How Virtualization Breaks Traditional Storage
|
|
- Philip Chambers
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 WHITE PAPER How Virtualization Breaks Traditional Storage Virtual computing has dramatically affected data center infrastructures. It enables companies to move away from inflexible, inefficient infrastructure silos that are complex and brittle. Furthermore, according to Gartner, the total cost of ownership has become oppressive. Virtualization is at the core of a new paradigm the modern data center built on a cloud architecture. The Hybrid Cloud is a set of shared resource pools of compute, network and storage that are allocated on-demand to virtual machines through software. In effect, the infrastructure itself becomes programmable, flexible and efficient, leading to greater agility, simpler management and significantly lower costs. Gartner believes these benefits are so significant that as much as 50% of companies will adopt Webscale IT by 2017 forecasts. It is ironic that much of the savings from server consolidation are lost to the increase in storage costs necessary to create virtual computing solutions that meet production performance requirements. To deliver the full benefits of the Hybrid Cloud, virtual infrastructure is generally deployed using networked shared storage (i.e. SAN, NAS). Valuable administrative utilities like live migration, failover and workload balancing require it. These solutions are based around storage architectures that were developed decades ago when the computing infrastructure was dominated by a one-to-one relationship between physical servers and their associated storage. When used in virtual computing infrastructure, these traditional solutions do not perform well. Administrators unfamiliar with the characteristics of virtual environments are often surprised at the storage performance they get, and begin to add storage to improve performance. As storage is added, costs increase significantly. It is ironic that much of the savings from server consolidation are lost to the increase in storage costs necessary to create virtual computing solutions that meet production performance requirements. Why does this happen in virtual environments? Basically, there is a fundamental mismatch between traditional storage architectures and what virtual infrastructure requires for optimum storage performance and efficiency. Virtual infrastructure essentially shifts the one-to-one architecture of traditional, physical computing to a many-to-one architecture that maps potentially hundreds of virtual machines onto a single storage controller, presenting a single LUN to the hypervisor. Traditional storage architectures can operate in these environments, but suffer significant performance degradation on the order of 40% to 60% and as much as 90% as the ratio of VMs to a LUN increases. This poor performance is due to a phenomenon known as the I/O blender effect. As administrators add more storage to overcome the I/O blender effect to get back to desired performance levels, storage costs increase. Ultimately, administrators are often left with a choice between storage performance that does not meet specified requirements or unexpectedly high costs with storage configurations that are significantly over-provisioned in terms of capacity.
2 PAGE 2 Virtual computing not only poses performance and cost issues for traditional storage, but also demands a management granularity that virtualization just can t provide. Storage is typically managed per-lun for things like snapshot, replication etc. With the many-to-one relationship between VMs and a LUN, a snapshot taken for a LUN may be a snapshot for hundreds of VMs regardless if they wanted the snapshot or not and if they did, is it the right time to take one? The lack of management granularity in traditional storage architectures makes these environments significantly more complex and error-prone to manage, driving operating costs even higher. Traditional Storage Optimized I/O APP OS Controller Capacity Optimized 1:1 Figure 1 Optimized I/O from OS Traditional Storage Optimized I/O Random I/O VM VM VM VM I/O Blender Controller Capacity Many to One Figure 2 Blended I/O removes OS optimizations The I/O Blender Effect Most server operating systems were written under the assumption that they would have direct access to dedicated storage devices. To maximize storage performance, these operating systems optimize their I/O stream to write to disk sequentially. As compared with a very random I/O workload, a conventional spinning disk handling a sequential I/O workload will be able to perform up to 10x more IOPS, thereby driving much higher performance. On the storage side, it could also optimize for a specific I/O pattern. It could coalesce, cache, or pre-fetch data according to a prevailing pattern. Very Random I/O Patterns In virtual environments, a single physical server may be hosting tens or hundreds of VMs, each of which is generating its own optimized I/O stream. These VMs no longer interact directly with the storage, they interact with the hypervisor, which interacts with the storage. The hypervisor multiplexes all the individual sequential I/O streams into an extremely random pattern, which it then writes to disk. The multiplexing of the I/O streams completely undoes any optimization performed by the operating systems of the individual VMs, resulting in an extremely random I/O pattern. And this random I/O pattern from many VMs makes it impossible for the storage controller to optimize for any specific pattern. Random I/O can be significantly slower than sequential I/O. This is because of the additional time it takes to position the read/write heads to a new location to service the I/O request when the relevant blocks are not very close to each other on the disk platters. With a sequential workload, the I/O is ordered in such a way as to minimize the rotational latencies and seek times for each I/O (i.e. the next I/O is relatively close to the last I/O). In random workloads, the rotational latency and seek time associated with each I/O is increased as the read/write heads hop back and forth across the platters to service the I/Os. Very Write-Intensive I/O Patterns I/O tends to be more write-intensive in virtual environments. This is due to the nature of virtual I/O as well as the use of various hypervisor utilities like thin provisioning, snapshots and clones that often require multiple writes to the storage for each write requested by an application. In physical server environments, a workload that exhibited 20% writes and 80% reads was considered write-intensive. In virtual server environments, workloads can easily be comprised of 40% to 50% writes, and in virtual desktop environments, writes can comprise as much as 90% of a steady state workload.
