Appendix E: UWHC Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Antifungal Drugs

Transcription

1 Appendix E: UWHC Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Antifungal Drugs Guidelines developed by UWHC Antimicrobial Use Subcommittee and the Drug Policy Program (DPP) Authors: Barry Fox, MD; Dennis Maki, MD; David Andes, MD Coordination: Sara Shull, PharmD, MBA, Manager Drug Policy Program Reviewed by: David Andes, MD; Barry Fox MD; Dennis Maki, MD; Carol Spiegel, PhD; Andrew Urban, MD; Brad Kahl, MD; Walter Longo, MD; Mark Juckett. MD; Natalie Callander, MD Approved By P&T Committee: September 2003 Last Reviewed: February 2007 Next Scheduled Review Date: June 2011 A. Management of Patients with Documented or Probable Invasive Fungal Infections 1.0 Candida Infections 1.1 There are no data to indicate that lipid-associated IV amphotericin B is superior therapeutically to conventional amphotericin B in adequate doses ( mg/kg/day). 1.2 For Candida bloodstream infections, echinocandins may be marginally superior to conventional IV amphotericin B. 1,2,3 Three to ten days of echinocandin therapy with stepdown to oral fluconazole may be considered as one standard of care. 1.3 For C. albicans infections, IV fluconazole ( mg/day) generally gives results therapeutically comparable to conventional IV amphotericin B (and presumably echinocandin). 4,5 1.4 For non-albicans Candida infections, fluconazole may fail because of reduced susceptibility. 6 Susceptibility testing for Candida glabrata isolated from sterile body sites is automatically sent for susceptibility testing. Other testing is available upon request. An echinocandin or IV amphotericin B may be preferred. 7,8 1.5 Voriconazole has recently been approved for the treatment of candidemia, but clinical experience is limited; published data available at the time of of this document are limited to salvage therapy Deep Aspergillus Infections 2.1 There are no data that conclusively show the lipid-associated amphotericin preparations are therapeutically superior to conventional IV amphotericin B in full doses ( 1 mg/kg/day). 10 However, since it is essential to use full dose IV amphotericin B for filamentous fungal infections (>1 mg/kg/d), a dosage which produces substantial nephrotoxicity, in general, lipid-associated preparations of amphotericin B (5 mg/kg/day) are preferable for documented filamentous fungal infection, especially deep Aspergillus or Zygomycetes infections. 2.2 Voriconazole appears to be superior to all IV amphotericin B products for invasive Aspergillus infections and is recommended for initial therapy of probable or documented invasive Aspergillus infections. 11 Echinocandins have also been shown to be effective for invasive aspergillosis in patients refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy. 12

2 2.3 Recent animal data and some recent clinical data suggest that for documented or highly suggestive invasive Aspergillus infections, the combination of voriconazole with an echinocandin may be therapeutically superior to the use of either drug alone However, a randomized trial by the national mycoses study group is in progress and results should be available shortly in This trial limits combination therapy to 14 days, and not indefinitely. 2.4 General comments regarding Lipid-based Amphotericin products: There are no data to suggest that liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome ) is superior to amphotericin B lipid complex (Abelcet, ABLC), 18 except for intracranial fungal infections or histoplasmosis, 24 where AmBisome may be more effective. 19 There are limited data that indicate that AmBisome is slightly less nephrotoxic than amphotericin B lipid complex. AmBisome is the current UWHC formulary lipid-associated amphotericin product at this time 3.0 CNS Cryptococcal Infections 3.1 In general, an amphotericin product plus flucytosine remains the regimen of first choice. 20, For patients unable to tolerate this regimen (e.g., patients with advanced AIDS), fluconazole mg/day is recommended Echinocandins are not effective for treatment of cryptococcal infection. 3.4 Data suggest voriconazole or posaconazole may be useful for fluconazole failures but it should not be used as primary therapy For indefinite suppressive therapy (e.g., in advanced AIDS), fluconazole is recommended Other filamentous fungal infections/endemic mycoses 4.1 Some fungal species, such as Zygomycetes, Fusarium or Scedosporium, are resistant to amphotericin B or voriconazole. 25 In general, with infections caused by these organisms, in vitro susceptibility testing is strongly recommended and ID consultation should be sought. 4.2 For treatment of histoplasmosis, blastomycosis and coccidiomycosis, the treatment of choice for life-threatening infections remains an amphotericin-based product, and AmBisome is preferred at this time for histoplasmosis. 26 For less severe infections or for step-down therapy, use of itraconazole for histoplasmosis and blastomycosis is acceptable. For coccidiomycosis, fluconazole should be untilized Data supporting the use of voriconazole or posaconazole for the treatment of endemic mycosis are lacking, but there is some accumulating evidence that voriconazole may be effective. 4.4 Posaconazole has been approved for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies. It has in vitro activity against Zygomycetes, and may be considered for adjunctive therapy with amphotericin for such infections under the guidance of an infectious disease specialist. 27,28

