Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania. Final Report
|
|
|
- Adrian Pierce
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania Final Report UNICONSULT Universal Transport Consulting GmbH Juli 2010
2 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania Final Report This study was drawn up by: UNICONSULT Universal Transport Consulting GmbH Container Terminal Burchardkai Hamburg Germany Tel.: + 49 (0) Fax: + 49 (0) uniconsult@uniconsult-hamburg.de Web: Copyright by UC 28 May 2010
3 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 3 0. SUMMARY The Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor In May 2007 the German federal States of Berlin, Brandenburg, Mecklenburg West Pomerania, Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt brought into being an initiative to build up a development corridor that runs from Scandinavia through the new federal States to the Adriatic. The corridor, in which about 93 million people live, has the highest density of capital regions in Europe and shows a GDP of 2.5 billion euro. It links areas that are characterised by historically developed economic and cultural relationships. The division of Europe after the Second World War, however, tore out the middle area of this corridor from this structure that had evolved. The building-up of the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor is intended to initiate cross-border co-operation efforts, which will enable a closer dovetailing of the regions and thereby promote the economic and cultural development of the corridor area. This orientation of the development of the corridor was recorded in the Berlin Declaration of 30 November Figure 1 The Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor Source: An important component of the development of the corridor is an improvement in attainability for people, goods and services along the north south axis between the Baltic Sea area and the Adriatic region. The Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor does, however, find itself in considerable competition with various other corridors.
4 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 4 UNICONSULT Universal Transport Consulting GmbH was therefore commissioned to undertake an evaluation of the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor. The competing corridors were defined, on the one side, as the West Corridor through Schleswig- Holstein and, on the other side, the East Corridor also known as the CETC 1 through the port of Swinoujscie (see the following figure). The more easterly corridor 2 that runs through the ports of Gdansk/Gdynia was not considered further in this study. Figure 2 The Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor and the competing corridors West Corridor CETC East Corridor Source: UNICONSULT, based on maps of the Mecklenburg West Pomerania Ministry of Transport, Construction and State Development. Preconditions of the evaluation The evaluation takes place on the basis of definite logistic chains. Each logistic chain is characterised by the following features: 1 2 Central European Transport Corridor The corridor corresponds to Priorities 23 and 25 of the Trans-European Transport Network.
5 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 5 Source Target link: A total of four regions in the central European hinterland and five sea ports Gedser 3, Trelleborg 3,, and in Scandinavia and the Baltic were selected. A large part of the transports handled in these ports is indeed conveyed further into the hinterland (and vice versa), but this transport sector has no effect on the evaluation of the corridors, so that these ports can be considered either as starting-points or destinations as applicable. Figure 3 Overview of the places of origin or destination Trelleborg/Malmö Gedser/Rödby Prag München Wien Source: UNICONSULT Course of the routes: For each of the Source Target links there are seven alternative courses of the route that can be chosen (see the following figure). An exception applies to the links to and from, and. These connections are not reasonably open to being served by the Fehmarn route either by the linear route or the future fixed crossing and are therefore excluded from consideration. 3 In this study the ports of Gedser and Trelleborg are considered as starting-points or, as applicable, destinations of transports that are being routed via German Baltic Sea ports or, as applicable, Świnoujście (see the following expositions of the course of the route). For the purpose of evaluating the route via Fehmarn Belt, however, neither of these two ports is suitable, as this route runs neither through Gedser nor Trelleborg (this applies both to the use of the linear route and to the future fixed crossing of the Fehmarn Belt). For this reason Rödby or, as applicable, Malmö are chosen as alternative starting-points or, as applicable, destinations for the Fehmarn Belt route.
6 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 6 Figure 4 Presentation of the courses of alternative routes Kiel Fehmarn (Vogelfluglinie + feste Querung) Sassnitz Swinoujscie West- Korridor Rostock Travemünde Ostsee-Adria- Korridor CETC Source: UNICONSULT Transport carriers: For each of the previously established combinations two combinations of transport carriers come into consideration: in one case exclusively road transport, in the other the use of combined transport (CT), in each case in connection with the ferry crossing. 4 In total 232 possible logistic chains result from this, which can be derived from the following table. Whether the logistic chains currently exist was not taken into consideration initially. For example, ferry routes that are not served at present were also included in the evaluation. The evaluation was therefore concerned with all theoretically possible and reasonable logistic chains. In a later stage only the currently existing routes are considered. 4 This lapses in the case of the future fixed crossing of the Fehmarn Belt.
7 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 7 Table 1 Overview of the logistic chains considered Via Kiel Travemünde Fehmarn Belt (fixed crossing) By the linear route Rostock Sassnitz Swinoujscie Gedser/Rödby Trelleborg/Malmö Gedser/Rödby Trelleborg/Malmö Gedser/Rödby Trelleborg/Malmö Gedser/Rödby Trelleborg/Malmö Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Lorry + ro-ro CT + ro-ro Source: UNICONSULT
8 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 8 The evaluation of the logistic chains takes place on the basis of the following three criteria: transport costs, duration of transport, CO 2 emissions. For transport purely by road the transport costs and the CO 2 emissions are calculated per lorry. In this process, the use of an articulated lorry is assumed. To retain a unified basis of measurement for evaluating the corridors, the values in CT and for the ferry crossing are determined per articulated lorry. For the transport costs of transport by lorry and conveyance by CT the values of the both the following tables were accepted. Table 2 Overview of costs for transport by lorry Freight rate (Longdistance) 1.15 /km Toll Öresund crossing Fehmarn Belt crossing Vignette Poland Eurovignette 8.00 Germany 0.18 /km Austria Italy Czech Republic Slovakia Determination of the toll costs depending on the route are obtainable from the Internet pages of the operators of the toll systems 5 Source: UNICONSULT Table 3 Overview of costs for transport by CT Source: UNICONSULT Freight rate 0.85 /Trailer-km Trans-shipment, departure terminal /Trailer Trans-shipment, destination terminal /Trailer Preceding road journey /Trailer Subsequent road journey /Trailer The assumed costs of the ferry crossing per trailer-km are presented in the following table. 5 for Austria: for Italy: for the Czech Republic: for Slovakia:
9 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 9 Table 4 Freight rates for ferry connections by trailer-km Rödby Gedser Trelleborg Kiel Travemünde Puttgarden Rostock Sassnitz Swinoujscie Source: UNICONSULT The following average speeds have been used for the duration of transport on the section that occurs on land: Lorry: 70 km per hour (in Poland 40 km per hour) plus legal driving and rest times, Rail: 50 km per hour (in Poland 35 km per hour) plus 2 hours waiting time at the departure terminal and again at the destination terminal. For the ferry crossing the durations of journey are to be derived from the following table. In addition, 3 hours waiting time at the port are assumed, regardless of whether the preceding or following journey is made by lorry or CT. Table 5 Duration of ferry crossing (in hours) Rödby Gedser Trelleborg Kiel Travemünde Puttgarden Rostock Sassnitz Swinoujscie Source: UNICONSULT Finally, the following values are assumed for the determination of environmental damage depending on the transport carrier. Table 6 CO 2 emissions of the transport carriers considered Source: UNICONSULT Lorry 933 g/km CT 450 g/trailer-km Ferry boat and ro-ro boat 1,390 g/trailer-km
10 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 10 Results The result of the evaluation of the corridors when considered exclusively on the criterion of transport costs is presented in Table 7. In each link only the best two routes are considered. If they comprise part of the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor, they are shown in red. The Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor is the leader in 14 out of the 20 links, in which the route via Sassnitz comes out as particularly successful. Rostock shows clear advantages in the case of Gedser/Rödby traffic. The main competitor is the CETC via Swinoujscie, while the West Corridor occurs in only one link as being among the two best situated routes. Table 7 Overview of transport costs calculation Gedser/ Rödby Trelleborg/ Malmö 1. Rostock (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 2. Rostock (Lorry) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) 2. Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 2. Travemünde (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) 1. Rostock (Lorry) Sassnitz (CT) Swinoujscie (Lorry) Swinoujscie (Lorry) Swinoujscie (Lorry) 2. Rostock (CT) Rostock (Lorry) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Source: UNICONSULT Table 8 contains the results when the duration of the transport is considered. The fastest two routes are shown for each link. If they comprise part of the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor, they are shown in red. When considered exclusively on the basis of transport speed, the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor is the leader in 16 out of the 20 links, of which 12 are via the Rostock route. The main competitor in the case of transports in the eastern Baltic Sea area is the CETC. On the links from/to Gedser/Rödby and Trelleborg/Malmö the future fixed crossing at Fehmarn Belt will be the greatest competitor.
