A Review of the Legal Research and Legal Topics Presented at SIOP
|
|
- Adela Allison
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A Review of the Legal Research and Legal Topics Presented at SIOP Elizabeth McChrystal Florida Institute of Technology Editor s Note: In order to highlight aspects of the conference in this issue of TIP, Elizabeth McChrystal agreed to provide an overview of the presentations on legal topics. Legal issues were a predominant theme at the 20th Annual SIOP Conference. Of the 16 legal issue topics presented, 6 were poster presentations, 4 were symposiums, 2 were master tutorials, 2 were panel discussions, 1 was a practitioner forum, and 1 was a preconference workshop. A broad spectrum of topics was covered. Although scheduling conflicts prevented me from attending each event, provided is a general overview of the legal issues presented. Greater focus will be placed on the sessions I attended or about which I was able to collect information. The review of the legal issues presented at SIOP is organized in the following fashion. First, major issues and overview of EEO law are provided. In this section, legal presentations that covered more than one legal topic are discussed. Second, other sessions that focused on a single legal issue are discussed. Third, a popular topic with the most sessions and/or presentations is discussed. Finally, the review concludes with a short discussion on continued research in the area and questions to be addressed. Major Issues and Overview of the EEO Law As one might expect, several presenters provided a thorough overview of the laws that govern workplace affairs. Donald Zink (2005a) reviewed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I of the Americans with Disability Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Family Medical Leave Act in his master tutorial. For each law, he identified the legal definition, protected classes, covered entities, administrative procedures, prohibited practices, and remedies for mistreatment. For instance, in review of Title VII, he defines Title VII as prohibition against discrimination by employment agencies and labor organizations on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The EEOC administrative procedure for filing a claim was also discussed along with the type of claims that can be filed under Title VII such as disparate treatment, adverse impact, sexual harassment, pattern or practice claims, and mixed motive claims. Finally, remedies such as equitable relief and capped legal relief were thoroughly discussed (Zink, 2005a). Frank Landy chaired a symposium on the trends and major issues in employment litigation discrimination (Landy, 2005a). In this symposium, Donald Zink (2005b) provided an overview of discrimination filings with an The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 151
2 emphasis on sexual harassment discrimination filings. Zink provided evidence of an upward trend for complaints filed from 1992 to He suggested the trend results from increased awareness towards sexual harassment, evolution of sexual harassment law, and an increased number of minorities and women in the workplace (Zink, 2005b). Margaret Stockdale (2005) provided an overview of disparate treatment because of sex, reviewed the bona fide occupational qualification for sex, and discussed sex stereotyping issues in sex discrimination claims. James Outtz (2005) focused on race discrimination in the workplace. He discussed trends in race discrimination, types of race discrimination, remedies for the wrongful acts, and concluded with advice for both the applicant and employees on how to defend against racial discrimination. Arthur Gutman (2005a) focused on Internet recruitment and selection. Specifically, he reviewed the differences between adverse impact and pattern or practice and the EEOC new definition for an applicant. Next, he discussed Internet applicants, traditional applicant settings and the potential for affirmative action, adverse impact, and pattern or practice claims. Based on these examples, he concluded with recommendations for recruiting and selection (Gutman, 2005a). The concept of the Internet applicant was further explored in a panel discussion chaired by Douglas Reynolds (Reynolds, Campion, Jayne, Miaskioff, & McPhail, 2005). A preconference workshop, held by Frank Landy and David Copus (2005), covered a wide array of legal topics. Specifically, the workshop provided a review of recent federal court cases associated with protected classes, discussed statistical issues with setting cut scores, reviewed federal judges perspectives of I-O psychology and expert testimony, and covered lawyer challenges to the Daubert Principle in the admissibility of expert testimony. Frank Landy also chaired a symposium on expert testimony (Landy, 2005b). In this symposium, George Thornton III (2005) discussed the judicial guidelines for expert qualification in court cases and the admissibility of expert and scientific evidence. Specifically, he discussed the Daubert Principles. In terms of admissibility of evidence, he explained the importance of I-O experts presenting relevant and reliable information to the courts. In addition, he discussed the increased scrutiny I-O experts are exposed to by the opponent s attorney. He concluded with recommendations for I-O psychologists who would like to become or are expert witnesses. Based on interviews with 11 judges, Landy (2005c) discussed expert testimony from the judges perspective. The main issues that emerged were the Daubert Principles, process for expert selection, what constitutes a compelling testimony, and positive and negative characteristics of an expert witness. David Copus (2005) discussed social science testimony in court cases. Specifically, he discussed the concept of junk science, which is the admissibility of expert testimony in court cases. He discussed possible reasons for exclusion of expert testimony from his perspective as a lawyer in employment discrimination claims. Honorable Paul Grimm 152 July 2005 Volume 43 Number 1
