Environmental Appeal Board
|
|
- Laurence Bailey
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Environmental Appeal Board APPEAL NO. 93/25 - WILDLIFE In the matter of appeal under section 103 Wildlife Act, S.B.C. 1982, c.57. BETWEEN: R. Lynn Ross APPELLANT AND: Deputy Director Of Wildlife RESPONDENT BEFORE: A Panel of the Environmental Appeal Board Katherine Hough, Panel Chair Elizabeth Keay, Member Harry Higgins, Member DATE OF HEARING: October 23 & October 24, 1996 PLACE OF HEARING: Fort St. John, B.C. APPEARING: For the Appellant: David Jenkins, Q.C., Counsel For the Respondent: J. McBride, Counsel APPEAL This was an appeal against the decision of Deputy Director, Mr. William Munro, cancelling Mr. Ross s guide outfitter certificate and suspending his guide outfitter licence. The authority for the Panel of the Environmental Appeal Board to hear this appeal is found in section 11 of the Environment Management Act and section 103 of the Wildlife Act. BACKGROUND Mr. Lynn Ross ( Ross ) is a guide outfitter with more than 40 years of experience whose territory was located north of Fort St. John in the Pink Mountain area. Ross had no difficulty with the Fish and Wildlife Branch of the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks until the 1970s when he imported buffalo as domestic stock into his territory. These matters were not resolved until after a lengthy process ending in 1990 which left Ross bitter about the actions of the government and the Conservation Officer Service. When Ross applied to renew his guide outfitter certificate in 1993, he was informed that the Regional Manager was concerned about his guiding activities and that a section 52 hearing would be convened to determine whether the certificate should be
2 APPEAL NO. 93/25 Page 2 renewed. In the meantime, Ross applied to transfer his certificate to his daughter pursuant to section 63(1) of the Wildlife Act. Subsection 63(1) states: (1) The privileges conferred in a guide outfitter s licence or certificate may not be transferred without the authorization of the regional manager. This application was denied by the Regional Manager pending the outcome of the section 52 hearing to determine whether to renew his certificate. The section 52 hearing was held in the absence of Ross and his lawyer. The Regional Manager decided not to renew Ross s certificate. Ross s lawyer successfully appealed the ruling in the Supreme Court of British Columbia and the Regional Manager renewed Ross s certificate and licence for a period of one year. He then advised Ross that a section 62 hearing would be conducted. The relevant portions of section 62 state: (1) Where a person who holds or applies to renew a guide outfitter s licence...is convicted of an offence under this Act or the regulations or does not comply with the conditions contained in his licence or certificate or for another cause that the regional manager considers reasonable, the regional manager may conduct a hearing to determine whether the person should continue to enjoy the privileges afforded him by the licence or certificate and may do any one or more of the following: (a) suspend, cancel or refuse to renew the person's licence or certificate; (b) amend the licence or certificate to specify a different area in which the person is authorized to operate; (c) in the case of a guide outfitter, amend the licence to further limit the numbers, age and sex of game in respect of which he may guide; (d) amend the licence or certificate to require the person to meet other restrictions considered appropriate; (e) in the case of an angling guide, reduce or cancel an angler day quota attached to that person's licence. (2) A person, in respect of whose licence or certificate a hearing is to be held, shall be given reasonable notice of the time and place for the hearing and the provisions of section 103 apply. Out of an abundance of caution the Regional Manager requested the Deputy Director to conduct the hearing. The section 62 hearing was held on June 24, 1993, by the Deputy Director concerning 21 allegations of misconduct by Ross. This hearing was conducted in the absence of both Ross and his lawyer.
