POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE
|
|
|
- Jennifer Burke
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE CLARIFICATION TELECONFERENCES BETWEEN SPONSORS, APPLICANTS, OR MASTER FILE HOLDERS AND THE ONDQA REVIEW TEAM Table of Contents PURPOSE...1 BACKGROUND...2 POLICY...3 PROCEDURES...3 RESPONSIBILITES...5 REFERENCES...7 EFFECTIVE DATE...8 ATTACHMENT: FLOW CHART...9 PURPOSE This MAPP establishes policies and procedures for the Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA) within the Office of Pharmaceutical Science (OPS) to schedule, hold, and document clarification teleconferences between sponsors, applicants, or master file holders, and the ONDQA review team. This MAPP also provides a description of such teleconferences, as well as the circumstances where they can be appropriate and beneficial to the review process. The policies and procedures described in this MAPP are intended to facilitate timely and effective verbal communication between sponsors, applicants, and master file holders, and the ONDQA review team, and to increase the overall efficiency of the chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) and/or biopharmaceutics review process. These policies and procedures are also intended to provide a balance between ONDQA s resources, review workload and timelines, and the need for and benefit of such teleconferences. The policies and procedures in this MAPP apply to: Clarification teleconferences between sponsors, applicants, and master file holders, and the ONDQA review team, regarding CMC and/or biophamaceuticsspecific information, review issues, or concerns. Effective Date: 08/01/14 Page 1 of 9
2 Pre-investigational new drug applications (Pre-INDs), investigational new drug applications (INDs), new drug applications (NDAs), supplemental NDAs, and master files. The policies and procedures in this MAPP do not apply to: Formal meetings between FDA and sponsors or applicants (see Background section and References). Communications between sponsors, applicants, or master file holders, and an ONDQA Project Manager (PM) alone. Communications between ONDQA staff and others on topics unrelated to a specific application or master file. Clinical hold teleconferences. Public presentations or workshops. BACKGROUND CDER grants and holds formal meetings with sponsors and applicants regarding the development and review of products in accordance with applicable laws and regulations (see Prescription Drug User Fee Act [PDUFA] V; 21 CFR 10.65, and (d)). Formal meetings are described in PDUFA V, and the guidance for industry on Formal Meetings (Type A, Type B or Type C) with Sponsors and Applicants, as well as other FDA guidances such as Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Biosimilar Biological Product Sponsors or Applicants (see References). These meetings include pre-ind, end-of-phase 2, stalled clinical trial, pre-nda, late-cycle, and end of review conferences. Such meetings are conducted, tracked, and documented in a formal manner. The format can be face-to-face, teleconference, or videoconference. Minutes of these meetings are prepared and archived in the administrative file, and copies are sent to the sponsor or applicant (see References). ONDQA participates in such formal meetings as a member of a multidisciplinary team. ONDQA also holds formal CMC- and/or biopharmaceutics-only meetings with sponsors and applicants, as appropriate. An optional post-action feedback meeting, which focuses on lessons learned, is also available to applicants. Such a meeting is not considered a PDUFA meeting, and minutes are not required (see References). CDER also holds teleconferences with sponsors, applicants, or master file holders for other purposes which, because of their subject matter, are not considered PDUFA meetings, and for which minutes are not required. However, all substantive teleconferences should be documented and archived (see References). Effective Date: 08/01/14 Page 2 of 9
3 POLICY A clarification teleconference can be held between sponsors, applicants, or master file holders and the ONDQA review team for clarification, explanatory, and/or information-sharing purposes. Examples include teleconferences to: o clarify an item(s) in an FDA letter o discuss an alternative approach to address an item(s) in an FDA letter o discuss a new technology or modeling approach. However, a clarification teleconference is not appropriate if: o the proposed subject matter qualifies as one of the designated types of formal meetings (see Background section and References) o the subject matter involves, or is anticipated to involve, significant decisions, agreements, requests, or recommendations affecting a Pre-IND, IND, NDA, supplemental NDA, or master file o the subject matter proposed for discussion can be appropriately addressed instead by the ONDQA Project Manager (PM) alone. Although clarification teleconferences are conducted in a less formal manner than formal meetings, such teleconferences are official business. Such teleconferences should be documented and archived, as appropriate. PROCEDURES Requests for clarification teleconferences may be made verbally or by by sponsors, applicants, or master file holders, or by ONDQA staff. ONDQA will grant and hold clarification teleconferences requested by sponsors, applicants, or master file holders regarding CMC and/or biopharmaceutics information if the proposed purpose, subject matter, and format of such teleconference is appropriate. Also, ONDQA may request and hold clarification teleconferences with sponsors, applicants, or master file holders regarding CMC and/or biopharmaceutics information if the proposed purpose, subject matter, and format of such teleconference is appropriate. Effective Date: 08/01/14 Page 3 of 9