3 PAGE 3 Most types of storage handle writes more slowly than they do reads. With spinning disks, this is primarily due to head settling times which are not required on reads, only on writes. With flash memory-based storage like solid state disk (SSD), higher write latencies are due to additional administrative overhead that is not required for reads. A quick review of the technical specifications for most storage devices will show this to be the case for enterprise-class storage. The I/O Blender Effect Causes an IOPS Problem This very random, very write-intensive I/O pattern is referred to as the I/O blender effect and it essentially increases the input/output operations per second (IOPS) required to service a given set of VM workloads by 40% to 60%. It is a general characteristic of how server hypervisors operate across all major platforms (Citrix, Microsoft, VMware). It means that it takes that much more raw IOPS in the storage to deliver a given level of performance from a VM s point of view. For individual spinning disks, IOPS are a function of the interface (e.g. FC, SAS, SATA) and the rotational speed (e.g RPM, 10K RPM, 15K RPM). A typical SAS 15K RPM drive will generally be capable of delivering 180 IOPS across typical commercial workloads. Disk array vendors generally provide a maximum IOPS rating for their products, assuming a fully loaded array. Assuming a minimum array configuration, an enterprise would add spinning disks to an array to increase its performance (the amount of IOPS it can deliver). If a given workload requires 15,000 IOPS to meet VM performance requirements in a virtual computing environment, then assuming only a 50% performance decrease due to the I/O blender effect an enterprise will need to provide an array with 30,000 IOPS. Assuming a price of $1,500 per SAS 15K RPM disk (a very aggressive street price for enterprise storage), it would take an additional 167 disk spindles to make up the 15,000 IOPS shortfall at a cost of $250,500 (assuming no additional cabinets need to be purchased). This is over and above the initial cost of the array to get it to 15,000 IOPS, and makes no assumptions about the additional energy and secondary storage costs required to support this larger storage configuration. Note that adding disk spindles not only increases performance, but it also increases capacity. By the time a traditional storage configuration has been expanded to meet IOPS requirements, it has way more storage capacity than is needed. In essence, storage capacity that was not needed had to be purchased just to meet performance requirements. The more VMs per host, the worse the I/O blender effect is, the more IOPS are required to hit a given level of performance, and the more expensive the traditional storage configuration will be. All other things being equal, the more random and more write-intensive an I/O workload is, the worse traditional storage architectures will perform. This means that, as bad as the I/O blender effect is in virtual server environments which may have tens of VMs per host, it is much worse in virtual desktop environments that may have hundreds of VMs per host.
4 PAGE 4 Virtual Computing Requires a VM-Centric Management Model Traditional Storage Architecture Server VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 Storage Array Control Plane Data Services Data Plane (I/O) Capacity I/O Blender LUN Storage Control Per LUN Figure 3 Many VMs to one LUN Traditional Storage Architecture Server VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 VM-Centric View: Manage snapshots, replication per VM LUN-Centric View: Manage snapshots, replication per LUN (all VMs) One-to-many data services Clustered file system VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 Storage Array Control Plane Data Services (Snapshot, Replicate...) Data Plane (I/O) LUN-1 Figure 4 LUN-centric management model LUN Storage Control Per LUN VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 Traditional Storage Uses a LUN-Centric Management Model Traditionally, storage has been managed at the storage array level. Virtual storage objects were created and managed through array management GUIs that operated at the logical unit number (LUN 1 level. Storage operations like snapshots, clones, replication and others were performed at the LUN level using the storage array management GUI. When an array was used by a single server, this management model worked fine. The introduction of networked storage where a single array was shared between multiple servers began to break this model. Administrators generally want to perform storage operations on a given server. As soon as a LUN includes data from more than one server, a potential conflict arises. For example, for disaster recovery purposes an administrator may want to replicate Server A to a remote site, but not Server B. If Server A and Server B are both using LUN 1, there is no way to replicate Server A s data without also replicating Server B s. Managing at the LUN level does not provide sufficient management granularity to just replicate Server A s data. The result was multiple LUNs had to be created so there was a 1:1 relationship between Server A - LUN A and Server B LUN B. Now each could be managed cohesively from the storage arrays data services. Virtual computing compounds this problem exponentially in two ways. First, storage administrators have generally wanted to limit the number of LUNs they configure in storage. This is because it is harder and more complex to manage a storage configuration with more LUNs and because storage arrays support a limited number of LUNs. In virtual computing environments with large numbers of VMs, an administrator would often not have enough LUNs to assign one LUN to each VM. Second and more importantly, much of the flexibility gained with virtualization comes from the clustered file system within the hypervisor. VMs are simply represented as files within this file system. The clustered file system is accessible by all hypervisor servers where each can access all files within the clustered file system. This capability allows critical features such as HA or the ability to live-migrate a VM to a different physical server to load balance or for better performance. To make this work, all physical hosts must access the same LUN, and each VM across the virtualized data center lives here as a file on that LUN. A given LUN can easily be supporting thousands of VMs running across multiple hosts. In virtual computing environments, administrators would prefer to still be able to perform storage data services at the VM level, but LUN level management does not come close to meeting this need. It in fact leads to very inefficient use of both storage capacity and network bandwidth. To demonstrate this, let s take a look at creating a snapshot that an administrator wants to replicate. Snapshots are often used to create point-in-time copies for recovery purposes. These point-in-time copies could be used to revert a VM back to a known good state after a patch update caused unexpected problems, they could be used to offload backup to a 1 A LUN is a logical device addressed by the SCSI protocol. While storage administrators have been forced to understand how to manage storage at the LUN level, it is non-intuitive for others and introduces additional issues discussed later in this white paper.
5 PAGE 5 dedicated backup appliance, and they could be used to provide recovery options to meet high availability and disaster recovery requirements. An administrator will not necessarily always want to perform snapshots on the same groups of VMs. What they need is the management granularity to perform snapshots on individual VMs or dynamically created groups of VMs that will vary over time. A LUN could easily be hosting data for ten, twenty or hundreds of VMs. If the administrator specifically just wants to snapshot VM 5, LUN-level storage operations could not do this. It could only snapshot the LUN that VM 5 is on, along with all the other VMs on that LUN. Storing that snapshot would require additional capacity to store VMs that the administrator does not care about just to store that one VM. If the administrator then wanted to replicate that snapshot to a remote location, they would have to replicate all the VMs, not just the one VM. This would take up additional network bandwidth which for many enterprises is precious. What the administrator needs is a VM-centric management model for storage operations. They need to be able to select individual VMs and perform various storage operations on them without consuming storage capacity or network bandwidth to also perform those operations on other unwanted VMs. A VM-centric management model is much more intuitive than a LUN-centric model in virtual computing environments where the data from many VMs resides on each LUN. VM-Centric Easier, more intuititive Manages at VM level (more efficient) Centralized management Works with any storage LUN-Centric Harder to manage Manges at LUN level (less efficient) Fragmented management Storage array-specific Figure 5 A VM-centric management model is much better suited to virtual computing environments than a LUN-centric one. Fragmented Management Model Management granularity is not the only problem traditional storage architectures impose on virtual computing environments. In Microsoft environments, all aspects of a VM can be managed through Microsoft System Center tools like Hyper-V Manager, Virtual Machine Manager and others. This provides an intuitive, easy-to-use management model that is centralized and allows storage operations like thin provisioning, snapshots, clones, replication, and failover to be defined at the level of individual VMs. LUN-level storage operations are, however, managed through the array s management GUI. So if an administrator does decide to use array-based storage management in virtual environments, they will be introducing a second management GUI that fragments the management model, making it less intuitive and more difficult to administer. Virtual administrators would prefer to stay with a more intuitive, VM-centric management model, managing all aspects of their virtual infrastructure through a single integrated management platform like Microsoft System Center. This allows them to select and perform storage operations on individual VMs or dynamically created groups, which is much more efficient than LUN-level management.