11 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 11 Table 8 Overview of the calculation of the duration of transport Gedser/ Rödby Trelleborg/ Malmö 1. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) 2. Rostock (CT) Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) 2. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Rostock (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) 1. Rostock (Lorry) Sassnitz (Lorry) Rostock (Lorry) Rostock (Lorry) Rostock (Lorry) 2. Fehmarn Belt (Lorry) Rostock (Lorry) Swinoujscie (Lorry) Swinoujscie (Lorry) Swinoujscie (Lorry) 1. Rostock (Lorry) Sassnitz (Lorry) Swinoujscie (Lorry) Swinoujscie (Lorry) Swinoujscie (Lorry) 2. Sassnitz (Lorry) Rostock (Lorry) Rostock (Lorry) Rostock (Lorry) Rostock (Lorry) Source: UNICONSULT The two environmentally most friendly routes for each link are to be derived from Table 9. If they comprise part of the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor, they are shown in red. When considered exclusively on the basis of CO 2 emissions, the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor is the best alternative in 14 out of 20 links, in particular via the Sassnitz route into the eastern Baltic Sea. The main competitor in the case of these transports is the CETC. In the links from/to Gedser/Rödby and Trelleborg/Malmö Rostock comes out better than Sassnitz. The future fixed crossing at Fehmarn Belt appears set to be the greatest competitor from a purely environmental perspective. Table 9 Overview of the calculation of CO 2 emissions Gedser/ Rödby Trelleborg/ Malmö 1. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 2. Linear route (CT) Linear route (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 2. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) 1. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 2. Linear route (CT) Linear route (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 2. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Source: UNICONSULT The results when all three criteria are considered are contained in Table 10. Again, the best two routes for each link are shown. If they comprise part of the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor, they are shown in red.
12 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 12 In 16 out of the 20 links, the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor is shown as being the best alternative. The Sassnitz route is the leading axis in 13 cases, while the route via Rostock comes out particularly well in links from/to Gedser/Rödby. The main competitor for transports to, and is the CETC; for the links from/to Gedser/Rödby it will be the West Corridor through the future fixed crossing at Fehmarn Belt after its completion. In the case of transports from/to Trelleborg/Malmö the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor even in all cases is in the first two places. Table 10 Overview of the results when all the evaluation criteria are considered Gedser/ Rödby Trelleborg/ Malmö 1. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 2. Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) 2. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Rostock (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 2. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Rostock (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) Sassnitz (CT) 2. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Rostock (CT) Swinoujscie (CT) Rostock (CT) Swinoujscie (Lorry) Source: UNICONSULT Hitherto all the theoretically possible logistic chains have been considered, but the analysis is now limited to combinations that currently exist. This excludes the following connections: CT from/to Sassnitz, Swinoujscie, and the via the linear route. The following ferry connections: from Kiel: to Gedser, Trelleborg, from Travemünde: to Gedser, from Rostock: to, from Sassnitz: to Gedser, from Swinoujscie: to Gedser,,,. In this way the number of possible logistic chains is reduced from 232 to 104. The results when the above-mentioned restrictions are taken into consideration are presented in Table 11.
13 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 13 There are no noteworthy changes to the positive statements previously made regarding the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor. It still remains the most attractive corridor. In 13 out of the 20 links examined the route via Mecklenburg West Pomerania is the most attractive, furthermore the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor is the second-best alternative in at least five links. It becomes clear that within the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor there is a shift in favour of the Rostock route, which takes first place in 11 links, while the Sassnitz axis represents the best choice only twice (and the second-best choice three times). The main cause for this shift is firstly the discontinuation of various ferry connections, through which numerous routes are basically no longer available for travel. Furthermore, the partial non-consideration of CT also leads to changes, because, as became clear in the previous section, CT mostly comes out better than exclusively road transport on the assumptions made. This works particularly to the disadvantage of the Sassnitz route, which declines in attraction when travel by lorry is considered exclusively. Table 11 Overview of the results when all the evaluation criteria and restrictions are considered Gedser/ Rödby Trelleborg/ Malmö 1. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Rostock (CT) Kiel (CT) Rostock (CT) Travemünde (CT) 2. Rostock (CT) Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (Lorry) Travemünde (CT) Kiel (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) Kiel (CT) Rostock (CT) Travemünde (CT) 2. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (Lorry) Travemünde (CT) Kiel (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) Kiel (CT) Rostock (CT) Travemünde (CT) 2. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Fehmarn Belt (CT) Sassnitz (Lorry) Travemünde (CT) Kiel (CT) 1. Rostock (CT) Rostock (CT) Sassnitz (Lorry) Rostock (CT) Sassnitz (Lorry) 2. Fehmarn Belt (CT) Fehmarn Belt (CT) Kiel (CT) Rostock (Lorry) Travemünde (CT) Source: UNICONSULT It needs to be taken into account that the above-mentioned restrictions result from the current market situation and therefore represent only a snapshot at one moment. These restrictions are subject to permanent change, e.g. through the development of new, or the termination of existing, ferry or CT connections, so that in the mediumand long-term perspectives the consideration of all theoretically possible logistic chains for a complete evaluation of the corridors is essentially more meaningful. Summing-up Thanks to its good road and rail connections to its seaports Mecklenburg West Pomerania offers outstanding conditions for goods transport on the north south axis and in the direction of Russia or the Baltic.
14 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 14 A well-developed transport infrastructure generates additional goods transport, and thereby jobs and value creation in the ports region of the State, but even in the hinterland a high-value infrastructure also contributes to the establishment of logistics-related enterprises. The Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor is outstandingly placed in the competition with the competing corridors. The strengths of the Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor should be presented assertively in the case of the goods-transport economy in the relevant source and target regions, in order to generate further revenue from goods. In this way the significance of Mecklenburg West Pomerania as an important logistic focal point between Scandinavia and southern Europe, and between Scandinavia and south-eastern Europe, as well as in the direction of the Baltic and Russia will increase.
15 Evaluation of Goods Traffic Corridors through Mecklenburg West Pomerania 15 APPENDIX
16 Via Kiel Destination lorry (km) Distance CT Distnace RoRo Duration of transport (h) CO2-emmission (kg) Total therefrom G therefrom PL Lorry CT RoRo Total Lorry CT RoRo Total - Lorry+RoRo ,6 5 31,6 821,0 166,8 987,8 CT+RoRo ,0 5 30,0 405,5 166,8 572,3 - Lorry+RoRo ,6 9 35,6 821,0 360, ,1 CT+RoRo ,0 9 34,0 405,5 360,0 765,5 - Lorry+RoRo , ,6 821, , ,7 CT+RoRo , ,0 405, , ,1 - Lorry+RoRo , ,6 821, , ,0 CT+RoRo , ,0 405, , ,4 - Lorry+RoRo , ,6 821, , ,0 CT+RoRo , ,0 405, , ,4 - Lorry+RoRo ,7 5 37, ,5 166, ,3 CT+RoRo ,6 5 38,6 598,1 166,8 764,9 - Lorry+RoRo ,7 9 41, ,5 360, ,5 CT+RoRo ,6 9 42,6 598,1 360,0 958,1 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,6 598, , ,7 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,4 CT+RoRo , ,6 598, , ,0 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,5 CT+RoRo , ,6 598, , ,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,4 5 35, ,4 166, ,2 CT+RoRo ,9 5 33,9 492,3 166,8 659,1 - Lorry+RoRo ,4 9 39, ,4 360, ,4 CT+RoRo ,9 9 37,9 492,3 360,0 852,3 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,9 492, , ,0 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,3 CT+RoRo , ,9 492, , ,2 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,4 CT+RoRo , ,9 492, , ,3 - Lorry+RoRo ,7 5 29,7 693,2 166,8 860,0 CT+RoRo ,4 5 27,4 346,1 166,8 512,9 - Lorry+RoRo ,7 9 33,7 693,2 360, ,2 CT+RoRo ,4 9 31,4 346,1 360,0 706,1 - Lorry+RoRo , ,7 693, , ,9 CT+RoRo , ,4 346, , ,7 - Lorry+RoRo , ,7 693, , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,4 346, , ,0 - Lorry+RoRo , ,7 693, , ,2 CT+RoRo , ,4 346, , ,0
