otice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right

Transcription

1 otice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right I, John: of the Wilson family, hereby known as John: Wilson, a flesh and blood sovereign human being created by God, a living soul, do hereby make Oath and state the following is My Truth and My Law: 01. Whereas it is my understanding that the Commonwealth of Australia is a Common Law Jurisdiction where the People have Sovereignty, which is the ultimate authority to make and impose Laws, and, 02. Whereas it is my understanding that all Law hangs on loving God and loving one s neighbour as oneself, and, 03. Whereas it is my understanding that the Rule of Law, which is defined, in the Oxford Reference, A Dictionary of Law, Oxford University Press, as: 1. The supremacy of law. 2. A feature attributed to the UK constitution by Professor Dicey (Law of the Constitution, 1885). It embodied three concepts: the absolute predominance of regular law, so that the government has no arbitrary authority over the citizen; the equal subjection of all (including officials) to the ordinary law administered by the ordinary courts; and the fact that the citizen s personal freedoms are formulated and protected by the ordinary law rather than by abstract constitutional declarations., prevails throughout the Commonwealth of Australia, and, 04. Whereas it is my understanding that I, John: Wilson, am a Freeman-on-the-Land with Liberty in Christ Jesus, and, 05. Whereas it is my understanding that it is unequivocal in logic that each individual human holds the inalienable right to completely own and manage their body, and that each common error variously made by all people demonstrates that the successful management of one's own body, including its mind's decisions, is more than a full time job, and 06. Whereas it is my understanding that the common government assumption that its personnel can successfully manage their own bodies AND the bodies of other people illuminates the corruption 1

2 and unmatched ignorance of government personnel, especially prosecutors and judges, and the countless government inferior laws effecting that claimed authority again demonstrate that the greatest threat to human rights is always from one's own government, and 07. Whereas it is my understanding that the last peaceful defence of our liberties against incessant government grabs for more power is the 12 person Jury, and 08. Whereas it is my understanding that, in the Commonwealth and the States of Australia, prosecutors and judges are common people who hold no more intelligence or reasoning ability than any other common person, and often less because of their egos and insatiable craving for more power, and 09. Whereas it is my understanding that the duty and design of the citizen Jury is to apply reasoning without title-induced ego and craving for power of office. Lawyers and judges literally cannot understand that concept even if they read these words, which is why wise people instituted the citizen jury system with its authority over lawyers and judges, and 10. Whereas it is my understanding that the citizen understanding of jury nullification in the Australia has become critically important with the increasing fear-based laws supported by the Liberal/Labor Party, its politically appointed prosecutors, judges, and the United Nations leadership, and 11. Whereas it is my understanding that Jury nullification of inferior laws, which are based on the government's assumed ownership of one s body, is the highest duty of a Jury. Jury defence of the superior laws protecting one s absolute ownership and management of one s own body, and thus all our rights, requires that the Juror s understand their authority to judge the law and its application, and 12. Whereas it is my understanding, as a Freeman-on-the-Land, that no Freeman shall be taken indeed imprisoned, either dispossessed, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, nor shall anyone enter upon his property, except by means of the legal judgment of a Jury of twelve of his Equals which Law of the Land, and, 13. Whereas it is my understanding that to no one will Right or Justice be sold, nor denied, nor delayed, and, 2