3 APPEAL NO. 93/25 Page 3 On September 1, 1993, the Deputy Director cancelled Ross s certificate and suspended his licence but gave him 15 days to finish any current hunts and to remove hunters from his territory. He held that there was sufficient evidence to find that 16 of the allegations had been made out. These allegations include hunting moose, elk and goat during closed seasons as well as shooting an undersized sheep and then trying to legalize it. The Deputy Director also commented in his written reasons that any transfer of Ross s certificate prior to the cancellation of his certificate would not be proper. Ross was also charged under three separate Provincial Court Informations with offences under the Wildlife Act in 1992 and In 1996 Crown Counsel stayed all charges against Ross. This matter was appealed to the Environmental Appeal Board by Ross on the grounds that: a) the Regional Manager, Dave Zirul, unfairly refused to allow Ross to transfer his certificate and licence prior to the section 62 hearing; b) the Deputy Director and the Regional Manager were unfairly biased against Ross; c) the evidence heard at the section 62 hearing was tainted by not being given under oath and by being a repeat of the evidence taken at the section 52 hearing which was later overturned; d) the Deputy Director unlawfully exercised his discretion in cancelling Ross s guide outfitter s certificate and suspending his guide outfitter licence; e) Ross had not been given full opportunity to present his case due to the actions of his former lawyer. The order sought by Ross was that his guide outfitter certificate and licence be reinstated or, in the alternative, that he be allowed to transfer his certificate. ISSUES AND EVIDENCE During the appeal several issues were identified and the grounds of appeal were narrowed. Ross ultimately conceded that the Deputy Director, having found that 16 allegations of misconduct under the Wildlife Act had been made out, could properly cancel his certificate. Accordingly, this ground of appeal was abandoned. The Panel has addressed the remaining issues as follows: Issue 1. Perception of Bias Due to difficulties concerning the importation of buffalo and the almost 20 years of charges and counter-charges between Ross and the Fish and Wildlife Branch, Ross was concerned that he was unfairly singled out for investigation by the Conservation Officer Service. One of Ross s guides, Mr. Parenteau, was questioned by Senior Conservation
4 APPEAL NO. 93/25 Page 4 Officer Bruce Voth ( Voth ) and received the distinct impression that Voth was out to get Ross. Ross also pointed to the staying of all Provincial Court charges to buttress his argument that the evidence relied upon by the Deputy Director in the section 62 hearing was insufficient to support charges and confirmed his suspicion that the Deputy Director was biased against him. Voth testified that, during his investigation of Ross, he made promises or veiled threats to some of Ross s guides in order to obtain evidence against Ross. Voth testified that this was part of his investigation technique and that any promises or veiled threats did not arise from any preconceived dislike of Ross or desire to see Ross charged with offences under the Wildlife Act. In the Panel s view, it is unfortunate that Ross s difficulties with respect to the buffalo were so closely followed by Voth s investigation but there was no evidence produced that linked these two activities to support a finding of conspiracy or biased intent against Ross. The Panel is not convinced that Voth acted out of malice or bias in his investigation of Ross s activities. Nor is the Panel convinced that either the Regional Manager or the Deputy Director were biased against Ross. While the staying of charges might have had a bearing on the Deputy Director s decision, section 62 of the Wildlife Act allows a Regional Manager (or Deputy Director) to conduct a hearing for another cause that the regional manager considers reasonable. In this case, 21 allegations of misconduct was sufficient other cause for the section 62 hearing to be conducted. Ross s perception of bias also arose from the fact that the Regional Manager and the Deputy Director are both employees of the Fish and Wildlife Branch and had a working relationship. Also, it is clear that the Regional Manager was sufficiently concerned about a perception of bias that it was at his request that the Deputy Director conducted the section 62 hearing after the section 52 hearing was overturned. However, mere opportunity for bias does not prove bias and Ross has been unable to provide this Panel with proof of actual bias or a reasonable perception of bias. Issue 2. Lack of opportunity to present evidence Ross was concerned that he was unable to tell his side of the story because of the actions of his former lawyer. His lawyer had advised Ross not to be present at the section 62 hearing and the lawyer himself left after the Deputy Director refused to adjourn the hearing pending the outcome of the Provincial Court matters. On appeal, Mr. Justice Lowry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia upheld the Deputy Director s decision to proceed with the hearing prior to a trial in the absence of either Ross or his lawyer. While it was unfortunate that Ross did not provide evidence at the section 62 hearing due to his lawyer s advice, he was given the opportunity on this appeal to address some of the allegations that were before the Deputy Director. While the Panel is satisfied that the Deputy Director proceeded appropriately with the evidence that was
