SOCIAL SECURITY Office of Human Resources March 28, 2014
|
|
|
- Cuthbert Leonard
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Honorable Joseph R. Biden President of the Senate S-212 Capitol Building Washington, DC SOCIAL SECURITY Office of Human Resources March 28, 2014 Enclosed is the Social Security Administration s (SSA) Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation (No FEAR) Act Report for fiscal year (FY) Congress intended the No FEAR Act to reduce the incidence of workplace discrimination within the Federal Government by making agencies and departments more accountable. SSA s mission is to deliver Social Security services that meet the changing needs of the public. Our service principles include adherence to the law and cultural sensitivity. To maximize our effectiveness, we seek to achieve an exemplary Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) program. The No FEAR Act requires agencies to prepare an annual report describing: (1) their efforts to improve compliance with the employment discrimination and whistleblower protection laws; and (2) the status of complaints brought against the agency under these laws. The No FEAR Act Annual Report must include specific information on each agency s EEO complaints activity (including Federal district court cases) and resulting disciplinary actions, Judgment Fund reimbursements, and an analysis of trends, causation, and practical knowledge gained through experience. The No FEAR Act requires agencies to submit their reports to the President pro tempore of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, the House Committee on Government Reform, each committee of Congress with jurisdiction relating to the submitting agency, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the Attorney General. Therefore, we are providing our FY 2013 No FEAR Act Report to the following members of the 113 th United States Congress: The Social Security Administration, Office of Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity, prepared this No FEAR Act Report pursuant to Congressional requirements. If you have any questions, please contact me at If your staff has any questions, they may contact Alan S. Frank, Associate Commissioner, Office of Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity, at Sincerely, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BALTIMORE, MD /s/ Reginald F. Wells, Ph.D. Deputy Commissioner for Human Resources
2 Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation (No FEAR) Act Annual Report Social Security Administration Fiscal Year 2013
3 Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation (No FEAR) Act Annual Report Fiscal Year (FY) 2013
4 REPORT CONTENTS Section I: Summary of District Court Cases (FY 2013) Page 3 Section II: Year-End Data (See Attachment A) Page 4 Section III: Disciplinary Policies and Administrative Discipline Page 4 Section IV: Analysis of Discrimination Complaints Page 5 A. Examination of Trends and Causal Analysis B. Practical Knowledge Gained through Experience C. Actions Planned to Improve Agency Complaint or Civil Rights Program Attachment A: Attachment B: Equal Employment Opportunity Complaint Data (FY FY 2013) Page 11 SSA s No FEAR Act Notice Posted on the Agency s Internet Webpage Page 38 SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 2
5 Social Security Administration (SSA) No FEAR Act Report Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 The No FEAR Act requires each agency to submit to Congress, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Attorney General, and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) an annual report describing: (1) each agency s efforts to improve compliance with the employment discrimination and whistleblower protection laws; and (2) the status of complaints brought against the agency under these laws. The reporting requirements are in section 203 of the No FEAR Act; each italicized paragraph below reflects a specific paragraph in section 203 to which our agency must respond. Section I. Summary of District Court Cases (FY 2013) The data below show all cases and payments to the Judgment Fund in FY 2013, regardless of the case filing date. Since complainants may file a single case under multiple statutes, the number of cases will not total. Also, the total number of cases settled, pending, and adjudicated will not equal the total number filed because of cases filed before FY The number of cases arising under each of the respective provisions of law covered by paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 201(a) of the No FEAR Act, in which discrimination on the part of the agency was alleged: Total pending cases at close of FY 2013: 74 The 74 cases alleged violations of the following laws: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII): 57 cases Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA): 18 cases Rehabilitation Act (disability): 29 cases Of the 74 pending cases at the close of FY 2013, 42 were new cases received in FY The 42 new cases alleged violations of the following laws: Title VII: 34 cases ADEA: 7 cases Rehabilitation Act (disability): 18 cases 2. The status or disposition of cases described in the above response: Federal court cases concluded in FY 2013: 13 Dismissed/Judgment for SSA: 11 Judgment against SSA: 0 Settled: 2 3. The amount of money required to be reimbursed by the agency under section 201 in connection with each case, separately identifying the aggregate amount of the reimbursements attributable to the payment of attorneys fees, if any: Total: $54,000 Attorney s Fees: $1,000 SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 3
6 4. The number of employees disciplined for discrimination, retaliation, harassment, or any other infraction of any provision of law referred to in paragraph (1) of section 201(a) of the No FEAR Act. SSA did not discipline any employees for discrimination, retaliation, harassment, or any other infraction resulting from court cases. Section II. Year-End Data 5. The final year-end data posted under section 301(c)(1)(B) for FY 2013 (without regard to section 301(c)(2)). See Attachment A for SSA s No FEAR Act data for FY SSA updates the data quarterly and posts the information online at Section III. Disciplinary Policies and Administrative Discipline 6. A detailed description of A. The agency s policy implemented relating to appropriate disciplinary actions against a Federal employee who i. discriminated against any individual in violation of any of the laws cited under section 201(a)(1) or (2) of the No FEAR Act, or ii. committed another prohibited personnel practice that was revealed in the investigation of a complaint alleging a violation of any of the laws cited under section 201(a)(1) or (2), and With respect to items i and ii, our agency follows OPM s Government-wide regulations found in 5 C.F.R. for disciplinary actions against employees who violate the antidiscrimination laws. We use a variety of methods to inform employees about what constitutes inappropriate conduct that could lead to discipline and the penalties for the discipline. We provide the information to employees in new employee orientation, biannual equal employment opportunity (EEO) training required by the No Fear Act, ethics training, and informal discussions between managers and employees. In addition, we post on the intranet the Standards of Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch and policies on EEO, labor and employee relations, and the No FEAR Act. We follow the No FEAR Act requirements and consider the appropriate disciplinary action in all cases, where necessary. B. With respect to these laws, the number of employees disciplined in accordance with the agency s policy and the specific nature of the disciplinary action taken. We did not impose discipline on any employees in FY 2013 for engaging in actions constituting discrimination, retaliation, or harassment. SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 4
