Environmental Monitoring Report

Transcription

1 Environmental Monitoring Report Quarterly Report No. 6 April - June 2014 Kingdom of Thailand Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Highway Expansion Project (HEP) [The Four-Lane Highway Widening Project (Phase II)] National Highway Route No. 12 and No. 359 Prepared by Asian Engineering Consultants Corp., Ltd. for the Department of Highways, Ministry of Transport, Kingdom of Thailand, and Asian Development Bank

2 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 30 June 2014) Currency unit - Thai Baht (THB) - US Dollars ($) THB1.00 = $ $1.00 = THB ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank B.E. - Buddhist Era CSC - Construction Supervision Consultant DOH - Department of Highways dba - Decibel A EWEC - East-West Economic Corridor EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment FY - Fiscal Year GMS - Greater Mekong Subregion HEP - Highway Expansion Project IEE - Initial Environmental Examination km. - Kilometer NTP - Notice to Proceed PPE - Personnel Protective Equipment PPV - Peak Particle Velocity ROW - Right of Way SEC - South Economic Corridor SEMP - Site Specific Environmental Management Plan NOTES (i) (ii) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Department of Highways, Ministry of Transport, ends on 30 September. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2013 ends on 30 September In this report, "$" refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated. This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

3 CONTENTS Page LOCATION MAP OF PROJECT ROADS Figure 1 : Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Corridors and Project Roads Figure 2 : Location Map of the Project Road (National Highway Route No. 12) Phitsanulok - Lom Sak Section Figure 3 : Location Map of the Project Road (National Highway Route No. 359) Phanom Sarakham - Sa Kaeo Section I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. The Project 1 B. Project Alignment 1 i. National Highway Route No ii. National Highway Route No C. Project Construction Sections 2 II. ENVIRONMENT MONITORING MECHANISM 3 A. Site specific Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) 3 B. Environment Monitoring Plan 3 C. Environment Quality Monitoring Schedule 4 D. Monitoring of SEMP Implementation 5 E. Inspection Team 5 F. Report Submission 6 III. SEASONAL EFFECT 6 IV. RESULTS OF MONITORING 7 A. Inspection in April - June i. National Highway Route No ii. National Highway Route No V. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MONITORING (April June 2014) 9 A. Highway Route No B. Highway Route No VI. CONCLUSIONS 9 APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B Sample Copies of Monitoring Checklists filled by CSC and the Contractor Photographs related to the improvement of Mitigation Measures

4 LOCATION MAP OF PROJECT ROADS Figure 1: Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Corridors and Project Roads

5 Figure 2: Location Map of the Project Road (National Highway Route No. 12) Phitsanulok - Lom Sak Section

6 Figure 3: Location Map of the Project Road (National Highway Route No. 359) Phanom Sarakham - Sa Kaeo Section

7 I. INTRODUCTION A. The Project 1. The Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Highway Expansion Project [known as the Four-Lane Highway Widening Project (Phase II)] is planned to upgrade 178 kilometers of two-lanes National Highway to four-lanes to meet international highway standard and for accommodating the economic development within the Greater Mekong Subregion. The 178 kilometers are located along two sections of highway: Highway Route No. 12 from Phitsanulok to Lom Sak (105 kilometers) as part of the East-West Economic Corridor (EWEC); and Highway Route No.359 from Phanom Sarakham to Sa Kaeo (73 kilometers) sited on the South Economic Corridor (SEC). 2. Construction is divided into eight portions which called as Packages. The section along Highway Route No.12 consists of five packages (A, B, C, D, and E), while the section along Highway Route No. 359 is composed of three packages (F, G, and H). Construction was started on February 2013 with 720 and 900 days periods. 3. The proposed project is classified as Environmental Category B sensitive according to ADB classification and requires preparation of Initial Environmental Examination (IEE). The proposed project for Highway Route No.12 which passes through watershed class 1B and class 2 also requires preparation of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report according to The Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act, B.E (1992). Recommendation of environmental impact mitigation measures and environmental quality monitoring in the EIA report were developed during the early stage of the project. 4. The Highway Route No. 359 classified as Environmental Category B sensitive according to ADB classification requires preparation of IEE, but the project does not required an EIA report according to The Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act, B.E (1992). Mitigation measures for construction of The Highway Route No. 359 come from the approved IEE. 5. Recommendations for impact minimization of the two Highways in the abovementioned reports are generally targeting construction activities on or around the road and may not be able to effectively mitigate impacts occurring at other affiliating areas. Therefore addition Site-specific Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) is required for those specific areas or activities. B. Project Alignment i. National Highway Route No The Project objective is to upgrade one highway section located on the GMS East-West Economic Corridor, approximately 105 kilometers namely, Highway Route No.12, Phitsanulok-Lom Sak Section. The beginning of the project is located at the Wang Thong Intersection (Km ), Phitsanulok Province. The ending point of the project is located at the Phor Khun Pha Muang Intersection (Km ), located in Lom Sak, Phetchaboon. 7. The Highway Route No.12 Section is adjacent to Thung Salaeng Luang National Park, three reserved forests, and a number of sensitive watersheds. Total length of Route No.12 that runs along the border of Thung Salaeng Luang National Park is kilometers. -1-