5 APPEAL NO. 93/25 Page 5 before him, the Panel agrees that if Ross s evidence had been presented to the Deputy Director, the outcome might well have been different. Issue 3. Refusal to allow transfer Prior to the section 52 hearing, Ross s application to transfer his certificate to his daughter was denied pending the hearing. Ross testified that he did not know that he had the right to appeal the refusal. He did not pursue a transfer with Mr. Watson prior to the section 62 hearing and felt unable to proceed after reading the Deputy Director s comment in the decision that any transfer of Ross s certificate prior to cancellation of the certificate would not be proper. Ross argued that the Deputy Director unduly fettered his discretion, and that of the Regional Manager, by commenting on the propriety of Ross transferring his certificate before the cancellation took effect. The one line comment by the Deputy Director had the effect of suspending Ross s negotiations with Mr. Watson. Ross testified that he had lost approximately $300,000 per annum in business revenue since the cancellation of his certificate. He also noted that other guide outfitters who had been convicted of Wildlife offences had been allowed to transfer their certificates and that he was not treated fairly. The lawyer for the Deputy Director argued that the Panel could not examine this issue and that it must confine itself to the simple issue of whether the Deputy Director acted within his jurisdiction in cancelling the certificate. This Panel has determined that it has jurisdiction to examine the issues raised by Ross, including the issue surrounding the transfer of the certificate. It is obvious from Voth s testimony before this Panel, as well as a review of the Deputy Director s decision, that the issue of transfer was never addressed by any witnesses, nor the lawyer, at the section 62 hearing. This Panel disagrees with the Deputy Director s lawyer that the Deputy Director s comment was of little importance. The effect of the Deputy Director s one liner from his September 1, 1993, decision has been to remove the opportunity of the Regional Manager to consider any request for transfer and effectively barred Ross from even bringing an application pending this appeal. The Deputy Director effectively decided a matter that was not before him and, in doing so, fettered the discretion of the Regional Manger. The cases of Prinz, a section 62 hearing conducted by the Ministry of Environment (Hearing No. 92/04) and Hansen, an appeal to the Environmental Appeal Board (Appeal No. 88/05 - Wildlife), presented by Ross, were situations where despite convictions under the Wildlife Act, the guide outfitters were allowed to transfer their certificates. Ross was never convicted of any offences and the allegations do not appear to be any more severe than those stated in either of the above noted cases. If the intent was to prevent any future infractions, the cancellation and suspension have been effective. Ross has given up his guiding activities and does not require further discipline to prevent any future offences or breaches of the Wildlife Act.
6 APPEAL NO. 93/25 Page 6 It was also clear from Ross s testimony that some of the allegations against him arose due to his misunderstanding about hunting boundaries. Voth agreed that this evidence reduced the seriousness of the allegations. Voth also testified that, with the evidence presented by Ross with respect to the killing of a stone sheep, he would no longer object to Ross transferring his certificate. DECISION In making this Decision, the Panel of the Environmental Appeal Board has carefully considered the evidence and testimony presented. It is this Panel s duty on appeal to determine whether the Deputy Director properly exercised his discretion uninfluenced by irrelevant considerations and not arbitrarily or illegally (Olson v Walker et. al. (August 21, 1989), Duncan 2286 (B.C.S.C.)). The Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks Policy clearly directs that the Regional Manager or Director shall not authorize the transfer of the right to guide under the guide outfitter licence or certificate until a decision is made by the Regional Manager. If the decision...is to cancel then the right to guide...is forfeited to the Crown. (emphasis added) In considering disciplinary action against Ross, the Deputy Director can exercise all the powers of a Regional Manager pursuant to section 102 of the Wildlife Act. The Deputy Director could have refused to allow Ross to transfer his certificate if the issue of the transfer had been argued before him at the section 62 hearing. Counsel for the Regional Manager did not raise the issue of transfer, nor was there any evidence before the Deputy Director about the suitability of allowing Ross to transfer his certificate. The Deputy Director had either to hear evidence or allow the Regional Manager to exercise his own discretion in considering a transfer. In making a decision without evidence or submissions, the Deputy Director effectively went beyond his own power and fettered the discretion of the Regional Manager. It is the decision of this Panel that the Deputy Director: 1. Was not biased and properly exercised his discretion in deciding to cancel Mr. Ross s certificate and to suspend his licence; and 2. Erred in law by deciding an issue not properly before him thereby fettering the ability of the Regional Manager to exercise an independent discretion. Accordingly, the matter is sent back to the Deputy Director with the following directions: 1. The Deputy Director shall renew the Appellant s Guide Outfitters Certificate for a period of 90 days to allow the Appellant to file a formal application for transfer of the said certificate.