3 (2005), U.S. Magistrate Judge, District of Maryland, further discussed expert testimony in the judicial systems. Specifically, he reviewed the definition of an expert, expert qualifications, when expert testimony is introduced, and admissibility and credibility of testimony (fact vs. opinion). Barbara Gutek (2005) concluded with some personal experiences as an I-O expert witness for sexual harassment claims. She discussed the issues of I-O research and its application to expert testimony. She concluded with recommendations to expand I-O research to benefit expert testimony. Recommendations for research involved answering questions to topics/issues that have been challenged, including ecological validity designs, replication, and generalization of results. Other Sessions This section covers other legal issues presented in various formats at SIOP. The concept of research for legal challenges was discussed in a panel chaired by Mark Schmit (Schmit, Pulakos, Farr, Denning, Gutman, & Kirkpatrick, 2005). The discussion was on utilizing retrospective research as a method to support large complex organizations faced with legal challenges. Michael Harris chaired a symposium on recent class action discrimination lawsuits and the role I-O psychologists may play in similar lawsuits (Harris, 2005). Jerard Kehoe chaired a symposium on cut scores in employee discrimination. In this symposium, the panel of experts compared current cut score methodology to legal criteria and reviewed key issues in cut scores that have emerged from recent court decisions (Kehoe, 2005). On a similar track to cut scores, Leslie Charles Pedigo and Elizabeth Shoenfelt reviewed cognitive ability testing court decisions in their poster presentation. The review found that the majority of cognitive ability related lawsuits involved claims of racial discrimination. They also found organizations that utilized validated, professionally developed tests, and set cut scores based on the results of the validation prevailed more often than not (Pedigo & Shoenfelt, 2005). Most Popular Topic: Sexual Harassment The most popular topic in legal issues was sexual harassment. It was addressed in seven or more of the presentations. The areas of sexual harassment covered included an overview of sexual harassment law, review and understanding of sexual harassment law, and individual s perceptions and evaluations of sexual harassment. Arthur Gutman (2005b) provided a thorough overview of sexual harassment in his master tutorial. During this session, he clarified the legal definition of sexual harassment, carefully delineated between quid pro quo and hostile environment harassment, discussed scenarios for employer liability, and presented standards for proving sexual harassment. He concluded with recommendations for employment policies. Specifically, he discussed vicar- The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 153
4 ious liability with affirmative defense for hostile environment claims. Vicarious liability with an affirmative defense means that the organization is responsible for the illegal actions committed by supervisors if the organization fails to raise an affirmative defense. When sexual harassment by a supervisor results in a hostile environment, but does not result in tangible employment consequences, an employer can avoid liability by proving that the company had a mechanism in place to prevent and correct sexual harassment and that the alleged victim failed to file the complaint with the appropriate personnel or take advantage of other preventive avenues (Gutman, 2005b). Areview of sexual harassment law was discussed in a poster session by Arthur Gutman and me. In this poster, we empirically investigated employee knowledge of sexual harassment law and concluded that the legal definition is counterintuitive and difficult for employees to understand (McChrystal & Gutman, 2005a). Many of the sexual harassment researchers at SIOP this year investigated how individuals evaluate and perceive sexual harassment in the workplace. A poster session by Elizabeth Shoenfelt and Kathleen Nickel investigated the effects of intoxication on individual and jury perceptions. They found that intoxication may bias an individual and jury decision in a sexual harassment case. Specifically, they found that intoxication impacts individual and jury judgment from both the plaintiff and defendant perspectives. Intoxicated defendants were more likely to be found guilty, and intoxicated plaintiffs were less likely to be viewed as victims of sexual harassment (Shoenfelt & Nickel, 2005). Arthur Gutman and I viewed sexual harassment from the legal perspectives. We investigated whether individuals differently perceive various behavioral scenarios as harassing from the reasonable-person and reasonablevictim perspectives. It appears the victim standard lowers the threshold of unacceptable workplace behavior, and gender served as a moderator for the standards and ambiguous behavior (McChrystal & Gutman, 2005b). Richard Wiener and Roni Reiter-Palmon co-chaired a symposium on how situational and dispositional factors impact an individual s judgment towards a sexual harassment claim and how these factors converge or diverge with sexual harassment law (Wiener & Reiter-Palmon, 2005). Some of the factors investigated were agreement and disagreement between the legal standards, ethical standards, dissolved workplace romances, and the impact contradicting attitudes have on an individual s evaluation of a particular situation. The impact gender and personality characteristics (e.g., empathy, perspective taking, fantasy, and distress) have on the perception of sexual harassment, and how these factors might affect outcomes from the different legal perspectives was also addressed. To conclude, a model to separate psychological injury from hostile environment sexual harassment law was introduced and discussed. Finally, a poster session by Karen Harris, Robert Intrieri, and Dennis Papini (2005) assessed the applicability of the sexual experience questionnaire to adolescents in the workplace and found it to be psychometrically sound. 154 July 2005 Volume 43 Number 1