7 Section IV. Analysiss of Discrimination Complaints 7. An analysis of the information describedd under paragraphs (1) through (6) above (in conjunction with data the agency provided to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in compliance with 29 C.F.R. Part 1614) ), including: : a. An examination of trends; b. Causal analysis; c. Practical knowledge gained through experience; and d. Any actions planned or taken to improve the agency s complaint or civil rights programs. A. Examination of Trends and Causal Analysis 1 SSA typically receives between 450 and 500 new EEO complaints each fiscal year (FY 2010 was an exception, with 565 complaints filed). Over the last three fiscal years, the agency averaged 488 filings of new EEO complaints. Fiscal year 2013 complaint activity (481 complaints) reveals a 2.63 percent decrease in complaints filed from FY 2012 (494 complaints). In addition, the number of complainants who filed formal EEO complaints decreased by 3.1 percent (437 complainants in FY 2013 compared to 451 complainants in FY 2012). 1 All data is from SSA s respective year s officially submitted EEOC Form 4622 Report. SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 5
8 For FYs , the top three complaint bases were reprisal, age, and race, and the top issues were harassment (non-sexual), promotion/non-selection, and evaluation/appraisal. Reprisal was the leading basis from FYs , and age was the leading basis for FY Harassment (non-sexual) was the leading issue from FYs and promotion/non-selection was the top issue for FY Our top bases and issues are consistent with those from other Federal agencies, as reported in the EEOC s FY 2012 Annual Report on the Federal Workforce. Top Three Bases Fiscal Years FY FY 2013 Reprisal Age Race Top Three Issues Fiscal Years FY FY 2013 Harassment (Non-Sexual) Promotion/Non-Selection Evaluation/Appraisal In FY 2013, there was a 13.3 percent increase in the total number of investigations (384) completed compared to the number completed in FY 2012 (330). In FY 2013, the timeliness of our investigations decreased by 41.9 percentage points; from 82.3 percent in FY 2012 to 40.4 percent in FY Complaints Fiscal Year 2008 Fiscal Year 2009 Fiscal Year 2010 Fiscal Year 2011 Fiscal Year 2012 Fiscal Year 2013 Total Completed Investigations Timely Completed Investigations Percentage Timely 29.4% 35.6% 82.8% 72.5% 82.3% 40.4% Average Days In FY 2013, we closed 51 EEO complaints with monetary corrective actions totaling $1,051,484. The monetary actions consisted of back pay/front pay ($84,035), compensatory damages ($237,554), lump sum payments ($241,088), and attorneys fees and costs ($488,807). SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 6
9 Fiscal Year # of Cases Closed with Monetary Corrective Actions Total Amount Paid FY $190,905 FY $245,500 FY $310,063 FY $120,909 FY $988,491 FY $1,051,484 In FY 2013, we timely completed pre-complaint counseling at an 87.5 percent rate. We experienced a slight decrease in the pre-complaint Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) settlement rate, from 45.8 percent in FY 2012 to 45.1 percent in FY FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Number of Counselings Number of Timely Counselings Percentage Timely 70.2% 85.9% 92.2% 93.8% 95.0% 87.5% % of Completed Counselings Resolved (Settled/Withdrawn) 47.6% 45.9% 41.6% 45.7% 45.8% 45.1% B. Practical Knowledge Gained through Experience As our agency administers the Social Security programs and provides services that meet the changing needs of the public, we also endeavor to meet the needs of our valued staff. Our employees are the key to our success, providing the highest quality service to the American public. In order for the agency to meet its goals, a high-performing workforce is critical. We must continue to attract, retain, develop, motivate, and reward a diverse workforce and foster a culture of continuous improvement. Our commitment to our talented and richly diverse employees enabled us to maintain our ranking in the Top Ten Federal Agencies Best Places to Work report for the fifth consecutive year. SSA ranked sixth overall for large agencies, and among the top ten in five out of ten individual categories. In FY 2013, our agency performed the following activities to enhance employee awareness of workforce diversity and promote agency antidiscrimination principles: continued our long-standing practice of meetings with agency senior executives to provide them with detailed analyses of the workforce composition of each of their components, discuss trends, and provide recommendations on how to improve the agency s workforce in areas of underrepresentation; engaged in outreach activities with SSA executives and managers nationwide to discuss EEO legal developments and ensure continued compliance with anti-discrimination laws; SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 7
10 provided EEO training to managers and employees nationwide on a variety of EEO subjects, including basic EEO, cultural sensitivity, management pitfalls, EEO laws, anti-harassment, and ADR as part of our continual effort to heighten awareness of how EEO issues arise in the workplace; presented diversity and inclusion training; presented training to managers on ethics and reasonable accommodations, including how to navigate the reasonable accommodation process; provided training on the reasonable accommodation process and employment law to newly hired attorneys to encourage appreciation for workforce diversity and agency antidiscrimination principles and policies and ensure they provide sound legal advice in these areas; completed No FEAR Act training with a 98.5 percent participation rate; updated the No FEAR Act Disciplinary Policy and EEO policy statement; updated the No FEAR Act Notice and the Harassing Conduct section in the agency s Annual Personnel Reminders; held eight Special Emphasis Program Observances and four memorial observances at SSA Headquarters to celebrate diversity and the contributions of individuals from all protected groups and veterans; continued hosting diversity celebrations for regional employees that highlighted the ethnicity and culture of diverse groups represented in the regions, in conjunction with our eight advisory councils; formally chartered our eighth advisory council, the Veterans and Military Affairs Advisory Council, to advise agency leadership on veteran issues and improve service delivery to our veteran population; participated in three outreach workshops hosted by Veterans Service organizations and local State Career Service Centers, meeting with veterans and individuals with disabilities to provide information on qualifying and applying for Federal jobs; maximized use of Schedule A and veterans hiring flexibilities to focus on employment of individuals with disabilities; of the 1,326 employees we hired in FY 2013, 264 selfreported as having a disability (19.9 percent of all hires for the period); participated in the League of United Latin American Citizens and the Federal Training Institute Partnership Conference; continued visiting Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions, Tribal Colleges and Universities, and Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institutions in our efforts to recruit a diverse workforce; SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 8
