NONDISCRIMINATION SAFE HARBOR ALTERNATIVES FOR 403(b) AND 401(k) PLANS
|
|
|
- Bernard Evans
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FOR ADMINISTRATOR USE ONLY. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO EMPLOYEES. NONDISCRIMINATION SAFE HARBOR ALTERNATIVES FOR 403(b) AND 401(k) PLANS Retirement plans of private employers are subject to a variety of nondiscrimination requirements intended to ensure that the plans do not unduly favor highly compensated employees (HCEs). (For 2006 plan years, non-highly compensated employees (NHCEs) are defined as employees with compensation of less than $95,000 in the 2005 plan year.) For 403(b) matching plans, the 401(m) matching test [also known as the Average Contribution Percentage (ACP) Test] is generally the nondiscrimination test that poses a problem. This test generally compares the average employer matching and employee after-tax contributions made for HCEs with the average made for NHCEs. For 401(k) plans, both the ACP and Average Deferral Percentage (ADP) tests often pose difficulties. The ADP test generally compares the average employee elective deferral contributions made by HCEs (pretax and Roth, if permitted by the plan) with the average made by NHCEs. The ADP test does not apply to elective deferrals under a 403(b) plan. Since 1999, safe harbor alternatives to the ACP and ADP tests, created by the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (SBJPA), have been available to 403(b) and 401(k) plans. Plans that meet the requirements of one of the SBJPA safe harbors are deemed to automatically meet the requirements of the ACP and ADP tests without actually having to conduct the tests. In plan years beginning after December 31, 2007, additional safe harbor alternatives to the ACP and ADP Tests created by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) will also be available to 403(b) and 401(k) matching plans that adopt automatic enrollment features for their plans. SMALL BUSINESS JOB PROTECTION ACT OF 1996 ACP AND ADP SAFE HARBORS To qualify for one of the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (SBJPA) design-based safe harbors, a plan subject to ACP and/or ADP testing must meet three basic requirements: Matching or nonelective employer contributions must conform to the requirements of one of the SBJPA safe harbor designs, Employees must be notified of their rights and obligations under the plan in a timely fashion, and A34390 (11/06)
2 SBJPA safe harbor provisions must be adopted by the first day of the plan year to which the provisions will apply. (Employers who wish to adopt the 3% nonelective safe harbor may do so as late as December of the plan year if certain additional requirements are satisfied.) If a plan meets these three basic requirements, but also allows employees to make after-tax contributions, those contributions will be subject to the ACP Test (even though pretax and employer matching contributions will not). In addition, the plan still needs to satisfy the 410(b) minimum coverage test. CONTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SBJPA SAFE HARBORS. A plan can meet the SBJPA safe harbor contribution requirements through: a basic matching contribution formula, an enhanced matching contribution formula, or a nonelective employer contribution. There can be no requirement that participants work a specified number of hours in order to receive an allocation. Regardless of which of these designs is used, matching or nonelective employer contributions made to satisfy the safe harbor must be fully vested and nonforfeitable, and must not be distributed to employees younger than unless those employees separate from service, become disabled, or die. Employer contributions must be made on the basis of a uniform nondiscriminatory definition of compensation. (See below.) Allowing employees to designate some or all of their elective deferrals to the 401(k) or 403(b) plan as Roth after-tax contributions will not make a plan ineligible for the safe harbors. But plan sponsors are not required to permit Roth contributions to qualify for the safe harbors and plan sponsors cannot require participants to make their deferrals in the form of Roth contributions. BASIC MATCHING FORMULA. Under the SBJPA safe harbors basic formula, the plan must provide an employer match for any eligible NHCE equal to 100% of elective contributions of up to 3% of compensation and 50% of elective contributions between 3% and 5% of compensation. The rate of matching contributions for HCEs cannot be higher than the matching rate for NHCEs with the same rate of elective contributions. No other NONDISCRIMINATORY DEFINITION OF COMPENSATION To qualify for the SBJPA safe harbors, employer plan contributions must be made on the basis of a uniform nondiscriminatory definition of compensation. This requirement will be satisfied if the plan bases contributions on W-2 wages, regardless of whether those wages include pre-tax employee contributions to retirement, TDA, and Section 125 cafeteria plans. But any uniform definition of compensation can be used if it passes the Compensation-Ratio Test. To conduct the Compensation-Ratio Test, Calculate the ratio of plan formula compensation to total compensation (however defined) for each employee eligible for the plan; Calculate the average compensation ratio separately for HCEs and for NHCEs. The plan definition passes the Compensation-Ratio Test if the average for the HCEs does not exceed the average for the NHCEs by more than a de minimis amount. NONDISCRIMINATION SAFE HARBOR ALTERNATIVES FOR 403(b) AND 401(k) PLANS 2