6 PAGE 6 High Availability and Disaster Recovery Most commercial production workloads require high availability and disaster recovery, and this is true whether they are running virtual servers or virtual desktops. In the physical world, if a server failed, only its workload was affected. In the virtual world, a physical host may support tens or hundreds of VMs, all of which fail when it fails. For this reason, providing for fast, reliable recovery is generally a part of all virtual computing projects. Clustered File System on Traditional Storage Architecture Server 1 VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 Clustered file system VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 HA Storage Array LUN-1 LUN-1 Server 2 VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 Clustered file system LUN-1 VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 VM.1 VM.2 VM.3 Figure 6 Share storage required for HA High availability is much easier and more cost-effective to configure in virtual infrastructures. Each VM is basically just a file which can potentially be run on any host. In the physical world, failover often required that two hosts a primary and a standby be configured exactly the same. In the virtual world, these constraints are significantly relaxed, creating far less configuration risk and cost when deploying high availability configurations. Shared storage configurations keep a VM s data in a location where it can potentially be accessed by a number of different hosts (although not at the same time). If a given host fails, its VMs can be re-started on other hosts, re-connected to their data on the shared storage, and their applications can be up and running with no data loss very quickly. Most server hypervisors provide native utilities to detect failures and manage recoveries automatically without human intervention. On Microsoft Hyper-V, failover clusters provide this capability. When creating storage configurations in virtual environments, high availability is a strategic consideration which must be considered along with performance (IOPS) and capacity requirements. Meeting performance requirements is primarily an IOPS problem, and there are host-based storage options like flash memory cards and PCIe SSDs that provide a significant amount of IOPS. Why couldn t an administrator just purchase one of these devices for each host to provide the IOPS applications need? If there is no requirement for high availability, then administrators potentially can take this approach to address storage performance in these environments. But if any kind of failover is required, data on these devices is not accessible when their hosts are down, and will not be accessible until their host can be repaired and brought back online. An application could be re-started on another node, but it would not have access to its data (which resides in a failed host and is not accessible). Failover products are designed to detect failures within seconds, and bring applications back up, along with their most recent data, within just a minute or two in virtual environments. But to do so, they must have access to an application s data. Before a storage solution can be chosen, an administrator must understand not only an environment s performance and capacity requirements, but also its high availability requirements. This is why local storage options are often not viable in virtual infrastructure. The real trick is to cost-effectively meet both performance and capacity requirements, while at the same time providing for high availability.
7 PAGE 7 Poor Storage Performance Increasing Storage Cost Fragmented Management Business Implications It should be clear by now that virtual computing environments have significantly greater IOPS requirements than most physical computing environments, and that traditional storage architectures provide a management model that does play well in the many-to-one architecture around which virtual computing is built. The heightened high availability requirements of production virtual infrastructure introduce additional constraints that need to be taken into account. Because storage performance is generally 40% to 60% lower in these environments, there is a significant shortfall that has to be addressed, but it has to be addressed with storage that can support features like live migration, failover and workload balancing. It should also be clear why we stated early on that most storage solutions in virtual environments suffer from some combination of poor performance, unexpectedly high costs, and complex storage management. Sizing a storage configuration to meet performance requirements based on experience in physical server environments will result in poor performance. As additional disk spindles are added to increase IOPS, administrators are also adding capacity along with cost. By the time the IOPS shortfall has been addressed, configurations have way more physical capacity than is required. As that capacity is not used because it is not needed, it is in effect wasted. If high availability requirements exist, local SSDs or other host-based flash products may not be able to entirely address the IOPS shortfall. Host-based storage could be used to improve read performance, but virtual I/O patterns tend to be very write-intensive. SSDs could be purchased for use in the SAN but because the workloads are very write-intensive, these devices must be deployed using a write-back (not a write-through) caching scheme to provide meaningful performance improvements while still supporting failover without data loss. Caching schemes targeted at primarily improving read performance will probably not meet performance requirements for virtual computing s very write-intensive workloads. Lowering the VM density on each host could be used to minimize the I/O blender effect, but this will require additional hosts, which will increase both capital and operating costs, which drives up the cost per virtual server. Summary Virtualization has changed everything and it has broken the traditional storage model. The traditional storage model designed almost two decades before virtualization is broken in the context of the virtualized environment. What made compute virtualization so successful was its transparent insertion into the infrastructure stack. Inserting the hypervisor above the physical hardware and below operating systems meant that applications, OS s and hardware did not realize anything changed. The success of virtualization depended on this transparent insertion into the current infrastructure stack. In effect, neither the hardware or operating systems or applications knew anything changed. Compute resources were instantly turned into software giving a virtual machine complete freedom of movement from one physical machine to another.
