COLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM SYSTEM PRESIDENT S PROCEDURE STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
|
|
|
- Nicholas Hunter
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Page 1 of 7 COLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM SYSTEM PRESIDENT S PROCEDURE STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE SP 4-30 EFFECTIVE: July 1, 1998 RETITLED: September 14, 2000 RETITLED: August 25, 2001 REVISED: January 10, 2011 REVISED: May 9, 2012 REVISED: July 31, 2013 REVISED: June 1, 2014 REVISED: October 1, 2014 REFERENCES: Board Policy (BP) 4-30; System President s Procedure (SP) 4-31a APPROVED: Nancy J. McCallin, Ph.D. System President Application The procedure applies to students within the Colorado Community College System (CCCS). Basis Students are expected to adhere to the Student Code of Conduct and policies and procedures of the College. If a student is charged with violating his/her College s Code, these are the procedures to be used in resolving the charge. Definitions Chief Student Services Officer (CSSO): The individual designated by the College President to administer student affairs and be responsible for administering the College s Student Code of Conduct and this procedure. The CSSO may delegate student discipline to another individual (designee). Code of Conduct: A document developed and published by each college which defines prescribed conduct of students. Day: Refers to working day unless otherwise noted below.
2 Page 2 of 7 Jurisdiction: applies to behaviors that take place on the campus, at System or College sponsored events and may also apply off-campus and to actions online when the Chief Student Services Officer (CSSO), or designee, determines that the off-campus conduct affects a substantial System or College interest. A substantial College interest is defined to include: Any action that constitutes criminal offense as defined by federal or Colorado law. This includes, but is not limited to, single or repeat violations of any local, state or federal law committed in the municipality where the System or the College is located; Any situation where it appears that the accused individual may present a danger or threat to the health or safety of self or others; Any situation that significantly impinges upon the rights, property or achievements of self or others or significantly breaches the peace and/or causes social disorder; and/or Any situation that is detrimental to the educational interests of System or the College. Any online postings or other electronic communication by students, including cyberbullying, cyber-stalking, cyber-harassment, etc... occurring completely outside of the System or the College s control (e.g., not on System or College networks), websites or between System or College accounts) will only be subject to this procedure when those online behaviors can be shown to cause a substantial on-campus disruption. Otherwise, such communications are considered speech protected by the 1 st Amendment to the Constitution. Notice: Notices which are required to be given by this procedure shall be considered served upon the student when given by personal delivery, mailing by certified mail, or ing the student to their official College address requesting a delivery receipt notification. If notice is mailed, student shall be given three (3) additional days to respond. Sanctions: One or more of the following may be imposed when there is a finding that a student has violated the College s Code of Conduct. 1. Warning: A Notice served upon the student advising him/her that he/she is violating or has violated College regulations. 2. Probation: After a finding of violation of the Code of Conduct, restriction of student s privileges for a designated period of time including the probability of more severe disciplinary sanctions if the student is found to be violating any College regulations during the probationary period.