4 A clarification teleconference will be considered appropriate under the following circumstances: o The teleconference does not qualify as one of the designated types of formal meetings (see Background section and References). o The teleconference is for clarification, explanatory, or information sharing purposes only (see examples above). o The teleconference is considered to be of practical benefit to the review process, for example: - there is a recognized potential for a misunderstanding on a particular issue - a previous attempt to resolve a matter by written communication has been unsuccessful - verbal discussion would substantially increase understanding and/or facilitate resolution of a matter as compared to written communication alone. o The teleconference involves CMC- and/or biopharmaceutics-related information, issues, and/or concerns only, and not those of other disciplines. o The teleconference typically does not require extensive planning. o The teleconference is brief (generally 30 minutes or less). During such a teleconference, ONDQA staff members may openly discuss the scientific and/or regulatory matters at hand. However, if a subject of the type that would be more appropriately addressed in a formal meeting is presented in a clarification teleconference, ONDQA staff will refrain from addressing such matter (see References for guidance on criteria for formal meetings). If the teleconference only involves clarification, explanation, or information sharing, then it is documented as a note in an ongoing review. If there is no review, the teleconference is documented in a brief Memorandum of Teleconference, and archived. If, contrary to the original intentions of the participants, the teleconference results in any significant agreements, decisions, requests, or recommendations that affect a Pre-IND, IND, NDA, supplemental NDA, or master file, the teleconference will be documented in a Memorandum of Teleconference, and archived. Effective Date: 08/01/14 Page 4 of 9
5 RESPONSIBILITES The following responsibilities apply to requesting, conducting, and documenting clarification teleconferences: The ONDQA PM assigned to a particular application will coordinate all clarification teleconferences between sponsors, applicants, or master file holders and ONDQA staff. The Branch Chief (BC), or Biopharmaceutics Team Leader (BTL) for matters pertaining to biopharmaceutics, will determine whether the subject matter of a proposed teleconference is appropriate for a clarification teleconference. If so, the BC (or BTL) will determine or approve the agenda and designate the required attendees besides the assigned ONDQA PM (e.g., BC, BTL, CMC Lead, Biopharmaceutics Lead, Reviewer) and optional attendees, if any (e.g., ONDQA Division Director, Biopharmaceutics Lead). Although concurrence of this by from the BC (or BTL) to the ONDQA PM is preferred, verbal concurrence is acceptable. ONDQA Reviewers, CMC Leads, and/or Biopharmaceutics Reviewers, if not designated by the BC (or BTL), will obtain clearance from their BC (or BTL) before attending the teleconference. The ONDQA PM will be present and take notes during all clarification teleconferences between sponsors, applicants, or master file holders and ONDQA staff. Preferably, the attendees will summarize the items discussed during the teleconference before conclusion of the teleconference. If the teleconference is relevant to an ongoing review and involves clarification, explanation, or information sharing only, then the reviewer will document the teleconference as a note in his or her review. Alternatively, if there is no ongoing review, the ONDQA PM will document it as a brief Memorandum of Teleconference and enter it as a Correspondence Sent via Verbal in the Document Archiving, Reporting, and Regulatory Tracking System (DARRTS). The correspondence will be associated with the relevant application or master file submission. The BC (or BTL) will determine whether the teleconference involved any significant decisions, agreements, requests, or recommendations which affect a Pre-IND, IND, NDA, supplemental NDA, or master file. If so, the ONDQA PM Effective Date: 08/01/14 Page 5 of 9