8 ii. National Highway Route No The Project objective is to upgrade the highway section located on the GMS South Economic Corridor, approximately 73 kilometers called Highway Route No.359, Phanom Sarakham - Sa Kaeo Section. 9. This roadway section connects between existing roadway junctions with Highway Route No. 304 on the west and Highway Route No. 33 to the east. The beginning of Phanom Sarakham to Sa Kaeo roadway section is approximately 300 meters on the east of Highway Route No.304, and terminates at the end approximately 400 meters west of Highway Route No.33. The existing ROW of the Phanom Sarakham - Sa Kaeo section does not pass any protected area. C. Project Construction Sections 10. The project works on Highway Route No. 12 are divided into 5 packages. Package A covers Km to Km , Package B covers Km to Km , Package C covers Km to Km , Package D covers Km to Km , and Package E covers Km to Km The project works on Highway Route No. 359 are divided into 3 packages. Package F covers Km to Km , Package G covers Km to Km , and Package H is for Km to Km There are eight construction contractors handling construction works for eight packages. Almost all of Notice to Proceeds (NTP) have issued to the Contractors by February Except Package B of Highway Route No. 12, the NTP has awarded to the Contractor on 2 May Table 1: Details of Work Packages of Highway Route No. 12 and No. 359 Highway Route/Package Section Construction Contract Duration NTP Construction Contractors Highway Route No. 12; Phitsanulok - Lom Sak Section (Km to Km ) Package A Km to Km days 31 January 2013 BCK-PNT JV Package B Package C Package D Package E Km to Km Km to Km Km to Km Km to Km days 02 May 2013 KRC-SKY JV 900 days 01 February 2013 Christiani & Nielsen (Thai) Pcl. 900 days 01 February 2013 Thaiwat Engineering Co., Ltd. 720 days 01 February 2013 Ch. Thavee Construction Co., Ltd. -2-

9 Highway Route/Package Section Construction Contract Duration NTP Construction Contractors Highway Route No. 359; Phanom Sarakham - Sa Kaeo Section Package F Package G Package H Km to Km Km to Km Km to Km days 05 February 2013 Donmuang Kanchang Co., Ltd. 720 days 05 February 2013 Saengchaichoke Co., Ltd. 720 days 05 February 2013 S.P.T. Civil Group LTD., PART. II. ENVIRONMENT MONITORING MECHANISM 13. The international and national environmental specialists under CSC are responsible for quarterly environmental monitoring report of the environmental management works. The first quarterly report of January to March 2013 was submitted to DOH and ADB at the end of June The second quarterly report for April to June 2013 was submitted by the following month. The third quarterly report covering July to September 2013 was submitted at the end of October The fourth quarterly report covering October-December 2013 was submitted on the second week of May. This Report is the fifth report covering January-March Activities and implementation of mitigation measures by the Contractors on the project sites have been observed. In order to ensure all applied measures compliance with the Sitespecific Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) of the Project, the specialist has been carried out inspection and given recommendation to the Contractors since the construction started. A. Site-specific Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) 15. SEMP was a requirement of ADB and DOH included the requirement in EMP of the Civil Works bidding documents during the procurement stage. The Contractors were required to prepare the SEMP after awarded to be the Contractor and the conditions in the SEMP become contractually binding in the construction contract. 16. The SEMP requirement included in the bidding documents is general in scope. This is necessary because specific details such as location of Contractors worker camps, site office, workshops, maintenance yards, borrow pit locations, crushing plants, soil cement plants, asphaltic concrete plants, disposal sites and others are unidentifiable at the bidding stage. These details must be identified by the Contractor in the SEMP. The first version of SEMP had submitted by all Contractors. Comments to the submitted SEMP have been made by CSC, DOH and ADB after reviewed. Updated SEMP were then submitted to DOH and ADB by the end of June B. Environmental Monitoring Plan 17. The Environmental Monitoring Plans are included in the SEMP, consists of two main parts. The first part is for environmental quality monitoring as presented in the EIA/IEE. The second part is concerning implementation of mitigation measures by the Contractors. -3-