3 Page 3 of 7 3. Other disciplinary sanction: fines, restitution, denial of privileges, assignment to perform services for the benefit of the College or community; re-assignment to another class section, including a potential on-line section, or other sanction that doesn t result in the student being denied the right of attending classes. 4. College Suspension or Expulsion: An involuntary separation of the student from the College for misconduct not based on academic performance for a specified period of time. a. Suspension is a separation that shall not exceed three academic terms per suspension for any singular offense or situation. While a student is suspended, he or she is not eligible for admission or re-admission at any of the community colleges within the System. Additionally, if a student is suspended at any of the other Auraria Campus Institutions (i.e., Metropolitan State University of Denver (MSUD) or the University of Colorado Denver (UCD)), he or she will not be eligible for admission or readmission at the Community College of Denver (CCD). Once the suspension is lifted at any of the community colleges within the System, the student may be eligible for admission or re-admission. Examples of suspension include, but are not limited to the following: the College, a department or program, a class, residence hall, use of a College facility or an activity. Students may be suspended from one class period by the responsible faculty member or adjunct instructor. Longer suspensions can only be implemented by the CSSO or designee in accordance with this procedure. b. Expulsion is an indefinite separation from the college. The student is not eligible for admission or re-admission at any of the community colleges within the System. Additionally, if a student is expelled at MSUD or UCD, he or she will not be eligible for admission or re-admission at CCD. In exceptional cases where a student wants to be considered for admission or re-admission after an expulsion has been implemented, the student bears the burden to prove the behavior that resulted in the expulsion has been resolved. It is within the College s discretion to admit or deny the student. 5. Interim Action: An immediate action taken by the CSSO to ensure the safety and well-being of members of the System or College community; preservation of System or College property; or if the student poses a definite threat of disruption or interference to others or the normal operations of the System or College. In the event of an interim action, the hearing before the CSSO or designee shall occur as soon as possible following the interim action. If the College issues a permanent sanction, the student shall be afforded appeal rights as discussed below. If the
4 Page 4 of 7 College does not implement a permanent sanction, the interim action will be removed from the student s record. 6. The college may issue a Cease Communications directive and/or a No Trespass directive, also referred to as a persona non grata. Student: All persons taking courses at or sponsored by the College(s), both full-time and part-time, pursuing both undergraduate credit and non-credit courses and those concurrently attending secondary or post secondary institutions and College. Persons who are not officially enrolled for a specific term, but who have a continuing relationship with the college are considered students. Title IX Coordinator(s) and Title VI and VII Coordinator(s) (EO Coordinator): designated by the College President to oversee all civil rights complaints. Procedures The CSSO or designee shall receive all allegations of student misconduct, investigate the complaints, which includes meeting with the student to give him/her the opportunity to respond to the allegations of misconduct. If the allegations of misconduct are discrimination and/or harassment based on federal or state civil rights laws, the College will investigate those incidents through the Civil Rights Grievance and Investigation Process, System President s Procedure (SP) 3-50b and 4-31a at Once the investigation is complete, either through this process or the Civil Rights Grievance and Investigation Process, the CSSO or designee shall render a sanction decision. The CSSO or designee may decide that the charges can be disposed of administratively by mutual consent of the parties involved on a basis acceptable to them. If an administrative resolution is not achieved, the CSSO or designee shall issue a decision which determines whether the alleged conduct occurred; whether the conduct violated the Code of Conduct or College procedures; and impose a sanction(s) if appropriate. The student shall receive written notice of the decision and be advised of his/her right to appeal the decision, subject to the grounds below, by filing a written appeal with the CSSO or designee within seven (7) days of service of the decision. Appeal In the event of an appeal, the CSSO or designee shall give written notice to the other party (e.g., if the accused student appeals, the appeal is shared with the complainant who may also wish to file a response), and then the CSSO or designee will draft a response memorandum (also shared with all parties). All appeals and responses are then forwarded to the appeals officer or committee for initial review to determine if the appeal meets the limited grounds and is timely. The original finding and sanction will stand if the appeal is not timely or substantively eligible, and the decision is final.