6 will prepare a Memorandum of Teleconference containing a summary of the teleconference and enter it as a Correspondence Sent via Verbal in DARRTS. The memorandum will be signed by the ONDQA PM and additional attendees, as deemed appropriate (e.g., BC, BTL). The correspondence will be associated in DARRTS with the relevant application or master file submission. The BC, BTL, CMC Lead, and/or Reviewer(s) who attended the teleconference will provide input on scientific or technical issues to the ONDQA PM to aid preparation of a Memorandum of Teleconference, when requested. ONDQA supervisory staff can name a designee for any of the responsibilities described herein, as appropriate. The following additional responsibilities are specific to whether the teleconference is externally or internally initiated: For Externally-Initiated Clarification Teleconferences: The assigned ONDQA PM will discuss all requests received from sponsors, applicants, and master file holders with the BC (or BTL) for all clarification teleconferences with the review team. If any ONDQA staff member receives a request in error for a teleconference, he or she will direct it to the assigned ONDQA PM. The assigned ONDQA PM will inform the requestor whether a clarification teleconference is granted or denied. o If a clarification teleconference is granted, the teleconference will be scheduled to occur on the date and at the time requested or at least in as timely a manner as is practical and as resources allow. The ONDQA PM will obtain a list of the external attendees and inform the requestor of the FDA attendees. o If a clarification teleconference is denied, the BC (or BTL), and/or ONDQA PM will consider alternative means of communication (e.g., formal meeting, written communication, ONDQA PM-only communication), as appropriate. The ONDQA PM will then inform the requestor. During a clarification teleconference, if a sponsor or applicant presents a subject for discussion that would qualify as a subject for a formal meeting (see Background section and References), the ONDQA PM will recommend that the sponsor or applicant submit a written request for a formal meeting. Any ONDQA staff member attending the teleconference may advise the PM that the subject qualifies as one for a formal meeting. Effective Date: 08/01/14 Page 6 of 9
7 For ONDQA-Initiated Clarification Teleconferences: An ONDQA Reviewer, CMC Lead, and/or Biopharmaceutics Lead who wants to initiate a clarification teleconference will first discuss the issue with his or her BC (or BTL) and obtain concurrence. An ONDQA PM who wants to initiate a clarification teleconference involving the ONDQA review team will first discuss the issue or concern with the assigned BC (or BTL) and obtain concurrence. Although concurrence by from the BC (or BTL) to the assigned ONDQA PM is preferred, verbal concurrence is acceptable. Any request to a sponsor, applicant, or master file holder for an ONDQA-initiated clarification teleconference will be made by the assigned ONDQA PM. The ONDQA PM will also inform the sponsor, applicant, or master file holder of the proposed subject, agenda, and format of the teleconference, as well as the FDA attendees. In keeping with the conduct of a clarification teleconference being less formal than a formal meeting, the request will be made by telephone or secure , rather than by a written letter. A request for a clarification teleconference will be made as far in advance as reasonable and practicable to allow the sponsor, applicant, or master file holder to adequately prepare for the teleconference. ONDQA staff will recognize that a sponsor, applicant, or master file holder may grant or refuse a requested teleconference at their discretion. The BC (or BTL) will lead the discussion during the teleconference. These procedures and responsibilities are summarized in the flow chart (see Attachment). REFERENCES 21 CFR Documentation of significant decisions in the administrative file. FDA Guidance for Industry: Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants, May n/guidances/ucm pdf CDER 21 st Century Review Process Desk Reference Guide, New Drug Application and Biologics License Application Reviews (NDA/BLA Review Process), September esprocedures/ucm pdf Effective Date: 08/01/14 Page 7 of 9
8 PDUFA Reauthorization Performance Goals And Procedures Fiscal Years 2013 Through pdf FDA Draft Guidance for Industry: Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Biosimilar Biological Product Sponsors or Applicants, March n/guidances/ucm pdf 1 EFFECTIVE DATE This MAPP is effective upon date of publication. 1 When finalized, the draft guidance will represent FDA s current thinking on the topic. Effective Date: 08/01/14 Page 8 of 9
9 ATTACHMENT: FLOW CHART Effective Date: 08/01/14 Page 9 of 9
Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants of PDUFA Products Guidance for Industry
Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants of PDUFA Products Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions
Guidance for Industry Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants
Guidance for Industry Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
Formal FDA Meeting Request: Guidance and Template
Formal FDA Meeting Request: Guidance and Template ICTR Navigators July 23, 2011 Version 2.0 Page 1 of 20 1.0 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Table of Contents 2 2.0 Abbreviations 2 3.0 FDA Regulations
POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF NEW DRUGS. NDAs and BLAs: Communication to Applicants of Planned Review Timelines.