3 SAMPLE MATCHING FORMULA PLANS Institution A has a contributory retirement plan to which employees can contribute up to 10% of compensation. The institution provides a 100% match on contributions up to 3% of compensation, and a 50% match on contributions between 3 and 5%. Employee 1 contributes 2% of compensation and receives a 2% employer match. Employee 2 contributes 4% of compensation and receives a 3.5% employer match (100% of the first 3% and 50% of the remaining 1%). Employee 3 contributes 10% and receives a 4% employer match (100% of the first 3%, and 50% of the next 2%). This plan satisfies the SBJPA s Basic Matching Formula requirement. If the plan provided a 200% match on contributions up to 3% of compensation, it would still satisfy the Enhanced Matching Formula requirement. Employee 1 would receive a 4% employer match on his 2% contribution; Employee 2 would receive a 6% employer match for her 4% contribution (200% of the first 3% and 0% of the remainder); and Employee 3 would receive a 6% employer match for his 10% contribution (200% of the first 3% and 0% of the remainder). matching contributions are allowed, but additional discretionary employer contributions are permitted. (See Discretionary Employer Contributions on Page 5.) ENHANCED MATCHING FORMULA. Under the SBJPA safe harbors enhanced formula, the plan contribution formula must provide employer matching contributions for NHCEs that are at least as generous as those NHCEs would have received under the Basic Matching Formula, at any rate of elective contribution under this formula. The rate of employer matching contributions cannot increase as the rate of elective contribution increases. No employer matching contributions can be provided for elective employee contributions in excess of 6% of compensation. HCE matching contributions cannot be higher than matching contributions for NHCEs with same rate of elective contribution. (See Sample Matching Formula Plans.) NONELECTIVE CONTRIBUTION REQUIREMENT. Under the SBJPA, as an alternative to using the Basic or Enhanced Matching Formula, a plan can provide nonelective (e.g., mandatory) employer contributions of at least 3% of compensation for each eligible NHCE. If nonelective contributions are made for NHCEs, the plan can match elective employee contributions up to 6% of compensation, provided the rate of match does not increase as the rate of elective deferral increases. No HCE can have a matching rate higher than any NHCE with the same elective contribution percentage. (See Sample Nonelective Contribution Plans on Page 4.) A plan can place certain restrictions on eligible employees rights to begin or cease participation or to change their contribution rate. At a minimum, however, eligible employees must be given a window period of at least 30 days prior to the beginning of each year to make or change elections. Employers can set a cap on elective contributions, but all employees must be allowed to contribute a high enough percentage of compensation to receive the maximum amount of employer matching contributions. If desired for purposes of administrative convenience, employers can require employee contributions to be whole percentages of pay (e.g., 2% as opposed to 2.1%) or whole dollar amounts. Employers can choose to match employee contributions on either an annual or a payroll-by-payroll basis. NONDISCRIMINATION SAFE HARBOR ALTERNATIVES FOR 403(b) AND 401(k) PLANS 3
4 SAMPLE NONELECTIVE CONTRIBUTION PLANS Institution B has a contributory retirement plan. All eligible NHCEs automatically receive a 3% employer contribution whether or not they elect to make any contributions of their own. The institution provides a 100% match on all HCE and NHCE elective contributions of up to 6% of compensation. Alternatively, this plan would satisfy the nonelective contribution requirement under the SBJPA safe harbors, if HCEs also received nonelective contributions, if the employer match was not 100% or if a higher matching rate applied to lower contribution rates, provided that: (1) the nonelective contributions were provided for all eligible NHCEs, (2) no matching contributions were provided for employee contributions exceeding 6% of compensation. NOTICE REQUIREMENTS INVESTMENT ADVICE. In addition to meeting contribution requirements, SBJPA safe harbor plans must meet notice requirements in order to qualify for exemption under the safe harbors. Generally, eligible employees must be notified annually of their rights and obligations under the plan at least 30 but not more than 90 days before the start of the plan year. Employees who become eligible for the plan during any given year must receive notice no more than 90 days before their date of eligibility. The notice must describe the contribution formula (including matching, nonelective, and discretionary employer contributions), and the conditions under which the contributions are made. The notice must also describe the type and amount of compensation that employees can contribute, and the timing and procedures for signing salary reduction agreements. Vesting and withdrawal provisions must also be described. A plan can use electronic media to satisfy the safe harbor notice requirement, provided the media chosen are reasonably accessible. The electronic notice must be no less understandable than the paper documents and employees must be informed that free printed copies of the notice are available on request. The safe harbor notice can cross-reference the Summary Plan Description (SPD) for certain information, but the notice itself must include explanations of: the plan contribution formula, its vesting provisions, the administrative requirements for making employee contributions, and the name, address, phone number, and, if applicable, the address of the individuals who can provide employees with plan information. NONDISCRIMINATION SAFE HARBOR ALTERNATIVES FOR 403(b) AND 401(k) PLANS 4