5 Conclusion Based on the review of legal topics presented, I believe there are many areas for continued research and discussion. The impact of Internet selection on employment decisions should continue to be investigated. Possible new areas involve investigating the impact Internet selection has on adverse impact and affirmative action. Sexual harassment research continues to grow and should continue to research same-sex harassment scenarios. Comparing and contrasting employment law across different countries is another area of promising research growth. From a global standpoint, it is interesting and definitely relevant to learn how other countries govern workplace relationships. A poster session by Sara Turken and Lisa Nishii (2005) compared and contrasted employment law across 57 countries and found that employment law is heavily influenced by the cultural environment. Finally, questions pertaining to legal issues center on expert witness topics and ADEA. How do you become an expert witness? Is there a recommended track for becoming an expert witness? Is the recent ADEA ruling going to increase the number of ADEA filings? To conclude, the various legal topics presented at the SIOP conference were very interesting and informative. References Copus, D. (2005, April). Expert testimony by psychologists in employment cases: The curious history of stereotyping. In F. Landy (Chair), The views of lawyers and judges on I-O expert testimony. Symposium conducted at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Grimm, P. (2005, April). The judicial view of expert testimony. In F. Landy (Chair), The views of lawyers and judges on I-O expert testimony. Symposium conducted at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Gutek, B. (2005, April). Discussant. In F. Landy (Chair), The views of lawyers and judges on I-O expert testimony. Symposium conducted at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Gutman, A. (2005a, April). Internet recruitment and selection: New rules? In F. Landy (Chair), Major issues in employment litigation discrimination. Symposium presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Gutman, A. (2005b, April). Sexual harassment: Legal issues & implications for employer policies. Master tutorial presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Harris, K., Intrieri, R., & Papini, D. (2005, April). Measuring sexual harassment of adolescents in early labor force experience. Poster session presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Harris, M. (Chair). (2005, April). Wal-Mart, Costco, and UPS: I-O psychology and class certification lawsuits. Practitioner forum conducted at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Kehoe, J. (Chair). (2005, April). Cut scores in employment discrimination: Where we are today. Symposium presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 155
6 Landy, F. (Chair). (2005a, April). Major issues in employment litigation discrimination. Symposium presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Landy, F. (Chair). (2005b, April). The views of lawyers and judges on I-O expert testimony. Symposium conducted at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Landy, F. (2005c, April). Observations of federal judges on I-O psychologists as expert witnesses. In F. Landy (Chair), The views of lawyers & judges on IO expert testimony. Symposium conducted at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles, CA. Landy, F. & Copus, D. (2005, April). I-O psychologist as expert witness: The challenges of testimony. Preconference workshop at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational McChrystal, E. & Gutman, A. (2005a, April). Employees understanding of sexual harassment law. Poster session presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational McChrystal, E. & Gutman, A. (2005b, April). The legal perspectives of sexual harassment. Poster session presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Outtz, J. (2005, April). Race discrimination: Past, present, and future. In F. Landy (Chair), Major issues in employment litigation discrimination. Symposium presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Pedigo, L. C. & Shoenfelt, E. (2005, April). A review of cognitive ability testing court decisions since Poster session presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Reynolds, D., Campion, M., Jayne, M., Miaskioff, C., & McPhail, S. (2005, April). Defining Internet applicant: Current guidance and issues. Panel discussion presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Schmit, M., Pulakos, E., Farr, J., Denning, D., Gutman, A., Kirkpatrick, M. (2005, April). Retrospective research in complex organizations for legal defensibility. Panel discussion presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles, CA. Shoenfelt, E. & Nickel, K. (2005, April). Individual and jury perceptions of sexual harassment: Effects of intoxication. Poster session presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Stockdale, M. (2005, April). Disparate treatment sex discrimination: More than meets the eye. In F. Landy (Chair), Major issues in employment litigation discrimination. Symposium presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles, CA. Thornton, G. (2005, April). Industrial and organizational psychologists as expert witnesses: Impacting employment discrimination litigation post Daubert. In F. Landy (Chair), The views of lawyers & judges on I-O expert testimony. Symposium conducted at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Turken, S. & Nishii, L. (2005, April). The relationship between culture and labor/employment laws across fifty-seven countries. Poster session presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Wiener, R., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (Chairs). (2005, April). Sexual harassment law and psychology: Agreements & disagreements. Symposium presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Zink, D. (2005a, April). Fundamentals of employment law: Concepts and applications. Master tutorial presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational 156 July 2005 Volume 43 Number 1