10 18. Monitoring of environmental quality in aspects of dust, noise, vibration, erosion/sedimentation, drainage/water quality, flora and fauna (rare and endangered species), local access and resettlement are required on consecutive basis throughout entire construction phase. 19. The necessity of monitoring/inspection on implementation of mitigation measures is to ensure actual implementation and effectiveness of applied mitigation measures. The Contractors have responsibility to apply measures complying with the recommendations. Environmental Specialist of the Contractors shall make weekly inspection by using a Checklist table. The original version of the Checklist table was included in the first SEMP (February 2013) and revised SEMP (June 2013) was used by August On August 2013, ADB forwarded the first revision of Checklist table to CSC. Translation to Thai has been made by consultant of the Contractors and reviewed by CSC. Then the table became effective for use on site by September In case non-compliance is found, the specialist shall notify the Contractor to take corrective actions. Then the specialist shall report to Resident Engineer on a weekly basis and to CSC for acknowledgement and consideration. 20. Along with using of the revised checklist tables, some modification has been made by the Contractors. Requesting modification based on some measures which unneeded or can be able to mitigate by simple measures. Contractors have requested modification during the second visitation of the Mission in December 2013 and finally instructed the Contractors that some measures may delete if it is not applicable and provided a reasonable justification for exemption. 21. Site visit of the Mission in December 2013, the Mission found a storage building for explosive materials inside the Contractor s camp site. Discussion was made with the Package A and Package B Contractors and learnt that road widening required blasting work. The blasting work has been applied by Package A, Package B and Package D. Package E has no plan to apply blasting work. During the second quarter of 2014 (April June 2014), blasting work by Package B and Package D have been carried out. The work is still in progress in Package B. CSC is keeping eyes on Package B to apply all mitigation measures for blasting work recommended by ADB. 22. On 22 May 2014 a meeting was organized among Resident Engineers and the Contractors of Highway Route 12 to discuss the tree planting plan. The plan shall be complied with recommendation in EIA. Size of tree depends on the available budget of each Contractor, but size selection shall be same standard. In June 2014, final discussion with all Contractors was made and requested the Contractors to submit proposal of tree planting plan and to start planting during the early rainy season. 23. CSC is responsible for checking the Contractors activities, checking Checklist tables filled by the Contractor s Environmental Specialist, overseeing mitigation measures implemented by the Contractors, giving recommendation to Contractors and reporting to DOH. Appendix A shows an example of CSC filled checklist table. In the event of non-compliance with SEMP found by CSC, CSC shall instruct the contractor to take corrective action to resolve issues back to compliance. Most monitoring is based on visual observations and onsite discussion. C. Environmental Quality Monitoring Schedule 24. The timing of the environmental quality monitoring is mentioned in the SEMP and considered as an important issue. The following table presents monitoring schedule and method as guide for the Contractors. -4-