3 14. Whereas it is my understanding that any grants or promises of fines and forfeitures affecting any Freeman before conviction are illegal and void, and, 15. Whereas it is my understanding that I have certain God-given and inalienable Rights including the Rights to Life, Liberty, Property, and the Pursuit of Happiness, and, 16. Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and, 17. Whereas it is my understanding that I have the inalienable Common Law Right to Trial by Jury in any action and in any court, and, 18. Whereas it is my understanding that, because a Freeman-on-the- Land can only be lawfully arrested indeed imprisoned as a result of the Judgment of a Jury, any other arrest indeed imprisoning, for example: by the Police or Sheriffs, of a Freeman-on-the-Land is unlawful, including arrest by way of an Arrest Warrant at the direction of a Judge or Magistrate, who also have no Jurisdiction over a Freeman-on-the-Land, and 19. Whereas it is my understanding that, when a Freeman-on-the-Land is arrested indeed imprisoned by the Police or Sheriffs, the Freeman-on-the-Land must be freed immediately, and 20. Whereas it is my understanding that, if the freeman-on-the-land is not freed immediately, a Writ of Habeas Corpus mandates that the Freeman-on-the-Land is urgently brought to the nearest Court to be tried by a Jury for the alleged offence, for which he has been arrested indeed imprisoned, to determine his guilt or innocence, and 21. Whereas it is my understanding that, if the detained Freeman-onthe-Land cannot be immediately tried by a Jury, then he must be set free, and 22. Whereas it is my understanding that, should a Judge or a Magistrate decide to persist with an accusation charging the Freeman-on-the-Land with an offence to appear before a Jury at some later date, the Judge or Magistrate may enter into a contract (known as Bail ) with the Freeman-on-the-Land that binds the Freeman-on-the-Land to appear on an appointed date in a Court for a Jury to judge him, and 3

4 23. Whereas it is my understanding that the terms of that contract (known as Bail ) are not to be unreasonable nor oppressive, and 24. Whereas it is my understanding that everyone is presumed to be innocent until proved to be guilty, and 25. Whereas it is my understanding that everyone is entitled to enjoy the protection the Courts, which are places where Justice is administered, and 26. Whereas it is my understanding that Justice is the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs, and 27. Whereas it is my understanding that, should a Jury find the Freeman-on-the-Land not guilty, then the Freeman-on-the-Land is entitled to claim Damages for the wrongful arrest indeed imprisonment and the deprivation of his Liberty, and 28. Whereas it is my understanding that a Common Law Right to travel on the highways without a license, provided one is not engaged in commerce, thereupon is lawful and still exists although it does appear to have been deceptively hidden, and, 29. Whereas it is my understanding that I have a Right to use my Property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and, 30. Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and, 31. Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and, 32. Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and, 33. Whereas it is my understanding that the executive power of the Commonwealth of Australia was vested in the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, according to section 61 of the 1900 United Kingdom's Act of Parliament having the title of "the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act", and, 34. Whereas it is my understanding that for a statute in Australia to be given the force of law must be granted "Royal Assent" either directly from the Crown or from her representative, being a 4

5 Governor-General or a State Governor, who she appoints in an Order from the Privy Council, and, 35. Whereas it is my understanding that there are no Orders from the Privy Council for the appointments of Governors-General nor State Governors thereby rendering those so-called Governors-General and State Governors to be impostors, and, 36. Whereas it is my understanding that no Acts of Parliament in Australia, which would be held to be Statute Law, have been duly enacted from the time of the signing of the Treaty of Versailles by the then prime minister of Australia, Mr. William ("Billy") Hughes, in 1919, and, 37. Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and, 38. Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in the Commonwealth and the States of Australia is a representative one, and, 39. Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and, 40. Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and, 41. Whereas it is my understanding that People in the Commonwealth and the States of Australia have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and, 42. Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and, 43. Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and, 44. Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace, and, 45. Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and, 5

6 46. Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and, 47. Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and, 48. Whereas it is my understanding that I have a Right to use my Property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and, 49. Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by the Commonwealth or the States of Australia or any of its agencies creates no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and, 50. Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and, 51. Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and, 52. Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, John: Wilson, a Freeman-on-the-Land, do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter. 53. Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom. 54. Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right. 55. Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure. 56. Furthermore, I claim that the courts in the Commonwealth and the 6

7 States of Australia are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services. 57. Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for, as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land, I am not subject to any Act of Parliament. 58. Furthermore, I claim my Fee, as Damages, for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is two hundred and fifty dollars per hour or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and two thousand dollars per hour or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent. 59. Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned Fee against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way. 60. Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms. 61. Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both. 62. Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on videotape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit. 63. Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within Fourteen (14) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability 7

8 and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than fourteen days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service. 64. Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against myself, a Freeman-on-the- Land, John: Wilson. Place of Claim of Right:.. Dated:. Claimant: John: Wilson. Notary Public: 8