7 Zink, D. (2005b, April). Trends in employment discrimination charges alleging sexual harassment. In F. Landy (Chair), Major issues in employment litigation discrimination. Symposium presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational 141 SIOP Members have enrolled in the system so far. We're waiting for you! The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 157
Legal Issues Overview
Legal Issues Overview When in the least bit of doubt, consult with an attorney who specializes in employment law! You and your organization can be sued for your actions as an HR manager! Protected Class:
More informationEEO 101 The Basic Theories of Employment Discrimination
EEO 101 The Basic Theories of Employment Discrimination An overview of the anti-discrimination statutes enforced by the EEOC An introduction to the theories under which claims of discrimination can be
More informationHuman Resources Training
Pierce County s training program is comparable to that in other local jurisdictions. Direct cost comparisons are difficult without more detailed discussions with providers, but it appears that outsourcing
More informationAugust 2007 Education and Membership Development Department
August 2007 Education and Membership Development Department Table of Contents Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 3 What is Sexual Harassment? 3 4 How Can Sexual Harassment Occur? 4 5 When is an
More informationAmy Oppenheimer 1442 A Walnut Street, #234 Berkeley, CA 94709 (510) 393-4212 amy@amyopp.com
Amy Oppenheimer 1442 A Walnut Street, #234 Berkeley, CA 94709 (510) 393-4212 amy@amyopp.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Workplace Harassment/Employment Discrimination Consultant - 1996 to present Investigates
More informationEmployment Practices Liability Insurance
Employment Practices Liability Insurance What Business Owners Need to Know Right Now A SPECIAL REPORT Employment Practices Liability Insurance: What Business Owners Need to Know Right Now Over the years,
More informationGUIDANCE REGARDING EEO PROCEDURES (1/25/2000)
GUIDANCE REGARDING EEO PROCEDURES (1/25/2000) This provides overall guidance to Foreign Service employees on the procedural requirements for filing a complaint or grievance under the Equal Employment Opportunity
More informationWELCOME. EEO Laws That Impact Small Businesses. Michelle Crew. By Michelle Crew, Settlement Officer U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
WELCOME To the Advanced CBA ReadyTalk Webinar Training Equal Employment Opportunity Commission January 9, 2007 11:00 a.m. 12:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time Please: Check Browser for plug-ins Un-plug PDAs
More informationWendy Musell Stewart & Musell, LLP
Wendy Musell Stewart & Musell, LLP In 2011, the federal government is the Nation's largest employer with about 2.0 million civilian employees. 600,000 employees approximately in the US Postal Service Laws
More informationTIPS FOR RESPONDING TO EEOC COMPLAINTS PRESENTED BY: RICHARD D. ALANIZ
TIPS FOR RESPONDING TO EEOC COMPLAINTS PRESENTED BY: RICHARD D. ALANIZ ERA OF ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT Over the last several years, government agencies that regulate the workplace have been in a mode of aggressive
More informationEMPLOYER S LIABILITY FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORS. Charges of Sexual Harassment Are a Small Business Nightmare Statistics Bare This Out.
EMPLOYER S LIABILITY FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORS Charges of Sexual Harassment Are a Small Business Nightmare Statistics Bare This Out. Last year, 15,222 charges of sexual harassment were filed
More informationAnti-discrimination Laws: Utah
CHRISTINA M. JEPSON, PARSONS, BEHLE & LATIMER, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LABOR & EMPLOYMENT A Q&A guide to state anti-discrimination law for private employers in Utah. This Q&A addresses Utah laws prohibiting
More informationThe Basics of Sexual Harassment
The Basics of Sexual Harassment Sexual Harassment is a violation both of Federal Law and the laws of most states. For employers, it is fairly easy to take steps to prevent sexual harassment and to defeat
More informationEEOC RELEASES ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE ON VICARIOUS EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORS
EEO RELEASES ENFOREMENT GUIDANE ON VIARIOUS EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORS July 1999 www.morganlewis.com Brussels Frankfurt Harrisburg London Los Angeles Miami New York Philadelphia
More informationWHAT POLICIES SHOULD AN EMPLOYER HAVE IN PLACE TO PREVENT LAWSUITS?
WHAT POLICIES SHOULD AN EMPLOYER HAVE IN PLACE TO PREVENT LAWSUITS? Many Employers Are Unaware of the Types of Policies Necessary to Limit Lawsuit Risk or of How to Effectively Draft Employment Policies
More informationAnti-discrimination Laws: North Carolina
View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/w-000-2332 Anti-discrimination Laws: North Carolina J. TRAVIS HOCKADAY, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, WITH PRACTICAL
More informationSUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS UNDER FEDERAL, STATE, and CITY EEO LAWS
SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS UNDER FEDERAL, STATE, and CITY EEO LAWS I. PROTECTED CATEGORIES Protected Classes 42 USC 2000e-2(a)-(c) Prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national
More informationSEXUAL HARASSMENT. Taylor s Special Care Services, Inc. Simon Pop, MBA Chief Operating Officer 2015-2016
SEXUAL HARASSMENT Taylor s Special Care Services, Inc. Simon Pop, MBA Chief Operating Officer 2015-2016 1 Agenda Overview-Why talk about sexual harassment? Why get training? Statistics What is sexual harassment?