5 Page 5 of 7 If the appeal has standing, the documentation is reviewed. Because the original finding and sanction are presumed to have been decided reasonably and appropriately, the party appealing the decision must specifically cite the error(s) in the original determination on which the appeal is based. The ONLY grounds for appeal are as follows: 1. A material procedural or substantive error occurred that significantly impacted the outcome of the hearing (e.g. substantiated bias, material deviation from established procedures); which must be explained in the written appeal; or 2. To consider new evidence, unavailable during the investigation or hearing that could substantially impact the original finding or sanction. A summary of this new evidence and its potential impact must be included in the written appeal, as well as the reasons the new evidence was not available during the original proceeding. If the appeals officer or committee determines that a material procedural or substantive error occurred, it may return the complaint to the CSSO or designee with instructions to reconvene to cure the error. In rare cases, where the procedural or substantive error cannot be cured by the CSSO or designee in cases of bias, the appeals officer or committee may order a new hearing be held by a different individual acting in the place of the designated CSSO or designee. The results of a reconvened hearing cannot be appealed. The results of a new hearing can be appealed, once, on the two applicable grounds for appeals. If the appeals officer or committee determines that new evidence should be considered, it will return the complaint to the CSSO or designee to reconsider in light of the new evidence, only. If the subject matter pertains to civil rights violations pursuant to SP 4-31a, the appeals officer or committee will return the complaint to the Title IX/EO Coordinator to reconsider in light of the new evidence, only. The reconsideration of the CSSO, designee, or Title IX/EO Coordinator is not appealable. The procedures governing the hearing of appeals include the following: All parties should be timely informed of the status of requests for appeal, the status of the appeal consideration, and the results of the appeal decision. If the appeals officer or committee determines there is new evidence or error in the original proceeding, every opportunity to return the appeal to the CSSO or designee for reconsideration (remand) should be pursued. Appeals are not intended to be full rehearings of the complaint (de novo). In most cases, appeals are confined to a review of the written documentation or record of the original hearing, and pertinent documentation regarding the grounds for appeal.
6 Page 6 of 7 An appeal is not an opportunity for an appeals officer or committee to substitute their judgment for that of the CSSO or designee merely because they disagree with its finding and/or sanctions. Appeals decisions are to be deferential to the original decision, making changes to the findings only where there is clear error and a compelling justification to do so. Sanctions imposed are implemented immediately unless the CSSO or designee stays their implementation in extraordinary circumstances, pending the outcome of the appeal. The appeals officer or committee will render a written decision on the appeal to all parties within seven (7) days from receiving the appeal request. The committee s decision to deny appeal requests is final. Special Discipline Process Provisions In the event that the student is under the age of eighteen (18) or incapacitated, he or she may have an advisor present to assist him/her in presenting his/her case. The student may have the opportunity to be advised by a personal advisor of their choice, at their expense, at any stage of the process and to be accompanied by that advisor at any meeting or hearing; however, student cannot be represented by an attorney or law student (legal counsel) unless civil or criminal actions concerning the particular incident in question are pending. Under those limited exceptions, the legal counsel s role shall be advisory only. The student must notify the CSSO of the identity of the advisor at least two (2) days before the date of any scheduled meeting. If meetings are scheduled with less than two (2) days notice, the student is expected to notify the CSSO as soon as possible. The student is responsible for presenting his/her own case and, therefore, advisors are not permitted to speak or to participate directly in any hearing except when the student is under the age of eighteen (18) or incapacitated. Student shall have the right to identify documents, witnesses and other material he/she would like the CSSO or designee to review before making a final decision. Any hearing held shall be conducted in private unless all parties agree otherwise.
7 Page 7 of 7 A record of the hearing should be maintained by the CSSO or designee. Audio and/or Video Recording- the college, at its discretion, may audio or video record any meeting throughout the process. Should a recording exist, the student may request a copy at the end of the process. No other audio or video recording will be allowed. If student has a disability and would like to request an accommodation to assist him/her through the discipline process they may do so by informing the CSSO or designee. The CSSO or designee will then work with disability support services to accommodate the request. Proceedings under this procedure may be carried out prior to, simultaneously with, or following civil or criminal proceedings off-campus. Standard of proof-the College will use the preponderance of evidence standard in the disciplinary proceedings, meaning, the College will determine whether it is more likely than not a conduct code was violated. All sanctions imposed by the original decision maker will be in effect during the appeal. A request may be made to the CSSO or designee for special consideration in exigent circumstances, but the presumptive stance of the college is that the sanctions will stand. Graduation, study abroad, internships/externships/clinical placements, etc. do not in and of themselves constitute exigent circumstances, and students may not be able to participate in those activities during their appeal. In cases where the appeal results in reinstatement to the college or of privileges, all reasonable attempts will be made to restore the student to their prior status, recognizing that some opportunities lost may be irretrievable in the short term. The procedural rights afforded to students above may be waived by the student. All timelines may be extended as agreed upon by both parties. Retaliatory Acts It is a violation of this procedure to engage in retaliatory acts against any employee or student who reports an incident(s) of Code of Conduct violations or any employee or student who testifies, assists or participates in the discipline proceeding, investigation or hearing relating to such allegation(s) of Code of Conduct violations. Revising this Procedure CCCS reserves the right to change any provision or requirement of this procedure at any time and the change shall become effective immediately.
