who are associated with the University. The University may require members of the University community to conduct university transactions electronically and formally acknowledge their agreement to University transactions in which they are parties by affixing an e-signature. III. Electronic Acceptance & Use A. The University accepts e-signatures as legally effective and enforceable consistent with Alaska Statute AS et seq., the Uniform Electronic s Act (UETA). Under Alaska law, electronic signatures are equivalent to handwritten signatures to signify an agreement wherever applicable. B. Parties external to the University community as described above in Section II; will be strongly encouraged to use e-signatures. Whether the parties agree to conduct a transaction by electronic means is determined from the context and surrounding circumstances, including the parties conduct.
2 C. E-signatures and the associated data to validate the e-signature are an integral part of a record. Electronically signed documents must follow the same record retention as those using wet signatures. The signature and means to verify it need to be maintained for the full records life cycle. D. The University s right or option to conduct a University transaction on paper or in nonelectronic form shall not affect the University s right, option, or obligation to have documents provided or made available in electronic format. E. The decision to use an e-signature should be weighed against the costs, complexity, and risk identified with the transaction. F. The University provided DocuSign is the preferred and supported e-signature method for the University other systems using electronic verification appear in section V. IV. E- Approval & Initialization It is the intent of this guidance that all university business units and processes will accept the use of e-signatures wherever a wet signature is currently acceptable; however, the University reserves the right to designate specific transactions that are not to be conducted using e- signatures. These exceptions shall be limited to those documents requiring the highest level of security or level 3 Assurance as outlined in section V below or are otherwise prohibited by law. A. For enterprise level transactions the appropriate vice-president in consultation with the Chief Information Technology Officer will determine if a document or process meets the criteria for exception. B. For internal campus-level transactions, the Chancellor or his/her designee will identify those documents that meet the criteria for exception. C. Units will review annually the e-signature exceptions based on risks, security levels, and methodologies. V. Implementation and Security Procedures A. Electronic signatures may be implemented using various methodologies depending on the risk tolerance and level of assurance required for the transaction, and all relevant state, federal, and university policies, regulations, and guidelines. Examples of transaction risks include fraud, integrity, non-repudiation, and financial loss. The quality and security of the electronic signature method shall be commensurate with the risk and needed assurance of the authenticity of the signer (See Appendix A - Ink to E- Level of Assurance Versus Risk Matrix). B. The University shall adopt security procedures for e-signatures that are practical, secure, and balance risk and cost.
3 C. The security requirements for a University transaction include, but are not limited to, password policies, secure transmission policies, access control policies and other relevant policies and regulations, as well as pertinent federal and state regulations. D. Levels of Security 1. Minimal level of security: a. General information found on a web site b. Any document accepted not requiring a signature is suitable for this level c. Any document whose disclosure that would not have an adverse impact on the University 2. Heightened level of security: a. An internal official business communication b. An internal approval that requires a signature c. Items that could have an adverse effect on the university, assets, or public interest 3. Highest level of security: a. The transaction would initiate an irreparable action b. Any transaction that would require a witnessed signature (notarized) in written form c. Where electronic signatures are prohibited by law E. Levels of Assurance for Authenticity (See Appendix A-Institutional Risk Vs Level of Assurance Diagram) 1. Level 1 assurance of the authenticity. A level 1 assurance of authenticity corresponds to communications or information that do not require a signature or authentication. 2. Level 2 assurance of the authenticity. A level two assurance requires a UA-system single factor authentication against a trustworthy UA-system that provides assurance and reliability of the process. A level two assurance corresponds to a University provisioned e-signature such as DocuSign or an internal system Workflow. An example is the electronic time sheet process that relies on a banner workflow (UA trustworthy reliable process) along with employee and supervisor access to the system. 3. Level 3 Assurance. A level three assurance for authentication corresponds to a verified and witnessed signature in the presence of a notary to document title transfer, deed, or trust. F. Systems Utilizing Electronic Verification System Type of Banner (INB, SSB, & UAOnline) Password/login authentication OnBase Captured signatures and/or records processed via DocuSign Password/login authentication Cryptographic signatures and/or DocuSign processed attachments DocuSign Password/login authentication, multi-factor
4 VI. Misuse or Abuse of Electronic s and s Misuse or abuse of electronic signatures and transactions may violate Board of Regents Policy, University Regulation, and Office of Information Technology policies. Sanctions for misuse or abuse of electronic signatures and transactions may include disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment for employees and action under applicable Student Codes of Conduct for students, and criminal prosecution under applicable Federal and state laws.