8 PAGE 8 Server virtualization of compute resources has created enormous economies of scale, efficiency and flexibility in operating compute infrastructures. While the magic of virtualization is the appearance to operating systems and applications that nothing is changed, the reality is that everything has changed around it and this is the Achilles heel of virtualization. Virtualization has changed everything and it has broken the traditional storage model. Server virtualization has in effect changed the infrastructure stack and as a result placed enormous strain on other parts of the infrastructure namely network and storage. This paper outlined the impact of this architectural mismatch between virtual compute and traditional storage. To address this architectural mismatch, both the network and storage need to be virtualized in a way that matches the architecture of server virtualization. The full promise and value of virtualization will not be realized until both the network and storage undergo the same transformation and the entire infrastructure stack is aligned. Until these architectures align, the savings and efficiency created with server virtualization will simply transfer into increased storage spending and increased operating costs due to the management complexity of a fragmented infrastructure model. Server hypervisors effectively deliver software-defined compute, allowing CPU and memory resources to be defined and allocated as needed without being subject to any physical constraints. Software-defined storage would do the same for storage resources, allowing them to be defined, allocated and optimized on a VM by VM basis. And this is where the real challenges start. There is one fundamental difference between compute and storage compute is transient and storage is persistent. In fact, the physical server that was virtualized now physically exists in storage. Because data is physical and storage is effectively the base of the infrastructure stack, it is also the most difficult to change. Retrofitting an existing storage stack is almost impossible. Simply adding layers of complexity on top of what is already a complex environment just makes the problem worse and more fragile. To make the transition to software-defined storage storage that aligns directly to the virtualized infrastructure stack storage needs to be designed from the ground up for this new architecture. FOLLOW US /gridstore /company/gridstore /user/gridstoreinc t US US UK +44(0) e info@gridstore.com Gridstore. All rights reserved. Gridstore, the Gridstore logo, AutoPilot, Direct I/O, FlashGrid, GridControl, GridProtect, GridScale, Server-side Virtual Controller (SVC), TrueQoS, vcontroller, vlun, vmoptimized, vpool, and vstore are registered, trademarks or pending trademarks of Gridstore in the U.S. and other countries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Information regarding products, services and offerings may be superseded by subsequent documents and are subject to change without notice. For the latest information and specifications regard ing Gridstore and any of its offerings or services, please visit
Server-Side Virtual Controller Technology (SVCT)
TECHNOLOGY BRIEF Server-Side Virtual Controller Technology (SVCT) All traditional storage suffers from the I/O blender that severely impacts application performance, because traditional storage is still
More informationSERVER-SIDE VIRTUAL CONTROLLER TECHNOLOGY (SVCT)
TECHNOLOGY BRIEF KEY BENEFITS Accelerates application Guarantees of your most important apps/s Massively parallel that scales without loss SERVER-SIDE VIRTUAL CONTROLLER TECHNOLOGY (SVCT) Introduction
More informationMaxta Storage Platform Enterprise Storage Re-defined
Maxta Storage Platform Enterprise Storage Re-defined WHITE PAPER Software-Defined Data Center The Software-Defined Data Center (SDDC) is a unified data center platform that delivers converged computing,
More informationWhitepaper. NexentaConnect for VMware Virtual SAN. Full Featured File services for Virtual SAN
Whitepaper NexentaConnect for VMware Virtual SAN Full Featured File services for Virtual SAN Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Next Generation Storage and Compute... 1 VMware Virtual SAN... 2 Highlights
More informationTechnology Insight Series
Evaluating Storage Technologies for Virtual Server Environments Russ Fellows June, 2010 Technology Insight Series Evaluator Group Copyright 2010 Evaluator Group, Inc. All rights reserved Executive Summary
More informationSoftware-Defined Storage: What it Means for the IT Practitioner WHITE PAPER
What it Means for the IT Practitioner WHITE PAPER Extending the Power of Virtualization to Storage Server virtualization has changed the way IT runs data centers across the world. According to Gartner,
More informationSimplifying Storage Operations By David Strom (published 3.15 by VMware) Introduction
Simplifying Storage Operations By David Strom (published 3.15 by VMware) Introduction There are tectonic changes to storage technology that the IT industry hasn t seen for many years. Storage has been
More informationMaxDeploy Ready. Hyper- Converged Virtualization Solution. With SanDisk Fusion iomemory products
MaxDeploy Ready Hyper- Converged Virtualization Solution With SanDisk Fusion iomemory products MaxDeploy Ready products are configured and tested for support with Maxta software- defined storage and with
More informationBest Practices for Architecting Storage in Virtualized Environments
Best Practices for Architecting Storage in Virtualized Environments Leverage Advances in Storage Technology to Accelerate Performance, Simplify Management, and Save Money in Your Virtual Server Environment
More informationMaxDeploy Hyper- Converged Reference Architecture Solution Brief
MaxDeploy Hyper- Converged Reference Architecture Solution Brief MaxDeploy Reference Architecture solutions are configured and tested for support with Maxta software- defined storage and with industry
More informationAnswering the Requirements of Flash-Based SSDs in the Virtualized Data Center
White Paper Answering the Requirements of Flash-Based SSDs in the Virtualized Data Center Provide accelerated data access and an immediate performance boost of businesscritical applications with caching
More informationWHITE PAPER Guide to 50% Faster VMs No Hardware Required
WHITE PAPER Guide to 50% Faster VMs No Hardware Required Think Faster. Visit us at Condusiv.com GUIDE TO 50% FASTER VMS NO HARDWARE REQUIRED 2 Executive Summary As much as everyone has bought into the
More informationIncreasing performance and lowering the cost of storage for VDI With Virsto, Citrix, and Microsoft
Increasing performance and lowering the cost of storage for VDI With Virsto, Citrix, and Microsoft 2010 Virsto www.virsto.com Virsto: Improving VDI with Citrix and Microsoft Virsto Software, developer