Palomar Community College District Procedure AP 5520
1 STUDENT SERVICES 2 AP 5520 STUDENT DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 References: Education Code Sections 66017, 66300, 69810-69813,
Michigan State University Anti-Discrimination Policy/Relationship Violence & Sexual Misconduct Policy Student Conduct Review Panel Procedures
Michigan State University Anti-Discrimination Policy/Relationship Violence & Sexual Misconduct Policy Student Conduct Review Panel Procedures Background The University prohibits acts of harassment and
INVOLUNTARY MEDICAL WITHDRAWAL
INVOLUNTARY MEDICAL WITHDRAWAL This policy was accurate as of the date printed below I. PURPOSE One of the University's purposes is to ensure equality of educational opportunity while fostering an environment
Attorney Guidelines for Student Representation
Attorney Guidelines for Student Representation In order to best serve the student, your client, who is involved in a disciplinary matter at East Carolina University ( ECU / University ), the following
Section D: Teaching and Student Related Policies
Section D: Teaching and Student Related Policies May 31, 2016 The University of New Mexico MSC05 3340 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 Phone 505.277.4664 Fax 505.277.4665 secretary.unm.edu
Resolution Agreement Southern Virginia University Case Nos. 11-14-2288 and 11-14-2290
Resolution Agreement Southern Virginia University Case Nos. 11-14-2288 and 11-14-2290 Southern Virginia University (the University) agrees to fully implement this resolution agreement (the Agreement) to
Franklin Technology Center s Code of Conduct
Franklin Technology Center s Code of Conduct Franklin Technology Center is comprised of students, faculty, staff and administrators. This community recognizes the need to establish a code of conduct that
Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights. Sections 112.532-534, F.S. 112.532 Law enforcement officers' and correctional officers' rights.
Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights Sections 112.532-534, F.S. 112.532 Law enforcement officers' and correctional officers' rights.-- All law enforcement officers and correctional officers employed
STUDENT CODE OF CONDUCT
i? STUDENT CODE OF CONDUCT Student Conduct Review Procedures Mission Statement As a central function of the Dean of promotes a safe campus environment by educating students about their developmental process
Alcohol and Substance Abuse Policy
Alcohol and Substance Abuse Policy The purpose of the imposition of sanctions in a student disciplinary action is to redirect the student s behavior toward a pattern more acceptable within the College
COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES STUDENT ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT POLICY Effective April 29, 2009
COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES STUDENT ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT POLICY Effective April 29, 2009 The following policy defines a uniform approach to acts of academic misconduct involving students in courses
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, REGION I
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, REGION I 5 POST OFFICE SQUARE, 8 th FLOOR BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109-3921 December 30, 2014 Martha C. Minow, Dean Harvard Law School Griswold
Michigan State University Office of Institutional Equity COMPLAINT PROCEDURES
Michigan State University Office of Institutional Equity COMPLAINT PROCEDURES The Office of Institutional Equity ( OIE ) is responsible for ensuring the University s compliance with federal and state laws
Effective Date: November 14, 2003 Page 1 of 1
1086.0.0 DHS MEDIATION/GRIEVANCE POLICY (Gov s Proclamations EO 86-1, 7-16-85 & EO93-01, 7-1-93) 1086.0.1 This policy establishes procedures for resolving workplace disputes and disciplinary issues. 1086.0.2
2. SUPPORT SERVICES, ACADEMIC ACCOMMODATIONS, AND SPECIAL CLASS INSTRUCTION
LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGES OFFICE OF THE CHANCELLOR ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS REFERENCE: Title 5, Sections 56000, 56002, 56004, 56005, 56006, 56010, 56026, 56027, 56028, 56029 ISSUE DATE: October
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK. College of Environmental Science and Forestry. Student Judicial Handbook
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK College of Environmental Science and Forestry Student Judicial Handbook STUDENT JUDICIAL HANDBOOK State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry
How To Resolve A Complaint Of Discrimination In The United States
ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS TITLE IX GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES PURPOSE: The purpose of these procedures is to secure, at the lowest possible level, prompt and equitable resolutions of complaints based on sex discrimination,