5 Appendix A Ink to E- Level of Assurance Versus Risk Matrix Levels E-signature or Ink Type of s Risk Level 0 None None All other s Wet Required by Law or Regulation Governing not needed E- Required by Law or Regulation Governing not needed None Level 1 UA Domain access or not required Unwitnessed ink-signature or not required Standard business practices E-signature not recommended E-signature not required Minorsignificant can be absorbed Level 2 Level 3 Identity requires single factor authentication against a UA system Identity requires multistep or factor authentication Unwitnessed signature Verify with card Witnessed signature/ Notarized There is a need for Emphasizing Seriousness of There is a need to Bind a Party to specific intent Required by both parties (signer and approver) Witnessed Required/ Notarized Recommend E-signature Currently not available at UA Substantial warrants effort to recover loss Major irreparable action or damage
6 Appendix B - Glossary Authentication Authentication means the process of securely verifying the identity of an individual prior to allowing access to an electronic University service. Authentication ensures that the user who attempts to perform the function of an electronic signature is in fact who they say they are and is authorized to sign. Authorization Authorization means verifying that an authenticated user has permission to access specific electronic University services and/or perform certain operations. Electronic Electronic means a technology that has electrical, digital, magnetic, wireless, optical or electromagnetic capabilities or similar capabilities. Electronic record or e-record Electronic record or e-record means a record of information that is created, generated, sent, communicated, received or stored electronically. Electronic signature or e-signature Electronic signature or e-signature means an electronic sound, symbol or process that is attached to or logically associated with a record and that is executed or adopted with the intent to sign the record. Electronic transaction or e-transaction Electronic transaction or e-transaction means an action or set of actions that is conducted or performed, in whole or in part, electronically or via electronic records. Information Information means data, text, images, sounds, codes, computer programs, software, databases or similar items. Non-Repudiation Non-Repudiation means the inability of either party in a voluntary transaction to reject, disown, or disclaim the validity of that transaction. Record Record means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and that is retrievable in perceivable form made or received by the university that is evidence of its operations, and has value requiring its retention for specific period of time. Recorded information, regardless of medium or characteristics, made or received by the university that is evidence of its operations, and has value requiring its retention for a specific period of time.
7 [State of Alaska Records Definition AS sect (6)] Record means any document, paper, book, letter, drawing, map, plat, photo, photographic file, motion picture film, microfilm, microphotograph, exhibit, magnetic or paper tape, punched card, electronic record, or other document of any other material, regardless of physical form or characteristic, developed or received under law or in connection with the transaction of official business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by an agency or a political subdivision, as evidence of the organization, function, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the state or political subdivision or because of the informational value in them; the term does not include library and museum material developed or acquired and preserved solely for reference, historical or exhibitions purposes, extra copies of documents preserved solely for convenience of reference, or stocks of publications and processed documents. Repudiation Repudiation means the willful act of either party in a voluntary transaction to reject, disown, or disclaim the validity of that transaction. Security Procedure Security Procedure means a procedure that is used to verify that an electronic signature, record, or performance is that of a specific person; to determine that the person is authorized to sign the document; and, to detect changes or errors in the information in an electronic record. This includes a procedure that requires the use of algorithms or other codes, identifying words or numbers or encryption, callback or other acknowledgment procedures. means an action or set of actions occurring between two (2) or more persons relating to the conduct of business, commercial, or governmental affairs. Unit Unit means the University organization conducting business by means of an e-signature such as a college, department, auxiliary, or administrative division. University A University means a transaction conducted in support of the University s teaching, service mission, research, or administration missions.