11 Table 2: Environmental quality monitoring frequency required by SEMP Aspect Method Frequency 1. Dust Visual inspection Weekly 2. Noise/vibration Measurement Monthly 3. Erosion/sedimentation Visual inspection of control facilities 4. Drainage/water quality Observation of construction related hazardous material use/storage facility and operation Monthly and after storm event Weekly 5. Flora/Fauna/rare and endangered species Monitoring for poaching of forest products and wildlife Monthly and together with noise monitoring at wildlife crossing location near Thung Salaeng Laung (Km 80-83) 6. Local access Visual inspection for implementation of mitigation measures 7. Displacement/resettlement Monitoring the implementation of CAP (Corrective Action Plan) Monthly site visit and RCC meeting every three months Monthly site visit and RCC meeting every three months Remark:- Highway Route No. 359 does not pass any conservation areas, hence monitoring of Flora/Fauna/rare and endangered species are not necessary. D. Monitoring of SEMP Implementation 25. SEMP is monitored by both the Contractors and CSC Environmental Specialist. 26. The SEMP monitoring is carried out by Environmental Specialist of the Contractors on weekly basis. The specialist uses Checklist table for Contractor to ensure that all mitigation measures in SEMP has been implemented sufficiently. The filled tables are then submitted to Resident Engineers for consideration. 27. The SEMP implementation is monitored and enforced by CSC environmental specialist. Checklist table included in the SEMP which is used as a tool to enforce consistency among various packages are gathered on monthly basis. The checklist table has to be filled correctly to accompany monitoring reporting. E. Inspection Team 28. Monthly site inspection is performed by an inspection team. Generally, the team at least consists of three parties, DOH, CSC and Construction Contractors. CSC Environmental Specialist visits Resident Engineer at the site office, where a meeting attended by Environmental Specialist from Contractors and Environmental Consultants of the Contractors is held. -5-

12 29. Contractor s Environmental Specialist reports to the meeting about the implementation of mitigation measures took place during last four weeks. Special discussion on measures application is made in case of non-compliance. Site inspection is performed after the meeting. 30. Onsite discussion and recommendation have made by the inspection team. In case of noncompliance mitigation measures application, CSC will make recommendation or suggestion to the Contractors. Timeframe for remedial action implementation will be given to the Contractors. Generally, given timeframe depends on type of non-compliance measures. For example, in case of running trucks causing fugitive dust or mud and clay on public road, CSC requested the Contractor to take remedial actions immediately. But for other non-compliance issues not immediately or directly affecting nearby residents such as providing of oil and grease trappers, cleaning of drainage canals around worker camp, etc., given timeframe can be one week up to ten days. F. Report Submission 31. As stated in the SEMP, two kinds of reports shall be prepared and submitted by the contractors. The first were weekly checklist table which filled by visual inspection of Environmental Specialist of the Contractors. The filled table shall be submitted to Resident Engineers, who subsequently gather the weekly reports for monthly reporting by end of each month. 32. The second report is monthly monitoring reports. According to SEMP, the Contractors shall prepare and submit monthly monitoring report to CSC and DOH. The report includes inspection results and environmental quality monitoring results. If any case of noncompliance occurred in that month, the report must detail corrective actions requirement and recommendation for unresolved non-compliance. 33. As required by ADB, CSC was assigned to prepare quarterly report. The first quarterly report covers January to March 2013 which has been submitted to ADB. Consequently ADB made Comments Matrix QEMR1 to DOH and CSC in the middle of August The Comments have been responded by CSC by mid of September The second quarterly report covers April to June 2013, has been submitted to ADB in July The third report covers July to September 2013, has been submitted in October The fourth report covers October - December 2013, has been submitted in May This report is the fifth quarterly report covers January - March III. SEASONAL AFFECT 34. Thailand climate is controlled by tropical monsoons and the weather is generally marked by three seasons; rainy season, summer season, and cool season. The rainy season lasts from July to October and is dominated by the southwest monsoon, during which rainfall in most of Thailand is at its heaviest. 35. In April to June 2014, dry air with low humidity was blowing toward Thailand and caused longer suspension of ambient particulate. In March to May it is defined as a summer because of dry atmospheric and high temperature. Dust becomes a major pollutant on areas adjacent to the sources. But during April to June 2014, many sections were under construction of road surface and the first asphaltic layer (prime coat) was coated. Dust distribution has been lowered by the coated layer. The month of June is considered as the beginning of rainy season in Thai. There were some rain falls all over the country. Rainfall helped lowering suspension of dust. -6-