More informationTOP FIVE REASONS WHY CUSTOMERS USE EMC AND VMWARE TO VIRTUALIZE ORACLE ENVIRONMENTS
TOP FIVE REASONS WHY CUSTOMERS USE EMC AND VMWARE TO VIRTUALIZE ORACLE ENVIRONMENTS Leverage EMC and VMware To Improve The Return On Your Oracle Investment ESSENTIALS Better Performance At Lower Cost Run
More informationSQL Server Virtualization
The Essential Guide to SQL Server Virtualization S p o n s o r e d b y Virtualization in the Enterprise Today most organizations understand the importance of implementing virtualization. Virtualization
More informationVirtualization of the MS Exchange Server Environment
MS Exchange Server Acceleration Maximizing Users in a Virtualized Environment with Flash-Powered Consolidation Allon Cohen, PhD OCZ Technology Group Introduction Microsoft (MS) Exchange Server is one of
More informationGridstore All-Flash Hyper-Converged Infrastructure for the Cloud-Inspired Data Center Architectural Overview
Gridstore All-Flash Hyper-Converged Infrastructure for the Cloud-Inspired Data Center Architectural Overview WHITE PAPER PAGE 2 Table of Contents The Cost of Traditional Infrastructure has Become Oppressive...3
More informationSERVERCENTRAL DISASTER RECOVERY AS A SERVICE (DRaaS) THE TECHNOLOGY BEHIND SERVERCENTRAL DRaaS. a white paper by
SERVERCENTRAL DISASTER RECOVERY AS A SERVICE THE TECHNOLOGY BEHIND SERVERCENTRAL DRaaS a white paper by SERVERCENTRAL PROVIDES TURN-KEY DRaaS FOR VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS Virtualization provides organizations
More informationDIABLO TECHNOLOGIES MEMORY CHANNEL STORAGE AND VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN : VDI ACCELERATION
DIABLO TECHNOLOGIES MEMORY CHANNEL STORAGE AND VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN : VDI ACCELERATION A DIABLO WHITE PAPER AUGUST 2014 Ricky Trigalo Director of Business Development Virtualization, Diablo Technologies
More informationWHITE PAPER Guide to 50% Faster VMs No Hardware Required
WHITE PAPER Guide to 50% Faster VMs No Hardware Required WP_v03_20140618 Visit us at Condusiv.com GUIDE TO 50% FASTER VMS NO HARDWARE REQUIRED 2 Executive Summary As much as everyone has bought into the
More informationJune 2009. Blade.org 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Contributions for this vendor neutral technology paper have been provided by Blade.org members including NetApp, BLADE Network Technologies, and Double-Take Software. June 2009 Blade.org 2009 ALL RIGHTS
More informationMS Exchange Server Acceleration
White Paper MS Exchange Server Acceleration Using virtualization to dramatically maximize user experience for Microsoft Exchange Server Allon Cohen, PhD Scott Harlin OCZ Storage Solutions, Inc. A Toshiba
More informationSOLUTION BRIEF. Resolving the VDI Storage Challenge
CLOUDBYTE ELASTISTOR QOS GUARANTEE MEETS USER REQUIREMENTS WHILE REDUCING TCO The use of VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) enables enterprises to become more agile and flexible, in tune with the needs
More informationBusiness white paper Invest in the right flash storage solution
Business white paper Invest in the right flash storage solution A guide for the savvy tech buyer Business white paper Page 2 Introduction You re looking at flash storage because you see it s taking the
More informationEnterprise Storage Solution for Hyper-V Private Cloud and VDI Deployments using Sanbolic s Melio Cloud Software Suite April 2011
Enterprise Storage Solution for Hyper-V Private Cloud and VDI Deployments using Sanbolic s Melio Cloud Software Suite April 2011 Executive Summary Large enterprise Hyper-V deployments with a large number
More informationHyper-converged Solutions for ROBO, VDI and Transactional Databases Using Microsoft Hyper-V and DataCore Hyper-converged Virtual SAN
Hyper-converged Solutions for ROBO, VDI and Transactional Databases Using Microsoft Hyper-V and DataCore Hyper-converged Virtual SAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY By Dan Kusnetzky Microsoft Hyper-V together with DataCore
More informationTransforming Data Center Economics and Performance via Flash and Server Virtualization
White Paper Transforming Data Center Economics and Performance via Flash and Server Virtualization How OCZ PCIe Flash-Based SSDs and VXL Software Create a Lean, Mean & Green Data Center Allon Cohen, PhD
More informationIncreasing Storage Performance, Reducing Cost and Simplifying Management for VDI Deployments
Increasing Storage Performance, Reducing Cost and Simplifying Management for VDI Deployments Table of Contents Introduction.......................................3 Benefits of VDI.....................................4
More informationOptimize VDI with Server-Side Storage Acceleration
WHITE PAPER Optimize VDI with Server-Side Storage Acceleration Eliminate Storage Bottlenecks for Fast, Reliable Virtual Desktop Performance 1 Virtual Desktop Infrastructures (VDI) give users easy access
More informationVMware Software-Defined Storage & Virtual SAN 5.5.1
VMware Software-Defined Storage & Virtual SAN 5.5.1 Peter Keilty Sr. Systems Engineer Software Defined Storage pkeilty@vmware.com @keiltypeter Grant Challenger Area Sales Manager East Software Defined
More informationNetApp and Microsoft Virtualization: Making Integrated Server and Storage Virtualization a Reality
NETAPP TECHNICAL REPORT NetApp and Microsoft Virtualization: Making Integrated Server and Storage Virtualization a Reality Abhinav Joshi, NetApp Chaffie McKenna, NetApp August 2008 TR-3701 Version 1.0
More informationNew Features in PSP2 for SANsymphony -V10 Software-defined Storage Platform and DataCore Virtual SAN
New Features in PSP2 for SANsymphony -V10 Software-defined Storage Platform and DataCore Virtual SAN Updated: May 19, 2015 Contents Introduction... 1 Cloud Integration... 1 OpenStack Support... 1 Expanded
More informationFLASH STORAGE SOLUTION
Invest in the right FLASH STORAGE SOLUTION A guide for the savvy tech buyer Introduction You re looking at flash storage because you see it s taking the storage world by storm. You re interested in accelerating
More informationHow To Speed Up A Flash Flash Storage System With The Hyperq Memory Router
HyperQ Hybrid Flash Storage Made Easy White Paper Parsec Labs, LLC. 7101 Northland Circle North, Suite 105 Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 USA 1-763-219-8811 www.parseclabs.com info@parseclabs.com sales@parseclabs.com
More informationEMC XtremSF: Delivering Next Generation Storage Performance for SQL Server
White Paper EMC XtremSF: Delivering Next Generation Storage Performance for SQL Server Abstract This white paper addresses the challenges currently facing business executives to store and process the growing