11 sponsored 30 interns from the Washington Internships for Native Students Program, providing Native American students with professional, real-world work experience through internship experiences at SSA Headquarters, for a total contribution to Tribal Colleges and Universities of $397,290; participated in recruitment events hosted by colleges and universities (including Minority Serving Institutions), attended job fairs and career days, and provided information on SSA employment opportunities to students at colleges and universities; discussed the benefits of ADR during workforce profile meetings with each Deputy Commissioner and encouraged greater participation to resolve cases at the earliest opportunity; for the second consecutive year, over 60 percent of SSA managers agreed to participate in ADR; promoted the use of the Employees Assistance Program (EAP) throughout the agency; held three Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) Council meetings, on January 28, April 3, and September 12; the Chief of Staff and the Chief Diversity Officer co-chair the D&I Council. Council members include agency executives and representatives from the Advisory Councils, Management Associations, and Unions; developed a Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan in support of Executive Order 13583, Establishing a Coordinated Government-wide Initiative to Promote Diversity and Inclusion in the Federal Workplace; the plan identifies our goals of Workforce Diversity, Workplace Inclusion, and Sustainability; and established an agency-level Diversity and Inclusion Champion Award to acknowledge the outstanding contributions and significant work of individuals and teams who actively promote diversity and inclusion excellence in our agency each year. C. Actions Planned to Improve Agency Complaint or Civil Rights Program In FY 2014, SSA will address the following plan objectives to improve our program: collect and analyze Applicant Flow Data from the USA Staffing Program Office at OPM; implement an ADR Training Plan for managers; continue to ensure that managers and supervisors receive annual EEO refresher training; improve EEO complaint processing to meet the required timeframes for processing discrimination complaints; including: modifying standard operating procedures to ensure completion of EEO precomplaint counseling within specified timelines; and implementing new contract requirements and procedures to improve the quality and timeliness of contractor investigations; and continue working with our barrier analysis contractor to identify and resolve potential barriers to equal opportunity. SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 9
12 8. Any adjustment (to the extent the adjustment can be ascertained in the budget of the agency) to comply with the requirements under section 201. There are no anticipated adjustments to comply with the requirements under section 201. SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 10
13 Attachment A 2 Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaint Data (FY FY 2013) 2 All data is from the icomplaints No Fear Report Module. SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 11
14 Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant to the No FEAR Act: SSA Internal Complaint Activity Data as of September 30, 2013 (4th Quarter 2013) Complaint Activity (Sec (a),(b), and (c)) 2013 thru Number of Complaints Filed Number of Complainants Repeat Filers Complaints by Basis (Sec (d)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple bases. The sum of the bases may not equal total complaints filed. Comparative Data (Sec ) 2013 thru Race Color Religion Reprisal Sex National Origin Equal Pay Act SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 12
15 Complaints by Basis (Sec (d)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple bases. The sum of the bases may not equal total complaints filed. Comparative Data (Sec ) 2013 thru Age Disability Genetics Pregnancy Discrimination Act Non-EEO Basis Complaints by Issue (Sec (e)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple issues. The sum of the issues may not equal total complaints filed thru Appointment/Hire Assignment of Duties Awards SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 13
16 Complaints by Issue (Sec (e)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple issues. The sum of the issues may not equal total complaints filed thru Conversion to Full-time Disciplinary Action --Demotion Reprimand Removal Suspension Other Duty Hours Evaluation Appraisal SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 14
17 Complaints by Issue (Sec (e)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple issues. The sum of the issues may not equal total complaints filed thru Examination/Test Harassment --Non-Sexual Sexual Medical Examination Pay (Including Overtime) Promotion/Non-Selection Reassignment --Denied SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 15
18 Complaints by Issue (Sec (e)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple issues. The sum of the issues may not equal total complaints filed thru --Directed Reasonable Accommodation Reinstatement Retirement Termination Terms/Conditions of Employment Time and Attendance Training Other SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 16
19 Processing Time (Sec (f)) The average length of time it has taken an agency to complete, respectively, investigation in final action for: Comparative Data (Sec ) 2013 thru Complaints pending (for any length of time) during fiscal year Average number of days in investigation stage Average number of days in final action stage Complaints pending (for any length of time) during fiscal year where hearing was requested Average number of days in investigation stage Average number of days in final action stage Complaints pending (for any length of time) during fiscal year where hearing was not requested Average number of days in investigation stage SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 17