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH MAPP 6010.8 Rev. 1 POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF NEW DRUGS NDAs and BLAs: Communication to Applicants of Planned Review Timelines Table of Contents PURPOSE...1
PDUFA REAUTHORIZATION PERFORMANCE GOALS AND PROCEDURES FISCAL YEARS 2013 THROUGH 2017
PDUFA REAUTHORIZATION PERFORMANCE GOALS AND PROCEDURES FISCAL YEARS 2013 THROUGH 2017 I. REVIEW PERFORMANCE GOALS A. NDA/BLA Submissions and Resubmissions B. Original Efficacy Supplements C. Resubmitted
Strategies to Prepare for Meetings with the FDA. Kim Colangelo Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office of New Drugs, CDER, FDA
Strategies to Prepare for Meetings with the FDA Kim Colangelo Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office of New Drugs, CDER, FDA Topics for Discussion Who Are We? How Do We Interact Internally? Why
IND Process and Review Procedures (Including Clinical Holds) CONTENTS
MANUAL OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH MAPP 6030.1 REVIEW MANAGEMENT IND Process and Review Procedures (Including Clinical Holds) CONTENTS PURPOSE REFERENCES DEFINITIONS
Medical Billing and Agency Formal Disputes
Guidance for Industry Formal Dispute Resolution: Appeals Above the Division Level Additional copies of this Guidance are available from: Office of Training and Communications Division of Communications
Guidance for Review Staff and Industry Good Review Management Principles and Practices for PDUFA Products
Guidance for Review Staff and Industry Good Review Management Principles and Practices for PDUFA Products U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation
Meetings with CDER Judit Milstein
Meetings with CDER Judit Milstein Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products (DTOP) Office of Antimicrobial Products (OAP), Office of New Drugs (OND) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
Best Practices for Communication Between IND Sponsors and FDA During Drug Development Guidance for Industry and Review Staff
Best Practices for Communication Between IND Sponsors and FDA During Drug Development Guidance for Industry and Review Staff Good Review Practice DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed
CDER 21 st Century Review Process. Desk Reference Guide. New Drug Application and Biologics License Application Reviews (NDA/BLA Review Process)
CDER 21 st Century Review Process Desk Reference Guide New Drug Application and Biologics License Application Reviews (NDA/BLA Review Process) Recent Major Changes Changes to accommodate expedited review
POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF THE CENTER DIRECTOR. Table of Contents
POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF THE CENTER DIRECTOR Tracking of Significant Safety issues in Marketed Drugs -- Use of the DARRTS Tracked Safety Issues Table of Contents PURPOSE...1 BACKGROUND...1 POLICY...2
February 2006 Procedural
Guidance for Industry Reports on the Status of Postmarketing Study Commitments Implementation of Section 130 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 U.S. Department of Health and
FDA Fast Track and Priority Review Programs
Order Code RS22814 February 21, 2008 FDA Fast Track and Priority Review Programs Summary Susan Thaul Specialist in Drug Safety and Effectiveness Domestic Social Policy Division By statutory requirements
Quality Considerations for Breakthrough Therapies-FDA Perspective
Quality Considerations for Breakthrough Therapies-FDA Perspective DIA June 17, 2014 Ramesh K. Sood, Ph.D. Acting Division Director and Angelica Dorantes, Ph.D. xxx ONDQA/OPS/CDER/FDA 1 Background Outline
Providing Regulatory Submissions In Electronic Format Standardized Study Data
Providing Regulatory Submissions In Electronic Format Standardized Study Data Guidance for Industry U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Fees-Exceed-the-Costs Waivers Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Financial Management June 1999 User Fees Guidance for
Guidance for Industry Classifying Resubmissions in Response to Action Letters
Guidance for Industry Classifying Resubmissions in Response to Action Letters U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center
Data Standards in Clinical Trials, A Regulatory Perspec9ve
Data Standards in Clinical Trials, A Regulatory Perspec9ve NIH Data Standards Forum: Maximizing Innova8on by Standardizing Mary Ann Slack Center for Drug Evalua9on and Research (CDER) U.S. Food and Drug