More informationEverything you need to know about flash storage performance
Everything you need to know about flash storage performance The unique characteristics of flash make performance validation testing immensely challenging and critically important; follow these best practices
More informationOPTIMIZING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION
OPTIMIZING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION HP MULTI-PORT SERVER ADAPTERS BASED ON INTEL ETHERNET TECHNOLOGY As enterprise-class server infrastructures adopt virtualization to improve total cost of ownership (TCO)
More informationLab Evaluation of NetApp Hybrid Array with Flash Pool Technology
Lab Evaluation of NetApp Hybrid Array with Flash Pool Technology Evaluation report prepared under contract with NetApp Introduction As flash storage options proliferate and become accepted in the enterprise,
More informationEMC VFCACHE ACCELERATES ORACLE
White Paper EMC VFCACHE ACCELERATES ORACLE VFCache extends Flash to the server FAST Suite automates storage placement in the array VNX protects data EMC Solutions Group Abstract This white paper describes
More informationAccelerating Applications and File Systems with Solid State Storage. Jacob Farmer, Cambridge Computer
Accelerating Applications and File Systems with Solid State Storage Jacob Farmer, Cambridge Computer SNIA Legal Notice The material contained in this tutorial is copyrighted by the SNIA unless otherwise
More informationVMware Software-Defined Storage Vision
VMware Software-Defined Storage Vision Lee Dilworth (@leedilworth) Principal Systems Engineer 2014 VMware Inc. All rights reserved. The Software-Defined Data Center Expand virtual compute to all applications
More informationWHITE PAPER 1 WWW.FUSIONIO.COM
1 WWW.FUSIONIO.COM WHITE PAPER WHITE PAPER Executive Summary Fusion iovdi is the first desktop- aware solution to virtual desktop infrastructure. Its software- defined approach uniquely combines the economics
More informationDesktop Virtualization and Storage Infrastructure Optimization
Desktop Virtualization and Storage Infrastructure Optimization Realizing the Most Value from Virtualization Investment Contents Executive Summary......................................... 1 Introduction.............................................
More informationMicrosoft Private Cloud Fast Track
Microsoft Private Cloud Fast Track Microsoft Private Cloud Fast Track is a reference architecture designed to help build private clouds by combining Microsoft software with Nutanix technology to decrease
More informationHypervisor-based Replication
White Paper June 2011 Hypervisor-based Replication A New Approach to Business Continuity/ Disaster Recovery Hypervisor-Based Replication Zerto has introduced a virtual-aware, software-only, tier-one, enterprise-class
More informationIOmark- VDI. Nimbus Data Gemini Test Report: VDI- 130906- a Test Report Date: 6, September 2013. www.iomark.org
IOmark- VDI Nimbus Data Gemini Test Report: VDI- 130906- a Test Copyright 2010-2013 Evaluator Group, Inc. All rights reserved. IOmark- VDI, IOmark- VDI, VDI- IOmark, and IOmark are trademarks of Evaluator
More informationThe Modern Virtualized Data Center
WHITEPAPER The Modern Virtualized Data Center Data center resources have traditionally been underutilized while drawing enormous amounts of power and taking up valuable floorspace. Virtualization has been
More informationComparison of Hybrid Flash Storage System Performance
Test Validation Comparison of Hybrid Flash Storage System Performance Author: Russ Fellows March 23, 2015 Enabling you to make the best technology decisions 2015 Evaluator Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
More informationSoftware Defined Storage Needs A Platform
Prepared by: George Crump, Lead Analyst Prepared on: 10/2/2013 Simply put, software defined storage is the abstraction of storage services from storage hardware. This term is more than just marketing hype,
More informationTHE SUMMARY. ARKSERIES - pg. 3. ULTRASERIES - pg. 5. EXTREMESERIES - pg. 9
PRODUCT CATALOG THE SUMMARY ARKSERIES - pg. 3 ULTRASERIES - pg. 5 EXTREMESERIES - pg. 9 ARK SERIES THE HIGH DENSITY STORAGE FOR ARCHIVE AND BACKUP Unlimited scalability Painless Disaster Recovery The ARK
More informationThe next step in Software-Defined Storage with Virtual SAN
The next step in Software-Defined Storage with Virtual SAN VMware vforum, 2014 Lee Dilworth, principal SE @leedilworth 2014 VMware Inc. All rights reserved. The Software-Defined Data Center Expand virtual
More informationNimble Storage Replication
Nimble Storage Replication Nimble Storage Replication Our service provides Disaster Recovery for customers who are using Nimble Storage for their environment. Webhosting.net leverages Nimble's volume replication
More informationBuilding a Flash Fabric
Introduction Storage Area Networks dominate today s enterprise data centers. These specialized networks use fibre channel switches and Host Bus Adapters (HBAs) to connect to storage arrays. With software,
More informationVMware VSAN och Virtual Volumer
VMware VSAN och Virtual Volumer Claes Bäckström RTS Här läggs leverantörsloggor om det finns VMware VSAN 6.0 Här läggs leverantörsloggor om det finns VMware Virtual SAN 6.0 Radically Simple Hypervisor-Converged
More informationWhy Choose VMware vsphere for Desktop Virtualization? WHITE PAPER
Why Choose VMware vsphere for Desktop Virtualization? WHITE PAPER Table of Contents Thin, Legacy-Free, Purpose-Built Hypervisor.... 3 More Secure with Smaller Footprint.... 4 Less Downtime Caused by Patches...
More informationSOFTWARE DEFINED STORAGE IN ACTION
SOFTWARE DEFINED STORAGE IN ACTION Copyright 2014 DataCore Software Corp. All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2014 DataCore Software Corp. All Rights Reserved. 1 Storage is Growing At an Unsustainable Rate
More informationEMC XtremSF: Delivering Next Generation Performance for Oracle Database
White Paper EMC XtremSF: Delivering Next Generation Performance for Oracle Database Abstract This white paper addresses the challenges currently facing business executives to store and process the growing
More informationHIGHLY AVAILABLE MULTI-DATA CENTER WINDOWS SERVER SOLUTIONS USING EMC VPLEX METRO AND SANBOLIC MELIO 2010
White Paper HIGHLY AVAILABLE MULTI-DATA CENTER WINDOWS SERVER SOLUTIONS USING EMC VPLEX METRO AND SANBOLIC MELIO 2010 Abstract This white paper demonstrates key functionality demonstrated in a lab environment
More informationNutanix Tech Note. Data Protection and Disaster Recovery
Nutanix Tech Note Data Protection and Disaster Recovery Nutanix Virtual Computing Platform is engineered from the ground-up to provide enterprise-grade availability for critical virtual machines and data.