5 PLAN PROVISIONS. Generally, in order to take advantage of the SBJPA safe harbors for a given plan year, plan documents should be amended before the plan year begins, and the amendments should specify the safe harbor method the plan will use. The TIAA-CREF prototype 401(k) plan, which was amended and restated to include the SBJPA requirements, includes these safe harbors. Sample amendment language is available for the specimen 403(b) plans provided by TIAA-CREF. If the nonelective employer contribution method is used to satisfy safe harbor requirements, the amendment authorizing that method s use can be adopted as late as 30 days prior to the end of the plan year. Before the plan year begins, however, employees must be notified that such an amendment may be adopted; and they must also receive supplemental notice at least 30 days before the plan year ends that the amendment has been or will be adopted. Noncontributory plans amended during a given plan year may incorporate a safe harbor employer match on elective employee contributions for the first time. This provision enables the plans to take advantage of the safe harbors in that plan year and thereafter. Plans must be amended to reflect the employer match at least three months before the end of the plan year, and they must also meet the notice and contribution requirements. OTHER NONDISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENTS. Plans that meet the requirements of the SBJPA safe harbors are exempted from the ACP and ADP Tests but must still satisfy the Minimum Coverage Test as well as the nondiscriminatoryavailability-of-benefits-rights-and-features requirements of the General Nondiscrimination Test. As a rule, plans satisfy minimum coverage requirements if the percentage of NHCEs eligible for participation is at least seven-tenths of the percentage of eligible HCEs. Plans will satisfy the nondiscriminatory-availability-of-benefitsrights-and-features requirement of General Nondiscrimination if all eligible employees are eligible for the same benefits, rights, and features of the plan. HOW TO STOP TAKING ADVANTAGE OF SBJPA SAFE HARBORS. A plan that has adopted one of the SBJPA safe harbor methods may be amended to reduce or eliminate safe harbor employer matching or nonelective contributions after the amendment becomes effective. Employees must be notified of the change at least 30 days in advance, and must also be given a reasonable opportunity to cancel or modify their salary reduction agreements. Plan documents should be amended to provide that the ACP and/or ADP Test will be performed and satisfied for the entire plan year, using the current-year testing method. Furthermore, safe harbor requirements must be satisfied for the portion of the plan year preceding the amendment s effective date. DISCRETIONARY EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS Employer matching contributions must be mandatory under the terms of the plan in order to satisfy the SBJPA safe harbor Basic or Enhanced Matching Formula requirements. Once these requirements have been met, however, the plan formula can provide for additional discretionary contributions. Employers can decide each year whether to make the additional discretionary contributions, and they are also free to determine how much they will contribute, but additional discretionary contributions cannot exceed 4% of any employee s compensation. NONDISCRIMINATION SAFE HARBOR ALTERNATIVES FOR 403(b) AND 401(k) PLANS 5
6 PENSION PROTECTION ACT OF 2006 AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT SAFE HARBORS SBJPA safe harbor plans are considered particularly suited to smaller employers. But what about the specific needs of larger employers who are seeking to increase the number of employees who participate in their plans? Automatic enrollment (which is also referred to as negative election ) may be a good compromise. Under these arrangements, all eligible employees are automatically enrolled in the plan at a specified contribution rate and with contributions going into a default investment option selected by the plan sponsor. An employee can subsequently make an election to not participate, to contribute a different percentage of compensation to the plan and/or to transfer funds or change future contribution allocations from the default option to other investment options offered under the plan. Typically, automatic enrollment requires employees to have a predetermined percentage of their pay, usually 3%, deferred as soon as they become eligible for the plan, unless the employees affirmatively elect otherwise. Employers who are adding an automatic enrollment feature to an existing plan often apply the automatic enrollment policy only to new hires. Most automatic enrollment plans are used by employers who have experienced difficulty passing the ACP and/or ADP tests. Although automatic enrollment can often increase employee participation, it does not guarantee passing the ACP and ADP tests. But thanks to the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA), starting in 2008, optional new safe harbors will ensure that qualifying automatic enrollment plans do satisfy the ACP and ADP test requirements. SAFE HARBOR INCENTIVE FOR QUALIFYING AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT PLANS. Automatic enrollment plans that satisfy new safe harbor requirements established by the PPA are exempt from certain nondiscrimination requirements: Contributory 403(b) plans with automatic enrollment that satisfy PPA safe harbor requirements will be deemed to satisfy Average Contribution Percentage (ACP) Test requirements automatically without testing. 