Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 17
|
|
|
- Ada Boyd
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Ryan A. Hamilton NEVADA BAR NO. HAMILTON LAW S. Durango Dr., Ste. C Las Vegas, NV (0) - (0) - (fax) [email protected] Attorney for the plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA CHARIS YATES, a Washington Citizen; BERET PUGH, a Washington Citizen; and DEAN PUGH, a Washington Citizen, vs. Plaintiffs, NARCONON FRESH START d/b/a RAINBOW CANYON RETREAT, a California Corporation; ASSOCIATION FOR BETTER LIVING AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL; NARCONON INTERNATIONAL; and DOES -0, ROE Corporations I X, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND 0 Plaintiffs Charis Yates, Beret Pugh, and Dean Pugh ( Plaintiffs ), allege, by and through their attorney, Ryan Hamilton of Hamilton Law, LLC, the following: I. PARTIES. Plaintiffs are, and at all relevant times to this Complaint were, citizens of Washington.. Defendant Narconon Fresh Start is, and at all times relevant to this Complaint was, a corporation incorporated under the laws of, and with its principal place of business in, the State of
2 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 California. Fresh Start has been at all relevant times transacting business in Caliente, Lincoln County, Nevada. Fresh Start may be served with process through its registered agent, Mark Kirwin, 0 Market St., Ste. 0, Ventura, CA 00.. Defendant Narconon International ( NI ) is a California corporation with its headquarters in Los Angeles, California.. NI is the parent/licensor of Defendant Narconon Fresh Start. NI exercises control over the time, manner, and method of Fresh Start s operations.. NI was doing business in the State of Nevada by and through its agent and subsidiary/licensee Defendant Narconon Fresh Start. NI may be served with process through its registered agent, Sherman D. Lenske, 00 Canoga Ave., Suite, Woodland Hills, CA.. Fresh Start and NI are subsidiaries of the Association for Better Living and Education ( ABLE ). ABLE oversees the drug rehabilitation, education, and criminal justice activities of the Church of Scientology including, but not limited to, Fresh Start and NI.. Defendant ABLE is a corporation registered in the State of California with its headquarters in Los Angeles, California.. ABLE controls the time, manner, and method of NI s and Fresh Start s businesses by actively managing their daily operations, including conducting inspections of Narconon centers and creating, licensing, and approving their marketing materials.. ABLE transacts business in the State of Nevada by and through its agents, Narconon International and Narconon Fresh Start. ABLE may be served with process through its registered agent, Sherman D. Lenske, 00 Canoga Ave., Suite, Woodland Hills, CA.. Plaintiffs are unaware of the true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Defendant DOES -0, inclusive, and, therefore, sues these Defendants by fictitious names. Plaintiffs will seek leave of this Court to amend this Complaint when the identities of these Defendants are ascertained.
3 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This Court has subject jurisdiction pursuant to U.S.C.. The amount in controversy exceeds $,000.00, and there is complete diversity between the parties.. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to U.S.C. (a) because a substantial portion of the events and omissions giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in this District, and the Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the parties as alleged throughout this Complaint. III. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS. On or about August 0, 0, Plaintiffs Charis Yates and Dean Pugh were seeking substance abuse treatment for their daughter, Plaintiff Beret Pugh.. Dean spoke on the telephone with Dan Carmichael, Admissions Director for Fresh Start, about getting treatment for his daughter, Beret. Dean also spoke with another Fresh Start salesperson named Ryan.. During their conversations, Carmichael and Ryan made numerous material false representations of fact.. First, Carmichael and Ryan falsely represented to Dean that the Fresh Start treatment program has over a % percent success rate.. Second, Carmichael and Ryan falsely represented to Dean that at Fresh Start Beret would receive extensive substance abuse treatment and counseling from qualified counselors.. Third, Carmichael and Ryan falsely represented to Dean that the Fresh Start s sauna program, the New Life Detoxification program, would reduce or eliminate Beret s drug cravings by flushing residual drug toxins stored in her fatty tissue.
4 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Fourth, Carmichael and Ryan falsely represented to Dean that at Fresh Start Beret would be under the supervision of licensed medical professionals, including licensed physicians and nurses.. Fifth, Carmichael and Ryan falsely represented to Dean that the Fresh Start program was secular and did not involve the study or practice of any religion. 0. Based on these false representations, Plaintiffs Dean Pugh and Charis Yates decided to admit their daughter to the Fresh Start program. They paid $,000 to Fresh Start for treatment for Beret. The Contract and Invoice for Fresh Start s services are attached hereto as Exhibit A.. The Contract describes the founding of the Narconon program as follows: The Narconon Program was founded in by William Benitez, where it was first used in the Arizona State Prison, after being inspired by the practical betterment philosophy of author and humanitarian L. Ron Hubbard in the book, The Fundamentals of Thought.. The full title of the L. Ron Hubbard book referenced in the Contract is Scientology: The Fundamentals of Thought.. In the same paragraph, the Contract provides, The Narconon Program is secular (NON- RELIGIOUS) in nature and the program does not include in any participation in any religious studies of any kind.. Despite Fresh Start s representation that it is a secular program, Fresh Start had Beret unwittingly practicing and studying Scientology in place of counseling for substance abuse.. Fresh Start uses the Narconon treatment program.. The Narconon treatment program consists of eight books written by, or based on the works of, L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology.. The books in the Narconon treatment program teach Scientology doctrines and concepts. There is no apparent connection between the material in the Narconon books and treatment for substance abuse and addiction.