3 B. Antifungal Prophylaxis for BMT and Hematologic Malignancies 1.0 For allogenic BMT patients, fluconazole prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the incidence of deep Candida infections Itraconazole may be more effective than fluconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infections but is associated with more frequent GI side effects For patients with hematologic malignancies or solid tumors, no study has shown a clear benefit of antifungal prophylaxis. High-risk patients with prolonged neutropenia, however, can be individually considered for this strategy Micafungin has been approved for prophylaxis for stem cell transplant recipients, but the benefit of prophylaxis with this or other echinocandin must be weighed against the potential loss of this class of drug for therapeutic purposes Posaconazole has been approved for prophylaxis for patients with hematologic malignancies. While preliminary data is encouraging, difficulties with drug absorption and drug interactions may not make this a suitable prophylaxis alternative for all patients. Voriconazole should not be automatically substituted for patients having difficulty with posaconazole. 46, Patients with hematologic malignancies with significant GVHD >Grade 3 may be considered candidates for prophylaxis with posaconazole, or occasionally voriconazole, although evidence based medicine for the later is lacking. 48,49 C. Empiric Antifungal Therapy for the Management of Patients with Febrile Neutropenia 1.0 In patients with granulocytopenia (<500/mcL) who have had persistent fever for more than 3-5 days despite empiric antibiotic therapy (cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam, with or without tobramycin or ciprofloxacin), the addition of an antifungal drug to the empiric regimen is desirable and can reduce mortality from occult deep fungal infection. 29 These patients should ideally be screened for invasive fungal infections through serological and radiographic means. 49 Patients may be stratified by their risk of invasive fungal infections as noted below. Low risk = not high risk High risk = febrile patient with one or more of the following: Any patient with greater than 21 days of persistent neutropenia after cytotoxic chemotherapy Stem cell transplantation with neutropenia of greater than 5 days Patients with relapsed leukemia undergoing reinduction therapy with neutropenia/fever greater than 5 days Stem cell transplant with GVHD >Grade 3 with or without neutropenia/fever Any patient with greater than 7 days of neutropenia, unresponsive to 7 days of azole empiric therapy, with high suspicion of filamentous fungal infection 2.0 Conventional IV amphotericin B (at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg) and lipid-based amphotericin products (at a dose of 3-5 mg/kg) are both effective. 30,31 However, in patients who have not been receiving fluconazole prophylactically, fluconazole or itraconazole appear to give comparable results 32,33 and voriconazole may be considered for high-risk patients.

4 3.0 There is no proven role for the use of voriconazole for routine empiric therapy of neutropenic fever. In a recent multi-center randomized trial, voriconazole was marginally more effective than amphotericin B in high risk patient subgroups only and statistically inferior in other subgroups Other studies have shown that an echinocandin may be an effective alternative to lipid-based amphotericin products. 37,38 Echinocandins may be considered for use at UWHC for certain high risk patients with extensive azole experience as outlined below. Use of echinocandins must be weighed against the future risk of drug resistance. 39 In trying to decide on the optimal antifungal regimen, also assess whether patients have had prior azole antifungal therapy or prophylaxis (defined as greater than 14 days of the equivalent of 200 mg of fluconazole or itraconazole, 400 mg of voriconazole or 600mg of posaconazole in the past 3 months). Prophylaxis with voriconazole or posaconazole makes the development of invasive fungal infection much less likely. 50 Specifically also assess whether patients have been receiving posaconazole prophylaxis in a reliable fashion, including assessment of drug levels. Prophylaxis regimens should be discontinued if therapeutic choices are chosen. The suggested regimens are: Low Risk High Risk No prior azole therapy: fluconazole, itraconazole echinocandin, voriconazole AmBisome Prior fluconazole, echinocandin or echinocandin or itraconazole AmBisome AmBisome Prior posaconazole no change no change or AmBisome Prior voriconazole posaconazole or AmBisome AmBisome