401(k) plans with automatic enrollment that satisfy the PPA safe harbor requirements will be deemed to satisfy Average Deferral Percentage (ADP), ACP, and Top-Heavy requirements without testing. These new safe harbors are in addition to the SBJPA Design-Based Safe Harbor alternatives to the ADP and ACP Tests described above. To qualify for the PPA safe harbors, automatic enrollment plans must provide an annual notice to employees providing information about the automatic enrollment provisions and about participants right to opt out of participation or to change their deferral percentage and/or investment allocations. And the plans will still need to satisfy the other nondiscrimination requirements as discussed under the SBJPA safe harbors on Page 5. DEFAULT EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION RATE. To qualify for the PPA safe harbors, the default automatic employee contribution rate, which will apply unless an employee opts out of participation or signs a voluntary salary reduction agreement with another contribution rate, must: be at least 3% in the first year of automatic participation, 4% in the second year, 5% in the third year and 6% in the fourth and subsequent years, but never exceed 10%. NONDISCRIMINATION SAFE HARBOR ALTERNATIVES FOR 403(b) AND 401(k) PLANS 6
7 REQUIRED EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS. To qualify for a PPA safe harbor, an automatic enrollment plan must also meet one of the following requirements: Provide a nonelective employer contribution of at least 3% for all eligible NHCEs regardless of whether they have changed their contribution percentage or even if they have elected not to make any employee contributions at all. (If nonelective employer contributions are made for NHCEs, they can also be provided to HCEs.) Provide an employer match for all NHCEs equal to at least 100% for contributions of up to 1% of compensation and 50% for contributions between 1% and 6%. No match can be provided for employee contributions in excess of 6% of compensation and the employer matching percentage cannot be higher for any employee than for another employee with the same or a lower contribution percentage. (If matching contributions are provided for NHCEs, they can also be provided for HCEs.) Unlike the SBJPA safe harbors, the PPA safe harbors do not require immediate 100% vesting for all employer contributions But all employer contributions in a PPA enrollment safe harbor plan must be 100% vested within two years of automatic enrollment. C36941 A34390 (11/06)
Detailed information on safe harbor contributions to 401(k) plans
Retirement Plan Services Detailed information on safe harbor contributions to 401(k) plans Safe harbor brief explanation: A plan sponsor may elect to contribute safe harbor minimum contributions to a 401(k)
ftwilliam.com Safe Harbor Basics 10/28/2015
ftwilliam.com Safe Harbor Basics 10/28/2015 Agenda ADP safe harbor requirements ACP safe harbor requirements Top Heavy safe harbor plans Reducing or suspending safe harbor contributions for the current
403(b) Plan Fundamentals:
403(b) Plan Fundamentals: Your guide to compliance For Institutional Investor Use Only. Not for Use With or Distribution to the Public. How TIAA-CREF helps Our comprehensive suite of fiduciary and compliance
NONDISCRIMINATION TESTING
ADVANTEDGE UNDERSTANDING NONDISCRIMINATION TESTING NONDISCRIMINATION TESTING Nondiscrimination testing is the process of identifying when benefit limits are exceeded. Essentially, nondiscrimination regulations
The MC Academy The Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Series. Qualified Plans Part 2
The MC Academy The Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Series Qualified Plans Part 2 June 4, 2013 Nondiscrimination Nondiscrimination in General Qualified Retirement Plans may not Impermissibly
My recordkeeper takes care of the plan s nondiscrimination. Nondiscriminatory Matching Contributions: More Than Simply ACP Testing. article Retirement
article Retirement Nondiscriminatory Matching Contributions: More Than Simply ACP Testing Actual contribution percentage (ACP) testing is only one part of nondiscrimination testing of matching contributions,
Employee Benefit Plans Nondiscrimination Compliance Testing Practice Aid
Employee Benefit Plans Nondiscrimination Compliance Testing Practice Aid This ing practice aid is a matrix designed to assist auditors in determining which types of compliance ing is required for which
Plan Sponsor 401(k) Retirement Plan Analysis
Plan Sponsor 401(k) Retirement Plan Analysis Table of Contents: 3 Controlled Groups & Affiliated Service Groups 4 Plan Design Alternatives 5 401(k) Testing Requirements 6 ADP & ACP Testing 7 Top Heavy
What s the Easiest Way to Pass a 401(k) NONDISCRIMINATION TEST? TRANSAMERICA. The retirement answer.