How To Find Out If A Student Has Violated The Honor Code
ACADEMIC HONOR CODE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE SCHOOL OF LAW PREAMBLE The purpose of this Academic Honor Code is to promote academic, extracurricular, and professional opportunities in an atmosphere
How To Handle A Title Ix Complaint At Anorexic State University
RESOLUTION AGREEMENT OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY OCR DOCKET #15-10-6002 The U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR), initiated this proactive compliance review of The Ohio State University
MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY DRUG FREE WORKPLACE AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLICY
MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY DRUG FREE WORKPLACE AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLICY PURPOSE: POLICY: I. To establish policies and procedures whereby Midwestern University shall, in order to appropriately serve the needs
NEWMAN UNIVERSITY DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE
1. Scope and Purpose NEWMAN UNIVERSITY DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE 1.1 Newman University [hereafter referred to as the University] recognises disciplinary rules and procedures are necessary for the
SEXUAL ASSAULT POLICY
SEXUAL ASSAULT POLICY California State University, Stanislaus is strongly committed to the establishment of an educational environment in which students, faculty, and staff can work together in an atmosphere
ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London. DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE (for all staff other than academic teaching staff)
APPROVED BY COUNCIL September 2002 ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE (for all staff other than academic teaching staff) Disciplinary Policy and Procedure September 2002
Academic Honor Code 1
Academic Honor Code 1 1. Applicability. This code applies to all student-related academic aspects of the Ross School of Business (RSB) Statement of Community Values. It covers all student academic activities
Disciplinary Policy and Procedure
Disciplinary Policy and Procedure Policy The success of the University is dependent on its most important resource, its staff. It is therefore vital that all employees are encouraged to work to the best
NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE POLICY ON GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT
NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE POLICY ON GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT It is the policy of North Carolina Wesleyan college that unlawful gender discrimination in any form, including sexual
APPENDIX C. HARASSMENT, BULLYING, DISCRIMINATION, AND HATE CRIMES (Adaptedfrom the Attorney General's Safe Schools initiative)
APPENDIX C HARASSMENT, BULLYING, DISCRIMINATION, AND HATE CRIMES (Adaptedfrom the Attorney General's Safe Schools initiative) This section of the Code of Conduct has been adapted from the Greenfield Public
College of Health and Human Services Disciplinary Review and Appeals Process for Violations of Professional Ethics or Conduct
College of Health and Human Services Disciplinary Review and Appeals Process for Violations of Professional Ethics or Conduct Professional ethics are at the core of the College of Health and Human Services
Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
31.02.01.00 Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION Subtitle 02 POWERS AND DUTIES HEARINGS Chapter 01 Hearings Authority: Insurance Article, 2-109 and 2-205 2-215; State Government Article, 10-206;
Program Statement. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Program Statement OPI: CPD/CPB NUMBER: P5264.08 DATE: SUBJECT: Inmate Telephone Regulations CORRECTED COPY 2/11/2008" Boxed Bold - Federal Regulation
INDIVIDUAL HIPAA RIGHTS (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)
INDIVIDUAL HIPAA RIGHTS (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) All staff with access to protected health information will follow the procedures below: Alternate Communications: The district
PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT BY FULL-TIME & PART-TIME GRADUATE STUDENTS
The Johns Hopkins University Krieger School of Arts & Sciences/Whiting School of Engineering PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT BY FULL-TIME & PART-TIME GRADUATE STUDENTS Established March
STUDENT-ATHLETE DRUG EDUCATION AND TESTING POLICY
STUDENT-ATHLETE DRUG EDUCATION AND TESTING POLICY I. INTRODUCTION. The overall goal of Rogers State University's Student-Athlete Drug Education and Testing Policy is to promote a year-round drug free environment
HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION AND INSTITUTIONAL VANDALISM - Policy No. C006