More informationLITIGATING SEXUAL HARASSMENT & SEX DISCRIMINATION CASES
LITIGATING SEXUAL HARASSMENT & SEX DISCRIMINATION CASES By Elizabeth Hubbard and Aaron B. Maduff Managing Editor: Lisa J. Dunne, Esq. Production Editor: Amanda Winkler Editor: Rebecca Aranda Contact us
More informationSam Houston State University A Member of The Texas State University System
Finance & Operations Human Resources Policy ER-7 Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) SUBJECT: PURPOSE: POLICY: Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) To provide an educational
More informationMinimizing Employee Retaliation: Do the Right Thing! Ashley E. Bonner, WSO-CST Senior Risk Control Consultant Trident Public Risk Solutions
Minimizing Employee Retaliation: Do the Right Thing! Ashley E. Bonner, WSO-CST Senior Risk Control Consultant Trident Public Risk Solutions Roadmap 1. Definition of Retaliation 2. Frequency & Severity
More informationPolicy on Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania Policy on Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania declares that it is the policy of the
More informationParticipation on University of California Employment Practices Liability Program Defense Panel for UC Davis and UC Davis Health Systems Application
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL BERKELEY * DAVIS * IRVINE * LOS ANGELES * MERCED * RIVERSIDE * SAN DIEGO * SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA * SANTA CRUZ 1111 Franklin
More informationAre the Uniform Guidelines Outdated? Federal Guidelines, Professional Standards, and Validity Generalization (VG) Daniel A. Biddle, Ph.D.
Running head: Are the Uniform Guidelines Outdated? Are the Uniform Guidelines Outdated? Federal Guidelines, Professional Standards, and Validity Generalization (VG) Daniel A. Biddle, Ph.D. CEO, Biddle
More informationWISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT LAW
WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT LAW An Employer's Guide to Legal Proceedings SKINNER AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES Welcome Thank you for considering Skinner and Associates to represent your interests. Your satisfaction
More informationSexual Harassment Law Basics
Sexual Harassment Law Basics A manual brought to you by David Scott Peters The restaurant business by nature is susceptible to claims of sexual harassment. Restaurants are venues of entertainment, which
More informationFEDERAL LAW AND EMPLOYMENT POLICIES. UWGB Office of Human Resources
FEDERAL LAW AND EMPLOYMENT POLICIES UWGB Office of Human Resources Presentation Topics Affirmative Action Equal Employment Opportunity Americans with Disabilities Act Sexual Harassment Diversity Affirmative
More informationCase 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 DAVID BALDWIN, v. Plaintiff, ANTHONY FOXX, in his official capacity as Secretary of The United States Department of Transportation,
More informationSo You Received A Sexual Harassment Complaint, What To Do and What Not To Do A Trial Lawyer s Perspective
So You Received A Sexual Harassment Complaint, What To Do and What Not To Do A Trial Lawyer s Perspective Presented by Kyle Kring and Laura Hess Kring & Chung, LLP 2014 California HR Conference August
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE DIRECTIVE 4300.5 4/6/04 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE DIRECTIVE 4300.5 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM I. PURPOSE This Directive establishes policy, procedures and responsibilities
More informationCharge / Complaint Processing At the EEOC and the DFEH
Charge / Complaint Processing At the EEOC and the DFEH Since you believe you have been discriminated or retaliated against on the basis of a protected characteristic, you should become aware of the following
More informationAppendix B EDR Forms
Appendix B EDR Forms Request for Counseling, Request for Mediation and Complaint forms are provided, but Complainants may use alternative written formats. EDR File No. Request for Counseling Under the
More informationHarry E. Owens, IPMA-CP Adjunct Faculty, University of Georgia. U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission 1
Harry E. Owens, IPMA-CP Adjunct Faculty, University of Georgia U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission 1 What is The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission? What are the Federal Laws Prohibiting Job Discrimination?
More informationFactors Affecting Jury Damages Awards Decisions
Factors Affecting Jury Damages Awards Decisions By Dorothy K. Kagehiro, Ph.D. The use of experts in federal trials has remained fairly consistent across time. In a 1998 survey of 303 United States District
More informationMastery Test--Common Preventing Workplace Harassment California Supervisory Edition
Mastery Test--Common Preventing Workplace Harassment California Supervisory Edition 1. An individual filing a sexual harassment complaint must personally be the intended target of the behavior? Incorrect.
More informationJAMES S. WELIKY, ESQ. Messing, Rudavsky & Weliky, P.C. 50 Congress Street, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02109 (617) 742-0004 jweliky@mrwemploymentlaw.
JAMES S. WELIKY, ESQ. Messing, Rudavsky & Weliky, P.C. 50 Congress Street, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02109 (617) 742-0004 jweliky@mrwemploymentlaw.com EDUCATION NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Juris
More informationYou Are Served : Litigation In The Workplace
You Are Served : Litigation In The Workplace Presented by: Wendy J. Mellk, Esq. Jackson Lewis LLP 58 South Service Rd., Ste. 410 Melville, NY 11747 (631) 247-0404 mellkw@jacksonlewis.com Copyright 2008
More informationRisk Management and Litigation Avoidance An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Risk Management and Litigation Avoidance Risk Management and Litigation Avoidance An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. 2012 COSE Small Business Conference October 25-26, 2012 Presented by Robert
More informationfor Managers and Supervisors
EEO Compliance Training for Managers and Supervisors Presented by Ray Wilson EEO Specialist Learning Objectives Briefly review and discuss major anti-discrimination laws. Increase awareness of workplace
More informationHow New York City Employers Can Avoid Trouble under Mayor de Blasio s New Employment Laws
How New York City Employers Can Avoid Trouble under Mayor de Blasio s New Employment Laws VENABLE LLP May 14, 2014 8:30 a.m. 10:00 a.m. SPEAKERS Nicholas M. Reiter, Esq. Raquel O. Alvarenga, Esq. Natalie
More informationSexual Harassment Awareness
Sexual Harassment Awareness Orientation: This week s on-line assignment is about sexual harassment in the school and the workplace. We are discussing this subject because sexual harassment is an illegal
More informationEqual Opportunity and the Law. Module 2-1
2 Equal Opportunity and the Law Module 2-1 Learning Objectives 1. Explain the importance of and list the basic features of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and at least five other equal employment
More informationTHE GEORGIA NON-PROFIT AND LAWS PREVENTING DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT
THE GEORGIA NON-PROFIT AND LAWS PREVENTING DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT By: Benjamin D. Briggs Anna C. Curry TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 600 Peachtree Street NE Bank of America Plaza, Suite 5200 Atlanta, Georgia
More informationSocial Media and Selection: Ingenuity or Slippery Slope?