What s the Easiest Way to Pass a 401(k) NONDISCRIMINATION TEST? TRANSAMERICA. The retirement answer. Skip it with SAFE HARBOR contributions. It s true. A company can forego 401(k) nondiscrimination tests
401(k) Plans for Business Owners
401(k) Plans for Business Owners Flexible options for companies of all sizes Because large corporations spearheaded the growth of 401(k) plans, many closely held business owners assume this type of plan
Average Deferral Percentage test (ADP test) All other employees are considered Non-HCEs.
PART 2 Compliance Testing THE BASICS Your 401(k) plan must be examined regularly to confirm that it is in compliance with the tax code and ERISA regulations. The primary purpose of this compliance testing
401(k) Plan Executive Summary
401(k) Plan Executive Summary January 2016 3000 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 130 Roseville, CA 95661 Tel 916.773.3480 Fax 916.773.3484 6400 Canoga Avenue, Suite 250 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Tel 818.716.0111
Retirement Services Instructional Guide
Retirement Services Instructional Guide Index of Content Click the topic you want to learn more about! Introduction to Your Quarterly Package Paychex Retirement Services for Employers Website Employee
INSTRUCTIONS FOR 403(b) PROTOTYPE PLAN AND COMPLETION OF 403(b) ADOPTION AGREEMENTS
INSTRUCTIONS FOR 403(b) PROTOTYPE PLAN AND COMPLETION OF 403(b) ADOPTION AGREEMENTS The 403(b) Prototype Plan authorizes elections, either by adoption agreement selection or by other action. Each election
SARSEP Salary Reduction Simplified Employee Pension
Internal Revenue Service Tax Exempt and Government Entities Employee Plans SARSEP Salary Reduction Simplified Employee Pension for Small Businesses Table of Contents What is a SARSEP?...1 Choosing a SARSEP....1
Plan sponsors are interested in ADP/ACP safe harbor
Nondiscrimination Testing How Safe Is Your ADP/ACP Safe Harbor? Plan sponsors are interested in actual deferral percentage (ADP) and actual contribution percentage (ACP) safe harbor designs primarily because
Small Business Plans Business owner guide
Small Business Plans Business owner guide Contents 1 Why Consider a Retirement Plan? 2 SEP Plan 4 SIMPLE IRA 6 Age-Weighted Profit Sharing Plan 8 New Comparability Profit Sharing Plan 10 Safe Harbor 401(k)
Plan Design Report TABLE OF CONTENTS
Plan Design Report Disclaimer: Employee Fiduciary is providing this report for projection purposes only. The plan design illustrations contained with this report are not based on legal plan documents nor
Employer Frequently Asked Questions
Employer Frequently Asked Questions Contributions How much can a participant defer? The IRS limits the amount a participant can defer in a given calendar year. This is the 402(g) limit which is an indexed
NONDISCRIMINATION TESTING
Presents NONDISCRIMINATION TESTING TRAPS FOR THE UNWARY Felicia A. Finston [email protected] Purpose of Nondiscrimination Testing Ensure plan does not discriminate in favor of highly compensated
Testing 101: Understanding Compliance Testing. Susan M. Wright, CPA, APM, Director of Compliance & Consulting Jason Frey, QPA, Consultant
Testing 101: Understanding Compliance Testing Susan M. Wright, CPA, APM, Director of Compliance & Consulting Jason Frey, QPA, Consultant Topics of Discussion The Annual Information Form The importance
IRS Issues Final 401(k) and 401(m) Regulations
Important Information Plan Administration/Operation March 2005 IRS Issues Final 401(k) and 401(m) Regulations WHO'S AFFECTED These rules affect 401(k) plans. They also affect other types of defined contribution
How to Correct ADP/ACP Test Failures after the Statutory Correction Period
How to Correct ADP/ACP Test Failures after the Statutory Correction Period This white paper is written for 401(a) defined contribution plans that offer the Internal Revenue Code ( IRC ) 401(k) and/or 401(m)
This Checklist is not a complete description of all plan requirements, and should not be used as a substitute for a complete plan review
401(k) Plan Checklist This Checklist is not a complete description of all plan requirements, and should not be used as a substitute for a complete plan review For Business Owner s Use DO NOT SEND THIS
A Primer on 401(k) Plan Design Alternatives
A Primer on 401(k) Plan Design Alternatives Prepared by: Plan Design Consultants, Inc. 1810 Gateway Drive, Ste 300 San Mateo, CA 94404 (650) 341-3322 [email protected] [email protected]
If your plan has not been updated to reflect EGTRRA, the plan needs to be revised.