More informationIncreasing Storage Performance
Increasing Storage Performance High Performance MicroTiering for Server DAS Storage Andy Mills President/CEO, Enmotus andy.mills@enmotus.com Santa Clara, CA November 2011 Summary Review of challenges of
More informationThe Data Placement Challenge
The Data Placement Challenge Entire Dataset Applications Active Data Lowest $/IOP Highest throughput Lowest latency 10-20% Right Place Right Cost Right Time 100% 2 2 What s Driving the AST Discussion?
More informationThe Power of Deduplication-Enabled Per-VM Data Protection SimpliVity s OmniCube Aligns VM and Data Management
The Power of Deduplication-Enabled Per-VM Data Protection SimpliVity s OmniCube Aligns VM and Data Management Prepared for SimpliVity Contents The Bottom Line 1 Introduction 2 Per LUN Problems 2 Can t
More informationDeep Dive on SimpliVity s OmniStack A Technical Whitepaper
Deep Dive on SimpliVity s OmniStack A Technical Whitepaper By Hans De Leenheer and Stephen Foskett August 2013 1 Introduction This paper is an in-depth look at OmniStack, the technology that powers SimpliVity
More informationServer and Storage Virtualization: A Complete Solution A SANRAD White Paper
Server and Storage Virtualization: A Complete Solution A SANRAD White Paper copyright SANRAD 2008 SANRAD Inc. www.sanrad.com Server and Storage Virtualization: A Complete Solution A SANRAD Whitepaper Server
More informationEMC CLOUDARRAY PRODUCT DESCRIPTION GUIDE
EMC CLOUDARRAY PRODUCT DESCRIPTION GUIDE INTRODUCTION IT organizations today grapple with two critical data storage challenges: the exponential growth of data and an increasing need to keep more data for
More informationOmniCube. SimpliVity OmniCube and Multi Federation ROBO Reference Architecture. White Paper. Authors: Bob Gropman
OmniCube SimpliVity OmniCube and Multi Federation ROBO Reference Architecture White Paper Authors: Bob Gropman Date: April 13, 2015 SimpliVity and OmniCube are trademarks of SimpliVity Corporation. All
More informationFlash Memory Arrays Enabling the Virtualized Data Center. July 2010
Flash Memory Arrays Enabling the Virtualized Data Center July 2010 2 Flash Memory Arrays Enabling the Virtualized Data Center This White Paper describes a new product category, the flash Memory Array,
More informationWhat s New with VMware Virtual Infrastructure
What s New with VMware Virtual Infrastructure Virtualization: Industry-Standard Way of Computing Early Adoption Mainstreaming Standardization Test & Development Server Consolidation Infrastructure Management
More informationTable of contents. Matching server virtualization with advanced storage virtualization
Matching server virtualization with advanced storage virtualization Using HP LeftHand SAN and VMware Infrastructure 3 for improved ease of use, reduced cost and complexity, increased availability, and
More informationWHITE PAPER Optimizing Virtual Platform Disk Performance
WHITE PAPER Optimizing Virtual Platform Disk Performance Think Faster. Visit us at Condusiv.com Optimizing Virtual Platform Disk Performance 1 The intensified demand for IT network efficiency and lower
More informationMicrosoft Windows Server Hyper-V in a Flash
Microsoft Windows Server Hyper-V in a Flash Combine Violin s enterprise-class storage arrays with the ease and flexibility of Windows Storage Server in an integrated solution to achieve higher density,
More informationEvolving Datacenter Architectures
Technology Insight Paper Evolving Datacenter Architectures HP technologies for Cloud ready IT By Russ Fellows January, 2013 Enabling you to make the best technology decisions Evolving Datacenter Architectures
More informationEMC VPLEX FAMILY. Continuous Availability and data Mobility Within and Across Data Centers
EMC VPLEX FAMILY Continuous Availability and data Mobility Within and Across Data Centers DELIVERING CONTINUOUS AVAILABILITY AND DATA MOBILITY FOR MISSION CRITICAL APPLICATIONS Storage infrastructure is
More informationNutanix NOS 4.0 vs. Scale Computing HC3
Nutanix NOS 4.0 vs. Scale Computing HC3 HC3 Nutanix Integrated / Included Hypervisor Software! requires separate hypervisor licensing, install, configuration, support, updates Shared Storage benefits w/o
More informationSoftware-Defined Storage & VMware Virtual SAN 5.5
Software-Defined Storage & VMware Virtual SAN 5.5 Simon Pfau 2014 VMware Inc. All rights reserved. The Software-Defined Data Center Expand virtual compute to all applications Transform storage by aligning
More informationTechnical White Paper Integration of ETERNUS DX Storage Systems in VMware Environments
White Paper Integration of ETERNUS DX Storage Systems in ware Environments Technical White Paper Integration of ETERNUS DX Storage Systems in ware Environments Content The role of storage in virtual server
More informationUnderstanding Microsoft Storage Spaces
S T O R A G E Understanding Microsoft Storage Spaces A critical look at its key features and value proposition for storage administrators A Microsoft s Storage Spaces solution offers storage administrators
More informationThe Benefits of Virtualizing
T E C H N I C A L B R I E F The Benefits of Virtualizing Aciduisismodo Microsoft SQL Dolore Server Eolore in Dionseq Hitachi Storage Uatummy Environments Odolorem Vel Leveraging Microsoft Hyper-V By Heidi
More informationThe Flash Based Array Market
The Flash Based Array Market April 2015 Eric Burgener, Research Director IDC Storage Practice About the Analyst Eric Burgener serves as a Research Director for IDC's Storage Practice, and his areas of
More informationStorage Solutions to Maximize Success in VDI Environments
Storage Solutions to Maximize Success in VDI Environments Contents Introduction: Why VDI?. 1 VDI Challenges. 2 Storage Solutions Optimized for VDI. 3 Conclusion. 6 Brought to you compliments of: Introduction:
More informationNEXSAN NST STORAGE FOR THE VIRTUAL DESKTOP