5 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. NI and ABLE license the written materials to individual Narconon centers such as Fresh Start.. NI and ABLE monitor and supervise the individual Narconon center s use of the Narconon books. 0. Individual Narconon centers such as Fresh Start must administer the Narconon program exactly as it is written or they risk losing their ability to administer the program.. Each patient at an individual Narconon center receives the same treatment program no matter what substance abuse problem the patient has.. Fresh Start administered Beret the Narconon treatment program.. The Narconon treatment program also has patients undergo a sauna program, what it calls the New Life Detoxification Program.. The sauna program is actually a Scientology ritual known as the Purification Rundown.. Under Narconon s sauna program, students first exercise vigorously before entering the sauna each day. On entering the sauna, Fresh Start requires each student to ingest increasing doses of Niacin and a vitamin bomb.. Fresh Start had Beret participate in the New Life Detoxification program. During her participation, Fresh Start had Beret ingest extreme doses of Niacin well beyond the recommended daily allowance.. There were no licensed medical personnel, such as doctors or nurses, supervising Beret as she participated in the sauna program.. Fresh Start claimed to Plaintiffs that the New Life Detoxification Program has been scientifically shown to flush out residual drug toxins stored in fatty tissue thereby reducing or eliminating a person s drug cravings.. Not only does the New Life Detoxification fail to live up to these claims about its benefits, the sauna program is dangerous. By having students ingest extreme doses of Niacin and other
6 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 vitamins while sitting in extreme temperatures for hours, the sauna program unnecessarily exposes students to serious health risks including severe dehydration. 0. In a prior lawsuit, Dr. Louis A. Casal, an expert retained by Narconon International and Narconon of Northern Georgia in a wrongful death suit filed against those entities, testified at a deposition. Relevant portions of Dr. Casal s deposition testimony are attached hereto as Exhibit B. When asked under oath about Narconon s sauna program, he testified that there is no scientific basis for the notion that sweating in a sauna detoxifies a person s body or treats addiction: Q. Have you looked at the Narconon literature on what Narconon contends the benefits from the sauna are? A. [Dr. Casal] Yes, I have. Q. And the sauna program, what Narconon contends is that in it in fact detoxifies your body. True? A. True. Q. But there s no scientific basis that you can point to to support that contention, is there, sir? A. You re correct. Q. So when Narconon states that the sauna program detoxifies its students, you re not aware, as a medical doctor, of any scientific basis for that contention? A. I agree. Exhibit B, Deposition of Dr. Louis Casal, : :.. Despite their own expert s admission that there is no scientific basis for the idea that patients sweating in the New Life Detoxification Program treats addiction, Defendants continue to represent to prospective patients, as they did to Plaintiffs, that the New Life Detoxification has been scientifically and medically proven as effective.
7 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Defendants represented to Plaintiffs that Fresh Start has a success rate of % for all Narconon centers, including Narconon Fresh Start d/b/a Rainbow Canyon Retreat. Defendants have published no studies or other verifiable evidence to support their claimed success rates.. Dr. Casal, the medical expert retained by Narconon International in another lawsuit, testified at his deposition that he was not convinced Narconon s claimed success rate was true: Q. Okay. What are you relying on well, let me ask you this; do you believe that percent success ratio is accurate? A. [Dr. Casal]. Mr. Harris, I ll be honest with you, that s a big number. Q. Yeah, it s it s a real big number. A. It s a big number. Q. And it s completely inconsistent A. I I hope it s true, but, I mean, I would need some convincing. Q. Okay. Do you have any idea where Narconon is getting the numbers that it s using? A. You know, in the interest of time I just didn t have enough time to delve deeper into those studies, Mr. Harris. And I I would be happy to, but, no, I don t have a clear understanding of where that 0 0-something number came from, no, sir. Exhibit B, Deposition of Dr. Louis Casal, : :; :.. Defendants are well aware that there is no support for Narconon s claimed success rate, but nonetheless advertised a % success rate to Plaintiffs.. Narconon documents indicate that the Narconon program is used to recruit patients into the Church of Scientology. For example, a Narconon document titled the Narconon Technical Line- Up provides a flow chart of a patient s experience into and through the Narconon program. The document shows that when a patient finishes the Narconon program, the patient is to be route[d] to the nearest Org for further services if the individual so desires. Org is Scientology jargon for
8 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 an individual church providing services for the Church of Scientology. A copy of the Narconon Technical Line-Up is attached hereto as Exhibit C.. Defendants consider the Narconon treatment program to be the Bridge to the Bridge. That is, Narconon considers its program to be an initial step into getting on Scientology s Bridge to Total Freedom, the key spiritual journey that practitioners of the Scientology religion undertake. See, e.g., Narconon News,, Volume, Issue : Narconon Is The Bridge to The Bridge, attached hereto as Exhibit D.. Despite Defendants representations that Beret would receive extensive counseling at Fresh Start, at no point did staff ever speak to her about the specifics of her drug use and its causes.. Beret did not receive any of the counseling or substance abuse treatment at Fresh Start that Plaintiffs had been promised. 0. In contrast to Defendants representations to Dean that Beret would be receiving treatment from duly qualified and licensed professionals, the staff at Fresh Start consisted almost entirely of former graduates of the Narconon program. These personnel were not licensed counselors, therapists, or addiction specialists.. Beret left Fresh Start early because she was not receiving any actual addiction treatment. She left Fresh Start much worse than when she entered and relapsed almost immediately. Plaintiffs have incurred expenses to get Beret the treatment Defendants promised to provide. Further, Beret has had to get help for the injuries Defendants treatment caused her. ALTER EGO LIABILITY. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set forth in the preceding paragraphs and further alleges as follows:. Defendants Narconon Fresh Start and NI have all appearances of being a corporate sham illusion and mere instrumentalities of Defendant ABLE.