20 Processing Time (Sec (f)) The average length of time it has taken an agency to complete, respectively, investigation in final action for: Comparative Data (Sec ) 2013 thru Average number of days in final action stage Complaints Dismissed by Agency (Sec (g)) 2013 thru Total Complaints Dismissed by Agency Average days pending prior to dismissal Complaints Withdrawn by Complainants Total complaints Withdrawn by Complainants SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 18
21 Total Final Actions Finding Discrimination ((Sec (i))) Comparative Data ((Sec )) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Total Number Findings Without Hearing With Hearing Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Basis (Sec (i)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple bases. The sum of the bases may not equal total complaints and findings thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Total Number Findings SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 19
22 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Basis (Sec (i)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple bases. The sum of the bases may not equal total complaints and findings thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Race Color Religion Reprisal Sex National Origin Age Disability SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 20
23 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Basis (Sec (i)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple bases. The sum of the bases may not equal total complaints and findings thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Non-EEO Findings After Hearing Race Color Religion Reprisal Sex National Origin SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 21
24 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Basis (Sec (i)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple bases. The sum of the bases may not equal total complaints and findings thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Equal Pay Act Age Disability Non-EEO Findings Without Hearing Race Color Religion SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 22
25 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Basis (Sec (i)) Note: Complaints can be filed alleging multiple bases. The sum of the bases may not equal total complaints and findings thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Reprisal Sex National Origin Equal Pay Act Age Disability Non-EEO Findings of Discrimination 2013 thru SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 23
26 Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) # % # % # % # % # % # % Total Number Findings Appointment/Hire Assignment of Duties Awards Conversion to Fulltime Disciplinary Action --Demotion Reprimand Suspension SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 24
27 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % --Removal Other Duty Hours Evaluation Appraisal Examination/Test Harassment --Non-Sexual Sexual SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 25
28 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Medical Examination Pay (Including Overtime) Promotion/Non- Selection Reassignment --Denied Directed Reasonable Accommodation SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 26
29 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Reinstatement Retirement Termination Terms/Conditions of Employment Time and Attendance Training Other Findings After Hearing SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 27
30 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Appointment/Hire Assignment of Duties Awards Conversion to Fulltime Disciplinary Action --Reprimand Suspension Removal SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 28
31 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % --Other Duty Hours Evaluation Appraisal Examination/Test Harassment --Non-Sexual Sexual Medical Examination SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 29
32 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Pay (Including Overtime) Promotion/Non- Selection Reassignment --Denied Directed Reasonable Accommodation Reinstatement SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 30
33 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Retirement Termination Terms/Conditions of Employment Time and Attendance Training Other Findings Without Hearing Appointment/Hire SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 31
34 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Assignment of Duties Awards Conversion to Fulltime Disciplinary Action --Reprimand Suspension Removal Other SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 32
35 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % --Duty Hours Evaluation Appraisal Examination/Test Harassment --Non-Sexual Sexual Medical Examination Pay (Including Overtime) SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 33
36 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Promotion/Non- Selection Reassignment --Denied Directed Reasonable Accommodation Reinstatement Retirement Termination SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 34
37 Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue (Sec (j)) 2013 thru # % # % # % # % # % # % Terms/Conditions of Employment Time and Attendance Training Other Pending Complaints Filed in Previous Fiscal Years by Status (Sec (l)) Comparative Data 2013 thru Total complaints from previous Fiscal Years Total Complainants SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 35
38 Pending Complaints Filed in Previous Fiscal Years by Status (Sec (l)) Comparative Data 2013 thru Number complaints pending Investigation ROI Issued, pending Complainant's action Hearing Final Agency Action Appeals with EEOC Office of Federal Operations Complaint Investigations (Sec (m)) Comparative Data (Sec ) 2013 thru 9/30 Pending Completion Where Investigation SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 36
39 Complaint Investigations (Sec (m)) Comparative Data (Sec ) 2013 thru 9/30 Exceeds Required Time Frames SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 37
40 Attachment B SSA s No FEAR Act Notice Posted on the Agency s Internet Webpage SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 38