EDINBORO UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION AND INSTITUTIONAL VANDALISM - Policy No. C006 Supersedes Policy C006, Dated 10/10/89, 1/10/90, 7/25/94, 2/1/04, 5/1/04, 4/3/08, 1/18/10 & 1/25/11
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY WHITING SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ZANVYL KRIEGER SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY WHITING SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ZANVYL KRIEGER SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES PROCEDURES FOR DEALING WITH ISSUES OF RESEARCH MISCONDUCT 1. Introduction 2. Reporting 3. Inquiry 4. Investigation
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE INTRODUCTION These procedures are compliant with the ACAS code of practice and are designed to help and encourage staff at Pilgrims Hospice to achieve and maintain required standards
RULE. Office of the Governor Real Estate Appraisers Board. Appraisal Management Companies (LAC 46:LXVII.Chapters 301-309)
RULE Office of the Governor Real Estate Appraisers Board Appraisal Management Companies (LAC 46:LXVII.Chapters 301-309) Under the authority of the newly enacted Appraisal Management Company Licensing and
This grievance resolution procedure establishes guidelines for the prompt and equitable
Employee Grievance Resolution Procedures... 1 I. Grievance Manager Designation... 2 II. Definition and Scope... 2 A. Promotion... 2 B. Classification... 3 C. Discipline... 3 D. Leave... 3 E. Employee Performance
GENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICY APM - 016 REGARDING ACADEMIC APPOINTEES University Policy on Faculty Conduct and the Administration of Discipline
University Policy on Faculty Conduct and the Administration of Discipline The University policy on faculty conduct and the administration of discipline is set forth in its entirety in this policy and in
LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS
LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS TRIBAL COURT Chapter 7 Appellate Procedures Court Rule Adopted 4/7/2002 Appellate Procedures Page 1 of 12 Chapter 7 Appellate Procedures Table of Contents 7.000
APPEARANCE, PLEA AND WAIVER
Guide to Municipal Court What Types of Cases Are Heard in Municipal Court? Cases heard in municipal court are divided into four general categories: Violations of motor vehicle and traffic laws Violations
HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP
HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP The Houston Lawyer Referral Service, Inc. (HLRS) is a non-profit corporation sponsored by the Houston Bar Association, Houston Young Lawyers Association,
CSEk 1811 ~ Civil Service Law SECTION 75. A Basic Primer. 143 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12210 Danny Donohue, President
1811 ~ Civil Service Law SECTION 75 A Basic Primer Since 1910 CSEk New York's LEADING Union 143 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12210 Danny Donohue, President csea, Inc. I Updated January 2013 CSEA
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association Enacted November 18, 2015 Preamble and Purpose 1.) Background. Under Rule V, Section 5 of the
HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY. Date of Policy 1993 Date policy to be reviewed 09/2014
HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY Date of Policy 1993 Date policy to be reviewed 09/2014 Policy written by SFC/HR Risk Register Ref (s) HR7 Impact Assessed EDG Date Impact assessed 10/2012
ADMISSIONS AND EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS. Adopted July 2007
TITLE 4. ADMISSIONS AND EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS Adopted July 2007 DIVISION 2. ACCREDITED LAW SCHOOL RULES Chapter 1. General Provisions Rule 4.100 Authority The Committee of Bar Examiners ( the Committee
SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES
SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES SECTION 1 - POLICY It is the policy of the Sixth Judicial District ( district ) to encourage out-of-court
CHAPTER 43-41 SOCIAL WORKERS
CHAPTER 43-41 SOCIAL WORKERS 43-41-01. Definitions. In this chapter, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires: 1. "Board" means the North Dakota board of social work examiners. 2. "College
Dispute Resolution Procedures for Administrative/Professional and Clerical/Service Staff Members
Dispute Resolution Procedures for Administrative/Professional and Clerical/Service Staff Members These operating procedures supplement the policy on Dispute Resolution for Administrative/Professional and
Computer, Communication, and Network Technology Acceptable Use
Policy V. 2.10.2 Responsible Official: Dean of University Libraries and Chief Information Officer Effective Date: April 12, 2010 Computer, Communication, and Network Technology Acceptable Use Policy Statement
This policy has been created using the WBC Model Policy Version December 2013.