Social Media and Selection: Ingenuity or Slippery Slope? Traditionally, applications capturing bio-data, personality or integrity measures, interviews and other assessment instruments have been utilized
More informationManagement. For more information, please contact us at: PH: 419.372.9984 Email: debo@bgsu.edu. www.bgsu.edu/coe/debo
For more information, please contact us at: Management PH: 419.372.9984 Email: debo@bgsu.edu www.bgsu.edu/coe/debo BEST PRACTICES IN ON BOARDING Resources for Onboarding Professionals SHRM FOUNDATION S
More informationPLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013.
PLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013. TOYOTA ASSOCIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ( T-ADR ): Summary Description
More informationSEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR THE SINS OF THE WICKED
SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR THE SINS OF THE WICKED by Peter M. Panken, Esq. Lauri F. Rasnick, Esq. Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, LLP New York, New York Johnna G. Torsone,
More informationPolicy Directive 830-1 September 22, 2008. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Policy and Procedures
Policy Directive 830-1 September 22, 2008 Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Policy and Procedures Purpose: The OIG is fully committed to EEO without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin,
More informationEMPLOYMENT LAW SUMMARY
EMPLOYMENT LAW SUMMARY Federal and State Laws Christina M. Rogers-Spang crogers-spang@rawle.com 856.797.8926 Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York www.rawle.com PHILADELPHIA HARRISBURG PITTSBURGH NEW YORK
More informationNotification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation (No FEAR) Act Training
INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND Updated Dec 09 Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation (No FEAR) Act Training Our Mission: Our mission is to provide the Army the installation
More informationU.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Elaine McArthur Outreach and Training Manager
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Elaine McArthur Outreach and Training Manager November 14, 2013 U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission www.eeoc.gov The EEOC is the key civil rights agency
More informationEmployment Practices Liability Insurance Claims are on the rise. Are you protected?
Employment Practices Liability Insurance Claims are on the rise. Are you protected? Administered by Cooper & McCloskey Inc. What is Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI)? (EPLI) protects companies
More informationKnow right now with the Wolters Kluwer. Labor & Employment Law Library. employmentlawdaily.com
Know right now with the Wolters Kluwer Labor & Employment Law Library employmentlawdaily.com Employment Law Employment Practices Guide This guide offers complete coverage of state and federal antidiscrimination
More informationMAY 2004. Legal Risks of Applicant Selection and Assessment
MAY 2004 Legal Risks of Applicant Selection and Assessment 2 Legal Risks of Applicant Selection and Assessment Effective personnel screening and selection processes are an important first step toward ensuring
More informationHealthStream Regulatory Script
HealthStream Regulatory Script Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Version: May 2008 Lesson 1: Introduction Lesson 2: What Is Sexual Harassment? Lesson 3: Responsibilities of Employers and Employees Lesson
More informationAPPLICATION TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY BAR/ INDIGENT DEFENSE PANEL (IDP)
APPLICATION TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY BAR/ INDIGENT DEFENSE PANEL (IDP) 1. Read the enclosed summary of Program Description, Trial Requirements, Rules, Application, Agreement and Authorization and Release
More informationNavigating Contractor Compliance. Kathy Terrio Contractor Compliance Specialist 406.444.9270 kterrio@mt.gov
Navigating Contractor Compliance Kathy Terrio Contractor Compliance Specialist 406.444.9270 kterrio@mt.gov Contractor Compliance Ensures that contractors and subcontractors performing work on Federally
More informationIntroduction. Forums for Discrimination Complaints. Internally 1B.1 Administrative charge (MDHR, EEOC, OCR) Lawsuit
Discrimination Complaints: Understanding the Institution s Role in Responding to Office for Civil Rights, Minnesota Department of Human Rights and EEOC Charges Intended Audience: Human resources directors,
More informationNew! Workplace Harassment Law. Also Inside: 2010 Cumulative Supplement. Order online at www.bna.com/bnabooks and save 10%!