7 APPEAL NO. 93/25 Page 7 2. The Deputy Director (or the Regional Manager if the Deputy Director so delegates) shall decide whether to authorize a transfer and the conditions of any such transfer. If the Appellant fails to file a transfer application or having filed one, is denied the transfer, the Certificate will cease to exist. Katherine L. Hough, Panel Chair Environmental Appeal Board February 14, 1997
How To Be Fair
PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS DEVELOPED BY THE FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONS IN CONSULTATION WITH THE INSPECTOR OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS I. PREAMBLE
More informationCriminal Trial. If You Can t Get a Lawyer for Your. How to Make a Rowbotham Application
If You Can t Get a Lawyer for Your Criminal Trial How to Make a Rowbotham Application Denied legal aid? Can t afford a lawyer? Facing a serious/complex criminal charge? December 2012 2012, Legal Services
More informationRobert Collingwood Strother
2012 LSBC 14 Report issued: May 03, 2012 Citation issued: September 8, 2009 The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning Robert
More informationIf you can t get a lawyer for your criminal trial:
If you can t get a lawyer for your criminal trial: How to make an application to have a lawyer appointed (Rowbotham Application) if you have been denied representation through Legal Aid Alberta and cannot
More informationTHE AHOUSAHT, EHATTESAHT, HESQUIAHT, MOWACHAHT/MUCHALAHT, AND TLA-O-QUI-AHT INDIAN BANDS AND NATIONS. And MINISTER OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS
Date: 20150227 Docket: T-70-15 Citation: 2015 FC 253 Vancouver, British Columbia, February 27, 2015 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Manson BETWEEN: THE AHOUSAHT, EHATTESAHT, HESQUIAHT, MOWACHAHT/MUCHALAHT,
More informationPractices and Procedures for Appeals under Section 11.1 of the School Act
Practices and Procedures for Appeals under Section 11.1 of the School Act 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 4 PART 1 GENERAL... 5 1. Definitions... 5 2. Communication through Registrar... 5 3. Filing
More informationThe Interior Designers Act
1 The Interior Designers Act being Chapter I-10.02 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1995 (effective June 19, 1997) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan 2009, c.t-23.01; 2010, c.19 and 20; and 2014,
More informationDRINKING AND DRIVING OFFENCE
What to do if you are charged with a DRINKING AND DRIVING OFFENCE This booklet is not about provincial Motor Vehicle Act penalties for drinking and driving. This guide explains what normally happens when
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. August 20, 2015
RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE August 20, 2015 INDEX PART 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 PART 2 GENERAL RULES... 2 Rule 1 How the Rules are Applied... 2 Applying the Rules... 2 Conflict with the Act... 2 Rule 2
More informationMISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM
MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM Discipline System Clients have a right to expect a high level of professional service from their lawyer. In Missouri, lawyers follow a code of ethics known as the Rules
More informationHow To Write A Medical Laboratory
1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS c.m-9.3 The Medical Laboratory Technologists Act being Chapter M-9.3 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1995 (effective February 1, 1996) as amended by the Statutes of
More informationNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
PEOPLE AND ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT HUMAN RESOURCES DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE Author/Role Fiona Munro, Human Resources Date of Risk Assessment (if applicable) N/A Date of Equality Impact Assessment
More informationIn the Matter of the Reinstatement Petition of Irving A. August, P-10296, Petitioner/Appellant. ADB 241-88. Decided December 22, 1989 BOARD OPINION
In the Matter of the Reinstatement Petition of Irving A. August, P-10296, Petitioner/Appellant. ADB 241-88 Decided December 22, 1989 BOARD OPINION The Attorney Discipline Board has considered the Petition
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Toor v. Harding, 2013 BCSC 1202 Amrit Toor and Intech Engineering Ltd. Date: 20130705 Docket: S125365 Registry: Vancouver Plaintiffs Thomas
More informationR. v. Powley. In Brief what the Court said. The Powley Story. A Summary of the Supreme Court of Canada Reasons for Judgment
Pape & Salter Barristers & solicitors R. v. Powley A Summary of the Supreme Court of Canada Reasons for Judgment In Brief what the Court said This Powley Summary was written and prepared by Jean Teillet.
More informationThe Land Surveyors and Professional Surveyors Act
1 LAND SURVEYORS AND PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS c. L-3.1 The Land Surveyors and Professional Surveyors Act being Chapter L-3.1 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1995 (effective January 1, 1997) as amended by
More informationThe N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463. (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense
The N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463 (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense The North Carolina State Bar Disciplinary Hearing Commission did not err
More informationLAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT. IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act; and
LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT INTRODUCTION IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act; and IN THE MATTER OF a hearing (the "Hearing") regarding the conduct of Austin Nguyen, a Member of
More informationRecommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 7, 2013, the Petition for
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of ANTHONY L. CIANFRANI PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT No. 1335 Disciplinary Docket No.3 No. 164 DB 2007 Attorney Registration No. 45866 (Philadelphia) ORDER
More informationBEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL : No. 399, Disciplinary Docket Petitioner : No. 3 Supreme Court : v. : No. 30 DB 1998 Disciplinary Board
More informationROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London. DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE (for all staff other than academic teaching staff)
APPROVED BY COUNCIL September 2002 ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE (for all staff other than academic teaching staff) Disciplinary Policy and Procedure September 2002
More informationThis booklet may not be commercially reproduced, but copying for other purposes, with credit, is encouraged.