17 Via Kiel Transport costs Costs RoRo (per km) RoRo Travel costs Toll Fehmarnbelt Toll Öresund Toll G Toll I Toll A Toll SK Toll CZ Toll PL Toll S / DK Total - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,00 0,00 0,00 161,04 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,24 CT+RoRo 2, ,05 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,00 0,00 0,00 161,04 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,64 CT+RoRo 1, ,45 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,00 0,00 0,00 161,04 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,44 CT+RoRo 0, ,25 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,00 0,00 0,00 161,04 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,54 CT+RoRo 0, ,35 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,00 0,00 0,00 161,04 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,54 CT+RoRo 0, ,35 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,90 0,00 0,00 176,78 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,77 CT+RoRo 2, ,85 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,90 0,00 0,00 176,78 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,17 CT+RoRo 1, ,25 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,90 0,00 0,00 176,78 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,97 CT+RoRo 0, ,05 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,90 0,00 0,00 176,78 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,07 CT+RoRo 0, ,15 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,90 0,00 0,00 176,78 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,07 CT+RoRo 0, ,15 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,20 CT+RoRo 2, ,10 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,60 CT+RoRo 1, ,50 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,40 CT+RoRo 0, ,30 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,50 CT+RoRo 0, ,40 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,50 CT+RoRo 0, ,40 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,21 CT+RoRo 2, ,85 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,61 CT+RoRo 1, ,25 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,41 CT+RoRo 0, ,05 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,51 CT+RoRo 0, ,15 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,51 CT+RoRo 0, ,15
18 Via Travemünde Distance lorry (km) Distance CT Distance RoRo Duration of transport (h) CO2-emissions (kg) Total thereform G therefrom PL Lorry CT RoRo Total Lorry CT RoRo Total - Lorry+RoRo ,2 4 30,2 795,8 141,8 937,6 CT+RoRo ,6 4 27,6 373,5 141,8 515,3 - Lorry+RoRo ,2 7,5 33,7 795,8 329, ,3 CT+RoRo ,6 7,5 31,1 373,5 329,4 702,9 - Lorry+RoRo , ,2 795,8 999, ,3 CT+RoRo , ,6 373,5 999, ,9 - Lorry+RoRo , ,2 795, , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,6 373, , ,8 - Lorry+RoRo , ,2 795, , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,6 373, , ,8 - Lorry+RoRo ,3 4 36, ,3 141, ,1 CT+RoRo ,2 4 36,2 566,1 141,8 707,9 - Lorry+RoRo ,3 7,5 39, ,3 329, ,7 CT+RoRo ,2 7,5 39,7 566,1 329,4 895,5 - Lorry+RoRo , , ,3 999, ,7 CT+RoRo , ,2 566,1 999, ,5 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,6 CT+RoRo , ,2 566, , ,4 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,6 CT+RoRo , ,2 566, , ,4 - Lorry+RoRo ,4 4 33, ,9 141, ,7 CT+RoRo ,3 4 31,3 456,8 141,8 598,5 - Lorry+RoRo ,4 7,5 36, ,9 329, ,3 CT+RoRo ,3 7,5 34,8 456,8 329,4 786,2 - Lorry+RoRo , , ,9 999, ,3 CT+RoRo , ,3 456,8 999, ,2 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,2 CT+RoRo , ,3 456, , ,0 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,2 CT+RoRo , ,3 456, , ,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,7 4 16,7 629,8 141,8 771,6 CT+RoRo ,8 4 24,8 310,5 141,8 452,3 - Lorry+RoRo ,7 7,5 20,2 629,8 329,4 959,2 CT+RoRo ,8 7,5 28,3 310,5 329,4 639,9 - Lorry+RoRo , ,7 629,8 999, ,2 CT+RoRo , ,8 310,5 999, ,9 - Lorry+RoRo , ,7 629, , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,8 310, , ,8 - Lorry+RoRo , ,7 629, , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,8 310, , ,8
19 Via Travemünde Transport costs Costs RoRo (per km) RoRo Travel costs Toll Fehmarnbelt Toll Öresund Toll G Toll I Toll A Toll SK Toll CZ Toll PL Toll S / DK Total - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,95 0,00 0,00 156,10 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,73 CT+RoRo 2, ,18 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,95 0,00 0,00 156,10 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,25 CT+RoRo 1, ,70 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,95 0,00 0,00 156,10 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,35 CT+RoRo 0, ,80 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,95 0,00 0,00 156,10 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,05 CT+RoRo 0, ,50 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,95 0,00 0,00 156,10 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,55 CT+RoRo 0, ,00 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,85 0,00 0,00 172,02 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,44 CT+RoRo 2, ,98 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,85 0,00 0,00 172,02 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,96 CT+RoRo 1, ,50 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,85 0,00 0,00 172,02 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,06 CT+RoRo 0, ,60 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,85 0,00 0,00 172,02 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,76 CT+RoRo 0, ,30 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,85 0,00 0,00 172,02 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,26 CT+RoRo 0, ,80 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,40 0,00 0,00 103,40 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,19 CT+RoRo 2, ,43 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,40 0,00 0,00 103,40 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,71 CT+RoRo 1, ,95 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,40 0,00 0,00 103,40 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,81 CT+RoRo 0, ,05 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,40 0,00 0,00 103,40 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,51 CT+RoRo 0, ,75 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,40 0,00 0,00 103,40 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,01 CT+RoRo 0, ,25 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,25 0,00 0,00 103,40 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,05 CT+RoRo 2, ,18 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,25 0,00 0,00 103,40 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,57 CT+RoRo 1, ,70 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,25 0,00 0,00 103,40 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,67 CT+RoRo 0, ,80 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,25 0,00 0,00 103,40 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,37 CT+RoRo 0, ,50 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,25 0,00 0,00 103,40 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,87 CT+RoRo 0, ,00
20 Via Fehmarnbelt Distance lorry (km) Distance CT Distance RoRo Duration of transport (h) CO2-emmissions (kg) Total therefrom G therefrom PL Lorry CT RoRo Total Lorry CT RoRo Total - Lorry+RoRo ,5 27,5 878,0 0,0 878,0 CT+RoRo ,5 25,5 416,7 0,0 416,7 - Lorry+RoRo ,3 30, ,8 0, ,8 CT+RoRo ,7 29,7 511,2 0,0 511,2 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,6 33, ,5 0, ,5 CT+RoRo ,1 34,1 609,3 0,0 609,3 - Lorry+RoRo ,4 47, ,3 0, ,3 CT+RoRo ,3 38,3 703,8 0,0 703,8 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,7 30, ,1 0, ,1 CT+RoRo ,2 29,2 500,0 0,0 500,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,5 33, ,9 0, ,9 CT+RoRo ,4 33,4 594,5 0,0 594,5 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,9 24,9 711,9 0,0 711,9 CT+RoRo ,7 22,7 353,7 0,0 353,7 - Lorry+RoRo ,7 27,7 894,7 0,0 894,7 CT+RoRo ,9 26,9 448,2 0,0 448,2 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 0,0 0,0
21 Via Fehmarnbelt Transport costs Costs RoRo (per km) RoRo Travel osts Toll Fehmarnbelt Toll Öresund Toll G Toll I Toll A Toll SK Toll CZ Toll PL Toll S / DK Total - Lorry+RoRo ,15 255,26 0,00 168,54 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,95 CT+RoRo 0 255, ,36 - Lorry+RoRo ,55 255,26 100,50 168,54 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 8, ,85 CT+RoRo 0 255,26 100, ,36 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo ,90 255,26 0,00 185,01 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,06 CT+RoRo 0 255, ,16 - Lorry+RoRo ,30 255,26 100,50 185,01 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 8, ,96 CT+RoRo 0 255,26 100, ,16 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo ,45 255,26 0,00 115,84 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,25 CT+RoRo 0 255, ,61 - Lorry+RoRo ,85 255,26 100,50 115,84 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 8, ,15 CT+RoRo 0 255,26 100, ,61 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 877,45 255,26 0,00 115,84 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,26 CT+RoRo 0 255, ,36 - Lorry+RoRo ,85 255,26 100,50 115,84 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 8, ,16 CT+RoRo 0 255,26 100, ,36 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0 - Lorry+RoRo 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0