New! Workplace Harassment Law (formerly Sexual Harassment in Employment Law) By Barbara T. Lindemann and David D. Kadue Also Inside: na ge Discrimination in Employment Law, with 2011 Cumulative Supplement
More informationMoreover, sexual harassment is a violation of federal, state and county fair employment laws.
Sexual harassment interferes with a productive working environment, interjects irrelevant considerations into personnel decisions and generally demeans employees who are victims of harassment. Moreover,
More informationINVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees
INTRODUCTION INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees By: Maureen S. Binetti, Esq. Christopher R. Binetti, Paralegal Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. When can the investigation which may
More informationHow To Get A Police Degree
Police in America Chapter Five Police Officers I: Entering Police Work 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Changing American Police Officer 40 years ago Most officers were white,
More informationFederal and State Employment Laws. HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTANT Michele Arseneau, PHR
Federal and State Employment Laws HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTANT Michele Arseneau, PHR Liability The L Word Employers are paying large $$$ due to charges such as: Wrongful Termination Discrimination Retaliation
More informationCAMBRIDGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY SPECIAL REPORT
CAMBRIDGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY SPECIAL REPORT EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE What It Is and Why You Need It This Special Report was written by Susan Lumetta, J.D., LIC. Mrs. Lumetta is Vice-President
More informationNotification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act Report. Fiscal Years 2004-2006. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act Report Fiscal Years 2004-2006 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission March 2007 -2- TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary...
More informationJ. Bernard Alexander, III
J. Bernard Alexander, III Professional Background Bernard Alexander has been litigating in Los Angeles since 1986. For the past 12 years, plaintiffs employment litigation has been the primary focus of
More informationADDRESSING POLICE MISCONDUCT
U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division ADDRESSING POLICE MISCONDUCT LAWS ENFORCED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE The vast majority of the law enforcement officers in this country
More informationNEW JERSEY STATE POLICY PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICY PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE I. POLICY a. Protected Categories The State of New Jersey is committed to providing every State employee and prospective State employee
More informationTop Ten Organizational Commitments Needed to Make IGO Whistleblower Protection Policies Effective 1
1612 K Street Suite 1100 Washington, DC, USA 20006 202-408-0034 fax: 202-408-9855 Website: www.whistleblower.org Top Ten Organizational Commitments Needed to Make IGO Whistleblower Protection Policies
More informationSEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY STATEMENT
SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY STATEMENT The company is committed to providing a workplace that is free from all forms of discrimination, including sexual harassment. Any employee's behavior that fits the definition
More informationEmployment Representative Experience
Employment Representative Experience Key Issues: Employee vs. Independent Contractor Client Type: Defendant Health Insurance Company Description: The sales agents of a health insurance company claimed
More informationHuman Resource Management Gary Dessler. T-110.5690 Yritysturvallisuuden seminaari Rauli Ikonen
Human Resource Management Gary Dessler T-110.5690 Yritysturvallisuuden seminaari Rauli Ikonen The Book in General 500 pages (+ 50) this presentation is about the first half The main focus is on companies
More information2.25 HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS UNDER THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (SEXUAL AND OTHER HARASSMENT) (05/2015)
2.25 HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS UNDER THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (SEXUAL AND OTHER HARASSMENT) (05/2015) The following charge is based on the Supreme Court's decision in Lehmann v.
More informationASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED WISCONSIN ABUSIVE WORKPLACE ACT (AB 894 ) by Bob Gregg, Boardman Law Firm
ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED WISCONSIN ABUSIVE WORKPLACE ACT (AB 894 ) by Bob Gregg, Boardman Law Firm Workplace intimidation and bullying are serious issues. They cause significant harm to individuals and to
More informationWELCOME TO TEXAS! (http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/la/content/htm/la.002.00.000021.00.htm) prohibits
WELCOME TO TEXAS! The Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA) (http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/la/content/htm/la.002.00.000021.00.htm) prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis
More informationLegislative Update: Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act
Legislative Update: Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act By Christopher W. Olmsted, Attorney Recent legislation signed into law by Gray Davis in his waning days as governor will radically increase
More informationA CONSUMER GUIDE TO FAIR LENDING
FAIR HOUSING LEGAL SUPPORT CENTER A CONSUMER GUIDE TO FAIR LENDING AND HOME OWNERSHIP PRESERVATION A CONSUMER GUIDE TO FAIR LENDING AND HOME OWNERSHIP PRESERVATION OVERVIEW This guide explains your right
More information3 FAM 1500 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
3 FAM 1500 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 3 FAM 1511 POLICY 3 FAM 1511.1 State 3 FAM 1510 EEO GENERAL (CT:PER-780; 08-04-2015) (Office of Origin: S/OCR) a. The Department of State provides equal opportunity
More informationCHAPTER FIVE. The EEOC s regulations, at 29 CFR 1604.11(a), provide an explanation of what constitutes tangible employment action sexual harassment:
CHAPTER FIVE Harassment Cases The theory of harassment can be divided into two categories: (1) harassment resulting in a tangible employment action, and (2) hostile environment harassment. In tangible
More informationTexas State Soil and Water
in Texas Soil and Water Equal Employment Opportunity Training EEO Statement The Soil and Water District is an equal opportunity employer, and does not discriminate against job applicants or employees on
More informationEQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT In accordance with federal and state laws listed here and referenced below (Age Discrimination Act of 1975; Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967; Civil Rights Act of
More informationElizabeth Grossman United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regional Attorney, New York District Office
Elizabeth Grossman United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regional Attorney, New York District Office Age Discrimination In Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) Protects individuals who are 40
More informationWHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT. EEO Publication 133 October 2012
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT EEO Publication 133 October 2012 WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT EEO Publication 133 October 2012 Contents Introduction 3 EEO Laws 4 Administrative Process for Complaints of Illegal
More information2013 Employment Law Update: What are the Courts Saying? Anthony M. Hohn Davenport, Evans, Hurwitz & Smith, LLP
2013 Employment Law Update: What are the Courts Saying? Anthony M. Hohn Davenport, Evans, Hurwitz & Smith, LLP Road Map I. What is Title VII? II. Litigation and Enforcement Trends III. Significant Case
More informationAbout This Online Training
About This Online Training This online training material was designed to be used as a guide only and does not replace federal, state, local, or company codes. The user of this material is solely responsible
More informationEnding Sex and Race Discrimination in the Workplace:
Ending Sex and Race Discrimination in the Workplace: Legal Interventions That Push the Envelope Ariane Hegewisch, Cynthia Deitch and Evelyn Murphy Executive Summary ENDING SEX AND RACE DISCRIMINATION IN
More informationPROTECTION & ADVOCACY INFORMATION PACKET EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION & YOUR RIGHTS AS AN EMPLOYEE WITH A DISABILITY
3710 LANDMARK DRIVE, SUITE 208, COLUMBIA, SC 29204 803-782-0639; FAX 803-790-1946 1-866-275-7273 (VOICE& Language Line) 1-866-232-4525 (TDD) WEBSITE: WWW.PANDASC.ORG PROTECTION & ADVOCACY INFORMATION PACKET
More informationGOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Department of Employment Services
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Department of Employment Services VINCENT C. GRAY MAYOR LISA MARÍA MALLORY DIRECTOR COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD CRB No. 12-042 DENISE CALLENS, Claimant Petitioner,
More informationEMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION Get The Facts
Tom Horne Arizona Attorney General Always remain alert and prepared to protect you and your family Arizona Attorney General s Office 1275 West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 602.542.5025 400
More informationJUROR S MANUAL (Prepared by the State Bar of Michigan)
JUROR S MANUAL (Prepared by the State Bar of Michigan) Your Role as a Juror You ve heard the term jury of one s peers. In our country the job of determining the facts and reaching a just decision rests,
More informationLiabilities and defenses for sexual harassment
Liabilities and defenses for sexual harassment Liabilities and defenses for sexual harassment Resource kit 90132 By Jill R. Muratori, Esq. The U.S. Supreme Court issued two ground-breaking decisions on
More informationADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
POLICY 14-UMBER &/tay2-6t/v ISSUED Edward Mar _ City _Manager March 13, 1997 REVISIONS REVISED SECTION III. Legal Ramifications IV. Policy Implementation V. Non-Retaliation VI. Notification SUBJECT: POLICY
More informationCostliest Termination Mistakes and How to Avoid Them: Leaves, Workers Compensation, Disabilities and More
Costliest Termination Mistakes and How to Avoid Them: Leaves, Workers Compensation, Disabilities and More Michael W. Garrison, Jr. O Melveny & Myers LLP Harold M. Brody Proskauer Rose LLP 0 Preliminary
More informationEquality In The Workplace
All Things EEOC 2013 Update Melanie V. Pate Phone: 602.262.5318 Cell: 480.231.8586 FY12 Charge Statistics 99,412 total charges filed in FY 2012 Slight decrease from FY 2011 -- Race/Color: 36.4% -- Gender:
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 06-1085 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ROBERT J. AYERS,
More informationEmployment and Personal Injury Law
What is the difference between Harassment, Bullying and Discrimination? The terms harassment, bullying and discrimination are used interchangeably but actually have very different legal meanings and remedies.
More informationSTUDENT PROTECTION FROM DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT
STUDENT PROTECTION FROM DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT The Law School has been embracing diversity and equal opportunity since its founding in 1899. Our founders believed that a legal education should be
More informationAbout Us. Experienced Attorneys
About Us The Farrington Law Firm was founded in 2003 to provide a unique alternative in legal services for employers facing workplace challenges and compliance issues. We regularly represent large and
More informationLegal Resource Kit. Sex Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in Employment
395 HUDSON STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10014-3684 (212) 925-6635 FAX: (212) 226-1066 Legal Resource Kit Sex Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in Employment 395 HUDSON STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10014-3684 (212)
More informationRevised 18 January 2013. The University of Texas at Austin University Compliance Services
The University of Texas at Austin University Hello and welcome. This portion of the Compliance Program will introduce you to the topic of Employment Discrimination, and the University's policies and procedures
More information