November 2015 2015, Legal Services Society, BC 4th edition: November 2015 1st edition: May 2009 ISSN 2369-9523 (Print) ISSN 2369-9531 (Online Acknowledgements Editors: Lesley Cameron, Jay Istvanffy Designer:
More informationINTRODUCTION. History of the Criminal Justice Branch: CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL
CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL INTRODUCTION History of the Criminal Justice Branch: Over three decades ago, the Criminal Justice Branch was created following
More informationWorkers Compensation: A Response To the Recent Attacks on the Commission s Authority to Suspend A Claimant s Benefits
Workers Compensation: A Response To the Recent Attacks on the Commission s Authority to Suspend A Claimant s Benefits by Charles F. Midkiff Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C. 300 Arboretum Place, Suite 420 Richmond,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR COURT OF APPEAL HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR COURT OF APPEAL Citation: R. v. Pottle, 2016 NLCA 22 Date: May 12, 2016 Docket: 201501H0093 BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN APPELLANT AND: STANLEY POTTLE
More informationTEACHERS ACT [SBC 2011] Chapter 19. Contents PART 1 - DEFINITIONS
[SBC 2011] Chapter 19 Contents 1 Definitions PART 1 - DEFINITIONS PART 2 COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF CERTIFICATION 2 Appointment of commissioner 3 Commissioner s power to delegate 4 Recommendations about
More informationDisciplinary Policy & Procedure. Version 2.0
Disciplinary Policy & Procedure Version 2.0 Date of Last Update: February 2015 Version Control Note: minor updates increase version number by 0.1, major updates increase version number by 1.0. Version
More informationA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM
A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM HISTORY Michigan s system for attorney discipline has existed in its current form since 1978. With the creation of the State Bar of Michigan
More informationScope of the criminal representation contract
C r i mi n a l T a r i ff Criminal Tariff General Tariff Information This chapter of LSS Tariffs provides information about how LSS will compensate you for the criminal law services that you provide to
More informationDECISION ON EXPENSES
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario BETWEEN: BRADLEY MICHAEL MULHALL Applicant and WAWANESA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Insurer DECISION ON EXPENSES Before:
More informationThe Registered Psychiatric Nurses Act
1 REGISTERED PSYCHIATRIC NURSES c. R-13.1 The Registered Psychiatric Nurses Act being Chapter R-13.1 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1993 (effective June 23, 1993) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan,
More informationChapter 1.3 - IPC Classification Code: models of best practice, Intentional Misrepresentation Rules
Chapter 1.3 - IPC Classification Code: models of best practice, Intentional Misrepresentation Rules June 2013 International Paralympic Committee Adenauerallee 212-214 Tel. +49 228 2097-200 www.paralympic.org
More informationTAXI and TLC-Licensee CASES
TAXI and TLC-Licensee CASES A Guide to Your Hearing at the OATH Tribunal 40 Rector Street, 6th Floor New York, NY TABLE OF CONTENTS Taxi and TLC-Licensee Cases Heard at OATH.......3 Should I Get a Lawyer?.
More informationThe Licensed Practical Nurses Act, 2000
1 LICENSED PRACTICAL NURSES, 2000 c. L-14.2 The Licensed Practical Nurses Act, 2000 being Chapter L-14.2 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2000 (effective November 24, 2000) as amended by Statutes of Saskatchewan,
More informationHuman Resources People and Organisational Development. Disciplinary Procedure for Senior Staff
Human Resources People and Organisational Development Disciplinary Procedure for Senior Staff AUGUST 2015 1. Introduction 1.1 This procedure applies to Senior Staff. Senior Staff includes: 1.1.1 the Vice-Chancellor
More informationDISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE
DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE Date: 5 May 2015 Approved: 3 June 2015 Review date: 22 April 2018 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. NOTES OF GUIDANCE Counselling General Principles Investigation Minor Matters
More informationHUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY. Date of Policy 1993 Date policy to be reviewed 09/2014
HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY Date of Policy 1993 Date policy to be reviewed 09/2014 Policy written by SFC/HR Risk Register Ref (s) HR7 Impact Assessed EDG Date Impact assessed 10/2012
More informationEmployees have the right to appeal against any disciplinary warnings and dismissal.
ST JUST IN PENWITH TOWN COUNCIL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES Introduction This procedure is designed to help and encourage all employees to achieve and maintain acceptable standards of conduct and job performance.
More information~'"t'" C BRITISH OLUMBIA. IN THE MATTER OF THE MORTGAGE BROKERS ACT R.S.B.C. 1996,c. 313 IN THE MATTER OF LUCIANO MANNU AND REHAB CAPITAL CORP.