41 EEO Data Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act No FEAR Act Notice On May 15, 2002, Congress enacted the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002, which is now known as the No FEAR Act. One purpose of the Act is to require that Federal agencies be accountable for violations of antidiscrimination and whistleblower protection laws. Public Law , Summary. In support of this purpose, Congress found that agencies cannot be run effectively if those agencies practice or tolerate discrimination. Public Law , Title I, General Provisions, section 101(1). The Act also requires this agency to provide this notice to Federal employees, former Federal employees and applicants for Federal employment to inform you of the rights and protections available to you under Federal antidiscrimination and whistleblower protection laws. Antidiscrimination Laws A Federal agency cannot discriminate against an employee or applicant with respect to the terms, conditions or privileges of employment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, marital status or political affiliation. Discrimination on these bases is prohibited by one or more of the following statutes: 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(1), 29 U.S.C. 206(d), 29 U.S.C. 631, 29 U.S.C. 633a, 29 U.S.C. 791 and 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16. This agency also prohibits discrimination based on parental status and sexual orientation. Executive Order states explicitly that discrimination based upon an individual s status as a parent is prohibited within the Executive Branch of the Federal Government. The right to address sexual orientation discrimination derives from Agency policy. If you believe that you have been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, parental status or sexual orientation you must contact an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) counselor within 45 calendar days of the alleged discriminatory action, or, in the case of a personnel action, within 45 calendar days of the effective date of the action, before you can file a formal complaint of discrimination with the Agency. See, e.g. 29 CFR If you believe that you have been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the basis of age, you must either contact an EEO counselor as noted above or give notice of intent to sue to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 180 calendar days of the alleged discriminatory action. If you are alleging discrimination based on SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 39
42 marital status or political affiliation, you may file a written complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) (see contact information below). In the alternative (or in some cases, in addition), you may pursue a discrimination complaint by filing a grievance through the Agency's administrative or negotiated grievance procedures, if such procedures apply and are available. Whistleblower Protection Laws A Federal employee with authority to take, direct others to take, recommend or approve any personnel action must not use that authority to take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take, a personnel action against an employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that individual that is reasonably believed to evidence violations of law, rule or regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, unless disclosure of such information is specifically prohibited by law and such information is specifically required by Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or the conduct of foreign affairs. Retaliation against an employee or applicant for making a protected disclosure is prohibited by 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8). If you believe that you have been the victim of whistleblower retaliation, you may file a written complaint (Form OSC-11) with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel at 1730 M Street NW., Suite 218, Washington, DC or online through the OSC Web site Retaliation for Engaging in Protected Activity A Federal agency cannot retaliate against an employee or applicant because that individual exercises his or her rights under any of the Federal antidiscrimination or whistleblower protection laws listed above. If you believe that you are the victim of retaliation for engaging in protected activity, you must follow, as appropriate, the procedures described in the Antidiscrimination Laws and Whistleblower Protection Laws sections or, if applicable, the administrative or negotiated grievance procedures in order to pursue any legal remedy. Disciplinary Actions Under the existing laws, each agency retains the right, where appropriate, to discipline a Federal employee for conduct that is inconsistent with Federal Antidiscrimination and Whistleblower Protection Laws up to and including removal. If OSC has initiated an investigation under 5 U.S.C. 1214, however, according to 5 U.S.C. 1214(f), agencies must seek approval from the Special Counsel to discipline employees for, among other activities, engaging in prohibited retaliation. Nothing in the No FEAR Act SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 40
43 alters existing laws or permits an agency to take unfounded disciplinary action against a Federal employee or to violate the procedural rights of a Federal employee who has been accused of discrimination. Additional Information For further information regarding the No FEAR Act regulations, refer to 5 CFR part 724. You may also contact the Office of Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity (Headquarters), the appropriate Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity office (Regions), or the Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity Manager (Office of Disability Adjudication and Review). Additional information regarding Federal antidiscrimination, whistleblower protection and retaliation laws can be found at the EEOC Web site and the OSC Web site Existing Rights Unchanged Pursuant to section 205 of the No FEAR Act, neither the Act nor this notice creates, expands or reduces any rights otherwise available to any employee, former employee or applicant under the laws of the United States, including the provisions of law specified in 5 U.S.C. 2302(d). SSA No FEAR Act FY 2013 Report Page 41
Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act Report. Fiscal Years 2004-2006. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act Report Fiscal Years 2004-2006 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission March 2007 -2- TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary...
Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation (No FEAR) Act Training
INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND Updated Dec 09 Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation (No FEAR) Act Training Our Mission: Our mission is to provide the Army the installation
ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION
Director of Administration and Management ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION SUBJECT: Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and Diversity Programs References: See Enclosure 1 NUMBER 31 August 19, 2013 EEOD, WHS 1.
NOTIFICATION AND FEDERAL EMPLOYEE ANTIDISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION ACT OF 2002
NOTIFICATION AND FEDERAL EMPLOYEE ANTIDISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION ACT OF 2002 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 09:01 May 20, 2002 Jkt 099139 PO 00174 Frm 00001 Fmt 6579 Sfmt 6579 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL174.107 APPS10 PsN:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE DIRECTIVE 4300.5 4/6/04 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE DIRECTIVE 4300.5 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM I. PURPOSE This Directive establishes policy, procedures and responsibilities
Whistleblower Program
AUDITOR OF STATE Washington State Auditor s Office WA S H I N G T O N NOV 11, 1889 Independence Respect Integrity Whistleblower Program Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the Whistleblower Program?