1) Has your plan document been updated within the past few years to reflect recent law changes? If your plan has not been updated to reflect EGTRRA, the plan needs to be revised. Laws related to retirement
Planning for Retirement Needs. Profit-Sharing Plans, 401(k) Plans, Stock Bonus Plans, and ESOPs Chapter 5
Planning for Retirement Needs Profit-Sharing Plans, 401(k) Plans, Stock Bonus Plans, and ESOPs Chapter 5 Chapter 5: Profit Sharing Profit sharing 401(k) Stock bonus ESOP Why Profit Sharing? Discretionary
Mandatory Disaggregation Permissive Disaggregation Otherwise Excludable Employees Consequences of Using Disaggregation. How Disaggregation Works
410(b) Disaggregation Tips and Pitfalls Kimberly B. Martin, APA, CPC, QPA Education Director, NIPA Kim Martin, APA, CPC, QPA Director of Education, NIPA, Case Manager, Pension Plan Professionals, Inc.
401(k) Boot Camp Part 2 Getting Money Into the Plan
401(k) Boot Camp Part 2 Getting Money Into the Plan November 12, 2014 Presenter: Nancy J. Manary, Director Benefits Consulting Verisight, Inc. 401(k) Boot Camp Part 2 Part 1 Getting People Into the Plan
Qualified Retirement Plan
Qualified Retirement Plan SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION 150838 02/13 This page intentionally left blank. Qualified Retirement Plan and Trust Summary Plan Description TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... iii DEFINITIONS...
SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION
Qualified Retirement Plan SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION 150838 Rev. 11/08 Qualified Retirement Plan and Trust Summary Plan Description TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...iii DEFINITIONS...1 Beneficiary...1 Catch-up
401(k) PROFIT SHARING SOLUTIONS
401(k) PROFIT SHARING SOLUTIONS Most small business owners are concerned about retirement, both for themselves and for their employees. The question isn t whether to implement a retirement plan. The two
Section 401(k) and(m)-adp/acp Tests-Correction Methods under EPCRS CPE 2013
Section 401(k) and(m)-adp/acp Tests-Correction Methods under EPCRS CPE 2013 By: Felecia Poree and Al Reich Reviewers: Susan Tarrant, Marty Friedlander, Bonnie Schaumberg and Mitch Waters Overview INTERNAL
Business Retirement Plans Choose Wisely
Business Retirement Plans Choose Wisely Business Retirement Plans BNY Mellon Retirement is here to help you craft the bold solutions that help deliver successful retirement outcomes. Americans are expected
401(k) Plan Administration: Fiduciary Responsibility and The Impact of Changes to Your Plan
401(k) Plan Administration: Fiduciary Responsibility and The Impact of Changes to Your Plan Presented by: Kirsten L. Vignec Shareholder Hill Ward Henderson Introduction Our discussion today focuses on
CORRECTION METHODS FOR 401(k) FAILURES. Avaneesh Bhagat, Group Manager Sherri Morris, Tax Law Specialist Employee Plans Voluntary Compliance
CORRECTION METHODS FOR 401(k) FAILURES Avaneesh Bhagat, Group Manager Sherri Morris, Tax Law Specialist Employee Plans Voluntary Compliance TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW....... 3 EMPLOYER ELIGIBILITY FAILURE.......
GIVE YOUR 401(k) PLAN A BOOST
GIVE YOUR 401(k) PLAN A BOOST By: Charles M. Lax, Esq. I. THE BASICS A. Traditional 401k Plan 1. Features a. Employees are permitted to make pre-tax contributions b. The maximum deferral permitted in 2016
Internal Revenue Service Enrolled Retirement Plan Agent Special Enrollment Examination (ERPA-SEE) Syllabus. Part I: Compliance and Operational Issues
Internal Revenue Service Enrolled Retirement Plan Agent Special Enrollment Examination (ERPA-SEE) Syllabus Part I: Compliance and Operational Issues I. General Description The syllabus for Part I of the
A Primer on the New Proposed 401(k) Regulations and Final Catch-Up Contribution Regulations. Client Teleconference October 23, 2003
A Primer on the New Proposed 401(k) Regulations and Final Catch-Up Contribution Regulations Client Teleconference October 23, 2003 Presented by: Howard Clemons Kurt Lawson Keith Kost Christopher Crouch
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
Compensation By: Ed Mitte, John Old, and Sarah Rumsey Reviewers: Al Reich and Mitch Waters Overview INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES Introduction Compensation is used for many
ST. JOHN S UNIVERSITY DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLAN (JANUARY 1, 2015 RESTATEMENT)
ST. JOHN S UNIVERSITY DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLAN (JANUARY 1, 2015 RESTATEMENT) INTRODUCTION This document is both the formal document that constitutes the St. John s University Defined Contribution