9 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. ABLE heavily influences Narconon Fresh Start and NI and governs and controls nearly every aspect of their business activities.. There is such unity of interest and ownership among Narconon Fresh Start, NI, and ABLE that they are inseparable from one another.. The separate corporate existences of Narconon Fresh Start, NI, and ABLE is a design or scheme to perpetrate a fraud. The separate corporate existences of Narconon Fresh Start, NI, and ABLE is a scheme to fraudulently induce patients to enroll in one of their treatment facilities and pay substantial funds. Further, Defendants perpetrate this scheme to recruit for and promote the Scientology religion.. It is interests of justice to disregard the corporate shield and treat Defendants Narconon Fresh Start, NI, and ABLE as identical. Accordingly, each cause of action listed below is made against all Defendants. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF BREACH OF CONTRACT. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set. Plaintiffs and Defendants were bound by a Contract whereby Defendant agreed, in exchange for consideration, to provide secular, residential drug and alcohol treatment to Beret Pugh. 0. Defendants breached this contract by, inter alia: (i) failing to provide services constituting drug and alcohol treatment; and (ii) providing Scientology in lieu of drug and alcohol treatment.. Defendants breaches have caused Plaintiffs to suffer damages in excess of $, SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF FRAUD
10 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set. The following is a non-exhaustive list of false representations Defendants knowingly made to Plaintiffs: (i) that the Narconon Fresh Start program has a % success rate; (ii) that the Narconon program is secular and does not involve the study or practice of any religion; (iii) that Beret would receive counseling related to substance abuse at Fresh Start; (iv) that Fresh Start s sauna program, i.e, the Purification Rundown, is safe and has been scientifically proven as effective to reduce or eliminate drug cravings; and (v) that Beret would be under the care of licensed medical professionals, such as doctors or nurses, at Fresh Start.. Acting on behalf of Defendants, Dan Carmichael and Ryan of Fresh Start, made these statements to Dean Pugh on or about August 0, 0, to induce Dean and Charis to send their daughter to Fresh Start.. Had Plaintiffs known that any of the above representations Defendants made were false, they would not have sent Beret to Fresh Start, nor paid Fresh Start a substantial sum of money.. As a proximate result of Defendants fraudulent conduct, Plaintiffs have suffered damages in excess of $, THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF NEGLIGENCE. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set. Defendants owed Plaintiffs a duty to render substance abuse treatment to Beret Pugh in a manner that did not subject her to an unreasonable risk of harm. Defendants further had a duty of care to render reasonably safe and effective treatment to Beret Pugh.. Defendants breached these duties by: (i) instructing Beret to sit in a sauna for hours per day while ingesting extreme dosages of Niacin; (ii) failing to staff the Fresh Start treatment
11 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 facility, and particularly the sauna, with any qualified medical personnel; (iii) failing to provide duly qualified counselors to administer treatment; and (iv) providing Scientology in lieu of substance abuse treatment. 0. As a proximate result of Defendants breaches of the above duties, Plaintiff Beret Pugh has suffered injuries in excess of $, FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set. Defendants engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct with the intention of causing, or with reckless disregard of the probability of causing Plaintiffs severe or extreme emotional distress. Defendants extreme and outrageous conduct consisted of, inter alia: providing Beret Pugh Scientology in lieu of drug treatment or substance abuse counseling; preying on Plaintiffs vulnerabilities and attempting to recruit Plaintiff Beret Pugh into Scientology under the guise of providing drug treatment.. As a proximate result of Defendants extreme and outrageous conduct, Plaintiff Beret Pugh has suffered severe and extreme emotional distress beyond what any person in a civilized society should be expected to endure. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set. Defendants made the following false representation of fact to Plaintiffs: (i) that the Narconon Fresh Start program has a % success rate; (ii) that the Narconon program is secular and does not involve the study or practice of any religion; (iii) that Beret would receive counseling
12 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 related to substance abuse at Fresh Start; (iv) that Fresh Start s sauna program, i.e, the Purification Rundown, is safe and has been scientifically proven as effective to reduce or eliminate drug cravings; and (v) and that Beret would be under the care of licensed medical professionals, such as doctors or nurses, at Fresh Start.. Acting on behalf of Defendants, Dan Carmichael and Ryan of Fresh Start, made these statements to Dean Pugh on or about August 0, 0, to induce Plaintiffs Dean Pugh and Charis Yates to send their daughter to Fresh Start.. Defendants made these statements to Plaintiffs in the course of Fresh Start s business. These statements were for Plaintiffs guidance in their transaction with Fresh Start. Plaintiffs relied on these false statements of fact resulting in substantial pecuniary loss and other injuries to Plaintiffs.. Defendants made these statements without exercising reasonable care. SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF NEGLIGENCE PER SE. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set 0. Defendants performed medical procedures on Plaintiff Beret Pugh for which a medical license was required under NRS 0.0. Such procedures included non-physicians instructing Beret Pugh to ingest extreme doses of Niacin while undergoing Fresh Start s sauna program.. Plaintiff Beret Pugh is in the class of persons the license requirement under NRS 0.0 is intended to protect and the injury she sustained is of the type against which the statute is intended to protect.. As a proximate result, Plaintiff Beret Pugh sustained injuries. /// ///