California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA)
Page 1 of 8 California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) California Civil Code, Division 3, Part 2, Title 5 Cal. Civ. Code 1633.1 1633.17 1633. This title may be cited as the Uniform Electronic
59.1-479. Title. This chapter may be cited as the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act." TOC
59.1-479. Title. 59.1-480. Definitions. 59.1-481. Scope. 59.1-482. Prospective application. 59.1-483. Use of electronic records and electronic signatures; variation by agreement. 59.1-484. Construction
Montana Code Annotated 2011 Title 30, chapter 18, part 1 Electronic Signatures
Montana Code Annotated 2011 Title 30, chapter 18, part 1 Electronic Signatures Act". 30-18-101. Short title. This part may be cited as the "Uniform Electronic Transactions 30-18-102. Definitions. In this
PENNSYLVANIA STATUTES TITLE 73. TRADE AND COMMERCE CHAPTER 41. REGULATORY ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS CHAPTER 1. PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS
Page 1 2260.101. Short title PENNSYLVANIA STATUTES TITLE 73. TRADE AND COMMERCE CHAPTER 41. REGULATORY ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS CHAPTER 1. PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS (a) GENERAL.-- This act shall be known and
NEW MEXICO STATUTES ANNOTATED CHAPTER 14. RECORDS, LEGAL NOTICES AND OATHS ARTICLE 9A. UNIFORM REAL PROPERTY ELECTRONIC RECORDING ACT
NEW MEXICO STATUTES ANNOTATED CHAPTER 14. RECORDS, LEGAL NOTICES AND OATHS ARTICLE 9A. UNIFORM REAL PROPERTY ELECTRONIC RECORDING ACT 14-9A-1. SHORT TITLE.--This act may be cited as the Uniform Real Property
CHAPTER 6. UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT
Disclaimer This statutory database is current through the 2005 Regular Session of the South Carolina General Assembly. Changes to the statutes enacted by the 2006 General Assembly, which will convene in
State of Arkansas Policy Statement on the Use of Electronic Signatures by State Agencies June 2008
State of Arkansas Policy Statement on the Use of Electronic Signatures by State Agencies June 2008 Background In the last ten years Arkansas has enacted several laws to facilitate electronic transactions
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System Procedures Chapter 5 Administration Procedures associated with Board Policy 5.22
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System Procedures Chapter 5 Administration Procedures associated with Board Policy 5.22 5.25.1 Use of Electronic Part 1. Purpose. This procedure establishes requirements
AN ACT RELATING TO ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS; ENACTING THE UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT; ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE
AN ACT RELATING TO ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS; ENACTING THE UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT; ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN TRANSACTIONS. BE IT ENACTED
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System Guideline Chapter 5 Administration
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System Guideline Chapter 5 Administration Appropriate Use and Implementation of Electronic Part 1. Purpose. To establish requirements and responsibilities for
Best Practices Electronic Signature Requirements January 20, 2014
Best Practices Electronic Signature Requirements January 20, 2014 ALABAMA ARIZONA None CONNECTICUT DELAWARE FLORIDA Recorders are only required to accept electronic signatures that they have the technology
University of Louisiana System
Policy Number: M-17 University of Louisiana System Title: RECORDS RETENTION & Effective Date: OCTOBER 10, 2012 Cancellation: None Chapter: Miscellaneous Policy and Procedures Memorandum Each institution
New York State Electronic Signatures and Records Act
PIANY Doc. No. 31174 New York State Electronic Signatures and Records Act The information contained within this Resource kit was made available by the New York State Department of State Division of Administrative
APGO GUIDANCE ON DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATION. Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction Table of Contents 2.0 Document Authentication: The Basics 2.1 The Purpose of the Seal 2.2 The Practice of Authentication 3.0 Document Authentication: Application 3.1 The Authentication
Moving Towards an Electronic Real Estate Transaction
Moving Towards an Electronic Real Estate Transaction The Electronic Signature Legal Overview (U.S.) August 2010 1 Introduction Every real estate transaction involves the parties to the transaction putting
NC General Statutes - Chapter 66 Article 40 1
Article 40. Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. 66-311. Short title. This Article may be cited as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. (2000-152, s. 1.) 66-312. Definitions. As used in this Article,
CHAPTER 116. C.12A:12-1 Short title. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act."
CHAPTER 116 AN ACT creating the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act;" supplementing Title 12A of the New Jersey Statutes and repealing R.S.1:1-2.4. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of
City of Minneapolis Policy for Enterprise Information Management
City of Minneapolis Policy for Enterprise Information Management Origin: Developed by the City Clerk s Office and Business Information Services. Based on requirements set forth in Federal and State regulations
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN ELECTRONIC STUDENT LOAN TRANSACTIONS April 30, 2001 (Revised as of July 25, 2001) PURPOSE This document establishes standards regarding
Authentication of Documents. Use of Professional Seals
Authentication of Documents Use of Professional Seals Table of Contents Introduction 1 Definitions 2 1 Concepts and Principles of Authentication 4 1.1 Principles 4 1.2 Purpose of the Seal 4 1.3 Obtaining
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE. NASD Rules 3010(d) and 3110(c)(1)(C) SEC Rule 17a-4 15 USC 7001 et. seq. (E-SIGN)
C O M P L I A N C E G U I D E ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE NASD Rules 3010(d) and 3110(c)(1)(C) SEC Rule 17a-4 15 USC 7001 et. seq. (E-SIGN) ALPHATRUST PRONTO ENTERPRISE PLATFORM This compliance
5 FAM 140 ACCEPTABILITY AND USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
5 FAM 140 ACCEPTABILITY AND USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES 5 FAM 141 PURPOSE (CT-IM-112; 07-30-2010) (Office of Origin: IRM/OPS/ITI/SI/IIB) The purpose of this FAM chapter is to enable the Department to
IC 26-2-8-101 Sec. 101. IC 26-2-8 may be cited as the Unifonn Electronic Transactions Act. As added by P.L. 62-2000. SEC.l.