Retirement Plan Administration. Mercer HR Services. SERVICE 401(k) Compliance Testing Manual. A resource for testing information
Retirement Plan Administration Mercer HR Services FULL 401(k) SERVICE 401(k) Compliance Testing Manual A resource for testing information Copyright 2005 by Mercer HR Services. All contents are the confidential
New Comparability Plan
Raymond James John Dulay Financial Advisor 550 W. Washington Blvd. Suite 1050 Chicago, IL 60661 312-869-3889 888-711-4301 [email protected] www.truenorthretirementpartners.com New Comparability
Qualified Retirement Plan and Trust Defined Contribution Basic Plan Document 03
Qualified Retirement Plan and Trust Defined Contribution Basic Plan Document 03 PO Box 2760 Omaha, NE 68103-2760 Fax: 866-468-6268 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS.... 5 2009 RMD.... 5 ACP Test Safe Harbor
Safe Harbor 401(k) Plan Errors and Corrections. Agenda. Presented by: Robert Richter, APM and Bob Kaplan, CPC, QPA
Safe Harbor 401(k) Plan Errors and Corrections Presented by: Robert Richter, APM and Bob Kaplan, CPC, QPA Agenda 1. Document Failures 2. Notice Failures 3. Missed Deferral Opportunity 4. Funding with Forfeitures
YOUR COMPANY 401(k) PLAN
YOUR COMPANY 401(k) PLAN Paychex... Your Essential Partner We are pleased to offer this brochure as an overview to your company-sponsored 401(k) plan. The following pages outline your roles and responsibilities
New law provides additional designated Roth contribution options
Important information Plan design October 2010 New law provides additional designated Roth contribution options Who s affected This information applies to sponsors of and participants in 401(k) plans,
PEO and Multiple Employer Plans
PEO and Multiple Employer Plans by: Alan Moore, CFO Slavic Investment Group Retirement Plans A retirement plan is a written document defining benefits provided by the employer on a nondiscriminating basis
Retirement Plan Choices and Design Options
Richard A. Naegele Attorney at Law Fellow, American College of Employee Benefits Counsel 35765 Chester Road Avon, OH 44011-1262 Main: (440) 695-8000 Direct: (440) 695-8074 Fax: (440) 695-8098 Email: [email protected]
Comparison of SEPS, SARSEPs and SIMPLE IRA Plans
General Comments Applicable Code Sections Employer sets up IRAs for eligible employees and makes contributions to the IRAs. Amount of the contributions can be discretionary. 408(k) Generally, IRAs (set
Alerus Retirement Solutions Plan Administration Guide
Alerus Retirement Solutions Plan Administration Guide Introduction This guide provides a summary of procedures, documents, compliance testing, and government reporting related to qualified plans that will
401(k) Plans Auto-Enroll, Auto-Escalate What and How You Can Do It!
401(k) Plans Auto-Enroll, Auto-Escalate What and How You Can Do It! Employee Benefits Symposium Rosewood Hall, SoHo Birmingham, Alabama August 22, 2013 Donna Cornwell, O Neal Steel B. David Joffe, Bradley
403(b) vs. 401(k) Plan Design Considerations for Tax-Exempt Organizations Tuesday, April 30, 2013
403(b) vs. 401(k) Plan Design Considerations for Tax-Exempt Organizations Tuesday, April 30, 2013 Rod Stortenbecker, CPC, QPA, FLMI Senior Consultant, Lincoln Financial Group Plan design options for tax-exempt
Legal Alert: Pension Protection Act of 2006 Changes Affecting Defined Contribution Plans
Legal Alert: Pension Protection Act of 2006 Changes Affecting Defined Contribution Plans August 16, 2006 A little more than half of the 907 pages of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 deal with pension
Glossary of Qualified
Glossary of Qualified Retirement Plan Terms 401(k) Plan: A qualified profit sharing or stock bonus plan under which plan participants have an option to put money into the plan or receive the same amount
WRITTEN TESTIMONY FOR THE RECORD OF JEFFREY A. PORTER, CPA ON BEHALF OF THE
WRITTEN TESTIMONY FOR THE RECORD OF JEFFREY A. PORTER, CPA ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1455 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1081 COMMITTEE ON SMALL
COMPARING 403(b) AND QUALIFIED PLANS
PensionPrimer COMPARING 403(b) AND QUALIFIED PLANS A Topic of Interest to Retirement Plan Administrators Perhaps the most important decision that an institution will need to make when establishing a retirement
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ADVISORY May 2001 Required GUST Amendments for Qualified Retirement Plans The deadline for adopting GUST amendments to qualified retirement plans and submitting