22 Via Vogelfluglinie (Direct line/'as the crow flies"-line) Distance lorry (km) Distance CT Distance RoRo Duration of transport (h) CO2-emmissions(kg) Total therefrom G therefrom PL Lorry CT RoRo Total Lorry CT RoRo Total - Lorry+RoRo ,2 1 28,2 859,3 27,8 887,1 CT+RoRo ,1 1 26,1 407,7 27,8 435,5 - Lorry+RoRo ,2 27, ,0 CT+RoRo ,3 1 30,3 502,2 27,8 530,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,3 1 34, ,8 27, ,6 CT+RoRo ,7 1 34,7 600,3 27,8 628,1 - Lorry+RoRo ,1 1 48, ,7 27, ,5 CT+RoRo ,9 1 38,9 694,8 27,8 722,6 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,4 1 31, ,4 27, ,2 CT+RoRo ,8 1 29,8 491,0 27,8 518,8 - Lorry+RoRo ,2 1 34, ,3 27, ,1 CT+RoRo ,0 1 34,0 585,5 27,8 613,3 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,7 1 25,7 693,2 27,8 721,0 CT+RoRo ,3 1 23,3 344,7 27,8 372,5 - Lorry+RoRo ,5 1 28,5 876,1 27,8 903,9 CT+RoRo ,5 1 27,5 439,2 27,8 467,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 0,0 CT+RoRo 0,0
23 Via Vogelfluglinie (Direct line/"as the crow flies"-line) Transport costs Costs RoRo (per km) RoRo Travel osts Toll Fehmarnbelt Toll Öresund Toll D Toll I Toll A Toll SK Toll CZ Toll PL Toll S / DK Total - Lorry+RoRo 12, ,15 0,00 0,00 168,54 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,89 CT+RoRo 12, ,30 - Lorry+RoRo 12, ,55 0,00 100,50 168,54 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 8, ,79 CT+RoRo 12, ,80 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 12, ,90 0,00 0,00 185,01 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,00 CT+RoRo 12, ,10 - Lorry+RoRo 12, ,30 0,00 100,50 185,01 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 8, ,90 CT+RoRo 12, ,60 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 12, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,20 CT+RoRo 12, ,55 - Lorry+RoRo 12, ,85 0,00 100,50 115,84 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 8, ,10 CT+RoRo 12, ,05 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 12, ,45 0,00 0,00 115,84 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,21 CT+RoRo 12, ,30 - Lorry+RoRo 12, ,85 0,00 100,50 115,84 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 8, ,11 CT+RoRo 12, ,80 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0,00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 CT+RoRo 0,00
24 Via Rostock Distance lorry (km) Distance CT Distance RoRo Duration of transport (h) CO2-emmissions(kg) Total therefrom G therefrom PL Lorry CT RoRo Total Lorry CT RoRo Total - Lorry+RoRo ,2 1,75 26,95 729,6 62,6 792,2 CT+RoRo ,4 1,75 26,1 391,1 62,6 453,6 - Lorry+RoRo ,2 6 31,2 729,6 214,1 943,7 CT+RoRo ,4 6 30,4 391,1 214,1 605,1 - Lorry+RoRo , ,2 729,6 891, ,6 CT+RoRo , ,4 391,1 891, ,0 - Lorry+RoRo , ,2 729, , ,5 CT+RoRo , ,4 391, , ,9 - Lorry+RoRo , ,2 729, , ,3 CT+RoRo , ,4 391, , ,7 - Lorry+RoRo ,3 1,75 33, ,1 62, ,6 CT+RoRo ,7 1,75 34,4 577,8 62,6 640,4 - Lorry+RoRo ,3 6 37, ,1 214, ,1 CT+RoRo ,7 6 38,7 577,8 214,1 791,9 - Lorry+RoRo , , ,1 891, ,1 CT+RoRo , ,7 577,8 891, ,8 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,9 CT+RoRo , ,7 577, , ,7 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,7 CT+RoRo , ,7 577, , ,5 - Lorry+RoRo ,1 1,75 29,9 915,3 62,6 977,8 CT+RoRo ,9 1,75 27,6 424,8 62,6 487,4 - Lorry+RoRo ,1 6 34,1 915,3 214, ,3 CT+RoRo ,9 6 31,9 424,8 214,1 638,9 - Lorry+RoRo , ,1 915,3 891, ,3 CT+RoRo , ,9 424,8 891, ,8 - Lorry+RoRo , ,1 915, , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,9 424, , ,7 - Lorry+RoRo , ,1 915, , ,9 CT+RoRo , ,9 424, , ,5 - Lorry+RoRo ,3 1,75 13,1 542,1 62,6 604,6 CT+RoRo ,4 1,75 21,1 278,6 62,6 341,1 - Lorry+RoRo ,3 6 17,3 542,1 214,1 756,1 CT+RoRo ,4 6 25,4 278,6 214,1 492,6 - Lorry+RoRo , ,3 542,1 891, ,1 CT+RoRo , ,4 278,6 891, ,5 - Lorry+RoRo , ,3 542, , ,9 CT+RoRo , ,4 278, , ,4 - Lorry+RoRo , ,3 542, , ,7 CT+RoRo , ,4 278, , ,2
25 Via Rostock Transport costs Costs RoRo (per km) RoRo Travel osts Toll Fehmarnbelt Toll Öresund Toll G Toll I Toll A Toll SK Toll CZ Toll PL Toll S / DK Total - Lorry+RoRo 4, ,30 0,00 0,00 143,11 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,11 CT+RoRo 4, ,35 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,30 0,00 0,00 143,11 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,03 CT+RoRo 2, ,27 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,30 0,00 0,00 143,11 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,52 CT+RoRo 0, ,76 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,30 0,00 0,00 143,11 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,41 CT+RoRo 0, ,65 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,30 0,00 0,00 143,11 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,91 CT+RoRo 0, ,15 - Lorry+RoRo 4, ,20 0,00 0,00 158,84 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,63 CT+RoRo 4, ,10 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,20 0,00 0,00 158,84 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,55 CT+RoRo 2, ,02 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,20 0,00 0,00 158,84 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,04 CT+RoRo 0, ,51 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,20 0,00 0,00 158,84 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,93 CT+RoRo 0, ,40 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,20 0,00 0,00 158,84 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,43 CT+RoRo 0, ,90 - Lorry+RoRo 4, ,15 0,00 0,00 86,19 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,75 CT+RoRo 4, ,10 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,15 0,00 0,00 86,19 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,67 CT+RoRo 2, ,02 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,15 0,00 0,00 86,19 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,16 CT+RoRo 0, ,51 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,15 0,00 0,00 86,19 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,05 CT+RoRo 0, ,40 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,15 0,00 0,00 86,19 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,55 CT+RoRo 0, ,90 - Lorry+RoRo 4, ,15 0,00 0,00 86,19 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0,00 967,76 CT+RoRo 4, ,85 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,15 0,00 0,00 86,19 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,68 CT+RoRo 2, ,77 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,15 0,00 0,00 86,19 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,17 CT+RoRo 0, ,26 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,15 0,00 0,00 86,19 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,06 CT+RoRo 0, ,15 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,15 0,00 0,00 86,19 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,56 CT+RoRo 0, ,65
26 Via Sassnitz Distance lorry (km) Distance CT Distance RoRo Duration of transport (h) CO2-emmissions (kg) Total therefrom G therefrom PL Lorry CT RoRo Total Lorry CT RoRo Total - Lorry+RoRo ,9 3,5 30,4 842,5 155,7 998,2 CT+RoRo ,5 3,5 29,0 415,8 155,7 571,5 - Lorry+RoRo ,9 4 30,9 842,5 154,3 996,8 CT+RoRo ,5 4 29,5 415,8 154,3 570,1 - Lorry+RoRo , ,9 842,5 697, ,3 CT+RoRo , ,5 415,8 697, ,6 - Lorry+RoRo , ,9 842, , ,7 CT+RoRo , ,5 415, , ,0 - Lorry+RoRo , ,9 842, , ,9 CT+RoRo , ,5 415, , ,2 - Lorry+RoRo ,5 36, ,0 155, ,6 CT+RoRo ,8 3,5 37,3 602,6 155,7 758,2 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 154, ,2 CT+RoRo ,8 4 37,8 602,6 154,3 756,8 - Lorry+RoRo ,0 697, ,7 CT+RoRo , ,8 602,6 697, ,3 - Lorry+RoRo , , ,2 CT+RoRo , ,8 602, , ,8 - Lorry+RoRo , , ,3 CT+RoRo , ,8 602, , ,9 - Lorry+RoRo ,2 3,5 32,7 989,9 155, ,6 CT+RoRo ,9 3,5 30,4 447,8 155,7 603,4 - Lorry+RoRo ,2 4 33,2 989,9 154, ,2 CT+RoRo ,9 4 30,9 447,8 154,3 602,0 - Lorry+RoRo , ,2 989,9 697, ,7 CT+RoRo , ,9 447,8 697, ,5 - Lorry+RoRo , ,2 989, , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,9 447, , ,0 - Lorry+RoRo , ,2 989, , ,3 CT+RoRo , ,9 447, , ,1 - Lorry+RoRo ,5 3, ,8 155,7 771,5 CT+RoRo ,4 3,5 23,9 301,5 155,7 457,2 - Lorry+RoRo ,5 4 16,5 615,8 154,3 770,1 CT+RoRo ,4 4 24,4 301,5 154,3 455,8 - Lorry+RoRo , ,5 615,8 697, ,6 CT+RoRo , ,4 301,5 697,8 999,3 - Lorry+RoRo , ,5 615, , ,0 CT+RoRo , ,4 301, , ,7 - Lorry+RoRo , ,5 615, , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,4 301, , ,9