13 IV. RESULTS OF MONITORING A. Inspection in April-June 2014 i. National Highway Route No Monthly inspection was started in February 2013 and will be carried out until completion of road construction. Inspection by CSC has been carrying out on monthly basis. On the first quarter of 2014, Environmental Specialist visited Resident Engineers, representatives of the Contractors and environmental consultants of the Contractors on April, May, June Discussion and instructions related to implementation of mitigation measures as in the SEMP has made to the Contractors. Inspection at camp sites and construction zones were carried out after meeting. 38. CSC made comments and specific requirements to all Contractors on Highway Route No. 12. Non-compliance measures implementation have been resolved and remedy actions have been taken. Following table is a summary of the improvement in the latest month of the sixth quarter (June 2014). Table 3: Applied mitigation measures summary on Highway Route No. 12 Workshop Measures Package A B C D E SKY KRC - Drainage canal / X / / / / - Oil and grease trapper / / / / / / - Fuel tanks leak prevention / / / X / / - Lube tanks leak prevention / / / / / / Camp site - Waste bins and waste management / / / / / / - First aid kits / / / / / / - Bath room and toilets / / / / / / - Fire extinguishers / / / / / / Construction sites - Road cleaning team / / / / / / - Flagman for traffic control X / X / / / - Traffic cones for motorist warning / / / / / / - Water spray / / / / / / - PPE for workers / / / / / / - Water way blocking / / / / / / - Blasting work - / / Remark: / means complied application, X means non-complied application - means no activity relating to the work -7-

14 ii. National Highway Route No Inspection by CSC has been carrying out on monthly basis as well as the Highway Route No.12, CSC visited the sites of Highway Route No. 359 on 18 April, 15 May and 20 June Same as the Highway Route No. 12, discussion with Resident Engineers focused on SEMP mitigation measures has undertaken with representative from Contractors. Inspection of camps and construction sites has performed after the discussion. 40. On Highway Route No. 359, recommendations and instructions have made to the Contractors. In June 2014, CSC found most of the findings have been resolved as presents in the following table. Table 4: Applied mitigation measures summary on Highway Route No. 359 Workshop Measures - Drainage canal / Package F G H - Oil and grease trapper / / No workshop - Fuel tanks leak prevention / / - Lube tanks leak prevention / / Camp site - Waste bins and waste management / / / - First aid kits / / / - Bath room and toilets / / / - Fire extinguishers / / / Construction sites - Flagman for traffic control / / / - Traffic cones for motorist warning / / / - Water spray / / / - PPE for workers / / / - Water way blocking / / / - Blasting work Remark: / means complied application, X means non-complied application - means no activity relating to the work / 41. Photographs relating to improvement prior to recommendation are shown in Appendix B. -8-

15 V. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MONITORING (April June 2014) 42. According to SEMP requirement (Table 2), Noise and Vibration Levels shall be observed throughout construction phase. Monthly noise and vibration level measurement at selected sensitive receivers shall be carried out when construction activities approaches the receivers within a 100 meter or when there are complaints from receptors or residents. 43. Measurement of noise and vibration have been carrying out by Trans Asia Consultant Co., Ltd. a consultant of Contractors. Measurement methods and monitoring site selection are based on concerned Notification of Environment Board of Thailand. And the notifications are based on international standards of:- 1) ISO 1996 Acoustics - Description measurement and assessment of environmental noise. - ISO Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures. - ISO Part 2: Determination of environmental noise levels. 2) DIN 4150 Vibration Standard for Structural Protection - DIN Structural vibration - Part 1: Prediction of vibration parameters. - DIN Structural vibration - Part 2: Human exposure to vibration in buildings. - DIN Structural vibration - Part 3: Effects of vibration on structures. 44. The monitoring of environmental quality have been carrying out since construction started (February 2013). According to the specification in the Construction Contract, monitoring of all packages has been completed. Only monitoring of noise for flora and fauna shall be carried out as required. In the second quarterly of 2014 (April June 2014), monitoring of noise and vibration on the recommended sensitive receivers was completed. VI. CONCLUSIONS 45. Application of mitigation measures generally has been complied with SEMP. Dust may be a main problem in this period, but some road surface have been coated with asphaltic (prime coat) which can be able to stop the dust dispersion. The Contractor was instructed to keep spraying water as recommended in the SEMP or as deemed necessary. 46. Blasting work was carried out by Package B and D. The Contractor reported, mitigation measures as specified by the Mission have been applied. During the first quarterly of 2014, there was no compliant and discontent from the building in the project perimeter. 47. Tree planting along the Highway route number 12 as recommended by EIA will start in July