Guidance for Industry
Reprinted from FDA s website by EAS Consulting Group, LLC Guidance for Industry Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format Standardized Study Data DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being
An FDA Perspective on Post- Approval Change Management for PAT and RTRT
An FDA Perspective on Post- Approval Change Management for PAT and RTRT IFPAC 2015 January 26, 2015 Christine M. V. Moore, Ph.D. Acting Director, Process and Facilities FDA/CDER/OPQ Post-Approval Changes
Using Electronic Signatures for Investigational and Marketing Regulatory Document Concurrence/Signoff
Using Electronic Signatures for Investigational and Marketing Regulatory Document Concurrence/Signoff Version #5 Effective Date: April 23, 2012 1. Purpose The purpose of this document is to describe the
POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF NEW DRUGS. Good Review Practice: Management of Breakthrough Therapy-Designated Drugs and Biologics.
POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF NEW DRUGS Good Review Practice: Management of Breakthrough Therapy-Designated Drugs and Biologics Table of Contents PURPOSE...1 BACKGROUND...2 POLICY...3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES...4
Quality Management Plan for the Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls Review Process
Quality Management Plan for the Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls Review Process Final, September 13, 2007 Neptune and Company, Inc. Submitted by: Dean Neptune, Kevin Hull, Daniel Michael, Kelly Bennett,
Overview of FDA Expedited Programs with a Focus on Breakthrough Therapy
Overview of FDA Expedited Programs with a Focus on Breakthrough Therapy Miranda Raggio, RN, BSN, MA CDER Breakthrough Therapy Program Manager Regulatory Affairs Team Office of New Drugs, CDER Overview
Guidance for Industry ANDA Submissions Amendments and Easily Correctable Deficiencies Under GDUFA
Guidance for Industry ANDA Submissions Amendments and Easily Correctable Deficiencies Under GDUFA DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions
Guidance for Industry Independent Consultants for Biotechnology Clinical Trial Protocols
Guidance for Industry Independent Consultants for Biotechnology Clinical Trial Protocols For questions on the content of this document contact Leonard Wilson, CBER at 301-827-0373 or Susan Johnson, CDER
Thomas Hinchliffe, Pharm.D. CDR, U.S. Public Health Service Special Assistant to the Director Office of Generic Drugs Food and Drug Administration
Thomas Hinchliffe, Pharm.D. CDR, U.S. Public Health Service Special Assistant to the Director Office of Generic Drugs Food and Drug Administration Disclaimer & Disclosure Views presented are those of the
Voluntary Genomic Data Submissions at the U.S. FDA
Voluntary Genomic Data Submissions at the U.S. FDA International Conference on Harmonization Chicago, IL November 9-10, 9 2005 Felix W. Frueh, PhD Associate Director for Genomics Office of Clinical Pharmacology
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Formal Dispute Resolution: Scientific and Technical Issues Related to Pharmaceutical CGMP U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry End-of-Phase 2A Meetings U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) September 2009 Procedural Guidance
ectd Digital Handbook Table of Contents
ectd Digital Handbook Table of Contents Introduction by Emily Ethridge, Editor, FDAnews Part 1 Tutorial Section 1.0 ectd Tutorial Table of Contents. This FDA tutorial, consisting of seven PowerPoint presentations,
GDUFA (Generic Drug User Fee Act): Q&A Session 2 by teleconference
GDUFA (Generic Drug User Fee Act): Q&A Session 2 by teleconference 11 th December at 2pm GMT, 3pm CET and 9am EST (USA) What is new? GDUFA is in force since October 1, 2012 One-time backlog fee required
Biosimilars: Additional Questions and Answers Regarding Implementation of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009
Biosimilars: Additional Questions and Answers Regarding Implementation of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being
Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff
Requests for Feedback on Medical Device Submissions: The Pre-Submission Program and Meetings with Food and Drug Administration Staff Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff Document