Whistleblower Program
AUDITOR OF STATE WA S H I N G T O N NOV 11, 1889 Washington State Auditor s Office Whistleblower Program Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the Whistleblower Program? Independence Respect Integrity
A MESSAGE FROM THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Disciplinary Best practices and advisory GuiDelines under the no Fear act September 2008 A MESSAGE FROM THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT I am pleased to release the report Disciplinary
Wendy Musell Stewart & Musell, LLP
Wendy Musell Stewart & Musell, LLP In 2011, the federal government is the Nation's largest employer with about 2.0 million civilian employees. 600,000 employees approximately in the US Postal Service Laws
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaint & Investigation Guideline Number 200-002b-AOG Responsible Office Human Resources Date Revised 01/30/2014
Title Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaint & Investigation Guideline Number 200-002b-AOG Responsible Office Human Resources Date Revised 01/30/2014 1. Purpose The SCA is committed to providing
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT. EEO Publication 133 October 2012
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT EEO Publication 133 October 2012 WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT EEO Publication 133 October 2012 Contents Introduction 3 EEO Laws 4 Administrative Process for Complaints of Illegal
EEO Database System - icomplaints
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT OCTOBER 13, 2015 EEO Database System - icomplaints Does the CFPB use the information to benefit or make a determination about an individual? Yes. What is the purpose? Manage and
3 FAM 1500 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
3 FAM 1500 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 3 FAM 1511 POLICY 3 FAM 1511.1 State 3 FAM 1510 EEO GENERAL (CT:PER-780; 08-04-2015) (Office of Origin: S/OCR) a. The Department of State provides equal opportunity
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION National Policy
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION National Policy ORDER 1400.8A Effective Date 05/16/12 SUBJ: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program
GAO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. The Policy Framework in the Federal Workplace and the Roles of EEOC and OPM
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate April 2005 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY The
SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS UNDER FEDERAL, STATE, and CITY EEO LAWS
SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS UNDER FEDERAL, STATE, and CITY EEO LAWS I. PROTECTED CATEGORIES Protected Classes 42 USC 2000e-2(a)-(c) Prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national
SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia POLICY STATEMENT I. COVERAGE SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY This Policy Statement is addressed to all Court Services and Offender Supervision
Human Resources Training
Pierce County s training program is comparable to that in other local jurisdictions. Direct cost comparisons are difficult without more detailed discussions with providers, but it appears that outsourcing
The faculty of BGSU reaffirms that the following are an accepted part of their responsibilities as teacher-scholars:
Page 1 of 7 SECTION E: ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES Faculty members shall follow professional ethical standards in conducting the affairs of the University. These standards are articulated in the Statement
Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002. No FEAR Act Annual Report
Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 No FEAR Act Annual Report Department of Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties March 23, 2012 Message
for Managers and Supervisors
EEO Compliance Training for Managers and Supervisors Presented by Ray Wilson EEO Specialist Learning Objectives Briefly review and discuss major anti-discrimination laws. Increase awareness of workplace
NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE POLICY ON GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT
NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE POLICY ON GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT It is the policy of North Carolina Wesleyan college that unlawful gender discrimination in any form, including sexual
Harry E. Owens, IPMA-CP Adjunct Faculty, University of Georgia. U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission 1
Harry E. Owens, IPMA-CP Adjunct Faculty, University of Georgia U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission 1 What is The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission? What are the Federal Laws Prohibiting Job Discrimination?
Policy Directive 830-1 September 22, 2008. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Policy and Procedures
Policy Directive 830-1 September 22, 2008 Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Policy and Procedures Purpose: The OIG is fully committed to EEO without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin,
Administrative Bulletin
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DATE: 1/27/2015 NO. 15-03 EXPIRES: Indefinite DISTRIBUTION: A - MANAGEMENT Administrative Bulletin x B - MGMT& SUPERVISORY C - ALL EMPLOYEES SUBJECT Equal Employment
THE LAW. Equal Employment Opportunity is
Equal Employment Opportunity is THE LAW Private Employers, State and Local Governments, Educational Institutions, Employment Agencies and Labor Organizations Applicants to and employees of most private
Regulations of Florida A&M University. 10.103 Non-Discrimination Policy and Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedures.
Regulations of Florida A&M University 10.103 Non-Discrimination Policy and Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedures. (1) It is the policy of Florida A & M University that each member of the University
Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy OP 03.03
Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy OP 03.03 Policy Mississippi State University is committed to assuring that the University and its programs are free from discrimination and harassment based
CITY OF LOS ANGELES SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, AND GENDER EXPRESSION DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
CITY OF LOS ANGELES SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, AND GENDER EXPRESSION DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE The policy of the City of Los Angeles has been, and will continue to be, to promote and
The Federal EEO Process
The Federal EEO Process LULAC National Convention and Exposition Cincinnati, Ohio June 27- July 2, 2011 Overview of EEO Laws Identifying Discrimination 1 Laws Enforced by the EEOC Title VII of the Civil
Diversity in the Senior Executive Service A 2009 Excel Workshop
Diversity in the Senior Executive Service A 2009 Excel Workshop PRESENTED BY: William L. Bransford Shaw, Bransford, Veilleux & Roth, PC General Counsel Senior Executives Association 1 The Problem 2003
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT SALARIES AND EXPENSES, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT SALARIES AND EXPENSES, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BUDGET ACTIVITY 14: DEPARTMENTAL EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY SCOPE OF ACTIVITY The Office of Departmental
How To Clarify The Disclosure Of Information From Prohibited Personnel Practices
PUBLIC LAW 112 199 NOV. 27, 2012 126 STAT. 1465 Public Law 112 199 112th Congress An Act To amend chapter 23 of title 5, United States Code, to clarify the disclosures of information protected from prohibited
TIPS FOR RESPONDING TO EEOC COMPLAINTS PRESENTED BY: RICHARD D. ALANIZ
TIPS FOR RESPONDING TO EEOC COMPLAINTS PRESENTED BY: RICHARD D. ALANIZ ERA OF ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT Over the last several years, government agencies that regulate the workplace have been in a mode of aggressive
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
--S.20-- S.20 One Hundred First Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and
WHISTLEBLOWER LAW. Subtitle 3. Maryland Whistleblower Law in the Executive Branch of State Government.