13 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF CIVIL RICO FOR MAIL AND WIRE FRAUD, U.S.C. (c). Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set. Plaintiffs have been injured by Defendants conduct of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.. Defendants have engaged in a scheme to defraud Plaintiffs and countless others. In furtherance of that scheme, Defendants have committed countless acts of mail fraud and wire fraud under U.S.C. within the preceding ten years.. Defendants perpetrate this scheme as follows: When prospective patients or their loved ones are referred to Narconon facility, they then speak to an intake specialist. The intake specialist following a script makes claims that Narconon knows to be false and without scientific support such as the claims that Dan Carmichael and Ryan made to Plaintiffs in this case on or about August 0, 0. These false claims include: (i) that Narconon has a more than % success rate; (ii) that Narconon s sauna program reduces or eliminates drug cravings by eliminating toxins from an addict s fatty tissue; (iii) that patients at Narconon will receive extensive drug counseling; (iv) that the Narconon treatment program does not involve the study or practice of any religion; and (v) that patients at the Narconon facility will be under the supervision of licensed physicians and other medical personnel.. Defendants also mail prospective clients such as Plaintiffs pamphlets making these same false claims to induce them to enter into the program. Defendants refer prospective patients to its website where these false claims are also made. NI and ABLE approve Narconon Fresh Start s marketing materials and scripts that contain these false claims.
14 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. As was the case here, Defendants recruit prospective clients from different states in which the facility is located. For that reason, Defendants use of the phones, wires, mail, and internet is integral to their fraudulent scheme.. When patients such as Beret Pugh enter the Narconon treatment program, instead of receiving the extensive counseling and substance abuse treatment they and their families were promised, Narconon provides only instruction in Scientology and dangerous Scientology rituals such as the sauna program. In addition, Defendants use their treatment program as a recruiting tool for the Church of Scientology, as evidenced by Defendants own documents, attached hereto as Exhibits C and D. 0. While a patient is undergoing the program, Defendants prepare the patient to become a Narconon staff member following the patient s completion of the program. In doing so, the patient becomes a counselor for the next wave of incoming patients. This scheme allows Defendants to pay a patient-turned-counselor low wages and Defendants are spared the relatively higher cost of paying duly qualified addiction counselors.. As a result of Defendants racketeering activity, Plaintiffs have suffered pecuniary damages and other injuries. EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF BREACH OF IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set. The contract Plaintiffs Dean Pugh and Charis Yates entered into with Defendants for Defendants to provide treatment to Beret contained an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.. Defendants acted unfaithfully to the purpose of the contract and Plaintiffs justified expectations by, inter alia: () having Beret unwittingly study and practice Scientology in lieu of
15 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 engaging in drug treatment; and () attempting to have Beret surrender her legal rights in exchange for services for which Plaintiffs had already provided consideration; and () persuading Dean and Charis to send Beret to Fresh Start with promises that Narconon s sauna program would reduce or eliminate his drug cravings by flushing toxins and then asking Beret at Narconon to sign an acknowledgement that the sauna program is not a medical program and that it provides no physical gains.. As a consequence of Defendants breaches, Plaintiffs have suffered damages. NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION CIVIL CONSPIRACY. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set. Defendants intended to act in concert to accomplish the unlawful objectives of indoctrinating and recruiting Plaintiff Beret Pugh into Scientology under the guise of providing her with drug treatment.. Defendants further acted in concert to have non-physicians perform medical procedures on Plaintiff Beret Pugh for which a medical license was required under NRS As a proximate result of Defendants intentional actions in concert to accomplish unlawful objectives to harm Plaintiff Beret Pugh, she has been harmed. TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION FRAUD CLAIMS PURSUANT TO NRS Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth herein, each and every allegation set. By reason of Defendants actions complained of herein, Plaintiffs are victims of consumer fraud.