27 Via Sassnitz Transport costs Costs RoRo (per km) RoRo Travel osts Toll Fehmarnbelt Toll Öresund Toll G Toll I Toll A Toll SK Toll CZ Toll PL Toll S / DK Total - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,45 0,00 0,00 165,25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,50 CT+RoRo 2, ,20 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,45 0,00 0,00 165,25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,92 CT+RoRo 2, ,62 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,45 0,00 0,00 165,25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,30 CT+RoRo 0, ,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,45 0,00 0,00 165,25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,20 CT+RoRo 0, ,90 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,45 0,00 0,00 165,25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,70 CT+RoRo 0, ,40 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,35 0,00 0,00 180,99 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,03 CT+RoRo 2, ,95 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,35 0,00 0,00 180,99 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,45 CT+RoRo 2, ,37 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,35 0,00 0,00 180,99 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,83 CT+RoRo 0, ,75 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,35 0,00 0,00 180,99 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,73 CT+RoRo 0, ,65 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,35 0,00 0,00 180,99 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,23 CT+RoRo 0, ,15 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,15 0,00 0,00 100,65 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,31 CT+RoRo 2, ,55 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,15 0,00 0,00 100,65 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,73 CT+RoRo 2, ,97 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,15 0,00 0,00 100,65 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,11 CT+RoRo 0, ,35 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,15 0,00 0,00 100,65 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,01 CT+RoRo 0, ,25 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,15 0,00 0,00 100,65 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 0,00 0, ,51 CT+RoRo 0, ,75 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,00 0,00 0,00 100,65 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,17 CT+RoRo 2, ,30 - Lorry+RoRo 2, ,00 0,00 0,00 100,65 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,59 CT+RoRo 2, ,72 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,00 0,00 0,00 100,65 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,97 CT+RoRo 0, ,10 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,00 0,00 0,00 100,65 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,87 CT+RoRo 0, ,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,00 0,00 0,00 100,65 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 0,00 0, ,37 CT+RoRo 0, ,50
28 Via Swinoujscie Distance lorry (km) Distance CT Distance RoRo Duration of transport (h) CO2-emmissions (kg) Total therefrom G therefrom PL Lorry CT RoRo Total Lorry CT RoRo Total - Lorry+RoRo ,6 5 32,6 802,4 298, ,2 CT+RoRo ,3 5 33,3 433,4 298,9 732,2 - Lorry+RoRo ,6 7,5 35,1 802,4 332, ,6 CT+RoRo ,3 7,5 35,8 433,4 332,2 765,6 - Lorry+RoRo , ,6 802,4 756, ,5 CT+RoRo , ,3 433,4 756, ,5 - Lorry+RoRo , ,6 802, , ,3 CT+RoRo , ,3 433, , ,2 - Lorry+RoRo , ,6 802, , ,1 CT+RoRo , ,3 433, , ,1 - Lorry+RoRo ,6 5 38, ,9 298, ,8 CT+RoRo ,6 5 41,6 620,1 298,9 919,0 - Lorry+RoRo ,6 7,5 41, ,9 332, ,1 CT+RoRo ,6 7,5 44,1 620,1 332,2 952,3 - Lorry+RoRo , , ,9 756, ,1 CT+RoRo , ,6 620,1 756, ,3 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,8 CT+RoRo , ,6 620, , ,0 - Lorry+RoRo , , , , ,6 CT+RoRo , ,6 620, , ,8 - Lorry+RoRo ,5 5 34,5 931,1 298, ,0 CT+RoRo ,4 5 32,9 390,6 298,9 689,5 - Lorry+RoRo ,5 7, ,1 332, ,3 CT+RoRo ,4 7,5 35,4 390,6 332,2 722,8 - Lorry+RoRo , ,5 931,1 756, ,3 CT+RoRo , ,9 390,6 756, ,8 - Lorry+RoRo , ,5 931, , ,0 CT+RoRo , ,9 390, , ,5 - Lorry+RoRo , ,5 931, , ,8 CT+RoRo , ,9 390, , ,3 - Lorry+RoRo ,8 5 17,8 557,9 298,9 856,8 CT+RoRo ,3 5 27,3 298,8 298,9 597,7 - Lorry+RoRo ,8 7,5 20,3 557,9 332,2 890,1 CT+RoRo ,3 7,5 29,8 298,8 332,2 631,0 - Lorry+RoRo , ,8 557,9 756, ,1 CT+RoRo , ,3 298,8 756, ,0 - Lorry+RoRo , ,8 557, , ,8 CT+RoRo , ,3 298, , ,7 - Lorry+RoRo , ,8 557, , ,6 CT+RoRo , ,3 298, , ,5
29 Via Swinoujscie Transport costs Costs RoRo (per km) RoRo Travel osts Toll Fehmarnbelt Toll Öresund Toll G Toll I Toll A Toll SK Toll CZ Toll PL Toll S / DK Total - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,00 0,00 0,00 136,34 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 10,00 0, ,64 CT+RoRo 1, ,85 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,00 0,00 0,00 136,34 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 10,00 0, ,45 CT+RoRo 1, ,66 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,00 0,00 0,00 136,34 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 10,00 0, ,54 CT+RoRo 0, ,75 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,00 0,00 0,00 136,34 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 10,00 0, ,84 CT+RoRo 0, ,05 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,00 0,00 0,00 136,34 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 10,00 0, ,84 CT+RoRo 0, ,05 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,75 0,00 0,00 152,07 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 10,00 0, ,01 CT+RoRo 1, ,60 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,75 0,00 0,00 152,07 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 10,00 0, ,82 CT+RoRo 1, ,41 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,75 0,00 0,00 152,07 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 10,00 0, ,91 CT+RoRo 0, ,50 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,75 0,00 0,00 152,07 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 10,00 0, ,21 CT+RoRo 0, ,80 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,75 0,00 0,00 152,07 34,80 88,09 0,00 0,00 10,00 0, ,21 CT+RoRo 0, ,80 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,70 0,00 0,00 68,26 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 10,00 0, ,97 CT+RoRo 1, ,10 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,70 0,00 0,00 68,26 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 10,00 0, ,78 CT+RoRo 1, ,91 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,70 0,00 0,00 68,26 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 10,00 0, ,87 CT+RoRo 0, ,00 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,70 0,00 0,00 68,26 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 10,00 0, ,17 CT+RoRo 0, ,30 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,70 0,00 0,00 68,26 0,00 22,00 14,17 53,54 10,00 0, ,17 CT+RoRo 0, ,30 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,70 0,00 0,00 68,26 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 10,00 0, ,98 CT+RoRo 1, ,70 - Lorry+RoRo 1, ,70 0,00 0,00 68,26 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 10,00 0, ,79 CT+RoRo 1, ,51 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,70 0,00 0,00 68,26 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 10,00 0, ,88 CT+RoRo 0, ,60 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,70 0,00 0,00 68,26 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 10,00 0, ,18 CT+RoRo 0, ,90 - Lorry+RoRo 0, ,70 0,00 0,00 68,26 0,00 0,00 0,00 12,72 10,00 0, ,18 CT+RoRo 0, ,90
Trade & Transport Corridors. European Projects & Initiatives
Trade & Transport Corridors European Projects & Initiatives Trade Corridors A concept in evolution WORLD BANK Assisting land-locked countries which depend on overland routes to access sea-ports for international
Fehmarnbelt Forecast 2014 - Update of the FTC-Study of 2002
Fehmarnbelt Forecast 2014 - Update of the FTC-Study of 2002 for Femern A/S 2014 Intraplan Consult GmbH Orleansplatz 5a Wentzingerstr. 19 81667 München 79106 Freiburg BVU Beratergruppe Verkehr + Umwelt
Financial Analysis, Traffic Forecast and Analysis of Railway Payment
FIXED LINK ACROSS FEHMARNBELT Trafikministeriet, København Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau- und Wohnungswesen, Berlin Financial Analysis, Traffic Forecast and Analysis of Railway Payment Summary Report
FEHMARN BELT Forecast 2002
Trafikministeriet, København Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau- und Wohnungswesen, Berlin FEHMARN BELT Forecast 2002 April 2003 FTC Fehmarnbelt Traffic Consortium FTC Fehmarnbelt Traffic Consortium BVU
Road freight transport across a fixed Fehmarn Belt link
Road freight transport across a fixed Fehmarn Belt link Per Homann Jespersen 1 Draft version Introduction A fixed link between Denmark and Germany was agreed upon by the Danish and German governments on
Global changes in the structure and directions of trade - impact of China and Russia
Global changes in the structure and directions of trade - impact of China and Russia New transport corridors on the map of Europe TEN-T revision and White Paper What has the crisis changed in the transport
REPORT FEHMARNBELT FIXED LINK. Financial Analysis - February 2003. Main Results. March 2003. Prepared by Sund & Bælt / Femer Bælt
REPORT FEHMARNBELT FIXED LINK Financial Analysis - February 23 Main Results Prepared by Sund & Bælt / Femer Bælt March 23 A division of Sund & Bælt Holding A/S Vester Søgade 1 DK-161 Copenhagen V Tel.