5 D. Cost Comparison Drug Amphotericin B deoxycholate Amphotericin B Liposomal Amphotericin B lipid complex Anidulafungin Caspofungin Dose (70 kg patient) Cost per day 1 mg/kg/day IV daily $ mg/kg/day IV daily $ mg/kg/day IV daily Load 200 mg IV Maintenance 100 mg IV daily Load 70 mg IV Maintenance 50 mg IV daily $ $ $ $ Micafungin 100 mg IV daily $ mg IV daily $ Fluconazole Load 400 mg IV $5.37 Maintenance 200 mg IV daily $2.68 Fluconazole 200 mg PO daily $0.14 Itraconazole Load 200 mg PO TID $33.24 Maintenance 200 mg PO BID $22.16 Posaconazole 200 mg PO Q8h $82.28 Voriconazole Load 6 mg/kg IV Q12h x 2 doses Maintenance 4 mg/kg IV Q12h $ $ Voriconazole 200 mg PO BID $82.74 Comments Nonformulary; requires ID Nonformulary: requires ID Section Nonformulary; requires ID Section except for use according to the standard operating procedures of the Hematology Section

6 References: 1. Mora-Duarte J. Betts R. Rotstein C. Colombo AL. Thompson-Moya L. Smietana J. Lupinacci R. Sable C. Kartsonis N. Perfect J. Caspofungin Invasive Candidiasis Study Group. Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(25): Deresinski SC. Stevens DA. Caspofungin. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36(11): Bennett JE. Echinocandins for candidemia in adults without neutropenia. N Engl J Med 2006;355: Phillips P. Shafran S. Garber G. Rotstein C. Smaill F. Fong I. Salit I. Miller M. Williams K. Conly JM. Singer J. Ioannou S. Multicenter randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. Canadian Candidemia Study Group. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1997;16(5): Rex JH. Bennett JE. Sugar AM. Pappas PG. van der Horst CM. Edwards JE. Washburn RG. Scheld WM. Karchmer AW. Dine AP. et al. A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in patients without neutropenia. Candidemia Study Group and the National Institute. N Engl J Med 1994; 331(20): Pfaller MA. Diekema DJ. Jones RN. Sader HS. Fluit AC. Hollis RJ. Messer SA. SENTRY Participant Group. International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to Candida species: frequency of occurrence and in vitro susceptibilities to fluconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole of isolates collected from 1997 through 1999 in the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39(9): Bodey GP. Mardani M. Hanna HA. Boktour M. Abbas J. Girgawy E. Hachem RY. Kontoyiannis DP. Raad II. The epidemiology of Candida glabrata and Candida albicans fungemia in immunocompromised patients with cancer. Am J Med 2002;112(5): Wingard JR. Merz WG. Rinaldi MG. Johnson TR. Karp JE. Saral R. Increase in Candida krusei infection among patients with bone marrow transplantation and neutropenia treated prophylactically with fluconazole. N Engl J Med 1991;325(18): Ostrosky-Zeichner L. Oude Lashof AM. Kullberg BJ. Rex JH. Voriconazole salvage treatment of invasive candidiasis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;22: Dupont B. Overview of the lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Journal of Antimicrob Chemother 2002;49 Suppl 1: Herbrecht R. Denning DW. Patterson TF. Bennett JE. Greene RE. Oestmann JW. Kern WV. Marr KA. Ribaud P. Lortholary O. Sylvester R. Rubin RH. Wingard JR. Stark P. Durand C. Caillot D. Thiel E. Chandrasekar PH. Hodges MR. Schlamm HT. Troke PF. de Pauw B. Invasive Fungal Infections Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Global Aspergillus Study Group. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 2002;347(6): Maertens J, Raad I, Petrikkos G, Boogaerts M, Selleslag D, Petersen FB, Sable CA, Kartsonis NA, Ngai A, Taylor A, Patterson TF, Denning DW, Walsh TJ. Efficacy and Safety of Caspofungin for Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients Refractory to or Intolerant of Conventional Antifungal Therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39: Kirkpatrick WR. Perea S. Coco BJ. Patterson TF. Efficacy of Caspofungin alone and in combination with voriconazole in a Guinea pig model of invasive aspergillosis. Antimicrob Ag Chemother 2002;46(8): Perea S. Gonzalez G. Fothergill AW. Kirkpatrick WR. Rinaldi MG. Patterson TF. In vitro interaction of Caspofungin acetate with voriconazole against clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. Antimicrob Ag Chemother 2002;46(9): Petraitis V. Petraitiene R. Sarafandi AA. Kelaher AM. Lyman CA. Casler HE. Sein T. Groll AH. Bacher J. Avila NA. Walsh TJ. Combination therapy in treatment of experimental pulmonary aspergillosis: synergistic interaction between an antifungal triazole and an echinocandin.[comment]. J Infect Dis 2003;187(12): Marr KA, Boeckh M, Carter RA, Kim HW, Corey L. Combination antifungal therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:

7 17. Maertens J, Glasmacher A, Herbrecht R, Thiebaut A, Cordonnier C, Segal BH, Killar J, Taylor A, Kartsonis N, Patterson TF. Multicenter, noncomparative study of caspofungin in combination with other antifungals as salvage therapy in adults with invasive aspergillosis. Cancer 2006;Published online 11/13/ Wingard JR. Lipid formulations of amphotericins: are you a lumper or a splitter? Clin Infect Dis 2002;35(7): Leenders AC. Reiss P. Portegies P. Clezy K. Hop WC. Hoy J. Borleffs JC. Allworth T. Kauffmann RH. Jones P. Kroon FP. Verbrugh HA. de Marie S. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) compared with amphotericin B both followed by oral fluconazole in the treatment of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. AIDS 1997;11(12): Bennett JE. Dismukes WE. Duma RJ. Medoff G. Sande MA. Gallis H. Leonard J. Fields BT. Bradshaw M. Haywood H. McGee ZA. Cate TR. Cobbs CG. Warner JF. Alling DW. A comparison of amphotericin B alone and combined with flucytosine in the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 1979;301(3): Sobel J. Practice guidelines for the treatment of fungal infections. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30(4): Saag MS. Powderly WG. Cloud GA. Robinson P. Grieco MH. Sharkey PK. Thompson SE. Sugar AM. Tuazon CU. Fisher JF. et al. Comparison of amphotericin B with fluconazole in the treatment of acute AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. The NIAID Mycoses Study Group and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. N Engl J Med 1992;326(2): van Duin D, Cleare W, Zaragoza O, Casadevall A, Nosanchuk JD. Effects of voriconazole on Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48: Powderly WG. Saag MS. Cloud GA. Robinson P. Meyer RD. Jacobson JM. Graybill JR. Sugar AM. McAuliffe VJ. Follansbee SE. et al. A controlled trial of fluconazole or amphotericin B to prevent relapse of cryptococcal meningitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group and Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992;326(12): Pfaller MA. Messer SA. Hollis RJ. Jones RN. SENTRY Participants Group. Antifungal activities of posaconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole compared to those of itraconazole and amphotericin B against 239 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. and other filamentous fungi: report from SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, Antimicrob Ag Chemother 2002;46(4): Wheat J, Sarosi G, McKinsey D, Hamill R, Bradsher R, Johnson P, Loyd J, Kauffman C, Practice guidelines for the management of patients with histoplasmosis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30: Torres HA, Hachem RY, Chemaly, Kontoyuannus DP, Raad II. Posaconazole: a broad spectrum triazole antifungal. Lancet Infec Dis 2005;5: Greenberg RN, Mullane K, vanburik JA, Raad I, Abzug MJ, Anstead G, Herbrecht R, Langston A, Marr KA, Schiller G, Schuster M, Wingard JR, Gonzalez CE, Revankar SG, Corcoran G, Kryscio RJ, Hare R. Posaconazole as salvage therapy for zygomycosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50: Gotzsche, PC. Johansen, HK. Routine versus selective antifungal administration for control of fungal infections in patients with cancer. Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group. Cochr Database System Rev 2003; Walsh TJ. Finberg RW. Arndt C. Hiemenz J. Schwartz C. Bodensteiner D. Pappas P. Seibel N. Greenberg RN. Dummer S. Schuster M. Holcenberg JS. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340(10): Wingard JR. White MH. Anaissie E. Raffalli J. Goodman J. Arrieta A. L Amph/AMPHOTERICIN B LIPID COMPLEX Collaborative Study Group. A randomized, double-blind comparative trial evaluating the safety of liposomal amphotericin B versus amphotericin B lipid complex in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. L