16 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Defendants have engaged in numerous deceptive trade practices as defined in NRS.0 to.0, inclusive. The following is a non-exhaustive list of the deceptive trade practices Defendants have engaged in with respect to Plaintiffs: (i) advertising substance abuse treatment with the intent not to sell them as advertised by providing Scientology instead; (ii) knowingly making false representations about the Narconon treatment program s success rate, the personnel delivering the treatment program, and the benefits of the sauna program; (iii) using bait and switch advertising whereby Defendants advertise extensive substance abuse counseling and treatment and then deliver a treatment program wherein the patient receives only Scientology instruction and dangerous Scientology rituals; (iv) failing to disclose material facts to Plaintiffs about the services Defendants were selling including, but not limited to, the fact that Defendants treatment program consisted of Scientology doctrines and practices and the staff at Fresh Start consisted of graduates of the Narconon treatment program without any other qualification; and (v) making assertions of scientific, clinical, or quantifiable fact without having appropriate evidence such as Defendants assertions of its % success rate for its treatment program and Defendants claims that the New Life Detoxification Program can reduce or eliminate drug cravings.. Plaintiffs have been the victims of Defendants deceptive trade practices listed above and, as a result, have suffered substantial pecuniary damages and other injuries.. Defendants deceptive trade practices are likely to continue absent court intervention.. Plaintiffs are entitled to all available relief under NRS.00 including Plaintiffs attorney s fees and costs of this action, an award for their damages, and an injunction restraining Defendants from further engaging in the deceptive trade practices complained of herein. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiffs demand a jury trial on all issues triable. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs prays for the following relief:
17 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of A. Judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants for damages in such amounts as may be proven at trial; B. Compensation for special, general, and treble damages, as well for loss of parental consortium; C. Reasonable attorney s fees and costs of suit; D. Interest at the statutory rate; E. Punitive or exemplary damages against Defendant; F. Injunctive relief restraining Defendants from further engaging in deceptive trade practices; and G. All further relief, both legal and equitable, that the Court deems just and proper. DATED this May, 0. 0 Respectfully submitted, By:_/s/Ryan A.Hamilton_ RYAN A. HAMILTON, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. HAMILTON LAW S. Durango Dr., Ste. C Las Vegas, NV (0) - (0) - [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs
Case 1:14-cv-01862 Document 1 Filed 07/06/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-01862 Document 1 Filed 07/06/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. JERRY COURSON, a Missouri Citizen; and CHRISTY
Case 2:14-cv-01588 Document 1 Filed 09/26/14 Page 1 of 12
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Ryan A. Hamilton NV BAR NO. HAMILTON LAW S. Durango Dr., Ste. C Las Vegas, NV (0) - (0) - (fax) [email protected] Attorney for the plaintiffs UNITED STATES
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 100 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND
Case 2:12-cv-07481-SRC-CLW Document 1 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:12-cv-07481-SRC-CLW Document 1 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1 Michael D. Camarinos, Esq. Mavroudis, Rizzo & Guarino, LLC Attorneys at Law 690 Kinderkamack Road Oradell, New Jersey 07649 Telephone:
Case 2:14-cv-00167-JCM-CWH Document 7 Filed 03/25/14 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-00-jcm-cwh Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Ryan A. Hamilton NEVADA BAR NO. HAMILTON LAW S. Durango Dr., Ste. C Las Vegas, NV (0) - (0) - [email protected] Attorney for the plaintiffs,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. INFANT SWIMMING RESEARCH, INC., v. Plaintiff, FAEGRE & BENSON, LLP, MARK FISCHER, JUDY HEUMANN, NORMAN HEUMANN, BOULDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JPM NETWORKS, LLC, ) d/b/a KWIKBOOST ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 3:14-cv-1507 JCM FIRST VENTURE, LLC )
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
JAMES W. JOHNSTON ATTORNEY AT LAW 00 S. Flower Street, Suite 10 Los Angeles, California 001 State Bar No. (1) 1- Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in
Weld County, Colorado, District Court, 901 9 th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970.351.7300 Plaintiff: vs. Defendants: JENNIFER BELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRADLEY PETROLEUM,
Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Defendants.
Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN FATWALLET, INC., a Delaware corporation, v. ANDREW CHIU, an individual, and
Complaint as permitted by Case Management Order # 4 and Implementing Order PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE
[INSERT NAME], Plaintiff(s) vs. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, d/b/a STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS, JILL DOE MANUFACTURERS (1-10), JACK DOE WHOLESALERS (1-10), JAKE DOE SELLERS (1-10),
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00-loa Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Bradley Jardis, vs. Keith M. Knowlton, L.L.C. SBN 0 S. Rural Road, Suite 0, PMB# Tempe, Arizona -00 (0 -; FAX (0 - Keith M. Knowlton - SBN 0 Attorney for Plaintiff
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY
THE HONORABLE CAROL MURPHY 1 1 1 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY TARVA LEE, ) ) No: --00- Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF ) CONTRACT, BAD FAITH, FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY
IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF UTAH. Case No. : Judge:
Alan W. Mortensen (6616) DEWSNUP, KING & OLSEN 36 South State Street, Ste. 2400 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone (801) 533-0400 Facsimile (801) 363-4218 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA H.L. WATKINS AND COMPANY, INC., ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. ) ) 06-CV8980-3 THE HOT LEAD COMPANY, LLC, ) ROBERT MICHAEL HORNE, )
How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California
1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLAINTIFF MCAFEE, INC. S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION McAFEE, INC. v. Plaintiff, WILMER, CUTLER, PICKERING, HALE AND DORR, L.L.P JURY REQUESTED No. 4:08-cv-160 MHS-DDB Defendant.
CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA File No. Julius Chad Zimmerman, Plaintiff, v. Dave Bellows, in his individual and official
Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8
Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# [email protected] THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#
Case 3:14-cv-00039-MMD-VPC Document 12-1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1
Case :-cv-000-mmd-vpc Document - Filed 0// Page of EXHIBIT EXHIBIT Case :-cv-000-mmd-vpc Document - Filed 0// Page of JOHN OHLSON, ESQ. NV Bar No. Hill Street, Suite 0 Reno, Nevada 0 Telephone: () -00
COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
DISTRICT COURT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, CO 80401 (303) 271-6145 Plaintiffs: NORMAN NEWELL and LINDA NEWELL, v. Defendants: COURT USE ONLY APRIA HEALTHCARE, INC.;
Fraud - Trading Commodity Futures
Case 2:06-cv-00132-KJD-LRL Document 1 Filed 02/03/2006 Page 1 of 10 Louis V. Traeger California State Bar No. 38714 [email protected] William P. Janulis IL ARDC No. 1326449 Rosemary Hollinger IL ARDC No.
CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825
CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825 Filed 13 September 9 P4:46 Gary Fitzsimmons District Clerk Dallas District CADE MANNETTI, v. Plaintiff, VISIONARY RESTAURANTS LLC, VISIONARY STAFFING LLC, WILLIAM McCROREY, AND THOMAS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 LAKESHORE LAW CENTER Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. (State Bar No. 0 0 Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite 0-0 Yorba Linda, CA --0 --0 (fax [email protected] Attorney and Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of Michael Millen Attorney at Law (#) Calle Marguerita Ste. 0 Telephone: Fax: (0) -0 [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAMELA ANDERSON, Individually and ) as Independent
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION. In Re: Bankruptcy No. 09-26549. (Chapter 11) Filed Electronically
Document Page 1 of 16 Steven C. Tycksen, #3300 Chad Shattuck, #9345 TYCKSEN & SHATTUCK, L.C. 12401 South 450 East, Unit E1 Draper, Utah 84020 Telephone: 801-748-4081 Facsimile: 801-748-4087 [email protected]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. (SBN: ) [email protected] Robert L. Hyde, Esq. (SBN: ) [email protected] Hyde & Swigart Camino Del Rio South,
FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
District Court, Denver County, Colorado 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 GUILLERMO ARTEAGA-GOMEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED: January 22, 2015 6:02
STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff,
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER CITY AND COUNTY, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. LEGAL AID d/b/a LEGAL AID US, a Colorado
SILVERLAW.COM 954-755-4799
Filing # 19686414 Electronically Filed 10/22/2014 02:30:10 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION Case No: SKYE BONOW,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AEROSCOUT, LTD. and AEROSCOUT, INC., v. CENTRAK INC., Plaintiffs, Defendant. C.A. No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs AeroScout,
) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel ANN I. JONES RAYMOND E. McKOWN Federal Trade Commission 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite Los Angeles, California 00 ( -00 JOHN ANDREW SINGER Federal Trade Commission
Case 1:13-cv-00001-SEB-TAB Document 1 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 1:13-cv-00001-SEB-TAB Document 1 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION JAIME MILLER, Plaintiff v. No.: 1:13-cv-1 CITY
Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12 ORIGH~~AL
Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12 ORIGH~~AL EXECSUMMITS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILEDINCLERK'Sorn NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA u.s.o.c. -A~nCE
Case 1:05-cv-01658-CCB Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/2005 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:05-cv-01658-CCB Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/2005 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Northern Division SPRINGFIELD FINANCIAL COMPANY, L.L.C., d/b/a SFC, L.L.C.,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Paul L. Hoffman, CSB #1 Michael D. Seplow, CSB # 0 K. Arianne Jordan, CSB # 1 SCHONBRUN DeSIMONE SEPLOW HARRIS & HOFFMAN LLP Ocean Front Walk Venice, California 01 Telephone: ( -01 Fax: ( -00 Gloria Allred,
Case 2:06-cv-15766-JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-15766-JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MAZZONI
Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43
Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43 Calvin L. Keith, OSB No. 814368 [email protected] Sarah J. Crooks, OSB No. 971512 [email protected] PERKINS COIE LLP
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * *
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA vs. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER CV-99-792 Defendants. COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiffs, Bryan K. Bunten and Lisa Bunten, are over the age of nineteen (19) years
Case 1:12-cv-03270-WJM-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:12-cv-03270-WJM-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 Civil Action No. 12-CV-3270 BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION WAYNE WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PROTECT SECURITY, LLC. Defendant.