Indiana Code 26-2-8 Page 1 of 7 IC 26-2-8 Chapter 8. Uniform Electronic Transactions Act IC 26-2-8-101 Sec. 101. IC 26-2-8 may be cited as the Unifonn Electronic Transactions Act. As added by P.L. 62-2000.
Authentication of Documents/Use of Professional Stamps
Authentication of Documents/Use of Professional Stamps 1 Introduction The intention of this guideline is to amplify and clarify requirements for authentication of documents and use of the stamp, based
Digital Signatures For Engineering Documents
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Technical Services Traffic-Roadway Section Geometronics Unit 200 Hawthorne Avenue S.E. Suite B250 Salem, OR 97310 (503) 986-3103 Ron Singh, PLS Geometronics Manager
Issues to Address: The Privacy Concerns of Individuals
July 21, 2009 The Honorable Michael J. Astrue Commissioner Social Security Administration 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235-7703 Dear Mike: As you requested, the ABA explored the issues related
AUTHENTICATION STANDARDS FOR THE USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS JANUARY 8, 2008
AUTHENTICATION STANDARDS FOR THE USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS JANUARY 8, 2008 Produced by the Electronic Signatures Work Group of the Standards Subcommittee of the Supreme Court
Department of Veterans Affairs VA DIRECTIVE 6510 VA IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT
Department of Veterans Affairs VA DIRECTIVE 6510 Washington, DC 20420 Transmittal Sheet VA IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT 1. REASON FOR ISSUE: This Directive defines the policy and responsibilities to
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS FOR LENDERS
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS FOR LENDERS June 2015 Purpose The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (ESIGN) Act (15 U.S.C. 7001-7006), enacted in 2000, permits, but does not require,
THE MICHIGAN ELECTRONIC RECORDS STANDARDS
THE MICHIGAN ELECTRONIC RECORDS STANDARDS ADOPTED BY THE MICHIGAN ELECTRONIC RECORDING COMMISSION ESTABLISHED UNDER THE MICHIGAN UNIFORM REAL PROPERTY ELECTRONIC RECORDING ACT Effective January 1, 2014
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES Sarah McGee Assistant General Counsel Jim Nelson Security Risk Analyst Kathy Hanon System Office Budget Director The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity
Electronic Signature, Attestation, and Authorship
Electronic Signature, Attestation, and Authorship Appendix C: Electronic Signature Model Policy This template document is not intended for adoption as a substitute for a customized organizational policy
1 L.R.O. 2001 Electronic Transactions CAP. 308B ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS
1 L.R.O. 2001 Electronic Transactions CAP. 308B CHAPTER 308B ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION PART I Preliminary 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Non-application of Parts II
Electronic Signature Recordkeeping Guidelines
Electronic Signature Recordkeeping Guidelines Summary E-government and e-services change the way state and local government agencies conduct business. In a paper environment, a hand signature, also known
Digital Signature Policy Guidelines. Version 1.1. March 2014. Contains corrected links to documents
Office of State Controller, and the North Carolina Department of the Secretary of State, and North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Division of Archives and Records Digital Signature Policy Guidelines
State of Arizona Policy Authority Office of the Secretary of State
SIGNATURE DYNAMICS ELECTRONIC SIGNING POLICY for electronic signature use version as of April 25, 2001 the current version may be found at http://www.sos.state.az.us/pa/default.htm State of Arizona Policy
SUBJECT: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES I. PURPOSE
Page 1 of 8 I. PURPOSE To outline the University's policies for students, faculty, staff and others, concerning the use of the University's computing and communication resources, including those dealing
The Virginia Electronic Notarization Assurance Standard
The Virginia Electronic Notarization Assurance Standard Published by Secretary of the Commonwealth Richmond, Virginia January 1, 01 Version 1.0 Table of Contents Scope and Intent... 1 Definitions... Article
Arkansas Department of Information Systems Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration
Arkansas Department of Information Systems Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration Title: Electronic Signature Standard Document Number: SS 70 011 Effective Date: Act 722 of 2007 requires state
Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of Louisiana 9818 Bluebonnet Boulevard Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70810 www.iiabl.
Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of Louisiana 9818 Bluebonnet Boulevard Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70810 www.iiabl.com (225) 819-8007 Technical Advisory TA 305 November 15, 2012 Subject: Guidelines for
Electronic and Digital Signatures
Summary The advent of e-government and e-services has changed the way state agencies and local government offices do business. As a result, electronic systems and processes have become as important as
POLICY ISSUES IN E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS: ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE. 15 USC 7001 et. seq. (E-SIGN) and
W H I T E P A P E R POLICY ISSUES IN E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS: ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE 15 USC 7001 et. seq. (E-SIGN) and Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) ALPHATRUST PRONTO ENTERPRISE
Electronic Signature: Increasing the Speed and Efficiency of Commercial Transactions
Electronic Signature: Increasing the Speed and Efficiency of Commercial Transactions Signatures make the world go round. In other words, we need to commit and receive commitments from others in order make
RECORDS COMMISSION[671]
IAC 7/2/08 Records Commission[671] Analysis, p.1 RECORDS COMMISSION[671] CHAPTER 1 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1(17A,305) Description of organization 1.2(305) Definitions 1.3(17A,305) Responsibilities
[Brought into force by appointed day notice on 16 th June 2003.]
[Brought into force by appointed day notice on 16 th June 2003.] AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE LEGAL RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC WRITING, ELECTRONIC CONTRACTS, ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND ORIGINAL INFORMATION
CITY OF SAN DIEGO ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION Number 95.51 PAYMENT CARD INDUSTRY (PCI) COMPLIANCE POLICY. Page 1 of 9.
95.5 of 9. PURPOSE.. To establish a policy that outlines the requirements for compliance to the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI-DSS). Compliance with this standard is a condition of
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN GLOBAL AND NATIONAL COMMERCE ACT
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN GLOBAL AND NATIONAL COMMERCE ACT By John S. Stolz and John D. Cromie 2001 American Bar Association. Reprinted with permission On October 1, 2000, the United States took a substantial
CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5810. Chapter 72, Laws of 2015. 64th Legislature 2015 Regular Session
CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL Chapter, Laws of 1 th Legislature 1 Regular Session ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES EFFECTIVE DATE: //1 Passed by the Senate March, 1 Yeas Nays 1 BRAD
Policy for the Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources
Policy for the Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources Purpose... 1 Scope... 1 Definitions... 1 Compliance... 2 Limitations... 2 User Accounts... 3 Ownership... 3 Privacy... 3 Data Security...
ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS A Board Interpretative Guideline
STATE OF WASHINGTON BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS P.O BOX 9025 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTION 98507 June 30, 2015 ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS A Board Interpretative Guideline To help
FINAL May 2005. Guideline on Security Systems for Safeguarding Customer Information
FINAL May 2005 Guideline on Security Systems for Safeguarding Customer Information Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of Guideline 1 2 Definitions 2 3 Internal Controls and Procedures 2 3.1
Tell us how much to withdraw from this Account. Write a specific amount or ALL next to each Investment Option.
Withdrawal Request Form Use this form to withdraw assets from the Plan Questions? Call toll-free 1-877-338-4646 P.O. Box 55134, Boston, MA 02205-5134 Visit www.mnsaves.org Complete a separate form for
White Paper. The E-Sign Act. Use and enforceability of identifiers, passwords and personal identification numbers as signatures
White Paper The E-Sign Act Use and enforceability of identifiers, passwords and personal identification numbers as signatures 1 Table of Contents Introduction 2 The Audit Confirmation Process 2 The Confirm
Article. Robust Signature Capture Using SigPlus Software. Copyright Topaz Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
Article Robust Signature Capture Using SigPlus Software Copyright Topaz Systems Inc. All rights reserved. For Topaz Systems, Inc. trademarks and patents, visit www.topazsystems.com/legal. Table of Contents
Electronic Signature Article
Electronic Signature Article ESIGN Electronic Commerce and Electronic Signature Law Clarified Copyright Topaz Systems Inc. All rights reserved. For Topaz Systems, Inc. trademarks and patents, visit www.topazsystems.com/legal.