8 Amph/AMPHOTERICIN B LIPID COMPLEX Collaborative Study Group. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31(5): Winston DJ. Hathorn JW. Schuster MG. Schiller GJ. Territo MC. A multicenter, randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Am J Med 2000;108(4): Boogaerts M. Winston DJ. Bow EJ. Garber G. Reboli AC. Schwarer AP. Novitzky N. Boehme A. Chwetzoff E. De Beule K. Itraconazole Neutropenia Study Group. Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2001;135(6): Persistent fever in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med 2002;346(4): Walsh TJ. Pappas P. Winston DJ. Lazarus HM. Petersen F. Raffalli J. Yanovich S. Stiff P. Greenberg R. Donowitz G. Schuster M. Reboli A. Wingard J. Arndt C. Reinhardt J. Hadley S. Finberg R. Laverdiere M. Perfect J. Garber G. Fioritoni G. Anaissie E. Lee J. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med 2002;346(4): Powers JH. Dixon CA. Goldberger MJ. Voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med 2002;346(4): Walsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, Maertens JA, Baden LR, Dmoszynska A, Cornely OA, Bourque MR, Lupinacci RJ, Sable CA, depauw BE. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med 2004;351: Klastersky J. Antifungal therapy in patients with fever and neutropenia more rational and less empirical? N Engl J Med 2004;351: Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Rare and emerging opportunistic fungal pathogens: Concern for resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42: Goodman JL. Winston DJ. Greenfield RA. Chandrasekar PH. Fox B. Kaizer H. Shadduck RK. Shea TC. Stiff P. Friedman DJ. et al. A controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 1992;326(13): Slavin MA. Osborne B. Adams R. Levenstein MJ. Schoch HG. Feldman AR. Meyers JD. Bowden RA. Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis for fungal infections after marrow transplantation--a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Infect Dis 1995;171(6): Marr KA. Seidel K. White TC. Bowden RA. Candidemia in allogeneic blood and marrow transplant recipients: evolution of risk factors after the adoption of prophylactic fluconazole. J Infect Dis 2000;181(1): Winston DJ. Maziarz RT. Chandrasekar PH. Lazarus HM. Goldman M. Blumer JL. Leitz GJ. Territo MC. Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous and oral fluconazole for long-term antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients. A multicenter, randomized trial. Ann of Intern Med 2003;138(9): Bow EJ. Laverdiere M. Lussier N. Rotstein C. Cheang MS. Ioannou S. Antifungal prophylaxis for severely neutropenic chemotherapy recipients: a meta analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials. Cancer 2002;94(12): vanburik JA, Ratanathorn V, Stepan DE, Miller CB, Lipton JH, Vesole DH, Bunin N, Wall Da, Heimenz JW, Satoi Y, Lee JM, Walsh TJ, Narional Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Mycoses Study Group. Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39: Courtney R, Sudhakar P, Laughlin M, Lim J, Batra V. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral posaconazole administered in single and multiple doses in health adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:

9 47. Courtney R, Wexler D, Radwanski E, Lim J, Laughlin M. Effect of food on the relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of posaconazole in healthy adults. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003;57: Ullmann AJ, Lipton JH, Vesole DH, Chandrasekar P, Langston A, Tarantalo SR, Greinix H, de Azvedo WM, Reddy V, Bopari N, Pedicone L, Patino H, Durrant S. Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graft-versus-host disease. New Engl J Med 2007;356: Cornely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, Perfect J, Ullmann AJ, Walsh TJ, Helfgott D, Holowiecki J, Stockelberg D, Goh Y-T, Petrini M, Hardalo C, Suresh R, Angulo-Gonzalez D. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. New Engl J Med 2007;356: Segal BH, Almyroudis NG, Battiwalla M, Herbrecht R, Perfect JR, Walsh TJ, Wingard JR. Prevention and early treatment of invasive fungal infection in patients with cancer and neutropenia and in stem cell transplant recipients in the era of newer broad-spectrum antifungal agents and diagnostic adjuncts. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44: Chapman SW, Bradsher RW, Campbell DG, Pappas PG, Kauffman CA. Practice guidelines for the management of patients with blastomycosis..clin Infect Dis 2008;46: Pappas PG, Rex JH, Sobel JD, Filler SG, Dismukes WE, Walsh TJ, Edwards JE. Guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48: Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL, Graybill JR, Haymill RJ, Harrison TS, Larsen RA, Lortholary O, Nguyen M-H, Pappas PG, Powderly WG, Singh N, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50: Wingard JR, Carter SL, Walsh TJ, et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of fluconazole versus voriconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infection after allogeneneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 2010;116(24):