The Danish Transport System. Facts and Figures
The Danish Transport System Facts and Figures 2 The Ministry of Transport Udgivet af: Ministry of Transport Frederiksholms Kanal 27 DK-1220 København K Udarbejdet af: Transportministeriet ISBN, trykt version:
How To Make Money From Shipping
POLZUG INTERMODAL GROUP Operational Programme ERDF Saxony-Anhalt 2007 2013 Project Number: ERDF16.01.6.12.00115 POLZUG INTERMODAL GROUP HAFEN HINTERLAND KONFERENZ MAGDEBURG, 22. NOVEMBER 2013 HAMBURGER
PUBLICATION 2007:9. Transport of Goods through Skåne and Blekinge SUMMARY OF MAIN REPORT
PUBLICATION 2007: Transport of Goods through Skåne and Blekinge SUMMARY OF MAIN REPORT Title: Transport of Goods through Skåne and Blekinge Summary of main report Swedish Road Administration s publication
Intermodal transport in Sweden and Europe
Intermodal transport in Sweden and Europe Do you want to help to reduce CO 2 emissions and at the same time improve your transport economy? Development Routes in Sweden and Europe Benefits Environment
Sustainable goods transport in the Fehmarn-Øresund corridor. Per Homann Jespersen ENSPAC, Roskilde University
Sustainable goods transport in the Fehmarn-Øresund corridor Per Homann Jespersen ENSPAC, Roskilde University phj@ruc.dk The challenge EU White Paper 2001: Decoupling transport from the economy The climate
Optimised rail-ferry connections from Berlin to Scandinavia
1 Optimised rail-ferry connections from Berlin to Scandinavia Dr. Jürgen Murach - Senat Berlin 3rd International Project Workshop INTERFACE Rostock 2 Overall aims of Berlin Transport Policy (Passenger
Cefic Position on Intermodal Transport Network Development
Summary Cefic Position on Intermodal Transport Network Development June 2014 The goal of the European Union to shift 30 % of road transport to intermodal means is very ambitious. The chemical industry
Development of a Concept for the Public Transport Interconnectivity for Savaria International Airport. Report
Development of a Concept for the Public Transport Interconnectivity for Savaria International Airport Report CENTRAL EUROPE Programme Project CHAMPIONS February 2012 Development of a Concept for the Public
A Greener Transport System in Denmark. Environmentally Friendly and Energy Efficient Transport
A Greener Transport System in Denmark Environmentally Friendly and Energy Efficient Transport Udgivet af: Ministry of Transport Frederiksholms Kanal 27 DK-1220 København K Udarbejdet af: Transportministeriet
Workshop: Challenges and cooperation potentials for passenger and goods traffic along the Scandria corridor
Workshop: Challenges and cooperation potentials for passenger and goods traffic along the Scandria corridor Rostock Hausbaumhaus, Wokrenter Str. 40 11.12.2013 9:00 o clock City of Rostock Regional Planning
THE CONTENT OF PRESENTATION. CETC Rout 65. What does it mean?
THE CONTENT OF PRESENTATION CETC Rout 65. What does it mean? The meaning of acronyms Brief history of the concept What does it mean in the European context? What does it meant for involved countries and
European Strategy 2050 TEN-T Methodology: Italian TEN-T network proposal
TEN-T Italian Transport Programme European Strategy 2050 TEN-T Methodology: Italian TEN-T network proposal Green Corridors in the TEN Network 6-7 September 2011 TRENTO Ministero delle Infrastrututre e
The Interreg South Baltic IVA project partnership changed decision makers minds in benefit for South Baltic Area; joint problems, joint solutions
The Interreg South Baltic IVA project partnership changed decision makers minds in benefit for South Baltic Area; joint problems, joint solutions example the N-S axis Rostock- DK Background When the ferry
The results of studies drawn up for the development of the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Core Network Corridor
The results of studies drawn up for the development of the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Core Network Corridor Uwe Sondermann KombiConsult GmbH Trento, 06.03.2015 Presentation of Final Report in December
David Pinka, CACS Ladislav Špaček, SCHP ČR
Tank cleaning station and intermodal transport in The Czech Republic and Slovakia David Pinka, CACS Ladislav Špaček, SCHP ČR ChemLog cleaning meeting, Novara, September 13 th, 2011 1 ChemLog project (Chemical
Marco Polo Project. NePol Express
Marco Polo Project Marcel Sames Director Sales and Business Development POLZUG Intermodal GmbH, Germany 1 POLZUG Intermodal GmbH Founded on December 17 th, 1991, Polzug Intermodal GmbH today is a joint-venture
Corporate insolvencies 2015
Corporate insolvencies 2015 Corporate insolvencies fall by 5.4 percent in 2015, but still cause billion-dollar losses - men lead companies to insolvency twice as often as women 1. Introduction: Sixth consecutive
A PERSPECTIVE ON TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE FROM THE NORTH AND EAST OF EUROPE
1 A PERSPECTIVE ON TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE FROM THE NORTH AND EAST OF EUROPE Prof. Lauri Ojala Oslo, February 28, 2013 2 THIS PRESENTATION ON TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE WILL BRING YOU A global scale on
West Pomerania ready for Swedish investors
West Pomerania ready for Swedish investors Szczecin, 20th October 2010 WEST POMERANIA OUR LOCATION Main features: proximity to Western Europe proximity to Scandinavia access to the Baltic Sea and proximity
PORTS OF. sh i p to no r way
PORTS OF NORWAY sh i p to no r way Annually between 12 and 14 million tonnes of cargo is imported and exported by truck to and from Norway. Norwegian ports work closely with authorities and shipping companies
IRG-Rail (13) 2. Independent Regulators Group Rail IRG Rail Annual Market Monitoring Report
IRG-Rail (13) 2 Independent Regulators Group Rail IRG Rail Annual Market Monitoring Report February 2013 Index 1 Introduction...3 2 Aim of the report...3 3 Methodology...4 4 Findings...5 a) Market structure...5
Trans-European Transport Network
Trans-European Transport Network 1 THE NORTH-ADRIATIC MULTIPORT February 6 th 2009 - Letter of Intent April 17 th 2009 Memorandum of Understanding March 1 st 2010 - Presidents of the ports of Koper, Ravenna,
CUXPORT AUTOMOBILE LOGISTICS
CUXPORT AUTOMOBILE LOGISTICS The RoRo Terminal Operator in Cuxhaven Contract Logistics Freight Logistics Port Logistics MOVING VALUES Multifunctional terminal and service provider for the automobile industry
DB SCHENKERhangartner the proven combination for combined transportation.
Photo: Lukas Mäder hangartner the proven combination for combined transportation. Publishing Data Schenker AG Alfredstraße 81 45130 Essen/Germany Intermodal Transportation Delivering solutions. Subject
Secure parking in the Scandria corridor A description of the safe park concept applied to the Scandria corridor
Secure parking in the Scandria corridor A description of the safe park concept applied to the Scandria corridor 1 3.3 Secure parking in the Scandria corridor 3.3.1. Background: Transporting goods in Europe
Your Multimodal Partner. IBS, the 08/10/10
GEFCO Your Multimodal Partner IBS, the 08/10/10 Summary 1. GEFCO some figures 2. GEFCO strategy and Know-how 3. GEFCO concept 4. GEFCO multimodal corridors 1. GEFCO some figures GEFCO key figures One of
Intermodal Handling TOP PERFORMANCE WITH SMART SOLUTIONS
Intermodal Handling TOP PERFORMANCE WITH SMART SOLUTIONS Intelligent intermodal solutions ensure safe and sustainable transport of goods International trade is constantly changing its ways and requirements
INVENT INNOVATIVE MARKETING STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM OFFERS
INNOVATIVE MARKETING STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM OFFERS Seminar on Creating a sustainable tourism experience World Travel Market 2005 + www.invent- Seite 1 16 th November 2005 Ulrike Rheinberger,
DaGoB Meeting Helsinki. Telematics Solutions for the Finnish Railways
DaGoB Meeting Helsinki Telematics Solutions for the Finnish Railways Sirkka-Leena Holmberg Project Co-ordinator VR Ltd Finnish Railways, VR Cargo 14.8.2007 13.8.2007, Sirkka-Leena Holmberg, sivu 1 Presentation
Proposal. for the establishment of the CETC EGTC
Proposal for the establishment of the CETC EGTC Brief introduction to the CETC initiative On the 26 th May 2010, the Steering Committee of the CETC consortium in its meeting in Varaždin (Croatia) approved
3 Quality of Transport Infrastructure SCANDRIA Investment Strategy. 3.2 Integrated Concept on Optimising Rail Traffic in the Corridor
Elimination of infrastructure bottlenecks in the corridor Berlin Copenhagen/Malmö Baltic Sea Region Project #026 Scandinavian-Adriatic Corridor for Growth and Innovation Work Package Action Responsible
NETWORK INDUSTRIES TRANSPORT
NETWORK INDUSTRIES TRANSPORT The transport sector represents a key area for growth and competitiveness, not only due to its size but also to its particular function in servicing the other sectors of the
High-speed train Oslo-Berlin
High-speed train Oslo-Berlin Per Homann Jespersen 1 Introduction The COINCO-project (Corridor of Innovation and Cooperation), a collaboration between cities and regions in the Oslo-Göteborg-Malmö-Copenhagen-Berlin
BaltMet Network. Mayors of major metropolises in the Baltic Sea Region unified for the competitiveness and innovation of the Region
BaltMet Network Mayors of major metropolises in the Baltic Sea Region unified for the competitiveness and innovation of the Region Berlin Copenhagen Helsinki Malmö Oslo Riga Stockholm St.Petersburg Tallinn
Ten-T policy and the Fehmarnbelt tunnel: Impact on regional development between Øresund and Hamburg
Denne artikel er publiceret i det elektroniske tidsskrift Artikler fra Trafikdage 2014 på Aalborg Universitet (Proceedings from the Annual Transport Conference 2014 at Aalborg University) ISSN 1603-9696
The Company. Design Build Service 2014/15
The Company Design Build Service 2014/15 2 Financial Report 2014/15 Financial Report 2014/15 3 The forty-sixth financial year began on 1 April 2014 and ended on 31 March 2015. 429 buildings 1,881 (million
TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF AZERBAIJAN: OPPORTUNITIES AND PERSPECTIVES FOR GLOBAL LOGISTICS AS A BASE FOR REGIONAL INTEGRATION. INVESTMENT PROJECTS.
THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AZERBAIJAN ITALY BUSINESS FORUM TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF AZERBAIJAN: OPPORTUNITIES AND PERSPECTIVES FOR GLOBAL LOGISTICS AS A BASE FOR REGIONAL INTEGRATION.
RTF Promoting and expanding the use of Real-Time on Ferries in the South Baltic area
RTF Promoting and expanding the use of Real-Time on Ferries in the South Baltic area PROJECT SKETCH DRAFT No. 1 (03_2015) Content Page 1. BACKGROUND... 2 2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES... 3 3. COMPONENTS AND PROPOSED
Union for Mediterranean Motorways of the Sea Initiative: a way to a re-equilibrium in the Mediterranean. Transport and Urban Development Division
1 Union for Mediterranean Motorways of the Sea Initiative: a way to a re-equilibrium in the Mediterranean Transport and Urban Development Division 3 UfM MoS The concept of MoS The Motorways of the Sea
ScandFibre Logistics. Rail conquers sea? Mats Erkén Baltic Shipping Days. Oct 30th, 2012
ScandFibre Logistics Rail conquers sea? Mats Erkén Baltic Shipping Days Oct 30th, 2012 ScandFibre Logistics - Owners / Partners 20 % each 10 plants total 2 History 2000-2005 Phase 1 - Rail 99 2006-2010
Case Study. Mercadona and Renfe: Intermodal Collaboration Distribution. European Commission
Case Study Mercadona and Renfe: Intermodal Collaboration Distribution European Commission 1 THE PLATFORM If transport continues to grow at the same rate as the economy, this will become both an economic
POLAND CEE & CIS GATEWAY. www.suus.com
POLAND CEE & CIS GATEWAY www.suus.com EXPRESS ROADS & HIGHWAYS 2007 / before crisis 2013 / after crisis increase POLAND HANDLINGS IN POLISH SEAPORTS SUPPLY OF RETAIL SPACE Cushman & Wakefield, Emmerson
SURVEY ON THE TRAINING OF GENERAL CARE NURSES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. The current minimum training requirements for general care nurses
SURVEY ON THE TRAINING OF GENERAL CARE NURSES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION This survey serves as a background document for the discussion of the Commission's legislative proposal to modernize the minimum requirements
CO2 BASED MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES IN THE EU IN 2015
CO2 BASED MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES IN THE EU IN 2015 COUNTRY AT (AUSTRIA) BE (BELGIUM) BG (BULGARIA) CO2/FUEL CONSUMPTION TAXES A fuel consumption tax (Normverbrauchsabgabe or NoVA) is levied upon the first
How To Reduce Fuel Consumption
Merenkulun haasteet ja mahdollisuudet tulevassa kustannusympäristössä Staffan Herlin, Finnlines Oyj SKAL Logistiikkaseminaari 2012 1 2 Grimald Group Global Network Grimaldi Group - European Network Kapellskär
HAMBURGER HAFEN UND LOGISTIK AG. RESULTS JANUARY SEPTEMBER 2013 Analyst Conference Call, 13 November 2013
HAMBURGER HAFEN UND LOGISTIK AG RESULTS JANUARY SEPTEMBER 2013 Analyst Conference Call, 13 November 2013 1 Disclaimer The facts and information contained herein are as up to date as is reasonably possible
Espoo consultation response report
Espoo consultation response report October 2014 Transboundary environmental impact assessment of the Fehmarnbelt Fixed Link Contents Summary... 4 1 Introduction... 6 1.1 Reading guide... 8 2 Espoo Consultation...
Market Place Seminar UIC
Intermodal..:: Explore www.dbschenker.com ::.. Market Place Seminar UIC DB Schenker AG Industry Sector Intermodal Ulrich Sontheim Wien, 16.April 2013 The sales units maritime and continental care for particular
Guidelines of Rīgassatiksme an up-to-date and socially responsible company
Guidelines of Rīgassatiksme an up-to-date and socially responsible company Business activities: Supervision of united route network Passenger transportation Management of parking-lots Transport rent Trams
www.schiphollogistics.nl START OFF AT The MOST STRATEGIC LOCATION
www.schiphollogistics.nl START OFF AT The MOST STRATEGIC LOCATION IN THE NeTHERlandS The most The business park Schiphol Logistics Park (SLP) is located just five minutes from the airport apron. SLP offers
ENTERING THE EU BORDERS & VISAS THE SCHENGEN AREA OF FREE MOVEMENT. EU Schengen States. Non-Schengen EU States. Non-EU Schengen States.
ENTERING THE EU BORDERS & VISAS THE SCHENGEN AREA OF FREE MOVEMENT An area without internal borders where EU citizens and non-eu nationals may move freely EU Schengen States Non-Schengen EU States IS Azores
Railway Reform in Europe: from endangered species to sustainable systems?
Railway Reform in Europe: from endangered species to sustainable systems? International workshop on railway reform Ankara, 8 October 2009 Paul Guitink 09 July 2009 1 Content of this presentation representing
Customer Reference - International Debt Collection
Country: Hungary Company: Anda Present Industry: Wholesale www.andapresent.hu Business relationship since: January 2008 Type of debts: B2B Nature of debts: Cross-border Industry: Wholesale Anda Present,
Member Nation Report 2010 from Denmark.