WHISTLEBLOWER LAW Subtitle 3. Maryland Whistleblower Law in the Executive Branch of State Government. 5-301. Applicability. This subtitle applies to all employees and State employees who are applicants
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE EEO MD - 110
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE EEO MD - 110 TO THE HEADS OF FEDERAL AGENCIES EFFECTIVE DATE: November 9, 1999 1. SUBJECT. FEDERAL SECTOR COMPLAINTS PROCESSING MANUAL 2. PURPOSE. The
Chapter 07300 and 07400 SUPERSEDES MANAGEMENT BULLETIN 99-09
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DATE: 07/23/03 NO. 03-07 EXPIRES: Indefinite DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE JUS 400 (REVISED 7/85) DISTRIBUTION: A - MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT BULLETIN B - MGMT & SUPERVISORY X C - ALL EMPLOYEES
U.S. Department of Agriculture EEOC FORM 715-01 PART E
U.S. Department of Agriculture EEOC FORM 715-01 PART E U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission FEDERAL AGENCY ANNUAL EEO PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Department of Agriculture For Period Covering October
Minimizing Employee Retaliation: Do the Right Thing! Ashley E. Bonner, WSO-CST Senior Risk Control Consultant Trident Public Risk Solutions
Minimizing Employee Retaliation: Do the Right Thing! Ashley E. Bonner, WSO-CST Senior Risk Control Consultant Trident Public Risk Solutions Roadmap 1. Definition of Retaliation 2. Frequency & Severity
DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY (DHRA) EQUAL EMPLOYEMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM HANDBOOK
DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY (DHRA) EQUAL EMPLOYEMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM HANDBOOK OCTOBER 1, 2014 1 EEO PROGRAM OVERVIEW It is Defense Human Resources Activity (DHRA) policy to ensure all employees
FY2010 Summary of Performance and Financial Information
FY2010 Summary of Performance and Financial Information U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 (www.osc.gov) About This Report This Report summarizes
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 8.7
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 8.7 Issued Date: 10-21-11 Effective Date: 10-21-11 Updated Date: SUBJECT: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT COMPLAINT PROCEDURES 1. POLICY A. The Philadelphia Police Department
S. 274 and H.R. 985. YES YES Language Identical. Sec. 1 (b) Sec. 2 (a) NO YES
1. Overturns existing hostile case law from Federal Circuit Court of Appeals and restores definition of any disclosure. Government Accountability Project National Office 1612 K Street, N.W. Suite 1100
OSOS BUSINESS RULES AND DEFINITIONS REFERENCE GUIDE
POLICIES RELATED TO JOB ORDERS Federal minimum wage - The Federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour with health insurance benefits provided by employer and received by employee; minimum wage is $8.25 per
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
ADAMS ML081410105 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Privacy Impact Assessment (Designed to collect the information necessary to make relevant determinations regarding the applicability of the Privacy
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1. In exchange for the commitment between the(agency Name), hereinafter referred to as the Agency, and(complainant name), hereinafter referred to as the Complainant, collectively referred
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT MANUAL
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT MANUAL Personnel Directive Subject: PROCEDURE FOR PREVENTING AND/OR RESOLVING PROBLEMS RELATED TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF LOS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, et al, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 04-4126 ) THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC. ) ) Defendant.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Elaine McArthur Outreach and Training Manager
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Elaine McArthur Outreach and Training Manager November 14, 2013 U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission www.eeoc.gov The EEOC is the key civil rights agency
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICY PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICY PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE I. POLICY a. Protected Categories The State of New Jersey is committed to providing every State employee and prospective State employee
Your Rights as an Employee
Your Rights as an Employee Federal discrimination laws provide basic rights for job applicants and employees. The laws apply to applicants, employees, and former employees. Full-time, part-time, seasonal,
CHAPTER ONE EEOC COMPLAINT PROCESS OVERVIEW
CHAPTER ONE EEOC COMPLAINT PROCESS OVERVIEW I. INTRODUCTION Federal employees with complaints of discrimination are entitled to have those complaints heard by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Bruce Schundler and Sara Schundler (together the Complainants ) and the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, (the Agency ), acting by and through its
Procedure 1B.1.1 Report/Complaint of Discrimination/Harassment Investigation and Resolution
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System Procedures Chapter 1B System Organization and Administration / Equal Education and Employment Opportunity Report/Complaint of Discrimination/Harassment
This grievance resolution procedure establishes guidelines for the prompt and equitable
Employee Grievance Resolution Procedures... 1 I. Grievance Manager Designation... 2 II. Definition and Scope... 2 A. Promotion... 2 B. Classification... 3 C. Discipline... 3 D. Leave... 3 E. Employee Performance
Howard Shapiro Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman U.S. Department of Labor
Howard Shapiro Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman U.S. Department of Labor The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 directs the DOL Inspector General to designate a Whistleblower Protection
STATE OF CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL BRANCH EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PLAN. 2015-2016 (Period Ending 12/31/2016)