POLICY TITLE: REVISED: January 2013 NEXT REVIEW DATE: Autumn / 2015 APPROVED BY COMMITTEE: Full Governing Body This policy has been created using the WBC Model Policy Version December 2013. Principles
Course registration Students may register for courses of study and drop or add courses only with the approval of the MLS director.
Master of Liberal Studies (MLS) graduate students must meet the following minimums, deadlines and course or grade requirements to graduate in good standing from the university. These policies are based
Please note that this Act can also be viewed online on the Illinois General Assembly website at www.ilga.gov.
Please note that this Act can also be viewed online on the Illinois General Assembly website at www.ilga.gov. SCHOOLS (105 ILCS 10/) Illinois School Student Records Act. (105 ILCS 10/1) (from Ch. 122,
LAS VEGAS MUNICIPAL CODE. 2.64.010 Created--Purpose. 2.64.020 Definitions. 2.64.030 Director.
LAS VEGAS MUNICIPAL CODE 2.64.010 Created--Purpose. Pursuant to the authority of Chapter 289 of the Nevada Revised Statutes there is created the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Citizen Review
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT NOTICE OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT NOTICE OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS Tennessee Department of Education Division of Special Education Department of Education February 11, 2008; Publication Authorization
How To Get A Grade At A College
Page 1 of 21 (1) GRADING SYSTEM: ACHIEVEMENT AT COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE (CSCC) Letter grades based on student achievement will be assigned to students enrolled in individual degree-credit courses
ARTICLE V. DISCRIMINATION AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY
ARTICLE V. DISCRIMINATION AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY Sec. 24-90. Policy. (a) It is the policy of the city that no individual with a disability shall, on the basis of a disability, be excluded
Procedures for Addressing Cases of Academic Dishonesty
Procedures for Addressing Cases of Academic Dishonesty A Manual for Academic Deans, Chairs, and Program Administrators 2011-2012 Office of the Provost Miami University RESOURCE INFORMATION Procedures for
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA) CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ETHICS CASE PROCEDURES
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA) CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ETHICS CASE PROCEDURES INTRODUCTION. The ISA Certification Board develops and promotes high ethical standards for the Certified Arborist
PROCEDURE Police Staff Discipline. Number: C 0901 Date Published: 9 May 2013
1.0 Summary of Changes Amendments to the 1 st bullet point of section 4.5 and the 3 rd, 4 th, 6 th and 7 th bullet point in section 4.8 have been made. Section 4.9 has been removed as the content is now
AUBURN UNIVERSITY TITLE XII STUDENT ACADEMIC HONESTY CODE
AUBURN UNIVERSITY TITLE XII STUDENT ACADEMIC HONESTY CODE CHAPTER 1200 Definition 1200 This act shall be known as the Student Academic Honesty Code. The Student Academic Honesty Code applies to all students
DESCRIPTION AND RULES OF OPERATION
DESCRIPTION AND RULES OF OPERATION 1. History and Purpose The Lawyer Referral Service of Central Texas ( Service ) is organized and operates to provide a public service by which any person may readily
Sex Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, and Related Unprofessional Conduct Policy No. G004
EDINBORO UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Sex Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, and Related Unprofessional Conduct Policy No. G004 Supersedes Policy G004, Dated 10/7/88, 1/10/90, 12/2/92, 1/l/99, 1/1/04, 2/29/08,
DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE
DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE Date of Publication: April 2013 Agreed by: Vice Chancellor s Executive March 2013 Page 1 of 13 Policy 1.0 Introduction The purpose of the disciplinary policy and procedure
Advocating for Campus Survivors Using Title IX: A guide for advocates and attorneys. Amanda Walsh, Esq. Victim Rights Law Center
Advocating for Campus Survivors Using Title IX: A guide for advocates and attorneys Amanda Walsh, Esq. Victim Rights Law Center 2013 Victim 2014 Rights Victim Law Rights Center. Law Center. All rights