~ ~~ ~'"t'" C BRITISH OLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE MORTGAGE BROKERS ACT R.S.B.C. 1996,c. 313 IN THE MATTER OF LUCIANO MANNU AND REHAB CAPITAL CORP. SUSPENSION ORDER (Pursuant to section 8(2) of the Mortgage
More informationThe Respiratory Therapists Act
1 RESPIRATORY THERAPISTS c. R-22.0002 The Respiratory Therapists Act being Chapter R-22.0002 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2006 (effective April 1, 2009) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan,
More informationJOINT AGREEMENT ON GUIDANCE ON DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES IN FURTHER EDUCATION COLLEGES
JOINT AGREEMENT ON GUIDANCE ON DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES IN FURTHER EDUCATION COLLEGES BETWEEN THE ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES (AoC) AND ASSOCIATION FOR COLLEGE MANAGEMENT (ACM) ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS & LECTURERS
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE May 2012 1 Introduction The Disciplinary Procedure applies to all SESTRAN employees. Its main aims are to promote fairness, equity and order in the treatment of individuals and in
More informationDriver Improvement Program Policies and Guidelines
Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles Ministry of Justice Driver Improvement Program Policies and Guidelines Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles Po Box 9254 Stn Prov Govt Victoria,
More informationCHARGED with a CRIME What YOU
YOU VE been CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU NEED to KNOW Visit the Alberta Justice website at: www.justice.alberta.ca This booklet is intended to provide general information only. If you require specific
More informationIntroduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665.
Introduction On January 1, 2000, California's Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Government Code sections 8547 et seq.) was significantly amended. The Legislature amended this law to strengthen protections
More informationCOMMUNITY CARE AND ASSISTED LIVING APPEAL BOARD. Community Care and Assisted Living Act, SBC 2002, c.75
Citation: 2005 BCCCALAB 7 Date: 20050916 COMMUNITY CARE AND ASSISTED LIVING APPEAL BOARD Community Care and Assisted Living Act, SBC 2002, c.75 Appellant: TA Respondent: Karen Ayers, Executive Director,
More informationPUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
This information has been prepared for persons who wish to make or have made a complaint to The Lawyer Disciplinary Board about a lawyer. Please read it carefully. It explains the disciplinary procedures
More informationYOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW. Justice
YOU VE been CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU NEED to KNOW Justice 1 This booklet is intended to provide general information only. If you require specific legal advice, please consult the appropriate legislation
More informationOPINION AND ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT
Summary of Opinion. People v. Berkley, No. 99PDJ073, 12/7/1999. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and Hearing Board reinstated Petitioner, Martin J. Berkley to the practice of law effective
More informationWitness Protection Act 1995 No 87
New South Wales Witness Protection Act 1995 No 87 Status information Currency of version Current version for 5 October 2012 to date (generated 10 October 2012 at 19:15). Legislation on the NSW legislation
More informationBOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS For the purpose of facilitating disciplinary hearings and related proceedings that are conducted pursuant to Rule V of
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1856
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1856 Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against A.B., a Minnesota Attorney, Panel Case No. 35121 Filed: October 8, 2014 Office
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1 POLICY STATEMENT & SCOPE
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1 POLICY STATEMENT & SCOPE 1.1 The College aims wherever possible to resolve informally matters of potentially unsatisfactory conduct, attendance or poor performance, without resorting
More informationWORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1015/94
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1015/94 This appeal was heard by conference call between Toronto and Thunder Bay on December 1, 1994, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: J.P. Moore:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 105,258. In the Matter of BART A. CHAVEZ, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 105,258 In the Matter of BART A. CHAVEZ, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed April 8, 2011. Published
More informationDocument Name Disciplinary Policy Accountable Body RADIUS Trust Reference HR.P2 Date Ratified 13 th August 2015 Version 1.5 Last Update August 2015
Category Human Resources Document Name Disciplinary Policy Accountable Body RADIUS Trust Reference HR.P2 Date Ratified 13 th August 2015 Version 1.5 Last Update August 2015 Related Documents Name Support
More informationORDER PO-3571. Appeal PA15-24. Ministry of Community and Social Services. January 28, 2016
ORDER PO-3571 Appeal PA15-24 Ministry of Community and Social Services January 28, 2016 Summary: The ministry received a correction request from the appellant requesting that the ministry correct a 2010
More informationThe Credit Reporting Act
1 CREDIT REPORTING c. C-43.2 The Credit Reporting Act being Chapter C-43.2 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2004 (effective March 1, 2005). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been
More informationCHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO REGULATION 9-1 PUBLIC ACCOUNTING LICENSING Adopted by the Council pursuant to the Chartered Accountants Act, 2010, and the Bylaws on June 16, 2011, as amended
More informationThe Payday Loans Act
1 PAYDAY LOANS c. P-4.3 The Payday Loans Act being Chapter P-4.3 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007 (effective January 1, 2012). NOTE: This consolidation is not official and is subject to House amendments
More informationBylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association Enacted November 18, 2015 Preamble and Purpose 1.) Background. Under Rule V, Section 5 of the
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 12-B-2701 IN RE: MARK LANE JAMES, II ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
03/01/2013 "See News Release 012 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 12-B-2701 IN RE: MARK LANE JAMES, II ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This disciplinary
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,569. In the Matter of LUCAS L. THOMPSON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 112,569 In the Matter of LUCAS L. THOMPSON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed February 27, 2015.