Case3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-JCS Document Filed0/0/ Page of KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP Karl S. Kronenberger (Bar No. ) Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Bar No. ) Ansel J. Halliburton (Bar No. 0) 0 Post Street, Suite 0 San Francisco,
FILED 15 JUL 27 AM 9:22
FILED JUL AM : KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --- KNT JUDITH JORGENSEN, vs. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY Plaintiff, JAMES WONG and TYRA WONG, husband and wife creating
PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com
Form: Plaintiff's original petition-wrongful Death [Name], PLAINTIFF vs. [Name], DEFENDANT [ IN THE [Type of Court] COURT [Court number] PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION 1. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Plaintiff
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
Jack Anderson, Esq. SBN 0 JACK ANDERSON, ESQ., APLC Balboa Avenue, Suite E San Diego, California Tel.: ( - Fax: ( 0- [email protected] Attorney for Defendant and Cross-Complainant Starline Windows,
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN RICHARD TEAGUE Plaintiff, Case No. 12- -NO v. Hon. NARCONON FREEDOM CENTER, INC., a Michigan Non Profit Corporation, A FOREVER RECOVERY,
Case 2:09-cv-00064-GZS Document 1 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 2:09-cv-00064-GZS Document 1 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. ) DONNA L. HAMILTON,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) [email protected] ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) [email protected] KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) [email protected]
Case 14-90056-LT Filed 05/14/14 Entered 05/14/14 14:14:36 Doc 6 Pg. 1 of 13
Case -00-LT Filed 0// Entered 0// :: Doc Pg. of NANCY L. STAGG, CA Bar No. 0 [email protected] MATTHEW J. RIOPELLE, CA Bar No. 0 [email protected] FOLEY & LARDNER LLP VALLEY CENTRE DRIVE, SUITE 00 SAN
Case 1:11-cv-00273-CMA -CBS Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:11-cv-00273-CMA -CBS Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. MIKHAIL MATS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID MAZIN;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney GARY PLESSMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Fraud Section California State Bar No. 1 Room 1, Federal Building 00 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE DERMAFOCUS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, v. Plaintiff, ULTHERA, INC., a Delaware corporation. Civil Action No: DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendant.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
JAMES C. STURDEVANT (SBN 94551 JESPER I. RASMUSSEN (SBN 121001 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 475 Sansome Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415 477-2410
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ) i'" 17-1 1 - - -a* 1, T Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) 3R BANCORP; ) ) 3R E-SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Case 3:15-cv-00012-CAR Document 9 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-00012-CAR Document 9 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION MELISSA BROWN and BEN JENKINS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs.
Case No.: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANSHIP AND HABITABILITY. Plaintiffs,
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Stephen L. Weber, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) Michael J. White, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) James W. Fleming, Esq. (AZ SBN 0) KASDAN SIMONDS WEBER & VAUGHAN LLP 00 N. Central Ave., Suite 0 Phoenix, AZ 0 E-Mail:
Case 2:13-cv-00279-TOR Document 1 Filed 07/30/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
0 JONATHAN E. NUECHTERLEIN General Counsel ROBERT J. SCHROEDER Regional Director NADINE SAMTER, WA Bar # JENNIFER LARABEE, CA Bar # nd Ave., Suite Seattle, WA ( 0- (Samter; ( 0-0 (Larabee Email: [email protected];
GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent
POMPELIO, FOREMAN & GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent HENRY KENT, vs. Plaintiff, SMILES II RESTAURANT,
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 DATE FILED: June 20, 2014 12:58 PM FILING ID: 592F22DEF1397 CASE NUMBER: 2014CV31778
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI JANE DOE INDIVIDUALLY ) and on BEHALF OF ) THE CLASS OF PERSONS ) DESIGNATED BY 537.080, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case Number *************** vs. ) ) DEFENDANT
DATED: April 29, 2002 BARRY NOVACK
BLANCHARD E. TUAL, Administrator CASE NO. EC 034380 of the Estate of BONNY LEE BAKLEY on behalf of the Heirs of COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR said Decedent, WRONGFUL DEATH Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT BLAKE, aka
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 Daniel G. Shay, CA Bar #0 [email protected] LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL G. SHAY 0 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 1B San Diego, California 0 Tel:.. Fax:.1. Benjamin H. Richman* [email protected] J.
Case 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO DAVID ASHE Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 10-2236 ( DRD ) vs. DISTRIBUIDORA NORMA,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BLACK & HAMILL LLP Bradford J. Black (SBN 1) [email protected] Andrew G. Hamill (SBN 1) [email protected] Embarcadero Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California 1 Telephone: --0 Facsimile: -- DESMARAIS
4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10
4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Ryan Michael Stinnett, on behalf of himself CASE
Case3:13-cv-02858-JST Document27 Filed11/27/13 Page1 of 14
Case:-cv-0-JST Document Filed// Page of 0 Clayeo C. Arnold, California SBN 00 [email protected] Christine M. Doyle, California SBN 0 [email protected] CLAYEO C. ARNOLD, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) LAW FIRM OF KAISER, DEBIASO. ANDREW AND SWINDELLS SUMfTOMO TOWER NINTH FLOOR 444 WEST OCEAN BOULEVARD LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802-4516 (310) 590-8471 ERIC C. DEMLER
How To Settle A Class Action Lawsuit Against Jimmy Johns
LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STARKS vs. JIMMY JOHN S LLC, et al. CASE NO. BC01 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. PLEASE READ IT
How To Sue A Magazine Publisher In Cocolorado
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE FILED: April 29, 2013 5:19 PM
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF GEORGIA. NOW COMES the named plaintiff, for himse_if and all
! IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF GEORGIA L. WAYNE GRIFFIN, and all other persons similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs AMERICAN DEFENDER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant CIVIL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO: 00-CIV-6061-FERGUSON/SNOW AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO: 00-CIV-6061-FERGUSON/SNOW DR. PAUL ZIDEL, and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, ALLSTATE INSURANCE
Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Case 6:10-cv-00557 Document 1 Filed 10/21/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION TRANSDATA, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 6:10-cv-557
Case 7:15-cv-08630 Document 1 Filed 11/03/15 Page 1 of 11
Case 7:15-cv-08630 Document 1 Filed 11/03/15 Page 1 of 11 PREET BHARARA United States Attorney Southern District of New York By: ELLEN M. LONDON Assistant United States Attorney 86 Chambers Street, 3 rd
Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants.
BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California HERSCHEL T. ELKINS Senior Assistant Attorney General ALBERT NORMAN SHELDEN Supervising Deputy Attorney General HOWARD WAYNE (State Bar No. ) Deputy
APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS In re: MICHELE GRAHAM, Case No.: 02-43262 (Chapter 7 Debtor. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Adversary Proceeding
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION Plaintiff, Case No. v. HAMILTON COMPANY AND HAMILTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 Sterling A. Brennan (CA State Bar No. 01) E-Mail: [email protected] Tyson K. Hottinger (CA State Bar No. 1) E-Mail: [email protected] MASCHOFF BRENNAN LAYCOCK GILMORE ISRAELSEN & WRIGHT, PLLC
Case4:13-cv-05715-DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5
Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed// Page of WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 0 (CA) MARCIA L. MITCHELL, SBN (WA) DERA A. SMITH, SBN (CA) U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Phillip Burton Federal Building 0
Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 OSB#013943 [email protected] Attorney At Law 4411 NE Tillamook St Portland, OR 97140 971-219-8453 Attorney for Plaintiff IN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) SHARON PETTWAY, and ) MARSHA HUBBARD ) ) individually and on behalf of all ) others similarly situated, ) ) Civil Action No. ) 03-10932-RCL Plaintiffs,
- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,
- "'. --, -.:li ') " :::; ),-~ --' DA VlD SHONKA Acting General Counsel 2 BARBARA Y.K. CHUN, Cal. BarNo. 0 3 JOHN D. JACOBS, Cal. Bar No. 1344 Federal Trade Commission 4 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 00 Los Angeles,
CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA QUALITY BICYCLE PRODUCTS, INC. v. Plaintiff, BIKEBARON, LLC SINCLAIR IMPORTS, LLC and
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.
TREVOR A. GRIMM, State Bar No. JONATHAN M. COUPAL, State Bar No. 1 TIMOTHY A. BITTLE, State Bar No. 00 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation 1 Eleventh Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 1 (1-0 Attorneys for
No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KELVIN BLEDSOE, Plaintiff, v. SAAQIN, INC., No. COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff Kelvin
Case 15-02065 Doc 1 Filed 04/07/15 Entered 04/07/15 11:42:31 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13
Document Page 1 of 13 George Hoffman (10005) Benjamin J. Kotter (9592) Adam H. Reiser (13339) COHNE KINGHORN, P.C. 111 East Broadway, 11 th Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 363-4300 Facsimile:
Case 4:09-cv-00502-RCC Document 1 Filed 09/04/09 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,
Case :0-cv-000-RCC Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of DAVID MONROE QUANTZ, P.L.C. E. Camp Lowell Dr. Tucson, Arizona ( -00 David Monroe Quantz State Bar No: 000 [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff
13cv8257 Judge Virginia M. Kendall Magistrate Jeffrey T. Gilbert
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RECEIVED NOV 1 8 2013 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No. v. MODERN TECHNOLOGY INC., a Wyoming corporation, also doing
Case 2:14-cv-01620-KOB Document 1 Filed 08/20/14 Page 1 of 38
Case 2:14-cv-01620-KOB Document 1 Filed 08/20/14 Page 1 of 38 FILED 2014 Aug-21 AM 11:13 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Andrew W. Stavros (8615) Austin B. Egan (13203) STAVROS LAW P.C. 11693 South 700 East, Suite 200 Draper, Utah 84020 Tel: (801) 758.7604 Fax: (801) 893.3573 Email: [email protected] [email protected]
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
JAMES W. JOHNSTON ATTORNEY AT LAW 00 S. Flower Street, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 001 State Bar No. (1) 1- Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case :0-cv-0-VRW Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of FRITZ CLAPP (Cal. Bar No. ) Attorney at Law 0 Foothill Boulevard Oakland, California 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-mail: Attorney
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMENDED COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION
Case 3:08-cv-01939-JMM Document 12 Filed 03/18/2009 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Plaintiff, Docket 3:08-cv-01939-JMM (JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 v. FAIRWARNING, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Iatric Systems, Inc.
PREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit.
Information or instructions: Plaintiff's original petition-auto accident 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. 2. It assumes several plaintiffs were rear-ended by an employee