Grades Grade Key: I:
Academic Standards and Policies For the Predoctoral Program in Dentistry at NYU College of Dentistry Guidelines for Academic Progress, Promotion and Graduation The educational goal of New York University
RIGHTS OF YOUTH IN MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC SCHOOLS REGARDING SCHOOL DISCIPLINE. Prepared by the Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee * March 2015
RIGHTS OF YOUTH IN MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC SCHOOLS REGARDING SCHOOL DISCIPLINE Prepared by the Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee * March 2015 This pamphlet describes the rights of youth attending public
Admissions Procedures
Parent Policy: Admissions Effective Date: December 1, 2015 Last Reviewed Date: November 18, 2015 Policy Sponsor: Vice President Academic and Chief Operating Officer Administrative Responsibility: Registrar
University of Illinois at Chicago Student Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Violence Interim Policy
University of Illinois at Chicago Student Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Violence Interim Policy Introduction The University of Illinois at Chicago is committed to creating a safe and secure community for
Best Practices for Addressing the Confluence of Campus Complaints with Criminal Trials
Best Practices for Addressing the Confluence of Campus Complaints with Criminal Trials By: Brett A. Sokolow, JD The conventional wisdom of the student conduct field is that colleges should not delay campus
HARTFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT SAFE SCHOOL CLIMATE PLAN
HARTFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT SAFE SCHOOL CLIMATE PLAN The Hartford Public Schools Board of Education is committed to creating and maintaining a physically, emotionally, and intellectually safe educational
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Sexual Harassment Policy (Employee-To-Employee) BUL-1893.1 Kevin S. Reed, General Counsel ROUTING Principals Administrators All Employees DATE: August 1, 2005 POLICY: The Los Angeles
OREGON STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY DIVISION 031 CODE OF STUDENT CONDUCT AND RESPONSIBILITY
OREGON STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY DIVISION 031 CODE OF STUDENT CONDUCT AND RESPONSIBILITY 577-031-0125 General Policy (1) Portland State University seeks excellence in
CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM 20-1. PREAMBLE RULE 20-1.1 PURPOSE
CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM 20-1. PREAMBLE RULE 20-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to use the title paralegal, to establish
Code of Academic Integrity
Policy V. 2.7.7 Responsible Official: Vice Provost for Student Affairs Effective Date: August 18, 2015 Code of Academic Integrity Policy Statement The University should provide an environment that encourages
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS PROGRAM
United States Department of Agriculture Marketing and Regulatory Programs Agricultural Marketing Service Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration
Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se
Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se Only members of the bar of this Court may appear as counsel in civil cases. Only individuals who are parties in civil cases may represent themselves.
STUDENT PROTECTION FROM DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT
STUDENT PROTECTION FROM DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT The Law School has been embracing diversity and equal opportunity since its founding in 1899. Our founders believed that a legal education should be
graduate academic policies and procedures
graduate academic policies and procedures These pages contain information on policies, procedures, and regulations that are specific to graduate study at Columbia College Chicago. Students should check
Procedure 1B.1.1 Report/Complaint of Discrimination/Harassment Investigation and Resolution
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System Procedures Chapter 1B System Organization and Administration / Equal Education and Employment Opportunity Report/Complaint of Discrimination/Harassment