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM
2006 AN OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM OUTCOMES As a result of this lesson, students will be able to: Summarize juvenile court process and procedures Define legal terms used in the juvenile justice
More informationCitation: W. W. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission, 2015 SSTAD 924 W. W. and. Canada Employment Insurance Commission. and
Citation: W. W. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission, 2015 SSTAD 924 Date: July 27, 2015 File number: AD-14-272 APPEAL DIVISION Between: W. W. Appellant and Canada Employment Insurance Commission
More informationInquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer
Inquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer This pamphlet provides general information relating to the purpose and procedures of the Florida lawyer discipline system. It should be read carefully and completely
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 98-B-2513 IN RE: BARBARA IONE BIVINS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 98-B-2513 IN RE: BARBARA IONE BIVINS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM * This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from three counts of formal charges instituted
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 14-BG-607
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationSUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO
Summary of Opinion. People v. Brock, No. 00PDJ091, 4/19/01. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge reinstated Kenneth F. Brock, attorney registration number 25972 to the practice of law
More informationThe Psychologists Act, 1997
1 The Psychologists Act, 1997 being Chapter P-36.01 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1997 (subsections 54(1), (2), (3), (6), (7) and (8), effective December 1, 1997; sections 1 to 53, subsections 54(4),
More informationThe Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists Act
SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGISTS 1 The Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists Act being Chapter S-56.2 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1990-91 (effective May 31, 1992) as amended by the Statutes of
More information[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Dearfield, 130 Ohio St.3d 363, 2011-Ohio-5295.]
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Dearfield, 130 Ohio St.3d 363, 2011-Ohio-5295.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEARFIELD. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Dearfield, 130 Ohio St.3d 363, 2011-Ohio-5295.]
More informationLAS VEGAS MUNICIPAL CODE. 2.64.010 Created--Purpose. 2.64.020 Definitions. 2.64.030 Director.
LAS VEGAS MUNICIPAL CODE 2.64.010 Created--Purpose. Pursuant to the authority of Chapter 289 of the Nevada Revised Statutes there is created the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Citizen Review
More informationCOLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM SYSTEM PRESIDENT S PROCEDURE STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
Page 1 of 7 COLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM SYSTEM PRESIDENT S PROCEDURE STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE SP 4-30 EFFECTIVE: July 1, 1998 RETITLED: September 14, 2000 RETITLED: August 25, 2001 REVISED:
More informationRule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. 1. Application of rule. (a) This rule applies to: (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state; (2) All actions or proceedings
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 11-B-1631 IN RE: MAZEN YOUNES ABDALLAH ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
10/14/2011 "See News Release 066 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 11-B-1631 IN RE: MAZEN YOUNES ABDALLAH ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM * This disciplinary
More informationNo. 1-10-2072 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). SIXTH DIVISION JUNE 30, 2011 IN
More informationNO. 00-B-3532 IN RE: LEONARD O. PARKER, JR ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
03/15/02 See News Release 020 for any concurrences and/or dissents. SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 00-B-3532 IN RE: LEONARD O. PARKER, JR ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This disciplinary
More informationBEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 08-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT. Parties and Appearance
BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 08-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS 11 Austin Office COMMISSION FOR LAWYER * DISCIPLINE, * Petitioner * * 201400539 v. * * CHARLES J. SEBESTA, JR., * Respondent
More informationAttorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Sandra Lynn Reno, Misc. Docket AG No. 5, September Term, 2013
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Sandra Lynn Reno, Misc. Docket AG No. 5, September Term, 2013 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE MARYLAND LAWYERS RULE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 8.4 Court of Appeals denied
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL. HCVAP 2012/026 IN THE MATTER of an Interlocutory Appeal and
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SAINT LUCIA HCVAP 2012/026 IN THE MATTER of an Interlocutory Appeal and IN THE MATTER of Part 62.10 of the Civil Procedure Rules BETWEEN: CHRISTIAN
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Acknowledgements... Table of Cases...