Member Nation Report 2010 from Denmark. The has during the year 2010 arranged 6 member meetings including two technical site visits. The first technical site visit covered the 5.3 km long Leipzig City
DRAFT APPENDIX D MID/EASTERN CORRIDOR, RAILWAY
APPENDIX D MID/EASTERN CORRIDOR, RAILWAY Fact sheet 13 Improvement on the Scandinavian rail freight corridor Hirtshals-Hamburg Improvements for rail freight in the corridor A new intermodal terminal will
HAMBURGER HAFEN UND LOGISTIK AG
HAMBURGER HAFEN UND LOGISTIK AG Investor Presentation Commerzbank German Investment Seminar - New York City, January 2014 Berenberg Commerzbank & Goldman German Sector Conference Sachs Investment German
2015 CEF Transport Calls for Proposals COUNTRY FICHE. Germany
Millions Millions Millions 215 CEF Transport Calls for Proposals COUNTRY FICHE Key facts and figures Evaluation results Eligible vs Recommended proposals by call 47 eligible proposals were submitted in
Sustainability in the world s largest inland port duisport as central link in land-transportation between Germany and China
Sustainability in the world s largest inland port duisport as central link in land-transportation between Germany and China 4. Deutsch-Chinesische Konferenz zur Umsetzung des Aktionsplans Grüne Logistik,
HAMBURGER HAFEN UND LOGISTIK AG
HAMBURGER HAFEN UND LOGISTIK AG ANALYST CONFERENCE ON 2013 FINANCIAL YEAR RESULTS Hamburg, 27 March 2014 Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG Agenda Chairman of the Executive Board Annual Financial Statements
Value of production of agricultural products and foodstuffs, wines, aromatised wines and spirits protected by a geographical indication (GI)
Value of production of agricultural products and foodstuffs, wines, aromatised wines and spirits protected by a geographical indication (GI) TENDER N AGRI 2011 EVAL 04 Leaflet October 2012 The information
SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME. Terms of reference
SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME 3 rd Call for Proposals Terms of reference Efficient access to a SEE coordinated multimodal freight network between ports and landlocked countries
SCHMALZ+SCHÖN Eastcargo GmbH. General Company Presentation
SCHMALZ+SCHÖN Eastcargo GmbH General Company Presentation SCHMALZ+SCHÖN Seite Stand: 01.03.2010 1 East European Cargoes SERVICES PORTFOLIO Regular groupage transport services Part and complete loads Cargoes
HAMBURGER HAFEN UND LOGISTIK AG ANALYSTS CONFERENCE
HAMBURGER HAFEN UND LOGISTIK AG ANALYSTS CONFERENCE 31 MARCH 2008 Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG DISCLAIMER The facts and information contained herein are as up to date as is reasonably possible and are
Minimum Wage Protection Current German and European Debates
Årskonferanse i Fafo Østforum Fire år etter EU-utvidelsen: Status og framtidsperspektiver Oslo, 3 June 2008 Minimum Wage Protection Current German and European Debates Thorsten Schulten Wirtschafts- und
Digital Agenda Targets Progress report. Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014
Digital Agenda Targets Progress report Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014 1 NGA coverage: Fast broadband technologies capable of providing at least 30 Mbps are available to 64%, up from 54% a year ago Among
The logistics sector s view on the infrastructure in Central-Eastern European Member States Dr László Mosóczi Chairman of HUNGRAIL
The logistics sector s view on the infrastructure in Central-Eastern European Member States Dr László Mosóczi Chairman of HUNGRAIL Transport accessibility and connectivity in Central and Eastern Europe
MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE: CASE OF CENTROPE
MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE: CASE OF CENTROPE Mihály Lados C.Sc. and László Jóna PhD candidate (WHRD CRS of CERS HAS, Győr) Territorial Cohesion in Europe The 70 th anniversary of the Transdanubian Research
Mallnow Natural Gas Compressor Station. Climate-friendly gas supply
Mallnow Natural Gas Compressor Station Climate-friendly gas supply Modern Pipeline Networks The backbone of gas supply The WINGAS TRANSPORT pipeline network and the WINGAS natural gas storage facility
European Gateway Services. Paul Ham, Managing Director European Gateway Services, 6 September 2012
European Gateway Services Paul Ham, Managing Director European Gateway Services, 6 September 2012 1. Introduction ECT Europe Container Terminals (ECT) founded in 1966 3 deep sea terminals in the Port of
Case No COMP/M.4987 - IBM / COGNOS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/01/2008
EN Case No COMP/M.4987 - IBM / COGNOS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/01/2008 In electronic form on
Project to the Interreg IV B Baltic Sea Region Programme Scandinavian Adriatic Corridor for Growth and Innovation (SCANDRIA)
Kick off Meeting 3 5 September 2009 SCANDRIA Kick Off Meeting 3 5 September 2009 Berlin and Potsdam 3rd 4th 5th Venue 3rd: 4th: 5th: Plenary Open for Professional Public, Berlin Working Groups for Project
Bachelor. Think Strategy. of Engineering. Logistics Management. www.hct.ac.ae. Recognized in the UAE and Accredited in the Federal Republic of Germany
Bachelor of Engineering Logistics Think Strategy Specialisations in: Aviation Engineering and Aviation Logistics International Supply Chain Nautical Sciences Maritime Economics and Port International Transport
The sum Of Structural And Investment Funds allocated For 2014 To 2020
Business.hr (CRO business daily) WILL EUR 167 BILLION FROM EUROPEAN FUNDS RESTART SOUTHEAST EUROPE? published on 12 March 2014 Cohesion Policy: EUR 167bn from EU's structural and investment funds has been
Finnish foreign trade 2014 Figures and diagrams. 27.2.2015 FINNISH CUSTOMS Statistics 1
Finnish foreign trade 214 Figures and diagrams 27.2.215 FINNISH CUSTOMS Statistics 1 IMPORTS, EXPORTS AND TRADE BALANCE 199-214 7 billion e 6 5 4 3 2 1-1 9 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Freight Exchanges Opportunities and Challenges
Freight Exchanges Opportunities and Challenges IRU GOODS TRANSPORT COUNCIL (CTM) 07. November 2013, CH-Geneva TimoCom future of transport! 1 Agenda Short introduction referent and company Opportunities
Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Programme Announcement of the first call for proposals step 1
Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Programme Announcement of the first call for proposals step 1 12 February 2015 1. ANNOUNCEMENT The Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Programme invites public and private organisations established
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 14.5.2013 SWD(2013) 174 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European
The Software Industry in Europe
The Software Industry in Europe The Software Industry in Europe The purpose of this presentation is to: Demonstrate the importance of the European Union the world's largest single market Outline its future
ČSAD Uherské Hradiště a.s. PREZENTATION - 2014
ČSAD Uherské Hradiště a.s. PREZENTATION - 2014 www.csaduh.cz Content 1. Holding ČSAD Uherské Hradiště 2. Basic information ČSAD Uherské Hradiště a.s. 3. Main activities of freight transport division 3.1
Path to success rail freight carrier vs. integrated rail solution provider
Path to success rail freight carrier vs. integrated rail solution provider Global Rail Freight Conference Wien, 23-26. June 2014 Rail Cargo Austria AG Agenda 1. No future as a carrier in Europe 2. Rail
High Speed Rail in Poland plans & activities
High Speed Rail in Poland plans & activities UN ECE TER Project Workshop Master Plan for the future High Speed Rail network in Central and Eastern Europe Timisoara, 10 14 September 2012 Jerzy Kleniewski
usage of these types of fuels with production price far higher then diesel and petrol, is also a measure. We can say that in Bulgaria there are
TRANSPORT The basic goals of the national transport policy are focused on sustainable development of the road and railway infrastructure of national and international importance, improvement of the transport
IQ-C Action plan 2006-2008-2012 for rail freight corridor Rotterdam-Genoa
IQ-C Action plan 2006-2008-2012 for rail freight corridor Rotterdam-Genoa July 2006 (Initial Document) August 2008 (Update) The action plan has been decided upon by the Ministries of Transport from Germany,
How can UK RUC plans benefit from the Eurovignette experience?
How can UK RUC plans benefit from the Eurovignette experience? ITS United Kingdom, Road User Charging Interest Group 4th RUC IG Conference 17 February 2011, London Dr. Ludger Linnemann, AGES International
2014/2015 Greifswald. Facts and figures
2014/2015 Greifswald Facts and figures Right at the top of Germany Location Greifswald The Hanseatic and University city of Greifswald is the main administrative centre for the Western Pomerania-Greifswald
Adult Education Survey 2006, European comparison
Education 2009 Adult Education Survey 2006, European comparison Adults in the Nordic countries actively participate in education and training Persons aged 25 to 64 who live in the Nordic countries (Finland,
Consulting Transport & Logistics
Consulting Transport & Logistics Consulting Transport & Logistics Headquartered in Hannover, Germany, HaCon The service portfolio includes the requisition creates and develops high-quality software solu-
OVERVIEW OF PURCHASE AND TAX INCENTIVES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES IN THE EU
01.04.2014 OVERVIEW OF PURCHASE AND TAX INCENTIVES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES IN THE EU This table provides an overview of the incentives that are granted in the Member States of the European Union for the
CANNES 2013 12/15 MARCH 2013 GDYNIA S OFFER PRZEMYSKA BALTIC PORT OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES GDYNIA WASZYNGTONA LOGISTICS CENTRE PORT OF GDYNIA
CANNES 2013 12/15 MARCH 2013 GDYNIA S OFFER PRZEMYSKA BALTIC PORT OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES GDYNIA WASZYNGTONA LOGISTICS CENTRE PORT OF GDYNIA POMERANIAN LOGISTICS CENTRE TCZEW S OLD TOWN PLOT CASTLE HILL IN
Take the Shortcut to Central and Eastern Europe
Take the Shortcut to Central and Eastern Europe Take the Shortcut The shortest seaway between Asia and Central and South-Eastern Europe leads through the Port of Koper (Slovenia). SLOVENIA Koper Suez Karachi
INTERMODADRIA Supporting Intermodal Transport Solution in the Adriatic Area
1 INTERMODADRIA Supporting Intermodal Transport Solution in the Adriatic Area Ancona, july 2 nd 2015 Andrea Appetecchia Isfort, Ancona Port Authority Consultant 2 INTERMODADRIA: GENERAL OBJECTIVE INTERMODADRIA
Role of seaports as a link between inland and maritime transport
Role of seaports as a link between inland and maritime transport EU policy context Lieselot Marinus Policy advisor European Sea Ports Organisation UNECE Conference 17 September 2008 A few words about ESPO