FAQs REGARDING DESIGNATED ROTH ACCOUNTS
FAQs REGARDING DESIGNATED ROTH ACCOUNTS These frequently asked questions and answers are provided for general information only and should not be cited as any type of legal authority. They are designed
Earning for Today and Saving for Tomorrow. Retirement Savings Plan 401(k) inspiring possibilities
Earning for Today and Saving for Tomorrow Retirement Savings Plan 401(k) inspiring possibilities Retirement Savings Plan 401(k) Advocate Health Care Network offers the Advocate Health Care Network Retirement
IRS Issues Proposed Rules and Sample Notice Regarding Automatic Enrollment Arrangements
December 2007 / Issue 56 A legal update from Dechert s Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group IRS Issues Proposed Rules and Sample Notice Regarding Automatic Enrollment Arrangements d The Internal
Benefits Practice Resource Center
Benefits Practice Resource Center Reproduced with permission from Benefit Practitioners Strategy Guide, BPRC,, 06/08/2015. Copyright 2015 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Excel Finance Co. 401(k) Plan
Excel Finance Co. 401(k) Plan Summary Plan Description The Summary Plan Description (SPD) which follows is a technical document that meets the legal requirements of the Department of Labor and Internal
Synopsis of Qualified Retirement Plan Options
Synopsis of Qualified Retirement Plan Options 401(k) Salary Deferral Only No contribution cost for employer Subject to ADP non- discrimination test under 401(k) o Failure of test means highly compensated
TYPES OF QUALIFIED PLANS
by Richard A. Naegele, J.D., M.A. Wickens, Herzer, Panza, Cook & Batista Co. 35765 Chester Road Avon, OH 44011-1262 Phone: (440) 695-8074 Email: [email protected] Website: www.wickenslaw.com 1114200.pptx
Roth 401(k) Amendment to the UBS Prototype 401(k) Plan
ab Roth 401(k) Amendment to the UBS Prototype 401(k) Plan Steps to Adopt the Discretionary Roth 401(k) Amendment to the UBS Prototype 401(k) Plan Employers may offer a Roth (i.e., after-tax) contribution
What s the Easiest Way to Pass a 401(k) NONDISCRIMINATION TEST? Transamerica. Master Retirement. POWER CHOICE FREEDOM
What s the Easiest Way to Pass a 401(k) NONDISCRIMINATION TEST? Transamerica. Master Retirement. POWER CHOICE FREEDOM Skip it with SAFE HARBOR contributions. It s true. A company can forego 401(k) nondiscrimination
IRS Nondiscrimination Proposal Limits QSERPs, Adds Cross-Testing Option and New Closed Plan Relief
IRS Nondiscrimination Proposal Limits QSERPs, Adds Cross-Testing Option and New Closed Plan Relief Proposed IRS regulations would tighten some of the nondiscrimination options that had allowed for flexible
G Employee Benefits Alert
G Employee Benefits Alert August 2001 The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (the Act ) ushers in the most significant
401(k) Summary Plan Description
401(k) Summary Plan Description WELLSPAN 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION I I PRIOR TO II III I TABLE OF TO YOUR PLAN What kind of Plan is this? 5 What information does this Summary
Client Memorandum. What You Need to Know About the Final 401(k) and 401(m) Regulations By: Ann M. Kim, Carol Hines Wacaser and David Wolfe
Client Memorandum HR Law/Employee Benefits March 2005 What You Need to Know About the Final 401(k) and 401(m) Regulations By: Ann M. Kim, Carol Hines Wacaser and David Wolfe In August 2003, we distributed
October 28, 2015. Copyright 2015 by Richard A. Naegele, J.D., M.A. Copyright 2015 by Richard A. Naegele, J.D., M.A.
by Richard A. Naegele, J.D., M.A. Wickens, Herzer, Panza, Cook & Batista Co. 35765 Chester Road Avon, OH 44011-1262 Phone: (440) 695-8074 Email: [email protected] Web: www.wickenslaw.com 1217192.pptx
SAVINGS INCENTIVE MATCH PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES BASIC PLAN DOCUMENT
Customer copy please retain for your records. SAVINGS INCENTIVE MATCH PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES BASIC PLAN DOCUMENT DEFINITIONS ADOPTING EMPLOYER Means any corporation, sole proprietor or other entity named in
A Lesson in Qualified Retirement Plans
A Lesson in Qualified Retirement Plans Since salary alone is often not enough to attract and retain valued employees, how can your business use a qualified retirement plan to enhance its employee benefits
Guide to Small Business Retirement Plans
Guide to Small Business Retirement Plans ADVANCED MARKETS All guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims paying ability of the issuing insurance company. Annuities issued by Transamerica