FY 2013 PERFORMANCE REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS. for the. Biosimilar User Fee Act
FY 2013 PERFORMANCE REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS for the Biosimilar User Fee Act Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services FY 2013 BsUFA Performance Report Commissioner
Summary Level Information and Data for CDER s Inspection Planning. Paul Okwesili Office of Scientific Investigations Office of Compliance, CDER/FDA
Summary Level Information and Data for CDER s Inspection Planning Paul Okwesili Office of Scientific Investigations Office of Compliance, CDER/FDA Agenda Summary of OSI Requests CDER Clinical Investigator
-Drug Master File- Project Management Perspective. CDR Kun Shen, Pharm.D., M.S., BCPS
-Drug Master File- Project Management Perspective CDR Kun Shen, Pharm.D., M.S., BCPS Disclaimer & Disclosure Views presented are those of the speaker and do not reflect official FDA, DHHS or other government
Post-Approval Change Management: Challenges and Opportunities An FDA Perspective
CMC Workshop From Drug Development to Global Supply to Patients April 15-17, 2013, Washington, DC Post-Approval Change Management: Challenges and Opportunities An FDA Perspective Christine M. V. Moore,
Changes to an Approved Product
Changes to an Approved Product Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls By Khandan Baradaran, PhD and Peggy Berry, MBA, RAC It is a huge achievement for any company to obtain licensing rights to an approved
Guidance for Industry and Investigators Safety Reporting Requirements for INDs and BA/BE Studies- Small Entity Compliance Guide
Guidance for Industry and Investigators Safety Reporting Requirements for INDs and BA/BE Studies- Small Entity Compliance Guide U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and
SUBJECT: Combination Product Review, Intercenter Consult Process Study
DATE: October 14, 2015 TO: Associate Commissioner for Planning FROM: Deputy Commissioner for Medical Products and Tobacco SUBJECT: Combination Product Review, Intercenter Consult Process Study Thank you
Food and Drug Administration
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Small Business Assistance Program The Information Source for Regulated Domestic and International Small Pharmaceutical Business CAPT Brenda Stodart, USPHS
Achieving Regulatory Success: Areas of focus for biotechnology companies. Michael J. Schlosser, PhD, DABT April 21, 2013
Achieving Regulatory Success: Areas of focus for biotechnology companies Michael J. Schlosser, PhD, DABT April 21, 2013 Regulatory Success Outline Regulatory Initiatives Regulatory Science Pre-Regulatory
POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PROGRAMS. CDER Informatics Governance Process. Table of Contents
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH MAPP 7600.8 Rev. 1 POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PROGRAMS CDER Informatics Governance Process Table of Contents PURPOSE...1 BACKGROUND...1 POLICY...2
Guidance Medication Guides Distribution Requirements and Inclusion in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS)
Guidance s Distribution Requirements and Inclusion in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format Content of Labeling U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and
GAO NEW DRUG DEVELOPMENT. Science, Business, Regulatory, and Intellectual Property Issues Cited as Hampering Drug Development Efforts
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters November 2006 NEW DRUG DEVELOPMENT Science, Business, Regulatory, and Intellectual Property Issues Cited as Hampering
Software Review Job Aid - Supplement #1
Software Review Job Aid - Supplement #1 1010011101010011110001101001101101101101000100100010101011100010110 1010011101010011110001101001101101101101000100101110101011100010111 0110100110110110110100010010001010101110001011000100111010100111100
Guidance for Industry FDA Approval of New Cancer Treatment Uses for Marketed Drug and Biological Products
Guidance for Industry FDA Approval of New Cancer Treatment Uses for Marketed Drug and Biological Products U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff FDA Acceptance of Foreign Clinical Studies Not Conducted Under an IND Frequently Asked Questions
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff FDA Acceptance of Foreign Clinical Studies Not Conducted Under an IND Frequently Asked Questions U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration
PROCEDURES OFFICE OF NEW DRUGS. External Recruitment (Civil Service) Table of Contents
PROCEDURES OFFICE OF NEW DRUGS External Recruitment (Civil Service) Table of Contents PURPOSE...1 BACKGROUND...1 RESPONSIBILITIES...2 PROCEDURES...3 REFERENCES...5 DEFINITIONS...6 EFFECTIVE DATE...7 ATTACHMENT
Data Standards Strategy. Version: 1.0
Data Standards Strategy Version: 1.0 Document Date: December 5, 2012 Version Number REVISION HISTORY Implemented By Revision Date Description of Change 1.0 CDER DSPB December 5, 2012 Initial Document The
TABLE OF CONTENTS: CDER RECORDS MANAGEMENT TASK ORDER
Work (SOW) - 1 - PART I: CDER TASK ORDER TABLE OF CONTENTS: CDER RECORDS MANAGEMENT TASK ORDER I.1 TASK ORDER INTRODUCTION:... - 3 - I.1.1 BACKGROUND... - 3 - I.1.2 CDER RECORDS MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENT...
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Medication Guides Adding a Toll-Free Number for Reporting Adverse Events U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies: Modifications and Revisions Guidance for Industry
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies: Modifications and Revisions Guidance for Industry The portion of this guidance document setting forth the submission procedures for risk evaluation and mitigation
Update From the Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology
Update From the Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology Gerald J. Dal Pan, MD, MHS Director Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Presentation to FDA-CMS Summit
Guidance for Industry and Review Staff Target Product Profile A Strategic Development Process Tool
Guidance for Industry and Review Staff Product Profile A Strategic Development Process Tool DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions
POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS. Table of Contents
POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS Criteria for Developing and Publishing Digital Content on the CDER External Web Site Table of Contents PURPOSE...1 BACKGROUND...1 POLICY...1 RESPONSIBILITIES...3
DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.
Guidance for Industry Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments, and Proposed REMS Modifications DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed
Roles & Responsibilities of the Sponsor
Roles & Responsibilities of the Sponsor Developed by Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH Endorsed by the CTN SIG Leadership Group Objectives Funding for clinical research comes from
The 505(b)(2) Drug Development Pathway:
The 505(b)(2) Drug Development Pathway: When and How to Take Advantage of a Unique American Regulatory Pathway By Mukesh Kumar, PhD, RAC and Hemant Jethwani, MS The 505(b)(2) regulation offers a less expensive
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA s website for reference purposes only. It was current when produced, but is no longer maintained
Breakthrough Therapy Program U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Breakthrough Therapy Program U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Presentation before the European Commission Expert Group on Safe and Timely Access to Medicines for Patients (STAMP) Jarilyn Dupont,
CATEGORY Advertising. CATEGORY Biopharmaceutics. CATEGORY Biosimilarity
CATEGORY Advertising Guidance Agenda: New & Guidances CDER is Planning to Publish During Calendar Year 2016 (See the Good Guidance Practices (GGPs) regulation on this Web page or 21 CFR 10.115 for details
The Product Review Life Cycle A Brief Overview
Stat & Quant Mthds Pharm Reg (Spring 2, 2014) Lecture 2,Week 1 1 The review process developed over a 40 year period and has been influenced by 5 Prescription User Fee Act renewals Time frames for review
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Major, Minor, and Telephone Amendments to Abbreviated New Drug Applications Comments and suggestions regarding this document should be submitted within 90 days of publication in the
FDA s Final Compliance Policy Guide for Marketed Unapproved Drugs Is Agency Enforcement at a Crossroads, or Stuck in a Traffic Circle
FDA s Final Compliance Policy Guide for Marketed Unapproved Drugs Is Agency Enforcement at a Crossroads, or Stuck in a Traffic Circle Kurt R. Karst Associate Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. 700 Thirteenth
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=682b18787a8886f6ce36a118...