NST STORAGE FOR THE VIRTUAL DESKTOP Nexsan s innovative product, the NST5000, is a hybrid storage system with unified protocols and highly dense storage for a combination of great performance, low cost,
More informationVDI Appliances Accelerate and Simplify Virtual Desktop Deployment
VDI Appliances Accelerate and Simplify Virtual Desktop Deployment Introduction Early desktop virtualization adopters quickly learned that success or failure of a VDI implementation very often hinged on
More informationHigh Performance Server SAN using Micron M500DC SSDs and Sanbolic Software
High Performance Server SAN using Micron M500DC SSDs and Sanbolic Software White Paper Overview The Micron M500DC SSD was designed after months of close work with major data center service providers and
More informationUnderstanding Data Locality in VMware Virtual SAN
Understanding Data Locality in VMware Virtual SAN July 2014 Edition T E C H N I C A L M A R K E T I N G D O C U M E N T A T I O N Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Virtual SAN Design Goals... 3 Data
More informationBest Practices for Deploying Citrix XenDesktop on NexentaStor Open Storage
Best Practices for Deploying Citrix XenDesktop on NexentaStor Open Storage White Paper July, 2011 Deploying Citrix XenDesktop on NexentaStor Open Storage Table of Contents The Challenges of VDI Storage
More informationVDI Optimization Real World Learnings. Russ Fellows, Evaluator Group
Russ Fellows, Evaluator Group SNIA Legal Notice The material contained in this tutorial is copyrighted by the SNIA unless otherwise noted. Member companies and individual members may use this material
More informationIOmark-VM. DotHill AssuredSAN Pro 5000. Test Report: VM- 130816-a Test Report Date: 16, August 2013. www.iomark.org
IOmark-VM DotHill AssuredSAN Pro 5000 Test Report: VM- 130816-a Test Report Date: 16, August 2013 Copyright 2010-2013 Evaluator Group, Inc. All rights reserved. IOmark-VM, IOmark-VDI, VDI-IOmark, and IOmark
More informationCA ARCserve Replication and High Availability Deployment Options for Hyper-V
Solution Brief: CA ARCserve R16.5 Complexity ate my budget CA ARCserve Replication and High Availability Deployment Options for Hyper-V Adding value to your Hyper-V environment Overview Server virtualization
More informationAdvanced virtualization management for Hyper-V and System Center environments. www.citrix.com
Advanced virtualization management for Hyper-V and System Center environments www.citrix.com Introduction Microsoft Hyper-V provides a dynamic, reliable and scalable virtualization platform enabling cost
More informationVirtual server management: Top tips on managing storage in virtual server environments
Tutorial Virtual server management: Top tips on managing storage in virtual server environments Sponsored By: Top five tips for managing storage in a virtual server environment By Eric Siebert, Contributor
More informationWindows Server 2003 Migration Guide: Nutanix Webscale Converged Infrastructure Eases Migration
Windows Server 2003 Migration Guide: Nutanix Webscale Converged Infrastructure Eases Migration Windows Server 2003 end-of-support means planning must start now James E. Bagley Senior Analyst Deni Connor
More informationSupreme Court of Italy Improves Oracle Database Performance and I/O Access to Court Proceedings with OCZ s PCIe-based Virtualized Solution
enterprise Case Study Supreme Court of Italy Improves Oracle Database Performance and I/O Access to Court Proceedings with OCZ s PCIe-based Virtualized Solution Combination of Z-Drive R4 PCIe SSDs and
More informationMaximizing SQL Server Virtualization Performance
Maximizing SQL Server Virtualization Performance Michael Otey Senior Technical Director Windows IT Pro SQL Server Pro 1 What this presentation covers Host configuration guidelines CPU, RAM, networking
More informationNimble Storage for VMware View VDI
BEST PRACTICES GUIDE Nimble Storage for VMware View VDI N I M B L E B E S T P R A C T I C E S G U I D E : N I M B L E S T O R A G E F O R V M W A R E V I E W V D I 1 Overview Virtualization is an important
More informationAll-Flash Arrays Weren t Built for Dynamic Environments. Here s Why... This whitepaper is based on content originally posted at www.frankdenneman.
WHITE PAPER All-Flash Arrays Weren t Built for Dynamic Environments. Here s Why... This whitepaper is based on content originally posted at www.frankdenneman.nl 1 Monolithic shared storage architectures
More informationWith Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, you can: Take advantage of existing people skills and investments
RED HAT ENTERPRISE VIRTUALIZATION DATASHEET RED HAT ENTERPRISE VIRTUALIZATION AT A GLANCE Provides a complete end-toend enterprise virtualization solution for servers and desktop Provides an on-ramp to
More informationBuilding Private Cloud Architectures
Building Private Cloud Architectures Chandra Rangan Sr. Director, Storage & Availability Management Group Symantec Corporation SNW Spring 2011: Building Private Cloud Architectures 1 State of the infrastructure
More informationRelational Databases in the Cloud
Contact Information: February 2011 zimory scale White Paper Relational Databases in the Cloud Target audience CIO/CTOs/Architects with medium to large IT installations looking to reduce IT costs by creating
More informationVMware and Primary Data: Making the Software-Defined Datacenter a Reality
VMware and Primary Data: Making the Software-Defined Datacenter a Reality CONTENTS About This Document... 3 Freeing Data From Physical Storage Silos... 3 Dynamically Move Virtual Disks to Meet Business
More informationSimpliVity OmniStack with Vormetric Transparent Encryption
SimpliVity OmniStack with Vormetric Transparent Encryption Page 1 of 12 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Audience... 3 Solution Overview... 3 Simplivity Introduction... 3 Why Simplivity For Virtualized
More information