Preface... Acknowledgements... History... Table of Cases... xiii xv xvii xix PART I COURT STRUCTURE AND PROCEDURAL CHARTS... 3 Court Structure Launching and Prosecuting an Appeal Checklist for Parole Ineligibility
More informationThe Mortgage Brokerages and Mortgage Administrators Act
MORTGAGE BROKERAGES AND 1 The Mortgage Brokerages and Mortgage Administrators Act being Chapter M-20.1* of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007 (effective October 1, 2010), as amended by the Statutes of
More informationRepresenting Yourself. Your Family Law Trial
Representing Yourself at Your Family Law Trial - A Guide - June 2013 REPRESENTING YOURSELF AT YOUR FAMILY LAW TRIAL IN THE ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE This is intended to help you represent yourself in a
More informationBEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL C HEARING FINDINGS AND ORDER
BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL C IN RE: JONATHAN B. HUBER, Respondent Arkansas Bar ID# 2008037 CPC Docket No. 2012-003 HEARING FINDINGS AND ORDER The formal charges of
More informationBEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : :
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of DAVID E. SHAPIRO PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT No. 691, Disciplinary Docket No. 2 Supreme Court No. 74 DB 1989 - Disciplinary
More informationAUTOMART LIMITED V. WAQA ROKOTUINASAU - ERCA NO. 9 OF 2012 JUDGMENT
IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COURT AT SUVA APPELLATE JURISDICTION CASE NUMBER: ERCA NO. 09 OF 2012 BETWEEN: AUTOMART LIMITED APPELLANT AND: WAQA ROKOTUINASAU RESPONDENT Appearances: Ms. Drova for the Appellant.
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE Author: Julie Newnham Revised : August 2013 Review Date: August 2014 Students First DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES 1 Scope and purpose 1.1 This procedure applies to all employees other
More informationSEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015
SEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015 INTRODUCTION JONATHAN MCFARLAND 2 IN RE REINES - CASE OVERVIEW CHRISTIE MATTHAEI 3 APPLICABLE RULES THERESA WANG 4 APPLICABLE FEDERAL
More informationOverview of. Health Professions Act Nurses (Registered) and Nurse Practitioners Regulation CRNBC Bylaws
Overview of Health Professions Act Nurses (Registered) and Nurse Practitioners Regulation CRNBC Bylaws College of Registered Nurses of British Columbia 2855 Arbutus Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6J 3Y8
More informationLittle Stoke Primary School
Little Stoke Primary School A Model Disciplinary Procedure for Staff Employed in Locally Managed Schools This Policy complies with the ACAS Code of Practice and ACAS Guide to Discipline and Grievances
More informationZ:\Committee\2015-16\PERSONNEL PANEL\2015-07-14\POLICIES\Discipline Procdure.doc
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE This procedure is designed to help and encourage all council employees to achieve and maintain high standards of conduct whilst at work or representing the council.
More informationTITLE 160. DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER CREDIT CHAPTER 55. MORTGAGE BROKERS, MORTGAGE LENDERS AND MORTGAGE LOAN ORIGINATORS SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
TITLE 160. DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER CREDIT CHAPTER 55. MORTGAGE BROKERS, MORTGAGE LENDERS AND MORTGAGE LOAN ORIGINATORS SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 160:55-1-1. Purpose The rules in this chapter provide
More informationDELAWARE STATE SENATE 147th GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 FOR SENATE BILL NO. 38
SPONSOR: Sen. Peterson & Rep. Hudson Sen. Sokola DELAWARE STATE SENATE 147th GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 FOR SENATE BILL NO. 38 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 24 CHAPTER 40 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2014 UT 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH In the Matter of the Discipline of JERE B. RENEER, JERE B. RENEER,
More informationFamily Law Client Information Package
Family Law Client Information Package The end of a relationship can be very difficult. In addition to the obvious emotional issues, couples are often faced with challenging financial and legal problems.
More informationINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA) CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ETHICS CASE PROCEDURES
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA) CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ETHICS CASE PROCEDURES INTRODUCTION. The ISA Certification Board develops and promotes high ethical standards for the Certified Arborist
More informationHEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING
HEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING 19-301. License required; exceptions; practice without license (a) In general. -- Except as otherwise provided in this title, an individual
More informationA Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal
A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal Presented by the Office of the Richmond County District Attorney Acting District Attorney Daniel L. Master, Jr. 130 Stuyvesant
More information