STATE OF CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL BRANCH EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PLAN 2015-2016 (Period Ending 12/31/2016) STATE OF CONNECTICUT ~ JUDICIAL BRANCH EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PLAN EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT
ENDORSEMENT NO: This endorsement, effective 12:01 am, policy number forms part of issued to: by: THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT
The Coca-Cola Company
The Coca-Cola Company EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY STATEMENT 1.0 Policy Statement and Purpose The Coca-Cola Company is an Equal Opportunity Employer and maintains a work environment
INFORMATION ABOUT FILING A WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE WITH THE OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL IMPORTANT
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL Form OSC-12 (202) 254-3640 / (800) 572-2249 OMB Control No. 3255-0002 Exp. Date: 2/28/14 INFORMATION ABOUT FILING A WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE WITH THE OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
How To Handle A Wrongdoer In A State Agency
NASSAU COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY This Policy is adopted pursuant to the provisions of the Public Authorities Accountability Act of 2005 and the Public Authorities Reform
4014.2. PERSONNEL All Staff Permanent Personnel Conditions of Employment Equal Employment Opportunity/Anti-Harassment
PERSONNEL All Staff Permanent Personnel Conditions of Employment Equal Employment Opportunity/Anti-Harassment 4014.2 It is the policy of the Clintonville Public School District that no person may be illegally
Moreover, sexual harassment is a violation of federal, state and county fair employment laws.
Sexual harassment interferes with a productive working environment, interjects irrelevant considerations into personnel decisions and generally demeans employees who are victims of harassment. Moreover,
Anti-discrimination Laws: North Carolina
View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/w-000-2332 Anti-discrimination Laws: North Carolina J. TRAVIS HOCKADAY, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, WITH PRACTICAL
Complaint Policy and Procedure
Complaint Policy and Procedure Policy Statement This policy is intended to provide fair and prompt consideration to all staff complaints. The University encourages all staff to use the complaint procedure
Department of Homeland Security DHS Directives System Directive Number: 256-01 Revision Number: 00. Issue Date: ANTI HARASSMENT POLICY
I. Purpose Department of Homeland Security DHS Directives System Directive Number: 256-01 Revision Number: 00 Issue Date: ANTI HARASSMENT POLICY This Directive is intended to prohibit and prevent harassment
US Department of Health and Human Services. Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management (ASAM) Office of Diversity Management and EEO (ODME)
US Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management (ASAM) Office of Diversity Management and EEO (ODME) EEO and Diversity Policy and Procedures Manual [Version
PLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013.
PLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013. TOYOTA ASSOCIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ( T-ADR ): Summary Description
August 2007 Education and Membership Development Department
August 2007 Education and Membership Development Department Table of Contents Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 3 What is Sexual Harassment? 3 4 How Can Sexual Harassment Occur? 4 5 When is an
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Fiscal Year 2015 Statutory Review of Restrictions on Directly Contacting Taxpayers July 7, 2015 Reference Number: 2015-30-061 This report has cleared the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission Commodity Whistleblower Incentives and Protection
Commodity Futures Trading Commission Commodity Whistleblower Incentives and Protection (7 U.S.C. 26) i 26. Commodity whistleblower incentives and protection (a) Definitions. In this section: (1) Covered
G O General Accounting Office
United States G O General Accounting Office Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of the General Counsel B-247348 June 22, 1992 Mr. John W. Rensbarger Inspector General The Library of Congress Washington, D.C.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a Windmill Inn of Ashland, Defendant.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR ADAAA Case Repository Labor and Employment Law Program 11-30-2001 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a
Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection
Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection 15 USC 78u-6 (As added by P.L. 111-203.) 15 USC 78u-6 78u-6. Securities whistleblower incentives and protection (a) Definitions. In this section the following
STATE OF DELAWARE Office of Management and Budget, Human Resource Management
STATE OF DELAWARE Office of Management and Budget, Human Resource Management Guidelines on Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and Affirmative Action (AA) Introduction These guidelines are written to help
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
2014 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY P O L I C Y STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES TO BE UTILIZED BY CITY AGENCIES CITY OF NEW YORK BILL DE BLASIO Mayor LISETTE CAMILO Commissioner Department of Citywide Administrative
DoD Whistleblower Protection
DoD Whistleblower Protection Appropriated Fund Civilians What You Need to Know Department of Defense Inspector General Patrick Gookin DoD Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman [email protected]
Undocumented Workers Employment Rights
Undocumented Workers Employment Rights YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS 1. What legal rights do I have as an undocumented worker? With a few exceptions, undocumented workers enjoy the legal rights and remedies provided
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico New Mexico has a pretty strong state whistleblower law: Scoring 72 out of a possible 100 points; Ranking 4 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of
ARTICLE V. DISCRIMINATION AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY
ARTICLE V. DISCRIMINATION AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY Sec. 24-90. Policy. (a) It is the policy of the city that no individual with a disability shall, on the basis of a disability, be excluded