JUDICIARY OF GUAM ELECTRONIC FILING RULES 1
1 1 Adopted by the Supreme Court of Guam pursuant to Promulgation Order No. 15-001-01 (Oct. 2, 2015). TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION I - AUTHORITY AND SCOPE Page EFR 1.1. Electronic Document Management System.
erecording Best Practices for Recorders
2501 Aerial Center Parkway, Suite 103, Morrisville, NC 27560 919.459.2081 erecording Best Practices for Recorders Adopted by the PRIA Board on, 2015 http://www.pria.us PRIA Copyright Notice, Disclaimer
NYS BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINE G04-001
NYS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICIES, STANDARDS & GUIDELINES NYS BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINE G04-001 Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ESRA) Guidelines Issue Date: May 26, 2004 (Revised September 28, 2007)
REVISED UNIFORM FIDUCIARY ACCESS TO DIGITAL ASSETS ACT (2015)
FOR APPROVAL REVISED UNIFORM FIDUCIARY ACCESS TO DIGITAL ASSETS ACT (2015) NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS MEETING IN ITS ONE-HUNDRED-AND-TWENTY-FOURTH YEAR WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA
ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT 1999 BERMUDA 1999 : 26 ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT 1999
BERMUDA 1999 : 26 ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT 1999 [Date of Assent 5 August 1999] [Operative Date 4 October 1999] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1 Citation PART I PRELIMINARY 2 Definitions 3 Crown to be bound
COMPUTER MISUSE AND CYBERCRIME ACT
COMPUTER MISUSE AND CYBERCRIME ACT Act 22 of 2003 9 August 2003 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Short title 2. Interpretation PART I PRELIMINARY PART II OFFENCES 3. Unauthorised access to computer data 4. Access
Guidelines for the use of electronic signature
Republic of Albania National Authority for Electronic Certification Guidelines for the use of electronic signature Guide Nr. 001 September 2011 Version 1.3 Guidelines for the use of electronic signature
LAWS OF BRUNEI CHAPTER 196 ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT
CHAPTER 196 ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT S 93/00 REVISED EDITION 2008 B.L.R.O. 4/2008 Electronic Transactions 1 2008 Ed. CAP. 196 LAWS OF BRUNEI REVISED EDITION 2007 CHAPTER 197 ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS
BERMUDA ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT 1999 1999 : 26
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT 1999 1999 : 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Citation Definitions Crown to be bound Objects Regulatory policy
Electronic And Digital Signatures
Electronic And Digital Signatures Summary The advent of e-government and e-services is changing the way we do business. Traditionally, we created records on paper and we authenticated a record by signing
FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION INTERNET AND E-MAIL USAGE POLICY
FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION INTERNET AND E-MAIL USAGE POLICY Effective August 24, 2004 Overview: The Fresno County Employees Retirement Association (FCERA) provides access to the Internet
The Electronic Transactions Law Chapter I Title and Definition
The Union of Myanmar The State Peace and Development Council The Electronic Transactions Law ( The State Peace and Development Council Law No. 5/2004 ) The 12th Waxing of Kason 1366 M.E. (30th April, 2004)
Federal Trade Commission Privacy Impact Assessment
Federal Trade Commission Privacy Impact Assessment for the: W120023 ONLINE FAX SERVICE December 2012 1 System Overview The Federal Trade Commission (FTC, Commission or the agency) is an independent federal
Electronic Signature Guidelines
Electronic Signature Guidelines v 1.0, April 2016 Table of Contents Purpose 1 Background 2 These Guidelines 3 Determining the Need for a Signature 3 Definitions and Characteristics of an Electronic Signature
Electronic Records Management Guidelines
Electronic Records Management Guidelines Contents Section 1: Authority... 1 Section 2: Purpose and Scope... 1 Section 3: Records Custodian Responsibilities... 2 Section 4: Information Systems that produce,
Electronic Signatures: A New Opportunity for Growth. May 10, 2005
Electronic Signatures: A New Opportunity for Growth May 10, 2005 1 Contents Is It Legal? 3 E-Signature Technology 12 Another Industry Example 15 National Association for Variable Annuities Applications
CHAPTER 2016-46. Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 494
CHAPTER 2016-46 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 494 An act relating to digital assets; providing a directive to the Division of Law Revision and Information; creating