Page 1 of 6 Clinical Studies Monitoring Service (CSMS) National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Solicitation Number: HHSNI-NCISBSSTSB5701304 Agency: Department of Health and Human
Extemporaneously Prepared Early Phase Clinical Trial Materials
Extemporaneously Prepared Early Phase Clinical Trial Materials Richard Hoffman, MS, RAC Eli Lilly & Co. Regulatory Advisor International Consortium for Innovation & Quality in Pharmaceutical Development
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Charging for Investigational Drugs Under an IND Qs & As DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions regarding this
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA s website for reference purposes only. It was current when produced, but is no longer maintained
Challenges in the Regulation of Pediatric Clinical Trials
Challenges in the Regulation of Pediatric Clinical Trials Wilson W. Bryan, M.D. FDA / CBER / OCTGT [email protected] National Institutes of Health Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) Meeting
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Submitting Debarment Certification Statements DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions regarding this draft document
Guidance for Industry Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations
Guidance for Industry Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Office of the Commissioner (OC) May 2007 Guidance
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Codevelopment of Two or More New Investigational Drugs for Use in Combination U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation
Therapeutic Area Standards (TAS) Initiative Project Plan
Therapeutic Area Standards (TAS) Initiative Project Plan Version: 2.0 Document Date: June, 2014 REVISION HISTORY Version Number Revision Date Description of Change 1.0 September, 2013 Initial Document
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH. 203551Orig1s000
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH Approval Package for: APPLICATION NUMBER: Trade Name: Generic Name: Sponsor: 203551Orig1s000 Docetaxel Injection Concentrate, 20 mg/ml, 80 mg/4 ml, 140 mg/7 ml.
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Investigational New Drug Applications for Minimally Manipulated, Unrelated Allogeneic Placental/Umbilical Cord Blood Intended for Hematopoietic and Immunologic Reconstitution
Overview of Drug Development: the Regulatory Process
Overview of Drug Development: the Regulatory Process Roger D. Nolan, PhD Director, Project Operations Calvert Research Institute November, 2006 Adapted from course taught by Cato Research Background: Roger
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Content and Format of Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs) for Phase 1 Studies of Drugs, Including Well-Characterized, Therapeutic, Biotechnology-derived Products Center for
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Toll-Free Number Labeling and Related Requirements for Over-the-Counter and Prescription Drugs Marketed With Approved Applications Small Entity Compliance Guide U.S. Department of
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Cancer Drug and Biological Products Clinical Data in Marketing Applications U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and
Tel: Fax: [Project Name] [Sub-Project, phase, etc.]
[Company Name] [Company Address] Tel: Fax: [Company Phone] [Company Fax] [Company E-mail] [Ref. number] [Author] Change Management Plan [Sub-Project, phase, etc.] The project change management plan is
The Generic Drug Review Dashboard
This is the Quarterly Update (data as of April 1, 2016) to the Generic Drug Review Dashboard. The Office of Generic Drugs (OGD) is providing this update to improve transparency as we continue implementation
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs for Treatment Use Qs & As DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions regarding
Guidance for Industry Certification Process for Designated Medical Gases
Guidance for Industry Certification Process for Designated Medical Gases DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions regarding this draft
POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PROGRAMS. CDER Master Data Management. Table of Contents
POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PROGRAMS CDER Master Data Management Table of Contents PURPOSE...1 BACKGROUND...1 POLICIES...2 RESPONSIBILITIES...2 PROCEDURES...4 REFERENCES...5 DEFINITIONS...5
Report to Congress. Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act of 2012 Section 1131
Report to Congress Strategic Integrated Management Plan for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), and the Center for Devices and Radiological
TOWN OF SILVERTHORNE, COLORADO RFP for Independent Professional Auditing Services
Nature of Services Required A. General The Town is soliciting the services of qualified firms of certified public accountants to audit its financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011,