16 Appendix A : Sample Copies of Monitoring Checklists Filled by CSC and the Contractor - by CSC, Package H (April June 2014) - by the Contractor, Package E (April June 2014)

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102 Appendix B : Photographs Related to the Improvement of Mitigation Measures - April - June 2014

103 Package A Before (May 2014) After (June 2014) Photo A-1: On May 2014, workers did not ware safety helmets during working at workshop. On June 2014, workers were wearing proper PPE as recommended. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo A-2: An Oil and grease trapper and drainage canal were cleaned. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo A-3: Lubricant/hydraulic tanks were placed on concrete paved floor, under roof and surrounding with bunds. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo A-4: Properly installed warning sign boards for warning motorists at road diversion. -1-

104 April 2014 May 2014 Photo A-5: Workers applying proper PPE at a bridge construction work. -2-

105 Package B Before (April 2014) After (May 2014) Photo B-1: Concrete paved floor of fuel tank were improved as recommended. Before (April 2014) After (May 2014) Photo B-2: Toilet floor has been cleared. Before (March 2014) After (April 2014) Photo B-3: Concrete paved floor of toilets were improved and cleaned as recommended. Before (March 2014) After (April 2014) Photo B-4: Drainage canal in the campsite were improved. But it may not serve heavy rain. Enlarging the size was recommended. -3-

106 Before (March 2014) After (April 2014) Photo B-5: Lubricant tanks placing outside workshop have been removed inside. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo B-6: At workshop, it was found worker wearing suited PPE. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo B-7: It was found proper road diversion sign boards. -4-

107 Package C Before (March 2014) After (April 2014) Photo C- 1: Lubricant leakage from broken bund was found. Bunds of the workshop were improved as recommended. Before (March 2014) After (April 2014) Photo C-2: Drainage canal behind the site has been cleaned and cleared Before (March 2014) After (April 2014) Photo C- 3: Wastewater overflowed at back side of camp site has been improved Before (April 2014) After (May 2014) Photo C-4: Lubricant/hydraulic tanks were placed inside an area surrounding with bunds. -5-

108 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo C-5: It was found proper road diversion sign boards. May 2014 June 2014 Photo C-6: Workers applying proper PPE at a bridge construction work. -6-

109 Package D Before (March 2014) After (April 2014) Photo D-1: Solid waste disposal site at the workshop has been cleared and removed. Before (April 2014) After (May 2014) Photo D-2: Drainage canal and bunds around the workshop were improved. Before (April 2014) After (May 2014) Photo D-3: Dust collection facility was enclosed with plastic sheets for wind protection. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo D-4: Properly installed warning sign boards for warning motorists at road diversion -7-

110 Package E April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo E-1: A drip pan in workshop was prepared for receiving leakage oil. May 2014 June 2014 Photo E-2: There were trashes with lids placing around camp site. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo E-3: Construction work on curb with a flagman at the site. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo E-4: Proper road diversion sign boards for warning motorist. -8-

111 Package F Before (March 2014) After (April 2014) Photo F-1: There was wastewater in drainage canal behind a food shop. In April 2014, drainage canal has been cleaned and cleared. Before (May 2014) After (June 2014) Photo F-2: Trashes has been cleaned. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo F-3: Water spraying over under construction road for dust suppression. Photo F-4: Drainage canal has been cleaned. Photo F-5: At construction road, it was found worker wearing suited PPE. -9-

112 Package G Before (April 2014) After (May 2014) Photo G-1: Cleaning drainage canal was recommended. May 2014 June 2014 Photo G-2: Trashes with lids placing around camp site. Photo G-3: Water tank spraying water on under construction road. -10-

113 Package H April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo H-1: On April and May 2014, Waste and water stagnant were found in drainage canals at back yard of sub-contractor worker camp. On June 2014,Cleaning drainage canal was recommended. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo H-2: A first aid kid was found in camp site. April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 Photo H-3: It was found prime coat. Photo H-4: Worker cleaning workshop. Photo H-5: Warning sign boards at construction site. -11-